28.06.2013 Views

Spin Connection Resonance in the Bedini Machine - Alpha Institute ...

Spin Connection Resonance in the Bedini Machine - Alpha Institute ...

Spin Connection Resonance in the Bedini Machine - Alpha Institute ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22 1 <strong>Sp<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Connection</strong> <strong>Resonance</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bed<strong>in</strong>i Mach<strong>in</strong>e<br />

a spike pulse of one percent of <strong>the</strong> time period. Fig. 1.9 shows <strong>the</strong> result for<br />

a constant value of f2.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> zero cross<strong>in</strong>g of Ar is essential for <strong>the</strong> resonances, we have modified<br />

Eq. (1.85) by add<strong>in</strong>g a constant value of 0.001, thus displac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> curve<br />

of Fig. 1.3 by this value from zero. The result (Fig. 1.10) shows a far smaller<br />

resonance structure <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that resonances are very sensitive to <strong>the</strong> form<br />

of Ar via ω0.<br />

Next we <strong>in</strong>spect <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> maximum amplitude. In Fig. 1.11<br />

<strong>the</strong> maximum difference over <strong>the</strong> first six time periods is plotted <strong>in</strong> dependence<br />

of <strong>the</strong> time frequency. Obviously <strong>the</strong> resonance is most dramatic for low<br />

frequencies. In <strong>the</strong> next figure (Fig. 1.12) <strong>the</strong> maximum amplitude difference<br />

was recorded over a constant simulated time of 0.1 sec. To avoid numerical<br />

<strong>in</strong>stabilities <strong>in</strong>ferred by <strong>the</strong> calculation we used a modified Ar <strong>in</strong>put value as<br />

discussed for Fig. 1.10 (shifted by 0.1 upwards, no zero cross<strong>in</strong>g). Solutions<br />

are stable <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> low frequency range but <strong>the</strong>re are w<strong>in</strong>dows of unstability for<br />

higher frequencies. We argue that <strong>the</strong> differential equation (1.78) can show<br />

chaotic behaviour and must be carefully evaluated.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally we present <strong>the</strong> amount of transferred energy <strong>in</strong>tegrated over time.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Eq. (1.76) this is proportional to<br />

t<br />

u(t) =<br />

0<br />

A 2 ϕ(t ′ )<br />

ω dt′ . (1.88)<br />

This term is represented <strong>in</strong> Fig. 1.13. S<strong>in</strong>ce Aϕ crosses zero at <strong>the</strong> resonances<br />

(remember that <strong>the</strong> modulus is shown <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> figures), a considerable amount<br />

of energy is pushed back to <strong>the</strong> vacuum after hav<strong>in</strong>g been transferred to <strong>the</strong><br />

system, but <strong>the</strong>re is enough energy left after each resonance peak so that <strong>the</strong><br />

energy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> system rises considerably.<br />

As a last item <strong>in</strong> this section let us consider <strong>the</strong> radius dependence of <strong>the</strong><br />

fields which can not be determ<strong>in</strong>ed from Eqs. (1.77–1.79) as discussed above.<br />

Therefore let’s start from Eqs. (1.77) and (1.80):<br />

Är +˙ω0Ar + ω0 ˙<br />

Ar = −f1<br />

<br />

Ar<br />

˙ + ω0 + r ∂ω0<br />

<br />

∂Ar ˙ ∂Ar<br />

Ar + r + rω0<br />

∂r ∂r ∂r<br />

(1.89)<br />

= 0 (1.90)<br />

We will make an ansatz for Ar and compute <strong>the</strong> solution for ω0 which is<br />

compatible with this. We choose<br />

Ar = Ce −αr−iβt<br />

(1.91)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!