03.06.2013 Views

oxford

oxford

oxford

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5<br />

The Conquest of Greece<br />

THERE is no real evidence for why the Persians invaded Greece in<br />

480. The pretty debate furnished by Herodotus at the start of book 7 of<br />

his History is almost certainly the product of his imagination; it is highly<br />

unlikely that he had any evidence about the parts played by Mardonius<br />

and Artabanus in the innermost councils of the King. But there is no<br />

need to ask why empires expand. Extension of power is the natural<br />

consequence of power. No less than Rome, Persia aspired to imperium<br />

sine fine and from the moment that the expedition was mounted against<br />

Naxos in 499 it was plain that Greece would face invasion. 1<br />

Herodotus did not entirely concur, and the view that the Persian<br />

invasion was inspired by Athenian help for the Ionian Revolt is freely<br />

expressed in his book. Mardonius is made to argue that not only would<br />

Greece be a desirable acquisition but also the King must punish Athens<br />

and dissuade anyone else from attacking his land; Xerxes responds<br />

in similar terms (7. 5. 2, 3 and 8p i). Likewise, the Spartans in winter<br />

480/479 are made to assert that the invasion was caused by Athens (8.<br />

142. 2). All this reflects perhaps no more than Greek wrangling, and is<br />

of no great consequence. But it is a serious question whether the invasion<br />

of 490, for which Herodotus provides in part the same motivation<br />

(6. 94. i), was indeed of limited scope and directed at the punishment<br />

of Athens and Eretria for their part in the raid on Sardis. If the expedition<br />

of Datis and Artaphernes, which ended ingloriously at Marathon,<br />

had succeeded in its aim, would no more have ensued than that the<br />

Athenians would have shared the fate of the Eretrians, deportation to<br />

a remote place in Asia, or would Athens have been made the base for<br />

the Persian conquest of Greece and the capital of a new satrapy?<br />

The answer would seem to be provided by Herodotus' report of<br />

Darius sendingmessengers to Greek cities to demand 'earth and water',<br />

the tokens of submission. Darius is presented as wishing to subject those<br />

Greeks who refused (6. 94. i). They included, it later emerges, not just<br />

Athens but also Sparta (7.133. i). No other mainland states are named,<br />

though the Aeginetans and 'the other islanders' submitted (6. 49. i, 99.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!