02.06.2013 Views

Baldwin County Wetland Conservation Plan - Alabama Department ...

Baldwin County Wetland Conservation Plan - Alabama Department ...

Baldwin County Wetland Conservation Plan - Alabama Department ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Baldwin</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Wetland</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Final Summary Document<br />

Question 5. Is the observed wetland free of ditches as indicated by the absence of the NWI “d”<br />

special modifier?<br />

Rationale: The presence of ditches significantly alters the hydrologic regime of a wetland<br />

and reduces its ability to hold and slowly release water to the water table or aquifer.<br />

Consequently, the functional capacity to store water is diminished. This variable was<br />

identified remotely through digital NWI data.<br />

Data Column: ditch; subtract 1 point<br />

Question 6: Is observed wetland inside the zone of influence (designated wellhead protection<br />

area for the 10 year time of travel capture zone) of a major groundwater pumping<br />

center (withdrawal rates of three to four million gallons a day)?<br />

Rationale: Depressional wetlands within the Project area depend partly on groundwater<br />

discharge for their hydrologic requirements. Proximity of a wetland to a groundwater<br />

withdrawal well, which lowers the groundwater level within the zone of influence, could<br />

affect the hydrology of a wetland by lowering the water table. A wetland within the zone<br />

of influence of a groundwater withdrawal well would be more likely to exhibit a reduction<br />

in the groundwater table and would thus store more water than a wetland outside the<br />

zone of influence of a large groundwater withdrawal well. Since this variable deals with a<br />

human-induced condition, a “no” response will not count against a particular wetland.<br />

Rather, it will serve as a bonus question allowing a wetland extra consideration if this<br />

variable applies. This variable was identified remotely through digital maps provided by<br />

the EPA.<br />

Data Column: wellhead; 1 point bonus<br />

Sediment/Toxicant/Nutrient Removal<br />

Question 1: Does the adjacent land use surrounding the observed wetland fall into one<br />

of the following land use categories: residential, commercial, industrial,<br />

transportation, mixed urban use or agriculture?<br />

Rationale: The assumption is that developed or agricultural lands which surround a<br />

wetland would increase the nutrient, sediment, and toxicant load (fertilizer, animal waste,<br />

polluted runoff) entering the system. Thus, a wetland in this position would have an<br />

increased opportunity to cycle nutrients and filter water exiting the system. Since this<br />

variable deals with the issue of opportunity rather than functional performance, a “no”<br />

response will not count against a particular wetland. Rather, this will serve as a “bonus”<br />

question allowing a wetland extra consideration if this variable applies. This variable was<br />

identified remotely through digital land use data from FEMA.<br />

Data Column: STN_LULC; 1 point bonus<br />

Wildlife Habitat<br />

Question 1: Is the observed wetland free from government maintained roads?<br />

108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!