25.06.2013 Views

THÈSE - Station Alpine Joseph Fourier - Université Joseph Fourier

THÈSE - Station Alpine Joseph Fourier - Université Joseph Fourier

THÈSE - Station Alpine Joseph Fourier - Université Joseph Fourier

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapitre II Article 2A<br />

decay (yr -1 ). Decay constants were determined for each species in each topographical location<br />

by fitting a linear-regression of the (LN-transformed) litter remaining against time. An<br />

ANCOVA was applied within topographical location to test the significance of the Mass<br />

remaining × Species interaction.<br />

Finally, an ANCOVA was applied to test the regression between (1) yearly mass loss of each<br />

substrate against mean wintertime soil temperature and (2) litter N content (proportion of<br />

initial N content) of each species against mass loss. Analysed data were the mean of each<br />

harvest, in each topographical location. Species were considered as the qualitative factor<br />

whereas mean wintertime soil temperature (1) or mass loss (2) were the continuous factors.<br />

In Experiment II, we estimated decomposition rate for each period, each species and for each<br />

topographical situation by applying the following formula :<br />

1<br />

T<br />

[ remaining mass − remaining mass ]<br />

Decomposition rate ( mg / d)<br />

= ⋅<br />

t<br />

t−1<br />

where T is the period between t-1 and t (in days). We did not estimate the exponential decay<br />

constant (as done in experiment I) as the aims of this experiment were to precise for each<br />

period the decomposition rate of each substrate rather than the mean decomposition rate over<br />

all the period of the experiment. We used a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to<br />

compare period and site effects for each species separately and to test differences in litter N<br />

content for each species (proportion of initial N content) after the first winter, summer and<br />

second winter. Finally, a Student’s t-test was used to assess the initial value (=1) litter N<br />

content (in proportion to initial) and that after winter I, summer and winter II. Statistical<br />

analyses were performed using R software (R Development Core Team 2006).<br />

Characteristics<br />

Winter duration (d)<br />

Mean winter soil temperature (°C)<br />

Mean summer soil temperature (°C)<br />

Gravimetric summer soil moisture (gH2O g -1 soil)<br />

Productivity (g m -2 d -1 )<br />

Total biomass (g m -2 )<br />

Late snowmelt<br />

location<br />

240 (12)<br />

-0.15 (0.01)<br />

7.7 (1.55)<br />

0.35 (0.03)<br />

7.23 (0.45)<br />

325.67 (22.04)<br />

Early snowmelt<br />

location<br />

206 (15)<br />

-3.05 (0.45)<br />

7.6 (1.62)<br />

0.42 (0.03)<br />

2.18 (0.14)<br />

185.90 (11.72)<br />

Table 1 Winter duration, soil temperature records and soil moisture are an average of three years records from<br />

the three sites A, B and C within each topographical location (from the end of 2003 to the end of 2006). Values<br />

are the estimated parameter ± standard error except for winter duration where it is standard deviation.<br />

141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!