19.06.2013 Views

UTOPIAN PROMISE - Annenberg Media

UTOPIAN PROMISE - Annenberg Media

UTOPIAN PROMISE - Annenberg Media

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

18 UNIT 3, <strong>UTOPIAN</strong> <strong>PROMISE</strong><br />

band spent the following year in Boston, then moved to Wethersfield,<br />

Connecticut, where Joseph Rowlandson became the town’s minister.<br />

After he died in 1678, Mary Rowlandson married Captain Samuel<br />

Talcott and lived in Wethersfield with him until her death in 1711 at<br />

the age of seventy-three.<br />

Rowlandson tells her readers that she composed her narrative out of<br />

gratitude for her deliverance from captivity and in the hopes of conveying<br />

the spiritual meaning of her experience to other members of the<br />

Puritan community. In many ways, her narrative conforms to the conventions<br />

of the jeremiad, a form usually associated with second-generation<br />

Puritan sermons but also relevant to many other kinds of Puritan<br />

writing. Drawing from the Old Testament books of Jeremiah and<br />

Isaiah, jeremiads work by lamenting the spiritual and moral decline of<br />

a community and interpreting recent misfortunes as God’s just punishment<br />

for that decline. But at the same time that jeremiads bemoan<br />

their communities’ fall from grace, they also read the misfortunes and<br />

punishments that result from that fall as paradoxical proofs of God’s<br />

love and of the group’s status as his “chosen people.” According to jeremidic<br />

logic, God would not bother chastising or testing people he did<br />

not view as special or important to his divine plan. Rowlandson is careful<br />

to interpret her traumatic experience according to these orthodox<br />

spiritual ideals, understanding her captivity as God’s punishment for<br />

her (and the entire Puritan community’s) sinfulness and inadequacy<br />

and interpreting her deliverance as evidence of God’s mercy.<br />

But in spite of its standardized jeremidic rhetoric, Rowlandson’s<br />

narrative is also marked by contradictions and tensions that sometimes<br />

seem to subvert accepted Puritan ideals. On occasion, the<br />

demands of life in the wilderness led Rowlandson to accommodate<br />

herself to Native American culture, which she viewed as “barbaric,” in<br />

order to work actively for her own survival even as she cherished an<br />

ideal of waiting patiently and passively for God to lead her, and to<br />

express anger and resentment even as she preached the submissive<br />

acceptance of God’s will. Thus, Rowlandson’s Narrative provides<br />

important insight not only into orthodox Puritan ideals and values but<br />

also, however unintentionally, into the conflicted nature of her own<br />

Puritan identity.<br />

TEACHING TIPS<br />

■ When Rowlandson’s Narrative was first published in 1682, it was<br />

printed with a “Preface” written by the influential Puritan minister<br />

Increase Mather, and with a sermon composed by her husband,<br />

Joseph Rowlandson. Some scholars have speculated that Joseph<br />

Rowlandson and Mather were also extensively involved in the production<br />

of the Narrative itself; the frequency and aptness of biblical quotations<br />

in the text might indicate the hand of an experienced cleric. After<br />

providing students with this background information, ask for their<br />

opinions on whether or not (or to what extent) Rowlandson was mediated<br />

and guided by Puritan authorities when composing this text. Ask<br />

them to offer specific textual evidence to back up their speculations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!