Annual Report 2003-2004
Annual Report 2003-2004
Annual Report 2003-2004
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Governments. There are many infrastructure projects, which have been started<br />
but are lying incomplete for want of resources. Even though there is an urgent<br />
need of creating adequate employment opportunities in rural areas through<br />
development of infrastructure, there had been virtually no institutional<br />
arrangements for financing rural infrastructure.<br />
Against this background, the Government of India in the Budget of<br />
1995-1996 announced, the scheme for setting up of Rural Infrastructure<br />
Development Fund (RIDF) to be operationalised by NABARD for financing of<br />
the ongoing as well as the new infrastructure projects.<br />
RIDF is being utilized for providing financial assistance to the State<br />
Government for completing/taking of new infrastructure projects in rural areas.<br />
The criteria for the selection of a project are:<br />
the State Government should accord priority to the project;<br />
the project should be such that it could be completed within two<br />
to three years.<br />
2. Projects, which can be sanctioned under RIDF<br />
(a) Irrigation Sector : Medium, Minor and Major Irrigation Projects<br />
(b) Flood Control Projects<br />
(c) Agriculture and Allied Activities<br />
(d) Social Sectors (Support to rural water supply system, infrastructure<br />
for PHC and educational institutions, e-governance)<br />
(e) Rural Connectivity (roads and bridges)<br />
3. Procedure for Sanction of Projects<br />
The Departments concerned formulate the project proposals. Project<br />
Screening Committee (PSC), now renamed as High Power Committee (HPC),<br />
headed by the Development Commissioner, examines the proposals along with<br />
the estimates and feasibility report. After examination, the HPC recommends<br />
the same to regional office of NABARD at Bhubaneswar for sanction. The<br />
Consultant, after field visit submits the appraisal report indicating whether the<br />
project is recommended or not. The main aspects seen while appraising the<br />
project are :<br />
(a) Whether the project is technically feasible, financially and<br />
economically viable.<br />
(b) Whether the State has the required machinery to execute the<br />
project within a short period.<br />
After receipt of appraisal report of the Consultant and his<br />
recommendation, the project proposals are sent to the Head Office of the