29.06.2013 Views

Depec-Bradesco Economic Highlights - Economia em Dia

Depec-Bradesco Economic Highlights - Economia em Dia

Depec-Bradesco Economic Highlights - Economia em Dia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Depec</strong>-Bradeso <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Highlights</strong><br />

the projected infl ation in their model. Hypothetically,<br />

let’s imagine a situation where infl ation is in the center<br />

of the target at the start of a year and that, solely<br />

on account of an external shock, both infl ation and<br />

infl ation expectations point to a higher-than-target<br />

value. In this case, it makes no sense to assume<br />

that there are two vectors pushing infl ation up: one<br />

from the external shock which leads to an increase<br />

in current infl ation and another from an “exogenous”<br />

deterioration in expectations. Expectations have<br />

worsened fundamentally because of the shock and<br />

not on account of any other factor. Therefore, to say<br />

8,5%<br />

6,5%<br />

4,5%<br />

2,5%<br />

5,2%<br />

7,2%<br />

8,1%<br />

5,5%<br />

4,4%<br />

3,0%<br />

mar/04<br />

mai/04<br />

jul/04<br />

set/04<br />

nov/04<br />

jan/05<br />

mar/05<br />

mai/05<br />

jul/05<br />

set/05<br />

nov/05<br />

jan/06<br />

mar/06<br />

mai/06<br />

jul/06<br />

set/06<br />

nov/06<br />

jan/07<br />

mar/07<br />

mai/07<br />

jul/07<br />

set/07<br />

nov/07<br />

jan/08<br />

mar/08<br />

mai/08<br />

jul/08<br />

set/08<br />

nov/08<br />

jan/09<br />

mar/09<br />

mai/09<br />

jul/09<br />

set/09<br />

nov/09<br />

jan/10<br />

mar/10<br />

mai/10<br />

jul/10<br />

set/10<br />

nov/10<br />

jan/11<br />

With regard to the infl ation cores, our diagnosis is that<br />

the acceleration seen over the last few months is the<br />

lagged refl ex of last year’s growth in economic activity,<br />

particularly in the labor market. It’s like taking a look in<br />

the rear-view mirror: the infl ation that we are experiencing<br />

right now is the result of the marked level of economic<br />

activity that was registered in previous quarters. As<br />

5,6%<br />

5,1%<br />

that the deterioration in infl ation expectations would<br />

be an additional risk factor is wrong, and is the same<br />

as counting the same shock twice. As a result, in our<br />

opinion, the deterioration in the infl ation expectations<br />

for 2011 is suffering to a marked degree from this<br />

“double counting” effect due to the pronounced<br />

correlation between infl ation expectations and current<br />

infl ation, infl uenced by the commodities shock. In<br />

addition to this pronounced correlation with current<br />

infl ation, as can be observed in the following graph,<br />

the predictive power of infl ation expectations at times<br />

of external shocks se<strong>em</strong>s even smaller.<br />

6,4%<br />

IPCA<br />

Expectations 12 months forward<br />

4,0%<br />

5,3%<br />

4,5%<br />

5,9%<br />

5,5%<br />

IPCA infl ation<br />

and infl ation<br />

expectations 12<br />

months ahead,<br />

synchronized 2004<br />

- 2011<br />

Source: IBGE, BC<br />

Produced by: BRADESCO<br />

can be noted in the following table, among the main<br />

determinants of the underlying infl ation, the it<strong>em</strong>s that<br />

most draw attention are the earnings of households and<br />

the labor market. What is expected regarding this aspect<br />

is that the Central Bank will adjust its instruments in order<br />

to bring economic growth to below potential, and in our<br />

opinion, this is what is currently being done.<br />

July 2008 February 2011<br />

Expectation for the current year 6.50% 5.79%<br />

Change in 6 months (bps) 213 88<br />

Expectation for the next year 4.98% 4.78%<br />

Change in 6 months (bps) 94 28<br />

Infl ation for the previous year 4.46% 5.91%<br />

Gap (6 month average) 2.14% 0.52%<br />

Commodities in reais (variation over 6 months) 17.68% 16.29%<br />

Un<strong>em</strong>ployment Rate (6 month average) 7.93% 6.46%<br />

Real Earnings (annualized 6 month variation) 4.42% 8.19%<br />

Domestic Absorption (annualized 2 quarters variation) 9.93% 7.35%<br />

Even before the start of the monetary tightening cycle<br />

that is currently in progress, economic activity had<br />

already been giving signs that growth, in the margin, is<br />

below potential and the fi gures for the labor market point<br />

unmistakably in this direction, as can be observed in the<br />

graphs below. Growth in engag<strong>em</strong>ent and in earnings<br />

dropped from a fi gure close to 1.0% at the end of last<br />

Comparison between<br />

indicators which are<br />

signifi cant for infl ation<br />

during monetary tightening<br />

cycles<br />

2008 - 2011<br />

Source: IBGE, BC<br />

Produced by: BRADESCO<br />

year to a slightly negative fi gure at the start of this<br />

year, while engag<strong>em</strong>ent recently slowed down from a<br />

monthly rate of slightly more than 1.0% to a fi gure of<br />

less than 0.5%. Brazilian industrial production has been<br />

showing stability since the second last quarter of last<br />

year, retail sector sales are showing the fi rst signs of<br />

deceleration and apparent consumption of machinery<br />

DEPEC<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!