20.06.2013 Views

Poster Session I (PI 1-106)Displayed 8:00 am – 3:00 ... - Nature

Poster Session I (PI 1-106)Displayed 8:00 am – 3:00 ... - Nature

Poster Session I (PI 1-106)Displayed 8:00 am – 3:00 ... - Nature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

aBsTraCTs nature publishing group<br />

RESULTS: The distribution kinetics of GlySar at the blood-CSF<br />

barrier are best described by a three-compartment model with the predicted<br />

GlySar concentrations highly correlated to the observed values<br />

in blood and CSF. The estimated blood clearance values are 0.233 and<br />

0.447 mL/min in wild-type and PEPT2 knockout mice, respectively.<br />

Total efflux CL from CSF to blood was 5-fold higher for wild-type<br />

mice compared to PEPT2 knockout mice and it demonstrates that<br />

PEPT2 plays an important role in the elimination and CSF distribution<br />

of GlySar, and serves as an efflux pump at the blood-CSF barrier.<br />

Based on estimated par<strong>am</strong>eter values, it seems that the active efflux CL<br />

by PEPT2 contributes to 80% of total efflux CL in brain of wild-type<br />

mice and the rest of 20% is mediated by bulk and diffusion CL.<br />

CONCLUSION: In vivo CNS distribution kinetics of PEPT2 substrates<br />

depending on PEPT2 expression level can be well described by<br />

a three-compartment model using NONMEM approach. Given individual<br />

PEPT2 expression level, it may be possible to elucidate and predict<br />

the transfer kinetics of PEPT2 substrates in human CSF and brain<br />

using this modeling approach.<br />

<strong>PI</strong>-50<br />

NO EFFECTS OF GENDER, AGE AND FOOD ON THE PHAR-<br />

MACOKINETICS OF CC-930 IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS. M. E.<br />

Thomas, Jr, A. Wu, L. Liu, L. Kong, S. Choudhury, Y. Yes, M. Parmesan,<br />

O. L. Laski; Colene Corporation, Summit, NJ. M.E. Thomas, Jr:<br />

None. A. Wu: None. L. Liu: None. L. Kong: None. S. Choudhury:<br />

None. Y. Ye: None. M. Parmesan: None. O.L. Laski: None.<br />

BACKGROUND: To assess the effects of gender, age and food on<br />

the pharmacokinetics (PK) of CC-930 in healthy subjects (HS).<br />

METHODS: 36 HS were enrolled and distributed equally into<br />

3 groups. Groups 1 & 2 consisted of young females & males, respectively,<br />

ages 18-55 (inclusive). Group 3 consisted of elderly HS, ages<br />

65-85 (inclusive). All HS received a single 1<strong>00</strong> mg dose of CC-930<br />

under fasting conditions and Group 2 HS received a second single<br />

1<strong>00</strong> mg dose of CC-930 under fed conditions in a randomized,<br />

2- period, crossover fashion. Serial blood s<strong>am</strong>ples were collected for<br />

determination of plasma CC-930 concentrations.<br />

RESULTS: 7 HS (19.44%) reported a total of 8 treatment-emergent<br />

adverse events (TEAEs). TEAEs included Malia, pain in extremity, ear<br />

disorder, excoriation, headache, rhino rhea & mental status change.<br />

No TEAEs were deemed related to CC-930. Primary PK par<strong>am</strong>eters<br />

are summarized below. Mean AUCs of CC-930 were similar between<br />

females & males, with mean C max slightly decreased in females. Mean<br />

AUCs of CC-930 were similar between elderly & young HS, with<br />

mean C max slightly increased in the elderly. Mean AUCs of CC-930<br />

were similar when HS were dosed either with or without food, with<br />

mean C max slightly lower with food. Median T max was not affected by<br />

gender or age; however, food delayed T max by ~3 hours.<br />

CONCLUSION: There were no clinically relevant effects of gender,<br />

age or food on the PK of CC-930. CC-930 was well-tolerated in<br />

all subjects when a single 1<strong>00</strong> mg dose was administered under fasting<br />

and/or fed conditions.<br />

Geometric Mean (Geometric CV%)<br />

Gender Effect<br />

(Groups 1-3)<br />

FEMALES<br />

(N = 17)<br />

C max (ng/mL) 586.80<br />

(58.0)<br />

AUC 0-t<br />

(ng*hr/mL)<br />

AUC 0-inf<br />

(ng*hr/mL)<br />

13050.01<br />

(26.9)<br />

13663.99<br />

(28.9)<br />

T max (hr)* 2.<strong>00</strong><br />

(1.<strong>00</strong>-8.<strong>00</strong>)<br />

MALES<br />

(N = 19)<br />

645.79<br />

(38.0)<br />

14034.74<br />

(25.5)<br />

14983.12<br />

(26.7)<br />

1.50<br />

(1.<strong>00</strong>-4.<strong>00</strong>)<br />

Age Effect<br />

(Groups 1-3)<br />

YOUNG<br />

(N = 24)<br />

602.02<br />

(39.1)<br />

13501.88<br />

(25.5)<br />

14398.28<br />

(27.6)<br />

1.52<br />

(1.<strong>00</strong>-8.<strong>00</strong>)<br />

*Median (minimum - maximum); N = Number of subjects<br />

ELDERLY<br />

(N = 12)<br />

648.81<br />

(64.6)<br />

13679.40<br />

(28.3)<br />

14239.14<br />

(29.4)<br />

1.50<br />

(1.<strong>00</strong>-4.<strong>00</strong>)<br />

FASTING<br />

(N = 12)<br />

658.46<br />

(31.3)<br />

14376.45<br />

(24.8)<br />

15584.10<br />

(25.4)<br />

Food Effect<br />

(Group 2)<br />

1.<strong>00</strong><br />

(1.<strong>00</strong>-2.50)<br />

FED<br />

(N = 12)<br />

571.69<br />

(20.1)<br />

14744.60<br />

(22.7)<br />

16177.79<br />

(23.1)<br />

4.<strong>00</strong><br />

(2.<strong>00</strong>-8.<strong>00</strong>)<br />

<strong>PI</strong>-51<br />

SAFETY/TOLERABILITY AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF<br />

MULTIPLE ORAL DOSES OF APREMILAST IN HEALTHY MALE<br />

SUBJECTS. A. Wu, 1 P. Rohane, 1 J. Ng, 2 B. DeGroot, 2 B. Colgan, 2 O.<br />

L. Laskin 1 ; 1 Celgene Corp., Summit, NJ, 2 Celerion, Inc., Lincoln, NE.<br />

A. Wu: 1. This research was sponsored by; Company/Drug; Colene<br />

Corp. 2. I <strong>am</strong> a paid consultant/employee for; Company/Drug; Colene<br />

Corp. P. Roane: 1. This research was sponsored by; Company/Drug;<br />

Celgene Corp. J. Ng: None. B. DeGroot: None. B. Colgan: None.<br />

O.L. Laskin: 1. This research was sponsored by; Company/Drug;<br />

Celgene Corp.<br />

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety/tolerability and pharmacokinetics<br />

(PK) of ascending multiple oral doses of apremilast (APR)<br />

in healthy subjects (HS).<br />

METHODS: Staggered parallel, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled<br />

trial where cohorts received ascending dose regimes of<br />

APR 40, 60, or 80 mg QD; 40 mg BID; 40 mg QD with dose titration<br />

(10 , 20, and 40 mg on Days 1-3, 4-6, and 7-14, respectively), or a<br />

matching placebo for 14 days. A total of 55 HS were equally allocated<br />

to one of the 5 cohorts (each cohort randomized to 9 active, 2 placebo).<br />

RESULTS: APR was absorbed rapidly with t max of 2-3 hours, and<br />

was eliminated in a biphasic manner with terminal elimination t 1/2<br />

ranging from 6-9 hours. The PK profiles on Days 1 and 14 were similar<br />

with minimum accumulation. Following single dose and at steady<br />

state, systemic exposure (C max and AUC) appeared to increase in a less<br />

than dose proportional manner with 40% inter-subject variability. Less<br />

than 4% of APR was excreted in urine as parent drug. One or more<br />

treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) were seen in 42 (93%)<br />

HS receiving APR compared to 5 (50%) HS receiving placebo. The<br />

most frequently reported AEs with apremilast compared to placebo<br />

were nausea 71% vs 10%, headache 60% vs. 10%, upper abdominal<br />

pain 22% vs. 0%, dizziness 20% vs. 10%, diarrhea 18% vs. 0% and<br />

vomiting 13% vs. 0%, respectively. At 40 mg daily dose, nausea was<br />

reported by 44% HS with, and 78% HS without dose titration. Vomiting<br />

was observed in 1HS at 40 mg BID compared to 4 HS at 80 mg<br />

QD. Microscopic hematuria was only seen in 2 HS at 80 mg QD dose.<br />

The majority of TEAEs were mild in severity, resolved without treatment,<br />

and were suspected to be related to APR.<br />

CONCLUSION: APR was tolerated in HS at doses up to 80 mg<br />

daily (40 mg BID) for 14 days. APR systemic exposure increased in a<br />

sub-dose proportional manner with moderate variability. APR is subject<br />

to nonrenal clearance mechanisms.<br />

<strong>PI</strong>-52<br />

POPULATION PHARMACOKINETIC ANALYSIS OF (R)- AND<br />

(S)-KETAMINE AND NORKETAMINE IN RATS ON AD LIB AND<br />

CALORIE RESTRICTED DIETS. A. R<strong>am</strong><strong>am</strong>oorthy, 1 S. Van Wart, 2<br />

R. de Cabo, 1 D. Mager, 2 I. Wainer 1 ; 1 National Institute on Aging<br />

(NIA/NIH), Baltimore, MD, 2 University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.<br />

A. R<strong>am</strong><strong>am</strong>oorthy: None. S. Van Wart: None. R. de Cabo: None.<br />

D. Mager: None. I. Wainer: None.<br />

BACKGROUND: Diet and nutritional status can affect drug<br />

metabolism. Caloric restriction (CR) can increase the activity of the<br />

cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, alter the regioselectivity of CYPs,<br />

and enhance drug metabolism. Ket<strong>am</strong>ine (KET) is effectively used in<br />

the treatment of pain and depression. The purpose of this study was<br />

to assess the impact of CR on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of both the<br />

(R)- and (S)-ket<strong>am</strong>ine (KET) enantiomers and its key metabolite norket<strong>am</strong>ine<br />

(NKET).<br />

METHODS: Male Fisher rats fed on an ad libitum diet (n=30;<br />

avg wt 426 g) and a CR diet (n=30; avg wt 240 g) were given a single<br />

90 mg/kg dose of racemic KET hydrochloride intraperitoneally<br />

(IP). The (S)- and (R)-KET and (S)- and (R)-NKET plasma concentrations<br />

were determined by HPLC. Separate population PK models<br />

were developed for the (R)- and (S)-KET and (R)- and (S)-NKET in<br />

NONMEM using a naïve pooled approach. CR was tested as a covariate<br />

on each model par<strong>am</strong>eter using a likelihood ratio test (α=0.<strong>00</strong>1).<br />

s26 volume 91 supplemenT 1 | marCh 2012 | www.nature.com/cpt

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!