20.06.2013 Views

Poster Session I (PI 1-106)Displayed 8:00 am – 3:00 ... - Nature

Poster Session I (PI 1-106)Displayed 8:00 am – 3:00 ... - Nature

Poster Session I (PI 1-106)Displayed 8:00 am – 3:00 ... - Nature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

aBsTraCTs nature publishing group<br />

<strong>PI</strong>-15<br />

FOLIC ACID AND COLORECTAL ADENOMA RECURRENCE:<br />

A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRI-<br />

ALS. D. A. Kennedy, S. J. Stern, I. Matok, M. Moretti, M. Sarkar,<br />

T. Ad<strong>am</strong>s-Webber, G. Koren; The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto,<br />

ON, Canada. D.A. Kennedy: None. S.J. Stern: None. I. Matok:<br />

None. M. Moretti: None. M. Sarkar: None. T. Ad<strong>am</strong>s-Webber:<br />

None. G. Koren: None.<br />

BACKGROUND: The theory of ‘‘dual effect of folate’’ in cancer<br />

postulates that in healthy persons folate supplementation decreases<br />

the rates of cancer, while heightened folate exposure may increase the<br />

rate of malignant transformation of precancerous cells. Our aim was to<br />

ex<strong>am</strong>ine the risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence under a high intake<br />

of folic acid in the context of folic acid supplementation.<br />

METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and SCOPUS were searched<br />

from inception to April, 2011: using the following ‘‘folic acid,’’ ‘‘folate,”<br />

‘‘colorectal adenomas,’’ ‘‘recurrence.’’ Randomized control studies<br />

reporting on colorectal adenoma recurrence and folic acid supplementation<br />

of at least 1 mg/day were selected. Studies were excluded if supplementation<br />

was combined with other vit<strong>am</strong>ins or pharmaceutical drugs.<br />

RESULTS: Out of the 4013 records retrieved, 4 articles met the<br />

inclusion criteria. Three of the studies were conducted in the United<br />

States either during, or overlapping with, mandatory folate fortification.<br />

Three of the studies supplemented with 1 mg/day for up to 6 years.<br />

The remaining study used 5 mg/day for three years. The reported risk<br />

ratio of colorectal adenoma recurrence with 1 mg/day after one year<br />

was 0.60 (CI 95% 0.27-1.33), after 3 years, 1.20 (CI 95% 0.95-1.51)<br />

and 0.82 (CI 95% 0.59-1.13). A risk ratio was not reported after 5 mg/<br />

day for 3 years, rather the risk was described as “twice as high in the<br />

placebo group versus the folic acid group.”<br />

CONCLUSION: Supplementation of folic acid at either 1 mg/day<br />

or 5 mg/day for a period of three years in an environment of mandatory<br />

folate fortification did not increase nor decrease the risk of colorectal<br />

adenoma recurrence in those individuals with a previous history of<br />

colorectal adenomas. Pregnant women, at higher risk for neural tube<br />

defects or other folate-dependent malformations, who may need a high<br />

daily dose of folate (up to 5 mg/day) can use these doses safely for the<br />

short period of first trimester of pregnancy.<br />

<strong>PI</strong>-16<br />

HIGH RISK PRESCRIBING AND INCIDENCE OF FRAILTY<br />

AMONG OLDER COMMUNITY-DWELLING MEN. D. Gnjidic, 1 S.<br />

N. Hilmer, 1 D. G. Le Couteur, 2 D. R. Abernethy 3 ; 1 Royal North Shore<br />

Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 2 Centre for Education<br />

and Research on Ageing (CERA) and University of Sydney,<br />

Sydney, Australia, 3 Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD.<br />

D. Gnjidic: None. S.N. Hilmer: 4. I hold a patent for; Company/<br />

Drug; Drug Burden Index. D.G. Le Couteur: None. D.R. Abernethy:<br />

4. I hold a patent for; Company/Drug; Drug Burden Index.<br />

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the association between treatment<br />

with high risk medicines and frailty in older adults is limited. We aimed<br />

to investigate the relationship between high risk prescribing and frailty<br />

at baseline, and 2-year incident frailty in older adults.<br />

METHODS: A total of 1662 community-dwelling males, aged ≥70<br />

years enrolled in the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project were<br />

studied. Measurements were obtained at baseline (2<strong>00</strong>5-2<strong>00</strong>7) and<br />

2-year follow-up (2<strong>00</strong>7-2<strong>00</strong>9). High risk prescribing was defined as<br />

polypharmacy (use of ≥ 5 medicines), hyperpolypharmacy (use of ≥ 10<br />

medicines) and by the Drug Burden Index (DBI), a dose-normalized<br />

measure of anticholinergic and sedative medicines. Frailty was defined<br />

according to validated criteria. Odds ratios of frailty were modeled<br />

using logistic regression, and adjusted for age, education, marital status<br />

and multiple comorbidities.<br />

RESULTS: There were 9.4% participants who were identified as<br />

frail at baseline. At baseline, frail participants had adjusted odds ratios<br />

(ORs) of 2.55 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.69-3.84) for polypharmacy,<br />

5.80 (95% CI: 2.90-11.61) for hyperpolypharmacy and<br />

2.33 (95%CI: 1.58-3.45) for DBI exposure, compared with non-frail.<br />

Among the 1242 men who were non-frail at baseline, 6.2% developed<br />

frailty over two years. Adjusted ORs of incident frailty were 2.45<br />

(95%CI: 1.42-4.23) for polypharmacy, 2.50 (95%CI: 0.76-8.26) for<br />

hyperpolypharmacy, and 2.14 (95%CI: 1.25-3.64) for DBI exposure.<br />

CONCLUSION: Older frail men were significantly more likely to<br />

be exposed to high risk prescribing than non-frail older men at baseline,<br />

and exposure to high risk medicines was significantly related to<br />

the development of frailty over two years.<br />

<strong>PI</strong>-17<br />

POLYPHARMACY AND ADVERSE OUTCOMES: DETER-<br />

MINING THE BEST CUT-OFF FOR POLYPHARMACY<br />

ASSOCIATED WITH GERIATRIC SYNDROMES, FUNC-<br />

TIONAL OUTCOMES AND MORTALITY IN OLDER ADULTS.<br />

D. Gnjidic, 1 D. G. Le Couteur, 2 S. N. Hilmer 1 ; 1 Royal North Shore<br />

Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 2 Centre<br />

for Education and Research on Ageing (CERA) and University of<br />

Sydney, Sydney, Australia. D. Gnjidic: None. D.G. Le Couteur:<br />

None. S.N. Hilmer: None.<br />

BACKGROUND: There is lack of agreement about the best cut-off<br />

value for the number of concomitant medications that should be used<br />

to define polypharmacy. We aimed to determine an optimal discriminating<br />

number of concomitant medications for the associations with<br />

adverse outcomes in older adults.<br />

METHODS: Males aged ≥ 70 years (n=1705), participating in<br />

the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project were studied. Measurements<br />

were obtained at baseline (2<strong>00</strong>5-2<strong>00</strong>7) and follow-up<br />

assessments. Frailty was ascertained according to the validated criteria.<br />

Disability was assessed using the Activities of Daily Living<br />

scale. Participants were categorized as cognitively impaired (mildcognitive-impairment<br />

or dementia) using clinical diagnostic criteria.<br />

Prospective data on mortality and incident falls were collected<br />

by 4-monthly telephone calls. Receiver operating characteristics<br />

curve analysis using the Youden Index and the area under curve was<br />

performed to determine discriminating number of medications in<br />

relation to each outcome. Odds ratios were calculated for the association<br />

of the number of concomitant medications with each of the<br />

outcomes.<br />

RESULTS: The highest value of the Youden Index for frailty was<br />

obtained for a cut-off point of 6.5 medications, compared to a cut-off<br />

of 5.5 for disability and 3.5 for cognitive impairment. For mortality<br />

and falls, the highest value of Youden Index was obtained for a cut-off<br />

of 4.5 medications. For every one increase in number of medications,<br />

the adjusted odds ratios for age and multiple comorbidities, were 1.13<br />

(95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-1.21) for frailty, 1.08 (95%CI:<br />

1.<strong>00</strong>-1.15) for disability, 1.02 (95%CI: 0.96-1.09) for cognitive impairment,<br />

1.09 (95%CI: 1.04-1.15) for mortality and 1.07 (95%CI: 1.03-<br />

1.12) for falls.<br />

CONCLUSION: This study justifies the widespread definition of<br />

polypharmacy, which is linked to adverse outcomes, as five or more<br />

medications.<br />

<strong>PI</strong>-18<br />

A REVIEW OF FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA)<br />

LABELING FOR OVERDOSE TREATMENT AND TOXICITY<br />

DATA. M. E. Mazer, 1 G. Sokol, 2 L. Cantilena 2 ; 1 George Washington<br />

University, Washington, DC, 2 Uniformed Services University of the<br />

Health Sciences, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Bethesda, MD.<br />

M.E. Mazer: None. G. Sokol: None. L. Cantilena: None.<br />

BACKGROUND: Adverse drug reactions, including overdose, are<br />

a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The goal of the FDA is to<br />

ensure approved pharmaceuticals are safe and effective yet clinical<br />

toxicology data is often limited at the time of approval. There may also<br />

be a lag time until toxicology data is available and incorporated into<br />

labeling revisions. In order to determine the type and quality of clini-<br />

s14 volume 91 supplemenT 1 | marCh 2012 | www.nature.com/cpt

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!