20.06.2013 Views

TRIAZOLE DERIVATIVES WITH ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY: A ...

TRIAZOLE DERIVATIVES WITH ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY: A ...

TRIAZOLE DERIVATIVES WITH ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica ñ Drug Research, Vol. 65 No. 6 pp. 795ñ798, 2008 ISSN 0001-6837<br />

Polish Pharmaceutical Society<br />

<strong>TRIAZOLE</strong> <strong>DERIVATIVES</strong> <strong>WITH</strong> <strong>ANTIFUNGAL</strong> <strong>ACTIVITY</strong>:<br />

A PHARMACOPHORE MODEL STUDY<br />

ALICJA NOWACZYK* and BOØENA MODZELEWSKA-BANACHIEWICZ<br />

Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus<br />

Copernicus University, Sk≥odowskiej-Curie 9, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland<br />

Keywords: antifungal activity, pharmacophore model of triazole alcohols, UR-9825<br />

The incidence of fungal infections has<br />

increased significantly in the past two decades (1,<br />

2). The first generation of azoles antifungal<br />

inhibitors of CYP51, have revolutionized treatment<br />

of some serious fungal infections. Triazoles has<br />

been the leading agents for the control of fungal<br />

diseases of humans and animals for over 20 years<br />

(3-5). According to this, azole derivatives are currently<br />

the most widely studied class of antifungal<br />

agents. The triazole alcohols such as 2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-1,3-di(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)propan-2-ol<br />

i.e. fluconazole and (2R,3R)-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-3-(5-fluoropyrimidin-4-yl)-1-(1H-1,2,4triazol-1-yl)butan-2-ol<br />

i.e. voriconazole are the<br />

representatives of the second generation of triazole<br />

antifungal drug. The newest compound 7-chloro-3-<br />

((2R,3R)-3-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-3-hydroxy-4-<br />

(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)butan-2-yl)quinazolin-<br />

4(3H)-one, labeled as UR-9825, exhibits two<br />

important types of activity against certain fungal<br />

pathogens i.e. activity against yeasts and filamentous<br />

fungi (6). Up to date the name of compound<br />

UR-9825 is albaconazole and it is undergoing the<br />

Phase II clinical trials, but its future is uncertain (7,<br />

8). Our recent docking experiments for fluconazole,<br />

voriconazole and UR-9825 into the catalytic<br />

site of MT-CYP51 (pdb code: 1ea1) as template (9)<br />

showed that the molecules bind to the catalytic site<br />

adopting the similar bioactive conformation as<br />

observed in the crystallized complex of fluconazole<br />

with the enzyme (10). The aim of this study is<br />

a comparison of pharmacophore features of active<br />

conformation obtained via docking of the drug in<br />

Mycobacterium tuberculosis CYP51, with the pharmacophore<br />

model proposed for the antifungal<br />

drugs (11). In order to define more precisely the<br />

* Corresponding author: e-mail: alicja@cm.umk.pl<br />

795<br />

structure-activity relationship within the investigated<br />

compounds a molecular modeling study was<br />

undertaken.<br />

EXPERIMENTAL<br />

Molecular modeling and docking were carried<br />

out with the commercially available CAChe<br />

WorkSystem Pro (version 7.5.0.85) software package.<br />

All computations were performed on a HP-6200<br />

wx workstation. The crystallographic structure of the<br />

enzyme CYP51 were obtained from the Brookhaven<br />

Protein Databank, accession number 1EA1. Missing<br />

atoms in the crystal structure were added and the<br />

structure was optimized. Structures of all drugs were<br />

constructed using 3D-sketcher module available in<br />

the software. All the molecule geometries were optimized<br />

using the molecular mechanics methods MM3<br />

until the root mean square (RMS) gradient value<br />

becomes smaller than 0.1 kcal/mol Å. Force field calculations<br />

were used to ascertain whether the resulting<br />

structures corresponded to energy minima. Docking<br />

experiments were preformed using a knowledgebased<br />

strategy (11, 12). The optimized drug structure<br />

was docked into the active site of MT-CYP51 automatically<br />

by placing the nitrogen atom in position 4<br />

of the triazole ring at the 2.37Å from the heme iron<br />

atom on the center orthogonal of the heme plane in<br />

MT-CYP51. The above value is the average distance<br />

of Fe-N coordination bonds observed in the crystallized<br />

complexes of MT-CYP51 with fluconazole and<br />

4-phenylimidazole. First, the validation of the docking<br />

method was carried out by redocking fluconazole<br />

into its crystal structure in 1EA1.pdb. After successful<br />

validation, voriconazole and albaconazole were<br />

docked into MT-CYP51. The active structures


796 ALICJA NOWACZYK and BOØENA MODZELEWSKA-BANACHIEWICZ<br />

obtained due to this optimization of the drugs were<br />

then compared by superimposition procedure.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Antifungal activity of triazole agents is mainly<br />

attributed to the coordination abilities of the nitrogen<br />

atom N4(3) of the triazole ring to the iron atom<br />

of heme. The halogenated phenyl group of azole<br />

inhibitor is deep in the hydrophobic binding cleft<br />

within the heme environment of the enzymes.<br />

Additionally, the chirality at C2 and C3 atoms is<br />

important to antifungal activity. The hydroxyl group<br />

attached to C2 atom and the methyl group attached<br />

to the C3 position have been favorable for antifungal<br />

activity.<br />

All the fungal CYP51 proteins that had been<br />

characterized were membrane-bound and it is difficult<br />

to solve their crystal structures. Up to date the<br />

Table 1. The active conformations of the investigated drugs.<br />

only available solved X-ray crystal structure of<br />

CYP51 was obtained from Mycobacterium tuberculosis,<br />

but the explicit information about the enzyme<br />

binding site of pathogenic fungi is not available yet.<br />

Even when the structure is available, it is still very<br />

difficult to deduce the relative contribution of each<br />

individual residue to the total binding energy of each<br />

inhibitor. According to this, the study of the interaction<br />

between an azole and fungal CYP51 can only<br />

be done by methods of molecular modeling and a<br />

number of docking experiments have been reported<br />

in the literature (13-15). However, until now any<br />

interaction involving the oxygen atom of hydroxyl<br />

group attached to C2 was not found. It is because the<br />

activity site is so large that there is a significant distance<br />

between the oxygen atom and the groups<br />

around it (16). Hydrophobic interaction was predicted<br />

to be stronger in the case of voriconazole than<br />

that of fluconazole. It is explained by the presence of<br />

Table 2. The distances (Å) between pharmacophore features for the investigated drugs and references modeling data.<br />

Fluconazole Albaconazole Voriconazole ref. (11)<br />

a1 (Å) 4.528 4.302 4.253 (4.104 ñ 4.872)<br />

b1 (Å) 3.545 3.591 3.642 (3.165 ñ 3.678)<br />

a2 (Å) 6.233 6.574 6.596 (6.545 ñ 6.934)<br />

b2 (Å) 3.638 3.896 4.059 (3.810 ñ 3.887)<br />

c (Å) 5.193 5.079 4.888 (4.016 ñ 4.575)<br />

Table 3. The superimposition of the investigated compounds.


Figure 1. The pharmacophore model of triazole antifungal alcohols.<br />

extra methyl group attached to the C3 atom of<br />

voriconazole molecule (15). In the literature, the<br />

pharmacophore model was proposed for azole antifungals<br />

(11, 15).<br />

According to the literature we have to define<br />

pharmacophore points such as: A ñ coordination site<br />

in heme, B ñ hydrogen bond acceptor atom, C ñ<br />

hydrophobic interaction groups [i.e. the center of<br />

diphenylphenyl ring and methyl group or prochiral<br />

hydrogen atom (17)]. The intermolecular distances<br />

and angles in the proposed pharmacophore model<br />

are as follows: a 1 ñ the distance between the heterocyclic<br />

N4(3) nitrogen atom of triazole moiety and<br />

the hydrogen bond acceptor a 2 ñ the distance<br />

between N4(3) atom and the center of hydrophobic<br />

interaction; b 1 ñ the distance between OH group<br />

attached to C2 and the center of diphenylphenyl<br />

ring; b 2 ñ the distance between CH 3 group or prochiral<br />

hydrogen atom attached to C3 atom and the center<br />

of diphenylphenyl ring; c ñ the distance between<br />

the N4(3) and the center of diphenylphenyl ring. The<br />

investigated active structures were compared by<br />

means of the distances listed above. In Figure 1<br />

pharmacophore feature scheme is presented for the<br />

investigated compounds. The obtained values for<br />

the compounds and references modeling data form<br />

the literature are shown in Table 2.<br />

It was found that the distances between the<br />

pharmacophore features, estimated for the selected<br />

ligands, are within the following range: a 1 = 4.253 ñ<br />

Triazole derivatives with antifungal activity... 797<br />

4.528 Å; b 1 = 3.545 ñ 3.642 Å; a 2 = 6.233 ñ 6.596 Å;<br />

b 2 = 3.638 ñ 4.059 Å; c = 4.888 ñ 5.193 Å. The<br />

results obtained show that the distance values are in<br />

the range of references data. Based on this we can<br />

treat the geometries of drugs obtained in this study<br />

as the active conformation for the investigated triazole<br />

alcohols.<br />

To obtain additional information concerning<br />

the shape of the investigated drug, the active conformations<br />

were chosen for superimposition. The<br />

atoms (except hydrogen atoms) common to these<br />

molecules were selected for the fitting procedure.<br />

Their similarity was calculated as RMS fit. The<br />

RMS routine provided estimates of how closely<br />

molecules fit to each other. The lower the RMS<br />

value, the better similarity.<br />

The RMS deviations for each group are as follows:<br />

0,399 Å (fluconazole ñ albaconazole); : 0,497<br />

Å (fluconazole ñ voriconazole); 0,610 Å (voriconazole<br />

ñ albaconazole). A comparison of the geometries<br />

of compounds shown above indicates high similarity<br />

in the orientation of the all pharmacophore<br />

points. These results confirm that the chosen group<br />

is an important structural unit for antifungal activity.<br />

The pair voriconazole ñ albaconcazole the highest<br />

RMS value in the set is due to the terminal aromatic<br />

fragments (5-fluoropyrimidin-4-yl and 7-chloroquinazolin-4(3H)-one,<br />

respectively) that have different<br />

orientation, this does not influence the pharmacophore<br />

features of the molecule though.


798 ALICJA NOWACZYK and BOØENA MODZELEWSKA-BANACHIEWICZ<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

According to obtained results concerning the<br />

pharmacophore features of antifungal drugs, it is<br />

seen that active conformations of analyzed drugs<br />

preserve the conditions imposed by existing pharmacophore<br />

model derived for antifungal drugs.<br />

According to this one can state that application in<br />

the docking studies Mycobacterium tuberculosis<br />

CYP51 is reasonable approach in case of absence of<br />

genuine fungal CYP51.<br />

The analysis of similarity of obtained active<br />

structures shows that all three compounds adopt<br />

very similar conformation in the target site of the<br />

enzyme. The only significant deviation of the structure<br />

concern fragment apart of the pharmacophoreís<br />

points. The presence of hydroxyl group in the second<br />

position and the methyl group in the third position<br />

of the propyl chain in the triazole alcohol is a<br />

crucial structure feature determining the affinity of<br />

compounds to target site. More extensive structureactivity<br />

relationship studies are in progress and will<br />

be reported in due course.<br />

Acknowledgment<br />

This study was supported by the research grant<br />

from the UMK no. 13/2008.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Enoch D.A., Ludlam H.A., Brown N.M.: J.<br />

Med. Microbiol. 55, 809 (2006).<br />

2. Tortorano A.M., Kibbler C., Peman J.,<br />

Bernhardt H., Klingspor L., Grillot R.: Int. J.<br />

Antimicrob. Agents 27, 359 (2006).<br />

3. Chakrabarti A.: J. Postgrag. Med. 51 (Suppl. 1)<br />

S16 (2005).<br />

4. Chen S.C.A., Sorrell T.C.: Med. J. Aust. 187,<br />

404 (2007).<br />

5. Cools H.J., Fraaije B.A., Kim S.H., Lucas J.A.:<br />

Biochem. Soc. Trans. 34, 1219 (2006).<br />

6. Bartroli J., Turmo E., AlguerÛ M., Boncompte<br />

E., Vericat M. L., Conte L., Ramis J., Merlos<br />

M., Garcia-Rafanell J., Forn J.: J. Med. Chem.<br />

41, 1869 (1998).<br />

7. Aperis G., Mylonakis E.: Exp. Opin. Inv. Drugs<br />

15, 579 (2006).<br />

8. Pasqualotto A.C., Denning D.W.: J. Antimicrob.<br />

Chemother. 61, Suppl. 1, i19 (2008).<br />

9. Podust L.M., Poulos T.L., Waterman M.R.:<br />

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3068 (2001).<br />

10. Nowaczyk A., Modzelewska-Banachiewicz B.:<br />

Book of Abstracts, The Sixth Multidisciplinary<br />

Conference on Drug Research 15, (2008).<br />

11. Ji H., Zhang W., Zhou Y., Zhang M., Zhu J.,<br />

Song Y., L¸ J.: J. Med. Chem. 43, 2493 (2000).<br />

12. CAChe Group Fujitsu: Getting Started with<br />

BioMedCAChe Molecular Modeling in Drug<br />

Design, Fujitsu Limited, Beaverton, Oregon<br />

2006.<br />

13. He Q.Q., Li K., Cao Y.B., Dong H.W., Zhao<br />

L.H., Liu C.M., Sheng C.Q.: Chin. Chem. Lett.<br />

18, 663 (2007).<br />

14. Macchiarulo A., Costantino G., Fringuelli D.,<br />

Vecchiarelli A., Schiaffella F., Fringuelli R.:<br />

Bioorg. Med. Chem. 10, 3415 (2002).<br />

15. Fukuoka T., Johnston D.A., Winslow C.A., de<br />

Groot M.J., Burt C., Hitchcock C A., Filler<br />

S.G.: Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47, 1213<br />

(2003).<br />

16. Ji H., Zhang W., Zhang M., et al.: J. Med.<br />

Chem. 46, 474 (2003).<br />

17. Francotte E., Lindner W.: Chirality in Drug<br />

Research, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.<br />

KGaA, Weinheim 2006.<br />

Erratum:<br />

The names of authors of the paper ìGADOLINIUM Gd(III) COMPLEXES <strong>WITH</strong> <strong>DERIVATIVES</strong><br />

OF NITRILOACETIC ACID: SYNTHESIS AND BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIESî from Acta Pol.<br />

Pharm. Drug Res. 65, issue 5, 535 (2008) are: Boles≥aw Karwowski, Ma≥gorzata Witczak, Eløbieta<br />

Mikiciuk-Olasik, and Micha≥ Studniarek.


NOTES


NOTES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!