24.06.2013 Views

Ph D Thesis Amelie Deglaire - TEL

Ph D Thesis Amelie Deglaire - TEL

Ph D Thesis Amelie Deglaire - TEL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

♦ 12<br />

Bos, 2000; Lacroix et al., 2006b; Bos et al., 2007; Humayun et al., 2007). Net<br />

postprandial protein utilization has been proposed as a better indicator of protein quality.<br />

This method has been fully developed and applied over recent years, as discussed below.<br />

Recently, Humayun et al. (2007) proposed an approach based on the “indicator AA<br />

oxidation” method as a potentially useful tool for the determination of the metabolic<br />

availability of AA in human foodstuffs. However, this method needs substantial<br />

refinement before being widely applied.<br />

2.2. Net postprandial protein utilization<br />

Net protein utilization can be directly determined using the classical N balance method;<br />

however, its major limitation is in the estimation of the net protein retention as a daily<br />

gain. Protein metabolism is subject to a diurnal cycle (fed and fasting states), resulting in<br />

alternate periods of postprandial accretion and postabsorptive losses of body proteins<br />

(Tomé & Bos, 2000). Acute N deposition during the postprandial phase is critical for the<br />

deposition of dietary N in tissues (Millward & Pacy, 1995; Tomé & Bos, 2000). Dietary<br />

N utilization directly for protein synthesis can be estimated when determined in the<br />

postprandial period, and is assumed to be a good indicator of the dietary protein<br />

nutritional value (Mariotti et al., 1999; Tomé & Bos, 2000). Net postprandial protein<br />

utilization was thus proposed as a more sensitive approach for assessing dietary protein<br />

quality (Gaudichon et al., 1999; Tomé & Bos, 2000; Reeds et al., 2000b). It can be<br />

assessed by measuring total dietary N losses usually for 8 h following ingestion of a test<br />

meal containing 15 N-labelled dietary protein (Tomé & Bos, 2000) and using the following<br />

equation:<br />

15 15<br />

Net postprandial protein utilization = [ Nintake − ( Nileal + 15 15 15<br />

Nbody urea + Nurine)]/ Nintake.<br />

When combined with true ileal digestibility, the net postprandial protein utilization<br />

allows for the measure of postprandial biological value, i.e. the proportion of absorbed N<br />

effectively used in the anabolic pathway (Mariotti et al., 1999).<br />

Unlike the net protein utilization index, which requires long-term studies due to the<br />

adaptation period (Millward & Pacy, 1995), the net postprandial protein utilization can be<br />

determined acutely because postabsorptive losses, depending on the previous level of<br />

protein intake, are not taken into account. The net postprandial protein utilization has thus<br />

been suggested as a better criterion for protein quality evaluation (Gaudichon et al., 1999;<br />

Bos et al., 2002; Bos et al., 2005a). In particular, it penalizes protein sources deficient in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!