05.06.2013 Views

It's CAME; We saw; Did it Conquer? – A review of the Cognitive ...

It's CAME; We saw; Did it Conquer? – A review of the Cognitive ...

It's CAME; We saw; Did it Conquer? – A review of the Cognitive ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

At <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> academic year 2003/2004 four schools had completed <strong>the</strong> two year<br />

pilot project. A sample, to participate in <strong>the</strong> pilot study, <strong>of</strong> one grammar school and<br />

one non-grammar school was made by <strong>the</strong> BELB from <strong>the</strong> in<strong>it</strong>ial group <strong>of</strong> four<br />

schools. A control sample <strong>of</strong> two non-<strong>CAME</strong> schools, one grammar and one nongrammar,<br />

was chosen by <strong>the</strong> BELB.<br />

W<strong>it</strong>hin each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> four schools participating in <strong>the</strong> pilot study, two year 9 classes<br />

were administered <strong>the</strong> ‘Myself as a Learner Standardised Scale’ (MAL) (2002).<br />

Burden (2000) perceives this as an information ga<strong>the</strong>ring instrument and comments<br />

that adolescents have responded pos<strong>it</strong>ively to <strong>the</strong> nature and purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>it</strong>. The results<br />

were in<strong>it</strong>ially analysed using <strong>the</strong> MAL scale suggested by Burden. Fur<strong>the</strong>r analysis<br />

using <strong>the</strong> Mann-Wh<strong>it</strong>ney U-test was <strong>the</strong>n carried out. This is an inferential nonparametric<br />

test for significance and <strong>it</strong> was deemed appropriate for this data because <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>it</strong>s su<strong>it</strong>abil<strong>it</strong>y for data w<strong>it</strong>h a small sample size and where <strong>the</strong>re may not be a normal<br />

distribution.<br />

In add<strong>it</strong>ion, each school provided <strong>the</strong> researchers w<strong>it</strong>h a small group <strong>of</strong> approximately<br />

six pupils who participated in a taped group interview. As <strong>the</strong> interviewees were<br />

children <strong>it</strong> was hoped that <strong>the</strong> group interview would be less intimidating and would<br />

encourage a variety <strong>of</strong> ideas and responses. The interview questions were presented in<br />

a standardised semi-structured format.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> two <strong>CAME</strong> schools and <strong>the</strong> two control schools <strong>the</strong> class teachers participated<br />

in a standardised semi-structured taped interview. Prior to recording, <strong>the</strong> teachers<br />

were inv<strong>it</strong>ed to <strong>review</strong> <strong>the</strong> questions and where <strong>the</strong> researchers felt <strong>it</strong> appropriate, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

explored fur<strong>the</strong>r comments and issues raised by <strong>the</strong> teachers’ responses. In add<strong>it</strong>ion,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Head <strong>of</strong> Ma<strong>the</strong>matics in each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> schools was inv<strong>it</strong>ed to respond to issues<br />

relating to whole school policy matters.<br />

Results<br />

Teaching Methods<br />

The teaching staff in <strong>the</strong> schools participating in <strong>the</strong> <strong>CAME</strong> project felt that <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

teaching methods had been affected pos<strong>it</strong>ively by involvement. The use <strong>of</strong> group<br />

- 7 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!