Damus-Kaye-Stanzel vs Bulboventricular Foramen resection

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Lets agree on a few principles 1. Surgical strategy largely determined by: – BVF – Semilunar valves – (aortic arch) 2. BVF resection is not applicable during neonatal period (exposure, friable tissue) Therefore, if subAS (restrictive BVF) is severe enough to warrant resection, then DKS/Norwood is necessary (palliative switch?)
Lets agree on a few principles 1. Surgical strategy largely determined by: – BVF – Semilunar valves – (aortic arch) 2. BVF resection is not applicable during neonatal period (exposure, friable tissue) Therefore, if subAS (restrictive BVF) is severe enough to warrant resection, then DKS/Norwood is necessary (palliative switch?) 3. If there is aortic arch obstruction, Norwood
Page 1 and 2: Damus-Kaye-Stanzel vs Bulboventricu
Page 4 and 5: Lets agree on a few principles 1. S
Page 8: Does PA banding really increase the
Page 15 and 16: • a systemic outflow gradient at
Page 18 and 19: You are more likely to end up with
Page 20 and 21: Patients WITHOUT aortic arch obstru
Page 22 and 23: What happens to the BVF even if you
Page 24 and 25: • N=20: Although the absolute bul
Page 30 and 31: BVF resection
Page 36 and 37: BVF resection: location of the cond
Page 41 and 42: Mosca et al, ATS 1997
Page 43 and 44: Mosca et al, ATS 1997
Page 45 and 46: Conclusions • BVF size in the neo
Page 47 and 48: Conclusion (management) • If ther

Damus-Kaye-Stanzel vs Bulboventricular Foramen resection

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?