4 - Hanford Site

AR TARGET SHEET
The following document was.too large to scan as one
unit, therefore it has been broken down into sections.
DOCUMENT # -- -IDO C / l?- L -F
EDMC # i 3^ 15 39
SECTION Z . ,.OF-

THIS IMAGE INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK

s^.
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
APPENDIX D-1
WELL CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAMS
APP Dl—i

Cy
n
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1
2
3
4
5 This page intentionally left blank.
APP D1-ii

M
LL
0
Construction Diagram
• n. Protective Lockable
Casing
Cap
Pad
,X , „Guard Posts
4• inch Stainless
Steel Casing
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Lithologic Diagram
100 Silty Sand to
Gravelly Sand
120
140
160 —
180 —
260
220
Silty Sandy Gravel
320 [
340 8• in. Telescoping ,
10-Slot Stainless
Steel Screen
44n., 20-Slot
Stainless Steel
Screen
L^ r^ Slightly Silty Gravelly Sand
Sandy Gravel
"—'-Siltv
—!Z— Water Level Sentonite Pallets Sand
Cement Grout
Granular Sernonite
Silica Sand
Gravel
Well 299-E18-1
APP DI-1
silt
% moisture
% CaCO3
0102030 0246810 0
It —
20
— 40
60
80
100
120
140
160
f8o
O
200 0
3:
220
240
280
300
320
340

w
-Y
0
Con
20 Pad
40
60
80
100
120
i 140
N
g 160
e
G
180 —
a
m
m 200
280
300
320
340
Poets
4-Inch Stsinler
Stew Casing
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Construction Diagram Lithologic Diagram
64n. Protective Lockable
8-in. Telescoping
10-Slot Stainless
Stew Swoon
_ 6/ea4_
Silty Sand to
Gravelly Sand
Silty Sandy Gravel
4in., 20•Slat '•p`6 Slightly 9 Y Silty h GravellyY
Stainless Stew
Sand to Slightly Gravelly
Screen Sand
—3Z_ Water Level Bentonite Pellets Sand
Cement Grout Silica Sand Silt
®
Granular Ben[oni[e op Gravel
Well 299-E18-2
APP D1-2
Moisture %CaCO3
0102030 0246810 0
20
40
60
80
140
160
Y
wo g
0
200 r; s
z2o m
m
240 i
260
280
320
340

C%$
r"k
-^ a
m-
140
N
9
] 160
O
5
teo
s
m 2W
LL
0
20
40
60
80
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Construction Diagram Uthologic Diagram
6-in. Protec tive Lockable
` 10-Slot Stainless
Ste el Screen
Silty Sand to
Gravelly Sand
Silty Sandy Gravel
to Sandy Gravel
Slightly Silly
Gravelly Sand
Water Level Bentonite Pellets Sand
Cement Grout Silica Sand 8 Silt
Granular Bentonite 6p0 Gravel
Well 299-E18-3
APP D1-3
Moisture %CaCO3
0102030 0246810 0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
d
180 g
]
0
200 t7
3
220 m m
m
240 i
260
280
300
320
340

u
0
100
120
3 140
N
a
3 60
0
N
1 00
0
2w
240
260
2130
DOE/RL 88-41
`kievision 1
Construction Diagram Lithologic Diagram
6-in. Protective Lockable
Casing Cap
t Guard Posts
Pad
C 8- in. Telmoping,
10-Slot Stainle ss
Steel Screen
stainless 61961
Sartori
Slightly Silly Sand to
Gravelly Sand
Silty Sandy Gravel
_4 Water Level eantonite Pellets ':itr» Sand
Ppp
Cement Grout SOica Send _ _^ Silt
Granular Bentonite o°p Gravel
Well 299-E18-4
APP D1-4
Moisture % CaCO3
0102030 0246810 0
27
40
60
80
100
140
160 m`
N
+so 8
0
200 ^
ie
220 m
d
240 2
260
280
300
320
340

-;w
1^m
1
2
3
4
5
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
APPENDIX 0-2
GROUNDWATER DATA
APP D2-i

Gt':
t
r°±
A.
n
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1
2
3
4
5 This page intentionally left blank.
APP D2-ii

Table D2-1. Summary of Sampling Results for the 2101-M Pond, August 1988. (sheet 1 of 4)
--------------------------------- - ----- Constituent List=Contamination Indicator Parameters ---------------------------- -- -- -
Constituent Detection Oslo. Drinking Water Standards
Code Name Units iimit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full name
oas CONDLAB umbo 16 0 700 WDOE Specific conductance, laboratory
191 COHDFLD umho 1 16 0 700 WDOE xxx Sppecific conductance, field
199 PIIFIELD
0.1 16
0
6.6-8.6 EPAS
pH, field
207 Pli -LAB 0.01 16
0
6.6 -6.6 EPAS
pptl, laboratory
C69 TOC ppb 1000 16 0 Total organic carbon
H42 TO%LDI- ppb 20 IB 0 Total organic halogens, Ia. DL
-------------- -r.-------------------------- Constituent List=Drinking Water Parameters -----------------------------------------
Constituent Detection Below Drinklny Wa Nr Standards
Code Name Units Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full name
109 COLIFRM MPH 2.2 1 1 •e• 1 EPA Coliform bacteria p
v 111 BETA pCi/L 8 1 0 60 EPA Gross beta m m
161 RADIUM pCi/L 1 1 0 6 EPA Total radium

Dv
9! I E: 0? 7
Table D2-1. Summary of Sampling Results for the 2101-M Pond, August 1988. (sheet 2 of 4)
-------------------- ------------------ ------ Constituent List=Water Quality Parameter s ___________________________
Constituent Detection Below Drinklnp Water Standards
Code Name Units Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full name
All SODIUM ppb 200 4 0 Sodium
All MANGESE ppb 5 4 0 60 EPAS xxx Manganese
A19 IRON ppb 30 4 0 300 EPAS xxx Iron
C13 SULFATE ppb 600 4 0 250000 EPAS Sulfate
CIS CHLORID ppb 600 4 0 260000 EPAS Chloride
H24 FSODIUM ppb 200 4 0 Sodlua, filtered
H29 FMANGAN ppb 6 4 2 60 EPAS was Manganese, filtered
H31 FIRON ppb" 30 4 0 300 EPAS Iron, filtered
1161 LPHENOL ppb to 4 4 •e• Phenol, low DL
--------------------------------- ------ Constituent List=Site Specific and Other Parameters ----------------------
Constituent Detection Below Drinking Water Standards
Code Name Units Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full name
A01 BERYLUM ppb 6 4 4 •se Beryllium m Mm
p A03 STRONUM ppb 20 4 0 Strontlum
ro < ^
604 Z INC ppb 6 4 1 5000 EPAS Zinc y
ro A06 CALCIUM ppb 50 4 0 Calcium -'
Al2 NICKEL ppb 10 4 0 Nickel 0 00
AI3 COPPER ppb 10 4 4 see 1300 EPAP Copper 1
A14 VANADUM ppb 6 4 1 Vanadium
A16 ANTIONY ppb 100 4 4 ese Antimony
A18 ALUMNUM ppb 160 4 3 Aluminum
A18 POTASUM ppb 100 4 0 Potassium
.
ASO YAGNES ppb 50 4 0 Magnesium
C76 PHOSPHA ppb 1000 4 4 so * Phosphate
H13 F ZINC ppb 6 4 2 6000 EPAS Zinc lilts, ad
H19 FCALCIU ppb 60 4 0 Calcium, filtered
H26 FNICKEL ppb 10 4 3 Nickel, filtered
H26 FCOPPER ppb 10 4 4 see 1300 EPAP Copper, filtered
H21 FVANADI ppb 6 4 1 , Vanadium, filtered
H29 FALUMIN ppb 160 4 4 •eo Aluminum, filtered
H30 FPOTASS ppb 100 4 0 Pota ss ium, filtered
1132 FMAGNES ppb 60 4 0 Magnesium, filtered
1133 FBERYLL ppb 6 4 4 see Beryllium, filtered
1136 F57RONT ppb 20 4 0 Strontium, filtered
U36 FANTIMO ppb 100 4 4 see Antimony, filtered
* so - Indicates all samples were reported as below contractual detection limits
xxx - Indicates that Drinking Water Standards were exceeded
EPA - based on Maximum Contaminant Levels ? Ivan In 40 CFR Part 141 (July,1987)
National Primary Drinking Water Rego stlons as •mended b}}' 62 FR 26690
EPAR - based on National Interim Primary Drinking Water BeguI tlone.
Appendix IV, EPA-670/9-1E-003
EPAP - based on proposed Maximum Contaminant level Goals In 60 FR 40936
EPAS - based on Secondary Maximum Contaminant levels given in 40 (FR Part 143
National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations

n
'o
v
O
N
w
F ` I - , r
Table D2-1. Summary of Sampling Results for the 2101-M Pond, August 1988. (sheet 3 of 4)
Quadruplicate Contamination InJicstor Paran.etw s
Duplicate CIOIDFI0
Well Callsction sample undo
fl ame Date number 1/700w
2-E18-1 16AUG88 912
1 812
2 911
3 809
2-EIB-2 18AUGSO 362
1 361
2 366
3 366
2-EIS-3 16AUG89 279
1 279
2 280
3 290
2-EIS-1 IGAUG98 303•
1 303
2 303
3 303
The column headers consist of : Constituent Name
Analysis Units
Contractual Detection Limit/Drinking Water Standard(suffix)
Suffix
none - based on Maximum Contaminant Levels given in 10 CFR Part 111 (July,1987)
National Primary Drinking Water Regulations as amended b y 62 FR 26890
r - based on National Interim Primary Drinking Water Re 9u 1•tl ons,
Appendlx 1V, EPA-670/9-10-003
P - based on proposed Maximum Contaminant Level Goals in 60 FR 18938
s - based on Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels given In 10 CFR Pert 113
(July, 1987) National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations
w - based on additional Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels given In
WAC 218-61, Public Water Supplies
Data flags
< - Less than Contractual Detection Limit, reported as Limit
1 - Less then Contractual Detection Limit, moasursd valve reported
a - For radioactive constituents, reported value L len than 2-sigma error
COIIDLAB PII-LAB PIIFIELD TOC TOXLDL
umho pyyb ppb
.1700. 0.01/8.6s 0.1/9.6 8 1000/. 20/.
631 7.9 7.8 632 11.3
631 1.9 1.0 890 11.6
629 1.9 7.9 302 11.1
621 1.9 7.9 1397 -1.8
261 8.6 7.9 311 1.7
219 0.0 1.9 366 -0.9
219 9. 8 1.9 717 -1.9
218 8.0 7.9 1643 19.9
Roo 8.0 7.9 610 12.9
200 0.0 7.9 631 113.7
201 3.0 7.9 198 37.2
201 8.0 1.9 1492 16.1
219 9.0 7.8 163 0.9
220 8.0 7.9 603 17.7
219 0.0 8.0 110
3.2
218 9.0 8.0 1a42 12.7
n
0
;U CD
m m
N ^
0 00
= 00

D
v
0
N
.P
Table D2-1. Summary of Sampling Results for the 2101-M Pond, August 1988. (sheet 4 of 4)
Duplicate ALPHA
Veit collection .ample pCl/L
name Date number 4/15
2410 . 1 16AUGBB. 2.210
2-EIB-2 16AUGBS- 0.416
2-E18. 3 16AUGH •0.352
2-EIB-4 16AUM 0.917
Duplicate CHLORID
Veit" Collection ample TO
[wn Date maber 500/25000
2-EIS-1 16AVGBS 6,550
2418. 2 16AVG88 2,060
2-Ell-3 WOMB 4,470
2-E18-4 16AUGBB 6,260
Duplicate MANGESE
Veil Collection ceople ppb
naoe Date n0nber 51503
2-EIS-1 16AUC83 70
2-EIB-2 16AU&M 6
2-EIS-3 HAUGH, 15
2-EIA-4 16AMBS 13
Duplicate SCDILH
Well Collection Smple ppb
name Oats mcber 2011.
2-EIB-1 16AUG88 • 28,700
2-EIB-2 16AUG88 •18,000
2-EIS-3 16AUG88 5,570
2-EIS-4 16AMS 6,010
AIIHNIH ARSENIC FARSENI BARIIH fOARIIH BETA ICAL CIII CALCIIH
ppb ppb Fpb "A, ppb pCIA ppb ppb
150/. 5150 5/50 6/1000 6/1010 8/50 50/. 50/.
351

a
v
V
0
N
cn
n
Table D2-2. Summary of Resampling Results for the 2101-M Pond, September 1988.
Standard List Constituents
I ALUM III AL1110111h AESFIIIC FARSE111 PARMA FUARIIIH HAIM Ili CAI1H111M 1'CALC111
Well Surle Uup
116 FIJI, ?IA, p^d. pill. ^pL gp t. pplet
Flame 031e rlllu IJ /. I1 /. 1/50 1/50 - 6, 600 6/1000 g/li, / 1 0 5b/.
2-E18-1 22SEPOB% it 0 if 54 10 it 11 Moo
2-EIB-2 22SEP88' D U 5 5 54 52 D U 25600
2-EI8-3 23SEP8B 1 D D 11 12 61 59 D D 31000
2-EIR-4 22SEP88 D 173 9 8 58 55 D D 31360
- 1 Well
1
53rple
Date nur ""
CALCIUM
^1Rpt,
W.
FCHRDHI
ppb
10/50
CHROHUN
"
10/50
COPPER
p PG
FCOPPER
p pG
IRAN
M'O'O
IF ROU
p 1,
HANES
L' pb
novae ]0/1300p 10/1300p 30s 301300;
2-EIB-1 22SEP88.
2-EIB-2 22SEPBB•
2-EI8-3 22SEPBB
2-EIB-4 22SEP88
72000
25400
29600
31000
D
D
D
D
104
87
67
159
It
D
D
D
0
D
D
1810
535
1440
1580
it
D
32
68
17000
6790
7900
8070
FHAGUES fMAN AN 11AUGESE HICHkL FUIC`EL FPOTASS POTASIIH FSLLEtll
E' SEIL.EHUM
Well Sawple Uup Rt, p
p
ppb pt,
L
name 03te fitim 1V /. 5/J0s 5/505 a/. f8 /. 188/, . 1D0:. 5 /10 J %l0
2-EIB-1 22SEPBB' 16500 19 46 48 It 7200 8.6 10
2-EIS-2 22SEPBB 6710 U 13 43 D 4930 5090 U It
2-EIB-3 32SEP80i 8080 D 22 35 D 5220 5140 D D
2-EIB-4 22SEPBB 8060 11 32 79 16 5570 5640 D U
SILVER FSILVER SODIUH FSODIUM FVAHADI VANA1111H ZINC FZ111C
Well Site Blip P pL ppt RR t, pr, R G ^Nl,
^,p1. ^a Apq r, G D L
Ar
n3ue 03te rluu IO/50 1U/10 2VV/. 2VV/. Y'l
1/. 1/1VOOs J/JV0 05
2-k18-1 22SEP88 , D D 28000 27400 D 5 73 46-
2--E18-2 22SEFOO , D D 17700 17300 18 19 D D
2-EIB-3 22SEFBB+ D U 5310 5360 27 36 34 D
2- L IB-4 22SEPBB 11 U 6760 6680 19 23 10 D
0
zo
m 0
r \
N f
0 00
OD
....ice

--------------------------------
Constituent Detection
Code Name Units Limit
096 CONDLAB ueho
191 COHDFLD umho 1
199 PHFIELD
0.1
201 PH-LAB 0.01
C69 IOC ppb 1000
H42 TOXLDL ppb 20
Table D2-3. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1988. (sheet 1 of 12)
Constituent tie L= Contsminstlen Indicator Parameters ------
Below
Drinkln Weter Standards
Samplea Ddectlon St andard Agency Exceeded Full name
16 0 700 000E Specific conductance, Isborsl..ey
24 0 700 ODOE ctance, II.,a
24 Q 6.6-9.6 EPAS ex. S11 p , cflic condu
1 6 0 6. 6 -6.6 EPAS pp1I laboratory
20 0 ToEe1 arganlc carbon
20 0 Iota) organic halogens. IoW OL
- Constituent List=Interim Primary Drinking Water Parameters ---------------------------
Constituent Detection I Islas Drinklnpp Water Standards
Code Name Units Limit Samples Del .action Standard Agency Exceeded Fuji name
109 COLIFRY MPH 2.2 4
ee. 1 EPA Collform bacte ria
111 BETA pCl /L 9 0 I II 60 -EPA Grose bets CD
191 RADIUM pCl/L 1 6 I I 6 'EPA Total radium
p 212 ALPHA pCl/L 4 a
I 1 6 EPA Gross alpha CD
ro AD$ BARIUM ppb a a 1 I 1000 EPA Barium
Gn A07 CADMIUM ppb 2 6
I 000 10 EPA Cadmium y
A09 CHROMUII ppb 30 a I I 6 0 EPA Chromium -+
ASO SILVER ppb 10 a I I e.s 60 EPA Silver
0 00
A20 ARSENIC ppb 6 a
0 EPA Arsenic ' 6
A21 MERCURY ppb 0.1 i
i so* 2 EPA Mercury .r.
A22 SELENUM ppb 6 0
10 EPA Selenium ^-+
ASS ENORIN ppb 0.1 i
i sea 0.2 EPA Endrin
• A34 IIETHLOR ppb 3 i
i esa 100 EPA Methoxychlor
A35 TOXAENE ppb 1 i
i sea 6 EPA Toxaphene
A3 4 •-BIIC ppb 0.1 6
i sea 4 EPA Linden:, alpha-BHC
AS7 ASS b-BHC ppb 0.1 i
sae 4 EPA Lindane, bete-BHC
3 -911C ppb 0.1 i
i •oo 4 EPA Lindane. ® smma-BIIC
AS d-BIIC ppb 0.1 6
i see 4 EPA Linden::011C
A61 LEADGF
60 EPA Lead (graphite furnace)
C72 NITRATE ppb 600 a
46000 EPA Nitrate
C74 FLUDRIO ppb 600 a
4000 EPA Fluoride
HIS 2,4-0 2 6
i e.0 100 EPA 2,4-D 2,4-Dlchlorophenoxyscetic acid]
1114 2,4 SIP ppb
2
6
..e 10 EPA 2,4 6- P s{Ivex
1120 FBAkTUM ppb
a
a I I
1000 EPA
Bar ^um, filtered
021 FCADMIU ppb 2 a i I u.
10 EPA Cadmium, filtered
1122 FCHROUI ppb 10 a
i 60 EPA Chromium filtered
U23 FSILVER ppb 10 a i I .e. 60 EPA Silver, fil tered
1137 FARSENI ppb i a
60 EPA Arsenic, filtered
1139 FMERCUR ppb 0.1 i
i ... 2 EPA Mercury, filtered
1139 FSELENI ppb 6 a
SO EPA Selenium (IltereJ
1141 FLEAD ppb 6 a i ... 60 EPA Lead, fl^tared

Y
Constituent Detection
Code None Units Limit
-gyp 106 TRITIUM pCl/L 600
N
1
ADS
A03
AOA
DERYLUM ppb
STRONUM ppb
ZINC ppb
6
20
6
v A06 CALCIUM ppb
Al2 NICKEL pp
Ali COPPER
60
10
A14 VADUM UA ppb 1 6
A16 ANTIONY ppb
Ala ALUMNUM ppb
100
160
All POTASUM ppb
ASO MADNES
100
A61 TETRANE pp b
A02 BENZENE ppb
A8 3 DIOXANE ppb
A5 4 METHDOE ppb
A66 PYRIDIII ppb
ASO TOLUENE ppb
A87 1, 11 ,1-T ppb
AS$ 1 1 2-T ppb
A8 9 THINE ppb
AID PERCENE ppb
All OPXYLE
6 6
6
600
10
600
6
6
6
6
6
A72 ACROLIN ppb
A73 ACRYILE ppb
A1 4 BISTHER ppb
A76 BROMONE ppb
Ala METHBRO ppb
All CARBIDE ppb
A76 CHLBENZ ppb
10
10
10
10
10
10
to
Al p CULTHER ppb
ASO CULFORM ppb
10
6
.3 7
Table D2-3. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1988. (sheet 2 of 12)
-------------------------------------- ----- Constituent l.isl_Weter Quality Parameter s
Constituent Data, tion Below Drinking Water Standards
Code Name UnI to limit Samples Detectlen Standard Agency Exceeded Full name
All SODIUM ppb 200 a 0 Sodium
All MANCESE ppb 6 a 2 60 EPAS Mangan ese
Alt IRON pl,b 30 a 0 300 EPAS xxx Iron
C67 PHENOL ppb IO 1 4 •.• Phenol
CIS SULFATE ppb 600 a 0 260000 - EPAS Sulfate
CIS CULORID ppb 600 e 0 260000 EPAS Chloride
H2 4 FSODIUM ppb 200 e 0 Sodium, fllt.red
1129 FMANCAN ppb
6
e
a ss•
60 EPAS Manganese filtered
1131 FIRON ppb
30
a
6
300 EPAS Iron, f1Itered
H61 LPHEUOL ppb 10 1 1 •e• Phenol, low OL
----- Constituent Llat=Site Specific and Other Perimeters -----------------
Below Drinklnp Water Standards
Semple• Detection Standard Agency Ex ce eded Full name
6 0 20000 EPA Tritium (H-3)
e e e.e Beryllium
e 0 Strantlum
a 0 6000 EPAS Zinc
a 0 Calcium
a 6 1300 EPAP Copper
a 1 Vaned lum
e a see Antimony
a e ses Aluminum
a 0 Pates alum
a 0 Ma pn alum
16 Is ass 6 EPA Mrachloromethane [Carbon Tetrachloride
N 11 so* 6 EPA Benzene
14 lA see Dloxane
16 116 sae Methyl ethyl ketone
14 14 ass Pyrldlne
l^
hA see
2000 EPAP
Toluene
16
16 ses
200 EPA
I, 1 o1-Trlchloroathane
16 I6 ass 1,1,2-Trlchloroathane
16 16 eee 6 EPA Trichloroethylese lst,2-Trlchloroetheno
16 16 sso Parehloroethy lane [Tstrechloroothenel
16 16 ses 4 40 EPAP xylem• o,P
14 1 4 see Acroleln -
IA 11 ass Acryloaltrlle
1 4 hA see Bla(chloramothyl) ether
11 1 4 eee Bromoacetone
14 14 ass Methyl bromide
N 1 4 *so Carbon d isulfide
N 14 ass 60 EPAP Chlorobenzene
1 4 IA so* 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
16 16 soe 100 EPA Chloroform (Tr lch loromethanal
O
A C)
m m
N ^
o Co
Co
i

n vM
O
N C
au
Constituent Detection
Code Name Units Limit
Ael UETHCHL ppb 10
A02 CHMTHER ppb ]0
A03 CROTONA ppb 10
A04 DIBRCUL ppb 10
A06 DIBRETH ppb
ASS DIBRILET ppb
f0
10
AST DIBUTEN ppb 10
ASO DICDIFM ppb
ASS 1,1-0 IC ppb
10
10
AS0 1 2-DIC ppb 10
A01 TAARCE ppb 10
A92 OIC HY ppb 10
ASS NETHYCH ppb
A99 DTCPANE ppb
10
to
A96 DICPEHE ppb 10
ASO NNDIEIIY ppb
ASS HYORSUL ppb
10
10
801 IODOUET ppb
802 METHACR ppb
IO
10
803 METHTHI ppb 10
809 PENTACH ppb 10
B06 1112-tc ppb 10
800 1122-tc ppb 10
800 BROMORM ppb 10
809 TRCUEOL ppb 10
810 TRCUFLM ppb 10
Oil IRCPANE ppb
812 123-trDD ppb
1013 VINYIOE ppb
019 U-XYLE
10 16 DIETIIY ppb
10
1 0
10
10
B10 ACETILE ppb 3000
C04 UETACRY ppb
CTI FORUALN ppb
CIA PHOSPHA ppb
1106 ETIIOXTO ppb
1100 EIIIUETH ppb
Ills TC
1110 fZINC ppb
30
600
1000
3000
10
1006
1115 FCALCIU ppb
H26 MICKEL ppb
H24 FCOPPER ppb
H27 FVANADI ppb
1120 FALUMIN ppb
1130 FPOTASS ppb
1132 FMAGNES ppb
1133 FSERYLL ppb
1136 FSTRONT ppb
H30 FANTIMO ppb
60
10
10
6
160
100
60
6
20
100
9 1 8 9"
1 1 0 7 - -1
Table 02-3. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1988. (sheet 3 of 12)
----- Constituent Lint-Site Specific and Other Parameters -----------------------------
Below Orinklna Water StanJarJa
Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded full name
]A It sea Methyl chloride IChloromethenel
19 19 see Ch loromethyyl methyl ether
U 11 tee CrotonaldehyJe
14 IA see 0 EPAP 12-Dibromo-3-ch l 0roprop 4 ne
19 11 ass 1 2-Dibromoethane
19 19 see Dibromoswthane
19 11 ess 1 9-Dichloro-2-butane
19 1 4 •s• 0^chlorodlfluoromethana
19 IA •s• 1,1-Dichlorosthane
19 19 see 6 EPA 1,2-Dichloroothane
14 lA see 70 EPAP trans- 1 ,2-01 chloroathene
fA 19 eee 7 EPA 1,1-Dichloroethylone
16 Is ese Mathyylane chloride
11 49 sea 0 EPAP 1,2-Dlcbloropropane
1 9 19 ass 1,3-Dichloropropens
11 11 *so 14,11-diethylhydraaine CD m
19 19 ass IlyJrogen au <
19
IA
1 1
lA
19
19
19
19
19
IA
lA
19
16
11
19
19
11
N
IA
IA
19
19
19
19
19
19
16
19
•s•
•s•
sea
ese
sea
ass
ess
*so
see
ass
sea
eee
sea
see
100
2
MO
EPA
EPA
EPAP
_
Iodomethane
Methacrylonitrlle
Uathanothlol
Pentachloroothane
1,1,1,2-Atrachlorethane
1,1,2 2-Tetrachlorethans
Bromolorm (Trlbramomethane)
Trlchloromsthanethioi
Trlchloromonofluoromothano
Trlchloropropan•
1 2,3-Tr ichloropropane
Vinyl chlorl Je
Xyy lane-m
Dlathy laralue
y
o M
= OD
F--
1-
19 14 ese Acetonitrile
U
14
6
19
19
6
ese
eee
ess
Methyl mothacrylate
Formalln
Phosphate
1 1
11
9
6
lA
19
0
0
ese
eee
6000 EPAS
Ethylene oxide
Ethyl methacrylato
Total carbon
Zinc flitared
0 0 Calcium, filtered
0
0
0
6 1300 EPAP
Nickel,
Copper,
filtered
fllterbd
a
a
2
a sea
Vanadium, filtered
Aluminum, filtered
a
0
0
0
6
0
0
a
0
8
see
see
Potassium, filtered
Magnesium, flitereJ
Beryllium, filtered
Str0ntlum, filtered
Antimony, filtered
o
O

D
v
vN
W
'.^
' 1 uq
t°
Table D2-3. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1988. (sheet 4 of 12)
________ ___________ ___ ___________ ______ Constituent Llst=Slte Specific and Other Parameters -----------------------------------
Constituent Detection Below DrinklaQ Wstar Standards
Code Name lift its Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exc ee ded Full name
1180 TURBID ntu 0.1 l 0 Turbidity
1188 BROMIDE ppb 1000 a 6 sss Bromide
1187 NITRITE ppb 1000 a a see Nitrite
IIa6 HEXONE ppb 10 16 16 ••s Haxone
ToI ACETONE ppb 10 19 9 Acetone
109 BUTAHOL ppb 6000 9 9 *so I-Butanol
I10 PROPAIIL ppb 6000 9 9 •es 2-Proyy&nol
121 TRIBUFII ppb 10 9 9 ••• Tributylphoephor le acid
128 TAf ppb 10 1 9 11 ••• Tetrahydorf uran .
I 7 ETHANOL ppb 6000 9 9 ass Ethanol
L20 a MBP , ppb 6000 9 9 as* Monobutylphosph&te
L21 DBP ppb 6000 9 9 ees Dl buty 1pho&phate -
------------------------------------------------_ Constituent List=WAC 173 - 303 - 0006 --------------------------------------------
Constituent Detection Below Drinklnpp Water an
Name Units Limit Semple& Detect) on Stendord Agency Exceeded Full name N ern
A23 THALIIAI ppb 6 6 6 so• Thal l lees -" A
A24 THIOURA ppb 200
r
9 9 sae thiourea r.
A26 ACETHEA ppb 200
9
9 see
1-Accty1-2-thlouree
A2
6 CHLOREA ppb 200
9
9 *as 1-(o-Ch loroyyhenyl) thiourea
0W
A27 DIETROL ppb 200 9 9 *so Olethylatllbeatorol
^..,
A20 ETHIflEA ppb 200 9 9 eee Ethylenethloures
A29 NAPHREA ppb 200
9
9 es• 1-Napthyyl-2-thiourea
A32 PHEHREA ppb 600
9
9 sae H-henylthlourse
A40 ODD ppb 0.1 9 9 sea DDg
M1 DDE ppb- 0.1 9 9 ees DDE
A42 DDT ppb 0.1 9 9 sss DDT
A43 HEPTLOR ppb 0.1 9 9 e•a 0 EPAP Heptachlor
A44 HEPTIOE ppb 0.1 9 9 s•• 0 EPAP lleptachfor epoxide
A ga DIELRIN ppb 0.1 9 9 a•e Die
% I d, in
A47 ALDRIN ppb 0.1 9 9 see Aldrin
A48 CHLOANE ppb 1 9 9 see 0 EPAP Chlordane
A99 Ef6)O1 ppb 0.1 9 9 sss Endosulfan I (el ha)
A62 END02 ppb 0.1 9 9 sss Endosul An II (bite)
A69 ARt01 8 ppb 1 9 9 ass 0 EPAP Arochlor 1016
A66 AR1221 ppb 1 9 9 see 0 EPAP Arochlor 1221
A66 AR1232 ppb 1 9 9 *so 0 EPAP Arochlor 1232
A67 AR1242 ppb 1 9 9 sea 0 EPAP Arochlor 1212
A6a AR1240 ppb 1 9 9 ass 0 EPAP Arochlor 1290
AS9 AR1264 ppb 1 9 9 sss 0 EPAP Arochlor 1269
ASO AR1280 ppb 1 9 9 sae 0 EPAP Arochlor 1280
820 ACETOPII ppb 10 9 / see . Acetophenons
821 WARFRIN ppb s0 9 9 see Warfarin
622 ACEFENE ppb 10 9 9 *so 2-Acetyfaminafluoren•
623 AMIt10YL ppb t0 9 9 ass 9-Am inoblphenf i
024 AMIISO% ppb 10 4 4 •ea
6-(Aminomethy)-3-isoxaaolol
i

a .9
O NI
O
Table D2-3. Cons tituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101 -M Pond, November 1988. (sheet 5 of 12)
Con stituent tlmt=WAC 173 - 303 - 9906 --------------------------------------------- -
Constituent Ootectlon
)elmn SOng We ter Standards
Code Nsme Units Limit Samples De Lectlon stands rd Agency Excetded Full name
1
1
1
•m•
tot
moo
Amitrole
Anllln•
Arsmlt•
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
1
!
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Dot
*to
0e 4
ems
mom
mom
mmm
tso
mom
eoo
sot
oos
ooe
too
tom
400
moo
met
moo
•mo
too
set
tea
moo
sot
000
ooe
oos
see
oos
tom
ooe
•o•
•o•
••o
ooe
too
0 e0
000
moo
oso
os•
mom
.
0 EPAP
Auramine
B•nz[c]mcridin•
8e ax [•]•nthrmc•n•
0enztnm, dlchloromethyl
0enzeneth101
B•nzldln•
benzo(b]fluoranthmnm
B•nzo J fluoranthene
yy 13ansoqulnon•
Benzyl chloride
01e ((2-chloroethoxr) ethane
el•(2-chloro•thyyl et her
Bls(2- •thylhsxyl) phthalate
1-Bromoheny( then I other
Butyl bans h•lst• pht
2-stc-s,6-(ONer) Butyl-dlnitrophonol
o
Chloroalkyl others
p-Chlor*aniline
p-Chloro-m-cresol
1-Chloro-2,3-•poxypropan•
2-Chlorona, hths lone
2-Chlorophenol
Cresols
2-Cyclohex 1-1 8dinitropheno 1
Diben:[[a,h •cr^din•
Olbenz [s,1 scrldln•
Olb•ns `a, anthracene
7H-Oibsn so e,p]c•rbazol•
Manz o •,• pyrene
Dibonxo s,h pyr•ne
Dlbonzo • i pyrona
Dl -n-butyl phthalate
1,2-Dlchl orobens•n•
1,3-Dlchlorobenz•ne
1,1-Dichlorobenzen•
3,3'-61 chlorob•nzidine
2,1-Oichlorophanol
2 6-Olchlorophanol
D^•Lhyl phthalsto
0 1hy1rosolrol•
s,9 -Dlm•thoxybonsldlne
y Dlmmthyleminomzobenzane
7,3'
^ CD
(D
-'3a
w r'
0 0^
= 00
I
12-OIm:thyIb•nzjajsnthracona
B26 AYITHOL ppb
020 ANILINE ppb
B27 ABAYITE ppb
10
10
10
4
1
1
020 AUBAYIN ppb
029 BEHZCAC ppb
B30 BENZAAN ppb
831 BENDICY ppb
632 BENTHOL ppb
833 BEHOINE ppb
831 BENZBFL ppb
1336 BEHZJFLppb
836 PBE14ZQU ppb
037 BENUI L ppb
1336 0T52CIlM ppb
939 a SMIE ppb
010 6 S2EPH ppb
2 I1 BBOPHEN ppb
B42 BUTBENP ppb
013 BUT0114P ppb
B11 CHALETH ppb
04 6 CULANIL ppb
818 CHLCRES ppb
817 CHLEPDX ppb
BU CIU.NAPH ppb
010 CHMEN ppb
861 CHESOLS ppb
B62 CYCHDIN ppb
063 DIBAHAC ppb
661 DIBAJAC pph
066 MAHAN ppb
066 DISCOCA ppb
867 0 BAEPY ppb
860 DIBAHPY ppb
B69 DIBAIPY ppb
Ban DIBPHTH ppb
881 12-db•n ppb
862 13-dben ppb
863 11-dben ppb
001 DICHBEH ppb
B86 21-dchp ppb
966 26-dchyy ppb
067 DIEPHTH ppb
BO6 DIHYSAF ppb
869 DIUETNB ppb
870 DIUEAUB ppb
13 11 DIUBENZ ppb
13 12 DIUEYLS ppb
als TIMM)( ppb
811 DIYPHAU ppb
10
10
10
10
10
f0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
ID
10
10
10
10
10
ID
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
to
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
IO
10
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
s
/
1
4
1
s
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
000
see
ooe ,
3,-Diem thylbenzf(d n•
Thlo/anox
alpl,.,alpha-Dimmthylphenethylamine

v
v
C7
N 1
Table D2- 3. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1988. (sheet 6 of 12)
Constituent List=WAC 171-303-9906
Constituent Detection 8e 10r DrinMlnaa We br StenJerd•
Code Name Units Limit Samples Detection Ste do rd Agency Ex ce eded Full name
076 OIW WHEN ppb
876 DIMPHTII ppb
817 DINDENZ ppb
879 DINCRES ppb
819 D114PIlEN ppb
880 2 4 -dint ppb
Bet 26-dint ppb
982 DIOPHTH ppb
88 11 DIPHAYI ppb
BBf DIPIIHYD ppb
BB6 DIPINHT ppb
088 ETHMINE ppb
897 ETIWETS ppb
888 FLUORAN ppb
089 UEXCBEN ppb
BOO NEXCBUT ppb
10
10
10
10
60
10
10
1 0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
4
t
1
!
1
1
1
A
f
f
4
f
f
f
f
f
4
f
f
4
f
f
1
4
f
f
f
1
4
4
4
4
e so
ass
as*
too
ass
ass
so*
toe
eee
so*
ass
see
see
so*
s••
111
2 4-Dlmethylphenol
Di methyl phthalate
Dlnitrobenzene
4,8-0 1 nitro-o-cresol and salts
2,1-Dlnitrophenol
2,f-Dlnitrotoluene
2 6-Dlnitrotoluene
Dl-n-octyl phthalate
Dlphenylamine
1 2-Dlphenyylh[drazlne
Dl-n-proppyl nl ro ssmine
EthylenoW ne
Ethyl methsnssulfonste
Fluoronthen,
Ibsschlorobenzsne
lleaachlorobutadlene
B91 IIEXCCYC ppb
892 HEXCETH ppb
B93 INDENOP ppb
894 ISOSOLE ppb
B96 YALOILE ppb
B98 YELPHAL ppb
891 METHAPY ppb
898 METHNYL ppb
099 YETAZIR ppb
COI YETCHAN ppb
CO2 METBISC ppb
CO3 UETAC70 ppb
COS UETMSUL ppb
COO METPROP ppb
C07 METHIOU ppb
COO NAPUQUI ppb
COO 1-naphs ppb
CIO 2-nspha ppb
C11 HI RANI ppb
C12 NITBENZ ppb
C19 NITPHEN ppb
C14 INIBUTY ppb
CIS NNIDIEA ppb
CIS NNIDIEY ppb
C17 I9II11IME ppb
CI9 INIMETH ppb
CIO 1141URET ppb
C20 INIVINY ppb
C21 I9IIMORP ppb
C22 INIHICO ppb
C23 MIPIPE ppb
C24 UIMPYR ppb
C26 141TRIOL ppb
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
]0
10
10
10
60
10
60
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1
4
f
4
4
4
d
!
A
4
1
1
f
4
4
f
1
f
f
d
4
4
4
4
9
4
4
f
1
f
!
f
4
4
4
d
4
4
4
d
f
C
4
4
4
4
1
4
1
4
4
4
d
1
4
4
4
9
1
1
4
f
4
4
!
4
see
*so
*so
so*
see
see
*so
111
esa
too
*so
so*
ete
eee
eta
*so
eee
eee
ete
111
eee
eee
so*
so*
so*
too
sos
tes
eee
so*
eta
set
040
liezechlorocyyelopentsdlene
lleaschloroeth *no
Tndsno (1 2,3-cd)pyrene
Iaoofro^s
Mslononitrlle
Yelppholsn
1leths yrllene
Moths onyl
2-Yethylszirldine
3-Methyleholonthrene
4,V-Mathylsnabis(2-chloroonlllne)
2-Ysthyllactonitrllo
Methyl methanesulfonste
2-Methyyl-2-(msthylthlo) proplonsldehyde-
Methyy^lthlouracll
1 ,4-Haphthoqulnone
1-Naphthylsmine
2-Naphthylsmine
p Nltrosnlllne
Nitrobenzene
4-Nitrophenol
N-nitrosodl-n-bgtyylamine
N-nitrosodlethanol amine
H-nitrosodlethyylsmine
H-nitroso4imethylsmine
N-nitrosomethylethylsmine
N-nitroso-o-methrrlurethone
N-nitrosomathylviny ism lne
N-nitrosomorph*line
N-nitrosonornicotine
N-nitr000piperldlne
Nltrosopyrrolldlne
6-Nitro-o-toluldine
.'O O
M m
N ^
o 03
= 03

Constituent
Code Name Unite
C26 PENTCHB ppb
C27 PENTCHN ppb
C2 8 PENTCIP ppb
C2 11 PHENTIN ppb
C30 PRENINE ppb
C31 PHIHEST ppb
toC32 PICOLIN ppb
4 1 *so 2-Picollne
M'O
'O
O
N
I
N
C33 PRONIOE ppb
C RESERPI ppb
C36RESORCI ppb
CIA SAFFOL ppb
C37 TETRCHB ppb
C30 TETRCHP ppb
C40 1 JURAII ppb
C 4 1 IOLIIDTA ppb
C 4 2 OTOLHYD cob
Cal
CIO
C17
CIA
CIO
Coo
caw
C07
Coo
Cal
Table D2-3. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1988. (sheet 7 of 12)
------------------------- Conatltuent LIst=WAC 173-303-9006 ---------------------------
Detection Below Drinking Water Standards
Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full name
10 4 e^ ass Pentachlorobentene
10 d 1 see Pentachloronitrobans
60 1 d see 220 EPAP Pentachlorophenal
10 d d see Phan scetIa
10 1 d *so Phenyl enodl amine
30 f d as* phthalic acid *star*
10 d d ue Pronamide
10 d d see Reserpino
10 1 d see Resorcinol
10 d d so* Ssfrol
10 d d see 1,2,4,6-Te
10 4 d ass 2s3,d,0-Te
10 d d eee Thlurem
10 d d see loluenedla
10 f 1 see o-loluldin
10 d d sae 1,2,4-Trlc
60 4 d see 2,d, 6- 1 rlc
10 d d see 2,45 -Trlc
to d d see O,o,o-trla
10 d d see 5ym-trinit
10 d a * as 7rle(2,3-d
to d 4 eee ansolalppy
10 d d see
C;
10 d d see Bls(2-chic 1014,
to d d *so Kaxachloropropane
3000 d d see Ilydreslne
to d d ass. Ilexechloropheno
10 d d ese lie
10 d 1 set 1,2,3-Trlchlorobe
phtheleae
10 d d *as 1,3,6-Trlchlorobe
to d 1 .ass 1,2,3.4-4trachlo
10
2
30
2
2
2
2
2
10
1000
d
d
4
4
1
d
d
4
6
4
!
d
d
d
f
A
d
d
6
f
*so
see
.o•
•ee
•se
ass
•as
*so
ese
ass
1,2,3,6-tatrachlo
Tatreeth 1 py ro ho
Ch to robnsllat*
Cerbophenothion
Oloulfoton
Dlmuthoata
Uethyl psrathlon
Parathlon
Cyanide
Perchlorate
1000
10000
60
0.1
1000
2000
60
d
1
6
d
e
4
.d
A
1
6
d
e
d
4
see
• so
see
ees
see
see
*so
Sulfide
Kerosene
Ammonlum Ion
Dioxin
Citrus red
Paraldehyde
Strychnine
orobensene
orophonol
ochloride
anion s,
hsnol
hone
hosphorothloate
ens
propyl) phosphate
ropyl) ether
to
CD
;:V O
M m
N ^
o 03
3 CO

Table D2-3. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1988. (sheet 8 of 12)
----------------- ------------------------------- Constituent List=VAC 113-303-9906 --------------------------------
Constituent Detection Below Drinklnp Water Standards
Code Name Units Limit Sampl esDetection Standard Agency Exceeded Full name
C92 MALIIYDR ppb 600 1 A s.. Malelc hydraalde
C93 NICOTIN ppb 100 1 4 u. Nlcotl n lc acid
C94 ACRYIDE ppb 10000 1 / s.. 0 EPAP Acrylamlde
COS ALLYLAL ppb 2600 1 1 s.s Allyl alcohol
C97 CHLACET ppb 16000 1 1 ese Chloroseetoldshyyde
COS CHLPROP ppb 1000 1 1 sss 3-Chloroproplonitrile
H03 ET CARD ppb 6000 1 / sss
Ethyl carbona te
1101 MCYAN ppb 200D 1 / so* Ethr/1 cyranid*
1109 ISOBUTY ppb 1000 1 1 sae ISO6ucyl alcohol
H11 PROPYLA ppb 10000 1 / *so a-Propylamin*
1112 PROPYHO ppb 8000 1 1 so* 2-Pro -1-01
' 1 11 6 2 1 6-T ppb 2 1 1 so*
2,1 6-T
H40 Fffl9LI ppb 6 6 6 sss
TWIlum, filtered
vs.. - Indi ca tes all sample are reported as below contractual detection limits
xxx - Indicates that Drinking Co Water Standards were exceeded
O
EPA - b...d on Maximum ntaminant Levels riven In 10 CFR Part 111 (JUIh,1987) tD M
National Primary Drinking Water Re
gulations as amended b 62 FR 21690 < ^
0
EPAR - based on National Interim Primary Drinking Water Rev. I. t cans, y P0
^.. Appendix IV, EPA-670/9-76-003
w EPAP - b as ed on proposed Maximum Contaminant Level Coal& In 60 FR 16936 0 00
EPAS - b as ed on Secondary Maximum Contamin an t Lev el s g iv en In 40 CFR Part 113 = Co
National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations
WDOE - based on odd, tlonal Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels given In
WAC 248-61, Public Water Supplies

a
^o
0
N
A
^3 ! 0 a `) -7
Table D2-3. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1988. (sheet 9 of 12)
Dup I Icete CONWFLD COMMAS PN-LA8 PIIFIELD TOC TOM OL
Well Collection •8@ ie UMho umho PPb PPb
nerve Dete numb•$, 1/70OW ./700W 0.01/8.68 0.1/0.6 8 1000/. 20/.
2711-1 IONOV88 686 671 7.6 6.6 400 24
1 684 686 1.6 6.8 300
2 663 666 6.0 8.6 300 3
1300
^0
3 684 683 7.6 6.6 3
2416 11 23NOVOO 833 8.6
2-916-2 10IMS 263 206 7.6 8.4 200
^7
- 1 262 271 1.8 6.4 300
1
2 282 210 1.8 8.4 300 2
3 202 211 1.6 6.4 1600
7
2-E18-2 22NOV88 267 6.0 200 1
1 280 8.1 3D0 1
2 260 8. 1 300 2
1 280 6.1 X200 8
2-E18-2 23NOV60 278 8.6
2-E18-3 10140V88 232 228 7.8 8.1 400 6
1 232 233 1.8 8.1 600 7
• 2 232 233 1.8 6.1 600
2
8 232 234 1.6 6.1 1600
0
2-918-8 28 40V88 247 8.4
2-Ell-4 08NOV88 270 242 7.8 6.2 600 4
1 271 260 7.8 8.2 800
2
2 - 211 261 6.0 8.2 600 3
3 210 260 6.0 8.2 1600
2
2-E18-4 23NOV88 262 8.4
( O
m m
o 00
= co
I
.^ .a

nv
O
N l
p -7 n y
Table D2-3. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1988. (sheet 10 of 12)
Dupl lcate ACEIIRIE At PHA ARSENIC FARSENI BARIUM FBARIUM BETA FCALCIU CALCIUM
Well Col lectlon sampple ppb pCl/L ppb ppb b
[yp
^^yy
name Date namb•r 10/. 4 /16 6/60 6/60 8/1000 6%1000 p6/60 60/. 6o/.
2-EIS-1 I 011OVea 82 3.830 (6 (6 4 2 4 3 9. 4 6 63,200 67, 4 00
lall0Vee 1 32 3.900 (6 (6 38 36 10.70 68, 4 00 61,700
IOil0Ve8 2 13
laltOVea 3 It
23110VOO (10
23ttOV88 M

Table D2-3. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1988. (sheet 11 of 12)
Dup l l cat* LEADGF YAC16S FYAGNES MANGESE NICKEL FNICNEL NITRATE FPOTASS
Well Coll4ctlon •.apyl• ppb yppb pyb ppb PPb
PPb PPb
no" 0oto nuw64r 6/60 EO /. 60/. 6/60• 10/. pp" 10/. 600/46000 100/,
2-E16-1 10110V88.

a v0NI
r
V
2-Ele-I 10110V88 112,000 21,600 a-287

av v0NI
Co
Co
Table D2-4. Constituent Lists and Summary of Sampling Results for the
2101-M Pond. February 1989. (sheet 1 of 7)
Constituent List=Contamination Indicator Parameters
Constituent Detection Below Drinklnp Water Standards
Cods Name Units Limit SamPles Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full name
088 CONDLAB umho 16 0 700 WDOESpeclfle conductance, laboratory
191 CONDFLO umho 1 18 0 100 WDOE Sppecific conductance, field
199 PHFIELD 0.1 10 0 6.6-6.6 EPAS pH, field
201 Pit-LAB 0.01 18 0 6.6-1.6 EPAS ppN laboratory
[69 TOC ppb 2000 16 0 To^.e) organic carbon
H42 TOXLDL ppb 10 le 0 Total organic halogens, low DL
------------------------------ Constituent List=Interim Primary Drinking Water Parameters ----------------------------
Constituent Detection Below Orinking Water Standards
Code Name Units Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full name
109 COLIFRM MPH 2.2 4 4 see 1 EPA Collform bacteria
111 BETA pCl/L B 6 0 60 EPA gross beta
112 ALPHAHI pCl/L 4 6 0 16 EPA Or •Ipha, high DL
181 RADIUM pCl/L 1 6 0 6 EPA Total radium
A08 BARIUM ppb 6 6 0 1000 EPA Barium
A07 CADMIUM ppb 2 6 6 *as 10 EPA Cadmium
ADS CHROMUM ppb 10 6 0 60 EPA xxx Chromium
AID SILVER ppb 10 6 6 sss 60 EPA Silver
A20 ARSENIC ppb 6 6 1 60 EPA Arsenic
A21 MERCURY ppb 0.1 6 6 ass 2 EPA Mercury
A22 SELENUM ppb 6 6 4 10 EPA Selenium
A33 ENDRIN ppb 0.1 4 4 see 0.2 EPA Endrin
A34 METHLOR ppb 3 4 4 so* 100 EPA Methoxychlor
A36 TOXAENE ppb 1 4 4 ass 6 EPA Toxaphone
A36 a-OHC ppb 0.1 4 4 ass 4 EPA Llndano, alpha-BHC
A37 b-BIIC ppb 0.1 4 4 so* 4 EPA I.None, beta-BHC
A36 -BIIC ppb 0.1 4 4 *so 4 EPA Llndane, gamma-BHC
A39 -BHC ppb 0.1 4 4 *so 4 EPA Llndane, dolts-BHC
A61 LEADGF ppb 6 6 6 sss 60 EPA Lead (graphite furna ce )
C12 NITRATE ppb 600 4 2 46000 EPA Nitrate
C14 FLUORID ppb 600 4 3 4000 EPA Fluoride
H13 2,4-D ppb 2 4 4 see 100 EPA 2,4-0 12,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid]
H14 2 4 6TP ppb 2 4 4 ees 10 EPA 2.4 6-TP silvox
H2O FAAAIUM ppb 6 6 0 1000 EPA
Barium, filtered
U21 FCADMIU ppb 2 6 4 10 EPA Cadmium, filtered
U22 FCRROMI ppb 10 6 6 see 60 EPA Chromium filtered
H23 FSILVER ppb 10 6 6 *so 60 EPA Sllvor. filtered
1137 FARSENI ppb 6 6 1 60 EPA Arsenics filtered
1136 PMERCUR ppb 0.1 6 6 ass 2 EPA Mercury, filtered
H39 FSELENI ppb 6 6 4 10 EPA Selenium filtered
H41 PLEAD ppb 6 6 6 so* 60 EPA Lead filtered
1160 TURBID ntu 0.1 1 0 1 EPA xxx Turbidity, nepholometric
z CD
m m
N ^
o Co
=S Co

D
v
v
N
i 0 7
Table D2-4. Constituent Lists and Summary of Sampling Results for the
2101-M Pond, February 1989. (sheet 2 of 7)
-------------------------------- ------ Constituent List=Oster Quality Par am eters -------------------
Constituent Detection Below Drinking Water Standards
Code Name Unite Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full name
All SODIUM ppb 200 6 0 Sodium
All MANOESE ppb 6 6 1 60 EPAS Mangan es e
A10 IRON. ppb 30 6 0 300 EPAS was Iron
CIA SULFATE ppb 600 4 0 260000 EPAS Sulfate
C16 CHLORID ppb 600 4 0 260000 EPAS Chloride
H24 FSODIUM ppb 200 6 0 Sodium, filtered
H2 9 FRANOAN ppb 6 6 6 fee 60 EPAS Manganese, filtered
HSI FIRON ppb 30 6 2 300 EPAS Iron, filtered
H61 LPHENOL ppb 10 4 4 foe Phenol, low DL
-------------------------- ------ Constituent Lie L=Site Specific and Other Constituents -------------
Constituent Detection allow Drinking mater Standards
Code Name Units Limit S am pl es Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full na me
101 TRITIUM pCi/L 600 1 0 20000 EPA Tritium (H-3)
A01 BERYLUM ppb 6 6 6 too Beryllium
A03 STRONUM ppb 21 6 0 Strontium
A04 ZINC ppb 6 6 0 6000 EPAS 'Zinc
A06 CALCIUM ppb 60 1 0 Calcium
Al2 NICKEL ppb 10 6 1 Nickel
A13 COPPER ppb 10 6 3 1300 EPAP Copper
A14 VANADUM ppb 6 6 1 Vanadium
Ali ANTIONY ppb 100 6 6 to Antimony
A10 ALUMNUM ppb 160 6 6 tee Aluminum
All POTASUM ppb 100 6 0" Potassium
A60 MAONES ppb 60 6 0 Magnesium
C76 PHOSPHA ppb 1000 4 4 too Phosphate
H10 TC ppb 1000 1 0 Total carbon
H11 FZINC ppb 6 6 0 6000 EPAS Zine! filtered
11 11 FCALCIU ppb 60 6 0 CaIc^ us, filtered
11 26 FNICKEL ppb 10 6 4 Nickel, filtered
H2O FCOPPER ppb 10 6 4 1300 EPAP Copper, filtered
H27 FVANADI ppb 6 6 0 Vanadium, filtered
HIS FALUMIN ppb 160 6 6 efe Aluminum, filtered
H30 FPOTASS ppb t00 6 0 Potessiva, filte re d
H32 FMAONES ppb 60 6 0 Magnesium, filtered
H33 FBERYLL ppb 6 6 6 w Beryllium, filtered
036 FSTRONT ppb 20 6 0 StronLium, filtered
H36 FANTIMO ppb 100 6 6 too Antimony, filtered
MOO BROMIDE ppb 1000 4 4 toe Bromide
H67 NITRITE ppb 1000 4 4 tea Nitrite
A CO
m m
^r
o cu
= m

n v
C3 NI
N CD
Table D2-4. Constituent Lists and Summary of Sampling Results for the
2101-M Pond, February 1989. (sheet 3 of 7)
-------------------------------- Constituent List=Sits Specific and Other Constituents - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .
Constituent Detection Below Drinking titer Standards
Code Name Units Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full n am e
HBO FBORON ppb 10 6 I Baron, filtered
HSI FCOBALT ppb 20 1 6 eee Cobalt, littered
HIS FLITHI ppb 10 6 6 eee Lithium, filtered
11 66 FNOLY ppb 40 6 6 see Molybdenum, I filtered
090 FSILICO ppb 60 6 0 Sllicoa filtered
Hot FT1N ppb 30 6 6 see
Tin, fi
H92 FTITAN ppb NO 6 6 eee Titanium, filtered
H93 FZIBCON ppb 60 6 6 met Zirconium, filtered
PO1 BORON ppb 10 t 1 Boron
P02 COBALT' 'ppb 20 6 6 see Cobalt
POO LITHIUM ppb 10 6 6 met Lithium
PO4 HOLY ppb 10 6 6 eee Molybdenum
P06 SILICON ppb 60 1 0 Silicon
1, 06 TIN ppb 30 6 6 eee Tim
P07 TITAN ppb s0 6 6 eee Titanium
POs ZIRCON ppb 60 6 6 eee Zirconium
Constituent List=VAC 173-103-9906 Constituents
Constituent Detection Below Drinking later Standards
Cod* Nate Units Limit S am ples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full n am e
A01
A02
A04
AS$
As?
Aso
A09
AID
All
Aso
AGO
TETRANE ppb
BENZENE ppb
METHONE ppb
TOLUENE ppb
1,1,1-T ppb
1,1,2-1 ppb
TRICENE ppb
PERCENE ppb
0PXYLE ppb
CHLFORM ppb
1,1-DIC ppb
6
6
10
6
6
6
6
6
6
i
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
see
*to
eee
*u
eee
met
eee
met
eee
eee
eee
6
6
2000
200
6
44 0
100
EPA
EPA
EPAP
EPA
EPA
EPAP
EPA
Tot rachI *rose thans [Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
Methyl ethyl ketone
Toluene
1, 11 ,1-Trichloroethans
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichicroethylene [1,1,2-Triehloro*thens
Porch loroethyIone Tetrmchloroethenel
Xrlene-o,p
Cdlorofora [Trichloromethane)
1,1-Dichloroethane
Ag o
A91
A23
81 3
1,2-DIC ppb
TRANDCE ppb
METHYCH ppb
YINYIDE ppb
6
6
6
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
eee
eee
eee
eee
6
71
2
EPA
EPAP
EPA
1,2-Dichloroethane
tuna-11,2-Dichlo ro ethens
Meth^rlene chloride [Dichloromethmns]
Vinyl chloride
B1 4
Coo
M-XYLE ppb
AMMDNIU ppb
6
60
1
1
1
1
eee
eee
110 EPAP Xylons- n
Ammonium Ion
H16
H02
Ho g
101
2,1 6-T ppb
LOYBRAZ ppb
HEXONE ppb
ACETONE ppb
2
30
10
10
t
1
I
1
1
1
1
I
eee
•ae
see
eee
2,1,6-1
Nydrasine low °'OL
Hexne Methyl loobutyl ketone]
Moons by VOA
126
1163
TAF
140DEN
ppb
ppb
10
6
1
1
1
1
eee
see 76 EPA
Tetrahydorfuran
1, 4 -Dichicrobensens [p-DichI archon tone]
toted
0
;U C)
m m
O OD
3 W
^.p
a

Table D2-4. Constituent Lists and Summary of Sampling Results for the
2101-M Pond, February 1989. (sheet 4 of 7)
ese - Indicates all samples were reported as below contractual detection limits
xxx - Indicates that Drinking Water Standards were exceeded
EPA - based on Maximum Contaminant Levels alven In 10 CFR Part 141 Ouly,1987)
National Primary Drinking Water Regulation• as amended by 62 FR 26690
EPAR - based on National Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulations,
Appendix IV, EPA-670/9-711-003
EPAP - booed on proposed Maximum Contaminant Level Goals In 60 FR 11193E
EPAS - booed on Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels given In 40 CFR Part 143
National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations
WDOE - based on additional Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels given In
WAC 240-61, Public Water Supplies
a vv 0
z o
0 m m
N
N
O 00
7 On I
.p
H

Y 'o
O
N
N
N
I . 1 3 '1 7
Table D2-4. Constituent Lists and Summary of Sampling Results for the
2101-M Pond, February 1989. (sheet 5 of 7)
Quadruplicate Contamination Indicator Parameters
Duplicate WORD
Well Collection •ample umho
name Oat• number 1/700w
2-E18-1 16FE089 637
1 639
2 632
a 631
2-E18-2' ` ' 16FE889 268
1 268
2 268
3 266
2-E18-3 18FE889 207
1 208
2 206
a 206
2-E18-9 16FE089 298
1 298
2 298
3 240
COHDLAB PH-LAB PHFIELD TOC TOXLDL
umho
./700w 0.01/8.69 0.1/8.60 2000/. 10 /.
619 7.80 7.00 200 6
612 7.60 7.00 200 6
610 7.70 6.90 200
617 7.80 6.90
1200
262 8.10 8.00 600 9
263 8.10 8.00 70o 3
266 8.10 8.00 900 6
268 8.10 8.00 /1000 3
236 8.20 8.00 800 +8
232 8.20 8.00 800 +6
229 8.20 8.00 600
12
230 8.10 8.00 1600
11
228 8.10 7.00 Boo 8
263 8.10 7.00 800 9
281 8.00 7.00 Boo
292 9.00 7.00
logo
0
Is
9
Is
O
zo
m m
w r
o CO
=CO

Regular Monitoring Data
tl dy " '
Table D2-4. Constituent Lists and Summary of Sampling Results for the
2101-M Pond, February 1989. (sheet 6 of 7)
Duplicate ALPNAIII ARSENIC FARSENI BARIUM FBARIUM BETA BORON FBORON FCADMIU
Weil [olfaction •ample PCIA ppb pPb PPb ppb pCl7L pPb PPb PPb
name Data number 4/16 6/60 6/60 6/1000 8/1000 6/60 10/. 10/. 2/10
2-EIS-1 16FEB89 4.670 (6 (6 29 31 8.86 33 38 (2
2-E18-2 IGFEB89 1.720 a a 80 69 6.46 24 18 (2
16FEBOO 1 •1.200 6 a 81 02 0 1.76 13 34 (2
2-EIO-3 ISFEB89 2.420 13 12 62 63 6.12 14 (10 2
2-EIO-4 ISFES89 0 0.879 it 10 61 62 6.66 (10 14 (2
Well
name .
Duplicate FCALCIU CALCIUM CNLORID CNROMUM COPPER FCOPPER FLUORID IRON
Collection
Date nu
:ample pPb pppb PPb ppb PPb
pp
mber 60/. 60/. 600/260000• 10/60 10/1300p 10/1300p %300•
60q/4000 30
2-EIS-1 16FE889 67,600 66,700 6,900 22 (30 (10 (600 162
M . 2-E18-2- 16FEB69 26,300 26,700 4,900 60 12 (10 700 303
18FEBOO 1 28,600 26,400 79 (10 (10 423
U 2-EIO-3 18FEB69 29,800 29,•00 6,600 104 (10 (10 (600 666
i 2-EIO-4 1 6FES69 27,400 27,800 9,600 42 13 11 (600 326
N
W
Dupl lcate FIRON MAGNES FMAGNES MANGESE NICKKpEL FNICKEL NITRATE FPOTASS
p
Well
name ColDotelen number 30/300s gSi. ESi.
3
6iEoa 10/. 10/. 600/46000 1 8Bi.
2-EI8-1 v 16FES89 (30 13,900 14,400 (6 (10 (10 11,400 6,800
2-EIS-2 1 6FE889 39 7,190 7,160 8 26 (10 (600 6,100
laFE8B9 1 40 7,220 7,610 9 40 (10 6,360
2-EIS-3 18FEBOO 41 8,320 6,270 18 64 13 (600 6,310
2-EIS-4 15FE889

Table D2-4. Constituent Lists and Summary of Sampling Results for the
2101-M Pond, February 1989. (sheet 7 of 7)
Duplicate STRONUM SULFATE TC TRITIUM TURBID F9ANADI VANADUM ZINC FZINC
well Collection sampple ppb ppb ppb pCi/L at ppb ppb pPb ppb
na g sDate number 20/. 600/260000• 1000/. 609/20000 0.1/1 6 1. 6/. 6/6000• 6/6000•
2-EIB-1 16FEBOO 210 110,000 23,800 9-66.7 1.1 0 (6 23 30
2-E18-2 I 5 FEB89 118 31,800 2 4 29 21 11
laFEBS9 1 117 21 20 22 20
2-EIS-3 ISFE089 181 12,600 31 32 22 6
2-EIS-1 15FEBBO 160 22,100 22 22 9 9
The column headers consist of : Constituent Nave
Analysis Units
Contractual Detection Limit/Drinking later Standard(suffi x )
v
-O
o
^v
Suffix
none - ba se d on Maximum Contaminant el• y Ivan In /0 CFR Part 141 (Jely,1991)
National Primary Drinking later Low Regulations se am ended b i 62 FR 26600
r - based on National Interim Priesry Drinking later Re 9ulatons,
Appendix IY, EPA-670/9-18-003
'P p - ba g d on proposed Maximum Contaminant Level Goals in 60 FR 10936
a - based on Secondary Maximum Cont am inant Levels given in 10 CFR Part 113
(July, 1997) National Secondary Drinking la ter Regulations
n - ba se d on additional Secondary M ax imum Contaminant Levels given in
1AC 218-61, Public tstar Supplies
Data flaps
( - Less than Contractual Detection Limit, reported as Limit
!
- Lams than Contractual Detection Limit, m ea sured value reported
- For radioacti ve constituents, reported value Is loss than 2-mig as error'
0
;a CD
M m
N ^
0 00
=S 00

Table D2-5. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, May 1989. (sheet 1 of 7)
--------------------------- --- --- Constituent List=Contamination Indicator Parameters --------------------------------
Constituent Detection Below Drinkinp Water Standards
Code Name Units Limit Sampl es Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full name
088 CONDLAB umho 18 0 700 yDOE Specific conductance, laboratory
191 CONDFLD umho 1 18 0 700 WDOE Specific conductance, field
199
207 PHFIELD
0.1 18 0
0.6-8.6 EPAS
pH, field
PH-LAB
0.01 18
0 6.6EPAS
-8.6
V. laboratory
C89 TOC ppb 2000 18 1 Total organic carbon
H42 TOXLDL ,ppb 10 18 0 Total organic halogens, low OL
------------------------ ------ Constituent List=Interim Primary Drinking Water Parameters ----------------------------
Constituent Detection Below DrinkinQ Water Standards
Code Name Units Limit Sampl es Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full name
n 109 COLIFRM MPN 2.2 4 4 sea 1 EPA Coliform bacteria
111 BETA pCl/L 8 6 0 60 EPA Gross beta o
112 ALPHAHI pCi/L 4 6 0 16 EPA Gross alpha, high DL m m
N 181 RADIUM pCl/L 1 6 0 6 EPA Total radium <
ro
Ln
A00 BARIUM ppb
A07 CADMIUM ppb
ADS CHROMUM ppb
a
2
10
6
6
6
0
6 as•
0
1000 EPA
10 EPA
60 EPA
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
H r-
-•
° co
AID SILVER ppb
A20 ARSENIC ppb
A21 MERCURY ppb
A22 SELENUM ppb
A33 ENDRIN ppb
A34 METHLOR ppb
A36 TOXAENE ppb
A38 a-BHC ppb
A37 b-BHC ppb
1 0
6
0.1
6
0.1
3
1
0.1
0.1
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6 see
1
6 *so
4
6 sea
6 sea
6 see
6 ass
6 eae
60 EPA
60 EPA
2 EPA
10 EPA
0.2 EPA
100 EPA
6 EPA
4 EPA
4 EPA
Silver
Arsenic
Mercury
Selenium
Endrin
Methoxychlor
Toxapheas
Lindane, alpha-BHC
Lindane, beta-BHC
o 00
a
A38 Qp- 811C ppb
A39 d-BHC ppb
A61 LEADGF ppb
C72 NITRATE ppb
C74 FLUORID ppb
H13 2,4-0 ppb
H14
H2O
0.1
0.1
6
600
600
2
6
6
6
6
6
6
6 eee
6 sea
6 aaa
1
3
6 ass
4 EPA
4 EPA
60 EPA
46000 EPA
4000 EPA
100 EPA
Undone, gya mma-BHC
Linden*, delta-BIIC
Lea d (graphite furnace)
Nitrate
Fluoride
2,4-0 ((2,4-Dichlorophonoxyacetic acid)
2,4,6TP
FBARIUM ppb 2 6 6 ppb
H21 FCADMIU ppb
H22 FCHROMI ppb
H23 FSILVER ppb
H37 FARSENI ppb
11 3a FMERCUR ppb
H39 FSELENI ppb
H41 FLEAD ppb
HBO TURBID ntu
0
2
10
10
6
0.1
6
6
0.1
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
see
0
6 ass
4
6 sss
1
6 sss
4
6 aae
0
10 EPA
1000 EPA
10 EPA
60 EPA
60 EPA
60 EPA
2 EPA
10 EPA
60 EPA
1 EPA xxx
2,4 6-IP silvex
Barium, filtered
Cadmium, filtered
Chromium filtered
Sliver, filtered
Arsenic, filtered
Mercury, filtered
Selenium filtered
Lead il^terad
Turb^dity, nopholometric

D
v 0N
N m
Table D2-5. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, May 1989. (sheet 2 of 7)
------- ------------------------- ------ Constituent List=Water Quality Parameters -------------------------
Constituent Detection Below Drinking Water Standards
Code Name Units Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full name
All SODIUM ppb 200 6 0 Sodium
All MANGESE ppb 6 6 1 60 EPAS Manganese
A19 IRON ppb 30 6 0 300 EPAS xxx Iron
C13 SULFATE ppb 600 6 0 260000 EPAS Sulfate
C76 CHLORID ppb 600 6 0 260000 EPAS Chloride
H24 FSODIUM ppb 200 6 0 Sodium, filtered
H29 FMANGAN ppb 6 6 4 60 EPAS Manganese, filtered
1131 FIRON ppb 30 6 2 300 EPAS Iron, filtered
H67 LPHENOL ppb 10 6 6 ••• Phenol. low OL
---------- ---------------------- Constituent List--Site Specific and Other Constituents -------------------
Constltwnt Detection Below Drinklnp Water Standards
Code Name Units Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Excee ded Full come
A01 BERYLUM ppb 6 6 6 ee• .. Beryllium
A03 STRONUM ppb 20 6 0 Strontium
A04 ZINC ppb 6 6 0 6000 EPAS Zinc
A06 CALCIUM ppb 60 6 0 Calcium
Al2 NICKEL ppb 10 6 0 Nickel
A13 COPPER ppb 10 6 3 1300 EPAP Copper
A14 VAHADUM ppb 6 6 0 Vanadium
A16 ANTIONY ppb 100 6 6 e•• Antimony
A18 ALUMNUM ppb 160 6 6 e•• Aluminum
A18 POTASUM ppb 100 6 0 Potassium
A60 4AGNES ppb 60 6 0 Magnesium
C78 PHOSPHA ppb 1000 6 6 •e• Phosphate
His FZINC ppb 6 6 4 6000 EPAS Zinc filtered
H19 FCALCIU ppb 60 6 0 Calcium, filtered
H26 FNICKEL ppb 10 6 3 Nickel, filtered
1120 FCOPPER ppb 10 6 4 1300 EPAP Copper, filtered
H27 FVANADI ppb 6 6 0 Vanadium, filtered
H28 FALUMIN ppb 160 6 6 •e• Aluminum, filtered
Ha g FPOTASS ppb 100 6 0 - Potassium, filtered
H32 FMAGNES ppb 60 6 0 Magnesium, filtered
H33 FBERYLL ppb 6 6 6 ••• Beryllium, filtered
H36 FSTRONT ppb 20 6 0 Strontium, filtered
H38 FANTIMO ppb 100 6 6 ••• Antimony, filtered
1168 ALKALIN ppb 20000 4 0 Total alkalinity, as cocoa
1188 BROMIDE ppb 1000 6 6 e•• Bromide
11 87 NITRITE ppb 1000 6 6 ••• Nitrite
1188 FBDflDN ppb 30 6 I Boron, filtered
1187 FCOBALT pp b 20 6 6 •e• Cobalt, filtered
0
zo
m m
r
r
O co
co
i
^.a

n vv
0
N
N
V
Table D2-5. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, May 1989. (sheet 3 of 7)
-------------------------------- Constituent List=Site Specific and Other Constituents ------------
Constituent Detection Below Drinklnp Water Standards
Code Name Units Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full name
HBO FLITHIU ppb 10 6 6 see Lithium, filtered
1189 FNOLY ppb 40 6 6 see Molybdenum filtered
H90 FSILICO ppb 60 6 0 Silicon filtered
H91 FTIN ppb 30 6 6 ass Tin,
filtered
H92 FTITAN ppb 80 6 6 *so Titanium, filtered
H93 FZIRCON ppb 6O 6 6 see Zirconium, filtered
P01 BORON ppb 10 6 0 Boron
P02 COBALT ppb 20 6 6 sss Cobalt
P03 LITHIUM ppb 10 6 6 sss Lithium
PO4 HOLY -'ppb 40 6 6 •e• Molyybdenum
POS SILICON ppb 60 6 0 Silicon
P08 TIN ppb 30 6 6 *so Tin
P07 TITAN ppb 80 6 6 *as Titanium
POS ZIRCON ppb 60 6 6 ess Zirconium
Constituent List=WAC 173-303-9906 Constituents
Constituent Detection Below Drinkin3 Water Standards
Code Name , Units Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full name
A81 TETRANE ppb 6 1 1 •se 6 EPA Totrachloromothane [Carbon Tetrachloride
A82 BENZENE ppb 6 1 1 ess 6 EPA Benzene
A64 METHONE ppb 10 1 1 ess Methyl ethyl ketone
A8S TOLUENE ppb 6 1 1 *so 2000 EPAP Toluene
A87 1,1,1-T ppb 6 1 1 see 200 EPA 1,1,1-Trlchloroethane
A88 1,1 2-T ppb 6 1 1 see 1,1,2-Trlchloroethane
A89 TRIEENE ppb 6 1 1 *as 6 EPA Trichloroethylone [1,1,2-Trlchloroethane
A70 PERCENE ppb 6 1 1 ees Perchloroathyleno [Totrachloroothene]
All OPXYLE ppb 6 1 1 *as 410 EPAP Xyy lone-o,p
AOO CHLFORM ppb 6 1 1 eee 100 EPA Chloroform [Trichloromethano]
AB9 1,1-DIC ppb 6 1 1 eee I,I-Dichloroothane
A90 1 2-DIC ppb 6 1 1 eee 6 EPA 1,2-Olchloroothane
A91 TAANDCE ppb 6 1 1 eee 70 EPAP trans- l,2-Dichloroethene
A93 METHYCH ppb 6 1 1 ese Methylens chloride [Dichloromethano]
813 VINYIDE ppb 10 1 1 •e• 2 EPA Vinyl chloride
814 M-XYLE ppb 6 1 1 •e• 440 EPAP Xylene-m
HIS 2,4,6-T ppb 2 6 6 eee 2,4,6-T
H88 HEXONE ppb 20 1 1 eee Hexon• [Methyl Lsobutyl ketone]
101 ACETONE ppb 10 1 1 ese Acetone by VOA
I28 TAF ppb 10 1 1 eee Tetrahydorfuran
L83 14DBEN ppb 6 1 1 eee 76 EPA 1,1-Dichiorobenzene Cp-Dichlorobenzone]
CD m
CD m
N r-
7 N
I
H ?

Table D2-5. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, May 1989. (sheet 4 of 7)
eea - Indicates all samples were reported as below contractual detection limits
aas - Indicates that Drinking Water Standards wore exceeded
EPA - based on Maximum Contaminant Levels given In 10 CFR Part 141 (July,1987)
National Primary Drinking Water Re ulatlons as amended by 62 FR 26690
EPAR - based on National Interim Primary gulations,
Drinking Water Re
Appendix IV, EPA-670/9-76-003
EPAP - based on proposed Maximum Contaminant Level Goals In 60 FR 46936
EPAS - based on Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels given In 40 CFR Part 113
National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations
WDOE - based on addit tonal Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels given In
WAC 246-61, Public Water Suppliss
a 0
v z O
m m
O N rn r
N o m
Co 7 W I
.p

D v
v
0N
1
N
Table D2-5. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, May 1989. (sheet 5 of 7)
Quadruplicate Contamin at ion Indicator Parameters
DuPIIcate CONDFLD CONOLAO PH-LAO PHFIELD TOC TOXLDL
Wall Collection sample umho umho PPb PPb
name Date number 1/700w . 1700w 0.01/8.6 0 0.1/8.6s 2000/. 10/.
2-E18-1 28WYS9 660 603 8.00 7.89 1600 14
1 649 474 8.00 7.89
2 649 484 8.00 7.89 X300 13
3 649 498 8.00 7.89 1800 13
2-E19-2 OIJUN89 244 247 8.10 7.46 1400 16
1 244 223 6.10 7.48 1800 14
2 243 249 9.10 7.48 1600 12
3 244 262 8.10 7.48 1400 13
2-E19-3 O1J1N89 178 183 8.10 7.39 600 11
I 178 178 8.20 7.40 600
2 178 176 9.10 7.40 400
21
3 178 201 9.20 7.41 1400
16
2-E18-4 20WY89 266 208 9.20 8.06 900 6
1 266 282 8.10 8.06 900 17
2 266 294 8.10 8.06 11000 12
3 266 293 8.10 8.06 1900 18
0
ID m
N ^
O W
^ tb
^a

a v-o
0
N 1
w
0
Well
name
2-EIS-1
2-EIS-2
2-EIS-3
2-EIS-1
Dupllcat
Collection sample
Date lumber
20MAYSO
OIJUN89
01"89
•AIJUNB9 1
28MAYSO
Well Collection
name Date
2-EIS-1 25MAYBO
2-E18-2: 01JON89
2-EIS-3 01JUN89
OIJUN89
2-EIS-4 26MAY89
Table D2-5. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, May 1989. (sheet 6 of 7)
Regular Monitoring Data
- Daplicat ALKALIN ALPHAIII ARSENIC FARSENI BARIUM FBARIUM BETA
Well Collection temple PPb pCi/L PPb PPb ppb ppb pCi/L
name Date number 20000/. 4/16 6/60 6/60 6/1000 8/1000 8/60
2-EIB-1 26MAY89 102,000 6.630 (6 (6 26 26 8.68
2-EIS-2 OIJUN89 90,600 3.010 7 6 61 68 1.70
2-EIG-3 OIJUNB9 98,800 0.931 14 11 63 66 6.81
OIJUHRS 1 1.100 13 13 63 68 - 6.36
2-EIS-4, 28MAYSS 106,000 2.330 11 12 67 67 8.08
Dupllcat FCALCIU CALCIUM CHLORID FCHROMI CBROMUM COPPER FCOPPER
Well Collection sample pPb pPb PPb Pb PPb PPb PPb
As" Data number 60/. 60/. 600/260000s 10/60 30/60 30/1300p 10/1300p
2-EIS-1 28MAY89 60,(00 68,000 7,100 (10 20 (10 (10
2-EIS-2, OIJUNB9 28,300 27,700 8,000 (10 28 16 (10
2-EIB-3 OIJUNS9 28,600 27, Boo 7,000 (10 30 (10 (10
OIJUN89 1 27,900 27,700 8,900 12 36 (10 (10
2-E18-4 26MAYSO 31,700 31,800 14,600 (10 21 18 11
Dupl lcst FPOTASS POTASUM RADIUM FSELENI SELENUM FSILICO
sample pb Ppb pCi/L ppb PPb PPb
number 100/. 100/. 1/6 6/10 6/10 60/.
6,810 6,780 0.4710 7 8 16, 400
1,790 6,160 .0.0416' (6 (6 18,300
6,060 4, 980 0.2620 (6 (6 18,100
1 6,010 6,100 0.1380 (6 (6 17,600
6,980 6,190 .0.1470 (6 (S 17,800
80RON FBORON
ppb PPb
10/. 10/.
37 34
19 23
IB (10
13 11
17 IB
FLUORID
600/4000
600
700
(600
(600
(600
IRON FIRON MAGUES FMAGNES FMANGAN MANOESE NICKEL FNICKEL NITRATE
30%3002 30/300s 60/. 60/. 6/608 6%602 30%. 10/. 600/46000
646 (30 14,800 16,100 (6 12
121 (30 7,800 7,110 (6 9
284 39 7,720 7,710 (6 7
294 31 7,790 7,600 (6 1
121 32 8,860 9,360 8 (6
13 (10 12,000
11 (10 Goo
21 12 600
22 (10 (600
12 17 1,000
SILICON SODIUM FSODIUM
60/. 200/. 200/.
16,000 27,800 28,600
19,800 18,700 17,100
17, Boo 6,710 6,980
18,100 6,930 6,890
18,300 8,790 31,400
z°o
m m
N ^
0 00
= 00
r-. A

Table D2-5. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, May 1989. (sheet 7 of 7)
Duplicate FSTRONT STRONUM SULFATE TURBID FVANADI VANADUM ZINC FZINC
Wall Collectionsample ppb ppb ppb ntu ppb ppb ppb ppb
name Dot* number 20/. 20/. 600/260000• 0.1/1 6/. 6/. 6/6000 0 6/6000s
2-E18-1- 28MAYSS 268 267 161,000 18.6 2 1 8 30^ 12
28MAYSO 1 4 19,2
2-E18-2 OIJUN89 117 161 11,000 0.9 26 27 10 (6
2-E18-3 OIJUN89 118 118 12,600 3.0 36 31 22 (6
OIJUN89 1 113 119 12,800 31 29 9 (6
2-E18-1 .2811AY89 171 173 36,100 1.4 26 27 a (6
The column headers consist of Constituent Name
Analy a is Units
Contractual Detection Limit/Drinking Water Standard(suffix)
Suffix
v
.o none - based on Maximum Contaminant Levels given In 40 CFR Part 111 (July,1987)
National Primary Drinking Water Regulations as amended by 62 FR 26890
o
:v
r - based on National Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulations,
Appendix IV, EPA-670/9-78-003
w p - b as ed onyroposed Maximum Contaminant Level Coals In 60 FR 18938
'-' a - based on Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels given In 10 CFR Part 113
(July, 1987) National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations
r - based on additional Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels given in
WAC 218-61, Public Water Supplies
Data flags
- Less than Contractual Detection Limit, reported as Limit
- Less than Contractual Detection Limit, measured value reported
• - For radioactive constituents, reported value Is less than 2-sigma error
^°o
M m
N ^
o cv
3 CO
I

Constituent
Code Name Units
068 CONDLAB umho
191 CONOFLD umho
199 PHFIELD
207 PH-LAB
C69 Inc ppb
H42 TOXLDL ppb
Constituent
Code Name Units
a
M
0
N
109 CGLIFRM HPN
111 BETA pCl/L
112 ALPHAHI pCl/L
161 RADIUM pCl/L
A08 BARIUM ppb
A07 CADMIUM ppb
ro A08 CHROMUM ppb
AID SILVER ppb
A20 ARSENIC ppb
A22 MERCURY ppb
A22 SELENUM ppb
A33 ENDRIN ppb
A34 METHLOR ppb
ASS TOXAENE ppb
A38 a-BHC
A37 b-BHC
A38 pp-B11C
A39 d-BHC
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
-
A61 LEADGF ppb
C72 NITRATE ppb
04 FLUORID ppb
H13 2,4-D ppb
H14 2 4 6TP
FhAIUM ppb
H2O ppb
H21 FCADMIU ppb
H22 FCHROMI ppb
H23 FSILVER ppb
H37 FARSENI ppb
H38 FMERCUR ppb
H39 FSELENI ppb
H41 FLEAD ppb
HBO TURBID ntu
P19 COLIMF IOOmL
Table 02-6. Constituent Lists and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, August 1989. (sheet 1 of 7)
---------- -- Constituent List=Contamination Indicator Parameters ---------------------------------
Detection Below Dr ink ln® Water Standards
Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full name
16 0 700 WDOE Specific conductance, laboratory
1 18 0 700 NDOE Sppecific conductance, field
0.1 16 - 0 8.6 EPAS pH, field
0.01 16 0 8.6 EPAS P11, laboratory
2060 18 0 Total organic carbon
10 16 0 Total organic halogens, low DL
--------- Constituent List=Interlm Primary Drinking Water Parameters -----------------------------
Detection Below Drinkinp Water Standards
Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full name
2.2 3 3 so* 1 EPA Collform bacteria
8 6 0 60 EPA Gross beta
4 6 0 16 EPA Gross alpha, high DL
1 6 0 6 EPA Radlum, total
8 6 0 1000 EPA Barium
2 6 6 sea 10 EPA Cadmium
10 6 0 60 EPA xxx Chromium
30 6 6 •se 60 EPA Silver
6 6 1 60 EPA Arsenic
0.1 6 6 sse 2 EPA Mercury
6 6 4 10 EPA Selenium
0.1 4 4 sse 0.2 EPA Endrin
3 4 4 as* 100 EPA Msthoxychlor
1 4 4 ess 6 EPA Toxaphene
0.1 4 4 sss 4 EPA Lindane, alpha-BHC
0.1 4 4 see 4 EPA Lindane, beta-BHC
0.1 4 4 *so 4 EPA Lindane, gamma-BHC
0.1 4 4 sss 4 EPA Lindane, delta-BHC
6 6 6 *so 60 EPA Lead (graphite furnace)
600 6 2 46000 EPA Nitrate
600 6 3 4000 EPA Fluorkde
2 4 4 se ► 100 EPA 2,4-D 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid)
2 4 4 so* 10 EPA 2,4 6- P $I vex
8 6 0 1000 EPA Barium, filtered
2 6 6 *so 10 EPA Cadmium, filtered
10 6 6 see 60 EPA , Chromium filtered
10 6 6 ess 60 EPA Silver, filtered
6 6 1 60 EPA Arsenic, filtered
0.1 6 6 see 2 EPA Mercury, filtered
6 6 4 10 EPA Selenium filtered
6 6 6 see 60 EPA
Lead filtered
0.1 4 0 1 EPA xxx Turbidity, neEhelometric
1 1 0 1 EPA Collform (Membrane Filter)
0
M m
w r
0 0
= Cn
—a

a vv
0N i
w w
Table D2-6. Constituent Lists and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, August 1989. (sheet 2 of 7)
Quadruplicate Contamination Indi ca tor Parameters
Duplicate CONDFLD CONOLA 13 PH-LAB PHFIELD
Well Collection Sample umho umho
name Date number 1/700w ./700w 0.01/8.64 0.1/8.68
2-E18-1 OBAUG89 684 633 8.00 7.89
1 681 632 8.00 1.89
2 688 634 8.00 7.88
3 687 636 8.00 7.88
2-EIS-2 IIAUG89 288 286 7.90 8.01
1 286 204 8.00 8.00
2 286 288 8.00 8.00
3 288 286 6.00 8.00
2-E18-3 08AUG89 168 232 8.10 8.20
1 168 233 8.10 8.20
2 168 232 8.10 8.20
3 167 234 0.20 8.20
2-EIS-4 OBAUG89 171 263 8.00 8.09
1 171 264 8.10 8.08
2 171 264 8.00 8.08
3 171 261 8.10 8.09
WeiI
name
2-EIS-1i
2-E18-21
2-E18-3 3
2-EIB-4
Wall
name
2-E18-1
2-EIS-2
2-EIS-3
2-E18-4
Duplicate ALKALIN
Collection sample ppb
Data number 20000/.
OSAUG89 108,000
11AUG89 90,000
OBAU4089 98,000
08AUG89 106,000
OSAUG89 1
Duplicate BORON
Collection n am I• ppb
Data number 10/.
OBAUG89 38
11AUG89 19
OBAUG89 13
08AUG89 16
OBAUG89 1 16
Regular Monitoring Data
ALPHAHI ARSENIC FARSENI BARIUM FBARIUM
ppb ppb ppb
p16
pb
4/15 6/60 6/1000 8/1000
6.630 (6

X 1I
;
,9.?
Table D2-6. Constituent Lists and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, August 1989. (sheet 3 of 7)
------- Constituent List=Site Specific and Other Constituents ----------
Constituent Detection Below Drinkin WitterStandards
Code Name Units Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full name
H69 FMOLY ppb
H90 FSILICO ppb
1191 FTIN ppb
1192 FTITAN ppb
H93 FZIRCOH ppb
POI BORON ppb
P02 COBALT ppb
P03 LITHIUM ppb
PO4 HOLY ppb
POE; SILICON ppb
POO TIN — 'ppb
P07 TITAN ppb
Poe ZIRCON ppb
40
60
30
80
60
10
20
10
40
60
30
60
60
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6 see
0
6 see
6 ass
5 ese
0
6 sea
6 *as
6 see
0
6 see
6 see
6 *so
.•
Molybdenum filtered
Silicon filtered
Tin, filtered
Titanium, filtered
Zirconium, filtered
Boron
Cobalt
Lithium
Molyybdenum
Silicon
Tin
Titanium
Zirconium
-o
r`3
--------------------------- Constituent List=WAC 173-303-9906 Constituents ------------------------------------
Constituent Detection Below Drinking Water Standards m \
Code Name Units Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full name
Ito r
Wp A81 TETRANE ppb 5 1 1 ses 6 EPA Tetrachloromethane [Carbon Tetrachloride
o
A82 BENZENE ppb 6 1 1 ass 6 EPA Benzene
A64 METHONE ppb 10 1 1 see Methyl ethyl ketone
A88 TOLUENE ppb 6 1 1 *so 2000 EPAP Toluene
A67 1,1,1-T ppb 5 1 1 ass 200 EPA 1,1,1-Trichloroothans `J
A68 1 1 2-T ppb 6 1 1 ees 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
A59 7AIIENE ppb 6 1 1 see 6 EPA Trlchloroethylene 1,1,2-Trichloroethene
A70 PERCENE ppb 6 1 1 so* Perchloroothylens [Tetrtchloroethene]
AllOPXYLE ppb 6 1 1 see 440 EPAP Xyylane-*,p
Ago CNLFORM ppb 6 1 1 see 100 EPA CAloroform [Trichlorossethans]
ASO 1,1-DIC ppb 6 1 1 ses 1,1-Dlchloroethans
A90 1,2-DIC ppb 6 1 1 sea i EPA 1,2-Dichloroethans
A91 TRANDCE ppb 6 1 1 so* 70 EPAP trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
A93 METHYCH ppb 6 1 1 ses Methylene chloride [Olchloromethene]
013 VINYIDE ppb 10 1 1 ese 2 EPA Vinyl chloride
B14 M-XYLE ppb 6 1 1 ses 440 EPAP Xylene-m
COO AMMONIU ppb 60 1 1 *so A monlym Ion
NIS 2,4 6-T ppb 2 4 4 ees 2,4,6-T
H82 LHYdRAZ ppb 30 1 1 ass Hydrazine, low DL
Has HEXONE ppb 10 1 1 eee Haxone [Methyl isobutyl ketone]
101 ACETONE ppb 10 1 1 so* A. ton* by VOA
I211 TAP ppb 10 1 1 ass Tetrahydrofuran
L83 14DOEN ppb 6 1 1 so* 76 EPA 1,4-D lchlorobenzene [p-Dichlorobsnzeno]
- Indicates all samples were reported as below contractual detection limits
xxx - Indicates that Drinking water star arch- were exceedttl
EPA - based on Maxima Contaminant Levels in 40 CFR Part 141, Rational Primary Drinking Mater Regulations
EPAR - based on Rational interim Primary Drinking Rater 8egutatimus, Appendix IV, EPA-570/9-76-003
EPAP - based on proposed Maxima Contaminant Levet Goals in 50 fR 46936
EPAS - based on Secondary Maxi" Contaminant Levels in 40 CFR Part 143, National Secondary Drinking tester Regulations
DOE - based on Derived Concentration Guides in draft DOE ardor 5400.xx

Table D2-6. Constituent Lists and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, August 1989. (sheet 4 of 7)
Constituent List=Water quality Parameters
Constituent Detection Below Drinking Water Standards
Code Name Units Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full name
All SODIUM ppb 200 6 0 Sodium
All MANGESE ppb 6 6 1 60 EPAS Manganese
A18 IRON ppb 30 6 0 300 EPAS ,xxx Iron
C73 SULFATE ppb 600 6 0 260000 EPAS Sulfate
C76 Ci1LORID ppb 600 6 0 260000 EPAS Chloride
H24 FSODIUM ppb 200 6 0 Sodium, filtered
U28 FMANGAN ppb 6 6 4 60 EPAS Manganese, filtered
1-131 FIRON ppb 30 6 3 EPAS Iron, filtered
HSI LPHENOL ppb 10 4 ! *so Phenol, low DL
-------------------------- ------ Constituent Llat=Site Specific and Other Constituents ------------------------------
v
IV
Constituent
Code Name Units
Detection
Limit Samples
Below
Detection
Drinking Water Standards
Standard Agency Exceeded Full name
o
;ao
G) m
CD
ro
to
108 TRITIUM pCl/L
A01 BERYLUM ppb
A03 STRONUM ppb
A04 ZINC ppb
A06 CAL I M ppb
Al2 NICKEL ppb
A13 COPPER ppb
A14 VAUADUM ppb
A16 ANTIONY ppb
A18 ALUMNUM ppb
A18 POTASUM ppb
A60 MAGNES ppb
C78 PHOSPHA ppb
H18 TC ppb
H10 FZINC ppb
H18 FCALCIU ppb
H26 FNICKEL ppb
H28 FCOPPER ppb
H27 FVANADI ppb
N28 FALUMIN ppb
Hso FPOTASS ppb
H32 FMAGNES ppb
N33 FBERYLL ppb
H36 FSTRONT ppb
H36 FANTIMO ppb
H68 ALKALIN ppb
H88 BROMIDE ppb
H67 NITRITE ppb
N88 FBORON ppb
H87 FCOBALT ppb
H88 FLITHIU ppb
600
6
30
6
60
10
10
6
100
160
100
60
3000
1000
6
.60
10
10
6
160
100
60
6
10
100
20000
1000
1000
10
20
10
4
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
1
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
4
6
6
6
6
6
D
6 *so
0
0
0
0
6 see
0
6 •ss
6 •ss
0
0
6 sss
0
0
0
4
4
0
6 sss
0
0
4
0
6 so*
0
6 •s•
6 sss
0
6 •ss
6 sss
-
20000 EPA
6800 EPAS
1300 EPAP
.
6000 EPAS
1300 EPAP
Tritium (H-3)
Beryllium
Strontium
Zinc
Calcium
Nickel
Copper
Vanadium
Antimony
Aluminum
Potassium
Magnesium
Phosphate
Total carbon
Zinc t filtered
Calcium, filtered
Nickel, filtered
Copper, filtered
Vanadium, filtered
Aluminum, filtered
Potassium, filtered
Magnesium, filtered
Beryllium, filtered
Strontium, filtered
Antimony, filtered
Total alkalinity, as CaCO3 (Method 8)
Bromide
Nitrite
Boron, filtered
Cobalt, filtered
Lithlum, filtered
u,
0 m
C U
,.., I

1) 1 1
1 fl
1
0 7 1
Table D2-6. Constituent Lists and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, August 1989. (sheet 5 of 7)
Duplicate HOPPER FLUORID IRON FIRON MAGNES FMAGNES FMANGAN MANGESE .
Well Collection sampple ppb ppb ppb ppb ppb ppb ppb ppb
name Date numbor 10/1300p 500/4000 30/300. 30/.* 60/. 60/. 6/60s 6/603
2-EIS-1 08AUG89

n v0NIwV
9 1 1 •: f ' ) 7" 2
Table D2-6. Constituent Lists and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, August 1989. (sheet 6 of 7)
Constituent
Code, Name. Units (b)n df tc
Standard
Average rage Deviation Critical Mean
Conductivity, field
pmho/cm 4 3 11.984 528.4 39.1 1,052.9
pH, field 4 3 15.145 7.804 0.657 [3.316,18.9231
Total Organic Carbon,
ppb 4 3 11.984 387.6 156.2 2,480.5
Total Organic
Halogens, ppb 4 3 11.984 3.59 0.99 16.8
(a) Background data collected between August 1988 and June 1989.
(b) The following abbreviations are used in this table:
df . Degrees of freedom (n-1).
n - Number of background replicate averages.
ppb = Parts per billion.
tc - Bonferroni critical t-value for appropriate df and 16 comparisons
(4 parameters * 4 wells).
{mho/cm - Micromho per centimeter
^o
m m
,n r
0 00
^00

av
vN
co
co
Table D2-6. Constituent Lists and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, August 1989. (sheet 7 of 7)
Constituent Well Sample Replicate Standard Coefficient
Code Name Unite Name Date Reps Average Dev iation Yin l mum Maximum of Variation
088 CONDLAB umho 2-EIB-1 08AUG89 4 634 1.3 632 636 0.2
2-EIS-2 IIAUG99 4 286 2.1 284 208 0.7
2-EIG-3 08AUG09 4 233 1.0 232 234 0.4
2-EIB-4 08AUG89 4 263 1.4 261 264 0.6
191 CONOFLD umho 2-E18-1 08AUG89 4 667 1.7 684 688 0.3
2-E18-2 11AUGOO 4 288 1.4 286 208 0.6
2-EIS-3 OBAUG89 4 166 0.6 168 167 0.3
2-EIS-4 08AUG89 4 171 0.0 171 171 0.0
199 PHFIELD 2-EIB-1 08AUG89 4 7.89 0.01 7.88 7.89 0.1
2-EIS-2 11AUG89 4 9.00 0.01 8.00 8.01 0.1
2-E19-3 OIAUG89 4 9.20 0.00 8.20 9.20 0.0
2-EIS-4 08AUG89 4 9.09 0.01 9.08 9.09 0.1
207 PH-LAB 2-EIB-1 08AUG89 4 8.00 0.00 8.0 6.0 0.0
2-EIB-2 IIAUGB9 4 7.98 0.06 7.9 8.0 0.6
2-EIS-3 OBAUG89 4 8.13 0.06 8.1 8.2 0.8
2-EIS-4 OBAUG89 4 8.06 0.06 8.0 8.1 0.7
C89 TOC ppb 2-EIB-1 08AUG89 4 326 60.1 300 400 16.4
2-EIG-2 IIAUG89 4 676 222.0 300 800 38.6
2-EIB-3 0 BAUG89 4 600 91.8 600 700 13.0
2-EIS-4 08AUG69 4 460 67.7 400 600 12.6
H42 , TOXLDL ppb 2-EIB-1 0 SAU489 4 3.26 0.96 2 4 29.6
2-E18-2 IIAUGO9 4 10.60 3.88 6 13 36.9
- 2-EIG-3 0BAUG89 4 _ 8.60 2.39 3 9 36.6
2-EIS-4 OBAUGS9 4
9.76 4.11 6 14 47.0
0
m m
N ^
o m 00
i

Table D2-7. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1989. (sheet 1 of 16)
Constituent List= Contamination Indi ca tor Parameters
Constituent Detection Below Drinklny Water Standards
Code Name Units Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full Name
088 CONDLAB UMHO 12 0 700 ?Be YDOE Conductivity, Laboratory
181 CONDFLD UMHO " 1 17 0
WDOE Sppecific conductance
188 PHFIELD 100 17 0 6.6-8.6 EPAS pN, Field Measurement
207 PH-LAB .0100 12 a 6.6-8.6 EPA$ pH. Laboratory Mea surement
Co g TOC FPO 2000 17 17 see Total orgsnic carbon
H42 TOXLDL FPO 10 17 30 Totai Organic Halogen, Low Dot. Level
---------- -- Constituent List= Interim Primary Drinking Water Parameters -----------------------------------
Constituent Detection Below Drinking Water Standards
Coda Name Units Limit Sampl es Detection Standard_ Agency Exceeded Full Name
108 COLIFRM MPN 2.20 1 1 ees 1 EPA Collform bacteria
111 BETA PCI/L 8 6 0 60 EPA Gross bets
v 112 ALPHAHI PCI/L 4 6 0 16 EPA Alpha, High Detection Level z CD
181 RADIUM PCI/L 1 6 2 6 EPA Radium m M
o A06 BARIUM FPS
ro
0 6 0 1000 EPA Barium
A07 CADMIUM FPS 2 6 6 sea 10 EPA Cadmium 3+ r-
AO8 CHROMUM FPS 10 6 0 60 EPA xxx Chromium J0 Co
A10 SILVER FPS ]0 6 6 see 60 EPA Silver 00
A20 ARSENIC PPB 6 6 1 60 EPA Arsenic
A21 MERCURY FPS .lea 6 6 •s• 2 EPA Mercury .^
A22 SELENUM FPS 6 6 4 18 EPA Selenlum
A33 ENDRIN PPB .100 6 6 see .200 EPA Endrin
A34 METHLOR FPS 3 6 6 sea 100 EPA Mothoxychlor
A36 TOXAENE PPB FPO
1 6 6 see 6 EPA Toxsphene
A38 a-BHC
.100 6 6 sss 4 EPA Alpha-BHC
A37 b-BHC FPS .lea 6 6 ees 4 EPA Beta-BHC
A38 pp-BHC FPS .100 6 6 ees 4 EPA Gamma-BHC
A38 d-BHC FPS .100 6 6 sae 4 EPA Delta-BHC
A61 LEADGF FPS 6 6 6 sss 60 EPA Lead (graphite furnace)
C72 NITRATE FPS 600 4 1 46000 EPA Nitrate
C14 FLUORID FPS 600 4 3 4000 EPA Fluoride
H13 2,4-D ' PPB 2 6 6 *as 100 EPA 2,4-0
H14 2 4, SIP
FAARIUM FPS 2 6 6 ass 10 EPA 2 0 4 6-TP sllvex
H2O FPS 0 6 0 1000 EPA Barium, filtered
H21 FCADMIU FPS 2 6 6 sss 10 EPA Cadmium, filtered
H22 FCHROMI FPS 10 6 6 see 66 EPA Chromium filtered
H23 FSILVER FPS 10 6 6 see 60 EPA Silver, Filtered
H37 FARSENI FPS 6 6 2 69 EPA Arsenic, filtered

p vv0Nia0
Constituent
Code Name Units
H38 FMERCUR PPB
U30 FSELENI PPB
1111 FLEAD PPB
1100 TURBID NTU
P10 COLIMF PPB
Constituent
Code Name Unite
All SODIUM PPB
A17 MANOESE PPB
A10 IRON PPB
C67 PHENOL PPB
C73 SULFATE PPB
C76 CHLORID PPB
H24 FSODIUM PPB
H2O FMANOAN PPB
H31 FIRON PPB
Constituent
Code Name Units
810 CO-00 PCI/L
024 CS-137 PCI/L
831 RU-106 PCI/L
100 PU30-40 PCI/L
102 PU-238 PCI/L
104 U PCI/L
106 AM-241 PCI/L
168 TRITIUM PCI/L
121 SR 00 PCI/L
A01 BERYLUM PPB
A03 STRONUM PPB
A04 ZINC PPB
A06 CALCIUM PPB
Al2 NICKEL PPB
A13 COPPER PPB
A14 VANADUM PPB
A16 ANTIONY PPB
A18 ALUMNUM PPB
d i _ 7
Table D2-7. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1989. (sheet 2 of 16)
^- Constituent List= Interim Primary Drinking Water Parameters --------------------
Detection Below Drinklny taster Standards
Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full Name
.100
6
6
.100
1
6
6
6
4
2
6 see
4
6 eee
0
2 ses
2 EPA
10 EPA
60 EPA
1 EPA
1 EPA
xxx
Mercury, filtered
Selenium filtered
Lead fil te red
Turbidity
Con form (Membrane Filter)
---------- Constituent List= Water Quality Parameters ---- ------------------------ Detection Below Drinkinp Water Standards
Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full Name
200 6 0 Sodium
6 6 2 60 EPAS Ma nganese
36 6 0 300 EPAS xxx Iron
10 6 6 •ee Phenol
600 4 0 260000 EPAS Sulfate
600 4 0 260000 EPAS Chloride
200 6 0 Sodium, fil te red
6 6 6 so * 60 SPAS Manganese, fil te red
30 6 4 300 EPAS Iron, filtered
--- Constituent List: Site Specific and Other Constituents ----------------------
Detection Below Drinking Wate r Standards
Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full Name
22.6
20
172.6
17
17
.600
.100
600
6
6
10
6
60
10
106
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 sea
1 eee
1 eee
1 sea
1 eee
0
0
1 see
1 see
eee
eee
100 EPAR
200 EPAR
30 EPAR
1.20 DOE
1.80 DOE
600 DOE
30 DOE
20000 EPA
0 EPA
6000 EPAS
1380 EPAP
Cobalt-80
Ceslum-137
Ruthenium-108
Plutonium-230/40
Plutonium-230
Uranium
Americium-241
Tritium
Strontium-00
Beryllium
Strontium
Zinc
Calcium
Nickel
Copper
Vanadium
100
160
eee Antimony
Aluminum
^°o
CD m
^ ar-
o m
= CO
a

a
v
0 N
A
'• 1 6 4 1 ) 9 " 6
Table D2-7. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1989. (sheet 3 of 16)
-------- - ----- Constituent List= Site Specific and Other Constituents ------------------
- Constituent Detection Below Drinking Water Standards
Code Name Units Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full Name
A18 POTASUM PPB 180 6 0 Potassium
ASO NAONES_ WB 60 6 0 magnesium
C78 PHOSPHA PPB 1008 4 4 see Phosphate
HIB TC PPB 1880 6 8 Total carbon
H17 IDS 6000 1 0 600000 EPAS Total dissolved solids
His FZINC PPB 6 6 4 6000 EPAS Zinc flit* ad
H19 FCALCIU PPB 68 6 0 Calcium, filtered
H26 FNICKEL PPB 10 6 6 see Nickel, filtered
020 KOPPER PPB Is 6 6 see 1300 EPAP Copper, filtered
H27 FVANADI PPB 6 6 0 Vanadium, filtered
H2O FALUMIN PPB 160 6 6 sea Aluminum, filtered
H38 FPDTASS PPS 100 6 0 Potassium, filtered
H32 FMAONES PPB Be 6 0 Magnesium, filtered
H33 FBERYLL PPB 6 6 6 eee Beryilium, filtered
H36 FSTRONT PPB 10 6 0 Strontium, filtered
H38 FANTIMO PPB 100 6 6 see Antimony, filtered
H68 ALKALIN 20000 6 0 Alkallni ty
H88 BROMIDE PPB 1000 4 4 see Bromide
H87 NITRITE PPB 1000 4 4 ass Nitrite
HBO FBORON PPB 10 6 0 Boron, filtered
H07 FCOBALT PPB 26 6 6 see Cobalt, filtered
HBO FLITHIU PPS 10 6 6 eee Llthlum, filtered
H89
H90 FMOLY
FSILICO PPB
40 6
6
PPB
60 6 0 see Molybdenum, iltered
Sillcon filtered
H9 FTIN PPB 30 6 6 eee Tin, fi^tared 1
H92 FTITAN PPB 80 6 6 see Titanlum, filtered
H93 FZIRCON PPB 60 6 6 see Zirconium, filtered
P01 BORON PPB 10 6 0 Boron
P02 COBALT PPB 20 6 6 eee Cobalt
P03 LITHIUM PPB 18 6 6 see Lithium
PO4 HOLY FPO 46 6 6 eee Molybdenum
P06 SILICON PPB 60 6 0 Sill con
POO TIN PPB 30 6 6 see Tin
P07 TITAN PPB 80 6 6 eee Titanium
P08 ZIRCON FPS 60 6 6 see Zirconium
P12 ENDSFAN PPB .600 6 6 eee Endosulfan
P13 PHORATE PPB 2 6 6 see PHORATE
0
(Do
^ r
o m
= co

a vv
v
N
1
A
N
Table D2-7. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1989. (sheet 4 of 16)
Constituent List= WAC 173-363-8006 Constituents
Constituent Detection Below Drinkingg Water Standards
Code Name Units Limit Samples Detection Stendord Agency Exceeded Full Name
A23 THALIUM PP8 6 6 6 se• Thallium
A24 IHIOURA PPB 206 6 6 sss Thiourea
A26 ACETREA PP8 200 6 6 sss 1-acct I-2-thiourea
A26 CHLOREA PPB 200 6 6 see 1-(o-chloropphenyl) thiourea
A27 DIETROL PPB 200 6 6 •se Dlethylatllb*sterol
A26 ETHYREA PPB 200 6 6 *so Ethylenethloures
A28 NAPHREA PP8 200 6 6 see . 1-naphthyl-2-thloures
A32 PHENBEA PPB 600 6 6 see N-phenylthlourea
A40 DDD PPB .100 6 6 sss
A41 ODE PPA .100 6 6 see DOE
A42 DDT PPB .100 6 6 see DDT
A43 HEPTLOR PPB .100 6 6 see 0 EPAP Heptachlor
A44 HEPTIDE PPB .180 6 6 as* 0 EPAP Heptchlor spoxide
A46 KEPONE PPB 1 6 6 sss Kepone
A46 DIELRIN PPB .100 6 6 see Dleldrin
A47 ALDRIN PPS .100 6 6 sss Aldrin
A48 CHLOANE PPB 1 6 6 see 0 EPAP Chlordane
A48 END01 PPB .100 6 6 see Endosulfan I
A62 END02 PPB .100 6 6 see Endosulfan II
A64 AR1016 PP8 1 6 6 so* 0 EPAP Arochlor 1010
A66 AR1221 PPB 1 6 6 sse 8 EPAP Arochlor 1221
ASO AR1232 PPS 1 6 6 see 0 EPAP Arochlor 1232
A67 AR1242 PP8 1 6 6 sss 0 EPAP Arochlor 1242
ASS AR1248 PPS 1 6 6 *so 0 EPAP Arochlor 1248
A68 AR1264 PPB 1 6 6 *as 0 EPAP Arochlor 1264
A00 AR1280 PPB 1 6 6 see 0 EPAP Arochlor 1280
A01 TETRANE PP8 6 6 6 *so 6 EPA Carbon Tetrachloride by GC/MS
A82 BENZENE PPB 6 6 6 *so 6 EPA Benzene
A83 DIOXANE PPB 600 6 6 es0 Dloxone
A64 METHOHE PPB 10 6 6 *so Methyl ethyl ketone
A66 PYRIDIN PPB 600 6 6 so* Pyridine
A88 TOLUENE PPB 6 6 6 see 2000 EPAP Toluene
A87 1,1,1-T PP8 6 6 6 too 200 EPA 1.1,1-trlchloroethana
ASO 1 1 2-T PPB
6 6 6 see 1,1,2-trichloroethena
A68 7AIEENE PPB
6 6 6 see 6 EPA Trlchioroethylene
A70 PERCENE PPB 6 6 6 aee TAtrachloroethylene
All DPXYLE PPB 6 6 6 see 440 EPAP Xylene-o,p
A72 ACROLIN PPB 10 6 6 sse Acroleln
A73 ACRYILE PPB 10 6 6 *so Acrylonitrile
A74 BIS7HER PP8 5 6 6 sea Ble(chloromethyl) ether
DDS
zo°
m rn
• A
rn r
o m
= 001

Dv
v 0N
w
Constituent
Code Name Units
A75 BROMONE PPS
A78 METHBRO-PPS
All CARBIDE PPS
All CHLBENI PPB
A79CHLTHER PPB
ASO CHLFORY PPB
A81 UETHCHL PPB
A82 CHMTHER PPB
A83 CROTONA PPB
A8 4 DIBRCHL PPB
ASS DIBRETH PPB
A06 DIBRMET PPB
A87 DIBUTEN PPB
ASS DICDIFM PPB
ASO 1,1-DIC PP8
ASO 1 2-DIC PPB
Ag l TAANDCE PPB
A82 DICETHY PPB
A93 METHYCH PPB
A94 DICPANE PPS
ASS DICPENE PPB
A88 NNDIEHY PPB
A97 1,1-DIM PPB
A98 1 2-DIM PPB
801 IGDOMET PPB
802 METHACR PPB
603 METHTHI PPB
604 PENTACH FPS
606 1112-tc PPB
808 1122-tc PPB
800 BROMORM PPB
809 TRCMEOL PPB
B10 TRCMFLM PPS
B12 123-trp FPS
B13 VINYIDE PPB
814 M-XYLE PPB
Bi g ACETILE PPB
820 ACETOPH PPB
B21 WARFRIN PPB
822 ACEFENE PPB
823 AMINDYL PPS
B24 AMIISOX PPB
626 AMITROL PPB
828 ANILINE PPB
-) 1 0 f 1,:
7 I
Table D2-7. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1989. (sheet 5 of 16)
---- Constituent List= WAC 173-303-0906 Constituents
Detection Below Drinking Water Standards
Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full Name
6 6 6 so* Bramoacstono
10 6 6 sss Methyl bromide
10 6 6 as* Carbon disulfide
6 6 6 so* 00 EPAP CAlorobensene
6 6 6 *so 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether
6 6 4 100 EPA Chloroform
10 6 6 see Methyl chloride
10 6 6 see Chloromethyyl methyl ether
10 6 6 sea
Crotonaldehyde
10 6 6 sea
0 EPAP 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane
10 6 6 so* 1 2-dibromoethene
10 6 6 sss Dlbromomethane
10 6 6 so* 1 4-dichloro-2-butens
18 6 6 so* Dichlorodifluoromethene
6 6 6 see 1,1-dichloroothane
6 6 6 sss 6 EPA 1,2-dlchloroethane
6 6 6 so* 70 EPAP Trans -l,2-dichloroethene
10 6 6 ass
7'EPA 1.1 -dichloroethylone
6 6 3 Methylene Chloride
6 6 6 so* 0 EPAP 1,2-dichloropropane
6 6 6 see 1,3-dichloropropene
10 6
6 so*
N,N-diethrrlhyydrasino
10 6
6 so*
1,1-dimethylhydrasine
10 •6 6 *so
1,2-dimethylhydraslns
10 6 6 *as Iadomethane
10 6 6 so* . Methacrylonitrile
50 6 6 sss Methenethlol
18 6 6 so* Pentachioroethans
10 6 6 sea 1,1,1,2-tetrachlorethane
6 6 6 sss 1,1,2 2- tetrachlorethano
6 6 6 so* 100 EPA Bromoform
10 6 6 sea
Trichloromethanethiol
10 6 6 sea
Trichloromonofluoromethane
10 6 6 so* 1 2,3-trichloropropsne
10 6 6 so* 2 EPA V1nyl chloride
6 6 6 *so 110 EPAP XyIone-m
10 6 6 sea
Acstonitrlle
10 6 6 sss Acetophenons
10 6 6 sss Warfarin
10 6 6 so* 2-acetylaminofluorene
10 6 6 sss 4-aminobyphenyl
10 6 6 sss 6-(aminomethyl)-3-isoxazolol
10 6 6 so* Amltrole
10 6 6 so* Aniline
;0 O
m m
N ^
O OD
= co

a vvONaA
Constituent
Code Name Units
A76 BROMm1E PPS
AM METHBRO PPS
A77 CARBIDE PPS
A18 CHLBENZ PPB
A79 CHLTHER PPB
ASS CHLFORM PPB
A81 METHCHL PPB
A02 CHMTHER PPB
A63 CBpTONA PPB
A64 DTTBRCHL PPB
ASS DIBRETH PPB
A88 DIBRMET PPB
AST DIBUTEN PPB
A88 DICDIFM PPB
A88 1,1-DIC PPB
A88 12-DIC PPB
A91 TAANDCE PPB
A92 DICETHY PPB
A93 METHYCH PPB
A94 DICPA14E PPB
A96 DICPEHE PPB
ASS NNDIEHY PPB
A97 1,1-DIY PPB
- ASS 1 2-DIY PPB
B01 I6DOUET PPB
602 METHACR PPB
B03 METHTHI PPB
884 PENTACH PPB
B06 1112-tc PPB
060 1122-tc PPB
B88 BROMORM PPB
889 TRCMEOL PPB
B10 TRCMFLM PPB
B12129-trp PPB
B13 VINYIDE PPB
014 M-XYLE PPB
819 ACETILE PPB
B28 ACETOPH PPB
B21 WARFRIN PPB
022 ACEFENE PPB
B23 AMINDYL PPB
824 AMIISOX PPB
826 AMITROL PPB
B28 ANILINE PPB
Table 02-7. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1989. (sheet 6 of 16)
------- Constituent List= WAC 173-303-9806 Constituents -------------------------------
Detectlon Below Drinking Water Standards
Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full Name
6 6 6 aaa Bramoacetone
0 6 6 we Methyl bromide
e 6 6 ees Carbon disulfide
6 6 6 sea 60 EPAP Chlorobanzens
6 6 6 see 2-chlorosthyi vinyl ether
6 6 4 X100 EPA Chloroform
8 6 6 s•• - Methyl chloride
0 6 6 sae Chloromethyyl methyl ether
0 6 6 a•• Crotonaldehyde
9 6 6 se• 0 EPAP 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropens
•6•
se•
w•
•ee 6 EPA
ee• 70 EPAP
7 EPA
e•e 8 EPAP
see
ees
Ne
se•
pe
•s•
•ee 180 EPA
ee•
••e
•e• 2 EPA
440 EPAP
so*
e••
He
s••
•se
e••
•••
1 4-dichloro
Dichlorodifl
1,1-dichloro
1,2-dichloro
Trans- 1 ,2-di
1,1-dichlorc
Msthvlene Ch
N,N-dleth y Ihyydrazlas
11-dimethylhyd^azine
drazlne
I:2-di hanilhy
Methecrylonitrlle
Methansthiol
Pentachloroethans
1,1,1,2-tetrachlorethane
1,1,2 2-tetrachlorethans
Bromolorm
Trlchloromethanethlol
Trichloromonotluoromsthans
1 2,3-trichloropropens
V^nyl chloride
Xylene-m
Acetonitrlle
Acetophenone
Wartarin
2-acstylaminotluorene
4-aminobyphanyyl
6-(sminomsthyl)-3-laoxazolol
Amitrole
Aniline
zo
m m
N (-
O CO
= 03

n vM
D
N i
Constituent
Code Nam* Units
827 ARAYITE PPB
628 AURAYIN PPB
829 BENZCAC PP8
830 BENZAAN PPB
B31 BENDICII PPB
B32 BENTHOL PPB
B33 BEHOINE PPS
834 BENZBFL PPB
036 BENZJFL PPB
038 PBENZQU PPB
B37 BENZCHL PPB
B38 BIS2CH4 PPB
B39 BIS2CHE PPB
840 BIS2EPH PPB
841 BROPHEN PPB
842 BUTBEUP PPB
643 BUTDINP PPB
844 CHALETH PPB
846 CHLANIL PPB
848 CHLCRES PPB
047 CHLEPDX PPB
B48 CHLNAPH PPB
849 CHLPHEN PPB
060 CHRYSEN PPB
861 CRESOLS PPB
862 CYCHDIN PPB
863 DIBAJAC PPB
064 DIBAJAC PPB
866 DIBAHAN PPB
860 DIBCOCA PPB
B67 DIBAEPY PPB
868 DIBAIPY PPB
B69 DIBAIPY PPB
806 DIBPHTH PPB
881 12-dben PPB
B82 13-dben PPB
883 14-dben PPB
804 DICHBEN PPB
806 24-dchp PPB
886 28-dchp PPB
B87 DIEPHTH PPB
B88 DIHYSAF PPB
B09 DIIIETHS PPB
870 DIUEA110 PPB
Table D2-7. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November'1989. (sheet 7 of 16)
Constituent List= WAC 173-303-0006 Constituents
Detection Below Drinking Water Standards
Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full Name
10 6 6 see
10 6 6 see
10 6 6 see
10 6 6 *as
10 6 6 *so
10 6 6 see
Is, 6 6 see
10 6 6 see
10 6 6 •e•
10 6 6 *to
10 6 6 *so
30 6 6 *so
10 6 6 so*
10 6 6 sea
10 6 6 so*
10 6 6 e•e
10 6 6 *so
10 6 6 sss
10 6 6 see
10 6 6 see
10 6 6 see
10 6 6 eee
10 6 6 see
18 6 6 *so
10 6 6 see
10 6 6 *as
10 6 6 see
10 6 6 see
10 6 6 •ss
10 6 6 $to
10 6 6 see
10 6 6 ess
10 6 6 eee
10 6 6 *so
10 6 6 ass
10 6 6 see
10 6 6 see
10 6 6 so*
10 6 6 ese
10 6 6 see
10 6 6 see
10 6 6 ese
10 6 6 see
10 6 5 *so
Aruaits
Auramin•
8•ni[c)acridin•
Ben: • snthr•un•
Benzene, dichloromethyl
Benzenetholl
B•nzldlne
Benzo b fluoranthene
Benno ) fluoranth•ne
P benzoqulnone
Benzyl chloride
Bisl2-chloroethoxf) methane
Bis2-chloroethyl ether
81s 2-ethylhoxyl) phthalate
4-bromophenylPhenyl other
Butyl bonzyl phthalate
2-sec-butyl-4,8-dinitrophsnol
Chloro•Ikyl ethers
P-chloro•nlllne
P-chloro-o-cresol
6 EPAP 1-chloro-2,3-%oxypropane
2-chloronsphthal an.
2-chlorophenol
Chrysens
Cresols
2-eyelohex 1-4 0-dinitrophenol
Olbenz[a,h •cridine
Dibenz(s,) •cridin•
Dlbenz a, anthracene
7H-dlbenzo c, 9 1 carbazole
Dlbenzo a,e pyrene
Dlben zo a.A oyrone
Dl-n-butyl phthalate
1,2-dlchlorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
76 EPA p-Dichlorobenzene
3,3'-dlchlorobenzidlne
2,4-dlchlorophenol
2 0-di chlorophenol
D i othyl phthalate
Dihydros afrole
3,3'-dimethoxybenzidine
P-dimathy laminoozobenzens
Mo°
M m
N ^
o Les
= 00
A

D
M
v 0Niarn
Constituent
Code Name Units
871 DIi1BENZ PPS
B72 DIWEYLB PPB
B73 THIONOX PPB
871 DIYPHAY PPB
B76 DIYPHTH PPB
B77 DINBENZ PPB
676 DINCRES PPB
B79 DINPHEN PPB
1188 24-dint PPB
881 26-dint PPB
982 DIOPHTH PPB
BOB DIPHAYI PP8
B84 DIPHHYD PPB
986 DIPRNIT PPB
B88 ETHYINE PPB
887 ETHIIETS PPB
868 FLUORAN PPB
889 HEXCBEN PPB
898 HEXCBUT PPB
891 HEXCCYC PPB
B02 HEXCETH PPB
1393 INDENOP PPB
691 ISOSOLE PPB
B96 YALOILE PPB
896 YELPHAL PPB
897 YETHAPY PPB
BOO YETHNYL PPB
BOO YETAZIR PPB
C61 METCHAN PPB
C52 IIETBISC PPB
CO3 YETACTO PPB
C04 YETACRY PPB
CISYETYSUL PPB
CBS UETPROP PPB
C87 YETHIOU PP9
Cos NAPH4UI PPB
Cog I-naphs PPB
C18 2-na A hs PPB
CI1 NI7RANI PPB
C12 NITBENZ PPB
CIS NITPHEN PPB
C14 HNIBUTY PPB
C16 iNIDIEA PPS
C18 NNIDIEY PPB
Table D2- 7. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1989. (sheet 8 of 16)
------- Constituent List= WAC 173-303-9906 Constituents
Detection Below Drinking Water Standards
Limit Sampl es Detection Standard Agency Ex ce eded
I06 6 see
10 6 6 *so
10 6 6 see
10 6 6 sss
106 6 sea
10 6 6 see
70 6 6 sea
is 6 6 see
10 6 6 sss
16 6 6 as*
10 6 6 see
10 6 6 sss
I0 6 6 so*
10 6 6 as*
10 6 6 so*
10 6 6 sea
Is 6 6 as*
10 6 6 *as
106 6 see
10 6 6 sss
10 6 6 sss
10 6 6 sea
is 6 6 so*
10 6 6 sea
is 6 6 sss
106 6 so*
Is 6 6 so*
16 6 6 so*
is 6 6 see
is 6 6 so*
is 6 6 sss
is 6 6 sss
is 6 6 as*
is 6 6 as*
is 6 6 sea
is 6 6 sea
is6 6 ass
Is 6 6 ees
Is 6 6 *so
is 6 6 sea
10 6 6 ass
10 6 6 so*
10 6 6 sss
Is 6 6 so*
Full Name
7 12-di"thylbenzialanthracone
B,3'-dimethylbanx((d no
Thlofanox
Alpha alpha-dim thylphenethy lamine
Dls»thyI phthalate
Dlnitrobenzane
4 , 6-dinitro-o-cresol and salts
2,1-dlnitrophenol
2.1-dlnitrotolueno
2 6-din itrotoluene
D I -n-octyl ►hthslato
Olphenylamine
1 2-diphenylhydrazine
Dl -n-prolylnitro samine
Ethylene mine
Ethyl methaneaulfonate
Fluoranthene
Nexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadione
Hexschlorocyclopontodions
Haxaahloroethene
Indano(12^3-cd),pyrane
ISO fr0'a
Yalononitrile
YalpPhalon
Yethapyrllane
Yetholonyl
none
r-nitroonpone
Nltrobenxlns
pp Nitrophenol
N-nitrosodl-n-butyylamino
N-nitrosodlethanolamine
N-nitrosodlethylamine
a(2-chlorooniline)
proplonaldehyde-
0
m m
N ro
co
= 00

n v0Ni
A
V
Table D2-7. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1989. (sheet 9 of 16)
Constituent List= WAC 173-303-9006 Constituents
Constituent Detection Below Drinklnp Water Standards
Code Noma Units Limit Samples Detection Standard Agency Exceeded Full Name
C17 NNIDIYE PPB 10 6 6 so * N-n i trosod I"thy l sml no
Cis NNIUETH PPB 10 6 6 *so N-nitrosomethylethylemine
CIO
C20 NNIURET
NIIVINY PPB
10 6 6 p a N-nitroso-N-mathyylurethane
PPB
10 6 6 sss H-nItrosomsthyyIVInyI amino
C21 NNIYORP PPB 10 6 6 ass N-nitrosomorphollne
C22 NNINICO PPB 10 6 6 see N-nitrosonornlcotins
C23 INIPIPE PPB 10 6 6 sss N-nitrosoplpsridine
C24 NITRPYR PPB is 6 6 * as Nitro sopy rrolidine
C26 NITRTOL PPB 10 6 6 se• 6-nitro-o-toluldins
C28 PENTCHB PPB 10 6 6 *so Pentachlorobanzene
C27 PENTCHN PPB is 6 6 sss Pentachloronitrsbonzone
C28 PENTCHP PPB 69 6 6 see 220 EPAP Pentachloroph*nol
C29 PHENTNN PPB 10 6 6 so* Phansc*tin
C30 PHENINE PPB Is 6 6 see Ph*nylenediamine
C31 PHTHEST PPB is 6 6 ees Phtholic acid *stars
C32 PICOLIN PPB Is 6 6 sss 2-plcollne
C33 PRONIOE PPB 10 6 6 sss Pronamld*
C34 RESERPI PPB is 6 6 see Reserpine
C36 RESORCI PPB is 6 6 sss Resorcinol
C38 SAFROL PPB is 6 • 6 ass Salrol
C37 TETRCHB PPB 18 6 6 ass 1, 2,4,6-totrachlorob*nxone
C39 TETRCHP PPB is 6 6 sea 2,3,4,8-tatrachloroph*nol
C40 THIURAY PPB 10 6 6 *as Thluram
C41 TOLUDIA PPB Is 6 6 *so Toluenedlamin•
C42 OTOLHYD PPB 10 6 6 see 0-toluldlne hydrochloride
U3 TRICHLB PPB 10 6 6 sss 1,2,4-trichlorobenxeno
C44 246-trp PPB 10 6 6 sss 2,4,6-trichlorophenol
C46 248-trp PPB is 6 6 es• 2,1,8-trlchlorophenol
C48 TRIMS PPB Is 6 6 see 0,0,0-triothyyl phosphorothloste
C47 SYYTRIN PPB is 6 6 so* Sym-trinitrobenxen•
U8 TRISPHO PPB is 6 6 sea Trls(2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate
C49 BENIOPY PPB is 6 6 sss Benz*[s]ppyrens
C60 CHLNAPI PPB is 6 6 sss Chlorn•pphazlne
C61 BIS2ETH PPB 10 6 6 *so Bls(2-ch l oro i sopropy l) ether
C62 HEXAENE PPB is 6 6 sss Haxachloropropene
C64 HEXACHL PPB 10 6 6 sss Nexachlorophane
C66 NAPHTHA PPB Is 6 6 sss Naphthalene
C66 123TRI PPB is 6 6 sss 1, 2,3-trlchlorobenzone
CSB 13STRI PPB 10 6 6 *so 18 6-trlchlorobenzene
C69 12347E PP8 10 6 6 so* 1,2,3,4-tetrachloro bo nzen*
C80 1236TE PPB 10 6 6 sea 1 2 3 6-totrachlorobenzone
C61
C82 TETEPYR
CHLLATE PPB
2 6 6 ass Tot^oothylpy roph osphate
PPB
300 6
6
ChlorobenNiste
C63 CARBPHT PPB
2 6
6 *so
so * Carbophanothlon
r
0
zo
m m
w ^
O W
= 00
^+ A

a ^o
v
0
N i
oo
ao
.1 y
Table D2-7. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1989. (sheet 10 of 16)
--------- Constituent List= WAC 171-303-0906 Constituents
Constituent Detection Below
Code Nome Units Limit Samples Detection
C64 DISULFO PPS 2 6 6 see
C86 DIUETHO PPS 2 6 6 eee
C88 UETHPAR PPB 2 6 6 see
C87 PARATHI PPB 2 6 6 see
C70 CYANIDE PPB 10 6 6 see
C71 FORUALN PPB 600 6 6 see
C77 PERCHLO PPB 600 6 6 *as
CIS SULFIDE PPB 1000 6 6 see
C79 KEROSEN PPB 10000 6 6 see
CBS AUUDNIU`PPB 60 6 6 so*
C87 CITRUSR PPB 1000 6 6 ass
C88 PARALDE PPB 10000 6 6 see
Cot STRYCHN PPB 68 6 6 ass
C92 UALHYDR PPB 690 6 6 see
COS NICOTIN PPB 109 6 6 ass
C04 ACRYIDE PPB 10000 6 6 *as
Cob ALLYLAL PPB 10000 6 6 *so
Cob CHLPROP PPB 10000 6 6 ese
Dal PCDD's PPB .0100 6 6 eee
D02 PCDF's PPB .0109 6 6 see
D03 2378TCO PPB .0100 6 6 see
H03 ETHCARB PPB 10000 6 6 see
H94 ETHCYAN PPB 10000 6 6 ass
H06 ETHOXID PPB 10 6 6 ees
Has ETHUETH PPB 30 6 6 *so
Hog ISOBUTY PPB 10000 6 6 sea
Hit PROPYLA PPB 10000 6 6 see
H12 PROPYNO PPB 10000 6 6 ees
H16 2 4 6-T PPB
2 6
6 ass
H48 FIHALLI PPB
6 6
6 *so
H82 LHYDRAI PPB 30 6 6 ass
Hat HEXONE PPB 19 6 6 sae
I01 ACETONE PPB 19 6 6 sea
I08 ISOPHER PPB 19 6 6 ass
109 BUTANOL PPB 10000 6 6 ese
I21 TRIBUPH PPB 10 6 6 eee
128 TAF PPB 10 6 6 ass
I29 ACENAPH PPS 10 6 6 see
I36 FLREHE PPB 10 6 6 see
I31 ANTHRA PPB 10 6 6 *so
132 PYRENE PPB 10 6 6 eee
133 ETHBENI PPB 6 6 6 ass
I34 STYRENE PPB 6 6 6 so*
I42 BDCU PPB 6 6 6 ass
Drinklnaa Water Standards
$Landard Agency Exceeded Full Noma
Disulfoton
Dimethoote
Methyl parathion
Parathion
Cyanide
Formailn
Perchlorate
Sulfide
Ker osene
Ammonium Ion
Citrus red
Paraldehyde
Strychnine
Ualoic hydrizlde
Nicotinic meld
0 EPAP Aerylamide
Allyyl alcohol
3-chloroproplonitrlle
Pcdd's
Pcdf's
_ 2,3,7,8 TCDD
Ethyl carbom n te
Ethyl cyanide
Ethylene oxide
Ethyyl mthacrylate
butyl alcohol
Is*
N-propylamine
2-prop -1-01
2.4 6-T
Thallium, filtered
Hydrazine, Low Detection Level
Ysthyl Isobutyl Ketone
Tributylphosphoric Acid
Acensphthens
Fluorene
Anthracene
Pyrena
X 680 EPAP Ethyl benzene
140 EPAP Styrene
100 EPA Bromodichloromethane.
0
m m
N .Tr1
O OJ
00
^ .aI

av
v
0
N i
A
e
Constituent Detection Below
Cods Name Units Limit Samples Detection
I43 CDBM PP8 6 5 6 sae
I64 2NITPH PPB i0 5 6 ass
I87 ETHANOL PPB 10000 5 6 ass
I76 2MEHAPH PPB 10 6 6 ass
I82 PHENANT PPB 10 6 6 ass
J43 BENZALC PPB 10 6 6 as*
J89 2HE%ANO PPB 60 5 6 so*
J71 BHZKFLU PPB 10 6 6 sea
J03 BGHTPER PPB 10 6 6 ses
J86 DINOSEB PPB 10 6 6 sss
J61 DIALLAT PPB 10 6 6 *so
K62 NWIPHA PPB 10 6 6 so*
K56 DIBENFR PPB 10 6 6 so*
K68 ACENATL PP8 10 6 6 sss
L28 MBP PPB 10000 6 6 ess
L21 DBP PPB 10000 6 6 sea
L46 ALLYLCL PPB 100 6 6 see
L46 CLETHAN PPB 10 6 6 sss
L48 PROM PPB 6 5 6 ses
L49 VINYLAC PPB 6 6 6 sae
LSD 02CLMEE PPB 10 6 6 sss
L62 DIPHOS PPB 18 6 6 so*
L53 ISODRIN PPS 10 6 6 as*
L64 ONITANI PPB 18 6 6 sss
L66 MNITANI PPB 10 6 6 see
L68 4NITRUI PP8 10 6 6 see
L67 ETHGLYC PPS 16000 6 6 sss
L69 1PROPAN PPB 10000 6 6 *as
L80 1BUTYN PPB 10000 6 6 so*
L82 ACETONE PPB 10 6 6 sss
L03 14DOEN PPB 5 6 6 sss
L04 CHLR08 PPB 10 6 6 sss
Table D2-7. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1989. (sheet 11 of 16)
Constituent List= WAC 173-303-6006 Constituents
Drinking Water Standards
Standard Agency Exceeded Full Name
100 EPA Chlorodibromomsthans
o-Nltrophenol
Ethanol
2-Mothylnsphtholone
Phonanthrsne
8enzyl Alcohol
2-Nexanone
Benz: ( k)Fluorsnthono
Benzo(G L)Porylene
Dlnoseb
Dlallato
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE
DIBENZOFURAN
ACENAPHTHYLENE
Monobutyl Phosphate
Dibutyl Phosphate
Allyl Chloride
Chloroethane
Propionitrile
Vinyl Acetate
81a(2-ch loro-1-methy lathy l) ether
iethyl-0,2-pyrazlnyl phosphorothion
Mdrin o-141trosnlllne
m-Nltroanlline
4-Nltroqulnollne 1-oxide
Ethylene Glycol
1-Butynol
Acetone - by ABN
76 EPA p-Dlchlorobenzeno
80 EPAP Chlorabonzane (by ABN)
sss - Indicates all samples were reported as below contractua) detection limits
xxx - Indicates that Drinking Water Standards were axceedod- -
ITA - based onKaximum Contaminant tevets in 40 CFR Port 141,
Rational Primary Drinking Mater Regulations
EPAR - based an National Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulations,
Appendix TV, EPA-670 1 8-70-003
EPAP - based on proposed Maximum Cont n minsnt Level Goals In 60 FR 40030
EPAS - based on Secondary Maximum Conteminsnt Levels given In 40 CFR Part 143
Nstional Secondary Drinkln0 Water Ragulatlons
DOE - based on Derived Concentration Guldos, Draft DOE Order 5400.xx, October 10, 1988
'All OE - based on additional Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels given In
WAC 248-64, Public Water Supplies
^°C
m m
H r
o m
= co

A
v
0 N
1
0
Table D2-7. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1989. (sheet 12 of 16)
Contamination Indicator Parameters
DupIIcat* CONDFLD CONDLAB PH-LAB PHFIELD TOC TO%LDL
Well Coll action SamQ I• u"o WHO PPB PPB
nomo data number 1/700n ./700r .01/8.6-8.60 .10/0.6-8.is 2000/. 10/.
2-E19-1 31OCT89 662 7.96 600 1
-•• 29NOVOO 683 6i2 7.30 8.09 200 3
29HOVOO 1 602 643 7.89 8.08 380 6
29MV89 2 661 668 7.80 0.09 300 4
29NOV89 3 689 662 7.89 0.10 300 8
2-EIB-2 27NOV89 278 8.14 100 8
27NOV89 1 283 6.12 700 8
27NOV89 2 286 8.13 100 8
21NOV89 3 201 8.11 800 7
2-E19-3 27NOV09 238 2i7 a 8.08 700 7
27NOV89 1 233 216 8 0.89 00 7
27NOV89 2 236 217 0 8.09 400 6
27NOV89 3 230 248 8.10 0.12 600 0
2-EIB -4 21NOV69 238 278 7.90 8.69 400 0
21NOV89 1 239 268 8 8.11 000 4
21NOV89 2 234 201 9 8.10 700 1
21NOV89 3 238 286 0 6.10 609 17
z°C
m m

D
v v
0
N i
Table D2-7. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1989. (sheet 13 of 16)
Duel lcate FSELENI FPOTASS FSTRONT ALKALIN ALPHAHI ALUMNUM AY-241 ARSENIC
well Collection sample PPB PPB PPB PCI/L PPB PCI/L PPB
name date number 6/10 100/. 10/. 20000/. 4/16 160/. .10/30d 6/68
2-EIS-1 310[780 0 6700 286 4.62 244 .0208

D vv
0
N
N
Table D2-7. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1989. (sheet 14 of 16)
Duplicate PU39 - 40 RADIUM RU-108 SELENUM SILICON FSILICO SODIUM FSODIUM
Well Collection sample PCI/L PCI/L PCI/L PPB PPB PPB PPB PPB
nerve date number 17/1.2d 1/6 172.6/36r 6/10 60/. 60/. 200/. 200/.
2-EIB-1 31OCTSO •.00308 .248 a-28.2 0 16200 18900 26900 27000
29NOVB9
2-EIB - 2 27NOVOO .387 (6 18200 18400 17100 16300
2-EIB-3 27NOVOO e.0742 (6 17206 17200 6410 6700
21NOV89 1 0.0698 (6 17000 17400 6660 6110
2-EIS-4 21NGVB9 .199 (6 17600 17300 10800 9280
Duplicate SR 90 STRONUM SULFATE TC IDS TRITIUM TURBID U
Wall Collection sample PCI/L PPB PPB PPB PCI/L NTU PCI/L
name date number 6/8 10/. 600/260006s 1800/. 60001600000s 600/20000 .10/1 .60/800d
2-E18-1 31OCTOO 0.429 260 146000 24000 347000 *88.3 11 4.68 -
29NOVB9
2-EIS-2
2-EIB- 3
2-EIB-4
27NOVBO
^27NOV89
27NOV89
21NOV89
1
163
160
146
168
16600
16688
23068
21600
24800
26008
23906
700
2.10
1.18
A o
<
Duplicate VANADUM FVANADI ZINC FZINC
Well Collection sample PPB PPB PPB PPB
nam d te number 6/. 6/.
6/60008 616000s 0
e
ca
ai
2-EIS-1 31oCT89 9 a 26 7
20NOV89
2-EIS-2 27NOV89 2Q 22 6 (6
2-EIB-3 27NDVOO 28 27 I6 (6
27NOV89 1 27 ) 28 8 (6
2-EIB-4 21ROV89 21 29 8 (6
Suffix
nano - based onMaximum Contaminant Levels in 40 CFR Part 141,
National Primary Drinking Mater Reputations
r - based on National Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulations,
Appendix IV, EPA-670/9-78-003
p - based on proposed Maximum Contaminant Level Goals In 60 FR 46938
• - based on Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels given In 40 CFO Part 143
National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations
d - based on Derived Concentration Guides, Draft DOE Order 5400.xx, October 10, 1988
w - based on additional Sacondery Maximum Contaminant Levels given In
WAC 248-54, Public Water Supplies
Data Flags
( - Less than Contractual Detection Limit, reported as Limit
- Less t it an Contractual Detection Limit, me as ured value reported
- For radioactive Constituents, reported value is lass than 2-slgms error

n v0N1
w
Table D2-7. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1989. (sheet 15 of 16)
Constit4^pt, Standard
Unitsll 11 n df tc Average Deviation Critical Meg
Conductivity in the
field, who/cm 4 3 11.984 528.4 39.1 1,052.9
pH, field , 4 3 15.145 7.804 0.657 3.316, 18.9.
Total organic carbon,
ppb 4 3 11.984 387.6 156.2 2,480.5
Total organic
halogens, ppb 4 3 .11.984 3.59 0.99 16.8
(a) Data collected August 1988 to June 1989. Values calculated based on
16 comparisons.
(b) The following notations are used in this table:
df - degrees of freedom (n-1).
n = number of background replicate averages.
tc = Bonferroni critical t-value for appropriate df and 16 comparisons.
.'o O
M m
N1'"'
o m
= 00

a
^o
v
0 NI
w
.P
Table D2-7. Constituent List and Summary of Sampling Results
for the 2101-M Pond, November 1989. (sheet 16 of 16)
jARIE 137. Contamination Indicator Parameter Replicate Averages for the
2101-M Pond, November 1989
Constituent Well Semple Replicate Standard Coefficient
Code He" Unite Name Oat* Reps Average Deviation Minimum maximum of variation
088 CONDLAB umho 2-E18-1 29NOVOO 4 647 4.88 642 662 0.8
2-E18-3 27NOVOO 4 247 1.28 246 248 0.6
2-EIS-4 21NOVOO 4 284 4.08 278 287 1.4
181 CONDFLD umho 2-EIB-1 20NOVOO 4 662 1.28 660 663 0.2
2-EIS-2 27NOV89 4 282 2.88 278 286 1.1
2-E18-3 27NOV89 4 234 8.37 230 238 1.4
2-Eli-4 21NOVOO 4 236 2.06 234 238 0.8
188 PHFIELD 2-EIS-1 29NOVOO 4 8.08 0.008 8.08 8.10 0.1
2-E18-2 27NOVOO 4 8.13 0.013 8.11 8.14 0.2
2-E18-3 27NOV89 4 8.10 0.017 8.08 8.12 0.2
2-E18-4 21NOVOO 4 6.10 0.008 8.08 8.11 0.1
207 PH-LAB 2-EIS-1 29NOV89 4 7.68 0.26 7.3 7.8 3.3
2-EIS-3 27NOV89 4 8.02 0.06 8.0 8.1 0.6
2-EIB-4 21NOVOO 4 7.98 0.06 7.9 8.0 0.6
C69 TOC ppb 2-EIB-1 29NOV89 4 276 60 260 300 18.2
2-EIS-2 27NOV69 4 626 160 400 700 28.6
2-EIS-3 27NOV89 4 600 141 400 700 28.3
2-E18-4 21NOV89 4 676 128 400 700 21.9
H42 TOXLDL ppb 2-EIS-1 29NOVOO 4 6.0 2.18 3 e 43.2
2-EIS-2 27NOV89 4 7.3 0.96 6 e 13.2
2-EIB-3 27NOVOO 4 6.3 0.98 6 7 16.3
2-E18-4 21NOV69 4 7.6 2.69 4 11 38.6
0
^o
m m
ti r
o co
= co
a

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Table 02-8. Concentrations Used for Calculation of
Baseline Values. (sheet 1 of 11)
Collection Analyte Detect.
Well Date No. Analyte Name Limit Units Conc.
6-19-43 28-Dec-87 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 312
6-19-43 3-Feb-88 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 310
6-19-43 22-May-88 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 380
6-19-43 16-Sep-88 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 390
6-32-77 5-Feb-86 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 287
6-32-77 15-Nov-87 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 213
6-32-77 4-Jan-88 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 259
6-32-77 11-May-88 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 260
6-32-77 24-Aug-88 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 228
6-55-76 2-Dec-87 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 279
C. 6-55-76 12-Feb-88 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 332
6-55-76 6-Jun-88 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 307
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 369
r 6-55-76 21-Nov-88 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 370
6-67-86 22-Dec-87 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 286
r^4 6-67-86 23-Feb-88 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 279
6-67-86 22-Jun-88 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 294
6-67-86 30-Aug-88 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 194
6-67-86 13-Jan-89 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 295
6-S3-25 8-Jun-87 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 492
6-S3-25 15-Sep-87 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 455
6-S31-1 17-Oct-85 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 235
= 6-S31-1 22-Jun-87 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 220
6-S31-1 24-Aug-87 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 197
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 191 Specific conductance 1 UMHO 220
6-19-43 28-Dec-87 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 7.70
6-19-43 3-Feb-88 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 7.60
6-19-43 22-May-88 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 8.00
6-19-43 16-Sep-88 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 7.80
6-32-77 5-Feb-86 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 7.80
6-32-77 15-Nov-87 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 7.50
6-32-77 4-Jan-88 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 6.30
6-32-77 11-May-88 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 7.70
6-32-77 24-Aug-88 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 7.50
6-55-76 2-Dec-87 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 7.70
6-55-76 12-Feb-88 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 7.50
6-55-76 6-Jun-88 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 7.70
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 8.00
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 8.10
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 8.20
6-67-86 22-Dec-87 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 6.80
6-67-86 23-Feb-88 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 7.90
6-67-86 22-Jun-88 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 7.50
APP D2-55

_.
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Table D2-8. Concentrations Used for Calculation of
Baseline Values. (sheet 2 of 11)
Collection Analyte Detect.
Well Date NO. Analvte Name Limit Units Conc.
6-67-86 30-Aug-88 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 7.60
6-67-86 13-Jan-89 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 7.60
6-S3-25 8-Jun-87 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 7.20
6-S3-25 15-Sep-87 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 7.10
6-S31-1 17-Oct-85 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 7.70
6-S31-1 22-Jun-87 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 7.30
6-S31-1 24-Aug-87 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 7.30
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 199 pH, Field Measurement 0.1 7.70
6-19-43 28-Dec-87 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 335<
6-19-43 3-Feb-88 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 237<
6-19-43 22-May-88 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 359<
6-19-43 16-Sep-88 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 200<
6-32-77 5-Feb-86 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 598<
6-32-77 15-Nov-87 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 276<
6-32-77 4-Jan-88 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 358<
6-32-77 11-May-88 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 263<
6-32-77 24-Aug-88 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 304<
6-55-76 2-Dec-87 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 228<
6-55-76 12-Feb-88 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 170<
6-55-76 6-Jun-88 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 234<
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 200<
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 300<
6-67-86 22-Dec-87 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 175<
° 6-67-86 23-Feb-88 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 431<
6-67-86 22-Jun-88 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 339<
6-67-86 30-Aug-88 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 455<
6-67-86 13-Jan-89 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 200<
6-S3-25 8-Jun-87 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 260<
6-S3-25 15-Sep-87 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 418<
6-S31-1 17-Oct-85 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 1500
6-S31-1 18-Jul-86 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 1000
6-S31-1 22-Jun-87 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 1380
6-S31-1 24-Aug-87 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 1190
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 C69 Total organic carbon 2000 PPB 301<
6-19-43 28-Dec-87 H42 Total Organic Halogen 10 PPB 4<
6-19-43 3-Feb-88 H42 Total Organic Halogen 10 PPB 5.3<
6-19-43 22-May-88 H42 Total Organic Halogen 10 PPB 5<
6-32-77 15-Nov-87 H42 Total Organic Halogen 10 PPB 3<
6-32-77 4-Jan-88 H42 Total Organic Halogen 10 PPB 3.2<
6-32-77 11-May-88 H42 Total Organic Halogen 10 PPB 20<
6-55-76 2-Dec-87 H42 Total Organic Halogen 10 PPB 0.7<
APP D2-56

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Table D2-8. Concentrations Used for Calculation of
Baseline Values. (sheet 3 of 11)
Collection Analyte Detect.
wel l Date NO. Analyte Name Limit Units Conc.
6-55-76 12-Feb-88 H42 Total Organic Halogen 10 PPB 2.4<
6-55-76 6-Jun-88 H42 Total Organic Halogen 10 PPB 11.5<
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 H42 Total Organic Halogen 10 PPB 2<
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 H42 Total Organic Halogen 10 PPB 4<
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 H42 Total Organic Halogen 10 PPB 10<
6-67-86 22-Dec-87 H42 Total Organic Halogen 10 PPB 2<
6-67-86 23-Feb-88 H42 Total Organic Halogen 10 PPB 3.3<
6-67-86 22-Jun-88 H42 Total Organic Halogen 10 PPB 5.9<
6-S3-25 8-Jun-87 H42 Total Organic Halogen 10 PPB 20<
cm 6-S3-25 15-Sep-87 H42 Total Organic Halogen 10 PPB 37.6
6-S31-1 22-Jun-87 H42 Total Organic Halogen 10 PPB 60.8
a 6-S31-1 24-Aug-87 H42 Total Organic Halogen 10 PPB 5.6<
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 H42 Total Organic Halogen 10 PPB 0.9<
6-19-43 28-Dec-87 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 7880
6-19-43 3-Feb-88 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 6590
6-19-43 22-May-88 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 6550
6-19-43 16-Sep-88 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 6490
6-32-77 5-Feb-86 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 7480
6-32-77 15-Nov-87 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 7530
€ 6-32-77 4-Jan-88 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 8130
6-32-77 11-May-88 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 7220
i 6-32-77 24-Aug-88 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 5810
6-55-76 2-Dec-87 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 22900
6-55-76 12-Feb-88 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 24500
6-55-76 6-Jun-88 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 23900
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 22200
6-67-86 22-Dec-87 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 4960
6-67-86 23-Feb-88 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 4860
6-67-86 22-Jun-88 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 5190
6-67-86 30-Aug-88 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 4770
6-67-86 13-Jan-89 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 4700
6-S3-25 8-Jun-87 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 24100
6-S3-25 15-Sep-87 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 22700
6-S31-1 17-Oct-85 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 4680
6-S31-1 22-Jun-87 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 5540
6-S31-1 24-Aug-87 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 5330
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 C75 Chloride 500 PPB 5120
6-19-43 28-Dec-87 A17 Manganese 5 PPB 6
6-32-77 5-Feb-86 A17 Manganese 5 PPB 8
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 A17 Manganese 5 PPB 21
APP D2-57

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Table D2-8. Concentrations Used for Calculation of
Baseline Values. (sheet 4 of 11)
Collection Analyte Detect.
Well Date No. Analvte Name Limit nits Conc.
6-S31-1 17-Oct-85 A17 Manganese 5 PPB 5
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 A17 Manganese 5 PPB 5<
6-19-43 3-Feb-88 H29 Manganese, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-19-43 22-May-88 H29 Manganese, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-19-43 16-Sep-88 H29 Manganese, filtered 5 PPB 7
6-32-77 15-Nov-87 H29 Manganese, filtered 5 PPB 5<
r- 6-32-77 4-Jan-88 H29 Manganese, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-32-77 11-May-88 H29 Manganese, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-32-77 24-Aug-88 H29 Manganese, filtered 5 PPB 5<
r
6-55-76 2-Dec-87 H29 Manganese, filtered 5 PPB 47
6-55-76 12-Feb-88 H29 Manganese, filtered 5 PPB 20
6-55-76 6-Jun-88 H29 Manganese, filtered 5 PPB 30
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 H29 Manganese, filtered 5 PPB 15
6-67-86 22-Dec-87 H29 Manganese, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-67-86 23-Feb-88 H29 Manganese, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-67-86 22-Jun-88 H29 Manganese, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-67-86 30-Aug-88 H29 Manganese, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-67-86 13-Jan-89 H29 Manganese, filtered 5 PPB 5< .
6-S31-1 22-Jun-87 H29 Manganese, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-S31-1 24-Aug-87 H29 Manganese, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 H29 Manganese, filtered 5 PPB 5<
w 6-19-43 28-Dec-87 All Sodium 200 PPB 20100
6-32-77 5-Feb-86 All Sodium 200 PPB 21500
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 All Sodium 200 PPB 9950
6-S31-1 17-Oct-85 All Sodium 200 PPB 8580
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 All Sodium 200 PPB 9440
6-19-43 3-Feb-88 H24 Sodium, filtered 200 PPB 17400
6-19-43 22-May-88 H24 Sodium, filtered 200 PPB 18400
6-19-43 16-Sep-88 H24 Sodium, filtered 200 PPB 21800
6-32-77 15-Nov-87 H24 Sodium, filtered 200 PPB 21600
6-32-77 4-Jan-88 H24 Sodium, filtered 200 PPB 19800
6-32-77 11-May-88 H24 Sodium, filtered 200 PPB 17700
6-32-77 24-Aug-88 H24 Sodium, filtered 200 PPB 19500
6-55-76 2-Dec-87 H24 Sodium, filtered 200 PPB 9160
6-55-76 12-Feb-88 H24 Sodium, filtered 200 PPB 9270
6-55-76 6-Jun-88 H24 Sodium, filtered 200 PPB 10100
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 H24 Sodium, filtered 200 PPB 10200
6-67-86 22-Dec-87 H24 Sodium, filtered 200 PPB 18000
APP D2-58

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Table D2-8. Concentrations Used for Calculation of
Baseline Values. (sheet 5 of 11)
Collection Analyte Detect.
Well Date NO. Analyte Name lima Units Conc.
6-67-86 23-Feb-88 H24 Sodium, filtered 200 PPB 15700
6-67-86 22-Jun-88 H24 Sodium, filtered 200 PPB 15700
6-67-86 30-Aug-88 H24 Sodium, filtered 200 PPB 18600
6-67-86 13-Jan-89 H24 Sodium, filtered 200 PPB 16000
6-S3-25 8-Jun-87 H24 Sodium, filtered 200 PPB 25300
6-S3-25 15-Sep-87 H24 Sodium, filtered 200 PPB 22200
6-S31-1 22-Jun-87 H24 Sodium, filtered 200 PPB 8990
6-S31-1 24-Aug-87 H24 Sodium, filtered 200 PPB 8500
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 H24 Sodium, filtered 200 PPB 9060
6-19-43 28-Dec-87 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 60400
6-19-43 3-Feb-88 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 59000
r: 6-19-43 22-May-88 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 51500
6-19-43 16-Sep-88 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 60500
6-32-77 5-Feb-86 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 18900
6-32-77 15-Nov-87 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 20300
6-32-77 4-Jan-88 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 19700
6-32-77 11-May-88 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 18600
6-32-77 24-Aug-88 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 19800
r_ 6-55-76 2-Dec-87 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 42900
6-55-76 12-Feb-88 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 47300
6-55-76 6-Jun-88 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 43000
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 48100
"y6-67-86 22-Dec-87 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 38000
6-67-86 23-Feb-88 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 37800
6-67-86 22-Jun-88 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 37300
6-67-86 30-Aug-88 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 36100
6-67-86 13-Jan-89 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 36200
6-S3-25 8-Jun-87 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 82400
6-S3-25 15-Sep-87 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 71900
6-S31-1 17-Oct-85 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 16500
6-S31-1 22-Jun-87 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 17700
6-S31-1 24-Aug-87 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 16600
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 C73 Sulfate 500 PPB 17200
6-19-43 28-Dec-87 A20 Arsenic 5 PPB 5<
6-32-77 5-Feb-86 A20 Arsenic 5 PPB 5<
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 A20 Arsenic 5 PPB 5<
6-S31-1 17-Oct-85 A20 Arsenic 5 PPB 5<
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 A20 Arsenic 5 PPB 6
APP D2-59

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Table D2-8. Concentrations Used for Calculation of
Baseline Values. (sheet 6 of 11)
Collection Analyte Detect.
Well Date No. Analvte Name Limit Units Conc.
6-19-43 3-Feb-88 H37 Arsenic, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-19-43 22-May-88 H37 Arsenic, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-32-77 15-Nov-87 H37 Arsenic, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-32-77 4-Jan-88 H37 Arsenic, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-32-77 11-May-88 H37 Arsenic, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-55-76 2-Dec-87 H37 Arsenic, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-55-76 12-Feb-88 H37 Arsenic, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-55-76 6-Jun-88 H37 Arsenic, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 H37 Arsenic, filtered 5 PPB 5<
LC! 6-67-86 22-Dec-87 H37 Arsenic, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-67-86 23-Feb-88 H37 Arsenic, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-67-86 22-Jun-88 H37 Arsenic, filtered 5 PPB 5<
Cn.
6-S3-25 8-Jun-87 H37 Arsenic, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-S3-25 15-Sep-87 H37 Arsenic, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-S31-1 22-Jun-87 H37 Arsenic, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-S31-1 24-Aug-87 H37 Arsenic, filtered 5 PPB 6
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 H37 Arsenic, filtered 5 PPB 6
6-19-43 28-Dec-87 A06 Barium 6 PPB 56
6-32-77 5-Feb-86 A06 Barium 6 PPB 21
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 A06 Barium 6 PPB 20
` 6-S31-1 17-Oct-85 A06 Barium 6 PPB 12
.c. 6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 A06 Barium 6 PPB 12
w
6-19-43 3-Feb-88 H2O Barium, filtered 6 PPB 54
6-19-43 22-May-88 H2O Barium, filtered 6 PPB 50
6-19-43 16-Sep-88 H2O Barium, filtered 6 PPB 58
6-32-77 15-Nov-87 H2O Barium, filtered 6 PPB 27
6-32-77 4-Jan-88 H2O Barium, filtered 6 PPB 7
6-32-77 11-May-88 H2O Barium, filtered 6 PPB 24
6-32-77 24-Aug-88 H2O Barium, filtered 6 PPB 22
6-55-76 2-Dec-87 H2O Barium, filtered 6 PPB 23
6-55-76 12-Feb-88 H2O Barium, filtered 6 PPB 24
6-55-76 6-Jun-88 H2O Barium, filtered 6 PPB 27
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 H2O Barium, filtered 6 PPB 19
6-67-86 22-Dec-87 H2O Barium, filtered 6 PPB 17
6-67-86 23-Feb-88 H2O Barium, filtered 6 PPB 13
6-67-86 22-Jun-88 H2O Barium, filtered 6 PPB 14
6-67-86 30-Aug-88 H2O Barium, filtered 6 PPB 17
6-67-86 13-Jan-89 H2O Barium, filtered 6 PPB 12
6-S3-25 8-Jun-87 H2O Barium, filtered 6 PPB 66
6-S3-25 15-Sep-87 H2O Barium, filtered 6 PPB 64
6-S31-1 22-Jun-87 H2O Barium, filtered 6 PPB 19
APP D2-60

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Table D2-8. Concentrations Used for Calculation of
Baseline Values. (sheet 7 of 11)
Collection Analyte Detect.
Well Date No. Analyte Name Limit Units Conc.
6-S31-1 24-Aug-87 H2O Barium, filtered 6 PPB 19
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 H2O Barium, filtered 6 PPB 6<
6-19-43 28-Dec-87 A07 Cadmium 2 PPB 2<
6-32-77 5-Feb-86 A07 Cadmium 2 PPB 2<
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 A07 Cadmium 2 PPB 2<
6-S31-1 17-Oct-85 A07 Cadmium 2 PPB 2<
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 A07 Cadmium 2 PPB 2<
R 6-19-43 3-Feb-88 H21 Cadmium, filtered 2 PPB 2<
6-19-43 22-May-88 H21 Cadmium, filtered 2 PPB 2<
F - 6-19-43 16-Sep-88 H21 Cadmium, filtered 2 PPB 2<
6-32-77 15-Nov-87 H21 Cadmium, filtered 2 PPB 2<
6-32-77 4-Jan-88 H21 Cadmium, filtered 2 PPB 2<
6-32-77 11-May-88 H21 Cadmium, filtered 2 PPB 2<
6-32-77 24-Aug-88 H21 Cadmium, filtered 2 PPB 2<
6-55-76 2-Dec-87 H21 Cadmium, filtered 2 PPB 2<
6-55-76 12-Feb-88 H21 Cadmium, filtered' 2 PPB 2<
x- 6-55-76 6-Jun-88 H21 Cadmium, filtered 2 PPB 2<
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 H21 Cadmium, filtered 2 PPB 2<
6-67-86 22-Dec-87 H21 Cadmium, filtered 2 PPB 2
6-67-86 23-Feb-88 H21 Cadmium, filtered 2 PPB 2<
6-67-86 22-Jun-88 H21 Cadmium, filtered 2 PPB 2<
6-67-86 30-Aug-88 H21 Cadmium, filtered 2 PPB 2<
6-67-86 13-Jan-89 H21 Cadmium, filtered 2 PPB 2<
£3, 6-S3-25 8-Jun-87 H21 Cadmium, filtered 2 PPB 2<
6-S3-25 15-Sep-87 H21 Cadmium, filtered 2 PPB 2<
6-S31-1 22-Jun-87 H21 Cadmium, filtered 2 PPB 2<
6-S31-1 24-Aug-87 H21 Cadmium, filtered 2 PPB 2<
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 H21 Cadmium, filtered 2 PPB 2<
6-19-43 28-Dec-87 A08 Chromium 10 PPB 10<
6-32-77 5-Feb-86 A08 Chromium 10 PPB 10<
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 A08 Chromium 10 PPB 10<
6-S31-1 17-Oct-85 A08 Chromium 10 PPB 10<
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 A08 Chromium 10 PPB 10<
6-19-43 3-Feb-88 H22 Chromium, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-19-43 22-May-88 H22 Chromium, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-19-43 16-Sep-88 H22 Chromium, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-32-77 15-Nov-87 H22 Chromium, filtered 10 PPB 10<
APP D2-61

Pte,
rq
°.r
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Table D2-8. Concentrations Used for Calculation of
Baseline Values. (sheet 8 of 11)
Collection Analyte Detect.
Well Date No. Analyte Name Limit Units Conc.
6-32-77 4-Jan-88 H22 Chromium, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-32-77 11-May-88 H22 Chromium, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-32-77 24-Aug-88 H22 Chromium, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-55-76 2-Dec-87 H22 Chromium, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-55-76 12-Feb-88 H22 Chromium, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-55-76 6-Jun-88 H22 Chromium, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 H22 Chromium, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-67-86 22-Dec-87 H22 Chromium, filtered 10 PPB 18
6-67-86 23-Feb-88 H22 Chromium, filtered 10 PPB 20
6-67-86 22-Jun-88 H22 Chromium, filtered 10 PPB 21
6-67-86 30-Aug-88 H22 Chromium, filtered 10 PPB 26
6-67-86 13-Jan-89 H22 Chromium, filtered 10 PPB 25
6-S3-25 8-Jun-87 H22 Chromium, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-S3-25 15-Sep-87 H22 Chromium, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-S31-1 22-Jun-87 H22 Chromium, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-S31-1 24-Aug-87 H22 Chromium, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 H22 Chromium, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-S31-1 17-Oct-85 A09 Lead 30 PPB 30<
6-19-43 3-Feb-88 H41 Lead, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-19-43 22-May-88 H41 Lead, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-32-77 15-Nov-87 H41 Lead, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-32-77 4-Jan-88 H41 Lead, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-32-77 11-May-88 H41 Lead, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-55-76 2-Dec-87 H41 Lead, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-55-76 12-Feb-88 H41 Lead, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-55-76 6-Jun-88 H41 Lead, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 H41 Lead, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-67-86 22-Dec-87 H41 Lead, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-67-86 23-Feb-88 H41 Lead, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-67-86 22-Jun-88 H41 Lead, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-S3-25 8-Jun-87 H41 Lead, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-S3-25 15-Sep-87 H41 Lead, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-S31-1 22-Jun-87 H41 Lead, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-S31-1 24-Aug-87 H41 Lead, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 H41 Lead, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-19-43 28-Dec-87 A22 Selenium 5 PPB 5<
6-32-77 5-Feb-86 A22 Selenium 5 PPB 5<
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 A22 Selenium 5 PPB 5<
APP D2-62

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Table D2-8. Concentrations Used for Calculation of
Baseline Values. (sheet 9 of 11)
Collection Analyte Detect.
Well Oate No, Analvte Name Limit Units Conc.
6-S31-1 17-Oct-85 A22 Selenium 5 PPB 5<
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 A22 Selenium 5 PPB 5<
6-19-43 3-Feb-88 H39 Selenium, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-19-43 22-May-88 H39 Selenium, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-32-77 15-Nov-87 H39 Selenium, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-32-77 4-Jan-88 H39 Selenium, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-32-77 11-May-88 H39 Selenium, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-55-76 2-Dec-87 H39 Selenium, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-55-76 12-Feb-88 H39 Selenium, filtered 5 PPB 5<
^. 6-55-76 6-Jun-88 H39 Selenium, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 H39 Selenium, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-67-86 22-Dec-87 H39 Selenium, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-67-86 23-Feb-88 H39 Selenium, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-67-86 22-Jun-88 H39 Selenium, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-S3-25 8-Jun-87 H39 Selenium, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-S3-25 15-Sep-87 H39 Selenium, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-S31-1 22-Jun-87 H39 Selenium, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-S31-1 24-Aug-87 H39 Selenium, filtered 5 PPB 5<
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 H39 Selenium, filtered 5 PPB 5<
k
6-19-43 28-Dec-87 A21 Mercury 0.1 PPB 0.1<
6-32-77 5-Feb-86 A21 Mercury 0.1 PPB 0.1<
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 A21 Mercury 0.1 PPB 0.1<
6-S31-1 17-Oct-85 A21 Mercury 0.1 PPB 0.1<
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 A21 Mercury 0.1 PPB 0.1<
6-19-43 3-Feb-88 H38 Mercury, filtered 0.1 PPB 0.1<
6-19-43 22-May-88 H38 Mercury, filtered 0.1 PPB 0.1<
6-32-77 15-Nov-87 H38 Mercury, filtered 0.1 PPB 0.1<
6-32-77 4-Jan-88 H38 Mercury, filtered 0.1 PPB 0.1<
6-32-77 11-May-88 H38 Mercury, filtered 0.1 PPB 0.1<
6-55-76 2-Dec-87 H38 Mercury, filtered 0.1 PPB 0.1<
6-55-76 12-Feb-88 H38 Mercury, filtered 0.1 PPB 0.1<
6-55-76 6-Jun-88 H38 Mercury, filtered 0.1 PPB 0.1<
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 H38 Mercury, filtered 0.1 PPB 0.1<
6-67-86 22-Dec-87 H38 Mercury, filtered 0.1 PPB 0.1<
6-67-86 23-Feb-88 H38 Mercury, filtered 0.1 PPB 0.1<
6-67-86 22-Jun-88 H38 Mercury, filtered 0.1 PPB 0.1<
6-S3-25 8-Jun-87 H38 Mercury, filtered 0.1 PPB 0.1<
6-S3-25 15-Sep-87 H38 Mercury, filtered 0.1 PPB 0.1<
6-S31-1 22-Jun-87 H38 Mercury, filtered 0.1 PPB 0.1<
APP D2-63

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Table D2-8. Concentrations Used for Calculation of
Baseline Values. (sheet 10 of 11)
Collection Analyte Detect.
Well Date No. Analyte Name Limit Units Conc,
6-S31-1 24-Aug-87 H38 Mercury, filtered 0.1 PPB 0.1<
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 H38 Mercury, filtered 0.1 PPB 0.1<
6-19-43 28-Dec-87 AN Silver 10 PPB 10<
6-32-77 5-Feb-86 AN Silver 10 PPB 10<
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 AN Silver 10 PPB 10<
6-S31-1 17-Oct-85 AN Silver 10 PPB 10<
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 A10 Silver 10 PPB 10<
^. 6-19-43 3-Feb-88 H23 Silver, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-19-43 22-May-88 H23 Silver, filtered 10 PPB 10<
ar° 6-19-43 16-Sep-88 H23 Silver, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-32-77 15-Nov-87 H23 Silver, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-32-77 4-Jan-88 H23 Silver, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-32-77 11-May-88 H23 Silver, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-32-77 24-Aug-88 H23 Silver, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-55-76 2-Dec-87 H23 Silver, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-55-76 12-Feb-88 H23 Silver, filtered 10 PPB 10<
u-- 6-55-76 6-Jun-88 H23 Silver, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 H23 Silver, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-67-86 22-Dec-87 H23 Silver, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-67-86 23-Feb-88 H23 Silver, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-67-86 22-Jun-88 H23 Silver, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-67-86 30-Aug-88 H23 Silver, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-67-86 13-Jan-89 H23 Silver, filtered 10 PPB 10<
r. 6-S3-25 8-Jun-87 H23 Silver, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-S3-25 15-Sep-87 H23 Silver, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-S31-1 22-Jun-87 H23 Silver, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-S31-1 24-Aug-87 H23 Silver, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 H23 Silver, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-19-43 28-Dec-87 A13 Copper 10 PPB 10<
6-32-77 5-Feb-86 A13 Copper 10 PPB 10<
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 A13 Copper 10 PPB 10<
6-S31-1 17-Oct-85 A13 Copper 10 PPB 10<
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 A13 Copper 10 PPB 10<
6-19-43 3-Feb-88 H26 Copper, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-19-43 22-May-88 H26 Copper, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-19-43 16-Sep-88 H26 Copper, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-32-77 15-Nov-87 H26 Copper, filtered 10 PPB 10<
APP D2-64

-:
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Table D2-8. Concentrations Used for Calculation of
Baseline Values. (sheet 11 of 11)
Collection Analyte Detect.
Well Date No. Analvte Name ligil Units Conc.
6-32-77 4-Jan-88 H26 Copper, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-32-77 11-May-88 H26 Copper, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-32-77 24-Aug-88 H26 Copper, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-55-76 2-Dec-87 H26 Copper, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-55-76 12-Feb-88 H26 Copper, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-55-76 6-Jun-88 H26 Copper, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-55-76 21-Nov-88 H26 Copper, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-67-86 22-Dec-87 H26 Copper, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-67-86 23-Feb-88 H26 Copper, filtered 10 PPB 12
6-67-86 22-Jun-88 H26 Copper, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-67-86 30-Aug-88 H26 Copper, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-67-86 13-Jan-89 H26 Copper, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-S3-25 8-Jun-87 H26 Copper, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-S3-25 15-Sep-87 H26 Copper, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-S31-1 22-Jun-87 H26 Copper, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-S31-1 24-Aug-87 H26 Copper, filtered 10 PPB 10<
6-S31-1 4-Aug-88 H26 Copper, filtered 10 PPB 10<
APP D2-65

^-B
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1
2
3
4
5 This page intentionally left blank.
APP D2-66

p. .
f°°s
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 APPENDIX E-1
2
3 PHASE II SAMPLING PLAN FOR 2101-M POND
4 AND
5 ADJACENT RAINWATER RUN-OFF DITCH
910313.1346
APP El-i

P^
f
M'Y
1
910313.1346
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
This page intentionally left blank.
APP E1-ii

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
X1'8
19
` 20
e.21
22
C13
24
25
26
27
_28
29
"30
31
32
33
—34
X35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
910313.1346
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
CONTENTS
1.0 PHASE II SAMPLING PLAN FOR 2101-M POND
AND ADJACENT RAINWATER RUN-OFF DITCH . . . . . . . . . . . . . E1-1
1.1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . El-1
2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E1-1
2.1 SOIL DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E1-2
2.2 SITE TOPOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E1-2
2.3 EFFLUENT SOURCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E1-2
3.0 POND WATER SAMPLING DESIGN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E1-2
3.1 SAMPLE DESIGN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E1-3
3.1.1 Size, Shape, and Dimensions . . . . . . . . . . . . E1-3
3.1.2 Inflow and Outflow Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . E1-5
3.1.3 Flow Velocities . . . . . . . . . . . . . E1-6
3.1.4 Sampling Point Accessibility . . . . . . . . . . . E1-6
3.1.5 Sample Point Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E1-6
3.1.6 Sampling Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . El-7
4.0 SOIL SAMPLING DESIGN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E1-7
4.1 SAMPLING DESIGN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E1-10
4.2 SAMPLE LOCATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E1-11
4.2.1 Effluent Depression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E1-11
4.2.2 Pond Arms . . E1-11
4.2.3 Rainwater Run-off Ditch E1-11
4.3 SELECTION OF SAMPLING METHOD . . . . . . . . . .. E1-11
4.4 SELECTION OF ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS FOR
2101-M POND SOIL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E1-13
4.5 APPENDIX IX SAMPLE ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . E1-15
4.6 SAMPLING AND DATA ANALYSIS SCHEDULE . . . . . . . . . . . E1-15
5.0 SAMPLING QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL . . . . . . . . E1-15
5.1 SAMPLE HANDLING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E1-15
5.2 SAMPLE PACKAGING AND SHIPPING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E1-15
5.3 CHAIN OF CUSTODY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E1-15
5.4 FIELD LOGBOOK . . . . . . . . . E1-16
5.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLES . . . . . . . . E1-16
6.0 DATA ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E1-16
7.0 REFERENCES E1-16
APP E1-iii

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Ltt 17
18
r
r
e^+
^s
910313.1346
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
LIST OF FIGURES
E1-1 Proposed Pond Water Sample Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E1-9
E1-2 Sample Points for 2101-M Pond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ei-12
LIST OF TABLES
E1-1 Analyte List for 2101-M Pond Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
E 1-2 Random Numbers Table . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
E1-3 Selected Constituents for Analysis in
2101-M Pond Soils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
APP E1-iv
E1-4
E1-8
E1-14

910313.1346
1.1 INTRODUCTION
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
APPENDIX E-1
1.0 PHASE II SAMPLING PLAN FOR 2101-M POND
This sampling plan is designed to complement the original site
characterization effort at the 2101-M Pond done during 1988 (see
Section B-5). Based on the information learned in the statistical analysis
of the initial sampling data, the top 2 ft of the pond soil need further
evaluation (see Section B-5f and Appendix C-5 for further information). To
do this, the pond soil will be sampled to a depth of 2 ft. There will be
two samples taken from each sampling point. The first sample will be from
0 - 6 in., and the second sample will be from 18 - 24 in. The pond water
also will be sampled to determine the presence of any soluble constituents.
During the 1988 sampling effort the rainwater run-off ditch located
south of the pond, was sampled to determine if its soils had been
contaminated by any of the water from the 2101-M Pond. Because of problems
with laboratory holding times, some of the data obtained from these samples
was useful only as informational data. Therefore, the rainwater run-off
ditch also will be sampled to close the data gaps that exist from the
1988 effort.
The sampling plan is laid out in the following way:
• Background Information
• Pond Water Sampling Design
• Soil Sampling Design
• Sampling Quality Assurance and Quality Control.
2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The 2101-M Pond environment is a unique environment on the Hanford
Site. The average annual discharge volume to the pond is roughly 1.3 M gal.
(Section B, Table B-1). Visually, the site is best described as a U-shaped
surface impoundment, as opposed to a pond. The banks are mild to moderately
steep in nature, depending on location. This, along with heavy vegetation,
make getting large equipment on site without radically disturbing the area
difficult (as was learned during the 1988 sampling effort). This uniqueness
also leads to challenges in sampling the soil on a small interval while
maintaining sample integrity.
APP E1-1

o
F
R-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
910313.1346
2.1 SOIL DESCRIPTION
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
The near surface soils at 2101-M Pond range in texture from a gravellymuddy
sand to a slightly muddy-fine to very-fine sand. These soils have
an approximate hydraulic conductivity (K) of about 1.1 x 10 -2 to
3.5 x 10' 5 cm/sec (Chamness et al. 1990). This sandy soil lends itself well
to percolation of liquids because of high hydraulic conductivity. The soils
beneath the 2101-M Pond vary in texture from coarse, medium, and fine sands
in the upper 200 ft, to gravels and sandy gravels below this depth. The
depth to groundwater in the area is 311 ft (95 m) below ground surface
(Chamness et al. 1990).
2.2 SITE TOPOGRAPHY
The 2101-M Pond area has a general topography that is extremely flat,
averaging roughly 3 ft of slope change in 1,000 ft of distance. The
2101-M Pond and the rainwater run-off ditch are the only major topographic
points of consequence to natural surface drainage patterns. This natural
topography has been altered by the construction of buildings, streets, and
parking lots to the south and east end of the pond area. The drainage of
these features is taken care of through subsurface drains that empty into
the rainwater run-off ditch at its southern end (see Figures I-4 and I-8).
2.3 EFFLUENT SOURCES
There is one source of known inflow to the 2101-M Pond, and one
potential source of inflow. These are the 2101-M Building drain (which is
known), and surface waters by way of surface run-off and subsurface drains
leading to the rainwater run-off ditch (that is indeterminate). Surface
run-off into the pond is generally limited to precipitation off the berms to
the north and south of the pond and the dirt road east of the pond.
The rainwater run-off ditch, as reviewed in previous sections, does not
appear to currently be, or appear to have ever been, connected to the
2101-M Pond system. This ditch receives surface run-off water as described
previously. The movement of this water through the barrier that separates
the 2101-M Pond and the rainwater run-off ditch, is an unlikely occurrence
as discussed in Section I.
3.0 POND WATER SAMPLING DESIGN
This section details the procedures and criteria that will be used in
the sampling of surface waters at the 2101-M Pond. The following are
informational objectives to the sampling of the pond water:
• Comparison of pond water analysis to historical effluent stream
data
APP E1-2

910313.1346
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Use pond water analysis as a screening device for the potential
determination of any additional soil analytes.
In the case of 2101-M Pond, where the effluent water has been
previously characterized at the effluent point, the relative composition of
the pond water will be assumed to be consistent with the results of this
characterization effort (see Section B-3a(4) for further discussion). To
establish validity of this assumption, the samples will be analyzed for
constituents found in Appendix IX of 40 CFR 264 plus certain constituents
specific to the Hanford Site. Table E1-1 lists the target compounds or
group of compounds to be evaluated in 2101-M Pond water.
3.1 POND WATER SAMPLE DESIGN
The nature of the 2101-M Pond environment will affect the method of
sampling chosen. The following factors were considered in the development
of this sampling plan:
• Pond size, shape, and dimensions
• Rates of inflows and outflows from the sample environment
• Flow velocities within the sample environment
• Accessibility of the sample locations.
Each of these bring about the selection of a sampling method by
influencing the number of sampling points, the location of the sampling
points, and the extent of the sampling.
3.1.1 Size, Shape, and Dimensions
From a water sampling standpoint, the 2101-M Pond is more closely
described as a ditch. The bottom of the south arm is at a higher elevation
than that of the north arm. Also, it is wider and slightly longer than the
north arm. The east arm is basically at the same base elevation as the
south arm, and the width is roughly 5 to 10 ft. Because of their proximity
to the effluent discharge pipe, the east and south arm contain water on a
perennial (or nearly so) basis. The north arm contains water only during
those periods when discharge to the pond exceeds the carrying capacity of
the other two arms. Therefore, sampling of pond water will most likely
occur in the south and potentially the east arms, unless at the time of
sampling the north arm also contains a sufficient amount of water.
APP E1-3

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
a_ 23
24
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 Table E1-1. Analyte List for 2101-M Pond Water.
2
3 Ammonium Sulfide
4 Arsenic Thallium
5 Cyanide Total organic carbon (TOC)
6 ICP Metals' Total organic halides (TOX)
7 Fluoride pH
8 Lead Reactivity
9 Mercury Volatile organics
10 Selenium
fS^
11 Semi-volatile organics
910313.1426
NOTE: Information on the method of chemical analysis and the
required precision, accuracy, and minimum detection limits can be found
in Table E2-1.
'ICP targeted metals include:
Barium Sodium
Chromium Strontium
Copper Vanadium
Nickel Zinc.
Silver
b Ion chromatography, includes bromide, chloride, fluoride, nitrate,
nitrite, phosphate, and sulfate, but only fluoride is targeted because of
its concentration level in the 2101-M Pond soils.
APP E1-4

990313.1346
3.1.2 Inflow and Outflow Rates
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
The only established, consistent source of inflow to the 2101-M Pond is
the 2101-M Building effluent pipe. An average flow rate from the pipe has
never been measured. To determine an average flow rate into the pond from
the discharge pipe, the average annual inflow to the pond from Table B-1 is
used. This average estimate is 1,391,296 million gal/yr. This average is
suspected to have varied over the 6 yr period of estimated quantities, and
throughout each year because of variations in seasonal and diurnal demands
on the building HVAC system.
There are no outlets from the pond to other surface water bodies. This
makes the only points of discharge from the pond to the atmosphere by way of
evaporation, and to the soil and underlying sediments by way of percolation.
The rate of evaporation on the Hanford Site is estimated to be 60 in./yr
(Field et al. 1990). For a facility the size of 2101-M Pond this would
equate to roughly 60,780 gal/yr of evaporation. This is based on a
250-ft long trench, with a average width of 6.5 ft (a length of only 250 ft
is used because the entire pond does not contain water on a perennial
basis). Precipitation over the same time frame would add roughly
12,760 gal/yr of water, based on the Hanford Site average annual
precipitation of 6.3 in./yr (Stone et al. 1983), and a surface area of
500 ft x 6.5 ft (the average surface area of the entire pond).
Evapotranspiration through the local plant community is another source of
water loss. The 2101-M Pond plant life consists of grasses, reeds,
cattails, shrubs and trees. The annual evapotranspiration rate for the
Hanford Site is calculated to be 54.75 in. which is roughly 0.15 in./d
(Field et al. 1990). Assuming plant life occupies an area equal to
approximately three-quarters that of the pond, 88,200 gal/yr of water
evapotranspirate. By summing these three components, the annual water loss;
other than percolation, would be calculated as follows:
Evaporation 60,780
Precipitation -12,760 (inflow)
Evapotranspiration 88.200
Total 136,220 gal/yr
(370 gal/d)
The minimum average annual inflow to the pond for the years 1982 - 1988
is 1,391,296 gal/yr as stated earlier. If 136,216 gal/yr of water leaves
the 2101-M Pond environment through evaporation and evapotranspiration an
estimated annual total of 1,255,080 gal/yr to percolates through the soils
beneath the pond. Assuming that the soils beneath the 2101-M Pond have
achieved a state of moisture content equilibrium over the 30 - 40 years that
the pond has received discharges, and is not in a state of annual flux, the
total contribution to the groundwater from the 2101-M Pond is 2-3 gpm.
These numbers seem to indicate that the inflow and outflow rates of the
pond are virtually equal during average conditions. The only difference
APP E1-5

^.s
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 being in the location of the flows. While the outflow is from the entire
2 pond surface or through the pond soil, the inflow is concentrated at a
3 single point. The water at this point is potentially chemically different
4 from the water in the rest of the pond. Therefore, it is concluded that the
5 water at the discharge must be evaluated separately from the rest of the
6 pond.
7
8
9 3.1.3 Flow Velocities
10
11 The source of any measurable flow velocity within the pond is at the
12 effluent pipe. But, because of the size of the effluent depression (1.5-ft
13 deep) formed by over 30+ yr of service (roughly 8 - 10 ft in diameter) the
14 water within the depression, and the pond, remains fairly still.
15
16 The previous information indicates inflow to the pond under average
17 conditions is roughly 2.6 gpm. This yields an average retention time in the
18 depression area of roughly 3.5 hr. Therefore, flow velocities out of the
19 depression area are very small. Because the 2101-M Pond has no outlet other
20 than to groundwater or to the atmosphere, flow velocities are determined to
21 not be of concern when designing the sampling plan.
22
23
24 3.1.4 Sampling Point Accessibility
25
26 The accessibility of the desired sample points is a concern when
27 selecting a sampling method. The 2101-M Pond is an excavated impoundment
28 with both gradual to steep embankments depending on location. To avoid
29 unnecessary contact with the pond water, and to avoid the accidental
30 disturbance of the pond soils or the bank soils during sampling, sampling
31 will need to be performed so that minimal disturbance to the surrounding
32 soils is achieved.
33
34
35 3.1.5 Sample Point Selection
36
37 The previous information indicates that the pond should be divided into
38 two areas for taking water samples. These two areas would be the area that
39 is in the immediate vicinity of the discharge pipe, and the rest of the
40 pond.
41
42 The entire pond, outside of the 10-ft radius of the discharge pipe, was
43 candidate for these sample sites. There is a high probability that the
44 north arm of the pond will not have any water in it at the time of sampling.
45 Therefore, any sample area randomly selected in the north arm also will have
46 a substitute area for it located in either the south or east arm. The east
47 arm areas also may require that a substitute area be selected depending on
48 the time of the year and the amount of water present at the time of
49 sampling. If there is water present in the east arm, but not of sufficient
50 depth or quantity, a substitution area may be required. All such selections
51 will be documented in the field logbook with justification for the selection
52 of the substitute sample area.
910313.1346
APP E1-6

910313.1346
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Because the linear dimension of the pond is roughly 500 ft, four random
numbers between 1 and 50 were selected from a random number table. The
random numbers table used to generate these numbers is presented in
Table E1-2. To determine the random numbers, the process described in
Section B5-a (1.1) was used. The starting point in the table was the
2nd row, 8th column. Each number represents a 10-ft section of the pond
(the first 10 ft, the second 10 ft, and so on) from which a sample can be
taken. Numbers for which a duplicate were required were 14, 20, 26; numbers
not eligible for selection because of proximity to the discharge pipe were
27 and 28. Figure E1-1 shows the selected water sampling areas. Those
areas followed by an (*) are substitutes for north arm areas, those followed
by (**) are substitutes for east arm areas. A fifth water sample will be
taken at the effluent.
3.1.6 Sampling Methods
To achieve proper sampling of the pond water while minimizing sources
of error is complicated by the sometimes shallow depth of the 2101-M Pond.
The preferred sampling method will be the use of a pair of tongs to hold the
sample bottle while a sample is collected by submerging the sample bottle.
If it is determined that there is insufficient depth to use this method,
then a secondary method will be used at the same site. The substitute
method to sample the pond water will involve the use of glass pipettes and a
way of pulling the water into the pipettes by means of a pipette suction
bulb. An array of pipettes of differing volumes will be employed so that
each sample container can be filled with one use of the pipette if possible.
The filling of the sample bottle with a pipette also will minimize the
amount of disturbance to the water as it is put into the sample container.
The pipette will be placed at the bottom of the sample bottle, and then the
water will be slowly released into the container with the pipette remaining
submerged.
4.0 SOIL SAMPLING DESIGN
This section details the procedures and criteria that will be used in
the sampling of soils in the 2101-M Pond. The site has previously been
characterized to a depth of 12 ft. For a discussion of that sampling
effort, refer to Section B-5.
The objectives of Phase II sampling are described as follows:
Characterize the top 2 ft of soils to identify any location or
depth effects of target analytes in these soils
APP E1-7

910313.1346
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Table E1-2. Random Numbers Table.
03 47 43 73 86 36 96 47 36 61 46 98 63 71 62
97 74 24 67 62 42 81 14 57 20 42 53 32 37 32
16 76 62 27 66 56 50 26 71 07 32 90 79 78 53
12 56 85 99 26 96 96 68 27 31 05 03 72 93 15
55 59 56 35 64 38 54 82 46 22 31 62 43 09 90
16 22 77 94 39 49 54 43 54 82 17 37 93 23 78
84 42 17 53 31 57 24 55 06 88 77 04 74 47 67
63 01 63 78 59 16 95 55 67 19 98 10 50 71 75
33 211 12 34 29 78 64 56 07 82 52 42 07 44 38
57 60 86 32 44 09 47 27 96 54 49 17 46 09 62
18 18 07 92 46 44 17 16 58 09 79 83 86 19 62
26 62 38 97 75 84 16 07 44 99 83 11 46 32 24
23 42 40 64 74 82 97 77 77 81 07 45 32 14 08
52 36 28 19 95 50 92 26 11 97 00 56 76 31 38
37 85 94 35 12 83 39 50 08 30 42 34 07 96 88
70 29 17 12 13 40 33 20 38 26 13 89 51 03 74
56 62 18 37 35 96 83 50 87 75 97 12 25 93 47
99 49 57 22 77 88 42 95 45 72 16 64 36 16 00 -
16 08 15 04 72 33 27 14 34 09 45 59 34 68 49
31 16 93 32 43 50 27 89 87 19 20 15 37 00 49
APP E1-8

a vM
w
v 00
3»N 3P.
0 50 100
0 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
sod* In Feet
Rain Water
Run— off Ditch
9 - q
5 8ertn9 ^( II H 1,42
Storm Drain ^
High Berm
• Substitute for North
Arm Sample Area
t7
A O
•• Substitute for Ea st m m
14 Arm Sample Area
® Not Eilillbie to h
be Sampled
o Co
= co
20
11 Dirt Road
Proposed Water Sample Areas
2101—M Phase a
1 Figure E1-l. Proposed Pond Water Sample Areas.
Effluent from 2101—M 140\0e70e0--A

1)
rl-t
-s
ON
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 • Analyze soil samples from the rainwater run-off ditch for those
2 compounds whose holdings times were exceeded during the initial
3 sampling effort
4
5 • Corroborate Phase I soil sample data analysis.
6
7 This previous sampling effort (summer 1988) seems to indicate a
8 variability with location for some of the analytes. To pinpoint these
9 potential variabilities, characterization of the top 2 ft of pond soil on a
10 smaller sampling interval and greater spatial detail, is necessary.
11
12 The one basic criterion analyzed to choose the sampling strategy was
13 pond geometry. The 2101-M Pond is a U-shaped ditch, into which the flows
14 are unequal. As described earlier, the south arm of the system is the arm
15 of preferential flow. It is wider, and slightly longer than the north arm.
16 It is also the area of heavier vegetative growth. However, from the
17 statistical analysis done for the first round of sampling this area of the
18 pond has fewer background exceedances than the other areas. It is theorized
19 that this is because of the leaching effects of the water, that this arm
20 experiences.
21
22 The north arm has historically only contained water when the discharge
23 volume is highest. The statistical analysis would seem to support the
24 theory that because there is variable flow to this arm, there is less
25 leaching of constituents, and therefore, potential buildup.
26
27 The discharge depression area deserves attention for entirely different
28 reasons. Because it is the initial point of discharge and contains water on
29 a perennial basis, preferential sorbing of constituents (especially metals)
30 is theorized in this area. This is supported by the number of exceedances
31 noted in the initial round of sampling (Section C-5).
32
33
34 4.1 SAMPLING DESIGN
35
36 Simple random, stratified random, judgmental, and systematic sampling
37 were evaluated as possible methods for sampling the 2101-M Pond soil and
38 rainwater run-off ditch. Based on statistical information from the initial
39 round of sampling, a combination of judgmental and systematic sampling will
40 be used.
41
42 This selected approach is based on the information from the initial
43 round of sampling that suggests that the areas of greatest concern are in
44 order: (1) the effluent discharge, (2) the north arm, (3) the east arm, and
45 (4) the south arm. With this knowledge, sampling emphasis.will be placed on
46 the discharge area with the rest of the pond receiving uniform coverage.
910313.1346
APP E1-10

910313.1346
4.2 SAMPLE LOCATIONS
4.2.1 Effluent Depression
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision i
The effluent depression point will be sampled once at its center
(point G) and twice at its outer perimeter points F and H (Figure E1-2).
The outer perimeter sample sites will be on the edges leading into the east
and south arms. The next sample points (E and I) will be 10 ft beyond the
perimeter points.
4.2.2 Pond Arms
The three arms of the pond will each contain a minimum of two sample
points. The initial sample points (D and J) will be located 50 ft from the
sample points E and I, along the centerline of the arm. Subsequent sampling
points (A, B, C, K, L) will be located 50 ft apart (Figure E1-2). This
configuration will yield 12 sample points and provide a spatial picture of
the surface soils in the pond.
The sampling points will be located as close to the centerlines of the
pond arms as possible. At points where cobbles make it impossible to obtain
an adequate volume of material to perform analysis, a point as close as
possible to the original one will be used.
4.2.3 Rainwater Run-off Ditch
Because the objective in resampling the rainwater run-off ditch is to
close data gaps that exist because of exceeded sample holding times, the
sampling effort for the ditch in this phase will duplicate the first effort.
The sample points will be as close as possible to those used in the initial
effort (Figure E1-2). A 1-ft sample will be taken from these points and
homogenized, and then a composite taken.
4.3 SELECTION OF SAMPLING METHOD
The sampling method chosen to collect samples from the top 2 ft of the
2101-M Pond soil and the top foot of the rainwater run-off ditch is ASTM
method D 1452-80 (Standard Practice for Soil Investigations and Sampling by
Auger Borings (ASTM 1990)]. At each sampling site, two samples will be
taken: One from 0-6 in. and the other at 18-24 in. To ensure adequate soil
for laboratory analysis, more than one core may need to be taken at each
site. Samples will be combined with their respective depths. The type of
auger bit to be used will be an open tubular or orchard barrel type auger
made of stainless steel and fitted with solid stainless-steel inner rings or
a split sleeve. This method provides a disturbed but representative soil
sample. Because of the vegetation and the steep banks that are present at
the site, a mobile drill rig will not be used to drive the sampling
APP E1-11

n
ro
v
M
N)
N
z
E
t
Proposed Sall Sample Points
2101-M Phase 11
i
1 Figure E1-2. Sample Points for 2101-M Pond.
w"mco-A
0
Mo
M m
w
< a
z
a r
o CO
=m
F+ p

910313.1346
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
equipment. The basic sampling methodology is described in WHC-CM-7-7,
Environmental Investigations and Site Characterization Manual (WHC 1989)
4.4 SELECTION OF ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS
FOR 2101-M POND SOIL
Section B-5 of the 2101-M Pond Closure Plan gives a detailed
explanation of the principles used in the initial round of sampling
activities at 2101-M Pond. The data from this initial sampling effort
suggests that there are only a few potential constituents of concern because
of exceedances of background threshold values in the soils at the
2101-M Pond (Appendix C-5). This should not be construed to exempt other
constituents from further evaluation. Constituents that will compose the
target analyte list for this Phase II sampling plan include the following
general list:
• Constituents known to have been discharged to the pond
• Constituents determined to have exceeded the background threshold
value (Phase I sampling data)
• Constituents whose presence in the initial sample results is of
questionable validity or are present for unknown reasons
• Metals, because of theorized preferential sorbing
• Any constituents that are detected in 2101-M Pond water above
established drinking water standard maximum contamination levels.
A list of those constituents that meet any of the above criteria,
except for the last one, appear in Table E1-3.
There are six organic compounds that were identified in the initial
round of sampling as being present in the 2101-M Pond soils (acetone,
toluene, methylene chloride, ethanol, propanol, and butanoic acid). Three
of which are naturally occurring organic compounds. These three are
butanoic acid, ethanol, and propanol. Butanoic acid occurs naturally at
concentrations of up to 600 ppb, ethanol at concentrations up to 52 ppm, and
propanol at concentrations up to 54 ppm (Dragun 1988). For ethanol and
propanol, the concentration levels found in the first round of sampling are
more than 3 orders of magnitude below naturally occurring levels.
Therefore, ethanol and propanol are not being proposed for revaluation in
this phase of soil sampling. Because butanoic acid was detected at twice a
natural level, it will be revaluated.
APP E1-13

0%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
910313.1346
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Table E1-3. Selected Constituents for Analysis in
2101-M Pond Soils.
Constituent Criteria met
Acids (nitric, hydrochloric)' 1
Acetone 3
Methylene chloride 3
Toluene 3
Butanoic acid 3
Copper 2,4
Barium 1,4
Manganese 4
Silver 3,4
Strontium 2,4
Zinc 2,4
Calcium 2,4
Chromium 4
Sodium 4
Nickel 4
Vanadium 2,4
Aluminum 2,4
Potassium 4
Iron 2,4
Magnesium 2,4
Lead 2,4
Fluoride 2
Ammonium 2
TOC 2
'Because detection of a specific acid so long after
discharge is not possible, pH is used to indicate acidic
conditions.
TOC = total organic carbon
1 = known or highly suspected discharge to pond
2 - exceedance of background threshold level
3 = validity of presence in samples from initial
sampling effort is questionable or is present for
unknown reason
4 = metal (preferential sorbing in upper 2 ft
suspected).
APP E1-14

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 4.5 APPENDIX IX SAMPLE ANALYSIS
2
3 In addition to the target compound analysis that will be requested for
4 the 2101-M Pond soil samples, a specified portion of the 2101-M Pond soil
5 samples will be tested for constituents listed in Appendix IX of 40 CFR 264.
6 This will be done to corroborate the data from the initial sampling effort.
7 Sample points, which will have the Appendix IX list requested, will be the
8 top 6 in, of sample points G and B (Figure E1-2). In addition, the top 2 ft
9 of the dry background site also will be resampled on the same sample
10 interval as the pond and have the Appendix IX analysis run on these
11 two samples. The dry background location can be seen in Figure B-4 and
12 Appendix C-2.
13
14
15 4.6 SAMPLING AND DATA ANALYSIS SCHEDULE
16
c- Figure B-22 (in Section B) establishes a sampling and data analysis
18
schedule for 2101-M Phase II sampling. This schedule is preliminary in
°19 nature and will be dependant upon variables such as regulatory concurrence,
20 analytical laboratory procurement, weather, etc.
E11
2
°,23
-24 5.0 SAMPLING QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL
25
-26
27 5.1 SAMPLE HANDLING
Gu-28
29 The handling of soil samples will follow the procedures outlined in
"30 WHC-CM-7-7, EII 5.2 (WHC 1989). Included in this environmental
31 investigation instruction (EII) are outlines for addressing the following
-32 topics:
_,3
34 • Safety
a35
36 • Records management
37
38 • Training
39
40 • Sampling procedure.
41
42
43 5.2 SAMPLE PACKAGING AND SHIPPING
44
45 Sample packaging and shipping procedures will be followed as required
46 in WHC-CM-7-7 (WHC 1989).
47
48
49 5.3 CHAIN OF CUSTODY
50
51 Chain of Custody will be followed as required by WHC-CM-7-7 (WHC 1989).
910313.1346
APP E1 -15

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
5.4 FIELD LOGBOOK
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
A field logbook will maintained as required by WHC-CM-7-7 (WHC 1989).
5.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLES
The following sampling quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) steps
will be used to establish sample data integrity and to identify any
anomalies within the sampling activities. This is in accordance with "EPA
Administered Permit Programs: The Hazardous Waste Permit Program"
(EPA 1989).
15 Control Frequency of occurrence
_ 16 Trip blanks 1/d
17 (Pond water samples only)
18 Equipment blanks 1/20 samples
° 19 Split/duplicate samples 1/20 samples
" 20 All QA/QC samples will be handled as outlined above.
^.a
21
22
23
24 6.0 DATA ANALYSIS
25
f 26
27 Data analysis will follow the steps outlined in Section B-5c.
28
29
30
31 7.0 REFERENCES
32
33
34 ASTM, 1990, Standard Practice for Soil Investigations and Sampling by Auger
35 Borings,
36
37 Chamness, M. A., S. P. Luttrell, and W. J. Martin, 1990, 2101-M Pond
38 Hydrogeologic Characterization Report, PNL-7468, Pacific Northwest
39 Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
40
41 Dragun, J., 1988, The Soil Chemistry of Hazardous Materials, Hazardous
42 Materials Control Research Institute, Silver Spring, Maryland,
43 pp. 343-345.
44
45 EPA, 1989, "EPA Administered Permit Programs: The Hazardous Waste Permit
46 Program", Federal Register, (Proposed Rules), Vol. 54, No. 13, p. 3227,
47 Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
48
910313.1346
APP E1-16

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 Field, J. G., J. M. Frain, M. A. Olascoaga, 1990, Engineering Study for
2 Purgewater Treatment, WHC-SD-EN-ES-001, Westinghouse Hanford Company,
3 p. 61.
4
5 Stone, W. A., J. M. Thorp, 0. P. Gifford, and D. J. Hoitink, 1983,
6 Climatological Summary for the Hanford Area, PNL-4622, Pacific
7 Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington, p. IV-2.
8
9 WHC, 1989, Environmental Investigations and Site Characterization Manual,
10 WHC-CM-7-7, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.
N
P1R
L P^
910313.1346
APP E1-17

M
1
910313.1346
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
This page intentionally left blank.
APP E1-18

c-
a-
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 APPENDIX E-2
2
3 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR NEAR SURFACE SOIL
4 SAMPLING AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING AT
5 THE 2101-M POND AND RAINWATER RUN-OFF DITCH
6
APP E2-i

lf7
r
rs
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR NEAR SURFACE SOIL
2 SAMPLING AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING AT
3 THE 2101-M POND AND RAINWATER RUN-OFF DITCH
4
5
6 Revision 0
7
8
Westinghouse Hanford Company
9 Environmental Engineering, Technology & Permitting Function
10 Richland, Washington
APP E2-ii

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 CONTENTS
2
3 DEFINITION OF TERMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E2-v
4
5 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E2-1
6 1.1 PROJECT OBJECTIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E2-1
7 1.2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION . . . . E2-1
8 1.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN APPLICABILITY AND
9 RELATIONSHIP TO THE WESTINGHOUSE HANFORD COMPANY
10 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . E2-1
11 1.4 SAMPLING AND TESTING ACTIVITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . E2-1
12
13 2.0 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES . . . . . . . . . E2-2
14 2.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES . . . . . . . . . . E2-2
15 2.2 ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E2-4
16 2.3 OTHER SUPPORT CONTRACTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E2-4
h77
.._18 3.0 OBJECTIVES FOR MEASUREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E2-4
19
X20 4.0 SAMPLING PROCEDURES E2-8
21 4.1 PROCEDURE APPROVALS AND CONTROL E2-8
r^a2 4.1.1 Westinghouse Hanford Procedures . . E2-8
23 4.1.2 Participant Contractor/Subcontractor Procedures E2-9
'24 4.2 SAMPLING AND INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . 'E2-9
25 4.3 PROCEDURE ADDITIONS AND CHANGES . . . . . . . . . . . . E2-9
26
^27 5.0 SAMPLE CUSTODY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E2-10
28
2-9
30
6.0 CALIBRATION PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E2-10
34 7.0 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E2-11
32
-33 8.0 DATA REDUCTION, VALIDATION, AND REPORTING . . . . . . E2-11
4 8.1 DATA REDUCTION AND DATA PACKAGE PREPARATION . . . . . . E2-11
5 8.2 VALIDATION. ..................
36
37
8.3 FINAL REVIEW AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS E2-13
38
39
9.0 INTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E2-14
40
41
10.0 PERFORMANCE AND SYSTEM AUDITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E2-15
42
43
11.0 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E2-15
44
45
12.0 DATA ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E2-16
46
47
13.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E2-16
48
49
14.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E2-16
50 15.0 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E2-17
APP E2-iii

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 LIST OF FIGURES
2
3
4 E2-1 Project Organization, Sampling at 2101-M Pond . . . . . . . . E2-3
5
6
7 LIST OF TABLES
8
9
10 E2-1 Analytes of Interest and Analytical Methods
11 for2101-M Pond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E2-5
12
13 E2-2 Investigative Procedures for 2101-M Pond Water and
14 Near Surface Soil Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E2-7
APP E2-iv

DEFINITIONS OF TERMS
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Accuracy. For the purposes of closure activities, accuracy may be
interpreted as the measure of the bias in a system. Sampling accuracy
normally is assessed through the evaluation of matrix spiked samples and
reference samples.
Audit. For the purposes of closure activities, audits are considered to
be systematic checks to verify the quality of operation of one or more
elements of the total measurement system. In this sense, audits may be of two
types: (1) performance audits, in which quantitative data are independently
obtained for comparison with data routinely obtained in a measurement system
or, (2) system audits, involving a qualitative onsite evaluation of
laboratories or other organizational elements of the measurement system for
compliance.with established quality assurance program and procedure
requirements. For environmental investigations at the Hanford Site,
performance audit requirements are fulfilled by periodic submittal of blind
samples to the primary laboratory or the analysis of split samples by an
independent laboratory. System audit requirements are implemented through the
use of standard surveillance procedures.
Comparability. For the purposes of closure activities, comparability is
an expression of the relative confidence with which one data set may be
compared with another.
Completeness. For the purposes of closure activities, completeness may
be interpreted as a qualitative parameter expressing the percentage of
measurements judged to be valid.
Deviation. For the purpose of closure activities, deviation refers to a
planned departure from established criteria that may be required as a result
of unforeseen field situations or that may be required to correct ambiguities
in procedures that may arise in practical applications.
Eouipment Blanks. Equipment blanks consist of pure deionized, distilled
water washed through decontaminated sampling equipment and placed in
containers identical to those used for actual field samples; they are used to
verify the adequacy of sampling equipment decontamination procedures, and are
normally collected at the same frequency as field duplicate samples.
Field Blanks. Field blanks consist of pure deionized, distilled water,
transferred to a sample container at the site and preserved with the reagent
specified for the analytes of interest; they are used to check for possible
contamination originating with the reagent or the sampling environment, and
are normally collected at the same frequency as field duplicate samples.
Duplicate Sample. Field duplicate samples are samples retrieved from the
same sampling location using the same equipment and sampling technique and
analyzed independently. Laboratory duplicate samples are samples taken
successively from the same sample bulb. Duplicate samples generally are used
to verify the repeatability or reproduceability of analytical data and
APP E2-v

52
itz
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 normally are analyzed with each analytical batch or every 20 samples,
2 whichever is greater.
3
4 Matrix Spiked Samples. Matrix spiked samples are a type of laboratory
5 quality control sample; the samples are prepared by splitting a sample
6 received from the field into two homogeneous aliquots (i.e., replicate
7 samples), and adding a known quantity of a representative analyte of interest
8 to one aliquot in order to calculate percentage of recovery.
9
10 Nonconformance. A nonconformance is a deficiency in characteristic,
11 documentation, or procedure that renders the quality of material, equipment,
12 services, or activities unacceptable or indeterminate. When the deficiency is
13 of a minor nature; does not effect a permanent or significant change in
14 quality if it is not corrected; can be brought into conformance with immediate
15 corrective action; it shall not be categorized as a nonconformance. However,
16 if the nature of the condition is such that it cannot be immediately and
17 satisfactorily corrected, it shall be documented in compliance with approved
18 procedures and brought to the attention of management for disposition and
19 appropriate corrective action.
20
21 Precision. Precision is a measure of the repeatability or
22 reproducibility of specific measurements under a given set of conditions.
23 Specifically, it is a quantitative measure of the variability of a group of
24 measurements compared to their average value. Precision normally is expressed
25 in terms of standard deviation, but also may be expressed as the coefficient
26 of variation (i.e., relative standard deviation) and range (i.e., maximum
27 value minus minimum value). Precision is assessed by means of
28 duplicate/replicate sample analysis.
29
30 Quality Assurance For the purposes of closure activities, Quality
31 Assurance (QA) refers to the total integrated quality planning, quality
32 control, quality assessment, and corrective action activities that
33 collectively ensure that the data from monitoring and analysis meets all end
34 user requirements and/or the intended end use of the data.
35
36 Ouality Assurance Project Plan. The quality assurance project plan
37 (QAPP) is an orderly assembly of management policies, project objectives,
38 methods, and procedures that defines how data of known quality will be
39 produced for a particular project or investigation.
40
41 Quality Control. For the purposes of closure activities, Quality Control
42 (QC) refers to the routine application of procedures and defined methods to
43 the performance of sampling, measurement, and analytical processes.
44
45 Reference Samples. Reference samples are a type of laboratory quality
46 control sample prepared from an independent, traceable standard at a
47 concentration other than that used for analytical equipment calibration, but
48 within the calibration range. Such reference samples are required for every
49 analytical batch or every 20 samples, whichever is greater.
50
APP E2-vi

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 Rep licate Sample. Replicate samples are two aliquots removed from the
2 same sample container in the laboratory and analyzed independently.
3
4 Representativeness. For the purposes of closure activities,
5 representativeness may be interpreted as the degree to which data accurately
6 and precisely represent a characteristic of a population parameter, variations
7 at a sampling point, or an environmental condition. Representativeness is a
8 qualitative parameter which is most concerned with the proper design of a
9 sampling program.
10
11 Split Sample. A split sample is produced through homogenizing a field
12 sample and separating the sample material into two equal aliquots. Field
13 split samples usually are routed to separate laboratories for independent
14 analysis, generally for the purposes of auditing the performance of the
15 primary laboratory relative to a particular sample matrix and analytical
16 method (see the glossary entry for audit). In the laboratory, samples
07 generally are split to create matrix spiked samples (see the glossary entry
18 matrix spiked samples).
'19
20 Validation. For the purposes of closure activities, validation refers to
` 21 a-systematic process of reviewing a body of data against a set of criteria to
2 provide assurance that the data are acceptable for their intended use.
23 Validation methods may include review of verification activities, editing,
­ 24 screening, cross-checking, or technical review.
25
-26 Verification. For the purposes of closure activities, verification
27 refers to the process of determining whether procedures, processes, data, or
-28 documentation conform to specified requirements. Verification activities may
.?9 include inspections, audits, surveillances, or technical review.
30
r^
APP E2-vii

:
n
a
t3ti
1
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
2
3
4
5 This page intentionally left blank.
APP E2-viii

1.1 PROJECT OBJECTIVE
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The primary objective of the Phase II sampling of the 2101-M Pond
environment is to determine the presence (or lack thereof) of constituents in
the top 2 ft of the soil column of the 2101-M Facility.
1.2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The location of 2101-M Pond and general background information are
provided in the closure plan developed for the facility (see
Sections A and B).
1.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN APPLICABILITY AND
RELATIONSHIP TO THE WESTINGHOUSE HANFORD
COMPANY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM
This quality assurance project plan (QAPP) applies specifically to the
field activities and laboratory analyses performed as part of sampling and
testing investigations supporting the closure of the 2101-M Pond at the
Hanford Site. The plan is designed to be implemented in conjunction with the
specific requirements of the 2101-M Pond Closure Plan. The QAPP is prepared
in compliance with the Environmental Engineering. Technology and Permitting
runction uuatity Hssurance vrogram Tian (wmu-tv -U383) (wnlcn is in
preparation). This plan describes the means selected to implement the overall
QA program requirements defined by the Westinghouse Hanford Quality Assurance
Manual (WHC 1989b), as applicable to environmental investigations, while
accommodating the specific requirements for project plan format and content
agreed upon in the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order
(Ecology et al. 1989). The program plan contains a matrix of procedural
resources [from WHC-CM-4-2 and from the Westinghouse Hanford Environmental
investigations ana aize cnaracierization manual (wnu i y a y a)1 tnat nave Deen
drawn upon to support this QAPP. This QAPP is subject to mandatory review and
revision before use on subsequent phases of the investigation. Distribution
and revision control of this plan will be in compliance with procedures QR
6.0, "Document Control," and QI 6.1, "Quality Assurance Document Control," all
from WHC-CM-4-2 (WHC 1989b). All plans and procedures referenced in the QAPP
are available for regulatory review on request by the direction of the
Technical Lead.
1.4 SAMPLING AND TESTING ACTIVITIES
Field sampling activities will include surface water sampling and near
surface soil sampling. A complete description of all activities is provided
in Appendix E-1 of the 2101-M Pond Closure Plan.
APP E2-1

1^
r^
y
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 2.0 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES
2
3
4 The following sections describe the organizations and their
5 responsibilities in conducting investigations at 2101-M Pond.
6
7
8 2.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES
9
10 The Environmental Engineering, Technology and Permitting Function of
11 Westinghouse Hanford Company (Westinghouse Hanford) has primary
12 responsibilities for conducting this investigation. An organizational chart
13 is included as Figure E2-1. The following describe responsibilities of key
14 test personnel and organizations.
15
16 Closure Plan Lead (Regulatory Permitting/NEPA Group)--The Closure Plan
17 Lead is responsible for overall project organization and interface with
18 the regulatory agencies and the DOE.
19
20 Technical Lead--The Technical Lead is responsible for overall direction
21 of sampling and testing activities; responsibilities include the planning
22 and authorization of all work and management of any subcontracted
23 activities, as well as overall technical schedule and budgetary
24 performance.
25
26 Quality Assurance Officer--The Quality Assurance Officer is responsible
27 for overall direction of sampling and testing activities;
28 responsibilities include the planning and authorization of all work and
29 management of any subcontracted activities, as well, as overall technical
30 schedule and budgetary performance.
31
32 Heath and Safety Officer (Environmental Division/Environmental Field
33 Services)--The Health and Safety Officer is responsible for determining
34 potential health and safety hazards from volatile, and/or toxic compounds
35 during sample handling and sampling decontamination activities and has
36 the responsibility and authority to halt field activities because of
37 unacceptable health and safety concerns.
38
39 Field Team Leader--The field team leader is responsible for onsite
40 direction of sampling technicians in compliance with the requirements of
41 the closure plan, this QAPP, and implementing all Environmental
42 Investigations Instructions (EIIs).
43
44 Office of Sample Management (OSM)--The Westinghouse Hanford OSM is
45 responsible for coordinating sample shipments between the field team and
46 the analytical laboratory, resolution of any chain-of-custody issues, and
47 for validation of all analytical data as discussed in Section 8.0.
APP E2-2

.-r
e
F'x
1
U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency
Project Manager
U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency
Unit Manager
Quality Assurance
Officer
Soil and
Sediment Sampling
Technicians
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
U.S. Department
of Energy
Project Manager
--- { U.S. Department
1 of Energy
Unit Manager
Closure Plan Lead
(Westinghouse Hanford
Company Regulatory
Permitting)
LEAD AGENCY
State of Washington
Department of EcoloC
Project Manager
State of Washington
--- J Department of Ecolo(
Unit Manager
Technical Lead----- I Industrial Safety
and Fire Protection
L
Health and
-----Safety Officer
Office of Sample Analytical
Management Laboratory
(OSM)
Figure E2-1. Project Organization, Sampling at 2101-M Pond.
APP E2-3

C71
+e
rn
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 2.2 ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
2
3 Samples shall be routed to an approved Westinghouse Hanford, participant
4 contractor, or subcontractor laboratory, who shall be responsible for
5 performing the analyses identified in this plan in compliance with work orders
6 or contractual requirements and Westinghouse Hanford-approved procedures
7 (Section 4.1.2). At the direction of the Technical Lead, services of
8 alternate qualified laboratories may be procured for the performance of split
9 sample analyses for performance audit purposes. If such an option is
10 selected, the QA plan and applicable analytical procedures from the alternate
11 laboratory also shall be approved by Westinghouse Hanford before their use in
12 compliance with Section 4.1.2 requirements. All analytical laboratory work
13 shall be subject to the surveillance controls invoked by QI 7.3, "Source
14 Surveillance and Inspection" (WHC 1989b).
15
16
17 2.3 OTHER SUPPORT CONTRACTORS
18
19 Support contractors may be assigned project responsibilities at the
20 direction of the Technical Lead. Such services shall be in compliance with
21 standard Westinghouse Hanford procurement procedure requirements as discussed
22 in Section 4.1.2. All work shall be performed in compliance with Westinghouse
23 Hanford approved QA plans and/or procedures, subject to controls of QI 7.3,
24 "Source Surveillance and Inspection" (WHC 1989b).
25
26
27
28 3.0 OBJECTIVES FOR MEASUREMENTS
29
30
31 The purpose of this investigation is to assess the existence, nature, and
32 extent of any contamination in the near surface soils of the 2101-M Pond and
33 rainwater run-off ditch, and the chemical composition of the pond water as it
34 relates to the surrounding environment. As noted in Section 4.6 of Data
35 Quality Objectives for Remedial Response Activities: Volume I Development
36 Process (EPA 1987), universal goals for precision, accuracy,
37 representativeness, completeness, and comparability cannot be practically
38 established at the outset of an investigation. However, data is available
39 from previously negotiated analytical contracts for Hanford Site
40 investigations, the data quality objectives guidance document cited previously
41 (EPA 1987), and from typical capabilities currently expected for laboratories
42 involved in environmental analyses that may be used as minimum guidelines for
43 the selection of analytical methods appropriate for this investigation.
44 Table E2-1 provides preliminary target values for detection limits, precision,
45 and accuracy that are intended for use in initial procurement negotiations
46 with the analytical laboratory. After individual laboratory statements of
47 work are negotiated, and procedures are developed and approved as noted in
48 Section 4.1 and Table E2-2, this section will be revised to reference approved
49 detection limit, precision, and accuracy criteria as project requirements.
50
APP E2-4

19 1 1 1 I : 3
T 1
I Table E2-1. Analytes of Interest and Analytical Methods for 2101-M Pond. ( sheet 1 of 2)
3
4
5
6
7
8 9
10
112
14 n
-o
15 m
N
16
17
18
Analytical
category
Volatile
organics
Analyte of interest
Standard
referen
method
p
MethySene chloride 8240
(Dtc loromethane)
MinimumsMinimum
detecti n
limit`
pp qq
25mmg^Rg
Precision` Accuracy` Comments
p
f 25%
R p
RPD ±25%
Purgeable Toluene 8020 25 mg/Kg ±25% RPD ±25% d
Aromatics
Semi-volatile Butanoic acid 8270 e e e d
organics
Total organic 9060 1.0 mg/Kg ±25% RPD ±25% d
carbon (TOC)
Total organic 9030 , h ±25% RPD ±25% d
(Gdos
Inorganics Aluminium
Cg
Chromium
Calcium
ynese
ckel
tassium
1ver
dium
ro tium
naeium
nr
45.0 m Kg
2.0 mg. g
7.0 mg/K//^
1 0. 0 mIg
7 .0 mg/ Kg
30.0 mg Kg
1.0 mg/Kg
/Rg
15.0 mg
7.0 mg/K^
29.0 m g
2.0 mg^ g
8.0 mg Kg
2.0 mg Kg
mg Kg
250
0.04 m Xg
1.0 mg^ g
2.0 mg/Kg
d
d
0
0
zo
CD m
r
° CO
o oo
s+ 4c

3
5
30
1 Table E2-1. Analytes of Interest and Analytical Methods for 2101-M Pond. (sheet 2 of 2)
nv
m
N 0)
Analytical
category
Analyte of interest
Standard
refelege
method
Minimum
detectipn
limit
Precision ` Accuracy`Comments
Inoranics SulfideP 90300 50 mg/Kg ±25% RPD t25% d
(con ?.)
Fluoride 300 1.0 mg/gg ±25% RPp t25%
Ammonium Am g 45D1426 0.5 mg/Rg #25% RPD t25%
d
8Unless otherwise specified, methods are from Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste ( SW-846)
(EPA 1986).
bAnalytical methods shall be in compliana with approved Westingho qga Hanford or We inghouse
Hanford -approved participant contractor or subcontractor procedures. All procedures shall be reviewed
a u a proved in roip ) lance with requirements specified to the Westinghouse Hanford QA program for
CPRCL^1 RI/FS activi^ies.
`Mimimum requirements for method detection levels precision, and accuracy will 4e method-
pTcific, and sha 1 be negotiated 4nd established in the procedure review and a prova s process. Target
va ues are indicated where appropriate; precision is expressed in terms of rela^ive percent different
(RPD) and accuracy as percentage recovery.
dAnalyses shall be performed by an approved participant contractor or subcontractor laboratory.
eHot a normally analyzed for constituent, therefore there are no established values.
(Highly dependant on operating conditions and plasma position.
gFrom Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Waste, EPA 600 /4-79-020 (EPA 1983x).
h Species dependant.
PPond water target analyte only.
0
m°m
c^
V1 1-
0 CO
7 00
H I

M
N
I Table E2-2. Investigative Procedures for 2101-M Pond Water and Near Surface Soil
2 Sampling.
Task 1: Task 2:
3 Procedure Titles Surface water Soil
sampling sampling
4 EII 1.2 Preparation and revision of environmental X X
investigation instructions
5 EII 1.4 Deviation from environmental investigation X X
instruction
6 EII 1.5 Field logbooks X X
7 EII 1.6 Records management X X
8 EII 1.7 Indoctrination, training and qualification X X
9 EII 2.1 Preparation of health and safety plans X X y
10 EII 3.1 User calibration of health and safety
measuring and test equipment ( M&TE)
X X
11 EII 5.0 Sample identification and entry into the X X
(HEIS) database
12 EII 5.1 Chain of custody X X
13 EII 5.2 Soil and sediment sampling X
14 EII 5.5 Decontamination of equipment for X X
RCRA/CERCLA sampling
15 EII 5.11 Sample packaging and shipping X X
16 'Procedures are EIIs selected from the latest approved version of WHC-CM-7-7
17 (WHC 1989a).
18
o
m m
ON
= CO
4.

l•
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 Goals for data representativeness are addressed qualitatively by the
2 specification of sampling locations and intervals within Appendix E-1 of the
3 closure plan. Objectives for completeness for this investigation shall
4 require that contractually or procedurally established requirements for
5 precision and accuracy be met for at least 90% of the total number of
6 requested determinations. Failure to meet this criterion shall be documented
7 in data summary reports as described in Section 8.1, and shall be considered
8 in the validation process discussed in Section 8.2. Corrective action
9 measures shall be initiated by the Technical Lead as appropriate, as noted in
10 Section 13.0. Approved analytical procedures shall require the use of the
11 reporting techniques and units consistent with the Environmental Protection
12 Agency (EPA) reference methods listed in Table E2-1 to facilitate the
13 comparability of data sets in terms of precision and accuracy.
14
15
16
17 4.0 SAMPLING PROCEDURES
18
19
20 The following sections provide information on procedure approvals and
21 controls, investigative procedures, and additions and changes to procedures.
22
23
24 4.1 PROCEDURE APPROVALS AND CONTROL
25
26 Procedure approvals and controls are discussed in the following sections.
27
28
29 4.1.1 Westinghouse Hanford Procedures
30
31 The Westinghouse Hanford procedures that will be used to support the
32 closure plan have been selected from the quality assurance program index
33 (QAPI) included in the Westinghouse Hanford, Environmental Engineering.
34 Technology and Permitting Function Quality Assurance Program Plan
35 (WHC-EP-0330). Selected procedures include Environmental investigation and
36 instructions (EIIs) from the Environmental Investigations and Site
37 Characterization Manual (WHC 1989a), and quality requirements (QR) and quality
38 instructions (QI) from the Westinghouse Hanford Quality Assurance Manual (WHC
39 1989b). Procedure approval, revision, and distribution control requirements
40 applicable to EIIs are addressed in EII 1.2, "Preparation and Revision of
41 Environmental Investigation Instructions" (WHC 1989a); requirements applicable
42 to QIs and QRs are addressed in QR 5.0, "Instructions, Procedures, and
43 Drawings"; QI 5.1, "Preparation of Quality Assurance Documents"; QR 6.0,
44 "Document Control"; and QI 6.1, "Quality Assurance Document Control" (WHC
45 1989b). Other procedures applicable to the preparation, review, and revision
46 of OSM and other Hanford analytical laboratory procedures shall be defined in
47 the various procedures and manuals identified in the Environmental
48 Engineering. Technology and Permitting Function Quality Assurance Program Plan
49 (WHC-EP-0383) under criteria 5.00 and 6.00. All procedures are available for
50 regulatory review on request at the direction of the Technical Lead.
51
APP E2-8

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
4.1.2 Participant Contractor/Subcontractor Procedures
As noted in Section 2.1, participant contractor and/or subcontractor
services may be procured at the direction of the Technical Lead. All such
procurements shall be subject to the applicable requirements of
QR 4.0, "Procurement Document Control"; QI 4.1, "Procurement Document
Control"; QI 4.2, "External Services Control"; QR 7.0, "Control of Purchased
Items and Services"; QI 7.1, "Procurement Planning and Control"; and/or
QI 7.2, "Supplier Evaluation" (WHC 1989b). Whenever such services require
procedural controls, requirements for use of Westinghouse Hanford procedures
or for submittal of contractor procedures for Westinghouse Hanford review and
approval before use, shall be included in the procurement document or work
order, as applicable. In addition to the submittal of analytical procedures,
analytical laboratories shall be required to submit the current version of
their internal QA program plans. Before use, all analytical laboratory plans
and procedures shall be reviewed and approved by qualified personnel from the
OSM, Westinghouse Hanford analytical laboratories organizations, or other
qualified personnel, as directed by the Technical Lead. All reviewers shall
be qualified under the requirements of EII 1.7, "Indoctrination, Training, and
Qualification" (WHC 1989a). All participant contractor or subcontractor
procedures, plans, and/or manuals shall be retained as project quality records
in compliance with EII 1.6, "Records Management" (WHC 1989a); QR 17.0,
"Quality Assurance Records"; and QI 17.1, "Quality Assurance Records Control"
(WHC 1989b). All such documents shall be available for regulatory review on
request, at the direction of the Technical Lead.
4.2 SAMPLING AND INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURES
All soil sampling activities shall be performed in compliance with
EII 5.2, "Soil and Sediment Sampling" (WHC 1989a). Additional EIIs that have
been selected to support this activity are identified in Table E2-2. Sample
identification requirements and containertype, preparation, and preservation
requirements shall be as specified in EII 5.11. Procedures to support data
interpretation shall be developed as modifications to EII 11.2, as contractor
procedures, or may be incorporated as addenda to this QAPP as necessary to
support the detailed requirements of the 2101-M Pond Closure Plan.
4.3 PROCEDURE ADDITIONS AND CHANGES
Additional EIIs or EII updates that may be required as a consequence
of closure plan requirements shall be developed in compliance with
EII 1.2, "Preparation and Revision of Environmental Investigations
Instructions" (WHC 1989x). Should deviations from established EIIs be
required to accommodate unforseen field situations, the field team leader can
authorize any such deviation in accordance with the requirements of
EII 1.4, "Deviation from Environmental Investigations Instructions"
(WHC 1989a). Documentation, review, and disposition of instruction change
authorization forms are defined within EII 1.4. Other types of document
APP E2-9

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 change requests shall be completed as required by the Westinghouse Hanford
2 procedures governing their preparation and revision.
3
4
5
6 5.0 SAMPLE CUSTODY
7
8
9 All samples obtained during the course of this investigation shall be
10 controlled as required by EII 5.1, "Chain of Custody" (WHC 1989) from the
11 point of origin to the analytical laboratory. Laboratory chain-of-custody
12 procedures shall be reviewed and approved as required by Westinghouse Hanford
13 procurement control procedures as noted in Section 4.1, and shall ensure the
14 maintenance of sample integrity and identification throughout the analytical
15 process. At the direction of the Technical Lead, requirements for return of
16 residual sample materials after completion of analysis shall be defined in
17 accordance with those procedures defined in the procurement documentation to
18 subcontractor or participant contractor laboratories. Chain-of-custody forms
19 shall be initiated for returned residual samples as required by the approved
20 procedures applicable within the participating laboratory. Results of
21 analyses shall be traceable to original samples through the unique code or
22 identifier specified in Section 4.0. All results of analyses shall be
23 controlled as permanent project quality records as required by QR 17.0,
24 "Quality Assurance Records" (WHC 1989b) and EII 1.6, "Records Management"
25 (WHC 1989a).
26
27
28
29 6.0 CALIBRATION PROCEDURES
30
31
32 Calibration of all Westinghouse Hanford measuring and test equipment,
33 whether in existing inventory or purchased for this investigation, shall be
34 controlled as required by QR 12.0, "Control of Measuring and Test Equipment";
35 QI 12.1, "Acquisition and Calibration of Portable Measuring and Test
36 Equipment"; QI 12.2, "Measuring and Test Equipment Calibration by User"
37 (WHC 1989b); and/or EII 3.1, "User Calibration of Health and Safety Measuring
38 and Test Equipment" (WHC 1989a). Routine operational checks for Westinghouse
39 Hanford field equipment shall be as defined within applicable EIIs or
40 procedures; similar information shall be provided in Westinghouse Hanford-
41 approved participant contractor or subcontractor procedures.
42
43 Calibration of Westinghouse Hanford, participant contractor, or
44 subcontractor laboratory analytical equipment shall be as defined by
45 applicable standard analytical methods, subject to Westinghouse Hanford review
46 and approval.-
47
APP E2-10

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
7.0 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Analytical methods or procedures based on the reference methods
identified in Table E2-1 and Section 3.0 shall be selected or developed and
approved before use in compliance with appropriate Westinghouse Hanford
procedure and/or procurement control requirements as noted in Section 4.1.
8.0 DATA REDUCTION, VALIDATION, AND REPORTING
The following sections contain information concerning data reporting,
data validation, and data review and management.
8.1 DATA REDUCTION AND DATA PACKAGE PREPARATION
All analytical laboratories shall be responsible for preparing a report
summarizing the results of analysis and for preparing a detailed data package
that includes all information necessary to perform data validation to the
extent indicated by the minimum requirements of Section 8.2. Data summary
report format and data package content shall be defined in procurement
documentation subject to Westinghouse Hanford review and approval as noted in
Section 4.1. At a minimum, laboratory data packages shall include the
following:
• Sample receipt and tracking documentation (including identification
of the organization and individuals performing the analysis, the
names and signatures of the responsible analysts, sample holding
time requirements, references to applicable chain-of-custody
procedures, and the dates of sample receipt, extraction, and
analysis)
• Instrument calibration documentation, including equipment type and
model, with continuing calibration data for the time period in which
the analysis was performed
• Quality control data, as appropriate for the methods used, including
matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate data, recovery percentages,
precision data, laboratory blank data, and identification of any
nonconformances that may have affected the laboratory's measurement
system during the time period in which the analysis was performed
• The analytical results or data deliverables, including reduced data,
reduction formulas or algorithms, and identification of data
outliers or deficiencies.
APP E2-11

M
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 Other supporting information, such as initial calibration data,
2 reconstructed ion chromatographs, spectrograms, traffic reports, and raw data,
3 need not be included in the submittal of individual data packages unless
4 specifically requested by the Technical Lead or the OSM. However, all sample
5 data shall be retained by the analytical laboratory and made available for
6 systems or program audit purposes upon request by Westinghouse Hanford,
7 U.S. Department of Energy-Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL), or regulatory
8 agency representatives (Section 10.0). Such data shall be retained by the
9 analytical laboratory through the duration of contractual statement of work,
10 at which point the data shall be turned over to Westinghouse Hanford for
11 archiving.
12
13 The completed data package shall be reviewed and approved by the
14 analytical laboratory's QA Manager before submittal to the OSM for validation
15 as discussed in Section 8.2. The requirements of this section shall be
16 included in procurement documentation or work orders, as appropriate, in
17 compliance with the standard Westinghouse Hanford procurement control
18 procedures referenced in Section 4.1.
19
20
21 8.2 VALIDATION
22
23 Validation of the completed data package shall be performed by
24 Westinghouse Hanford OSM personnel. Validation requirements shall be defined
25 within approved OSM data validation procedures, but at a minimum shall require
26 the following:
27
28 For organic analyses, validation reports shall be prepared documenting
29 validation of the following areas as recommended in Laboratory Data Validation
30 Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Organics Analyses (EPA 1988b):
31
32 • Data summary narrative
33
34 . Sample holding times
35
36 . Gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer tuning and mass calibration
37 requirements
38
39 . Continuing calibration requirements
40
41 . Method blank sample requirements
42
43 . Surrogate recovery requirements
44
45 . Matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate requirements
46
47 . Internal standards performance requirements
48
49 . Target compound identification requirements
50
APP E2-12

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
• Target compound quantitation requirements and reported detection
limits
• Any tentatively identified compounds, library search, assessment,
and quantitation requirements
• Overall data assessment requirements.
For inorganic analyses, validation reports shall be prepared documenting
validation of the following areas, as recommended in Laboratory Data
Validation Functional Guidelines for Evaluatin4 Inor q anics Analyses
(EPA 1988a):
• Data summary narrative
• Sample holding times
• Continuing calibration requirements
• Method blank sample requirements
• Interference check sample requirements
• Laboratory control sample requirements
• Duplicate sample analysis
• Matrix spike sample requirements
• Atomic absorption quality control requirements
• Inductively coupled plasma serial dilution requirements
• Overall data assessment requirements.
8.3 FINAL REVIEW AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
All validation reports and supporting analytical data packages shall be
subjected to a final technical review by a qualified reviewer at the direction
of the Technical Lead before submittal to regulatory agencies or inclusion in
reports or technical memoranda. All validation reports, data packages, and
review comments shall be retained as permanent project quality records in
compliance with EII 1.6, "Records Management" (WHC 1989a) and QA 17.0,
"Quality Assurance Records" (WHC 1989b).
APP E2-13

fdT
e_
tS^
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 9.0 INTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL
2
3
4 All analytical samples shall be subject to in-process quality control
5 measures in both the field and laboratory. Unless superseded by specific
6 directions provided in Appendix J of the closure plan, the following minimum
7 field quality control requirements apply. These requirements are adapted from
8 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste (SW-846) (EPA 1986), as modified by
9 the proposed rule changes included in the Federal Register, Volume 54, No. 13
10 (EPA 1989).
11
12 Duplicate samples--For each shift of sampling activity under an
13 individual sampling subtask, a minimum of 5% of the total collected
14 samples shall be duplicated. Field duplicate samples are samples
15 retrieved from the same sampling location using the same equipment
16 and sampling technique, but analyzed_ independently. Laboratory
17 duplicate samples are samples taken successively from the same bulb.
18 Duplicate samples are generally used to verify the repeatability or
19 reproducibility of the analytical data.
20
21 Split samples--At the Technical Lead's direction, field or field
22 duplicate samples may be split in the field and sent to an
23 alternative laboratory . as a performance audit of the primary
24 laboratory. Frequency shall meet the minimum schedule requirements
25 of Section 10.0.
26
27 Field/Equipment Blanks--A water blank consists of pure deionized,
28 distilled water whose chemical composition is known, drawn through
29 decontaminated sampling equipment and taken as a sample. Blanks are
30 used to verify the adequacy of sampling equipment decontamination
31 procedures and are used to check for possible contamination
32 originating with the sampling environment. Blanks will be run
33 before the initiation of sampling each day or if blank contamination
34 is suspected or detected.
35
36 The internal quality control checks performed by analytical laboratories'
37 laboratory analyses shall meet the following minimum requirements.
38
39 Matrix spiked and matrix spiked duplicate samples--Matrix spiked and
40 matrix spiked duplicate samples require the addition of a known
41 quantity of a representative analyte of interest to the sample as a
42 measure of recovery percentage. The spike shall be made in a
43 replicate of a field sample. Spike compound selection, quantities,
44 and concentrations shall be described in the laboratories analytical
45 procedures. One sample shall be spiked for each analytical batch,
46 or once every 20 samples, whichever is greater.
47
48 Quality control reference samples--A quality control reference
49 sample shall be prepared from an independent standard at a
50 concentration other than that used for calibration, but within the
51 calibration range. Reference samples are required as an independent
APP E2-14

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
check on analytical technique and methodology, and shall be run with
every analytical batch, or every 20 samples, whichever is greater.
Other requirements specific to laboratory analytical equipment
calibration are included in Section 6.0. The minimum requirements of this
section shall be invoked in procurement documents or work orders in compliance
with standard Westinghouse Hanford procedures as noted in Section 4.1.
10.0 PERFORMANCE AND SYSTEM AUDITS
Performance, system, and program audits are scheduled to begin early in
the execution of this closure plan and to continue through to completion.
Collectively, the audits address quality affecting activities that include,
but are not limited to measurement accuracy, intramural and extramural
analytical laboratory services, field activities, and data collection,
processing, validation, and management.
Performance audits of the accuracy of laboratory analyses are implemented
in accordance with Standard Operating Procedure EII 1.12 "Laboratory Analysis
Performance Audits." System audit requirements are implemented in accordance
with Standard Operating Procedure QI 10.4, "Surveillance" (WHC 1989b).
Surveillances will be performed regularly throughout the course of the closure
plan activities. Additional performance and system "surveillances" may be
scheduled as a consequence of corrective action requirements, or may be
performed upon request. All quality affecting activities are subject to
surveillance.
All aspects of closu
environmental restoration
requirements of WHC-CM-4accordance
with QR 18.0.
Scheduling"; and QI 18. -
Quality Audits" by audi,.
"Qualification of Quali-
re plan activities will also be evaluated as part of
program wide QA audits under the procedural
(WHC 1989b). Program audits shall be conducted in
Bits"; QI 18.1, "Audit Programming and
anning, Performing, Reporting, and Follow-up of
, alified in compliance with QI 2.5,
rance Program Audit Personnel" (WHC 1989b).
i PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
All measurement and testing equipment used in the field and laboratory
that directly affects the quality of the analytical data shall be subject to
preventive maintenance measures that ensure minimization of measurement system
downtime. Field equipment maintenance instructions shall be as defined by the
approved procedures governing their use. Laboratories shall be responsible
for performing or managing the maintenance of their analytical equipment;
maintenance requirements, spare parts lists, and instructions shall be
included in individual methods or in laboratory QA plans, subject to
APP E2-15

h
G.
1^ 4
N
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 Westinghouse Hanford review and approval. When samples are analyzed using EPA
2 reference methods, the requirements for preventive maintenance of laboratory
3 analytical equipment as defined by the reference method shall apply.
4
5
6
7 12.0 DATA ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES
8
9
10 Test data from this investigation will be assessed as required by
11 Appendix E-1, of this closure plan. Analytical data shall first be compiled
12 and summarized by the laboratory and validated in compliance with approved OSM
13 procedures meeting all minimum requirements of Section 8.0.
14
15
16
17 13.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION
18
19
20 Corrective action requests required as a result of surveillance reports,
21 nonconformance reports, or audit activity shall be documented and
22 dispositioned as required by QR 16.0, "Corrective Action"; QI 16.1,
23 "Trending/Trend Analysis"; and QI 16.2, Corrective Action Reporting,"
24 (WHC 1989b). Primary responsibilities for corrective action resolution are
25 assigned to the Technical Lead and the QA Coordinator. Other measurement
26 systems, procedures, or plan corrections that may be required as a result of
27 routine review processes shall be resolved as required-by governing procedures
28 or shall be referred to the Technical Lead for resolution. Copies of all
29 surveillance, nonconformance, audit, and corrective action documentation shall
30 be routed to the project QA records upon completion or closure.
31
32
33
34 14.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORTS
35
36
37 As previously stated in Sections 10.0 and 13.0, project activities shall
38 be assessed regularly by auditing and surveillance processes. Surveillance,
39 nonconformance, audit, and corrective action documentation shall be routed to
40 the project quality records upon completion or closure of the activity.
41 A report summarizing all audit, surveillance, and instruction change
42 authorization activity (see Section 4.4), as well as any associated corrective
43 actions, shall be prepared by the QA Coordinator at the completion of the
44 activity or annually beginning one year after approval of the closure plan,
45 whichever is sooner. The report(s) shall be submitted to the Technical Lead
46 for incorporation into the final report prepared at the end of the
47 investigation. The final report shall include an assessment of the overall
48 adequacy of the total measurement system with regard to the data quality
49 objectives of the investigation.
50
51
APP E2-16

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 15.0 REFERENCES
2
3
4 Ecology, EPA and DOE, 1989, Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent
5 Order, Washington State Department of Ecology, U.S. Environmental
6 Protection Agency, and U.S. Department of Energy, Olympia, Washington.
7
8 EPA, 1986, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes, SW-846, Third edition
9 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
10 Response, Washington, D.C.
11
12 EPA, 1987, Data 0uality Objectives for Remedial Response Activities:
13 Volume I. Development Process, EPA/540/6-87/003, Office of Emergency and
14 Remedial Response and Office of Waste Programs Enforcement,
15 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
16
c11 EPA, 1988a, Laboratory Data Validation Functional Guidelines for Evaluating
18 Inorganics Analyses Hazardous Site Evaluation Division,
19 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
20
` 21 EPA, 1988b, Laboratory Data Validation Functional Guidelines for Evaluating
C 24 Organics Analyses, Hazardous Site Evaluation Division, U.S. Environmental
23 Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
°24
25 EPA, 1989, "Hazardous Waste Management System; Testing and Monitoring
26 Activities" (Proposed Rule), Federal Register, Vol. 54, No. 13,
27 pp. 3212-3228.
-28
.29 WHC, 1989a, Environmental Investigations and Site Characterization Manual,
30 WHC-CM-7-7, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.
.11
32 WHC, 1989b, Westinghouse Hanford Company Ouality Assurance Manual, WHC-CM-4-2,
33 Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.
34
q 5 WHC, 1990, Environmental Engineering. Technology and Permitting Function
36 Ouality Assurance Program Plan, WHC-EP-0383, Westinghouse Hanford
37 Company, Richland, Washington.
APP E2-17

ON
rn
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1
2
3
4
5 This page intentionally left blank.
APP E2-18

n
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 APPENDIX F
2
3
4 EVALUATION OF COVER DESIGN
910313.1137
APP F—i

p..
910313.1137
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
This page intentionally left blank.
APP f-ii

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 CONTENTS
2
3
4 1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-1
5
6 2.0 SURFACE WATER EROSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-1
7
8 3.0 WIND EROSION EVALUATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-7
9
10 4:0 HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION OF LANDFILL PERFORMANCE . . . . . . . . . . F-15
11
12 5.0 COVER MATERIAL VOLUME ESTIMATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-32
13
14 6.0 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-32
15
16
17
18 LIST OF FIGURES
19
20
21 F-1 Average Annual Values of Rainfall-Erosivity Factor R . . . . . . . F-3
22
s°s 23 F-2 Nomograph for Determining Soil-Erodibility Factor K for
24 U.S. Mainland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-4
25
26 F-3 Soil Ridge Roughness Factor K From Actual Soil
27 Ridge Roughness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-11
28
29 F-4 Annual Wind Erosion Climatic 'C' Factor Map . . . . . . . . . . . F-12
30
31
32
33 LIST OF TABLES
—' 34
35
36 F-1 Values of the Factor LS for Specific Combinations of
37 Slope Length and Steepness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-5
38
39 F-2 Average Return Period and Existing Record for Various
40 Precipitation Amounts and Intensity During Specified
41 Time Periods at the Hanford Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-6
42
43 F-3 Soil Erodibility Index (I) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-9
44
45 F-4 Knoll Erodibility I Correction Factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-10
46
47 F-5 Guide for Converting Range Vegetation to Equivalent
48 Quantity of Flat Small Grain Residue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-13
49
50 F-6 Cover Material Volume/Area Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-32
910313.1445
APP F-iii

910313.1218
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
This page intentionally left blank.
APP F-iv

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 1.0 INTRODUCTION
2
3
4 The following sections evaluate the performance of the preliminary cover
5 design as required by WAC-173-303. The areas in which the cover is evaluated
6 are (1) surface water erosion, (2) wind erosion, (3) and landfill performance
7 (HELP model evaluation). These evaluations support the effectiveness of the
8 preliminary cover design.
9
10
11
12 2.0 SURFACE WATER EROSION
13
14
15 Water Erosion Potential--The erosion potential of the cover surface soil
16 because of precipitation events is evaluated using the U.S. Department of
17 Agriculture (USDA) Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE). The Universal Soil
18 Loss Equation consists of six quantifiable factors, as follows (EPA 1979):
r 19
20
21 A = RKLSCP
22
's 23
24 .where:
25
26 A = average soil loss (tons/acre/yr)
27 R = rainfall and run-off erosivity index
G, 28 K = soil erodibility factor
29 L = slope length factor
30 S = slope steepness factor
31 C = cover/management factor
- 32 P = practice factor.
33
34 For this preliminary design, McGee Ranch will be the assumed borrow site
35 for the topsoil layer. The following topsoil properties and cover design
36 details are used to evaluate A:
37
38 • Topsoil type: silt to silt loam
39
40 • Average percent organic matter: 0.23% (Routson 1973)
41
42 • Estimated percent clay: 6% (Routson 1973)
43
44 • Estimated percent silt: 85% (Last et al. 1987)
45
46 • Estimated percent sand: 9% (Last et al. 1987)
47
48 • Uniform percent cover slope: 3%
49
50 • Cover length (Maximum drainage length): 50 ft
51
52 • Cover vegetation: Thickspike and Siberian wheatgrasses.
910313.1137
APP F-1

LO
e,
cy
ig
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
Therefore:
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
R = 20, from Figure F-1 (EPA 1979)
K = 0.64, from Figure F-2 (EPA 1979)
LS - 0.24, from Table F-1 (EPA 1979)
C = 0.20 (Nyhan 1986)
P = 1.0 (Nyhan 1986)
A = (20)(0.64)(0.24)(0.20)(1.0) - 0.62 tons/acre per yr.
This is an acceptable erosion rate as the overall site erosion is recommended
to be limited to 2 tons/acre, which is a rate that does not significantly
increase cover maintenance (EPA 1982).
Sheet Erosion Potential of Cover --The cover design is evaluated also to
determine if the 3% topsoil slope can withstand overland or sheet flow with a
minimum of erosion. The 50-yr, 20-minute storm rainfall intensity of
1.6 in./hour (Table F-2) is assumed for the design storm (Stone et al. 1983).
The 50-yr storm was selected because it exceeds the minimum design life of the
cover. The 20-minute rainfall intensity of 1.6 in./hour was assumed because
that intensity did occur once in a 20-minute thunderstorm over the 37 yr that
data was recorded at the Hanford Meteorology Station (Stone et al. 1983). The
Ration 1 Method is used for determining design discharge for tributary areas
of 1 m or less (about 1.196 yd 2) (Nelson and Abt 1986). Unit width analysis
is used where area is expressed as slope length by unit width and where unit
width = 1 foot.
where:
Q = CiA
Q = Maximum design discharge (ft3/s)
C = Run-off coefficient (assuming C = 1.00 indicates
no infiltration or worst-case scenario)
i = Intensity of rainfall (in./h)
A = Area of tributary (acres).
A portion of the design is all that need to be evaluated. The portion
will be assumed to be a homogeneous watershed area. It will have a 3% slope
with a length and a width of roughly 55 ft. Because the entire cover section
cannot contribute to a single tributary, it is assumed that any tributary area
is square. This yields an area of 0.07 acres.
Therefore:
910313.1137
Q = (1 ft)(1.6 in/hr)(0.07 acres) = 0.11 ft3/s
APP F-2

t0
1-+
O
W
i-r
W
i-+
H
W
V
D
v
v
-n i
w
EPA, 1979
Sn
it
1 Figure F-1. Average Annual Values of Rainfall -Erosivity Factor R. (EPA 1979).
PS-90.138
D
A O
m m
rn r
0 ou
= CO
i-..p

0
C3
m
to D° 0
0
a•v
T
a
^ 40
c
LL
50
± 60
C
m
o.
10
20
30
7U
80
90
\ i /
90
\ 80
Jet
`°
/ 2 ^)%^..
70—^^^ / —
^. \ /
-
\. . ......... ........
40
30
Percent Sand
(0.10 - 2.0 mir \ * 15
100 I
PROCEDURE: With appropriate data, enter scale at left and
proceed to points representing the soil's /, sand (0.10-2:0 mm),
% organic matter, structure and permeabi li
ty, la that ence ,
Interpolate between plotted cu rves. The dolled line illustrates s211,
X70..
procedure for a soil having: silt + very fine sand 650%, sand 5%,
organic matter 2.8%, structure 2, permeability 4. Solution: K= 0.31.
0
.70
.60
50 Y 0
0
40 E
0
.30 a
N
.20 u' .70
10 60
0 .50
'1 -Very Fine Granular
2 Fine Granular
3 - Medium or Coarse Granular
4 Blocky, Platy, or Massive
'Soil Structure
Rating 1 2 3 4
.............. /r
/
/
/
r
♦ 6 5 4 3 2 1 'Permeability
/ , / / Rating
v /
/
^ 6 -Very Slow
r -- 5 - Slow
4 - Slow to Moderate
/ 3 - Moderate
/ - 2 - Moderate to Rapid
/ 1 - 11apid
PS-90-143
Figure F-2. Nomograph for Determining Soil-Erodibility Factor K for U.S. Mainland. (EPA 1979)
y ..40
0
LL .30
T
v .20
0
W
u) .10
0.
0
m m
N_ r
O 00
= 00
...a

CD
w
w
w
w
V
n
v
T I
cn
1 Table F-1. Values of the Factor LS for Specific Combinations
2 of Slope Length and Steepness.
Slope
Slope length (feet)
25 50 75 100 150 200 300 400 500 600 800 1,000
5 0.5 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.19 0.20
6 1 0.09 0.10 0.12 0.13 0.15 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.21 0.22 0.24 0.26
7 2 0.13 0.16 0.19 0.20 0.23 0.25 0.28 0.31 0.33 0.34 0.38 0.40
8 3 0.19 0.23 0.26 0.29 0.33 0.35 0.40 0.44 0.47 0.49 0.54 0.57
9 4 0.23 0.30 0.36 0.40 0.47 0.53 0.62 0.70 0.76 0.82 0.92 1.0
10 5 0.27 0.38 0.46 0.54 0.66 0.76 0.93 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.7
11
12
13
6
8
10
0.34
0.50
0.69
0.48
0.70
0.97
0.58
0.86
1.2
0.67
0.99
1.4
0.82
1.2
1.7
14 12 0.90 1.3 1.6 1.8 2.2 2.6 3.1 3.6 4.0 4.4 5.1 5.7
0.95
1.4
1.9
1.2
1.7
2.4
1.4
2.0
2.7
1.5
2.2
3.1
1.7
2.4
3.4
1.9
2.8
3.9
2.1
3.1
4.3 0
15 14 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.3 2.8 3.3 4.0 4:6 5.1 5.6 6.5 7.3 y
16 16 1.4 2.0 2.5 2.8 3.5 4.0 4.9 5.7 6.4 7.0 8.0 9.0 0 ib
17 18 1.7 2.4 3.0 3.4 4.2 4.9 6.0 6.9 7.7 8.4 9.7 11.0
18 20 2.0 2.9 3.5 4.1 5.0 5.8 7.1 8.2 9.1 10.0 12.0 13.0
19 25 3.0 4.2 5.1 5.9 7.2 8.3 10.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 17.0 19.0
20 30 4.0 5.6 6.9 8.0 9.7 11.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 23.0 25.0
21 40 6.3 9.0 11.0 13.0 16.0 18.0 22.0 25.0 28.0 31.0 -- --
22 50 8.9 13.0 15.0 18.0 22.0 25.0 -- -- -- -- -- --
23 60 12.0 16.0 20.0 23.0 28.0
24 NOTE: Values given for slopes longer than 300 ft or steeper than 18% are extrapolations
25 beyond the range of the research data and, therefore, are less certain than the others
26 (EPA 1979).
27
zo
CD M

CD
CD
W
w
w
V
a
T
I
Cn
1 Table f-2. Average Return Period and Existing Record for Various Precipitation
2 Amounts and Intensity During Specified Time Periods at the Hanford Site
3 (based on extreme value analysis of 1947 through 1969 records).
4 Average Time period (amount in inches) Time period (intensity in inches per hour)
5
6
return
period Minutes Hours Minutes Hours
7 years 20 60 2 3 6 12 24" 20 60 2 3 6 12 24
8 2 0.16 0.26 0.30 0.36 0.48 0.62 0.72 0.49 0.26 0.15 0.12 0.08 0.052 0.030
9 5 0.24 0.40 0.48 0.55 0.77 0.95 1.06. 0.72 0.40 0.24 0.18 0.13 0.079 0.044
10 10 0.37 0.50 0.59 0.67 0.96 1.17 1.28 1.1 0.50 0.30 0.22 0.16 0.098 0.053
11 25 0.47 0.62 0.74 0.83 1.21 1.45 1.56 1.4 0.62 0.37 0.28 0.20 0.121 0.065
12 50 0.53 0.72 0.85 0.96 1.40 1.66 1.77 1.6 0.72 0.42 0.32 0.23 0.138 0.074
13 100 0.60 0.81 0.96 1.07 1.59 1.87 1.99 1.8 0.81 0.48 0.36 0.27 0.156 0.083
14 250 0.68 0.93 1.11 1.22 1.82 2.13 2.26 2.0 0.93 0.55 0.41 0.30 0.177 0.094
15 500 0.73 1.02 1.22 1.33 2.00 2.34 2.47 2.2 1.02 0.61 0.44 0.33 0.195 0.103
16 1,000 0.80 1.11 1.33 1.45 2.20 2.55 2.68 2.4 1.11 0.67 0.48 0.37 0.212 0.122
17 Existinq
a
0.59 0.88 1.08 1.68 1.88 1.91 ° 0.59 0.44 0.36 0.28 0.157 0.080
18 record
19 Month/day 6/12 10/1 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 6/12 10/1 10/1 10.5 10.5 10.5
20 Year -- 1969 1957 1957 1957 1957 1957 -- 1969 1959 1959 1959 1959 1959
21
22 NOTE: Records for 1947 through 1969 are from Stone et al. (1983).
23 'No records have been kept for time periods of less than 60 min. However, the rain gage
24 chart for 6-12/69 shows the 0.55 in occurred during a 20-min period from 6:35 p.m., Pacific
25 Standard Time. An additional 0.04 in occurred between 6:55 p.m. and 7:10 p.m., Pacific Standard
26 Time, to account for the record 60-minute amount of 0.59 inch.
27
9
0
zo
CD m
fn r
o eo
= OD
I

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 In order to do unit analysis, the depth of flow for this discharge must
2 be determined. Flow depth is calculated as follows:
3
4
5
6
7
8 where:
9
y - [Qn/(1.486)(S0.5)]0.6
10 y = depth of flow (ft)
11 Q - maximum design discharge (ft 3/second) (from previous equation)
12 n - manning roughness coefficient (where n - 0.02
13 for silt loam (Nelson and Abt 1986))
14
15
S = cover slope (percent).
16 Therefore:
17
M18
19
20
r.. 21
y = [(0.11 cfs)(0.020)/(1.486)(0.03)0.50.6 = 0.06 ft.
22 The velocity can now be determined for a unit area (one flow depth deep,
23 and one foot in width).
24
-'25
26
27
my 28
"29 where:
-,130
V = Q/A
31 V = design flow velocity (ft/s)
_.32 Q = maximum design discharge (ft3/s)
33
--34
35
A = y (area of flow).
x'36
37
38
V - (0.11 cfs)/(1 ft)(0.06 ft) 1.83 ft/s.
39 Allowable V for silt loam is 3 ft/second (Nelson and Abt 1986).
40 Therefore, sheet erosion potential of the cover materials is not a problem.
41
42
43
44
45
46
3.0 WIND EROSION EVALUATION
47 To evaluate the wind erosion potential of the cover surface soil, the
48 Wind Erosion Equation (WEQ) was developed by the USDA Agricultural Research
910313.1131
APP F-7

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Service (ARS). It has been modified for use in the state of Washington by the
Soil Conservation Service (USDA 1987). The equation is used to evaluate the
potential for wind erosion of soil surfaces and is used as follows:
where:
E = f(IKCLV)
E = the estimated average annual soil loss in tons/acre/yr due to wind
erosion
f - an indication that the equation includes functional relationships
that are not straight-line mathematical functions
I = soil erodibility factor
K = ridge roughness factor
C = climatic factor
L = unsheltered distance
V = vegetative factor.
The equation can be considered to be successive modifications to I. The
I factor is the potential annual wind erosion in tons/acre/yr for a given soil
on an isolated, level, smooth, unsheltered, wide, and bare field with a
noncrusted surface where the climatic factor is 100 percent.
The I factor is dependent on the soil texture and the percentage of dry
aggregates over 0.84 mm in size. From DOE 1990, this value is roughly 3% for
McGee Ranch Silt. To evaluate a soil in a realistic manner entails
determining the normal, natural occurring state of the soil after exposure to
the elements. McGee Ranch soils normally exhibits a crusted surface
condition, for which the I value in Table F-3 is 36.7. It is expected that
the topsoil layer will form a crusted surface relatively soon after
construction, in response to rain and snowfall events during the winter of the
first year. If necessary, the formation of a crusted surface may be
accelerated by direct application of water.
910313.1423
This I value must be adjusted for the portion of the cover that will be
sloped and facing the prevailing winds. This is applied where an unsheltered
distance of 500 ft or less exists as is the case with the 2101-M Pond cover.
With a cover slope of 3%, the adjustment factor from Table F-4 is 1.3,
therefore;
I = (36.7)(1.3) = 48 tons/acre/yr
The ridge roughness factor's (K) primary use is in application to
agricultural related activities that take place on a recurring basis (e.g.,
plowing, planting, discing, harrowing, etc.). Ridges may be created at
planting time, but these will exist for only a short period of time. This
assumes that the seed is planted using a drill as opposed to planting by
broadcast seeding methods. Assuming a ridge height of 1 in. after seeding,
APP F-8

0w
w
w
V
a
v
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
T i 15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
0 0
10 22.3
20 16.3
30 12.3
40 9.3
50 6.3
60 3.5
70 2.0
80 0.3
Israelsen et al. 1980.
! 3 ;^z
P
Table F-3. Soil Erodibility Index
Percent of dry soil
not passing a 20 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
mesh screen
(Units) Noncrusted soil surface (tons /acre)
0 0 310 250 220 195 180 170 160 150 . 140
10 134 131 128 125 121 117 113 109 106 102
20 98 95 92 90 88 86 83 81 79 76
30 64 72 71 69 67 65 63 62 60 58
40 56 54 52 51 50 48 47 45 43 41
50 38 36 33 31 29 27 25 24 23 22
60 21 20 19 18 17 16 16 15 14 13
70 12 11 10 8 76 6 4 3 3 2
80 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fully crusted soil surface (tons/acre)
51.7 41.7 36.7 32.5 30.0 28.7 26.7 25.0 23.3
21.8 21.3 20.8 20.2 19.5 18.8 18.2 17.7 17.0
15.8 15.3 15.0 14.7 14.3 13.8 13.5 13.2 12.7
12.0 11.8 11.5 11.2 10.8 10.5 10.3 10.0 9.7
9.0 8.7 8.5 8.3 8.0 7.8 7.5 7.2 6.8
6.0 5.5 5.2 4.8 4.5 4.2 4.0 3.8 3.7
3.3 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.2
1.8 1.7 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
m m

10
A
10 10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
910314.0921
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Table F-4. Knoll Erodibility I Correction Factor.
Knoll facing wind
rise in percent slope (along
prevailing wind erosion direction)
I slope
correction
3 1.3
K factor of 0.6 is obtained from Figure F-3. This ridge height can only be
assumed for the first year of the cover's life because the 2101-M Pond cover
will not be subjected to annual tillage activities to develop and maintain
soil ridges. The K factor will have little or no influence on the cover
design after this first year. Therefore, the ridge height is assumed to be
zero over long periods of time. From Figure F-3, the K value is then 1.
The distribution of climatic factor (C) across Washington State is
indicated in Figure F-4. Appropriate ranges for the C factor is 60 to 70 for
the 2101-M Pond area.
The vegetative factor (V) is difficult to characterize. During the first
year after cover construction, before a mature stand of cover vegetation has
been produced, the soil surface will be protected from wind erosion by
spreading and crimping 4,000 lbs of straw per acre on or into the soil
surface. For following years, the amount of plant production for the site
must be estimated. The USDA Soil Conservation Service has performed a number
of evaluations of range site conditions for varying soil and precipitation
conditions. The average annual rainfall for this area is in the
6- to 9-in. range. Using the data from similar climate and land use areas,
the total annual production of air-dry weight per acre for the 2101-M Pond
vegetative cover runs from a low of 200 lbs for unfavorable years, to 500 lbs
for favorable years (USDA 1981). The design assumes the median value for V.
This yields 350 lbs of air-dry material. Using Crested Wheatgrass from
Table F-5 to represent the cover vegetation, the flat small grain equivalent
is roughly 1,100 lbs/acre. The unsheltered field length (L) for the worst
case condition on the cover is 50 ft.
APP F-10
1.6
1.9
2.3
3.0
3.6

1
F
`o
1.0
0.9
0.8
LL
N
C
O)
0
0.7
O
Q
NO)
'O
¢ 0.6
O
rn
0.5
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
we 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Soil Ridge Roughness (inches)
Figure F-3. Soil Ridge Roughness Factor K From
Y^ Actual Soil Ridge Roughness (EPA 1979).
APP F-11
H9008006.6

CD
0
to
N
a
v
IV
10
Washington
—1
20
30
Figure F-4. Annual Wind _Erosion Climatic `C' Factor Map.
79909079.1
O
;0O
mm
H r
0 CO
:3 00
H ?

0
w
w
w
V
aM
v
T I
w
1 Table F-5. Guide for Converting Range Vegetation to Equivalent Quantity
2 of Flat Small Grain Residue. (sheet 1 of 2)
3 Grass plants
4 Buffalograss', burro- 320 720 1,630 2,630
5 grass, and Inland
6 saltgrass
Pounds per acre of range vegetation
50 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000
7 Big bluesteme 45 110 280 480 705 950 1,215 1,495 1,785 2,090 2,410
8 Western wheatgrass', 155 245 775 1,240 1,740 2,260 2,795 3,345
9 creeping wildrye,
10 and side oats grama
11 Little Bluestem' 45 110 285 495 735 995 1,280 1,580 1,900 2,230 2,575
12 Blue grama', 110 235 490 760 1,040 1,325 1,610 1,905
13 threadleaf sedge,
14 and perennial
15 three-awn
16 Galleta and tobosa 150 300 800 1,200 1,700 2,600
17 Bottlebrush 70 150 300 600 800 1,200
18 squirreltail,
19 needle and thread',
20 and thruber
21 needlegrass
22 Alkali sacaton 60 150 400 800 1,400 2,200 2,800 3,600
23 Bluebunch wheatgrass 50 120 300 550 850 1,150 1,500 1,900 2,300 2,600 3,000
24 Idaho fescue 100 200 400 900 1,500 2,300
25
0
zo
m m
N Imo"
O CO ao
I

0w
w
r+
N
.A
1
2
3 Grass plants
Table F-5. Guide for Converting
^P Gig+ cM^ii r_.. in
Vegetation to Equivalent Quantity
e. (sheet 2 of 2)
Pounds per acre of range vegetation
50 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000
4 Indian ricegrass 100 175 300 600 900 1,400
5 Crested wheatgrass 130 300 600 900 1,300 1,800 2,400 3,100 4,000
6 Cheatgrass 100 200 300 600 800 1,000 1,200 2,000 2,500 3,000
7 NOTE: Other grass species equivalents were estimated by comparing the growth characteristics
8 with the tested species.
9 'Lyles and Allison (1980).
10
a M
v
m
T
zo0
Hr
0 00
3 co
N

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
X18
19
20
,21
22
. 23
24
" 25
26
27
28
29
n p 30
31
w 32
33
°- 34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
910313.1137
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
With the given information: I= 48, K=0.6 for the first year and then
1.0 for the life of the cover; C= 60 to 70, L=50, and V=4,000 for the first
year and then 1,100 for following years; the value of E can be determined from
interpolation of SCS wind erosion charts for these values.
Wind erosion for the first year is estimated to be essentially zero.
This is primarily attributed to the projected effectiveness of the straw mulch
treatment. In following years, wind erosion will be determined by the
condition of the grass stand. In the years following the initial seeding,
when an average stand is present, wind erosion is predicted to be less than
0.5 tons/acre/yr. It is assumed also that the straw mulch will continue to
assist in reducing wind erosion for two to three years after placement. This
will be dependent upon the climatic conditions during that time span.
In those years when a less-than-average stand of grass develops (200 lbs
air-dry weight/acre), the estimated V will drop to roughly 600 lbs/acre. This
will yield a predicted erosion rate of 0.7 ton/acre/yr (C=60) to
1.0 ton/acre/yr (C=70). As is demonstrated by these results, the projected
soil losses are highly dependent on the vegetative factor. In those years
when the vegetation yield is above the predicted average, the erosion rate
will be insignificant. Until the vegetative cover becomes fully established,
the erosion rates may exceed the estimated average range. After establishment
of the vegetative cover, the erosion rates should more closely coincide with
the predicted rates. An increase in the vegetative growth to around optimal
production (500 lbs air-dry weight per acre) would decrease soil losses to
zero.
4.0 HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION OF LANDFILL PERFORMANCE
The Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) computer
modelling results are included in this appendix. The HELP model was developed
by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to aid hazardous waste
landfill designers in estimating water budget and quantity of leachate from a
landfill. Therefore, the model is used as a tool to estimate water drainage
and percolation through covers and/or liner and leachate collection systems
for landfills. The model uses a deterministic, sequential daily analysis to
calculate run-off, evapotranspiration, percolation, and lateral drainage. The
following discussion is based on the documentation of the HELP Model,
Version 2.0 (EPA 1984). The newest existing released version of the HELP
model will be used during definitive design.
The HELP model requires the use of specific cover-soil physical
properties and local climatological data. The HELP model is provided with
climatological data for many locations across the United States. Local
climatological data available from the Hanford Meteorological Station were
input to the HELP model where available (Skelly 1990).
APP F-15

NZ
e ,.
A.a
a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
910313.1137
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
The model is set up to run four different kinds of layers, only one of
which is used for this design. The four types of layers are: (1) vertical
percolation, (2) lateral drainage, (3) barrier or low-permeability components,
and (4) waste layer. For the model, only the vertical drainage layer was used
as a cover component as opposed to the low-permeability component to build
some conservatism into the evaluation. The vertical layers work on the
principle that there is no significant resistance to vertical flow. Water can
move up or down to account for evapotranspiration as well as percolation. No
lateral drainage is assumed for vertical drainage components.
The model calculates water movement off of the cover surface and through
the cover on a daily basis. The model handles precipitation as subdivided
into components including runoff, evapotranspiration, percolation, and
subsurface lateral drainage.
Surface run-off is that component of precipitation that does not
infiltrate the soil. Once the infiltration requirements are fulfilled, water
begins to be stored in natural surface depressions and flows through small
channels in the cover surface. A Soil Conservation Service curve number is
assigned to the soil and is coupled with a Darcian flow equation modified for
unsaturated flow conditions.
Infiltration has been calculated based on the differences between daily
precipitation and the sum of the change in surface storage of precipitation,
the daily run-off, and surface evaporation. If the mean daily temperature is
below 32 °F, the precipitation would be stored as snow.
Evapotranspiration has been modelled as a function of available energy,,
vegetation, soil, water transmissivity, and water content. For the
evapotranspiration function, available surface water is first addressed and
then subsurface water is used to separately calculate plant transpiration and
evaporation on a daily basis.
The model assumes that each layer is homogeneous with respect to
hydraulic conductivity, porosity, and field capacity.
The products of the model runs are summaries of annual totals, average
annual total for 5 yr, and peak daily totals for precipitation, run-off,
evapotranspiration, and percolation from base of cover. The following summary
data is provided.
APP F-16

t
rs
1
2
3
4
2101-M Pond
Steady State Output
7/16/90
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
5 Layer1
6 Vertical Percolation Layer
7 Thickness = 30.00 In.
8 Porosity = 0.5140 Vol/Vol
9 Field Capacity a 0.2585 Vol/Vol
10 Wilting Point s 0.0681 Vol/Vol
11 Initial Soil Water Content . 0.0899 Vol/Vol
12 Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity = 0.001000000047 Cm/Sec
13 Laver 2
14 Vertical Percolation Layer
15 Thickness = 12.00 In.
16 Porosity = 0.3470 Vol/Vol
17 Field Capacity = 0.2585 Vol/Vol
18 Wilting Point a 0.0681 Vol/Vol
19 Initial Soil Water Content = 0.0925 Vol/Vol
20 Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity = 0.000000300000 Cm/Sec
- 21 Layer
22 Vertical Percolation Layer
23 Thickness = 12.00 In.
24 Porosity = 0.4370 Vol/Vol
25 Field Capacity = 0.1050 Vol/Vol
26 Wilting Point = 0.0470 Vol/Vol
27 Initial Soil Water Content = 0.1114 Vol/Vol
28 Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity = 0.002700000070 Cm/Sec
29
910313.1137
APP F-17

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
910313.1137
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
General Simulation Data
SCS Runoff Curve Number 3 80.00
Total Area of Cover = 27600. Sq. Ft
Evaporative Zone Depth 36.00 In.
Upper Limit Veg. Storage 17.5020 In.
Initial Veg. Storage = 3.2520 In.
Initial Snow Water Content = 0.0000 In.
Initial Total Water Storage in
Soil and Waste Layers s 5.1438 In.
Soil Water Content Initialized by User.
Climatological Data
User Specified Rainfall with Synthetic Daily Temperatures and
Solar Radiation for Hanford Wash
Maximum Leaf Area Index s 1.60
Start of Growing Season (Julian Date) = 113
End of Growing Season (Julian Date) 288
Normal Mean Monthly Temperatures, Degrees Fahrenheit
Jan/Jul Feb/Aug Mar/Sep Apr/Oct May/Nov Jun/Dec
29.30 36.30 45.10 53.10 61.50 69.30
76.40 74.30 65.20 53.00 39.80 32.70
APP F-18

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
CV 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
°16
^17
18
19
20
21
22
23
910313.1137
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision"1
Monthly Totals for Year 1979
Jan/Jul Feb/Aug Mar/Sep Apr/Oct
Precipitation (in.) 0.54 0.17 0.54 0.52
0.09 0.38 0.20 0.67
Run-off (in.) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Evapotranspiration 0.778 0.324 0.206 0.447
(in.) 0.090 0.280 0.300 0.137
Percolation From 0.0030 0.0026 0.0028 0.0027
Layer 3 (in.) 0.0026 0.0025 0.0024 0.0024
Annual Totals for Year 1979
May/Nov Jun/Dec
0.10 0.00
1.43 0.99
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.606 0.309
0.349 0.531
0.0027 0.0026
0.0023 0.0023
(Inches) (Cubic Feet) Percent
Precipitation 5.63 12949. 100.00
Run-off 0.000 0. 0.00
Evapotranspiration 4.357 10021. 77.39
Percolation from Layer 3 0.0309 71. 0.55
Change in Water Storage 1.242 2856. 22.06
Soil Water at Start of Year 5.14 11831.
Soil Water at End of Year 6.39 14687.
Snow Water at Start of Year 0.00 0.
Snow Water at End of Year 0.00 0.
Annual Water Budget Balance 0.00 0. 0.00
APP F-19

1
2
3
2
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
910313.1137
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Monthly Totals for Year 1980
Jan/Jul Feb/Aug Mar/Sep Apr/Oct May/Nov Jun/Dec
Precipitation (in.) 1.32 1.30 0.30 0.86 1.43 0.96
0.00 0.02 0.85 0.33 0.44 1.89
Run-off (in.) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Evapotranspiration 0.487 1.187 1.937 0.663 1.678 2.076
(in.) 0.215 0.020 0.379 0.362 0.291 0.324
Percolation from 0.0023 0.0021 0.0022 0.0021 0.0021 0.0020
Layer 3 (in.) 0.0020 0.0020 0.0019 0.0019 0.0018 0.0019
Annual Totals for Year 1980
(Inches) (Cubic Feet) Percent
Precipitation 9.70 22310. 100.00
Run-off 0.000 0. 0.00
Evapotranspiration 9.619 22124. 99.17
Percolation from Layer 3 0.0244 56. 0.25
Change in Water Storage 0.057 130. 0.58
Soil Water at Start of Year 6.39 14687.
Soil Water at End of Year 6.44 14817.
Snow Water at Start of Year 0.00 0.
Snow Water at End of Year 0.00 0.
Annual Water Budget Balance 0.00 0. 0.00
APP F-20

^r
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 Monthly Totals for Year 1981
2 Jan/Jul Feb/Aug Mar/Sep Apr/Oct May/Nov Jun/Dec
3 Precipitation 0.56 0.60 0.70 0.02 0.99 0.43
4 (in.) 0.19 0.03 0.60 0.39 1.08 1.45
5 Run-off (in.) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
6 Evapotranspiration 0.696 1.502 1.071 0.431 0.367 1.395
7 (in.) 0.181 0.030 0.098 0.334 0.537 0.558
8 Percolation from 0.0018 0.0016 0.0018 0.0017 0.0017 0.0016
9 Layer 3 (in.) 0.0017 0.0017 0.0016 0.0016 0.0015 0.0016
10
11
12 Annual Totals for Year 1981
13 (Inches) (Cubic Feet) Percent
r, 14 Precipitation 7.04 16192. 100.00
.15 Run-off 0.000 0. 0.00
" 1 16 Evapotranspiration 7.202 16565. 102.30
17 Percolation from Layer 3 0.0199 46. 0.28
18 Change in Water Storage -0.182 -419. -2.59
19 Soil Water at Start of Year 6.44 14817.
20 Soil Water at End of Year 6.26 14399.
21 Snow Water at Start of Year 0.00 0.
22 Snow Water at End of Year 0.00 0.
23 Annual Water Budget Balance 0.00 0. 0.00
24
910313.1137
APP F-21

LO
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 Monthly Totals for Year 1982
2 Jan/Jul Feb/Aug Mar/Sep Apr/Oct May/Nov Jun/Dec
3 Precipitation 0.38 0.57 0.30 0.75 0.28 0.75
4 (in.) 0.22 0.20 0.55 1.37 0.91 1.79
5 Run-off (in.) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
6 Evapotranspiration 0.692 1.161 1.038 0.583 0.709 0.342
7 (in.) 0.717 0.195 0.291 0.399 1.038 0.569
8 Percolation from 0.0015 0.0014 0.0015 0.0014 0.0015 0.0014
9 Layer 3 (in.) 0.0014 0.0014 0.0013 0.0014 0.0013 0.0013
10
11
12 Annual Totals for Year 1982
13 (Inches) (Cubic Feet) Percent
,. 14 Precipitation 8.07 18561. 100.00
15 Run-off 0.000 0. 0.00
-` 16 Evapotranspiration 7.735 17791. 95.85
17 Percolation from Layer 3 0.0168 39. 0.21
18 Change in Water Storage 0.318 731. 3.94
19 Soil Water at Start of Year 6.26 14399.
20 Soil Water at End of Year 6.58 15130.
21 Snow Water.at Start of Year 0.00 0.
22 Snow Water at End of Year 0.00 0.
23 Annual Water Budget Balance 0.00 0. 0.00
24
910313.1331
APP F-22

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 Monthly Totals for Year 1983
2 Jan/Jul Feb/Aug Mar/Sep Apr/Oct May/Nov Jun/Dec
3 Precipitation 1.44
4 (in.) 0.31
5 Run-off (in.) 0.000
0.000
6 Evapotranspiration 0.597
7 (in.) 0.680
8 Percolation from 0.0013
9 Layer 3 (in.) 0.0012
10
11
1.36 1.00 0.42 0.52 0.68
0.12 0.46 0.52 2.12 2.12
f" 12 Annual Totals for Year 1983
rr 13
14 Precipitation
_ 15 Run-off
r?^
°16 Evapotranspiration
17 Percolation from Layer 3
18 Change in Water Storage
19 Soil Water at Start of Year
20 Soil Water at End of Year
21 Snow Water at Start of Year
22 Snow Water at End of Year
23 Annual Water Buget Balance
24
910313.1137
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1.000 2.188 0.863 0.706 2.009
0.132 0.452 0.165 0.700 0.459
0.0012 0.0013 0.0012 0.0013 0.0012
0.0012 0.0012 0.0012 0.0011 0.0012
(Inches) (Cubic Feet) Percent
APP F-23
11.07 25461. 100.00
0.000 0. 0.00
9.951 22887. 89.89
0.0145 33. 0.13
1.105 2541. 9.98
6.58 15130.
7.68 17671.
0.00 0.
0.00 0.
0.00 0. 0.00

-,s
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
910313.1206
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Monthly Totals for Year 1984
Jan/Jul Feb/Aug Mar/Sep Apr/Oct May/Nov Jun/Dec
Precipitation 0.23 0.94 1.01 0.60 0.55 0.99
(in.) 0.06 0.00 0.42 0.07 1.83 0.57
Run-off (in.) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Evapotranspiration 0.463 1.325 2.024 0.624 0.748 2.403
(in.) 0.235 0.000 0.217 0.268 0.468 0.595
Percolation from 0.0011 0.0011 0.0011 0.0011 0.0011 0.0011
Layer 3 (in.) 0.0011 0.0011 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010
Precipitation
Run-off
Evapotranspiration
Percolation from Layer 3
Change in Water Storage
Soil Water at Start of Year
Soil Water at End of Year
Snow Water at Start of Year
Snow Water at End of Year
Annual Water Budget Balance
Annual Totals for Year 1984
APP F-24
(Inches) (Cubic Feet) Percent
7.27 16721. 100.00
0.000 0. 0.00
9.369 21548. 128.87
0.0128 29. 0.18
-2.112 -4857. -29.05
7.68 17671.
5.57 12814.
0.00 0.
0.00 0.
0.00 0. 0.00

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 Monthly Totals for Year 1985
2 Jan/Jul Feb/Aug Mar/Sep Apr/Oct May/Nov Jun/Dec
3 Precipitation 0.34 0.82 0.36 0.01 0.12 0.15
4 (in.) 0.12 0.01 0.63 0.46 1.24 0.86
5 Run-off (in.) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
6 Evapotranspiration 0.673 1.205 0.933 0.050 0.130 0.150
7 (in.) 0.027 0.103 0.339 0.263 0.279 0.632
8 Percolation from 0.0010 0.0009 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0009
9 Layer 3 (in.) 0.0010 0.0010 0.0009 0.0009 0.0009 0.0009
10
11
12 Annual Totals for Year 1985
13 (Inches) (Cubic Feet) Percent
14 Precipitation 5.12 11776. 100.00
15 Run-off 0.000 0. 0.00
"4 16 Evapotranspiration 4.785 11006. 93.46
17 Percolation from Layer 3 0.0114 26. 0.22
18 Change in Water Storage 0.323 744. 6.32
19 Soil Water at Start of Year 5.57 12814.
20 Soil Water at End of Year 5.89 13558.
21 Snow Water at Start of Year 0.00 0.
22 Snow Water at End of Year 0.00 0.
23 Annual Water Budget Balance 0.00 0. 0.00
24
910313.1137
APP F-25

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 Monthly Totals for Year 1986
2 Jan/Jul Feb/Aug Mar/Sep Apr/Oct May/Nov Jun/Dec
3 Precipitation 1.76 1.21 0.76 0.00 0.30 0.00
4 (in.) 0.21 0.02 0.96 0.29 0.65 0.77
5 Run-off (in.) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
6 Evapotranspiration 0.542 1.381 1.746 0.443 0.367 0.457
7 (in.) 0.981 0.020 0.320 0.265 0.234 0.272
8 Percolation from 0.0009 0.0008 0.0009 0.0009 0.0009 0.0008
CV% 9 Layer 3 (in.) 0.0009 0.0009 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008
10
11
12 Annual Totals for Year 1986
13 (Inches) (Cubic Feet) Percent
14 Precipitation 6.93 15939. 100.00
-- 15 Run-off 0.000 0. 0.00
16 Evapotranspiration 7.028 16164. 101.41
17 Percolation from Layer 3 0.0102 24. 0.15
18 Change in Water Storage -0.108 -249. -1.56
19 Soil-Water at Start of Year 5.89 13558.
20 Soil Water at End of Year 5.79 13309.
21 Snow Water at Start of Year 0.00 0.
22 Snow Water at End of Year 0.00 0.
23 Annual Water Budget Balance 0.00 0. 0.00
24
910313.1332
APP F-26

c.^
r^
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 Monthly Totals for Year 1987
2 Jan/Jul Feb/Aug Mar/Sep Apr/Oct May/Nov Jun/Dec
3 Precipitation 0.80 0.55 1.05 0.14 0.39 0.08
4 (in.) 0.50 0.07 0.01 0.00 0.40 1.63
5 Run-off (in.) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
6 Evapotranspiration 0.274 1.025 1.593 0.643 0.671 0.383
7 (in.) 0.500 0.070 0.010 0.000 0.234 0.231
8 Percolation from 0.0008 0.0007 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008
9 Layer 3 (in.) 0.0008 0.0008 0.0007 0.0008 0.0007 0.0008
10
11
12 Annual Totals for Year 1987
13 (Inches) (Cubic Feet) Percent
14 Precipitation 5.62 12926. 100.00
. 15 Run-off 0.000 0. 0.00
16 Evapotranspiration 5.634 12958. 100.25
17 Percolation from Layer 3 0.0093 21. 0.17
18 Change in Water Storage -0.023 -53. -0.41
19 Soil Water at Start of Year 5.79 13309.
20 Soil Water at End of Year 5.76 13256.
21 Snow Water at Start of Year 0.00 0.
22 Snow Water at End of Year 0.00 0.
23 Annual Water Budget Balance 0.00 0. 0.00
24
910313.1207
APP F-27

DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 Monthly Totals For Year 1988
2 Jan/Jul Feb/Aug Mar/Sep Apr/Oct May/Nov Jun/Dec
3 Precipitation 0.48 0.00 0.60 1.12 0.33 0.11
4 (in.) 0.13 0.00 0.39 0.01 0.82 0.40
5 Run-off (in.) .0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
6 Evapotranspiration 0.254 0.165 0.279 1.040 1.410 1.057
7 (in.) 0.130 0.000 0.190 0.210 0.303 0.297
8 Percolation from 0.0008 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007
9 Layer 3 (in.) 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007
10
11
12 Annual Totals for Year 1988
13 (Inches) (Cubic Feet) Percent
14 Precipitation 4.39 10097. 100.00
15 Run-off 0.000 0. 0.00
16 Evapotranspiration 5.335 12270. 121.52
17 Percolation from Layer 3 0.0085 20. 0.19
18 Change in Water Storage -0.953 -2193. -21.72
19 Soil Water at Start of Year 5.76 13256.
20 Soil Water at End of Year 4.81 11064.
21 Snow Water at Start of Year 0.00 0.
22 Snow Water at End of Year 0.00 0.
23 Annual Water Budget Balance 0.00 0. 0.00
24
910313.1208
APP F-28

f'T
1
2
3
4
5
Precipitation
Totals
6 Run-off
7 Totals
Std. Deviations
8 Std. Deviations
' 9 Evapotranspiration
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Average Monthly Values In Inches for Years 1979 Through 1988
Jan/Jul Feb/Aug Mar/Sep Apr/Oct May/Nov Jun/Dec
0.78 0.75 0.66 0.44 0.50 0.42
0.18 0.09 0.51 0.41 1.09 1.25
0.53 0.46 0.29 0.40 0.41 0.40
0.14 0.12 0.28 0.40 0.57 0.60
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
10 Totals 0.546 1.028 1.302 0.579 0.739 1.058
0.376 0.085 0.260 0.240 0.443 0.447
11 Std. Deviations 0.178 0.441 0.707 0.268 0.472 0.855
=.r 0.323 0.094 0.133 0.118 0.257 0.151
-° 12 Percolation from Laver 3
13 Totals 0.0015 0.0013 0.0014 0.0013 0.0014 0.0013
0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0012 0.0012
14 Std. Deviations 0.0007 0.0006 0.0007 0.0006 0.0006 0.0006
0.0006 0.0006 0.0006 0.0006 0.0005 0.0005
15
910313.1137
APP F-29

P^
r
r.l.
r°N
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
910313.1339
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
Average Annual Totals and (Standard Deviations) for Years
1979 Through 1988
(Inches) (Cubic Feet) Percent
Precipitation 7.08 ( 2.085) 16293. 100.00
Run-off 0.000 ( 0.000) 0. 0.00
Evapotranspiration 7.101 ( 2.060) 16333. 100.25
Percolation from Layer 0.0159 ( 0.0073) 37. 0.22
Change in Water Storage -0.033 ( 0.965) -77. -0.47
Peak Daily Values for Years 1979 Through 1988
(Inches) (Cubic Feet)
Precipitation 0.93 2139.0
Run-off 0.000 0.0
Percolation from Layer 3 0.0001 0.2
Snow Water 0.76 1738.3
Maximum Veg. soil water (vol/vol) 0.1694
Minimum Veg. soil water (vol/vol) 0.0679
APP F-30

^. z
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1 Final Water Storage at End of Year 1988
2 Layer (Inches) (Vol/Vol)
3 1 2.66 0.0888
4 2 0.97 0.0807
5 3 1.18 0.0982
6 Snow Water 0.00
FA
910313.1334
APP F-31

-9
cs+
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
910313.1424
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
5.0 COVER MATERIAL VOLUME ESTIMATES
The required volume of each of the cover components is estimated in
Table F-6. The exact surface area requirements for the cover have yet to be
determined. However, a preliminary amount of materials required for each cover
component is estimated based on the following assumptions:
• Cover area is 100 ft x 230 ft
• Cover is 3 ft high (above grade)
• The individual component thicknesses are as depicted in Figures II-5
and II-6.
Table F-6. Cover Material Volume/Area Estimates.
Cover Component Cubic Yards
Foundation Soil 1,600
Low-Permeability Soil 850
Topsoil 1,700
NOTE: Ecology must approve the final cover
design before construction.
6.0 REFERENCES
DOE/RL, 1990, Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill Closure Postclosure Plan,
DOE/RL 90-17, Department of Energy, Richland Operations, Richland,
Washington.
Israelsen, C. G. , G. G. Clyde, J. E. Fletcher, E. K. Israelsen, F. W. Haws,
P. E. Packer, and E. E. Fairer, Erosion Control During Highway
Construction, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report No. 221,
Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
EPA, 1979
PA-600/Z-79-165, Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.
APP F-32

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
-`-' 18
19
x 20
t 21
22
910313.1137
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
EPA, 1984, The Hydraulic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) Model,
EPA/530-SA-84-009, Two Volumes, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, D.C.
Lyles, L., and B. E. Allison, 1980, "Range Grasses and Their Small Grain
Equivalents for Wind Erosion Control," Journal of Range Management,
Vol. 33, No. 2, March 1980, pp. 143-146.
Nelson, J. D. and S. R. Abt, 1986, Mini-Course #3: Application of Longand
Design of Waste Disposal Systems, Presented a
ium on Geotechnical and Geohydrological Aspects of
Waste Management, orado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado,
February 1986.
Skelly, W. A., DailyT
Wash
f
, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland,
Stone, W. A, J. M. Thorp, 0. P. Gifford, and D. J. Hoitink, 1983, Climatological
Summary for the Hanford Area, PNL-4622, Pacific Northwest Laboratories,
Richland, Washington, June 1983.
APP F-33

4 `•
1
910313.1137
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
This page intentionally left blank.
APP F-34

m
e
CN
910329.1003
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
APPENDIX G
2101-M BUILDING EFFLUENT DATA
APP G-i

r.,
r^"t
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
1
2
3
4
5 This page intentionally left blank.
910329.1005
APP G-ii

.a t
DOE/RL 88-41
Revision 1
2101-M Laboratory Wastewater
Sample ID ML00= 5 UST Samples
Detected Analytes
Notes Units are PPS unless otherwise indicated.
Analyte N Average Minimum Maximum 908 CI
............................ .. ....... ....... ..a.... a*.....
Alpha Activity (LDL,pCi/L) 4 6.SE-01 1.2E-01 1.3E+00 1.0E+00
Beta Activity (pCi/L) 5 5.1E+00 2.6E+00 1.1E+01 7.5E+00
Acetone (VOA) 1 4.0E+01
Aluminum 3 2.5E+02 2.0E+02 3.3E+02 3.3E+02
Ammonium 2 1.5E+02 1.2E+02 1.8E+02 2.3E+02
Barium 5 2.2E+01 1.0E+01 3.0E+01.2.8E+01
Bis(ethylhexyl) phthalate 1 7.1E+02
Calcium 5 1.3E+04 5.8E+03 1.8E+04 1.6E+04
Chloride 5 2.4E+03 7.0E+02 3.5E+03 3.2E+03
Chloroform 3 2.3E+O1 1.1E+01 3.2E+01 3.4E+01
Chromium 1 1.0E+01
Conductivity-Field (uS) 5 8.5E+01 1.4E+01 1.3E+02 1.2E+02
Copper 5 2.6E+02 4.2E+01 5.3E+02 4.1E+02
Iron 5 4.8E+02 9.4E+01 1.3E+03 7.9E+02
Lead (GFAA) 1 3.6E+01
Magnesium 5 3.0E+03 1.3E+03 4.2E+03 3.8E+03
Manganese 5 9.2E+00 6.0E+00 1.9E+01 1.3E+01
Mercury 2 9.0E-01 3.0E-01 1.5E+00 2.7E+00
Nitrate 1 5.0E+02
Phosphate 1 1.5E+03
pH-Field 5 6.2E+00 5.1E+00 7.5E+00 6.9E+00
Potassium 5 6.8E+02 3.2E+02 8.8E+02 8.4E+02
Sodium 5 1.7E+03 2.7E+02 2.8E+03 2.5E+03
Sulfate 5 1.1E+04 5.0E+03 1.4E+04 1.3E+04
Temperature-Field (celsius) 4 2.5E+01 2.2E+01 3.2E+01 2.8E+01
TOC 7 3.4E+03 1.0E+03 1.3E+04 5.7E+03
TOX 2 1.7E+02 1.6E+02 1.9E+02 2.3E+02
TOX (LDL) 1 4.0E+01
Uranium 5 4.6E-01 3.1E-01 6.8E-01 5.7E-01
Zinc 5 8.1E+01 4.6E+01 1.4E+02 1.1E+02
APP G-1

'v
N
2101-4 Laborato ry Wastewater
ID: hL00, 5=50019, 09/17/35 10:50
Detected Analytes
Note: Units an FPO unless otherwise indicated.
Key Analyte
s
Result
S Alpha Activity (LPL,^ppCi/ L) 1.30E+00
S Beta Activity (pCi/U
4.33E+00
S Barium 2.10E+0 1
S Sis(ethylhexy k) phthalate 7.10EM2
S Calcium 1.42E+04
S Chloride 2.34E+03
S Chloroform 1.10E+0 1
S Chromium 1.00E+01
S Conductivity-Field WS) 1.27E+02
S copper 4.20E+01
S Mx si um
3.220E
S Phosphate 1.46E+03
S pN-Field 7.51E+00
S Potassium 3.82E+02
S Sulfate t.34E++ 04
S Teaoerature-Field (Celsius) 2.24E+0 1
S TOC 1.02E+03
S T0c 1.43E+03
Uranium 3."E-01
S Zinc
Key: S - Sampte, E - Extract, B - BLN*, T - Trip Stank
2101-4 Laboratory Wastewater
ID: hL00, 5=50019, 09/17/35 10:50
Undetected Anatytes
Note: MoAs art detined by contract with US Testing.
They do not reflect Procedural limitations.
Units an PPS unless otherwise indicated.
Key .WLyte
e
Result
S ACetMitrite

2101-4 Laboratory Wastewater
ID* NL00, 5=50019, 09/17/8S 1000
Undetected Ahalytes
a 6 6m
Note: NDAs are defined by contract with US Testing.
They do not ffftfct procedural li mitations.
Units are PPS wLfsf otherwise indieatfd.
Key Analyte Resu lt Key Ahalyt e
a
2101-h Laboratory Wastewater
ID: NL00, S=50019, 09117/85 10:50
Undatacted AMLytes
Note: NOAs are defined by contract with US Testing,
They do not refLfct procedural Liaitati ons.
Units am PPS unless otherwise indicated.
S BerYlliu
S ais(2-Cnlorwtlary) other
S Sla

n
2101-" Laboratory Waste wa ter
2101-" Laborato ry wastewater
ID: ML00, 5-50019, 09/17/65 10:50 ID: WOO, Sw50019, 09/17/85 10:50
Undetected Analytes
Lntect
Note: Was are defined by contract with US Testing. Note: MDAS are defined by contract with US Testing.
They do not reflect procedural tisitations.
They do not reflect p rocedural tiaitations,
Units are PM unless otherwise indicated. Units are PPS unless otherwise indicated.
Xey Analyte Resutt Key Analyt e R esu lt
S OiethyUhthalate 0 .00E+01 S Ftuoroacetic acid

a
'v
L7
I
2101-4 Laboratory wastewater
ID: NLOO, S=50019, 09/17/85 10:50
U ndetected Anelytes
9 1 0
Note: NDA$ are defined by contract with US Testing.
They ao not reflect p rocedu ral limitations.
Units are PPS unless otherwise i nd icated.
Key AMlyte
a
S 2-wthyttactonitrito
S ?ethyl meroaptan
S 4ethyt methacrytate
S 4ethyt N

a
.D
p^
1
rn
2101-M Laboratory Wastewater
ID: ML00, S=50019, 09/17/85 10:50
Undetected Analytes
Mote: MDAs are defined by contract with US Testing.
They do not reflect p rocedural limitations.
Units are PPB uiless otherwise indicated.
Key Analyte Result
S o-Toluidine hydrochloride
S TOx
S 1,2,3-Trichlo robenzene
S 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
S 1,3,5-Trichlorobenzene
S 1,1,1-Trichlo roethane
S 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
S Trichloroethene
S Trichloromethanethiol
S Trichloromonofluoromethane
S Z,4,5-Trichlorochenol
S 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
S Trichlorapropane
S 1,2,3-Trichlorooro cane
S Triethylphosphorothicate

a'O
c)
I
V
2101-9 laboratory Wastewater
ID: ",(B•500525 05/23!36 13:50
Undetected Arglytes
mote: nDAS are defin ed by c on tract with US Testing.
They no not nfleCt o rocedural !imitations.
Units an PM unless otherwise indicat ed.
Key Analyte Result
S Acetonitrile
S Acttonyl bromide
B Ac etuuryryl bromide
S Acetaoherone
S 2-Aeetylamimfluorene
S ACrolein
B ACrolein
S Acryla,de .
S Ac rylonitle n
B Acrylon,trile
S A(dicarb
S Allyl alcohol
S A-Aminobiphe"t
S AainOtthylena
S 5-AmiroetMl-3-iwsazo(ol
S 2-AminomPthalene
S Amitrole
S A^IM
S AM lira
S Antimor rf
S Araite
S BenzCC3 4cridine
hracene
S Benzene
B Benzene
S Benzidine
S Benzowftuoranthene
S BemoC ]tluormhene
S BeM&$0PentaPhene

a v
G'r
t
W
2101-71 laborato ry Waste wa ter
ID: HLM, tS- SS l OS/Z3/36 13:50
Undetected Analytes
Rote: +DAs are defined by contract with US Testing.
They do not reflect procedural•limitations.
Units an PPS unless otherwise indicated.
Key Anatyte Result
8 2-Chloroethyl viMt ether

av
v
G7
i
CO
2101-4 Laboratory Wastewater
ID: MLOO, (^^11 OS/23/86 13:50
Undetected Analytes
Note: MDAS are defined by c on tract with US Testing.
They do not reflect procedural limitation.
Units are PPB unless otherwise indicated.
Key Anatytt Resu lt
S OimethylbemCa3 anihracene

D v
"O
G•1
I
O
2101~1 Laboratory Mastevater
ID: 1L00, S-50051 05/23/66
4.50052E
13:50
d
1
m F,
3
1
2101-4 laborato ry Yastewttr
I0: +LOO, tS- SS hi s 05/23/66 13:50
Undetected Analytts
Undetected ANlytes
• Note: MDAS are defined by Contra ct with US Testing.
They dp not reflect p rocedural Limitations.
Note: MDAs are defined by contract with US Testing. Units are PPB unless othetwise indicated.
They do not reflect procedural limitations.
Units art PPB unless otheroise indicat ed . Key ^Y
Analyt e Result
K e y Arelyte
B „ethyl ethyL ketone
S 4ethylh yyddrazing
S 2-MthYllactonitrilt
S Methyl aereaptan
B MethyL mercaptan
S Methyl methac rylatt
B Methyl aethacrylate
S Methyl Mthantsulfonate
S Methylnitroso rathane
S MethylwtrosovinylYiM
S 2-4 1 hy LPyridine
S Aethylthiouracil
S 1-Naphthalamine
S Naphthalene
S 1,1-Wphthaltnediorn
S Mickel
S Nicotinic acid
S Nitrate
S a-oitroaniline
S Nitrobenzene
S Otrophomt
S lrMit rosodiethanolaaine
S N-NitrosomethyYlethylamine
S witit rosamorp!oline
S *Idtrosond rnicotine
S Mitrosaoiperidine
S Mitrosopyrrolidine
S 5-Mitrc-o-toluidine
Result

a 'vv
c'a
I
2101-4 Laborato ry wastewater
I0: KOO, (S5 i 05/23/66 13:50
me
Undetetted AMLytes
Note: NDAS are defined by contract with US Testing.
They do not reflect procedural Limitations.
Units are PPS unless otherwise indicated.
Key Analyte Result
S 1,1,Z,2-Tetr4chloroet hsne
8 1,1,Z,2-Tetrachloroete han
S Tetrachloroethylene
S Tetrachtoroeth yy lene
S 2,3,a,6"Tetracl^ Loroohenol
S Thiofanox
S Thioghenol
S Thiurr
S Toluene
8 Toluene
S Toluenedirine
S o4otuidine hydrochloride
S 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,4 "
S -T^ichLo
ob*rzene
11.80E+01

a .D
cs
r
N
2101-H Laboratory Wastewater
ID: )100, (S•SOM9 07/17/86 13:20
Detected AnatYtes
Note: Units an PPB unless otherwise indicated.
Key AnaLYte ResuLt
S ALDha Activity (LOL 3p011)
S Beta Activity (PCi/^
S Alumina
S Barium
S Calcium
S Chloride
S Chloro form
S Conduetivity- Fi eld (uS)
S Iron r
S Magnesium
S xwgxnese
S Mercury
B MethYYlax Chloride
S pH-Field
S Potassium
S Sodi um
S Sulfate
roraturt- F i eld (celsius)
S TO
S TOK
S Uranium
S zinc
^ I I
1.20E-01
3.02E+00
1.95E+02
3.00E+01
1.77E+06
3.5aE+03
3.20E+01
1.30E+02
8.90E+01
2.80E+02
6.16E+0S
6.00E+00
3.00E-0 1
Mc
I 1E+00
7.97E+02
+
1.12E+06
011
1.96 E
1.91E+02
5.66E-0 1
7.00E+01
Key: S = Sample, E • Extract, B • Blank, T • Trip Blank
a
2101-M Laboratory Wastewater
ID: +100, (^0f 07/17/86 13:20
Undetected AMalytes
Note'. +DAs an defined by contract with US Testing.
They donot reflect procedural limitations.
units a re PPS inkese otherwise indi cated.
Key Anatyte
a
Result
S Atetonitrite

Y
v
v
G7
i
w
2101-0 laboratory Wastewater
Io: 1e.00, (8.300V 07/17/86 13:20
Undetected Malytes
Note: MDAS are defi ne d by Contract with US Testing.
They donot reflect procedural limitations.
Units are PPS un Less otherwise indicated.
Key MaLyte
a
Result
S Banzaca)pyrene

a •vv
GL)
A
2101 •+a laborato ry Wastewater
ID: MA,S= ( 0M 07/17/86
Undetected Analytes
13:20
2101-+1 laboratory Wastewater
ID: x100,(8= 07/17/86 13:20
500905
Undetected Analytes
Mote: rOAS are defined by contract with US Testing.
Note: LDA$ arc defined by contract with US Testing.
They do not reflect orotetlural limitations,
Units are PPS unless otherwise indicated.
Key Ana lyte Result
a
They do not reflect ofocedurat limitations.
(knits are PPS unless otherwise indicated.
Key Anal)rte Result
s
S Di
S m- Oichlorobenterwr

a
v
I
N
2101-R laboratory Wastewater
I3 ._
2101-M laboratory waste ter
Io: (S=50089s 07/17/86 13:20 Io: e.OD,IS=500 089 07/17/86 13:20
Undetected AmLytes
tote: nDAs an defined by contract with US Testing.
up not mtt*ct Limitations.
Unitsyan PP8 unless other wiea indicated
Key Analyte Result
S Elyci dy laldehyydGe

a v
1
Ol
2101-M laboratory Waste water
ID: ICAO, S=50089 07/17/36 13:20
6 5
Undetected Analyzes
Mote: MDAS an defined by contract with US Testing.
They do not reflect procedural limitations.
Units art PPB unless otherwise indicated.
Key Analyte Result
s
S Pentachlorobentene

D
v
i
V
2101-0 Laboratory wast ewater
ID-. )ILM, ( S f 071 17/36 13-.20
Undetected Anatytes
Note: RDA$ are defined by contract with US Testing.
They donot reflect ProctduraL limitations.
Units are PPS unless otherwise indicated.
Key AMLyte Result
8 1,2,3-Trichlorcororoppaannee

D 'o
L1
N
00
N'i1
„„1
21(n-* Laborato ry gastewater 2101-A Laboratory wastewter
Io: Nt00, (^167 10/30/$6 13:22 101 ?too, (^S6 10/30136 13.22
lbdeteettd Analytes tkdeteeted Analytes
Note. RDAs are defined by =tract with US Testing.
indicated.O°s
Un syamt P LB uht gss otMrwise
Key
a
Analyte
Result
S Acetonitrilt

nv.
v
ca
1
2101-R Laborato ry Wutewter
ID: MOD.0167 10 130/86 13:22
Undetected Analytes
rote: RDAs are defined by contract with US Testing.
They do not reflect procedural Limitations.
Units are PPS WLtss otherwise indicated.
Key AlNtyte
a
Rtsult
S Chtoroferm

a v
Di
I
N O
2101-4 Laboratory Waste wa ter
ID: MOD,L^0167 10/30/86 13:22
Undetected Arw Lytes
Hotel MDAs are defined by contract with US Testing,
They do not reflect procedural limitations,
Units are "a unless otherwise indicated.
Key
s
Analyte
Result
S Dimsth lbenzCa3anthracane

a v
1
N
2101-M Laboratory Wastewater
ID:
10/30/86 13:22
M.00,(^501685
Undetected Analytes
9 ! 1
Note: MDAs are defined by contract with US Testing.
They do not reflect ProceduraL Limitations.
Units are PPS unless otherwise indicated.
Key Anatyte Result
S Methyl ethyl ketone
8 Methyl eth y L ketone
S Methythyi^drazine
S 2-MethyLLactonitriLs
S Methyl mercaptan

n
v
G'a
N
2101-M Laborato ry Wastewater
ID: MOO,

D
c v
rs
1
N
W
2101- 4 L.acnratory wastewater
ID: hAO,
(8 02335
Detected Analytes
01/26/87 10:25
Note: Units are PPS unless otherwise indicated.
Key AnaLyte ReauLt
S Sets Activity (pCi/ L) 2.57 E-00
S Aanmiu
1.76E+02
S atri um
1,00E+01
S Catet um
5.80E+03
S Chloride
7.00E+02
S Conductivity-Fie Ld WS)
S Copper
S Iron
S Magnesium
5 Manganese
a Methylene chloride
S mt-Field
S Potassi um
S SuLfum
S Sut tate
4,56E+02
2.41E+02
1.30E+03
7.00E+0G
5.50E+01
5.24E+00
3.16E+02
1.97E+03
S Teneraturrfie Ld (cetsius) 3.17E+01
S TOC
1.28E+04
S TOX (LDL)
4.02E+0t
S Uranium
S Zinc
0. 60E+01
Undetected Ana Lytes
Note: MDAs are defined by contract with US Testing.
They do not reflect procedural Limitations.
Units are PPS un Less otherwise indicated.
Key AnaLyte Result
S Acetmitrile
S ADetcnyL bromide
B Aeetmmyyl bromide
S ACMPnenOne
S 2-Acetytaminofluorene

210" Laboratory Wastewater
ID: AM, (S-500232 01/26/87 10:25
233),
Undetected Analytes
9 i 1 _„t8
Note•. NDAS are defined by cont ra ct with US Testing.
They do not reflect procedural Limitations.
Units are PPS unl es s otherwise i nd icated.
Key Anslyte R esuLt
S Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane

nv
Gib
N
2101-M laboratory wastewater
ID: N.00, (8-5002 23 32 01/26/87 10:25
Undetected Ani Lytes
Note: MDAS are defined by contract with US Testin g . .
They do not reflect procedural limitations.
Units are PM unto S otherwise indicated.
Key Analyte Res ult
S t,s-Dichtoro-2-butem

n v
i
N
m
2101" Laboratory Wastewater
ID: ML00,(^0 32, 01/26/87 10:25
Undetected AneLYtes
Note'. MDAS are defi ned by contract with US listing.
They do not reflect procedural Limitations.
Unite are PPO unless otherwise indicated.
Key Ana Lyte Result
S Hexachtoropropem

n
'v
v
G's
I
N
V
2101-N Laboratory Wastewater
ID: mLOO,CSS•50232 01/26/87 10:25
Undetected Anatytes
Note: MOAs are defined by contract with US Testing.
They do not reflect orocedurst Limitations.
Units are PPS unless otherwise indicated.
Key AOalyt tResul t
s
8 Pentathtoroethane

n v
c1
N CO
2101-n Labo ratory Wastewater
ID: N.00, S •50232 01/26/87 10:25
(0.50233)
Undetected Anetytes
Note: nDAS are defined by contract with US Testing.
They do not reflect procedural limitations.
unit are PPE unless otherwise indicated.
Key Anatyte Aesult
S Wrinitrobenzene

Number of Copies
O NSITE
DOE/RL 88-41
DISTRIBUTION
11 U.S. Department of Energy-
Richland Operations Office
R. D. Izatt (9) A5-19
DOE-RL Reading Room (2) Al-65
Pacific Northwest Laboratory
M. A. Chamness K6-96
Hanford Technical Library P8-55
32 Westinghouse Hanford Company
H. N. Bowers R3-60
R. A. Carlson H4-55
C. J. Chou H4-56
J. J. Consort H4-56
W. G. Cox (3) H4=57
L. P. Diediker TI-32
C. K. Disibio B3-03
C. J. Geier H4-57
D. J. Hoff H4-57
L. A. Kemp H4-17
M. J. La Barge B2-19
R. J. Landon 62-19
S. M. McKinney T1-30
M. A. Mihalic L4-86
L. L. Powers B2-35
W. A. Retterer S2-93
F. A. Ruck III H4-57
L. W. Vance H4-16
M. A. Wasemiller H4-55
B. D. Williamson B3-15
Central Files L8-15
EDMC/AR (6) H4-22
Document Clearance and
Administration (3) H4-17
Distr-1

G^+
THIS ^.4F+'. ^.-pom-tm •R.^r^mt n.^n :(('GL di ¢a€'
5ii .`t 'Sn yr 5a^il 6rcTS a9n:^F Li
LEY^ BLANK