28.06.2013 Views

Luc Racaut PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Luc Racaut PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Luc Racaut PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Wars <strong>of</strong> Religion conjure up the image <strong>of</strong> an inquisitor rather than a 'prophet <strong>of</strong> the<br />

apocalypse'.<br />

Crouzet was successful in putting eschatological anguish on the<br />

historiographical map <strong>of</strong> the French Wars <strong>of</strong> Religion, but whether it was as central<br />

as he makes it is a matter for serious consideration. Our own fears <strong>of</strong> a global<br />

ecological disaster on the eve <strong>of</strong> a new millennium should convince us that no<br />

historical argument can be built on the specificity <strong>of</strong> any period <strong>of</strong> history in respects<br />

<strong>of</strong> millenarianism. One could argue that apocalypticism has been part <strong>of</strong> human<br />

culture ever since men realised they were mortal: it is a lot easier to contemplate the<br />

end <strong>of</strong> all things than it is to contemplate one's own.<br />

From the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> the authors I have outlined above, Crouzet is<br />

problematic since he specifically argues against a rationalization <strong>of</strong> religious<br />

violence. No rational explanation can be found (according to Crouzet) since those<br />

who took part in the massacres felt vindicated by God and motivated by the belief<br />

that the end was at hand. The work <strong>of</strong> Natalie Davis is built on the premise that<br />

religion is basically a social phenomenon and that religious rituals are ultimately<br />

concerned with this world. According to this school <strong>of</strong> thought, religion is<br />

inseparable from the community <strong>of</strong> believers and violence can be seen as justifiable<br />

in the defence <strong>of</strong> its boundaries from the pollution <strong>of</strong> heresy. 21 Crouzet specifically<br />

rejects this Durkheimian school <strong>of</strong> thought and the utilitarianism and functionalism<br />

associated with it, as negating the specificity <strong>of</strong> religious violence which is conferred<br />

by its otherworldliness. Another major point <strong>of</strong> disagreement lies in the interpretation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the ritual aspects <strong>of</strong> religious violence which, to Crouzet, are prophetic. According<br />

to Crouzet, the failure to acknowledge the specificity <strong>of</strong> religious violence<br />

invalidates the work <strong>of</strong> his predecessors, like Janine Garrisson and Natalie Davis:<br />

Ii n'y aurait donc ni primitivisme, ni fonctionalisme, dans le<br />

systeme d'une violence qui, en consequence, ne pourrait étre<br />

analysee que dans le champ specifique du Sacre du XVIe siècle.<br />

21 N. Z. Davis, 'The sacred & the body social in Sixteenth-Century Lyon', P&P, 90<br />

(1981), 40-70, p. 63; Culture and Society, p. 157.<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!