02.06.2013 Views

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

een working to define which miRNAs are testis-specific or -enriched, and to define<br />

their changes in the blood during testicular toxicant-induced injury. This presentation<br />

will briefly review the underlying biology and present an update <strong>of</strong> the<br />

work in this fast-moving area.<br />

29 Sperm mRNA Transcripts and DNA Methylation Marks As<br />

Indicators <strong>of</strong> Testicular Injury.<br />

K. Boekelheide. Brown University, Providence, RI.<br />

As a pure population <strong>of</strong> cells that have matured and differentiated within the seminiferous<br />

epithelium, sperm carry all <strong>of</strong> the information needed to fertilize an oocyte<br />

and initiate embryogenesis. Sperm deliver small and large RNAs and DNA to the<br />

oocyte. Using high throughput array technology, a panel <strong>of</strong> altered sperm mRNAs<br />

has been identified after exposure <strong>of</strong> rats to testicular toxicants. In men, the extent<br />

<strong>of</strong> sperm DNA methylation is related to sperm motility. <strong>The</strong> ultimate goal is to<br />

identify translatable sperm molecular signatures that will allow the rapid assessment<br />

<strong>of</strong> sperm effects in preclinical test species and exposed men.<br />

30 Biology <strong>of</strong> Low-Dose Response for DNA-Reactive Chemicals.<br />

J. Klapacz 1 and B. P. Engelward 2 . 1 TERC, <strong>The</strong> Dow Chemical Company, Midland,<br />

MI; 2 Department <strong>of</strong> Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology,<br />

Cambridge, MA.<br />

In the risk assessment process, DNA-reactive agents are generally considered to<br />

have no thresholds for their biological effects and this assumption formed the basis<br />

for linear low-dose extrapolation <strong>of</strong> any carcinogenic effects induced by these<br />

agents. On the other hand, cells have evolved to handle DNA lesions from endogenous<br />

and many exogenous DNA-reactive agents. In fact, DNA-repair processes are<br />

strictly conserved from bacteria to humans underlying their importance in protection<br />

against the effects <strong>of</strong> these agents, such as disease and aging. In recent years,<br />

low-dose response for DNA-reactive agents has been an active domain for research<br />

in toxicology, with publication <strong>of</strong> several datasets with large numbers <strong>of</strong> doses focused<br />

on the determination <strong>of</strong> no-observed-genotoxic-effect-level (NOGEL) values.<br />

This effort has included dose-response modelling to identify the best fit between<br />

linear and nonlinear models, such as bilinear (hockey-stick) and the<br />

benchmark dose (BMD) suite <strong>of</strong> models, and most datasets have supported a bilinear<br />

or nonlinear/threshold dose response as providing best fit based on statistical<br />

criteria. However, empirical demonstration <strong>of</strong> statistically-supported<br />

nonlinear/threshold dose response alone is not sufficient to achieve a paradigm shift<br />

in risk assessment. A clear understanding <strong>of</strong> the biological processes behind the<br />

shape <strong>of</strong> the low-dose response curve is similarly a critical piece <strong>of</strong> this journey, and<br />

one where less effort has been focused to date within toxicology. This workshop will<br />

explore some <strong>of</strong> the questions that need to be addressed to understand and bridge<br />

DNA-repair processes and cellular responses with the mode-<strong>of</strong>-action driving these<br />

nonlinear/threshold dose responses for genotoxic effects. <strong>The</strong> workshop will examine<br />

existing knowledge from the field <strong>of</strong> DNA repair and link it with response to<br />

low doses <strong>of</strong> DNA-reactive agents, in order to draw specific recommendations on a<br />

path forward.<br />

31 Genotoxic Effects and Dose Response: What Do We Know<br />

So Far?<br />

L. H. Pottenger. TERC, <strong>The</strong> Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI.<br />

Low-dose genotoxic response for DNA-reactive alkylating agents has been actively<br />

investigated recently, with large datasets focused on low-dose response and determination<br />

<strong>of</strong> no-observed-genotoxic-effect-level (NOGEL) values. Most <strong>of</strong> these recent<br />

datasets include dose-response modelling analyses and have demonstrated a bilinear<br />

or non-linear/threshold dose-response as the statistically supported best fit,<br />

including datasets for directly DNA-reactive chemicals such as MMS, MNU, EMS,<br />

and ENU. Recent data have demonstrated the ubiquitous presence <strong>of</strong> endogenously-derived<br />

DNA adducts, some <strong>of</strong> which are identical to ones induced by exogenous<br />

exposure to DNA-reactive chemicals. Use <strong>of</strong> stable isotopes has permitted<br />

differentiation between the identical endogenously- and exogenously-induced<br />

DNA adducts, demonstrating that the exogenously-induced DNA adducts can<br />

have non-linear dose-responses at low doses; examples include formaldehyde and<br />

EO, both <strong>of</strong> which show that endogenous adduct levels can swamp the exogenously-induced<br />

ones at low exposures. Thus the available empirical evidence supporting<br />

the existence <strong>of</strong> non-linear/threshold dose-response for mutagenic effects<br />

from DNA-reactive agents is already compelling, while a growing body <strong>of</strong> evidence<br />

6 SOT 2013 ANNUAL MEETING<br />

is demonstrating similar non-linear/threshold dose-responses for exogenously-induced<br />

DNA adducts. However, statistically supported demonstration <strong>of</strong> non-linear/threshold<br />

dose-response alone is inadequate to achieve a paradigm shift in risk<br />

assessment. A clear understanding <strong>of</strong> the biology behind the shape <strong>of</strong> the dose-response<br />

is a critical piece for this journey, especially at low doses, although considerably<br />

less effort has transpired on this aspect to date. Addressing the biology and biologically<br />

plausible modes-<strong>of</strong>-action driving these non-linear/threshold<br />

dose-responses for genotoxic effects is the next task, one in which DNA repair<br />

mechanisms are likely to play a key role, both for adducts and for impact on doseresponse<br />

for any resulting mutagenic effects.<br />

32 CometChip and Recombomice Shed Light on Gene-<br />

Exposure Interactions That Impact Genomic Stability.<br />

B. P. Engelward. Department <strong>of</strong> Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Technology, Cambridge, MA.<br />

We are interested in homologous recombination (HR) and base excision repair<br />

(BER) and the interaction between these DNA repair pathways. To explore HR in<br />

mammals, we created mice with recombination reporter systems (Recombomice) in<br />

which cells that have undergone an HR event fluoresce by combining tandem repeat<br />

<strong>of</strong> truncated copies <strong>of</strong> EYFP or EGFP gene. Here, we explore genetic and environmental<br />

factors that modulate susceptibility to HR in vivo. In particular, the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> inflammation, producing endogenous oxidative and alkylating DNA<br />

damage, as both a modulator and an inducer <strong>of</strong> HR is presented. Exposure to low<br />

dose and high dose radiation causes many <strong>of</strong> the same changes to DNA as exposure<br />

to inflammation and can lead to severe inflammatory responses. Consequently, our<br />

inflammation studies have broad relevance. In addition, we have developed Comet<br />

assay called ‘CometChip’ for DNA damage analysis in single cells in an automated<br />

fashion. <strong>The</strong> approach increases throughput and improves reproducibility. Here, we<br />

show pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> principle <strong>of</strong> the technology as well as several applications <strong>of</strong> the<br />

CometChip for studies <strong>of</strong> gene-environment interactions. Together, this work and<br />

the technologies generated new biological insights.<br />

HR has emerged as an important driver <strong>of</strong> carcinogenic sequence rearrangements.<br />

HR repairs double strand breaks in the S/G2 phases <strong>of</strong> the cell cycle resulting from<br />

endogenous and exogenous processes. While usually error free, errors in homologous<br />

recombination may result in sequence rearrangements and loss <strong>of</strong> heterozygosity,<br />

both <strong>of</strong> which are prominent features <strong>of</strong> cancer cells. BER is also a key DNA repair<br />

pathway. In this case, damaged bases are removed, the DNA backbone is<br />

cleaved, the ends are processed and the resulting gap is filled from the opposite<br />

strand. Both pathways are usually error-free, but there are still rare events where<br />

there are misalignments during HR, and misinsertions during BER. Also, both<br />

pathways are active in response to spontaneous DNA damage, and thus would be<br />

expected to be active in response to low dose radiation.<br />

33 Role <strong>of</strong> Mismatch Repair in Mutagenesis, Cancer, and DNA-<br />

Damage Signaling.<br />

W. Edelmann. Department <strong>of</strong> Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College <strong>of</strong> Medicine,<br />

Bronx, NY. Sponsor: J. Klapacz.<br />

<strong>The</strong> DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system is essential for maintaining the integrity<br />

<strong>of</strong> mammalian genomes by removing misincorporated nucleotides that result from<br />

erroneous replication. In addition, MMR participates in the early steps <strong>of</strong> checkpoint<br />

activation and apoptosis during the cellular response to alkylation induced<br />

O 6 MeG:T mismatches and many other DNA lesions, particularly relevant at lowdose,<br />

clinically-relevant exposures. Mutations in mammalian MMR genes result in<br />

increased spontaneous mutation rates and strong predisposition to colorectal cancers<br />

and other cancers. Eukaryotic MMR is a complex system that requires the interaction<br />

<strong>of</strong> several MutS and MutL proteins for the initiation <strong>of</strong> the repair reaction.<br />

Subsequent to mismatch recognition, downstream events are activated that<br />

lead to the excision <strong>of</strong> misincorporated or damaged nucleotides and the signaling <strong>of</strong><br />

DNA damage-induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. <strong>The</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> the MMR-dependent<br />

DNA damage response is <strong>of</strong> significant clinical relevance as it results in increased<br />

resistance to many alkylating and chemotherapeutic agents. Our research<br />

program focuses on elucidating the functions <strong>of</strong> the individual MutS and MutL homologs<br />

in mammalian MMR and on assessing their importance for tumor suppression<br />

and the DNA damage response. Our results show that the DNA damage signaling<br />

by MMR is important for the suppression <strong>of</strong> tumorigenesis in the initial<br />

stages <strong>of</strong> the process. In addition, we found that MMR missense mutations can effectively<br />

separate the DNA repair and damage response functions and result in<br />

more heterogeneous cancer phenotypes than those caused by complete loss <strong>of</strong> function<br />

mutations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!