Agenda Reports - Port of Oakland

Blair30
OMAR BENJAMIN
Executive Director
DAVID L. ALEXANDER
Port Attorney
ARNEL ATIENZA
Port Auditor
JOHN T. BETTERTON
Secretary of the Board
ROLL CALL
PORT OF OAKLAND
BOARD OF PORT COMMISSIONERS
530 Water Street Oakland, California 94607
Telephone: (510) 627-1100
Facsimile: (510) 451-5914
TDD/TTY – Dial 711
E-Mail: board@portoakland.com
Website: www.portofoakland.com
AGENDA
Regular Meeting of the Board of Port Commissioners
Thursday February 2, 2012 – 1:00 p.m.
Board Room – 2 nd Floor
PAMELA CALLOWAY
President
GILDA GONZALES
First Vice-President
JAMES W. HEAD
Second Vice-President
MARGARET GORDON
Commissioner
1 st Vice President Gonzales, 2 nd Vice-President Head, Commissioner Gordon,
Commissioner Uno, Commissioner Yee and President Calloway
1. CLOSED SESSION (will be taken out of order - at the end of the meeting)
2. MAJOR PROJECTS
VICTOR UNO
Commissioner
ALAN S. YEE
Commissioner
This segment of the meeting is reserved for action and discussions regarding the status
of Major Projects and issues of special importance.
3. BUDGET & FINANCE
This segment of the meeting is reserved for action or discussion regarding the status of
Budget and Finance issues.
4. STRATEGY & POLICY
This segment of the meeting is reserved for action or discussion on Strategy and Policy
Issues
4.1 Overview of Maritime Division (Maritime)
5. CONSENT ITEMS
Action by the Board under “Consent Items” means that all matters listed below have
been summarized and will be adopted by one motion and appropriate vote. Consent
Items may be removed for further discussion by the Board at the request of any member
of the Board.
AGENDA
1 of 52

6. REMAINING ACTION ITEMS
Remaining Action Items are items not previously addressed in this Agenda that may
require staff presentation and/or discussion and information prior to action by the Board.
7. UPDATES/ANNOUNCEMENTS
The President and/ or Executive Director will report on noteworthy events occurring since
the last Board Meeting.
8. SCHEDULING
OPEN FORUM
This segment of the meeting is reserved for scheduling items for future Agendas and/or
scheduling Special Meetings
The Board will receive public comment on non-agenda items during this time. Please fill
out a speaker card and present it to the Secretary of the Board.
1. CLOSED SESSION (approximately 2:30)
1.1 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - As provided under California
Government Code Section 54956.8:
Property: Former Oakland Army Base and Adjacent Properties
Negotiating Parties: Port of Oakland, Prologis and California Capital Group
Agency Negotiator: Director of Maritime, James Kwon
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment
Property: Berths 20-26 Outer Harbor Terminal Facilities
Negotiating Parties: Port of Oakland and Ports America Outer Harbor Terminals
Agency Negotiator: Director of Maritime, James Kwon
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment
Property: Berths 30-33
Negotiating Parties: Port of Oakland and TransPacific Container Service (TraPac)
Agency Negotiator: Director of Maritime, James Kwon
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment
Property: Berths 33-37
Negotiating Parties: Port of Oakland and Evergreen Marine Corporation (Taiwan)
Ltd
Agency Negotiator: Director of Maritime, James Kwon
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment
Property: Berths 55-56
Negotiating Parties: Port of Oakland and Total Terminals, Inc, LLC (TTI)
2
AGENDA
2 of 52

Agency Negotiator: Director of Maritime, James Kwon
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment
Property: Berths: 57-59
Negotiating Parties: Port of Oakland and SSA Terminals, LLC (SSAT)
Agency Negotiator: Director of Maritime, James Kwon
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment
Property: Berths 60-63
Negotiating Parties: Port of Oakland and Eagle Marine Services (APL Terminal)
Agency Negotiator: Director of Maritime, James Kwon
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment
Property: Berths 67-68
Negotiating Parties: Port of Oakland and SSA Terminals, LLC (SSAT) (Howard
Terminal)
Agency Negotiator: Director of Maritime, James Kwon
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment
Property: Joint Intermodal Terminals
Negotiating Parties: Port of Oakland and Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Agency Negotiator: Director of Maritime, James Kwon
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment
1.2 THREAT TO PUBLIC SERVICES OR FACILITIES
Consultation with: Port Security Officer
CLOSED SESSION REPORT
The Port Attorney or Board Secretary will report on any final actions taken in Closed
Session.
ADJOURNMENT
The next Regular Meeting of the Board will be held on February 16, 2012 at 1:00 p.m. in
the Board Room.
3
AGENDA
3 of 52

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Disability Related Modifications
Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or
services, in order to participate in the meeting, may submit a written request, electronic request, or telephone
request [via the California Relay Service (telephone) for the hearing impaired at (800) 735-2922], to the
Secretary of the Board no later than five working days prior to the scheduled meeting date.
John Betterton, Secretary of the Board
530 Water Street, Oakland, CA 94607
jbetterton@portoakland.com
(510) 627-1696
Language & Interpretive Services
As a grantee of federal aid grant funds from the US Department of Transportation, the Port is responsible for
ensuring equal access to its programs, services, and benefits. To request bilingual interpreters or materials in
alternate formats, please contact the Assistant Secretary of the Board no later than five working days prior to
the scheduled meeting date.
Daria Edgerly, Assistant Secretary of the Board
530 Water Street, Oakland, CA 94607
dedgerly@portoakland.com
(510) 627-1337
Scented Products
Please refrain from wearing scented products to this meeting so attendees who experience chemical sensitivities
may attend.
To Speak on an Agenda Item
You may speak on any item appearing on the Agenda. Please fill out a Speaker’s Card and give it to the Board
Secretary before the start of the meeting or immediately after conclusion of Closed Session. Cards received
after the start of the meeting will be treated as a single request to speak in Open Forum. All speakers will be
allotted a minimum of one minute.
Agenda & Related Materials
Should you have questions or concerns regarding this Agenda, or wish to review any of the Agenda Related
Materials, please contact the Board Secretary, John Betterton, at (510) 627-1696, or visit our web page at
www.portofoakland.com
To receive Port Agendas and Agenda Related Materials by email, please email your request to
jbetterton@portoakland.com
4
AGENDA
4 of 52

MAJOR PROJECTS
MAJOR PROJECTS Tab 2
This segment of the meeting is reserved for action and
discussions regarding the status of Major Projects and
issues of special importance.
5 of 52

BUDGET & FINANCE
BUDGET & FINANCE Tab 3
This segment of the meeting is reserved for action or
discussion regarding the status of Budget and Finance
issues.
6 of 52

STRATEGY & POLICY
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4
This segment of the meeting is reserved for action or
discussion on Strategy and Policy Issues.
7 of 52

Maritime Division
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
1
8 of 52

Today’s Presentation
Division Overview
Structure of Organization and Tenants
Revenue and Expenses
Business Overview
Industry and Port Performance
Market Dynamics
Customer and Commodity Profile
Strategic Initiatives
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
2
9 of 52

Maritime Division Organization Chart
Total FTE Count = 68
December 2011
Manager, Finance and
Administration
Jean Banker
Executive Assistant
Brenda James
Manager, Marketing
and Business
Development
Lawrence Dunnigan
Maritime Director
James Kwon
Chief Wharfinger
Chris Peterson
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
Manager, Harbor
Facilities
Bill Morrison
Staff of 5 FTE’s Staff of 3 FTE’s
Staff of 4 wharfinger
FTE's and 2 security
FTE's
Staff of 48 FTE’s
3
10 of 52

Maritime Revenue And Expenses
FY 03 – FY14
(in 000's)
$156,000
$143,000
$130,000
$117,000
$104,000
$91,000
$78,000
$65,000
$52,000
$39,000
$26,000
$13,000
$0
Source: Port data
FY '03 FY '04 FY '05 FY '06 FY '07 FY '08 FY '09 FY '10 FY '11 FY '12
Bdgt
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
FY '13
Proj.
FY '14
Proj.
Revenue
Expense
4
11 of 52

Berth 20-26 Ports America Terminal
Berth 30-32 TraPac Terminal
Berth 35-38 Ben E. Nutter Terminal
Berth 55-56 Hanjin Terminal
Berth 57-59 Oakland Int’l Container Terminal
Berth 60-63 APL Terminal
Berth 67-68 Charles P. Howard Terminal
2018
2024
2013
2016 2017
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
12 of 52

U.S. Container Volume – at major U.S. container ports
Note: East Coast and Gulf Coast 2011 figures are projected based on January 2011 through November 2011 volume
Source: American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA)
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
6
13 of 52

Oakland Performance on the West Coast
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Source: American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA)
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
14 of 52

2011 Container Volumes
SEA/TAC
3.5m TEU
OAK
2.3m TEU
LA/LB
14m TEU
* Figures are projected based on January 2011 through November 2011 volume
Source: Port authority websites
HOU
1.9m TEU*
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
SAV
2.9m TEU*
CHS
1.4m TEU*
NY/NJ
5.5m TEU*
NOR
1.9m TEU*
8
15 of 52

Approx. USWC Intermodal Volume
SEA/TAC
65% IPI*
2.3m TEU
LA/LB
45% IPI*
6.3m TEU
* Estimated
OAK
20% IPI
500k TEU
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
9
16 of 52

Megaregion Population
8.4 million
14 million 2025 CAGR
16.4m 1.06%
24.3 million
5.7 million
5.5 million
Source: America 2050 / Regional Plan Association
19.7 million
55.5 million
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
10
17 of 52

Expected Rail Growth through 2035
Source: IHS Global Insight
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
18 of 52

MARITIME PROMOTIONAL VIDEO
Link: http://youtu.be/y7skbc4HKs0
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
19 of 52

Oakland’s Trading Partners
Source: Port data
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
20 of 52

Oakland Imports
USWC Import Market Share
2011 Port Cargo Throughput Loaded TEU
Source: Port data
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
Oakland
Seattle
Tacoma
Los Angeles
Long Beach
21 of 52

Major Imports by Value, 2010
Total value of all imports—$21.3 Billion
Commodity $ Millions
1 Machinery 4,505
2 Electrical Equipment 2,312
3 Furniture and Bedding 1,158
4 Beverages 1,098
5 Knit Apparel 965
6 Woven Apparel 873
7 Vehicles 791
8 Toys and Sports Equipment 671
9 Plastic 595
10 Coffee 506
Source: Bureau of Census, U.S. Department of Commerce
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
22 of 52

High Volume Importers through Oakland
1 Canon USA/HP (Electronics)
2 Target (General Dept. Store Merchandise)
3 Cost Plus (Home Furnishings)
4 Gap Inc. (Apparel)
5 JC Penney (General Dept. Store Merchandise)
6 Crate & Barrel (Home Furnishings)
7 Dynacraft (Bicycles)
8 Walgreens (General Dept. Store Merchandise)
9 Diablo Valley Packaging (Wine bottles)
10 Southern Wine & Spirits (Beverages)
Source: PIERS
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
23 of 52

Oakland Exports
USWC Export Market Share
2011 Port Cargo Throughput Loaded TEU
Source: Port data
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
Oakland
Seattle
Tacoma
Los Angeles
Long Beach
24 of 52

Major Exports by Value, 2010
Total value of all exports—$14.8 Billion
Commodity $ Millions
1 Edible Fruit and Nuts 1,802
2 Meat 1,064
3 Machinery 652
4 Beverages 546
5 Inorganic Chemicals/Rare Earth 521
6 Vehicles 472
7 Cereals 420
8 Electrical Machinery 408
9 Optical/Medical Instruments 363
10 Misc Chemical Products 275
Source: Bureau of Census, U.S. Department of Commerce
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
25 of 52

High Volume Exporters through Oakland
1 American Chung Nam (Wastepaper)
2 Globerunners (Ag products)
3 E & J Gallo
4 C G Roxane (Bottled water)
5 Tyson Fresh Meats
6 Olympic Industries (Lumber)
7 ADM Rice
8 Seaboard Foods (Frozen meat)
9 JC Horizon (Wastepaper)
10 EP Minerals (Diatomaceous earth)
Source: PIERS
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
26 of 52

Top Ocean Carriers Serving Oakland
Total 2011 volume
TEU
(thousands) Carrier
Source: Port data
% Growth over
same period 2010
180 APL -3%
172 Evergreen -4%
139 MSC 18%
135 Hanjin 10%
129 Yang Ming 16%
101 Hapag-Lloyd 1%
100 Maersk -24%
95 Horizon 15%
91 Matson 5%
79 Mitsui 10%
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
27 of 52

Major changes in carrier alliances and services
Asia/Europe trade lane…
9/12/2011
Maersk Line (1) announces
daily guaranteed service
between Asia and
Europe
15.9% of global fleet
12/1/2011
MSC (2) and CMA CGM (3)
announce operating
partnership
21.6% of global fleet
(N) global ranking in terms of fleet size
Note: All subsidiaries are consolidated.
Source: AXS-Alphaliner, www.alphaliner.com/top100/index.php
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
12/20/2011
New World and Grand Alliances
announce partnership
APL (7) Hapag Lloyd (5)
MOL (10) OOCL (11)
Hyundai (18) NYK (12)
12/27/2011
17.3% of global fleet CKYH Alliance and Evergreen (6)
announce partnership
COSCO (4) K Line (16)
Yang Ming (15) Hanjin (9)
15.4% of global fleet
21
28 of 52

Strategic Initiatives
• Export Promotion Program
• Incentive for new intermodal rail cargo
• Facilities
• Rail improvements
• Transloading
• Shore power
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
22
29 of 52

Export Promotion Program
Connecting U.S. Exporters to the Global Marketplace….
• Commission study to target export opportunities
• Engage with key trade associations and government agencies
and programs to align export promotion strategies
• Educational events and seminars
• Regional focus events
• Strategic Counsel
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
23
30 of 52

Uncertainty and Opportunity
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
February 2, 2012
Walter Kemmsies, Anne Landstrom
Moffatt & Nichol
31 of 52

Main Points
• Global rebalancing has begun but the recovery hasn’t
• Excesses such as US and Asian trade imbalances are beginning to
reverse
• US is no longer able to prosper without competitive exports
• US share of GDP has declined from 50% in 1980 to 22% in 2011
• Comparative advantage in agriculture, energy and high-end capital
goods
• Oakland is an export gateway to fast growing economies
• Growth will depend on proper planning and execution
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
32 of 52

Why The US Economy Has Been Struggling
Millions of People
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1991
1992
Manufacturing Employment and Goods Trade Deficit
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
• Outsourced jobs were not replaced by export-oriented industries
• Income-constrained households resorted to borrowing to buy homes, cars and
goods
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Recession Manufacturing Employment Goods Trade balance (ex-Oil)
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
2011
$0
-$10
-$20
-$30
-$40
-$50
-$60
Billiosn of Dollars
33 of 52

16%
14%
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
-2%
-4%
-6%
Emerging Markets Have “Driven” The Global Recovery
2000
Developed Economies Are Struggling… … Emerging Markets Are Leading
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
World
Canada
US
Japan
Eurozone
• Emerging markets have helped the global economy recover
16%
14%
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
-2%
-4%
-6%
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
China
India
Brazil
World
34 of 52

60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Growth Has Not Been Driven By Consumers
%
1990
1992
1994
Investment Spending Share of GDP
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
China
India
Mexico
Saudi Arabia
World
Japan
Brazil
United States
Germany
35 of 52

World Economy StrainsTo Recover Without The US
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
1981
US Consumer Spending and Global Real GDP Growth
1983
1985
• The US accounts for 22% of World GDP
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
US Consumer
World GDP
• US consumers account for 70% of US GDP, or 15% of World GDP
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
2011
2013
2015
36 of 52

150%
140%
130%
120%
110%
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
-10%
US Consumers Are Deleveraging
Consumer Debt-To-Income Ratio and Debt Growth Rate
1953
1956
1959
1962
1965
1968
1971
1974
1977
1980
1983
1986
1989
1992
1995
1998
2001
2004
Recession Growth of Debt Debt-to-Income
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
2007
2010
2013
2016
• It will take some time for the debt-to-income ratio to become sustainable
37 of 52

160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
1970
1972
18 Mos
1974
1976
15 Mos
1978
Employment Recovery Trends
Non-farm Employment Since 1970
1980
26 Mos
10 Mos
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
30 Mos
46 Mos
95 Mos?
• Since 1980 recovery in employment to pre-recession levels has lengthened
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
Recession Employment (millions)
2004
2006
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
38 of 52

60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
The World’s Population Is Aging
Proportion of Population Above 55 Years of Age
1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
• These trends underlie major global and US trends
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
Japan
Europe
China
Canada
US
Brazil
Mexico
India
39 of 52

$20
$0
-$20
-$40
-$60
-$80
1992
Billions
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
Unsustainable Trade Deficit
US Trade Balance Components: 1992 -2010
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Goods Balance Services Balance Oil Balance
2008
2009
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
2010
2011
2012
45% of the
trade
deficit is
due to
petroleum
imports
• Including oil, the goods deficit is 4.8x the services surplus, 2.8x excluding oil
• Increased import dependency is unavoidable – the US needs to export more
40 of 52

US Export Candidates
• Bulk commodities and specialized capital goods (project cargo) fit the
profile of US comparative advantages
• Relative to faster growing Emerging Markets, the US has
• A lower cost of capital, but a higher cost of labor
• Relative abundance of scare resources such as water
• More advanced biotechnology
• More reliable quality control and surveillance of compliance
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
• Strong Emerging Market demand for bulk is expected to continue as these
economies continue to grow and migrate from rural areas to industrializing
urban areas
• Grains and oilseeds
• Meat
• Biofuels – wood pellets
• Gas and Coal
• Strong bulk demand also means strong demand for capital equipment –
energy, construction, agricultural
• US has to develop infrastructure to compete in the global market place
41 of 52

Soy Yield trends In Large Producer Economies
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
Soy Hectogram Yields Per Hectare
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
• US has the highest rate of agricultural productivity in the world
USA
Brazil
Argentina
Canada
World
China
Indonesia
• Nations with fastest growing consumption have lowest productivity
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
India
42 of 52

Oakland’s Share of Food Product Exports
(Including Meats, Fresh & Frozen)
• Oakland share of
Nevada, Utah, Colorado
and Idaho meat product
exports is significant
• Good opportunities exist
for increased market
share in key meat
producing states of
Nebraska, Iowa and
Kansas
• Export flows are
consistent with rail and
road transportation
coverage
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
43 of 52

Food Manufacturing Production Areas by County
• California’s central
valley is key
producer of high
value, specialty crops
which are ideal for
export
• Part of the process
we are going through
involves identifying
Oakland’s immediate
hinterland as well as
their opportunity
areas
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
44 of 52

STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
Oakland’s Share of Certain Food and Beverage Export
Commodities is Very High (Tree Nuts, Wine)- Opportunities
to Increase in Other Commodities (Citrus, Soybeans)
CALIFORNIA COLORADO IDAHO NEVADA UTAH WYOMING At Oakland Tonnage
Export Food and Beverages 38% 39% 7% 64% 80% 39% 1,249,483
WINES 96% 98% 97% 11% 100% 0% 532,463
BERRIES (EXCEPT STRAWBERRIES) 67% 46% 6% 100% 95% 0% 1,138
CITRUS FRUITS (EXCEPT ORANGES) 29% 43% 5% 71% 51% 0% 12,230
CORN 12% 49% 46% 0% 41% 0% 13,687
COTTON 11% 12% 6% 9% 41% 0% 62,263
DRY PEAS AND BEANS 27% 19% 0% 16% 49% 0% 12,075
GRAPES 33% 64% 24% 87% 91% 0% 21,344
HAY, ALFALFA HAY, AND CLOVER 6% 28% 15% 100% 85% 0% 57,623
NURSERY PRODUCTS AND TREES 68% 44% 1% 79% 65% 0% 1,631
OILSEEDS (EXCEPT SOYBEAN) 50% 40% 2% 70% 83% 0% 9,003
ORANGES 50% 82% 45% 100% 96% 0% 91,276
OTHER GRAINS 35% 88% 47% 0% 93% 0% 1,392
OTHER MISCELLANEOUS AGRICULTURAL PROCUCTS 20% 6% 0% 26% 86% 12% 8,131
OTHER NONCITRUS FRUITS 66% 74% 4% 64% 92% 1% 70,378
OTHER VEGETABLES (EXCEPT POTATOES) AND
MELONS 68% 78% 5% 84% 93% 0% 77,818
SOYBEANS 20% 33% 7% 66% 53% 0% 103,355
STRAWBERRIES 100% 99% 86% 100% 99% 0% 1,707
TREE NUTS 87% 88% 23% 76% 97% 77% 701,555
45 of 52

STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
There are more Opportunities to Increase Oakland
Imports and More Leakage to Southern California
At Oakland
Tonnage
WINES CALIFORNIA COLORADO IDAHO NEVADA UTAH WYOMING 208,100
OTHER COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 13% 23% 3% 39% 49% 0% 13,741
OTHER ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS 10% 17% 2% 31% 40% 0% 11,727
OTHER MEASURING AND CONTROLLING DEVICES 27% 46% 72% 37% 75% 0% 10,556
SEMICONDUCTORS AND RELATED DEVICES 39% 62% 28% 71% 79% 0% 14,647
DRIED AND DEHYDRATED FOODS 50% 90% 0% 82% 100% 6% 83,459
FROZEN FRUITS, JUICES AND VEGETABLES 24% 2% 14% 4% 31% 34% 29,482
FRUITS AND VEGETABLES PRESERVED 19% 2% 11% 4% 21% 65% 118,635
MEAT PRODUCTS (EXCEPT POULTRY) 19% 5% 27% 15% 43% 0% 52,049
MILLED RICE AND BY-PRODUCTS 30% 50% 0% 5% 77% 0% 59,326
OTHER HOUSEHOLD TEXTILE PRODUCTS 17% 47% 12% 51% 62% 20% 147,431
MOTOR VEHICLE PARTS, NESOI 4% 14% 6% 16% 15% 4% 109,432
MOTORCYCLES, BICYCLES, AND PARTS 39% 66% 42% 52% 67% 0% 72,954
46 of 52

Main Points
• Global rebalancing has begun but the recovery hasn’t
• Excesses such as US and Asian trade imbalances are beginning to
reverse
• US is no longer able to prosper without competitive exports
• US share of GDP has declined from 50% in 1980 to 22% in 2011
• Comparative advantage in agriculture, energy and high-end capital
goods
• Oakland is an export gateway to fast growing economies
• Growth will depend on proper planning and execution
STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
47 of 52

STRATEGY & POLICY Tab 4.1
Summary
• Oakland has significant opportunities to increase exports
provided there are enough imports to provide empty
equipment
• Exports from the Midwest are a key target area and planned
infrastructure development adjacent to the port on the
Oakland Army Base could play a big part in attracting some of
these commodities
• As we go through the next steps of the project, additional
opportunities will surface and that will help in moving towards
the next phase of building the strategic plan
48 of 52

CONSENT ITEMS
CONSENT ITEMS Tab 5
Action by the Board under “Consent Items” means that all
matters listed below have been summarized, and are
considered to be perfunctory in nature, and will be adopted
by one motion and appropriate vote. Consent Items may be
removed for further discussion by the Board at the request of
any member of the Board.
49 of 52

REMAINING ACTION ITEMS
REMAINING ACTION ITEMS Tab 6
Remaining Action Items are items not previously addressed
in this Agenda that may require staff presentation and/or
discussion and information prior to action by the Board.
50 of 52

UPDATES & ANNOUNCEMENTS Tab 7
UPDATES & ANNOUNCEMENTS
The President and / or Executive Director will report on
noteworthy events occurring since the last Board Meeting.
51 of 52

SCHEDULING
SCHEDULING Tab 8
This segment of the meeting is reserved for scheduling
items for future Agendas and/or scheduling Special
Meetings.
52 of 52