PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY
PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY
PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
188 B. M. HONIGBERG<br />
tion among different members. One pattern (exemplified by Naegleria)<br />
is characterized by the lobose pseudopodia encountered in amebae<br />
of the subclass Lobosia. Another pattern (exemplified by Dimorpha<br />
and other helioflagellates) is marked by typical axopodia terminating<br />
internally in a central granule or centroplast, as in heliozoa<br />
of the order Centrohelida. Future studies can be expected to lead to<br />
a more natural regrouping of the forms placed here for convenience.""<br />
As might have been expected, the order RHIZOMASTIGIDA was omitted<br />
from the more recent scheme published by L e v i n e et al. (1980). Actually,<br />
the constitution of this "order" has varied among the standard<br />
protozoology texts; e.g., Hall (1953) included the following genera<br />
among RHIZOMASTIGIDA: Histomonas, Heliobodo, Mastigamoeba, Mastigella,<br />
Mastigina and Rhizomastix. Amon other workers, he felt also<br />
that Pteridomonas was a chrysomonad and that Actinomonas and Dimorpha<br />
had helioflagellate affinities. Grasse (1952) thought that Pteridomonas<br />
was also a helioflagellate. Many authors (e.g., Kudo 1966)<br />
included Tetramitus and Naegleria in RHIZOMASTIGIDA. Certain protozoologists<br />
assigned at least some of the rhizomastigid genera to many<br />
flagellate and rhizopod assemblages. Vickerman, who until recently<br />
(Vickerman 1976) considered Cercomonas and Heteromita as BO-<br />
DON<strong>IN</strong>A incertae sedis, included these two genera in his discussion of<br />
zooflagellates at the 1981 session in Warsaw. According to him (V i ck<br />
e r m a n, personal communication): Cercomonas and Heteromita are<br />
clearly related to each other and sufficiently distinct from both chrysomonads<br />
and sarcodines to merit a separate small order. Accordingly,<br />
using the characteristics presented by him at the 1981 Congress, I propose<br />
to create, with Vickerman as the sole authority, a new<br />
order among MASTIGOPHORA.<br />
Order CERCOMONADIDA Vickerman<br />
Two heterodynamic acronematic flagella whose kinetosomes cap cone<br />
of microtubules closely enveloping drawn out anterior part of nucleus;<br />
cone apparently attached to nucleus; microtubules, some lying along<br />
nucleus, not all subpellicular (as in Kinetoplastida)-, single, membranebounded,<br />
postnuclear organelle of unknown function loosely capping<br />
posterior part of nucleus; extrusomes resembling haptocysts of heliozoans<br />
often associated with surface microtubule tracks; several mitochondria<br />
with tubular cristae; food ingestion by pseudopodia; contractile vacuole<br />
usually postnuclear, may be adbasal (as in Kinetoplastida).<br />
Cercomonas, Heteromita<br />
Some of the former members of RHIZOMASTIGIDA can be now<br />
assigned to known flagellate and rhizopod taxa, and this is reflected in<br />
http://rcin.org.pl