Baldwin County Wetland Conservation Plan - Alabama Department ...
Baldwin County Wetland Conservation Plan - Alabama Department ...
Baldwin County Wetland Conservation Plan - Alabama Department ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Baldwin</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Wetland</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Final Summary Document<br />
determinations. Accordingly, BCWCP and USACE staff chose the p-value of the BCWCP wetland<br />
validation study to be 0.90 with an error of ±5%. Using the table provided by the USACE, it was<br />
determined that 138 sampling locations would be necessary in order to establish a strong statistical<br />
foundation in comparing the NWI maps to on-the-ground jurisdictional wetlands.<br />
BCWCP staff found several random sampling scripts on the ESRI web page and reviewed<br />
them with the USACE statistician. After review, it was determined that the Simple Random Sampler,<br />
written in Avenue, be used since it offered supporting documentation. A total of 160 sampling<br />
locations were chosen to account for those locations where site access would be limited or<br />
permission to access the property would not be granted. The sampling script was run with the<br />
<strong>Baldwin</strong> <strong>County</strong> boundary as the base coverage to generate a point theme with 160 records. The<br />
point coverage was converted to a polygon coverage using each point as the centroid of a square<br />
acre. A site identification field was added to the data table using a numbering script.<br />
The polygon coverage was then overlaid on <strong>Baldwin</strong> <strong>County</strong>’s parcel data. A spatial join was<br />
executed, linking the parcel identification number to the sample table. The data were linked to the<br />
Revenue Commission’s database, in which the property owner’s name and address were linked to<br />
the sampling location. The database was then modified to house all of the data that would be<br />
collected in the validation study. BCWCP staff collected additional field data while making the<br />
jurisdictional determination at each sampling location. These data included the date visited and a<br />
determination of HGM class, functional capacity and soil survey type.<br />
Letters were sent to all property owners requesting permission to access the respective<br />
property. A form was created in the relational database for fieldwork purposes to increase the<br />
efficiency of data collection.<br />
3.2.2.1 Fieldwork<br />
Prior to validation study site visits in the field, BCWCP staff prepared maps of the site in<br />
order to aid in the access of the sites. The recently acquired color infrared (CIR) aerial photography<br />
was used extensively in this process. Site visits were coordinated with USACE staff and property<br />
owners. Each property owner was contacted via telephone prior to a site visit. This also gave staff<br />
the time to educate and inform each of the property owners on the significance of wetland<br />
functions.<br />
Field work at each sampling site consisted of the following steps:<br />
1. GPS: Way points of the sampling location were entered into the Trimble GeoExplorer 3.<br />
This instrument was used to navigate to the sampling locations. In areas of dense canopy<br />
cover, aerial photography and pacing methods were used to reach the square acre sampling<br />
location. GPS data points, site ID number and wetland/upland status were collected at the<br />
southeast corner of each square acre. Upon return from the field, these data were<br />
differentially corrected and exported in a shapefile format.<br />
2. <strong>Wetland</strong> determination: USACE staff conducted routine wetland determinations at each site per<br />
the guidance provided in the 1987 USACE <strong>Wetland</strong> Delineation Manual. Dominant<br />
vegetation, hydrological indicators and soil color (type) were noted on the field data sheet.<br />
Other notable features such as disturbances or atypical conditions were also noted.<br />
16