PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY

More documents

Recommendations

Info

218 B. M. HONIGBERG Taylor F. J. R. 1976: Flagellate phytogeny: a study (of comilicts. J. Protozool., 23, 28-40. Taylor F. J. R. 1978: Problems in the development of an explicit phylogeny of lower eukaryotes. BioSystems, 10, 67-89. Taylor F. J. R. 1980: On dimoflagedlate evolution. BioSystems 13, 65-108. Tuzet O., Maurand J., Fize A., Michel R. and Fen wick B. 1971: Proposition d'un nouveau cadre systématique pour les genres de Microsporidies. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 272, 1268-1271. Vickerman K. 1976: The diversity of the kinetoplastid flagellates, (eds. L u m sden W. H. R. and Evans D. A.). In: Biology of the Kinetoplastida, Academic Press, New York and London, 1, 1-34. Wo 1 ska M. 1971: Studies on the family Blepharocorythidae Hsiung. VI. Phylogenesis of the family and the description of the new genus Circodinium gen. n. with the species C. minimum (Gassovsky, 1918). Acta Protozool., 9, 171-194. http://rcin.org.pl
PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY Proceedings of VI International Congress of Protozoology Special Congress Volume of ACTA PROTOZOOLOGICA part II, pp. 219-221, 1984 Round Table Discussion Appendix The Taxonomic Position of Euglenida parasitica W. MICHAJLOW Institute of Parasitology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Pasteura 3, 02-093 Warszawa, Poland I should like to make some remarks, on the taxonomic and systematic problems of flagellates. I am concerned specifically with euglenids parasitic in copepods, which I have studied since 1955. This group, to which I refer under the designation of "Euglenida parasitica", contains now 128 species. It can be assumed that in the future there will be described additional species, the total number being thus doubled or tripled. Euglenida parasitica is a biologic rather than a systematic grouping. Species, genera, and even families of these euglenids can belong to various taxonomic units within the order Euglenida. This indicates that Euglenida parasitica is a polyphyletic assemblage. First of all I would like to join Prof. Poljansky in his opinion, presented in his excellent paper, that there exists a possibility and, indeed, a necessity for determination of species as basic biologic units also among protozoa which undergo exclusively asexual reproduction. In determination of the Euglenida parasitica species the employment of exclusively morphological criteria does not suffice, elthough the significance of these criteria cannot be overlooked. I am certain that many euglenid species described, for example by Skuja or Skovortzova as well as by other authors who based their determinations exclusively on morphologic attributes of flagellated forms swimming in water, will be identified as parasitic organisms after more complete observations of their developmental cycles. Paper presented at Round Table Discussion on July 11 at VI International Congress of Protozoology, Warsaw, Poland 5-11 July 1981. http://rcin.org.pl
Page 1 and 2: POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES NENCKI I
Page 3 and 4: PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY Proceeding
Page 5 and 6: INTRODUCTORY REMARKS This Part II o
Page 9 and 10: 183 In his abstract Mignot (1981) s
Page 11 and 12: PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PR
Page 13 and 14: 187 algae by phycologists (Bourelly
Page 21 and 22: 195 The foregoing subdivisions of A
Page 35 and 36: 209 vine et al. 1980), there is no
Page 39 and 40: 213 evidence for the assumption of
Page 41 and 42: REFERENCES 215 Bardele C. F. 1977:
Page 43: PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PR
Page 47 and 48: THE TAXONOMIC POSITION OF EVGLENIDA
Page 51 and 52: 225 brate cycle in vitro. Further c
Page 53 and 54: 227 could support the development o
Page 55 and 56: 229 for the development of methods
Page 57 and 58: IN VITRO CULTIVATION OF PARASITIC P
Page 59 and 60: Malaria IN VITRO CULTIVATION OF PAR
Page 61 and 62: IN VITRO CULTIVATION OF PARASITIC P
Page 63 and 64: 237 Rai Choudhuri A. N.. Chowdhuri
Page 67 and 68: 241 Only those with 9-type 1 fronto
Page 71 and 72: THE MOLECULAR DIVERSITY OF TETRAHYM
Page 73 and 74: 247 in eukaryotes. It is about the
Page 75 and 76: Table 2 Mating species of Tetrahyme
Page 83 and 84: Table 8 Percentage of DNA reanneali
Page 85 and 86: 259 pattern; they do confirm our ju
Page 89 and 90: Table 13 Two-dimensional electropho
Page 91 and 92: 265 Cuny M., Milet M. and Hayes D.
Page 95 and 96:
MEMBRANE FUSIONS IN PROTOZOA 269 It
Page 97 and 98:
Table 1 Characterization of exocyto
Page 99 and 100:
Fig. 3. Freeze fractured trichocyst
Page 101 and 102:
* 1 ^MBBHBBHBBBBI jgf'- Fig. 5. Tan
Page 103 and 104:
273 the preliminary designation "co
Page 105 and 106:
MEMBRANE FUSIONS IN PROTOZOA 275 ba
Page 107 and 108:
277 B i 1 i n s k i M., Plattner H.
Page 109 and 110:
LIST OF SCIENTIFIC REPORTS presente
Page 111 and 112:
281 structure and cytochemistry of
Page 113 and 114:
283 LIST OF SCIENTIFIC REPORTS A. P
Page 115 and 116:
285 LIST OF SCIENTIFIC REPORTS R. G
Page 117 and 118:
287 LIST OF SCIENTIFIC REPORTS K. G
Page 119 and 120:
LIST OF SCIENTIFIC REPORTS 289 R. A
Page 121 and 122:
291 LIST OF SCIENTIFIC REPORTS magn
Page 123 and 124:
293 Co-Chairman: Jan Kućera, Czech
Page 125 and 126:
295 LIST OF SCIENTIFIC REPORTS for
Page 127 and 128:
PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY Proceeding
Page 129 and 130:
INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION AMONG P
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
http://rcin.org.pl
Page 141 and 142:
LONDON 1965 http://rcin.org.pl
Page 143 and 144:
LENINGRAD 1969 http://rcin.org.pl
Page 145 and 146:
CLERMONT-FERRAND 1973 http://rcin.o
Page 147 and 148:
WARSAW 1981 http://rcin.org.pl
Page 149:
CONTENTS Introductory Remarks 179 B
show all

PROGRESS IN PROTOZOOLOGY

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?