05.06.2013 Views

NATHAN MYHRVOLD PhD ORAL HISTORY - The Computerworld ...

NATHAN MYHRVOLD PhD ORAL HISTORY - The Computerworld ...

NATHAN MYHRVOLD PhD ORAL HISTORY - The Computerworld ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

So Office 97, our office productivity package, it includes word processing and spread<br />

sheet data base that has a grammar checker developed by our national language<br />

group. It’s the best grammar checker in the world. It’s the first one that corrects<br />

your grammar while you type. And I would like to highlight this one because they<br />

call these programs word processors, but until Office ‘97, they weren’t word<br />

processors, they were character processors. <strong>The</strong>y helped you arrange characters on a<br />

page and get them lined up, but the program had no understanding that those strings<br />

of characters were words, that those words were organized into sentences and<br />

paragraphs, and that there was structure meaning. What we need the computer to<br />

be is not just your scribe in helping you remember where the characters go.<br />

Computers should be your copy editors, your partner in writing that helps you<br />

understand the deep structure of language and it helps apply that to something.<br />

That’s really what it should be about, and that’s what it’s going to be about because<br />

we have a very strong set of research efforts supporting our product. This is true for<br />

a whole bunch of other projects, and our operating systems in games, every part of<br />

the company has really benefited, so we have both examples of doing great work and<br />

hiring great people, and having an effect with products.<br />

DA: That’s very interesting to hear your strategy. I’ve studied research<br />

organizations for a long time. One of the problems usually is the hand off. When<br />

the researcher develops this idea, he thinks it’s great, he publishes it, or hands it off,<br />

or writes a reports, and he goes to the next idea. And some people say, “No, you<br />

need to keep at the research, keep with the idea through product development, or<br />

use a certain kind of plan.” What is your plan for making that transition between<br />

research and product development?<br />

NM: I am proud to say we have no process for this. Most of the best things in life<br />

don’t have a formal process. Most people meet their spouse in some ad hoc basis.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re’s not some formal process where you apply, and you do this, and you do that.<br />

Most breakthroughs, although they may occur by people that have degrees, aren’t as<br />

a result of completing a certain number of degree requirements and then the<br />

breakthrough happens. And transferring technology from a research group over to<br />

products isn’t something that happens in any single mode either, at least not here.<br />

Sometimes it happens because Bill Gates or I will be reviewing a product group. We<br />

will know it went on into research and say, “Hey, you should go talk to those<br />

people.” Sometimes it happens the other way around. We tell the researchers, “You<br />

should go see if someone wants to use this.” But it also happens because people are<br />

friends. <strong>The</strong>y get together in the hallways, or someone says, “Hey, let’s have lunch,<br />

and let’s discuss it.”<br />

Nathan Myhrvold<br />

Oral History<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!