The use of photosynthesis inhibitor (DCMU) for in situ ... - IRD
The use of photosynthesis inhibitor (DCMU) for in situ ... - IRD
The use of photosynthesis inhibitor (DCMU) for in situ ... - IRD
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
142<br />
vier et al., 1990). <strong>The</strong> bottom was covered by a<br />
mixture <strong>of</strong> seagrass meadow <strong>in</strong>termixed with sea-<br />
weeds. Oxygen fluxes were measured <strong>in</strong><strong>situ</strong>, <strong>in</strong>-<br />
side enclosures, as described by Boucher &<br />
Boucher-Rodoni (1985) and Boucher & Clavier<br />
(1990). <strong>The</strong>e PVC tubes (0.2 m2) were pushed by<br />
SCUBA diver <strong>in</strong>to the sediment, to a m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />
depth <strong>of</strong> 5 cm. <strong>The</strong> tubes were closed with clear<br />
acrylic hemispheres trapp<strong>in</strong>g a known volume,<strong>of</strong><br />
water (54 1 to 63 1 accord<strong>in</strong>g to core <strong>in</strong>sertion <strong>in</strong><br />
the substrate). Submersib1.e pumps, connected to<br />
waterpro<strong>of</strong> 12 V batteries, ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed a 10 1<br />
m<strong>in</strong>- closed circuit flow rate with<strong>in</strong> each enclo-<br />
sure, allow<strong>in</strong>g good mix<strong>in</strong>g without noticeable re-<br />
suspension <strong>of</strong> sediments. A calibrated polaro-<br />
graphic electrode, connected to a dissolved<br />
oxygen meter (YSI, mod. 58 <strong>in</strong> a submersible<br />
conta<strong>in</strong>er), was placed <strong>in</strong> each dome <strong>for</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>-<br />
uous measurements. Incubations were conducted<br />
between 9 and 12 AM, while light <strong>in</strong>tensity was<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g. First dark <strong>in</strong>cubations were conducted<br />
and cont<strong>in</strong>ued 1 h. Each enclosure was covered<br />
with black plastic sheet. To prevent radiation <strong>of</strong><br />
light absorption by black cover which <strong>in</strong>creases<br />
water temperature <strong>in</strong>side the enclosure, an alu-<br />
m<strong>in</strong>ium cover reflect<strong>in</strong>g radiations was put on top<br />
<strong>of</strong> it. Oxygen concentration <strong>in</strong> each chamber was<br />
recorded every lom<strong>in</strong>utes by a SCUBA diver.<br />
Next the covers were lifted, and the clear hemi-<br />
spheres were removed <strong>for</strong> 1 h, then relocked on<br />
the bases <strong>for</strong> light <strong>in</strong>cubations. 60 ml <strong>of</strong> a <strong>DCMU</strong><br />
solution was <strong>in</strong>jected <strong>in</strong> each enclosure. As the<br />
<strong><strong>in</strong>hibitor</strong> must be able to reach its site <strong>of</strong> activity<br />
to be effective (D'Elia, 1978) it was dissolved <strong>in</strong><br />
DMSO (Dimethyl sulfoxide) to facilitate its pas-<br />
sage through plant cellular membranes and its<br />
penetration <strong>in</strong>to the sediment. Dilutions were<br />
made to obta<strong>in</strong> 6 f<strong>in</strong>al concentrations tested <strong>in</strong> the<br />
enclosures 5-10-5, and<br />
mol 1- '). <strong>DCMU</strong> <strong>in</strong>cubations lasted 2 h.<br />
Oxygen concentration <strong>in</strong> each enclosure was<br />
checked every 10 m<strong>in</strong>utes. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cubations,<br />
light energy at the sea-surface was recorded us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a LICOR <strong>in</strong>tegrator. <strong>The</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> available<br />
light reach<strong>in</strong>g the bottom was then calculated<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g an ext<strong>in</strong>ction coefficient <strong>of</strong> water obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
by underwater vertical pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> light.<br />
To check the relationships between night,<br />
<strong>DCMU</strong> and dark oxygen consumptions <strong>in</strong> enclosures,<br />
triplicated night <strong>in</strong>cubations were carried<br />
out between 2 h and 4 h after sunset, followed<br />
next morn<strong>in</strong>g at the same place by dark <strong>in</strong>cubations<br />
and <strong>DCMU</strong> <strong>in</strong>cubations. Concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>DCMU</strong> solution <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> these experiments was<br />
5 w 5 mol 1-l.<br />
At the end <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>cubations, triplicate sediment<br />
syr<strong>in</strong>ge-cores (5.31 cm2, 1 cm depth) were<br />
taken <strong>in</strong>side each enclosure <strong>for</strong> functional chlorophyll<br />
a and phaeopigments contents. Sediment<br />
were deep-freezed and freeze-dried. <strong>The</strong> pigments<br />
were extracted us<strong>in</strong>g 90% acetone <strong>in</strong> a refrigerator<br />
(4 OC) <strong>for</strong> 18 to 24 h (Garrigue & Di Matteo,<br />
1991). Pigments were measured us<strong>in</strong>g the spectrophotometric<br />
method <strong>of</strong> Lorenzen (1967). Macrophytobenthos<br />
was collected <strong>in</strong> each enclosure<br />
by scuba diver and fixed <strong>in</strong> 10% <strong>for</strong>mal<strong>in</strong>. In the<br />
laboratory, species were identified and biomass,<br />
expressed as g m- AFDW, were calculated after<br />
dessication at 60 "C and ash content detenn<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
at 550 "C.<br />
Oxygen fluxes were calculated by l<strong>in</strong>ear regression<br />
7 or 15 measures <strong>of</strong> oxygen content accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to sampl<strong>in</strong>g frequency and <strong>in</strong>cubation duration.<br />
Oxygen consumption, corrected <strong>for</strong> water<br />
volume trapped <strong>in</strong> the enclosure and <strong>for</strong> bottom<br />
surface area, was expressed as mg O, m2 h- '.<br />
<strong>DCMU</strong> efficiency (EI;= oxygen consumption <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>DCMU</strong> <strong>in</strong>cubation/oxygen consumption <strong>in</strong> dark<br />
<strong>in</strong>cubation x 100) represents the percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
respiration <strong>in</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>DCMU</strong> compared to<br />
the dark respiration. Simple l<strong>in</strong>ear regressions<br />
were calculated between <strong>DCMU</strong> efficiency and<br />
other parameters such as light, functional chlorophyll<br />
a and macrophytobenthic biomass. Night,<br />
<strong>DCMU</strong> and dark <strong>in</strong>cubations were compared<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g a Friedman non-parametric test (Siegel,<br />
1956).<br />
Results<br />
<strong>The</strong> light available near the enclosures dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
<strong>DCMU</strong> <strong>in</strong>cubations. varied from 63.5 to<br />
242.6 pmol m-2 s- l. <strong>The</strong> list <strong>of</strong> macrophytes on<br />
.