Additional Documentation - Planning Applications

New Manor Farm, Middle 

Winterslow, Wiltshire 

An archaeological desk based assessment 

for a proposed wind turbine development. 

MARK CORNEY BA (Hons) FSA and NIK MORRIS 

April 2011

NEW MANOR FARM, MIDDLE WINTERSLOW, WILTSHIRE: A DESK BASED 

ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT. 

Mark Corney and Nik Morris 

SUMMARY 

A desk based archaeological assessment of a proposed wind turbine site at New 

Manor Farm, Middle Winterslow, Wiltshire, NGR centre SU23193391. 28 records of 

Designated and Non-Designated Heritage Assets, including prehistoric funerary 

monuments, were identified within a 1 kilometre radius of the proposed site. It is 

concluded that there is a high probability of plough-levelled archaeology within the 

study area. 

1. INTRODUCTION 

1.1 This report sets out the results of a largely desk-based archaeology and cultural 

heritage assessment of a proposed wind turbine site at New Manor Farm, Middle 

Winterslow, Wiltshire centred on ST23193391 (Fig. 1). The study has been prepared 

for Aspire Planning Ltd. 

1.2 The study has been prepared in support of a proposed planning application to 

Salisbury District Council for the construction of a wind turbine and an associated 

cable trench. The study was undertaken by Mark Corney and Nik Morris during 

March and April 2011. The aim of the report is to provide an assessment of the 

known heritage assets that may contribute to the understanding of the historic 

environment of the proposed development site. 

1.3 The village of Middle Winterslow is located 3km to the north east of Salisbury. 

The study area covers a 1 kilometre radius centred on the proposed wind turbine 

development at NGR SU231339. The wind turbine and associated cable run are 

sited within a field of approximately 52ha. The field is under an arable regime and is 

bounded along the western and northern limits by a belt of mature trees; to the east 

by a hedge adjacent to a minor road leading from the A30 road to Middle Winterslow 

and to the south by a hedge. The field is overlooked from the south by a steep chalk 

escarpment (Figure 1). The field slopes gently from south east to north west and is

etween 90mOD and 115mOD. The underlying geology is chalk. The study area is 

rich in archaeological remains ranging from extensive prehistoric cemeteries and field 

systems, Romano-British activity, Anglo-Saxon burials and medieval settlement. 

Figure 1. Location of the proposed wind turbine and cable trench

2. METHODOLOGY 

2.1 The study consisted of a desk-based assessment, as defined by the Institute for 

Archaeologists Standards and Guidance, of the heritage assets that contribute to the 

historic environment of the application site and of a surrounding zone (radius 1km) 

intended to provide an immediate context. 

2.2 The scope of the study included designated heritage assets (world heritage sites, 

scheduled monuments, listed buildings, conservation areas, battlefield sites, 

registered parks and garden) and non-designated assets (archaeological sites and 

finds, historic buildings, other historic landscape features or other locally-designated 

features, or areas, of cultural heritage importance. 

2.3 The following data sources have been examined: 

• Historic maps and documents held at The Wiltshire Heritage Centre; 

• Archaeological, historic building or other heritage designation information held by 

the Wiltshire Historic Environment Record; 

• Archaeological, historic building and other heritage designation information, 

including air photographs, held by English Heritage in its National Monuments 

Record (NMR) at Swindon; 

• The on-line catalogue of air photographs held by The Unit For Landscape 

Modeling, University of Cambridge (examination of this resource was not possible 

due to closure of the Unit to the public); 

• Other published or unpublished information, and; 

• A site inspection carried out by Mark Corney and Nik Morris on 23 rd March 2011 

3. LEGISLATION AND GUIDANCE 

3.1 An assessment of the impact of wind energy installations on the historic 

environment is summarised in English Heritage 2005, ‘Wind Energy and the Historic 

Environment’. Relevant protection, guidance and policies relating to the protection, 

maintenance and enhancement of archaeological sites and other aspects of cultural 

heritage may be summarised as follows:

Planning Guidance for Archaeology and the Historic Environment 

3.2 General policy and guidance for the conservation of the historic environment 

under development control procedures are now contained in Planning Policy 

Statement 5: Planning for the Historic Environment (formerly Planning Policy 

Guidance notes 15 and 16), released in March 2010. Archaeological sites, buildings, 

parks and gardens, battlefields or other aspects of the historic environment that have 

significance because of their historic, archaeological, architectural or artistic interest 

are now considered heritage assets under a unified policy system. The relevant 

policies are listed below: 

Policy HE1: Heritage assets and climate change 

Policy HE2: Evidence base for plan-making 

Policy HE3: Regional and local planning approaches 

Policy HE4: Permitted development and Article 4 directions 

Policy HE5: Monitoring indicators 

Policy HE6: Information requirements for applications for consent affecting 

heritage assets 

Policy HE7: Policy principles guiding the determination of applications for consent 

relating to all heritage assets 

Policy HE8: Additional policy principle guiding the consideration of applications for 

consent relating to heritage assets that are not covered by Policy HE9 

Policy HE9: Additional policy principles guiding the consideration of applications 

for consent relating to designated heritage assets 

Policy HE10: Additional policy principles guiding the consideration of applications 

for development affecting the setting of a designated heritage asset 

Policy HE11: Enabling development 

Policy HE12: Policy principles guiding the recording of information relating to 

heritage assets 

Listed Buildings/Structures 

3.3 Buildings of national, regional, or local historical and architectural importance are 

protected by the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act, 1990. 

Buildings designated as ‘Listed’ are afforded protection from physical alteration or 

effects on their historical setting.

Local Authority Plan Policies 

3.4 Relevant saved policies for the management of archaeology and cultural heritage 

are set out in the Salisbury District Local Plan 2011. 

Policies CN20-CN23 seek to preserve features of archaeological interest and, in 

appropriate circumstances, are intended to exploit opportunities which may be 

presented for archaeological investigation or the safeguarding of important evidence 

which might otherwise be destroyed without record as a result of development. The 

Local Planning Authority is guided in its approach to archaeology by the provisions of 

Planning Policy Guidance Note 16: "Archaeology and Planning", and will seek the 

advice of the County Archaeologist. Prospective developers are encouraged to refer 

to this document and consult the County Archaeologist prior to the submission of any 

planning application. The County Archaeology Service is now able to provide 

information to prospective applicants on where there are areas of archaeological 

interest in the District. It should be noted that the allocations for employment, 

housing, infill or other developments do not obviate the need to follow procedures 

laid down in PPG16. Where the fabric or setting of known archaeological 

monuments, whether scheduled or not, would be adversely affected by permitted 

development, the Local Planning Authority may use its powers to control such works 

by an Article 4 Direction. 

When considering proposals which may affect archaeological sites, the Council will 

ensure that a procedure is followed which both protects the site and its setting and 

arrives at a reasonable and informed decision. The Local Plan area contains a wealth 

of archaeological features, many of which have not been investigated, or are as yet 

undiscovered. Where such remains are thought to exist either as a result of 

consultation with the County Archaeologist, or through research initiated by a 

prospective developer, there will be a requirement for site evaluation prior to the 

determining of any application. In many instances a site may accrue archaeological 

potential by its proximity to known archaeological monuments, its setting with the 

landscape, or by the recorded presence of archaeological artefacts from within the 

site. In such instances, where the site has a clear archaeological potential, but little 

recorded information, an evaluation, including where necessary excavation work, 

would need to be undertaken to establish the presence and extent of archaeological 

deposits and explore the site’s potential. This is usually a rapid and inexpensive 

operation involving ground survey and small-scale trial trenching, but it should be

carried out by a professionally qualified archaeological organisation or archaeologist. 

Evaluations are designed to help define the character and extent of any 

archaeological remains that exist in the area, and thus indicate the weight which 

ought to be attached to their preservation. In appropriate circumstances the 

evaluation can comprise a desk top study. Where the results of such a study show 

that there is no potential for finding any archaeological remains, no fieldwork will be 

necessary. There will be a presumption in favour of the physical preservation in situ 

of nationally important archaeological remains, whether scheduled or not. However, 

where the preservation of remains in situ is not justified, developers should be willing 

to enter into a voluntary agreement to undertake the satisfactory excavation and 

recording of remains including the publication of the results. In the event of 

developers not wishing to enter into such an agreement, planning permission, if 

granted, will be subject to a condition that the development should not proceed in the 

area of archaeological interest until required archaeological works have been 

implemented, as PPG16 recommends. Conditions may also be placed on 

developments to allow observation and recording during the early stages of 

development. 

Policy CN20 

Many historic and archaeological features do not have any form of statutory 

protection and are under threat from the various pressures of development, 

agriculture, forestry and tourism. For this reason, a number of Areas of Special 

Archaeological Significance have been defined in the Proposals Map. These areas of 

high archaeological interest are largely rural and some cover extensive tracts of 

countryside, and contain, for example, whole barrow groups, settlements and sub- 

surface features. Due to the richness of the District’s historic environment, the 

designation covers the majority of the plan area. The purpose of the Areas of Special 

Archaeological Significance is to preserve for posterity these areas of high 

archaeological interest and their definition is the means whereby a selective 

approach to preservation will be achieved, using existing legislation and the voluntary 

co-operation of landowners and farmers. The value of these areas lies in the 

preservation of a segment of ancient landscape of settlement form and the resultant 

cluster of associated features. Development proposals, including forestry schemes, 

which would adversely affect these ancient landscapes will generally not be allowed.

Policies CN21 & CN22 

The emphasis is placed on negotiations being held at an early stage so that 

integrated programmes of work can be agreed. This is particularly important in the 

historic settlements identified in CN23 as these areas have a wealth of known 

archaeological interest and a high potential for the discovery of further archaeological 

remains. Therefore, where development proposals come forward in these 

settlements, the Local Planning Authority will expect the archaeological implications 

of the development to be established prior to the determination of the application, 

and the opportunity for appropriate archaeological site investigations to be provided. 

Policy CN23 

Developers should make provision for investigating and protecting new sites as yet 

undiscovered. The County Archaeologist will continue to be informed of planning 

applications submitted within the District. The Local Planning Authority is aware of 

the potential for new sites to be discovered, and it is hoped that the policies of the 

Local Plan will minimise the late discovery of important archaeological remains once 

development is in progress. 

4. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE 

4.1 Recorded in Domesday as Winterslei, Winterslow originally comprised three 

manors of which Middle Winterlsow was the smallest. The Domesday entry suggests 

that Middle Winterslow included 450-550 acres of ploughland, with a population of 

approximately 15-25 people and was held by Ulward, one of the King's thanes. There 

was also woodland 3 furlongs long and 1 furlong wide. The value of the holdings was 

20 shillings and four peasants ("rustici") also held land. In 1377 there were twelve 

poll-tax payers. In 1727 the Manor of Middle Winterslow was given to St John’s 

College, Oxford. 

4.2 Mapping evidence 

The earliest map consulted is the Andrews and Drury Map of Wiltshire dated 1773. 

This depicts the general layout of the road system and the location of New Manor 

Farm but not the individual field boundaries (Figure 2). The Tithe Map of 1841 

(Figure 3) indicates that the field of the proposed wind turbine location had been 

established by that date, was divided into three parcels and tenanted by Robert 

Haydon. The Apportionment suggests that it was under cultivation and gives the

three parcel names: the eastern parcel “Below the Hill” the second is also “Below the 

Hill” and the most westerly parcel as “Great Field”. An estate map of 1873 (based on 

an earlier map of 1824 and presumed lost) records the land as still belonging to St 

John’s College, Oxford and shows the field boundaries and surrounding buildings, 

including New Manor Farm and Lower Barn much as they appear today (Figure 4). 

The 1 st edition OS 25” to the mile plan of 1876 (Figure 5) shows the layout still visible 

today. 

Figure 2. Extract from Andrews and Dury Map of Wiltshire 1773 

Figure 3. Extract from Tithe Map of Winterslow 1841

Figure 4. Extract from Winterslow Estate belonging to St Johns College Oxford 1873 

Figure 5. Extract from Ordnance Survey 1:25” to the mile plan 1876

The mapping evidence demonstrates the proposed wind turbine location is within an 

area which has been under cultivation for at least 200 years and the surrounding 

boundaries and landscape has changed little since the early nineteenth century. An 

archaeological watching brief at Lower Barn Farm (Figure 6, site 20), on the eastern 

edge of application field, proved negative with no archaeological features or deposits 

noted (Phillips 2005). 

5. AIR PHOTOGRAPHS 

5.1 A total of 103 oblique air photographs and 43 vertical air photographs were 

examined at the National Monuments Record in Swindon; a further 5 oblique and 3 

vertical images held by The Unit for Landscape Modelling at Cambridge University 

were noted but not examined due the closure of the Unit to the public (full listing of 

images consulted are presented in Appendix 2). 

5.2 Numerous features of archaeological significance were noted on the air 

photographic cover examined and are plotted on Figure 6. Within the field subject to 

this application there is a short length of ditch of unknown date (Figure 6, site 16) and 

a plough-levelled feature possibly representing a former holloway (Figure 6, site 17). 

An extensive ploughed-out field system of prehistoric date covers an area in excess 

of 700ha to the north west of the application site (Figure 6, sites 4, 5); this is cut by a 

series of holloways of probable Medieval or later date (Figure 6, site 6). Between the 

field system and the application site, to the west of Pickpocket Firs, are a series of 

ring-ditches that coincide with the recorded positions of a plough-levelled barrow 

cemetery of Bronze Age date (Figure 6, site 2). To the south east of the application 

area are cropmarks of a linear ditch system integrated with a small, ditched, sub- 

rectangular enclosure of probable prehistoric date (Figure 6, site 22). 

6. HERITAGE ASSETS Figure 6, Table 1 

Designated assets 

6.1 There are no designated heritage assets within the application site boundary and 

one designated heritage asset within the study area. This comprises a number of 

Bronze Age barrows forming of the Winterslow Hut barrow cemetery located 

approximately 500m north of the application site boundary (Figure 6, site 1, Table 1).

TABLE 1. Designated Heritage Assets 

Number 

(Fig. 6) 

NGR (SU) Description Reference 

1 22883497 Winterslow Hut Bronze Age barrow cemetery. NMR text SAM26790. 

reads: Barrows forming part of a cemetery situated to the NMR Monument No. 223513 

northwest of the Pheasant Hotel. Nine of the barrows are HER SU23SW604, 

included within this scheduling. Two survive as substantial SU23SW605, SU23SW606, 

earthworks - the most northerly example is a bowl barrow SU23SW607, SU23SW608, 

23 metres in diameter with a maximum height of 0.8 SU23SW609, SU23SW676, 

metres. Traces of the barrow ditch also survive. The most SU23SW677, SU23SW678, 

southerly earthwork has a diameter of 15 metres and 

maximum height of 1.2 metres. Traces of a barrow ditch 

SU23SW679. 

also survive. Three other barrows survive as slight 

earthworks ranging from 20 metres to 30 metres in 

diameter. The sites of three more barrows are visible on 

aerial photographs. Wilts HER assigns individual records 

for each barrow (see right) and records 10 barrows in the 

group. 

Palmer 1984 

Non-designated assets 

6.2 A search of the Wiltshire Historic Environment Record (HER) returned a total of 

32 entries for the study area, two of which are within the application site field 

boundary (Figure 6, Table 2, sites 17 and 18). The English Heritage Pastscape 

record returned 33 results within the study area. The combined HER and Pastscape 

records and a concordance are presented in Table 2 (individual barrow entries for the 

large Bronze Age cemeteries have been amalgamated for ease of presentation). The 

overall date range of sites and findspots includes an extensive prehistoric landscape 

including field systems, barrow cemeteries and settlement sites; a Roman road from 

Winchester (Venta Belgarum) to Old Sarum (Sorviodunum) and stray Romano-British 

finds; possible Anglo-Saxon burials, finds of medieval date and post-medieval 

buildings.

Number 

(Fig. 6) 

TABLE 2. Non-designated Heritage Assets 

NGR (SU) Description Reference: 

(NMR = English Heritage 

‘Pastscape’. HER = Wiltshire 

2 22913428 

(centre) 

3 22223404- 

22403497 

4 22703461 

(centre) 

Plough levelled Bronze Age barrow cemetery comprising at 

least seven barrows known from antiquarian observations 

and air photography. Probably a southern extension of the 

Winterslow Hut cemetery (Record 1). 

Plough levelled linear feature. A ditch with traces of a bank 

on the east side. Possibly a later prehistoric land division. 

Plough levelled co-axial field system. Probably links to 

record no. 5. 

5 22333386 Plough levelled co-axial field system. Probably links to 

record no. 4. 

6 22363338- 

22003445 

Multiple holloways or tracks. Still extant as earthworks prior 

to World War II; now plough levelled. Probably post- 

Medieval track system. 

Historic Environment Record.) 

NMR223518 (only lists four 

barrows) 

HER SU23SW610, 

SU23SW611, SU23SW612, 

SU23SW613, SU23SW636, 

SU23SW637, SU23SW638. 

Palmer 1984. 

HER SU23SW655 

NMR223516 

HER SU23SW628 

Palmer 1984. 

NMR223512 

HER SU23SW654 

Palmer 1984 

HER SU23SW641, 

SU23SW691, SU23SW692, 

SU23SW693, SU23SW694. 

The latter 4 records are 

observations of multiple tracks 

recorded in a gas pipeline. 

7 22353330 Findspot. Romano-British fibula and decorated tweezers. HER SU23SW324 

8 225332 Findspot. Medieval casket key. HER SU23SW458 

9 22643364 New Manor Farmhouse. Early 19 th century. Listed Building Grade II 1987. 

Delisted March 1991. 

10 23073318 Roman road from Winchester (Venta Belgarum) to Old 

NMR527930 

HER SU23SW319 

(centre) Sarum (Sorviodunum). 

11 227331 Part of a plough levelled co-axial field system. On a 

common alignment with records 4 and 5. 

HER SU23SW631 

12 23133480 18 th century barn adjacent to the former Pheasant Inn. NMR527937 

13 23153480 Former Pheasant Inn or Winterslow Hut; early 18 th century 

house with later alterations. 

NMR527936 

14 234348 Findspot. Anglo-Saxon skeleton associated with a bronze NMR223544 

brooch and sword scabbard found in 1870. 

HER SU23SW401 

15 23203465 Findspot. Romano-British brooch. HER SU23SW323 

16 22983404- Length of undated ditch noted on NMR AP SU2234/7/129. Not recorded on HER or NMR 

23083408 On similar alignment to co-axial field system records 4 and 

5. 

17 23153390 Plough levelled linear feature visible on air photographs; 

possibly a trackway. 

HER SU23SW668 

18 23333347 Undated ditch observed in gas pipeline. HER SU23SW695 

19 238346 Undated plough levelled field system. Possibly of recent HER SU23SW665 

(centre) date. 

20 23503426 Lower Barn Farm. Barn dated to later 18 th century. An NMR527935 

archaeological watching brief in 2005 proved negative 

(Phillips 2005). 

(Phillips 2005) 

21 23533422 Lower Barn Farmhouse. Farm built circa 1800. NMR527934 

22 238337 Field system noted by Wilts HER. Examination of NMR AP’s HER SU23SW633 

has recorded a sub-rectangular enclosure attached to a 

linear ditch system in addition to traces of field system. The 

enclosure may be of later prehistoric date. NMR AP 

SU2333/4/475. 

Palmer 1984. 

23 23483329 Bronze Age barrow; ‘Cobhill Barrow’. NMR223519 

HER SU23SW618 

24 Unlocated 

SU23SW 

Findspot. Anglo-Saxon spearhead. NMR223542 

25 Unlocated 

SU23SW 

Findspot. Bronze Age socketed axehead. NMR970005 

26 Unlocated 

SU23SW 

Findspot. Bronze Age daggers and a razor. NMR970006 

27 Unlocated 

SU23SW 

Findspot. Hoard of Medieval coins of reign of King Stephen. NMR970008 

28 Unlocated 

SU23SW 

Findspot. Hoard of silver pennies dated 1553-1625. NMR970008 (bis)

7. SITE CONDITIONS 

7.1 The site was inspected on 23 rd March 2011 and was under cultivation (Plate 1). 

The site is has been subject to prolonged cultivation and no surface features, 

earthworks or artefacts were noted. 

8. COMMENTS 

8.1 The application area contains no Scheduled Ancient Monuments, Listed 

Buildings or other statutorily protected heritage assets. Features of archaeological 

origin are present on air photographs within the application site; an undated length of 

ditch (site 16) is on a similar alignment to a prehistoric field system (sites 4 and 5) 

and a possible plough levelled trackway, probably of post-medieval date, is known 

(site 17). A short length of ditch, undated, was observed in a gas pipeline towards the 

southern end of the application area (site 18). The general paucity of features on the 

available air photographic cover may be the result of prolonged cultivation, 

suggested by the historic mapping, and the possibility of an accumulation of deeper 

colluvial deposits derived from the steep scarp to the south. 

8.2 There is a high potential for archaeological deposits within the study area. The 

presence of a ploughed-out Bronze Age barrow cemetery immediately to the north 

west of the application site and a ploughed-out field system, some 500m to the west, 

all point to the area being of considerable significance during the prehistoric period. It 

is concluded that further, possibly plough levelled, archaeology may reasonably be 

expected within the application area. 

Bibliography 

English Heritage, 2005 Wind Energy and the Historic Environment. 

Phillips B. 2005 Archaeological observation at Lower Barn, New Manor Farm 

2005 Report 2005.004 (unpublished) 

Palmer R. 1984 Danebury: an Iron Age Hillfort in Hampshire. An aerial 

photographic interpretation of its environs RCHME HMSO

Figure 6. All designated and non-designated heritage assets within the study area (see Table 1 and Table 2 for descriptions)

Appendix 1. Historic maps consulted. 

Andrews and Drury 1773 and 1810 

http://history.wiltshire.gov.uk/community/getcom.php?id=253 accessed 04/04/11 

Stockbridge Turnpike Road 1826 

451/73/27 

Tithe map of Winterslow (and apportionment) 1841 

TA/Winterslow 

Winterslow Estate belonging to St Johns College Oxford 1873 

1626/10 

Ordnance Survey 1 st edition 25”to the mile 1876

Appendix 2. Air photographs consulted. 

NMR Vertical photographs 

Sortie number Library 

number 

Frame 

number 

Centre point Date Film details (in inches) Film held 

by 

RAF/106G/UK/1656 443 3135 SU 238 336 11 JUL 1946 Black and White 8.25 x 7.5 MOD 



RAF/CPE/UK/1811 517 2276 SU 227 338 29 OCT 1946 Black and White 8.25 x 7.5 NMR 






RAF/CPE/UK/1927 544 2100 SU 236 338 16 JAN 1947 Black and White 8.25 x 7.5 MOD 




RAF/CPE/UK/1973 586 3403 SU 221 344 11 APR 1947 Black and White 8.25 x 7.5 NMR 




RAF/CPE/UK/2102 670 4060 SU 234 336 28 MAY 1947 Black and White 8.25 x 7.5 NMR 

RAF/CPE/UK/2102 670 4061 SU 229 340 28 MAY 1947 Black and White 8.25 x 7.5 NMR 

MAL/72073 6105 14 SU 230 352 10 AUG 1972 Black and White 9 x 9 NMR 









OS/69015 11122 182 SU 239 348 07 MAR 1969 Black and White 9 x 9 NMR 



OS/70069 11152 15 SU 238 335 03 MAY 1970 Black and White 9 x 9 NMR 






OS/95627 14942 74 SU 238 331 20 JUL 1995 Black and White 9 x 9 NMR 






Total sorties 9 

Total images 43

NMR Oblique photographs 

Photo Film and 

reference frame 

(NGR and number 

Index 

number) 

Date Film type Map Reference (6 

figure grid ref) 

SU2234/ 14 NMR18205 / 14 19 DEC 1998 Colour slide 35 mm SU 224346 

SU2234/ 15 NMR18205 / 15 19 DEC 1998 Colour slide 35 mm SU 224346 

SU2234/ 16 NMR26534 / 34 30 JAN 2010 Digital colour 35 mm SU 226347 








SU 2235 / 2 CCC11752 / 1191 Unknown Black& white Unknown SU 226351 

SU 2235 / 4 NMR 8224 / 08 19 DEC 1998 Black& white 70mm,120,220 SU 229353 

SU 2235 / 7 NMR 8738 / 11 16 JAN 2000 Black& white 70mm,120,220 SU 229353 

SU 2235 / 8 NMR 8548 / 16 16 JAN 2000 Colour neg 35 mm SU 228353 

SU 2235 / 

17 

NMR26534 / 45 30 JAN 2010 Digital colour 35 mm SU 226350 

SU2235/ 18 NMR 6534 / 46 30 JAN 2010 Digital colour 35 mm SU 225350 












SU2332 / 2 CCC11752 / 4856 Unknown Black& white Unknown SU 231329 

SU2332 / 4 CCC11752 /4841- Unknown 

4842 

Black& white Unknown SU 232325 

SU 2333 / 1 CCC11752 /4884- Unknown 

4890 


SU 2333 / 2 CCC11752 /4873- Unknown 

4875 


SU 2333 / 3 CCC11752 /4838- Unknown 

4840 


SU 2333 / 4 NMR 485 / 470- 

476 

13 MAY 1973 Black& white 70mm,120,220 SU 237337 




SU 2334 / 4 CCC 

/ 4867 Unknown Black& white Unknown SU 237342 


SU 2334/ 6 CCC11752 /4820 Unknown Black& white Unknown SU 230348

SU 2334 / 7 CCC 1752 / 4827 Unknown Black& white Unknown SU 234348 


SU2334 / 9 CCC11752 / 4826 Unknown Black& white Unknown SU 232348 

SU2334/ 10 CCC 1828 / 6381 1930 Black& white Unknown SU 232349 

SU2334/ 11 CCC 1757 / 7786 Unknown Black& white Unknown SU 233347 

SU2334/ 12 NMR 8738 / 15 16 JAN 2000 Black& white 70mm,120,220 SU 232349 

SU2334/ 13 NMR18738 / 16 16 JAN 2000 Black& white 70mm,120,220 SU 232349 

SU2334/ 14 NMR 8548 / 18 16 JAN 2000 Colour neg 35 mm SU 231349 

SU2334/ 15 NMR18548 / 19 16 JAN 2000 Colour neg 35 mm SU 232349 






SU2335/ 16 NMR 8224 / 10 19 DEC 1998 Black& white 70mm,120,220 SU 231350 

SU2335/ 17 NMR 8224 / 11 19 DEC 1998 Black& white 70mm,120,220 SU 231350 

SU2335/ 21 NMR 8205 / 12 19 DEC 1998 Colour slide 35 mm SU 231350 









SU 2432 / 2 CCC11752 / 4898 Unknown 

4897 


SU 2432 / 4 CCC11752 / 

4850- 

4853 

Unknown Black& white Unknown SU 240328 

SU 2433 / 1 CCC11752 / 4876 Unknown 

4877 


SU 2433 / 2 CCC 1752 / 

4846- 

4849 


SU 2433 / 3 NMR 968 / 243- 

245 

18 JUL 1976 Black& white 70mm,120,220 SU 245339 


SU 2434 / 3 CCC11752 / 

4868- 

4872 



SU 2434 / 7 CCC11752 

/ 

4833- 

4837 


Total 103 

records

Air photographs held by CUCAP (currently unavailable for consultation) 

Vertical 

PHOTO ID CAMERA FILM TYPE DATE SUBJECT Scale NGRE NGRN ID 

RC8AS032 RC8 Black & White 



Oblique 

Tue, 5 Nov 

1974 

Tue, 5 Nov 

1974 

Tue, 5 Nov 

1974 

Porton Down, Boscombe Down E & 

Idmiston Down 


Idmiston Down 


Idmiston Down 

9000 21095 32975 28573 

9000 21738 33486 28574 

9000 23253 32494 28601 

PHOTO ID SUBJECT KM SQUARE NGRE NGRN DATE ID 

AWM10 Celtic fields, 1.25 miles NNW of Winterslow SU=41 22300 34000 Wed, 15 Jan 1969 89506 

AWM11 Celtic fields, 1.25 miles NNW of Winterslow SU=41 22300 34000 Wed, 15 Jan 1969 89507 

BWJ95 Celtic fields, Winterbourne Down, 2.25 miles ESE of Winterbourne SU=41 21000 33700 Fri, 23 Jan 1976 146888 

CFD74 Ancient Trackways, 2.25 miles NW of Winterslow SU=41 22100 33700 Wed, 25 Jan 1978 167787 

CFD75 Ancient Trackways, 2.25 miles NW of Winterslow SU=41 22100 33700 Wed, 25 Jan 1978 167788

Additional Documentation - Planning Applications

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?