Mapping sentence form onto meaning: The syntax–semantic interface

Gorrell, P., 1995. Syntax and Parsing. Cambridge Univ. Press,
Cambridge, England.
Gorrell, P, 1998. Syntactic analysis and reanalysis in sentence
processing. In: Fodor, J.D., Ferreira, F. (Eds.), Reanalysis in
Sentence Processing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,
NL.
Grodzinsky, Y., Friederici, A.D., 2006. NeuroImaging of syntax and
syntactic processing. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 16, 240–246.
Gunter, T.C., Stowe, L.A., Mulder, G., 1997. When syntax meets
semantics. Psychophysiology 34, 660–676.
Gunter, T.C., Friederici, A.D., Hahne, A., 1999. Brain responses
during sentence reading: visual input affects central processes.
NeuroReport 10, 3175–3178.
Gunter, T.C., Friederici, A.D., Schriefers, H., 2000. Syntactic gender
and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late
interaction. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12, 556–568.
Hagoort, P., 2003. Interplay between syntax and semantics during
sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic
and semantic violations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15, 883–899.
Hagoort, P., Brown, C., 1999. Gender electrified: ERP evidence oil
the syntactic nature of gender processing. J. Psycholinguist.
Res. 28, 715–728.
Hagoort, P., Brown, C., Groothusen, J., 1993. The syntactic positive
shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Lang.
Cogn. Processess 8, 439–483.
Hagoort, P., Brown, C.M., Osterhout, L., 1999. The neurocognition of
syntactic processing. In: Brown, C.M., Hagoort, P. (Eds.), The
Neurocognition of Language. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford,
pp. 273–316.
Hagoort, P., Wassenaar, M., Brown, C.A., 2003. Syntax-related
ERP-effects in Dutch. Brain Res. 16, 38–50.
Hahne, A., Friederici, A.D., 1999. Electrophysiological evidence for
two steps in syntactic analysis: early automatic and late
controlled processes. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11, 194–205.
Hahne, A., Friederici, A.D., 2002. Differential task effects on
semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. Brain
Res. 13, 339–356.
Hemforth, B., Konjeczny, L. (Eds.), 2000. German Sentence
Processing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Jackendoff, R., 2002. The mind doesn’t work that way: the scope
and limits of computational psychology. Language 78, 164–170.
Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., Holcomb, P., 2000. The P600 as an
index of syntactic integration difficulty. Lang. Cogn. Proc. 15,
159–201.
Kemmer, L., Kutas, M., 2006. Salience of grammatical violations,
but not verb (ir)regularity, affects the P600: an event-related
brain potential study. J. Cong. Neurosci. 125.
Knösche, T., Maess, B., Friederici, A.D., 1999. Processing of
syntactic information monitored by brain surface current
density mapping based on MEG. Brain Topogr. 12, 75–87.
Kubota, M., Ferrari, P., Robert, T.P.L., 2004. Human neuronal
encoding of English syntactic violations as revealed by both L1
and L2 speakers. Neurosci. Lett. 368, 235–240.
Kuperberg, G.R., 2007. Neural mechanisms of language
comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Res. 1146, 23–49.
Kuperberg, G.R., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D., Holcomb, P.J., 2003.
Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual
relationships within simple sentences. Brain Res. 17,
117–129.
Kuperberg, G.R., Kreher, D., Blais, K., Caplan, D., Holcomb, P., 2005.
Semantic influences on syntactic processing: evidence from
event-related potentials. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 29.
Kutas, M., Federmeier, K.D., 2000. Electrophysiology reveals
semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends
Cogn. Sci. 4, 463–470.
Kutas, M., Hillyard, S.A., 1980. Reading senseless sentences:
brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 207,
203–205.
Kutas, M., Hillyard, S.A., 1983. Event-related brain potentials to
B R A I N R E S E A R C H 1 1 4 6 ( 2 0 0 7 ) 5 0 – 5 8
grammatical errors and semantic anomalies. Mem. Cogn. 11,
539–550.
Kutas, M., Van Petten, C., 1994. Psycholinguistics electrified.
Event-related brain potential investigations. In: Gernsbacher,
M.A. (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Academic Press, San
Diego, pp. 83–143.
Lau, E., Stroud, C., Plesch, S., Philips, C., 2006. The role of structural
prediction in rapid syntactic analysis. Brain Lang. 98, 74–88.
Li, X., Shu, H., Liu, Y.Y., Li, P., in press. Mental representation of
verb meanings: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
J. Cogn. Neurosci.
MacDonald, M.C., Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A., 1992. Working
memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity.
Cognit. Psychol. 24, 56–98.
MacDonald, M.C., Pearlmutter, N.J., Seidenberg, M.S., 1994a.
Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychol. Rev.
101, 676–703.
MacDonald, M.C., Pearlmutter, N.J., Seidenberg, M.S., 1994b.
Syntactic ambiguity resolution as lexical ambiguity resolution.
In: Clifton Jr., C., Frazier, L., Rayner, K. (Ed.), Perspectives on
Sentence Processing. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale,
NJ, pp. 123–154.
Marslen-Wilson, W.D., Tyler, L.K., 1980. The temporal structure of
spoken language understanding. Cognition 8, 1–71.
McClelland, R.J., St.John, M., Taraban, R., 1989. An interaction
model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account
of basic findings. Lang. Cogn. Processes 4, 287–336.
Mitchell, D.C., 1994. Sentence parsing. In: Gernsbacher, M.A. (Ed.),
Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Academic Press, San Diego,
pp. 375–409.
Mueller, J.L., Hahne, A., Fujii, Y., Friederici, A.D., 2005. Native and
nonnative speakers’ processing of a miniature version of
Japanese as revealed by ERPs. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17,
1229–1244.
Münte, T.F., Heinze, H.J., Mangun, G.R., 1993. Dissociation of brain
activity related to syntactic and semantic aspects of language.
J. Cogn. Neurosci. 5, 335–344.
Münte, T.F., Szentkuti, A., Wieringa, B.M., Matzke, M., Johannes, S.,
1997. Human brain potentials to reading syntactic errors in
sentences of different complexity. Neurosci. Lett. 235,
105–108.
Neville, H., Nicol, J.L., Barss, A., Forster, K.I., Garrett, M.F., 1991.
Syntactically based sentence processing classes—Evidence
from event-related brain potentials. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 3,
151–165.
Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P.J., 1993. Event-related potentials and
syntactic anomaly—Evidence of anomaly detection during
the perception of continuous speech. Lang. Cogn. Proc. 8,
413–437.
Osterhout, L., Mobley, L.A., 1995. Event-related brain potentials
elicited by failure to agree. J. Mem. Lang. 34, 739–773.
Osterhout, L., Nicol, J., 1999. On the distinctiveness, independence,
and time course of the brain responses to syntactic and
semantic anomalies. Lang. Cogn. Proc. 14, 283–317.
Penke, M., Weyerts, H., Gross, M., Zander, E., Münte, T.F., Clahsen,
H., 1997. How the brain processes complex words: an
event-related potential study of German verb inflections. Brain
Res. 6, 37–52.
Rossi, S., Gugler, M.F., Hahne, A., Friederici, A.D., 2005. When word
category information encounters morphosyntax: an ERP study.
Neurosci. Lett. 384, 228–233.
Rösler, F., Pütz, P., Friederici, A.D., Hahne, A., 1993. Event-related
brain potentials while encountering semantic and syntactic
constraint violations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 5, 345–362.
Schlesewsky, M., Bornkessel, I., 2004. On incremental
interpretation: degrees of meaning accessed during sentence
comprehension. Lingua 114, 1213–1234.
Silva-Pereyra, J., Carreiras, M., 2006. An ERP study of PHI-features
in Spanish. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 130.
57