17.06.2013 Views

Benfield, J.A., Nurse, G.A., Jakubowski, R., Gibson, A., Taff, D ...

Benfield, J.A., Nurse, G.A., Jakubowski, R., Gibson, A., Taff, D ...

Benfield, J.A., Nurse, G.A., Jakubowski, R., Gibson, A., Taff, D ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Benfield</strong> et al. 11<br />

problematic to the visit. Participants also rated the acceptability of hearing<br />

aircraft overflights during their visit based on varying amounts of temporal<br />

frequency (i.e., every 5, 15, 30, or 60 min).<br />

Procedure. Participants were recruited from the Bear Lake trailhead in Colorado’s<br />

Rocky Mountain National Park by selecting every nth person (dependent<br />

on daily visitor volume). These participants were asked to complete the<br />

survey packet containing the demographics, NSS-SF, and park visitor questionnaire.<br />

After completing the study, participants were debriefed regarding the<br />

purposes of the study. All surveying took place between August 9 and August<br />

13, 2010; 67% of potential participants agreed to take part in the research.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Correlations were run between the NSS-SF score, and the ratings for the<br />

problematic noises and the aircraft noise frequency acceptability. Those relationships<br />

are given in Table 3. Generally, higher NSS-SF scores related to<br />

lower ratings of frequent aircraft overflight acceptability and higher ratings<br />

of most sounds as being problematic to visitation.<br />

However, these findings are not necessarily based on exposure to actual<br />

noise. Visitors to the national park reported certain sounds as being less<br />

acceptable or more problematic, but this could reflect attitudinal preferences<br />

more than the individual response to the actual problematic presence of those<br />

sounds. Nonetheless, the theoretically consistent relationship between noise<br />

sensitivity and individual attitudes toward different sounds in context does<br />

provide evidence that the NSS-SF performs in a manner consistent with theory<br />

and its longer counterpart.<br />

Study 5<br />

A fifth and final study was run to test the relationship NSS-SF score has with<br />

responses to actual sound exposure in a different sample of national park<br />

visitors. It was hoped that surveying park visitor responses to a controlled set<br />

of auditory stimuli while including the NSS-SF would provide sufficient<br />

evidence when combined with the other studies to support the scale’s use in<br />

future noise research.<br />

Method<br />

Participants. Sample demographics are reported in Table 1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!