27.06.2013 Views

The use of photosynthesis inhibitor (DCMU) for in situ ... - IRD

The use of photosynthesis inhibitor (DCMU) for in situ ... - IRD

The use of photosynthesis inhibitor (DCMU) for in situ ... - IRD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

142<br />

vier et al., 1990). <strong>The</strong> bottom was covered by a<br />

mixture <strong>of</strong> seagrass meadow <strong>in</strong>termixed with sea-<br />

weeds. Oxygen fluxes were measured <strong>in</strong><strong>situ</strong>, <strong>in</strong>-<br />

side enclosures, as described by Boucher &<br />

Boucher-Rodoni (1985) and Boucher & Clavier<br />

(1990). <strong>The</strong>e PVC tubes (0.2 m2) were pushed by<br />

SCUBA diver <strong>in</strong>to the sediment, to a m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />

depth <strong>of</strong> 5 cm. <strong>The</strong> tubes were closed with clear<br />

acrylic hemispheres trapp<strong>in</strong>g a known volume,<strong>of</strong><br />

water (54 1 to 63 1 accord<strong>in</strong>g to core <strong>in</strong>sertion <strong>in</strong><br />

the substrate). Submersib1.e pumps, connected to<br />

waterpro<strong>of</strong> 12 V batteries, ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed a 10 1<br />

m<strong>in</strong>- closed circuit flow rate with<strong>in</strong> each enclo-<br />

sure, allow<strong>in</strong>g good mix<strong>in</strong>g without noticeable re-<br />

suspension <strong>of</strong> sediments. A calibrated polaro-<br />

graphic electrode, connected to a dissolved<br />

oxygen meter (YSI, mod. 58 <strong>in</strong> a submersible<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>er), was placed <strong>in</strong> each dome <strong>for</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>-<br />

uous measurements. Incubations were conducted<br />

between 9 and 12 AM, while light <strong>in</strong>tensity was<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g. First dark <strong>in</strong>cubations were conducted<br />

and cont<strong>in</strong>ued 1 h. Each enclosure was covered<br />

with black plastic sheet. To prevent radiation <strong>of</strong><br />

light absorption by black cover which <strong>in</strong>creases<br />

water temperature <strong>in</strong>side the enclosure, an alu-<br />

m<strong>in</strong>ium cover reflect<strong>in</strong>g radiations was put on top<br />

<strong>of</strong> it. Oxygen concentration <strong>in</strong> each chamber was<br />

recorded every lom<strong>in</strong>utes by a SCUBA diver.<br />

Next the covers were lifted, and the clear hemi-<br />

spheres were removed <strong>for</strong> 1 h, then relocked on<br />

the bases <strong>for</strong> light <strong>in</strong>cubations. 60 ml <strong>of</strong> a <strong>DCMU</strong><br />

solution was <strong>in</strong>jected <strong>in</strong> each enclosure. As the<br />

<strong><strong>in</strong>hibitor</strong> must be able to reach its site <strong>of</strong> activity<br />

to be effective (D'Elia, 1978) it was dissolved <strong>in</strong><br />

DMSO (Dimethyl sulfoxide) to facilitate its pas-<br />

sage through plant cellular membranes and its<br />

penetration <strong>in</strong>to the sediment. Dilutions were<br />

made to obta<strong>in</strong> 6 f<strong>in</strong>al concentrations tested <strong>in</strong> the<br />

enclosures 5-10-5, and<br />

mol 1- '). <strong>DCMU</strong> <strong>in</strong>cubations lasted 2 h.<br />

Oxygen concentration <strong>in</strong> each enclosure was<br />

checked every 10 m<strong>in</strong>utes. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cubations,<br />

light energy at the sea-surface was recorded us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a LICOR <strong>in</strong>tegrator. <strong>The</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> available<br />

light reach<strong>in</strong>g the bottom was then calculated<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g an ext<strong>in</strong>ction coefficient <strong>of</strong> water obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

by underwater vertical pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> light.<br />

To check the relationships between night,<br />

<strong>DCMU</strong> and dark oxygen consumptions <strong>in</strong> enclosures,<br />

triplicated night <strong>in</strong>cubations were carried<br />

out between 2 h and 4 h after sunset, followed<br />

next morn<strong>in</strong>g at the same place by dark <strong>in</strong>cubations<br />

and <strong>DCMU</strong> <strong>in</strong>cubations. Concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>DCMU</strong> solution <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> these experiments was<br />

5 w 5 mol 1-l.<br />

At the end <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>cubations, triplicate sediment<br />

syr<strong>in</strong>ge-cores (5.31 cm2, 1 cm depth) were<br />

taken <strong>in</strong>side each enclosure <strong>for</strong> functional chlorophyll<br />

a and phaeopigments contents. Sediment<br />

were deep-freezed and freeze-dried. <strong>The</strong> pigments<br />

were extracted us<strong>in</strong>g 90% acetone <strong>in</strong> a refrigerator<br />

(4 OC) <strong>for</strong> 18 to 24 h (Garrigue & Di Matteo,<br />

1991). Pigments were measured us<strong>in</strong>g the spectrophotometric<br />

method <strong>of</strong> Lorenzen (1967). Macrophytobenthos<br />

was collected <strong>in</strong> each enclosure<br />

by scuba diver and fixed <strong>in</strong> 10% <strong>for</strong>mal<strong>in</strong>. In the<br />

laboratory, species were identified and biomass,<br />

expressed as g m- AFDW, were calculated after<br />

dessication at 60 "C and ash content detenn<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

at 550 "C.<br />

Oxygen fluxes were calculated by l<strong>in</strong>ear regression<br />

7 or 15 measures <strong>of</strong> oxygen content accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to sampl<strong>in</strong>g frequency and <strong>in</strong>cubation duration.<br />

Oxygen consumption, corrected <strong>for</strong> water<br />

volume trapped <strong>in</strong> the enclosure and <strong>for</strong> bottom<br />

surface area, was expressed as mg O, m2 h- '.<br />

<strong>DCMU</strong> efficiency (EI;= oxygen consumption <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>DCMU</strong> <strong>in</strong>cubation/oxygen consumption <strong>in</strong> dark<br />

<strong>in</strong>cubation x 100) represents the percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

respiration <strong>in</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>DCMU</strong> compared to<br />

the dark respiration. Simple l<strong>in</strong>ear regressions<br />

were calculated between <strong>DCMU</strong> efficiency and<br />

other parameters such as light, functional chlorophyll<br />

a and macrophytobenthic biomass. Night,<br />

<strong>DCMU</strong> and dark <strong>in</strong>cubations were compared<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g a Friedman non-parametric test (Siegel,<br />

1956).<br />

Results<br />

<strong>The</strong> light available near the enclosures dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

<strong>DCMU</strong> <strong>in</strong>cubations. varied from 63.5 to<br />

242.6 pmol m-2 s- l. <strong>The</strong> list <strong>of</strong> macrophytes on<br />

.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!