Aggregate versus Disaggregate Data in Measuring School Quality
Aggregate versus Disaggregate Data in Measuring School Quality
Aggregate versus Disaggregate Data in Measuring School Quality
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Notes<br />
1 Although the aggregate estimate is theoretically unbiased, a test for bias similar to Hanushek<br />
and Taylor’s was performed. Hanushek and Taylor f<strong>in</strong>d that aggregation biases downward the<br />
estimated school effects. They reestimate the value-added equation enter<strong>in</strong>g an estimate of<br />
school quality as a fixed effect. Bias of the school effect estimate is measured by deviations of<br />
the coefficient of school quality from one. In our Monte Carlo study, rather than an estimate, the<br />
true school effects can be used, and therefore, a generated regressor problem is avoided. No<br />
evidence of bias is found and thus Hanushek and Taylor’s f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of bias is apparently due to a<br />
bias <strong>in</strong> the construction of their test rather than due to aggregation.<br />
19