Damus-Kaye-Stanzel vs Bulboventricular Foramen resection

More documents

Recommendations

Info

• N=20: Although the absolute bulboventricular foramen size did increase in approximately 50% of patients, this was not predictable, and when indexed to body surface area, there was an overall decrease with time (20%)
Management strategies: DKS <strong>vs</strong> BVF <strong>resection</strong> (or other non “arch” procedures)
Page 1 and 2: Damus-Kaye-Stanzel vs Bulboventricu
Page 4 and 5: Lets agree on a few principles 1. S
Page 6 and 7: Lets agree on a few principles 1. S
Page 8: Does PA banding really increase the
Page 15 and 16: • a systemic outflow gradient at
Page 18 and 19: You are more likely to end up with
Page 20 and 21: Patients WITHOUT aortic arch obstru
Page 22 and 23: What happens to the BVF even if you
Page 30 and 31: BVF resection
Page 36 and 37: BVF resection: location of the cond
Page 41 and 42: Mosca et al, ATS 1997
Page 43 and 44: Mosca et al, ATS 1997
Page 45 and 46: Conclusions • BVF size in the neo
Page 47 and 48: Conclusion (management) • If ther

Damus-Kaye-Stanzel vs Bulboventricular Foramen resection

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?