Arthur Drews - PDF Wikipedia Aug. 23, 2012 PAGES - Radikalkritik

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Berlin Zoological Garden Zoologischer Garten Berlin The Elephant Gate entrance Drews led a militant campaign for his book, supported by the National Association of Free Religion Societies, and The National Association of Monists. which organized a huge debate on Jan 31 and Feb 1, 1910 in the Berlin Zoological Garden between monists and liberal theologians including Baron von Soden of the Berlin University. Attended by 2,000 people, including the country's most eminent theologians, the meetings went on until three in the morning. The New York Times called it "one of the most remarkable theological discussions" since the days of Martin Luther, reporting that Drews's supporters caused a sensation by plastering the town's billboards with posters asking, Did Jesus Christ ever live? According to the newspaper his arguments were so graphic that several women had to be carried from the hall screaming hysterically, while one woman stood on a chair and invited God to strike him down.[15][16] On Feb 20, 1910, a counter confrontation took place in the Bush Circus. The following year, on March 12, 1911 another follow-up debate was organized.[17] Universal Condemnation by Professional Theologians - A Sense of Crisis
Mangasar Magurditch Mangasarian, The Truth About Jesus, Is He A Myth?, 1909 In Christ Myth II (1912), Drews describes the cultural commotion: Now the whole Press is engaged against the disturber of the peace...Opposing lectures and Protestant meetings are organised, and J. Weiss publicly declares that the author of the book has no right to be taken seriously. But among his fellows, within the four walls of the lecture-hall, and in the printed version of his lectures, Weiss assures his readers that he has taken the matter 'very seriously', and speaks of the fateful hour through which our [theological] science is passing. [emphasis added] Most significant theologian scholars immediately felt the need to take up the challenge and entered the debate sparked off by Drews's Christ Myth about the Historicity of Jesus. Most of the responses world-wide by theologians were violently negative and critical.
Page 1 and 2: Arthur Drews Arthur Drews Christian
Page 3 and 4: an awakening for a German Faith, an
Page 5 and 6: Osiris on a lapis lazuli pillar in
Page 8 and 9: Contents 1 The Christ Myth (1909) 1
Page 10 and 11: 5.9.2 Engels's Article On the Histo
Page 12 and 13: The Christ Myth (1909) Along with B
Page 14 and 15: German from 1890 to 1904[7]), who s
Page 16 and 17: 3. Mixed with the patterns of Persi
Page 18 and 19: Raphaël, Transfiguration of Christ
Page 22 and 23: But Drews had some quality supporte
Page 24 and 25: Albert Schweitzer, The Quest of the
Page 26 and 27: the validity of the supernatural, m
Page 28 and 29: convenient, but imprecise journalis
Page 30 and 31: George Albert Wells, Did Jesus Exis
Page 32 and 33: R. Joseph Hoffmann, The New Oxonian
Page 34 and 35: Richard C. Carrier, Proving History
Page 36 and 37: Hoffmann has mentioned that Bart D.
Page 38 and 39: esulted in a long string of Lives o
Page 40 and 41: 4. Talmud: offers no contemporary r
Page 42 and 43: Farnese Hercules, a Roman copy from
Page 44 and 45: Women at the empty tomb, by Fra Ang
Page 46 and 47: "in order to convince Peter that he
Page 48 and 49: Bronzino's depiction of the Crucifi
Page 50 and 51: Sermon on the Mount, by Carl Bloch
Page 52 and 53: (a) The Tradition of the Words of t
Page 54 and 55: Psalm 22:1-8 in St. Albans Psalter
Page 56 and 57: [Ch. 8, "Historians and the Gospels
Page 58 and 59: Albert Schweitzer, 1952 Nobel portr
Page 60 and 61: Bruno Bauer, German founder of the
Page 62 and 63: (contrary to F.C. Baur and Tübinge
Page 64 and 65: Review of Other Historicity Deniers
Page 66 and 67: Redeemer. Scholars like Harnack rel
Page 68 and 69: Ludwig Feuerbach - God did not crea
Page 70 and 71:
Bruno Bauer had started as a studen
Page 72 and 73:
A contemporary drawing of Karl Marx
Page 74 and 75:
Bauer published a pamphlet Die Jude
Page 76 and 77:
Friedrich Engels, a founding partne
Page 78 and 79:
question of the historical origin o
Page 80 and 81:
etween is not possible. In this era
Page 82 and 83:
favor of...Monism...known as Panthe
Page 84 and 85:
Wells, for instance, saw Jesus as a
Page 86 and 87:
Portrait of Friedrich Nietzsche by
Page 88 and 89:
Eduard von Hartmann, whose Unconsci
Page 90 and 91:
■ And the revolution of Darwinism
Page 92 and 93:
eplaced by God-mankind, an adaptati
Page 94 and 95:
confiding in the divine control of
Page 96 and 97:
concepts that he felt were bastardi
Page 98 and 99:
Drews himself explains in The Denia
Page 100 and 101:
■ The Myth of Mary (1928): which
Page 102 and 103:
harangue the crowds. But, in his ac
Page 104 and 105:
This trend is described in the book
Page 106 and 107:
With the National Socialist Party's
Page 108 and 109:
Harnack, a result of the splitting
Page 110 and 111:
■ Blood and Soil [Blut und Boden]
Page 112 and 113:
Drews, an elitist thinker in the He
Page 114 and 115:
situation in Germany. The philosoph
Page 116 and 117:
led to the final destruction of the
Page 118 and 119:
dilettantism [Abweichungen von der
Page 120 and 121:
And he gained the esteem of van den
Page 122 and 123:
■ Nietzsche als Antipode Wagners,
Page 124 and 125:
17. ^ Kernprobleme der Gegenwart. B
Page 126 and 127:
■ Thomas L. Thompson and Thomas V
Page 128 and 129:
62. ^ "The Witness of Tradition" 63
Page 130 and 131:
106.^ Jacob Golomb et Robert S. Wis
Page 132 and 133:
External links ■ The Christ Myth
show all

Arthur Drews - PDF Wikipedia Aug. 23, 2012 PAGES - Radikalkritik

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?