29.06.2013 Views

Review of the Food-borne Zoonoses Research ... - ARCHIVE: Defra

Review of the Food-borne Zoonoses Research ... - ARCHIVE: Defra

Review of the Food-borne Zoonoses Research ... - ARCHIVE: Defra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Contents<br />

Section A – Introduction...................................................................................... 2<br />

1. Introduction................................................................................................ 3<br />

2. <strong>Defra</strong>‘s aim and strategic priorities............................................................<br />

3. The Animal Health and Welfare Strategy..................................................<br />

4. The FBZ research programme..................................................................<br />

4.1 Samonella..................................................................................<br />

4.2 VTEC O157..............................................................................<br />

4.3 Campylobacter.........................................................................<br />

4.4 Cryptosporidium.......................................................................<br />

5. Costs <strong>of</strong> FBZ research............................................................................<br />

6. Aims <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> FBZ research review............................................................<br />

7. Terms <strong>of</strong> reference for external referees.................................................<br />

Section B – <strong>Review</strong> Summaries........................................................................<br />

1. Salmonella...............................................................................................<br />

2. Campylobacter.........................................................................................<br />

3. E. coli.......................................................................................................<br />

4. O<strong>the</strong>r zoonotic pathogens <strong>of</strong> interest.......................................................<br />

Annex 1 – Index <strong>of</strong> projects reviewed..................................................................<br />

Annex 2 – Project abstracts and project review summaries................................<br />

Annex3 – List <strong>of</strong> external reviewers....................................................................<br />

Annex 4 – Assessment form templates...............................................................<br />

Annex 5 – <strong>Review</strong> Timetable................................................................................<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

8<br />

10<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

13<br />

15<br />

16<br />

21<br />

25<br />

27<br />

29<br />

37<br />

105<br />

107<br />

112<br />

2


Section A – Introduction<br />

3


<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Food</strong>-<strong>borne</strong> <strong>Zoonoses</strong> (FBZ) <strong>Research</strong><br />

Programme 2003 – 2007.<br />

(26 th to 27 th November 2007).<br />

1. Introduction<br />

<strong>Defra</strong> is a major funder <strong>of</strong> research, spending in <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> £150 million per year. The<br />

research commissioned supports <strong>Defra</strong> in meeting its overarching aim and strategic<br />

priorities (see section 2). Approximately £40 million <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> annual budget is spent on<br />

animal health and welfare research, which also serves to support <strong>the</strong> goals <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Animal<br />

Health and Welfare Strategy for Great Britain (see section 3). In general, <strong>the</strong> results<br />

generated from research are used to ensure existing <strong>Defra</strong> policies are based on sound<br />

evidence, to identify <strong>the</strong> need to develop new policy, and to support <strong>Defra</strong>‘s regulatory<br />

roles.<br />

As part <strong>of</strong> an ongoing process <strong>of</strong> evaluation, <strong>Defra</strong> research programmes are subject to a<br />

formal review process every three to five years.<br />

The remit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Food</strong>-<strong>borne</strong> <strong>Zoonoses</strong> (FBZ) research programme covers a number <strong>of</strong><br />

specific diseases. With this in mind, <strong>the</strong> review process not only considers <strong>the</strong> merits <strong>of</strong><br />

individual research projects, but also considers <strong>the</strong> balance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> programme against its<br />

objectives by examining whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re has been an appropriate prioritisation <strong>of</strong> resource<br />

to meet most effectively <strong>the</strong> objectives <strong>of</strong> disease prevention and control. In addition,<br />

given <strong>the</strong> continuing threat food<strong>borne</strong> diseases pose to <strong>the</strong> UK, <strong>the</strong> review will address<br />

how <strong>the</strong> research programme could best meet future evidence needs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Department<br />

and if <strong>the</strong>re is sufficient resource allocated to do so.<br />

In consideration <strong>of</strong> resource management it is important to recognise opportunities for<br />

working in partnership, an underpinning element <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Animal Health and Welfare<br />

Strategy, and identifying areas where cost and responsibility sharing with stakeholders<br />

are appropriate.<br />

In broadening <strong>the</strong> scope and mechanisms by which <strong>the</strong> R&D programme may be<br />

managed, it is also necessary to identify research and evidence that may be needed on<br />

top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current portfolio. Studies, for example, that better inform <strong>the</strong> Department and<br />

4


stakeholders on economics, social science and behaviour change, with respect to<br />

disease management, may be included by such a process.<br />

2. <strong>Defra</strong>’s aim and strategic priorities<br />

At <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> this review <strong>Defra</strong>'s overarching aim was sustainable development, which is<br />

defined as ‘development which enables all people throughout <strong>the</strong> world to satisfy <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

basic needs and enjoy a better quality <strong>of</strong> life without compromising <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong><br />

future generations.‘<br />

Under this overarching aim, five strategic priorities were identified, including:<br />

1. Climate change and energy: Making a full contribution, domestically and<br />

internationally, to addressing <strong>the</strong> long-term threats presented by climate change and<br />

unsustainable energy use, and to ensure adequate mitigation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> consequences<br />

which are already unavoidable.<br />

2. Sustainable consumption and production: Breaking <strong>the</strong> link between economic growth<br />

and environmental degradation and resource use through promoting and enabling<br />

more sustainable patterns <strong>of</strong> consumption and production.<br />

3. Protecting <strong>the</strong> countryside and natural resource protection: Creating a robust policy<br />

framework and evidence base in order to promote <strong>the</strong> sustainable use and<br />

enhancement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country's natural heritage and ecosystems.<br />

4. Sustainable rural communities: Encouraging sustainable regeneration in<br />

disadvantaged rural areas, promoting social inclusion and reducing deprivation.<br />

Ensuring higher quality, more accessible public services to rural communities.<br />

5. Sustainable farming and food, including animal health and welfare: Helping to create<br />

a sustainable food and farming supply chain serving <strong>the</strong> market and <strong>the</strong> environment;<br />

putting in place systems to reduce risks <strong>of</strong> animal diseases, and being ready to<br />

control <strong>the</strong>m when <strong>the</strong>y occur.<br />

In addition to this, <strong>Defra</strong> has an ongoing responsibility for emergency preparedness,<br />

including planning for emergencies in animal and plant diseases, flooding, food supply,<br />

water supply and dealing with <strong>the</strong> consequences <strong>of</strong> a chemical, biological, radiological or<br />

nuclear incident.<br />

5


Plans for taking forward <strong>the</strong>se priorities are described in more detail in <strong>Defra</strong>‘s five year<br />

strategy (Delivering <strong>the</strong> Essentials <strong>of</strong> Life), which was published in 2004. However it<br />

should be noted that <strong>Defra</strong> was undergoing a strategy refresh focusing on <strong>the</strong> mission <strong>of</strong><br />

‗one planet living‘ at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> this review.<br />

3. The Animal Health and Welfare Strategy for Great Britain<br />

The Animal Health and Welfare Strategy for Great Britain, was published in 2004, with<br />

<strong>the</strong> overall aim <strong>of</strong> ‗developing a new partnership to make a lasting and continuous<br />

improvement in <strong>the</strong> health and welfare <strong>of</strong> kept animals, while protecting society, <strong>the</strong><br />

economy, and <strong>the</strong> environment from <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> animal diseases‘. To bring about this<br />

aim, <strong>the</strong> following strategic outcomes were identified:<br />

1. Working in partnership<br />

2. Promoting <strong>the</strong> benefits <strong>of</strong> animal health and welfare, particularly emphasising<br />

prevention is better than cure<br />

3. Ensuring a clearer understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> costs and benefits <strong>of</strong> animal health and<br />

welfare practices<br />

4. Understanding and accepting roles and responsibilities<br />

5. Delivering and enforcing animal health and welfare standards effectively.<br />

4. The FBZ research programme<br />

The FBZ research programme forms part <strong>of</strong> a wider body <strong>of</strong> research on animal health<br />

and welfare. This research portfolio is managed on behalf <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Chief Veterinary Officer<br />

and is closely associated with <strong>the</strong> FBZ policy division to which it provides a substantial<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> evidence base. From <strong>the</strong> current Animal Health and Welfare research<br />

portfolio, approximately 6% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> budget is allocated to <strong>the</strong> FBZ research programme<br />

(Figure 1).<br />

6


Figure 1. Spend on Animal Health and Welfare research against policy area for<br />

2007/2008<br />

To note: approx. £3million pa <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total budget are sourced directly from policy programmes, including<br />

£2million <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> TB spend and £1million <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Veterinary Training and <strong>Research</strong> Initiative (VTRI) spend.<br />

The FBZ research programme covers research projects on non-notifiable zoonotic<br />

diseases. <strong>Zoonoses</strong> are defined by <strong>the</strong> World Health Organisation (OIE) as "Diseases<br />

and infections which are naturally transmitted between vertebrate animals and man".<br />

Between 2002 and 2007, <strong>the</strong> programme has included research on Salmonella species;<br />

E. coli O157; Campylobacter species; Yersinia enterocolitica; Cryptosporidium species;<br />

and Bovine neosporosis. Key <strong>the</strong>mes within diseases include diagnostics, intervention<br />

strategies, epidemiology, pathogenesis, and source identification. It should be noted that<br />

though Salmonella is non-notifiable disease, it is ‗reportable‘. This means that should it<br />

be detected in samples tested in a laboratory, this must be reported to <strong>the</strong> local<br />

Veterinary Laboratories Agency (VLA) laboratory (In England and Wales), and to <strong>the</strong><br />

local Divisional Veterinary Manager in Scotland.<br />

The rationale for funding research on FBZ is set out in <strong>the</strong> policy and scientific objectives<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> research defined below:<br />

7


Policy Objectives<br />

The key policy objectives are as follows:<br />

help minimise <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> zoonotic infections being transmitted to man;<br />

reduce <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> medicinal products for <strong>the</strong> control <strong>of</strong> zoonotic infections and<br />

<strong>the</strong>reby minimise any risk to <strong>the</strong> consumer from food and <strong>the</strong> environment arising<br />

from <strong>the</strong>ir residues<br />

reduce <strong>the</strong> threat to animal welfare and economic performance posed by <strong>the</strong>se<br />

diseases and any long term disadvantages <strong>of</strong> current treatments for <strong>the</strong>se<br />

diseases;<br />

To maintain nuclei <strong>of</strong> expertise at <strong>the</strong> strategic level on a range <strong>of</strong> zoonotically<br />

important diseases to promote food safety<br />

To encourage projects co-funded with industry and <strong>the</strong> European Union which<br />

meet <strong>the</strong> objectives above.<br />

Government intervenes in animal health and welfare for four reasons where <strong>the</strong> market<br />

on its own cannot deliver some or all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> objectives:<br />

To protect human health<br />

To protect and promote <strong>the</strong> welfare <strong>of</strong> animals<br />

To protect <strong>the</strong> interests <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wider economy, environment and society<br />

International Trade<br />

Government will use <strong>the</strong>se reasons as <strong>the</strong> starting point for any considerations as to<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r intervention should take place. It is <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> Government to balance <strong>the</strong>se<br />

interests and resolve <strong>the</strong>m to <strong>the</strong> greatest advantage <strong>of</strong> all those affected.<br />

Scientific Objectives<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> scientific objectives are apparent which will support <strong>the</strong> policy objectives set<br />

out above and <strong>the</strong> overall rationale. These are not intended to be comprehensive nor<br />

mutually exclusive.<br />

8


The scientific objectives are as follows:<br />

To identify <strong>the</strong> potential hazards posed to human health by animal diseases and<br />

human diseases which are believed to have an animal reservoir, and identify<br />

measures that can be taken to reduce <strong>the</strong> risk from <strong>the</strong>se hazards.<br />

To maintain nuclei <strong>of</strong> expertise that can be used to promote sustainable genetic<br />

and immunological approaches to zoonotic disease control.<br />

To increase knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> epidemiology and pathogenesis <strong>of</strong> food<strong>borne</strong><br />

zoonoses using molecular genetic approaches with <strong>the</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> improving diagnosis<br />

and disease control by sustainable approaches which do not include<br />

chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy.<br />

To maintain nuclei <strong>of</strong> expertise at <strong>the</strong> strategic level on a range <strong>of</strong> important<br />

zoonotic diseases. These should act as foci for research co-funded with industry<br />

with <strong>the</strong> aim minimising <strong>the</strong> microbiological hazards <strong>of</strong> UK agriculture and<br />

promoting <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> safe food.<br />

4.1 Salmonella<br />

Salmonellae have been recognised as important pathogens for many years. S. Enteritidis<br />

and S. Typhimurium have accounted for <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> human salmonellosis<br />

since <strong>the</strong> 1980s and have consistently been <strong>the</strong> most commonly implicated pathogens in<br />

general outbreaks <strong>of</strong> food<strong>borne</strong> disease. Under-ascertainment <strong>of</strong> infectious intestinal<br />

disease (IID) is well recognised, and <strong>the</strong> true population burden is greater than that given<br />

by national surveillance. For every report to national surveillance for Salmonella spp.<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are approximately three cases in <strong>the</strong> community. In 2005, 12,652 laboratory<br />

confirmed cases <strong>of</strong> salmonellosis were reported in <strong>the</strong> UK, (Figure 2) a decrease <strong>of</strong> 14%<br />

on <strong>the</strong> 14,729 confirmed cases recorded in 2004. The total number <strong>of</strong> reports in 2005 are<br />

approximately a third <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> number recorded in 1997 1 .<br />

The salmonellae are a group <strong>of</strong> organisms with a diverse range <strong>of</strong> host species including<br />

mammals, birds, reptiles and fish. Investigations have shown that infection can be<br />

acquired through <strong>the</strong> consumption <strong>of</strong> a large variety <strong>of</strong> different foods if <strong>the</strong>y become<br />

contaminated, as well as through direct contact with a wide range <strong>of</strong> animal species and<br />

9


Figure 2. Laboratory reports <strong>of</strong> Salmonella in people, UK 1983 – 2005.<br />

contact with faecally contaminated environments. The serotyping and phage typing<br />

schemes that have been developed have enabled microbiologists to differentiate<br />

between thousands <strong>of</strong> Salmonella strains with widely varying natural histories, which<br />

helps to identify <strong>the</strong> source <strong>of</strong> infections 1 .<br />

Epidemiological and microbiological investigations have demonstrated that poultry and<br />

eggs are <strong>the</strong> main source for <strong>the</strong> most important disease-causing strains <strong>of</strong> S. Enteritidis.<br />

Outbreaks <strong>of</strong> infection are most commonly associated with <strong>the</strong> consumption <strong>of</strong> poultry<br />

and eggs. In 2005, <strong>the</strong>re was a marked decline in <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> outbreaks <strong>of</strong> S.<br />

Enteritidis (non PT4) associated with catering establishments in England and Wales,<br />

which followed a decline in <strong>the</strong> purchasing <strong>of</strong> non-UK eggs by <strong>the</strong> catering sector 1 .<br />

Strains <strong>of</strong> S. Typhimurium have been found to be associated with <strong>the</strong> consumption <strong>of</strong> a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> foods including beef, dairy produce, pork, lamb, chicken and turkey. A range <strong>of</strong><br />

vehicles <strong>of</strong> infection has been found to be associated with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r serotypes <strong>of</strong><br />

Salmonella. Most are <strong>of</strong> animal origin, however a wide variety <strong>of</strong> spices, herbs and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

produce have also been implicated in general outbreaks <strong>of</strong> infection 1 .<br />

1 Data sourced from <strong>Zoonoses</strong> Report UK – available via<br />

http://defraweb/animalh/diseases/zoonoses/zoonoses_reports/zoonoses2005.pdf<br />

10


4.2 VTEC O157<br />

Vero cytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) have emerged in <strong>the</strong> last 25 years as a<br />

group <strong>of</strong> pathogens <strong>of</strong> worldwide importance. The number <strong>of</strong> laboratory confirmed cases<br />

<strong>of</strong> VTEC O157 infection in <strong>the</strong> UK rose by 25% from 926 in 2004 to 1155 in 2005.<br />

However, overall <strong>the</strong> general trend has been stable in <strong>the</strong> last few years (see Figure 3) 1 .<br />

Figure 3. Laboratory reports <strong>of</strong> VTEC 0157 in people, UK 1987 – 2005.<br />

The main reservoir <strong>of</strong> VTEC O157 in livestock is ruminants, particularly cattle, sheep and<br />

goats but <strong>the</strong> organism has been found in faeces from a wide range <strong>of</strong> animals including<br />

horses, pigs, dogs, domestic geese and wild rabbits. Information from outbreak<br />

surveillance in <strong>the</strong> UK demonstrates that VTEC O157 infection can be transmitted via<br />

consumption <strong>of</strong> contaminated food or water; person to person spread; contact with<br />

livestock; and environmental exposure 1 .<br />

4.3 Campylobacter<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> laboratory confirmed cases reached a peak <strong>of</strong> 65,209 cases in 1998.<br />

Since <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>re has been a general decline in disease incidence. However between<br />

2004 and 2005 <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> reported cases <strong>of</strong> campylobacteriosis in <strong>the</strong> UK again rose<br />

from 47,466 to 49,803 (see figure 4) 1 .<br />

1 Data sourced from <strong>Zoonoses</strong> Report UK – available via<br />

http://defraweb/animalh/diseases/zoonoses/zoonoses_reports/zoonoses2005.pdf<br />

11


Figure 4. Laboratory reports <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter in <strong>the</strong> UK 1992 – 2005.<br />

Most cases <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter infection are thought to be sporadic and <strong>the</strong> routes <strong>of</strong><br />

transmission remain unclear. Poultry meat may be an important vehicle <strong>of</strong> infection and<br />

surveys have shown that a significant proportion <strong>of</strong> raw poultry meat for human<br />

consumption is contaminated. Evidence from experimental studies suggests that<br />

Campylobacter has a low infectious dose and thus cross-contamination <strong>of</strong> ready-to eat<br />

foods by raw meat may be an important route <strong>of</strong> infection. The roles <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r animal<br />

products, o<strong>the</strong>r foods, water and non-food<strong>borne</strong> exposures are still under investigation 1 .<br />

4.4 Cryptosporidium<br />

Cryptosporidia are protozoan parasites with a widespread distribution in farm and wild<br />

animals. The parasite can cause clinical disease (cryptosporidiosis) in animals, usually<br />

neo-natal diarrhoea, although subclinical infection is common particularly in lambs.<br />

Typing for Cryptosporidium parvum is now becoming available and has enabled<br />

improved identification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> different species. C. hominis (previously C. parvum<br />

genotype 1) is normally only recovered from humans although <strong>the</strong>re have been<br />

exceptional reports <strong>of</strong> isolates reported from animals. C. parvum (previously C. parvum<br />

genotype 2) is found in both animals and humans 1 .<br />

In <strong>the</strong> UK in 2005 <strong>the</strong>re were 5,288 cases reported compared with 4,197 cases in 2004<br />

(see figure 5) 1 .<br />

1 Data sourced from <strong>Zoonoses</strong> Report UK – available via<br />

http://defraweb/animalh/diseases/zoonoses/zoonoses_reports/zoonoses2005.pdf<br />

12


Figure 5. Laboratory reports <strong>of</strong> Cryptosporidium in <strong>the</strong> UK, 2005.<br />

5. Costs <strong>of</strong> FBZ research<br />

The total <strong>Defra</strong> funding for research on <strong>Food</strong><strong>borne</strong> <strong>Zoonoses</strong> in 2007/08 was £2.6 million<br />

and was allocated as shown in Figure 6. A fur<strong>the</strong>r £2million per annum is being invested<br />

(from <strong>Defra</strong>) in <strong>the</strong> Veterinary Training and <strong>Research</strong> initiative (VTRI), which although<br />

focused on <strong>the</strong> development and training to support veterinary research, consists <strong>of</strong><br />

many elements that are complementary to <strong>the</strong> FBZ research programme. The VTRI<br />

projects are reviewed under a separate process and will not be subject to scrutiny within<br />

this review.<br />

Figure 6. Allocation <strong>of</strong> funding within <strong>the</strong> FBZ research programme 2007/08<br />

13


6. Aims <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> FBZ research review<br />

The current and completed FBZ research projects from 2002 to 2007 were evaluated as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> review (see Annex A).<br />

The FBZ research programme was reviewed by a panel consisting <strong>of</strong> external referees<br />

and <strong>Defra</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficials and <strong>the</strong> aims were:<br />

to evaluate completed and current research projects in relation to:<br />

o <strong>the</strong>ir scientific quality<br />

o <strong>the</strong>ir usefulness to policy and contribution to <strong>the</strong> evidence base<br />

o <strong>the</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> overall objectives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> FBZ research programme<br />

to assess <strong>the</strong> size, scope and balance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current FBZ research programme in<br />

relation to current policy needs<br />

to consider <strong>the</strong> future direction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> FBZ research programme and identify future<br />

priorities, taking into account <strong>the</strong> size, scope and balance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current research<br />

programme, as well as research funded in <strong>the</strong> field by o<strong>the</strong>r sponsors<br />

7. Terms <strong>of</strong> reference for external referees<br />

On <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> project information provided prior to <strong>the</strong> review meeting, as well as<br />

presentations and discussions at <strong>the</strong> review meeting, <strong>the</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> reference are:<br />

To consider <strong>the</strong> relevance and appropriateness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> research for funding by <strong>Defra</strong><br />

To consider <strong>the</strong> soundness and appropriateness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scientific approaches used<br />

and if <strong>the</strong>y are being taken forward competently<br />

To examine <strong>the</strong> progress being made towards <strong>the</strong> objectives and <strong>the</strong> likelihood <strong>of</strong><br />

success<br />

To consider if <strong>the</strong> findings from <strong>the</strong> research are based on sound evidence<br />

To consider <strong>the</strong> collaboration with o<strong>the</strong>r institutes and universities both nationally and<br />

internationally<br />

14


To assess <strong>the</strong> effectiveness with which appropriate opportunities for technology<br />

transfer are being addressed, and in particular, whe<strong>the</strong>r reports and publications are<br />

being delivered to an appropriate standard<br />

To consider <strong>the</strong> value for money <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> research<br />

To consider <strong>the</strong> future scientific direction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work<br />

To prepare a written report (i.e. assessment form for external referees) on <strong>the</strong><br />

research area and to comment verbally at <strong>the</strong> review meeting in November 2007 (if<br />

attending)<br />

To confirm that any views expressed are entirely objective<br />

15


Section B – <strong>Review</strong> Summaries<br />

16


1. Salmonella <strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

1.1 Success <strong>of</strong> research in providing value to <strong>Defra</strong><br />

Salmonellosis is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most important bacterial diseases <strong>of</strong> man and animals<br />

worldwide and has important implications for human and animal health and welfare. At<br />

present Salmonella Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium account for <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> cases <strong>of</strong><br />

human salmonellosis.<br />

<strong>Defra</strong> is responsible for <strong>the</strong> protection <strong>of</strong> animal health and has a major role in protecting<br />

human health from animal diseases. The panel felt that it was <strong>the</strong>refore appropriate for<br />

<strong>Defra</strong> to fund work in this area and agreed that <strong>Defra</strong>‘s portfolio <strong>of</strong> Salmonella research<br />

has contributed significantly to <strong>the</strong> Salmonella evidence base, to developing scientific<br />

methodology and maintaining essential expertise.<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> Molecular Methods<br />

DNA techniques have been employed to develop molecular subtyping methods for<br />

Salmonella. This has helped to improve strain identification and comparison <strong>of</strong><br />

Salmonella species.<br />

<strong>Research</strong> is currently in place to develop rapid screening tools to improve <strong>the</strong> detection<br />

and control <strong>of</strong> Salmonella, by providing an early warning system for <strong>the</strong> emergence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

next epidemic Salmonella strain or clone.<br />

Poultry <strong>Research</strong> – Broilers<br />

Valuable research has been undertaken investigating bacterial and host genes involved<br />

in Salmonella colonisation in poultry. This has contributed to our understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

genetic basis <strong>of</strong> host resistance to colonisation which could be exploited using genetic<br />

selection.<br />

Commissioned research aimed at assisting <strong>the</strong> turkey industry with reducing Salmonella<br />

and antimicrobial resistance is at an early stage. It was thought that this had <strong>the</strong> potential<br />

be extremely important to <strong>Defra</strong> in providing evidence on <strong>the</strong> occurrence and<br />

17


epidemiology <strong>of</strong> Salmonella and antimicrobial-resistant E. coli. This information is a<br />

necessary requirement for <strong>the</strong> formulation <strong>of</strong> future monitoring and control policies.<br />

Poultry <strong>Research</strong> – Layers<br />

The research on non-specific and innate resistance to Salmonella infection was<br />

considered to have advanced <strong>the</strong> understanding <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fundamental<br />

mechanisms for establishment and clearance <strong>of</strong> Salmonella infections in chickens and<br />

pigs. This research has, <strong>the</strong>refore, contributed to <strong>the</strong> knowledge in area <strong>of</strong> innate<br />

responses to infection and <strong>the</strong> exploitation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se responses to control infection.<br />

Although at an early stage, commissioned research investigating <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong><br />

immunosuppression at <strong>the</strong> point-<strong>of</strong>-lay on salmonella infection and immunity in laying<br />

hens will provide information at a particularly important period in <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

laying hen, at a time when it is known that Salmonella breakdowns tend to occur.<br />

The series <strong>of</strong> epidemiological studies investigating Salmonella contamination in layer<br />

flocks and eggs has been fundamental in assisting development <strong>of</strong> policy both within UK<br />

and within EU, as it has allowed <strong>Defra</strong> to negotiate a UK position based on best available<br />

science. This ongoing research has enabled <strong>Defra</strong> to build better relationships with <strong>the</strong><br />

industry, assisting both subsequent research and also policy development involving<br />

partnership with industry.<br />

Work is also in place to help manage <strong>the</strong> challenges to <strong>the</strong> egg industry posed by new S.<br />

Enteritidis phage types and it is hoped that this work will eventually lead to improved<br />

vaccines to control potential new strains.<br />

Porcine and Bovine <strong>Research</strong><br />

A study <strong>of</strong> multiple-resistant S. Typhimurium DT 104 undertaken in cattle has provided a<br />

unique body <strong>of</strong> evidence on <strong>the</strong> epidemiology <strong>of</strong> Salmonella infection in cattle herds in<br />

Great Britain. It was an opportunity to study <strong>the</strong> dynamics <strong>of</strong> an epidemic Salmonella<br />

serotype in <strong>the</strong> national cattle population.<br />

<strong>Research</strong> has provided useful information on <strong>the</strong> molecular basis <strong>of</strong> Salmonella<br />

pathogenesis in cattle and pigs and has <strong>the</strong> potential to assist with control through<br />

providing data for <strong>the</strong> rational development <strong>of</strong> live vaccines. A series <strong>of</strong> epidemiological<br />

studies <strong>of</strong> Salmonella infection in pigs has contributed to <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> diagnostic<br />

tests, sampling methodology and in improving methods <strong>of</strong> control.<br />

18


In summary, <strong>the</strong> pig research was considered to be worthwhile and should clarify many<br />

questions concerning salmonellosis in pigs, from which future control strategies can be<br />

determined.<br />

1.2 Issues and areas <strong>of</strong> concern relating to this research<br />

Concerns were raised with one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> research projects which generated no publications.<br />

From <strong>the</strong> outset, contractors should consider how best to communicate research findings<br />

to <strong>Defra</strong> and <strong>the</strong> wider scientific community.<br />

It was noted that <strong>Defra</strong> should scrutinise proposals particularly carefully when <strong>the</strong>re may<br />

be a sole supplier <strong>of</strong> materials that are essential to <strong>the</strong> success <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project.<br />

1.3 Gaps in <strong>Research</strong><br />

Development <strong>of</strong> Molecular Methods<br />

The improvement <strong>of</strong> typing methods is an important research area, particularly since<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is a need to have a better understanding <strong>of</strong> Salmonella epidemiology. The industry<br />

needs highly reproducible, rapid, cheap methods which are specific for Salmonella and<br />

reasonably sensitive. There is a need for a more rapid but highly specific test for<br />

confirmation <strong>of</strong> Salmonella <strong>of</strong> public health significance.<br />

Poultry <strong>Research</strong> - Layers<br />

EU legislative changes will impact on <strong>the</strong> industry and <strong>Defra</strong> needs <strong>the</strong> UK negotiating<br />

stance to be based on sound science. It is likely that <strong>the</strong>re will be a need for fur<strong>the</strong>r work<br />

to address some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new issues that will arise out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> legislation implementation.<br />

Salmonella Enteritidis remains <strong>the</strong> most important Salmonella <strong>of</strong> public health<br />

significance in <strong>the</strong> poultry industry. Historically outbreaks in poultry in UK have been<br />

associated with S. Enteritidis phage types 4, 6 and 7 which are related. It is important to<br />

<strong>the</strong> UK poultry industry to establish if <strong>the</strong> vaccines currently available are effective<br />

against o<strong>the</strong>r S. Enteritidis phage types prevalent in <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> Europe. The work would<br />

contribute significantly to <strong>the</strong> evidence base and should result in improved methods <strong>of</strong><br />

control.<br />

19


There is a need to objectively assess all practical interventions which might obviate <strong>the</strong><br />

need for heat treatment <strong>of</strong> eggs as, for many producers, this will not be economically<br />

feasible.<br />

It was also thought useful to develop a cost-effective screening test to distinguish<br />

between flocks which are highly, moderately and minimally contaminated.<br />

If <strong>the</strong> on-going research on avian immunological response during <strong>the</strong> point-<strong>of</strong>-lay period<br />

proves successful <strong>the</strong>re will be a need to understand how <strong>the</strong> information can be utilised<br />

in <strong>the</strong> field to improve salmonella control. It was also suggested that it might be useful to<br />

investigate changes at <strong>the</strong> end-<strong>of</strong>-lay when Salmonella breakdowns are also known to<br />

occur.<br />

Porcine <strong>Research</strong><br />

Control <strong>of</strong> Salmonella in pigs is highly complex and UK pig industry is significantly<br />

different from that in o<strong>the</strong>r member states, with a higher percentage <strong>of</strong> outdoor units and<br />

a broad breeder base in <strong>the</strong> UK. <strong>Research</strong> from o<strong>the</strong>r EU member states or third<br />

countries is <strong>the</strong>refore not always directly applicable. Salmonella control in UK for this<br />

sector remains problematic. There appear to be regional differences that need to be<br />

understood better.<br />

The lack <strong>of</strong> a satisfactory vaccine for use in pigs is an issue, however <strong>the</strong>re may well be<br />

sufficient information at this point for pharmaceutical companies to make a satisfactory<br />

vaccine. It is more a case <strong>of</strong> companies being persuaded that <strong>the</strong>re is a sufficient market<br />

for a vaccine.<br />

Bovine <strong>Research</strong><br />

With regards to cattle it is probably reasonable to believe that a new epidemic <strong>of</strong><br />

Salmonella in cattle will occur at some time in <strong>the</strong> future as <strong>the</strong>re have been a series <strong>of</strong><br />

epidemics in <strong>the</strong> past. Should such an epidemic occur, research will need to be put in<br />

place at an early stage to establish <strong>the</strong> epidemiology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> disease in order to attempt to<br />

reduce <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> epidemic. <strong>Research</strong> is underway to try to assist with <strong>the</strong> prediction<br />

<strong>of</strong> a new epidemic.<br />

20


Currently <strong>the</strong>re is more concern about Salmonella controls for o<strong>the</strong>r species and, despite<br />

<strong>the</strong> high level <strong>of</strong> herd breakdowns, it is not clear that <strong>the</strong>y are resulting in real public<br />

health significance.<br />

1.4 Balance <strong>of</strong> funding in this FBZ programme.<br />

It was felt that it would not be appropriate to cut back on Salmonella research while <strong>the</strong><br />

new EU regulations are being implemented.<br />

21


2. Campylobacter review summary<br />

2.1 Success <strong>of</strong> research in providing value to <strong>Defra</strong><br />

Campylobacter species is <strong>the</strong> most common cause <strong>of</strong> bacterial food-<strong>borne</strong> illness in <strong>the</strong><br />

UK. While <strong>the</strong>re are a number <strong>of</strong> routes by which humans are exposed to<br />

Campylobacter, poultry meat is thought to be an important source <strong>of</strong> infection. A<br />

reduction in Campylobacter colonisation <strong>of</strong> poultry flocks is <strong>the</strong>refore a <strong>Defra</strong> priority, and<br />

a substantial portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Animal Health and Welfare research budget has been<br />

directed to this subject.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> commissioning some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> research covered by this review, <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong><br />

poultry as a source for human campylobacteriosis was still uncertain. This uncertainty<br />

stemmed from a poor understanding <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter sp. and <strong>the</strong>ir epidemiology.<br />

<strong>Research</strong> within this programme has increased our understanding <strong>of</strong> this organism<br />

significantly, and revealed <strong>the</strong> difficulties in typing due to <strong>the</strong> genetic instability <strong>of</strong><br />

campylobacters. An MLST method for Campylobacter sp., developed under <strong>Defra</strong><br />

funding, is <strong>of</strong> fundamental importance in providing a robust method for typing this genus.<br />

In addition, <strong>the</strong> MLST method has been adopted by clinical laboratories for use in typing<br />

human isolates, and <strong>the</strong> tool has been adopted at international level demonstrating <strong>the</strong><br />

value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work performed.<br />

A project investigating carriage <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter spp. in pet dogs indicated that <strong>the</strong><br />

common causes <strong>of</strong> human infection, C. jejuni and C. coli, are not <strong>of</strong>ten isolated from<br />

dogs. Veterinarians are regularly asked about pets as sources <strong>of</strong> human infection and<br />

this project was valuable in providing reassurance on this issue.<br />

Investment in research into <strong>the</strong> bacterium and its survival, persistence and epidemiology<br />

in poultry flocks has increased <strong>the</strong> knowledge base <strong>of</strong> this human pathogen which, it is<br />

anticipated, will be <strong>of</strong> value in developing effective controls for this organism.<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> research projects within this programme have investigated non-biosecurity<br />

interventions including, competitive exclusion, vaccination, maternal antibodies and<br />

innate immunity. This has been a difficult area <strong>of</strong> research, however <strong>the</strong> widespread<br />

22


nature <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter, and lack <strong>of</strong> success in controlling this organism through<br />

biosecurity, highlights <strong>the</strong> necessity for progressing o<strong>the</strong>r potential approaches to control.<br />

2.2 Issues and areas <strong>of</strong> concern relating to this research<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> concerns were voiced by <strong>the</strong> reviewers in relation to <strong>the</strong> Campylobacter<br />

research programme:<br />

1. It was felt that teams working on Campylobacter research <strong>of</strong>ten did so in isolation<br />

from each o<strong>the</strong>r. Increasing collaboration, and bringing <strong>the</strong> complementary<br />

expertise <strong>of</strong> different teams toge<strong>the</strong>r would be beneficial to progressing <strong>the</strong><br />

science in this area.<br />

2. At present <strong>Defra</strong>, FSA and BBSRC each hold separate reviews <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir research<br />

programmes. While each are kept abreast <strong>of</strong> work being funded by <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs and<br />

<strong>the</strong>re was not a problem in duplication <strong>of</strong> effort, it was suggested that a more<br />

joined up approach to research reviews would be useful in identifying gaps in<br />

research.<br />

3. <strong>Review</strong>ers highlighted <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> contractors alerting <strong>Defra</strong> when project<br />

objectives are found to no longer be appropriate. This enables an alternative<br />

project plan to be agreed so that <strong>the</strong> contract still delivers information that is <strong>of</strong><br />

value to <strong>Defra</strong>.<br />

4. <strong>Research</strong> has shown a small seasonal effect on Campylobacter colonisation in<br />

chickens in <strong>the</strong> UK. It is <strong>the</strong>refore important to ensure any research into<br />

interventions is properly designed to prevent conclusions being drawn on natural<br />

fluctuations in Campylobacter levels.<br />

5. For vaccination or competitive exclusion to be <strong>of</strong> significant use in <strong>the</strong> future it is<br />

important to build links with industry to take work to <strong>the</strong> next stage and test<br />

findings under field conditions.<br />

2.3 Gaps in research<br />

While <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> MLST for Campylobacter sp. was acknowledged to be <strong>of</strong><br />

fundamental importance, reviewers agreed that it was not <strong>the</strong> perfect epidemiological tool<br />

23


for this organism. <strong>Research</strong> within <strong>the</strong> programme had shown that a variety <strong>of</strong> typing<br />

methods may be used depending on <strong>the</strong> question being asked. A good routine tool for<br />

typing Campylobacter sp. would <strong>the</strong>refore be <strong>of</strong> value to enable source attribution <strong>of</strong><br />

infection. Developments in genetic chips may be particularly useful in typing<br />

Campylobacter sp. in <strong>the</strong> future. Due to <strong>the</strong> unpredictable nature <strong>of</strong> where genetic<br />

change occurs, a chip carrying a large number <strong>of</strong> genetic elements and <strong>the</strong>ir variants<br />

may be <strong>the</strong> key to typing this unstable genus.<br />

A lot <strong>of</strong> resources have been invested in developing <strong>the</strong> MLST database. It is vital that<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> this database now takes place to identify <strong>the</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter that<br />

are responsible for human infection. It is also important to ascertain whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />

database has been populated in an un-biased manner, or whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re are sample<br />

types that are under-represented and need to be included.<br />

The interrelationships between strains found in poultry units, processing units, <strong>the</strong><br />

environment, wild life and domestic animals is unknown. This information would help to<br />

address <strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> contribution <strong>of</strong> contamination in <strong>the</strong> abattoir, food processing<br />

environment, and household strains to human disease.<br />

<strong>Review</strong>ers noted that <strong>the</strong>re are still many fundamental questions that need to be<br />

addressed by basic research, such as <strong>the</strong> relationship between strain type and virulence<br />

potential. Basic research is also needed to fur<strong>the</strong>r understand <strong>the</strong> interaction between<br />

genomics and physiology i.e. <strong>the</strong> behaviour <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> organism in vitro and in vivo. This work<br />

was considered to be more appropriate for funding by <strong>the</strong> BBSRC or Wellcome Trust.<br />

Fundamental questions also remain unanswered in relation to <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> maternal<br />

antibodies in chick immunity. Despite <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> success in identifying suitable vaccine<br />

candidates to-date, <strong>the</strong> reviewers felt that pursuing <strong>the</strong> vaccination approach was<br />

worthwhile. They noted, however, <strong>the</strong> need to expand expertise on <strong>Defra</strong>-funded projects<br />

to include immunologists and industry representatives with vaccine expertise. LINK<br />

projects, where <strong>Defra</strong> and private companies share <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> research, were thought to<br />

be ideal for progressing research in this area.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> flaws in some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> research undertaken is <strong>the</strong> uncertainty over whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

enough colonies are examined to be confident that a single Campylobacter strain is<br />

present ra<strong>the</strong>r than multiple strains. <strong>Review</strong>ers suggested that a project examining large<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> isolates would be useful in determining whe<strong>the</strong>r co-infection with multiple<br />

24


strains is common, and how many colonies should be selected to be reasonably<br />

confident <strong>of</strong> only one Campylobacter strain being present.<br />

A question that intrigues many researchers, <strong>the</strong> answer to which could be valuable in<br />

control <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter, is why some poultry farms are consistently negative for <strong>the</strong><br />

organism. If <strong>the</strong> factors involved in a farm remaining uninfected could be elucidated this<br />

may reveal potential control strategies.<br />

Biosecurity measures that have been successful in controlling Salmonella infection on<br />

poultry farms and o<strong>the</strong>r diseases have not had <strong>the</strong> same success in reducing<br />

Campylobacter infection. <strong>Review</strong>ers suggested that a critical review <strong>of</strong> on-farm<br />

interventions to control Campylobacter would be useful in identifying which biosecurity<br />

measures were most successful. It was noted that a critical review <strong>of</strong> both biosecurity<br />

and non-biosecurity interventions in <strong>the</strong> control <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter was in <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong><br />

being commissioned by FSA and <strong>Defra</strong>.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r studies suggested were:<br />

studies to determine most effective biosecurity measures e.g. is dipping boots<br />

more or less effective than changing <strong>the</strong>m?<br />

investigations on stocking densities, general health and welfare and<br />

Campylobacter colonisation<br />

studies to determine <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> on farm control measures with campylobacters<br />

present in humans<br />

2.4 Balance <strong>of</strong> funding in this research area<br />

<strong>Review</strong>ers felt that with <strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> new EU legislation on Salmonella control,<br />

Salmonella research should take priority for research in <strong>the</strong> short-term. With Salmonella<br />

levels being successfully reduced, more <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> budget should be targeted towards<br />

Campylobacter control in <strong>the</strong> longer-term. The need to co-ordinate <strong>Defra</strong>-funded<br />

research on Campylobacter with work supported by o<strong>the</strong>r funding bodies was also<br />

highlighted<br />

25


3. E. coli review summary<br />

3.1 Success <strong>of</strong> research in providing value to <strong>Defra</strong><br />

In recent years, research projects including those supported by <strong>Defra</strong> have contributed<br />

greatly to a better understanding <strong>of</strong> E. coli O157 infections in animals and man. The<br />

series <strong>of</strong> <strong>Defra</strong> funded projects has led to significant progress being made in several<br />

areas, from gaining better knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> infection in cattle and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

livestock species through to <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> possible approaches to <strong>the</strong> control <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

infection in cattle.<br />

3.2 Issues and areas <strong>of</strong> concern relating to this research<br />

A wide range <strong>of</strong> research projects were reviewed and while some areas <strong>of</strong> research had<br />

not been particularly productive <strong>the</strong>re were o<strong>the</strong>r areas where excellent progress had<br />

been made. <strong>Research</strong> related to <strong>the</strong> predilection site for E. coli O157 colonisation in<br />

cattle and <strong>the</strong> progress towards developing control methods based on this knowledge<br />

were rated highly. It was noted that VTECs o<strong>the</strong>r than E. coli O157 also are a disease<br />

risk and <strong>the</strong> research programme should not focus entirely on E. coli O157.<br />

3.3 Gaps in research<br />

A better understanding is still required <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> epidemiology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> infection particularly as<br />

it is now clear that infection can be acquired from environmental and o<strong>the</strong>r sources in<br />

addition to <strong>the</strong> well described route through eating infected meat products. An on-going<br />

review project funded by <strong>the</strong> FSA on past and current research on verocytotoxin<br />

producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) in relation to public health protection is expected to<br />

provide some useful indications <strong>of</strong> research gaps and requirements.<br />

It was considered that fur<strong>the</strong>r research on vaccination as a possible approach to control<br />

was justified and it was noted that <strong>the</strong>re is a current LINK project looking at vaccination<br />

strategies in cattle. Although research has shown that o<strong>the</strong>r livestock species apart from<br />

cattle can be colonised to a varying extent by E. coli O157, it was suggested that a better<br />

26


understanding is needed <strong>of</strong> why some animals such as pigs and poultry are not acting as<br />

a significant source <strong>of</strong> infection.<br />

The research had contributed to <strong>the</strong> formulation <strong>of</strong> practical strategies that could reduce<br />

<strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> carriage <strong>of</strong> VTEC O157 in cattle but <strong>the</strong>re is a need to determine how <strong>the</strong>se<br />

findings can be more effectively disseminated to <strong>the</strong> farming industry.<br />

3.4 Balance <strong>of</strong> funding in this research area<br />

Compared to <strong>the</strong> Salmonella and Campylobacter research programmes, <strong>the</strong> VTEC<br />

programme is relatively small. It was considered that this is appropriate and that <strong>the</strong> on-<br />

going studies on possible control methods were justified. It was recommended that <strong>the</strong><br />

focus on control should not be limited to VTEC but that a broader approach to improved<br />

biosecurity on farm should be considered. It was noted that such a project was currently<br />

under consideration for funding<br />

27


4. O<strong>the</strong>r zoonotic pathogens <strong>of</strong> interest review summary<br />

4.1 Success <strong>of</strong> research in providing value to <strong>Defra</strong><br />

<strong>Defra</strong> has funded research projects on Cryptosporidium, Yersinia and Neospora. Each<br />

project was thought to have improved understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> zoonotic risk from <strong>the</strong>se<br />

pathogens and <strong>the</strong>refore funding in this area has been <strong>of</strong> value to <strong>Defra</strong>.<br />

Studies <strong>of</strong> Cryptosporidium infection confirmed that pets are rarely a source <strong>of</strong> infection<br />

for humans but that some human infections could be attributed to farm animals.<br />

Challenge experiments demonstrated for <strong>the</strong> first time that C. hominis could infect a wide<br />

range <strong>of</strong> farm species, including calves, lambs piglets and poultry. The research on<br />

Neospora did not provide evidence that <strong>the</strong>re is a zoonotic risk from cattle. Yersinia<br />

enterocolitica strains present in livestock were shown to be a potential threat to human<br />

health.<br />

4.2 Issues and areas <strong>of</strong> concern relating to this research<br />

There were no generic issues <strong>of</strong> concern in this research area. The Yersinia research<br />

had generated valuable publications, but it was considered disappointing that more had<br />

not been published from <strong>the</strong> Cryptosporidium work.<br />

4.3 Gaps in research<br />

Although additional work could always be carried out, no significant gaps were identified<br />

in <strong>the</strong> research.<br />

It was felt that <strong>the</strong> research agenda in this area should largely be driven by policy needs.<br />

There was potential for more work on Cryptosporidium sp. and Yersinia sp. There was<br />

not a strong case for <strong>Defra</strong> to fund fur<strong>the</strong>r studies on Neospora sp. but a case could be<br />

made for working in partnership with industry on Neospora as an endemic disease.<br />

Surveillance or prevalence studies would be useful to determine <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong><br />

diseases such as Q fever, toxoplasmosis or Lyme disease in UK livestock. <strong>Research</strong> to<br />

28


investigate <strong>the</strong> vulnerability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK to infections brought in by exotic pets should also<br />

be considered.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r related areas <strong>of</strong> work in <strong>the</strong> future might also benefit research on zoonoses. For<br />

example, work on detection by array-based technologies would help identify new<br />

pathogens and strains emerging in <strong>the</strong> UK.<br />

4.4 Balance <strong>of</strong> funding in this research area<br />

It was considered necessary for <strong>Defra</strong> to monitor this area and to have a budget<br />

available to enable a rapid response to emerging needs as assessed by <strong>Defra</strong> and <strong>the</strong><br />

various specialist advisory groups.<br />

29


Annex 1 – Projects <strong>Review</strong>ed<br />

30


Project<br />

Code<br />

Title<br />

LK0665 Improving gut health and nutrient capture <strong>of</strong> broiler<br />

chickens through selection for innate immune<br />

function<br />

LK0666<br />

OZ0135<br />

OZ0138C<br />

Vaccination strategies for control <strong>of</strong><br />

enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in<br />

cattle<br />

Epidemiological studies <strong>of</strong> multiple-resistant<br />

Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 in cattle<br />

A longitudinal study <strong>of</strong> faecal excretion <strong>of</strong> VTEC<br />

O157 in cattle to determine epidemiological<br />

patterns and risk factors associated with excretion<br />

OZ0144 Constraints to uptake <strong>of</strong> adequate biosecurity on<br />

UK cattle and sheep farms, with special reference<br />

to zoonotic diseases<br />

OZ0145 VTEC O157 on farm control: Effective measures,<br />

perception and risk communication<br />

Index <strong>of</strong> Projects <strong>Review</strong>ed<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

01/01/06<br />

01/10/05<br />

01/04/97<br />

01/10/98<br />

01/06/02<br />

01/10/05<br />

End<br />

Date<br />

31/12/08<br />

30/09/08<br />

31/03/02<br />

31/01/05<br />

31/12/03<br />

31/03/08<br />

Contractor(s)/ Subcontractor(s)<br />

Institute for Animal Health<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh<br />

Scottish Agricultural College &<br />

Moredun <strong>Research</strong> Institute<br />

(sub-contractors)<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency<br />

Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Enteric<br />

Pathogens, Central Public<br />

Health Laboratory,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool &<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Reading<br />

(subcontractors)<br />

The University <strong>of</strong> Reading<br />

Scottish Agricultural College<br />

(sub-contractor)<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency<br />

Cost (£)<br />

351,814<br />

(<strong>Defra</strong>:<br />

£174,813, O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

funders:<br />

£177,001)<br />

628,763 (<strong>Defra</strong>:<br />

£328,762; O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

funders:<br />

£300,001)<br />

523,530<br />

2,242,139<br />

113,279<br />

210,125<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

83<br />

94<br />

56<br />

95<br />

97<br />

95<br />

31


OZ0311 Conventional versus capillary electrophoresis <strong>of</strong><br />

RFLP fragments and PCR products for sensitive<br />

OZ0312<br />

and rapid subtyping <strong>of</strong> Salmonella.<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> a sensitive and specific molecular<br />

typing method for <strong>the</strong> epidemiological study <strong>of</strong><br />

Salmonella<br />

OZ0313 Non-specific and innate resistance to Salmonella<br />

infection in chickens and pigs<br />

OZ0314 The role <strong>of</strong> defined bacterial genes and host<br />

genetic background in intestinal colonisation <strong>of</strong><br />

poultry by Salmonella<br />

OZ0315 Salmonella pathogenesis and immunity in cattle<br />

and pigs<br />

OZ0316 Epidemiological studies <strong>of</strong> Salmonella in pigs and<br />

control by intervention.<br />

OZ0317 Epidemiological investigations <strong>of</strong> Salmonella<br />

contamination in table egg production<br />

OZ0318 Understanding <strong>the</strong> dynamics <strong>of</strong> endemic and<br />

epidemic Salmonella infections in cattle: A<br />

comparative modelling approach<br />

OZ0319<br />

OZ0320<br />

OZ0321<br />

01/06/99<br />

03/01/00<br />

01/04/99<br />

01/04/99<br />

01/04/99<br />

01/08/00<br />

01/08/00<br />

01/01/03<br />

Salmonella pathogenesis in cattle and pigs 01/07/02<br />

Bacterial and host genes in Salmonella<br />

colonisation in poultry<br />

Investigation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> environmental<br />

contamination in <strong>the</strong> epidemiology <strong>of</strong> Salmonella<br />

infection in egg-laying flocks<br />

01/07/02<br />

01/10/02<br />

31/03/04<br />

31/01/03<br />

30/06/02<br />

30/06/02<br />

30/06/02<br />

31/12/06<br />

31/01/03<br />

30/04/06<br />

30/09/06<br />

30/06/05<br />

30/09/07<br />

Central Science Laboratory<br />

Laboratory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Government<br />

Chemist<br />

Stobhill NHS Trust & Poultry<br />

Health Services (subcontractors)<br />

Institute for Animal Health<br />

Institute for Animal Health<br />

Institute for Animal Health<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency<br />

London School <strong>of</strong> Hygiene &<br />

Tropical Medicine (subcontractor)<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool<br />

373,347<br />

228,700<br />

689,400<br />

679,725<br />

656,100<br />

1,222,749<br />

227,692<br />

399,343<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency & University <strong>of</strong><br />

Lancaster (sub-contractors)<br />

Institute for Animal Health 709,200<br />

Institute for Animal Health<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency<br />

956,279<br />

464,534<br />

43<br />

38<br />

54<br />

44<br />

58<br />

59<br />

49<br />

61<br />

62<br />

44<br />

49<br />

32


OZ0323<br />

OZ0324<br />

OZ0325<br />

OZ0326<br />

OZ0327<br />

OZ0328<br />

An integrated risk based approach to <strong>the</strong> control <strong>of</strong><br />

Salmonella in UK pig farms.<br />

New and emerging Salmonella serovars;<br />

epidemiological, risk-based and molecular<br />

approaches to <strong>the</strong>ir identification and control: set<br />

up studies.<br />

A monitoring, control and education package to<br />

assist <strong>the</strong> egg industry with Salmonella reduction<br />

and achieving EU targets<br />

Managing <strong>the</strong> challenges to <strong>the</strong> egg industry posed<br />

by new SE PTs<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> immunosuppression associated with<br />

point-<strong>of</strong>-lay on Salmonella infection and immunity<br />

in laying hens<br />

A monitoring, control and education package to<br />

assist <strong>the</strong> turkey industry with reduction <strong>of</strong><br />

Salmonella and antimicrobial resistance and<br />

achieving EU targets<br />

01/04/05<br />

01/10/05<br />

01/04/06<br />

01/04/06<br />

01/07/06<br />

01/04/07<br />

31/10/08<br />

31/01/09<br />

31/03/09<br />

31/03/09<br />

20/06/09<br />

31/03/10<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Bristol (subcontractor)<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency<br />

Health Protection Agency,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool,<br />

Imperial College,<br />

London School <strong>of</strong> Hygiene &<br />

Tropical Medicine & University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Wageningen (sub-<br />

contractors)<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool (subcontractor)<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Bristol, Natural<br />

England & Central Science<br />

Laboratory (sub-contractors)<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Bristol<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency (sub-contractor)<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency<br />

Agricultural Development<br />

Advisory Service & University<br />

1,053,974<br />

1,009,045<br />

753,006<br />

403,472<br />

198,000 (<strong>Defra</strong>:<br />

£37205;<br />

BBSRC:<br />

£160795)<br />

1,138,946<br />

59<br />

41<br />

49<br />

52<br />

48<br />

46<br />

33


OZ0402<br />

OZ0404<br />

OZ0405<br />

OZ0407<br />

OZ0604<br />

OZ0605<br />

What is <strong>the</strong> potential for human isolates <strong>of</strong> both<br />

genotypes <strong>of</strong> C. parvum to infect, colonise and be<br />

excreted by farm animals<br />

Bovine neosporosis: <strong>the</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> zoonotic risk<br />

and <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> evidence-based control<br />

strategies<br />

Genotypic and phenotypic comparison <strong>of</strong> Yersinia<br />

enterocolitica from humans and animals<br />

Evaluation and risk assessment <strong>of</strong> zoonotic<br />

transmission <strong>of</strong> Cryptosporidium<br />

Characterisation <strong>of</strong> strain variation in<br />

Campylobacter jejuni.<br />

Genotypic and Phenotypic Instability <strong>of</strong><br />

Campylobacters from Environmental, Animal and<br />

Human Sources<br />

01/04/00<br />

01/11/02<br />

01/05/02<br />

01/04/03<br />

01/04/99<br />

01/08/99<br />

31/03/03<br />

31/12/05<br />

30/04/05<br />

31/01/08<br />

30/09/04<br />

31/07/02<br />

<strong>of</strong> Bristol (sub-contractors)<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency<br />

Cryptosporidium Reference<br />

Group, Health Protection<br />

Agency (sub-contractor)<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency<br />

London School <strong>of</strong> Hygiene &<br />

Tropical Medicine (sub-<br />

contractor)<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency, CREH Analytical<br />

Limited & PHLS<br />

Cryptosporidium Reference<br />

Unit, Swansea Public Health<br />

Laboratory (sub-contractors)<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oxford<br />

Health Protection Agency (subcontractor)<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency<br />

Scottish Reference Laboratory<br />

for Campylobacters, Aberdeen,<br />

Queens University, Belfast,<br />

Campylobacter Reference Unit,<br />

Health Protection Agency &<br />

Institute for Animal Science<br />

and Health, The Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />

406,684<br />

242,267<br />

245,488<br />

783,631<br />

774,549<br />

298,279<br />

64<br />

68<br />

66<br />

64<br />

70<br />

72<br />

34


OZ0606<br />

OZ0607<br />

OZ0608<br />

OZ0609<br />

OZ0610<br />

OZ0611<br />

OZ0612<br />

OZ0613<br />

OZ0614<br />

OZ0703<br />

Protective immunity and competitive exclusion in<br />

development <strong>of</strong> effective intervention products for<br />

poultry.<br />

An investigation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distinguishing features <strong>of</strong> C.<br />

jejuni strains that have host/disease associations.<br />

Epidemiological studies and development <strong>of</strong><br />

practical control measures for Campylobacter in<br />

broiler flocks<br />

Determining <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> maternal antibodies in <strong>the</strong><br />

lag phase <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter jejuni infection in<br />

chickens.<br />

Survival and persistence <strong>of</strong> campylobacters in<br />

poultry farm environments and suggested control<br />

measures<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> a comprehensive MLST database<br />

for assessment <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter risk factors<br />

The epidemiology <strong>of</strong> campylobacter infection in<br />

dogs in <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> risk to humans<br />

Towards risk-based control <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter:<br />

developing <strong>the</strong> evidence base using<br />

epidemiological and bacteriological approaches<br />

To develop vaccination approaches to <strong>the</strong> control<br />

<strong>of</strong> Campylobacter in poultry.<br />

Plant antibody delivery <strong>of</strong> passive immunisation<br />

against E. coli O157:H7: a novel means <strong>of</strong> control<br />

in <strong>the</strong> animal<br />

01/04/01<br />

01/07/01<br />

01/07/02<br />

01/05/05<br />

01/09/05<br />

01/07/05<br />

18/07/05<br />

01/01/06<br />

01/04/06<br />

01/09/99<br />

31/03/04<br />

30/06/04<br />

30/06/06<br />

31/05/06<br />

31/01/09<br />

30/06/08<br />

16/07/08<br />

30/09/10<br />

31/03/09<br />

01/06/03<br />

(sub-contractors)<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency & University <strong>of</strong> Bristol<br />

(co-contractors)<br />

Imperial College (subcontractor)<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Bristol &<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency (co-contractors)<br />

Scottish Agricultural College &<br />

DTA Ltd (sub-contractors)<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oxford<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency<br />

ADAS Consulting & University<br />

232,145<br />

508,987<br />

859,393<br />

50,012<br />

746,102<br />

503,312<br />

228,351<br />

1,558,693<br />

(<strong>Defra</strong>:<br />

1,495,693; O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

funders:<br />

£200,000)<br />

267,629<br />

354,108<br />

76<br />

74<br />

78<br />

82<br />

78<br />

70<br />

84<br />

78<br />

76<br />

86<br />

35


OZ0704<br />

OZ0705<br />

OZ0706<br />

OZ0707<br />

Quantification <strong>of</strong> E. coli O157:H7 virulence factors<br />

in vivo using real-time RT-PCR<br />

A Proteomic Approach to Identify Virulence<br />

Determinants <strong>of</strong> EHEC 0157.<br />

EHEC O157 pathogenesis: Ovine and o<strong>the</strong>r animal<br />

model studies<br />

Identification <strong>of</strong> factors mediating intestinal<br />

colonisation <strong>of</strong> cattle by enterohaemorrhagic<br />

Escherichia coli O157:H7<br />

OZ0708 A Systems Analysis Methodology to Elucidate and<br />

Evaluate <strong>the</strong> Critical Control Points for E. coli<br />

0157:H7 in Cattle and sheep from farm to abattoir<br />

OZ0709<br />

OZ0710<br />

Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> VTEC 0157 and o<strong>the</strong>r VTECs<br />

likely to be pathogenic to man in farm wastes<br />

The role <strong>of</strong> goats and pigs in <strong>the</strong> maintenance and<br />

transmission <strong>of</strong> VTEC including EHEC O157:H7<br />

01/06/99<br />

01/08/99<br />

01/04/99<br />

01/10/99<br />

01/01/00<br />

01/04/02<br />

01/10/02<br />

30/09/02<br />

12/09/02<br />

30/03/04<br />

11/04/07<br />

30/06/02<br />

31/03/05<br />

30/09/05<br />

<strong>of</strong> Leicester (sub-contractors)<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Glasgow 200,764<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Southampton<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Bristol Veterinary<br />

School (sub-contractor)<br />

Institute for Animal Health<br />

Silsoe <strong>Research</strong> Institute<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency (sub-contractor)<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency,<br />

Health Protection Agency,<br />

Silsoe <strong>Research</strong> Institute &<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool (sub-<br />

contractors)<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Bristol Veterinary<br />

237,995<br />

374,377<br />

603,124<br />

151,494<br />

365,493<br />

399,546<br />

88<br />

90<br />

91<br />

98<br />

100<br />

91<br />

101<br />

36


OZ0711<br />

Incidence and control <strong>of</strong> VTEC in animal feeds 01/08/02<br />

OZ0712 Escherichia coli O157 interventions and control 01/04/03<br />

OZ0713<br />

The role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> native host gut flora and innate<br />

immune status upon <strong>the</strong> colonisation <strong>of</strong> E. coli<br />

O157 in ruminants<br />

01/10/04<br />

31/01/05<br />

30/09/06<br />

30/09/07<br />

School (sub-contractor)<br />

ADAS UK Ltd<br />

Direct Laboratory Services Ltd<br />

(co-contractor)<br />

Scottish Agricultural College<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh and<br />

Bioma<strong>the</strong>matics & Statistics<br />

Scotland (sub-contractors)<br />

Veterinary Laboratories<br />

Agency<br />

Moredun <strong>Research</strong> Institute<br />

(sub-contractor)<br />

132,343<br />

503,523<br />

272,863<br />

92<br />

93<br />

101<br />

37


Annex 2 – Project Abstracts and<br />

Project <strong>Review</strong> Summaries<br />

This annex contains an abstract prepared by <strong>the</strong> contractor for each project reviewed,<br />

and a brief summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> review discussion on each project.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r details on each project, including <strong>the</strong> final report for completed projects, can be<br />

accessed at http://randd.defra.gov.uk by searching for <strong>the</strong> project code or a keyword.<br />

38


Salmonella <strong>Research</strong> Projects<br />

Project code: OZ0312<br />

Project title: Development <strong>of</strong> a sensitive and<br />

specific molecular typing<br />

method for <strong>the</strong> epidemiological<br />

study <strong>of</strong> Salmonella<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 03/01/2000<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/01/2003<br />

£228,700<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: LGC<br />

Sub-contractor(s):<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

Stobhill NHS Trust<br />

Poultry Health Services<br />

Bacterial pathogens such as Salmonella and Campylobacter are a major cause <strong>of</strong><br />

infection in <strong>the</strong> UK, and present a significant public health problem world-wide. Identifying<br />

<strong>the</strong> source <strong>of</strong> infection is central to control <strong>the</strong> spread <strong>of</strong> disease, but can be hampered<br />

by <strong>the</strong> inability to discriminate between isolates within <strong>the</strong> most common Salmonella<br />

phage and serotypes using conventional typing methods. In this project <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> a<br />

molecular typing method, fluorescent AFLP pr<strong>of</strong>iling (AFLP), as a tool for highly<br />

discriminatory characterisation <strong>of</strong> food <strong>borne</strong> pathogens was evaluated, using Salmonella<br />

as a model organism.<br />

Until recently, conventional bacteriological methods such as serotyping and phage typing<br />

have been used for <strong>the</strong> characterisation <strong>of</strong> Salmonella.<br />

Molecular methods such as AFLP, plasmid analysis and macro-restriction fragment<br />

polymorphism typing by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) can provide improved<br />

discrimination and sensitivity in bacterial typing. AFLP analysis generates a detailed<br />

genomic pr<strong>of</strong>ile from an organism, consisting <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> accurately sized DNA<br />

fragments. The characteristic fragments within <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ile are produced by selective PCR<br />

amplification <strong>of</strong> total bacterial DNA, after initial restriction enzyme digestion. Pr<strong>of</strong>iles<br />

produced from bacterial isolates are <strong>the</strong>n be compared to assess <strong>the</strong> similarity <strong>of</strong> strains.<br />

The genomic pr<strong>of</strong>iles provide a good indication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> relatedness <strong>of</strong> isolates, and<br />

ma<strong>the</strong>matical methods <strong>of</strong> evaluating evolutionary relationships from AFLP pr<strong>of</strong>iling data<br />

have been developed.<br />

39


To test <strong>the</strong> suitability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AFLP method for sensitive characterisation <strong>of</strong> Salmonella<br />

species, over 400 isolates were selected for investigation, from <strong>the</strong> collection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Scottish Salmonella Reference Laboratory at Stobhill Hospital in Glasgow. A catalogue <strong>of</strong><br />

representative strains was produced, including 243 isolates <strong>of</strong> human origin, 83 animal<br />

isolates, 37 from a variety <strong>of</strong> foods and 26 strains acquired from environmental sources.<br />

The isolates had already been characterised by classical typing methods by <strong>the</strong> Scottish<br />

Reference Laboratory. In addition, <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> strains had been typed using<br />

PFGE, and <strong>the</strong>ir antibiotic resistance pr<strong>of</strong>ile determined. DNA extracts from <strong>the</strong><br />

resuscitated Salmonella strains were provided by <strong>the</strong> Scottish Salmonella Reference<br />

Laboratory for AFLP analysis at LGC.<br />

The first stage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project focused on development <strong>of</strong> a robust protocol for <strong>the</strong><br />

generation <strong>of</strong> AFLP pr<strong>of</strong>iles. To facilitate inter-laboratory comparison it was decided to<br />

utilise commercially available AFLP reagents provided as a Microbial Fingerprinting Kit.<br />

However, in <strong>the</strong> last year <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project, <strong>the</strong> highly variable quality <strong>of</strong> commercially<br />

available reagents necessitated a change to independently-sourced materials. The effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> parameters on <strong>the</strong> robustness and quality <strong>of</strong> AFLP pr<strong>of</strong>iles was assessed,<br />

and an optimised protocol was developed. To promote reproducible data interpretation<br />

and comparability <strong>of</strong> results between analysts and laboratories, methods for<br />

normalisation <strong>of</strong> data and criteria for AFLP pr<strong>of</strong>ile acceptance were developed. However,<br />

<strong>the</strong> inherent variability in pr<strong>of</strong>ile intensity was a significant challenge to <strong>the</strong> reproducibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> method, with subjective calling <strong>of</strong> signals on <strong>the</strong> borderline <strong>of</strong> automated detection.<br />

The variation in fragment intensity is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> main problems with robust isolate<br />

characterisation by AFLP analysis.<br />

An extensive range <strong>of</strong> commercially available PCR primer and restriction enzyme<br />

combinations were evaluated for sensitivity against a set <strong>of</strong> closely related isolates, and<br />

novel combinations targeting hyper-variable regions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Salmonella genome were also<br />

developed and tested. Genomic digestion with EcoRI and Taq I, followed by amplification<br />

using EcoRI-T and TaqI-0 selective primers was identified as <strong>the</strong> most discriminatory<br />

approach, and this was used to pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>the</strong> extensive catalogue <strong>of</strong> isolates. The AFLP<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iles produced were <strong>the</strong>n compared with known phenotypic characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

isolates to identify markers correlating with particular traits.<br />

To facilitate identification <strong>of</strong> unique markers for particular characteristics, a searchable<br />

database was developed at LGC using Micros<strong>of</strong>t Access. The database allowed both<br />

storage <strong>of</strong> isolate pr<strong>of</strong>iles and comparison <strong>of</strong> molecular and phenotypic characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

strains, enabling AFLP pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> unknown samples to be matched with related pr<strong>of</strong>iles<br />

already entered into <strong>the</strong> database. The effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> database system was<br />

demonstrated in a blind trial, although in contrast to previous studies characterising<br />

smaller numbers <strong>of</strong> isolates, robust correlation between molecular markers and phage<br />

type or o<strong>the</strong>r phenotypic characteristics could not be established.<br />

In conclusion, <strong>the</strong> AFLP typing approach <strong>of</strong>fers several advantages over currently used<br />

typing methods, including accuracy and precision <strong>of</strong> fragment sizing, and <strong>the</strong> suitability <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ile information for database storage. However, <strong>the</strong> complex, multi-step nature <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> method can lead to high failure rates, and <strong>the</strong> relatively high cost <strong>of</strong> commercial<br />

reagents and equipment are fur<strong>the</strong>r drawbacks to widespread uptake <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AFLP<br />

approach. Overall, <strong>the</strong> discriminatory power <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> technique was not found to be<br />

sufficiently high to warrant extensive fur<strong>the</strong>r effort in overcoming <strong>the</strong> very real drawbacks<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> method, particularly with <strong>the</strong> advent <strong>of</strong> newer techniques including proteomic and<br />

microarray methods, and <strong>the</strong> widespread adoption <strong>of</strong> PFGE analysis for international<br />

surveillance initiatives. .<br />

40


<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

This project aimed to improve 1) <strong>the</strong> speed <strong>of</strong> salmonella typing and 2) <strong>the</strong> ability to type<br />

some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> epidemic serotypes and subtypes (for example, Salmonella Enteritidis and<br />

Salmonella Typhimurium DT 104) to improve outbreak tracing and epidemiology in<br />

general. The use <strong>of</strong> AFLPs (amplified fragment length polymorphisms) was assessed as<br />

a typing method with <strong>the</strong>se aims in view.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> funding, this was important methodology to try to develop. The work was<br />

appropriately carried out and, although it was reasonably successful, AFLP was not<br />

sufficiently robust to be taken fur<strong>the</strong>r when o<strong>the</strong>r typing methods showed more promise.<br />

41


Project code: OZ0324<br />

Project title: New and emerging Salmonella<br />

serovars; epidemiological, riskbased<br />

and molecular<br />

approaches to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

identification and control: set up<br />

studies.<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/10/2005<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/01/2009<br />

Total cost:<br />

£1,009,045<br />

Affiliation: Veterinary Laboratories Agency<br />

Sub-contractor(s): University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

Salmonella enterica is a notifiable disease agent. The genus comprises <strong>of</strong> some 2500<br />

serovars that are defined by serological reactions recognising surface antigens including<br />

<strong>the</strong> Vi capsular antigen, <strong>the</strong> somatic O antigen and <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten phase variable flagella H<br />

antigen and can be is divided into six subspecies. S. enterica subsp. enterica affects<br />

warm blooded animals including man whereas <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r subspecies are very rarely<br />

associated with disease. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, certain serovars within subspecies I are<br />

associated with specific hosts. Host adaptation and <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> disease mediated by<br />

Salmonella is serovar specific. S. Typhi and Paratyphi cause severe systemic (typhoidal)<br />

disease in man. O<strong>the</strong>r serovars such as S. Gallinarum are adapted to cause a systemic<br />

disease in poultry and rarely affects man. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, serovars such as S.<br />

Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium are promiscuous causing disease in man and animals.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> mode <strong>of</strong> disease is largely gastro-intestinal (non-typhoidal). These two<br />

serovars cause <strong>the</strong> significant majority <strong>of</strong> human Salmonellosis. Within <strong>the</strong> EU, 100,000<br />

cases were recorded in 1997 reducing to 73,000 in 2001. In <strong>the</strong> United States, estimates<br />

<strong>of</strong> 30,000 to 40,000 cases per year have been made.<br />

The epidemiology <strong>of</strong> non-typhoidal Salmonellosis in man over <strong>the</strong> past decades<br />

worldwide has been dominated by S. Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis, S. Newport, S,<br />

Heidelberg and S. Hadar. However, <strong>the</strong>re are geographical variances with Hadar more<br />

pronounced in Europe than ei<strong>the</strong>r Newport or Heidelberg. Why S. Typhimurium,<br />

particularly <strong>the</strong> multiresistant clones such DT104, and S. Enteritidis, notably phage type<br />

4, emerged so dramatically in recent years are still unclear although hypo<strong>the</strong>ses abound.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

The rationale behind this project was considered important. Historical examination <strong>of</strong><br />

salmonella data from humans and animals suggests that, despite <strong>the</strong> measures already<br />

put in place, a future epidemic in humans is likely to arise from infections in <strong>the</strong> animal<br />

population. Since eradication <strong>of</strong> salmonella from animals is unlikely to be feasible, it will<br />

42


e important to identify an epidemic strain early, so that measures can be taken to<br />

reduce <strong>the</strong> size and cost <strong>of</strong> any resulting epidemic. It is also important to identify <strong>the</strong><br />

factors that make a strain <strong>of</strong> salmonella epidemic, and also why such strains disappear in<br />

due course.<br />

This work helps maintain an important section <strong>of</strong> expertise at VLA and keeps <strong>the</strong> VLA at<br />

<strong>the</strong> forefront <strong>of</strong> scientific methodology in this area, particularly with regard to array work<br />

and developments in GIS. The potential benefits outweigh <strong>the</strong> risks associated with <strong>the</strong><br />

development and application <strong>of</strong> new techniques. The panel felt that <strong>the</strong> work would yield<br />

valuable data when completed.<br />

43


Project code: OZ0311<br />

Project title: Conventional versus capillary electrophoresis <strong>of</strong><br />

RFLP fragments and PCR products for sensitive and<br />

rapid subtyping <strong>of</strong> Salmonella.<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/06/99<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/03/04<br />

£373,347<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Central Science Laboratory<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

We compared different molecular typing techniques in combination with two<br />

electrophoretic techniques (conventional gel and capillary electrophoresis) for molecular<br />

subtyping <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> Salmonella enterica serovars from animal, human and<br />

food or feed sources. These included Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE),<br />

Restriction Fragment Length Polymorhism (RFLP) and polymerase chain (PCR) based<br />

techniques such as Fluorescent Amplified Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (f-<br />

AFLP), Random Amplification <strong>of</strong> Polymorphic DNA (RAPD), Repetitive Extragenic<br />

Palindromic (REP) and Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus (ERIC)<br />

PCR.Comparisons between gel based and capillary electrophoresis showed that gel<br />

electrophoresis was more reliable and gave greater band resolution than capillary<br />

electrophoresis based <strong>the</strong> equipment available. Most methods gave good but not perfect<br />

serovar identification. PFGE and f-AFLP were comparable and were <strong>the</strong> most promising<br />

techniques for differentiation and characterisation at strain level within serovars. f-AFLP<br />

analysis requires improved standardisation including use <strong>of</strong> internal standards and<br />

triplicate analysis.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

This was an important comparison <strong>of</strong> techniques aimed at improving typing methods for<br />

salmonella, with <strong>the</strong> approaches used valid at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> funding.<br />

Unfortunately, none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> methods delivered <strong>the</strong> sensitivity required for epidemiological<br />

studies. Some useful information was obtained which informed future approaches to<br />

molecular typing.<br />

A major criticism <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study was that <strong>the</strong> work carried had not been published in <strong>the</strong><br />

scientific literature as <strong>the</strong> findings would have been useful to o<strong>the</strong>r scientists in <strong>the</strong> field.<br />

44


Project code: OZ0314<br />

Project title: The role <strong>of</strong> defined bacterial genes and host genetic<br />

background in intestinal colonisation <strong>of</strong> poultry by<br />

Salmonella<br />

Start date<br />

01/04/99<br />

(dd/mm/yy):<br />

End date<br />

(dd/mm/yy):<br />

30/06/02<br />

Affiliation: Institute for Animal Health<br />

Project code: OZ0320<br />

Project title: Bacterial and host genes in Salmonella colonisation in<br />

poultry<br />

Start date<br />

01/07/02<br />

(dd/mm/yy):<br />

End date<br />

30/06/05<br />

(dd/mm/yy):<br />

£956,279<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Institute for Animal Health<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

We have demonstrated that reproducible differences exist in <strong>the</strong> extent to which several<br />

Salmonella serovars colonise <strong>the</strong> alimentrary tract <strong>of</strong> genetically different inbred<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> chickens. This is not associated with <strong>the</strong> MHC type, is not sex linked and<br />

not <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> SAL1 or NRAMP1 haplotypes but is a dominant trait. Similar patterns are<br />

found when chickens are also infected with Campylobacter jejuni indicating a common<br />

mechanism. Considerable differences in <strong>the</strong> patterns <strong>of</strong> expression <strong>of</strong> selected defensin<br />

have been found in <strong>the</strong> intestinal tissues. No major differences could be found in <strong>the</strong><br />

extent to which mucin obtained from resistant or susceptible lines <strong>of</strong> chickens were able<br />

to act as nutrient sources for colonising Salmonella serovars. The resistance<br />

characteristic has enormous potential for selective breeding and for use with vaccines for<br />

infection control.<br />

Bacterial mutational studies indicated that ability to utilise sialic acid was not essential to<br />

colonisation. A number <strong>of</strong> electron acceptors used under anaerobic conditions were<br />

tested and none was found to be essential. Greater reductions were seen when mutants<br />

were unable to use substrate level phosphorylation suggesting that fermentation may be<br />

<strong>of</strong> greatest importance in <strong>the</strong> large gut. The energy storage compounds glycogen and<br />

polyphosphate contributed little to colonisation whereas <strong>the</strong>y and particularly<br />

polyphosphate was involved in survival outside <strong>the</strong> body suggesting a very important role<br />

in homeostasis.<br />

45


<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

The knowledge that <strong>the</strong>re is a genetic basis to resistance to intestinal colonisation by<br />

salmonella in poultry is important. It was felt, however, <strong>the</strong> work would have benefited<br />

from a greater involvement with <strong>the</strong> poultry industry, since without this, <strong>the</strong> findings could<br />

not be applied. It was noted that follow-on work (LK0665) was being undertaken under<br />

<strong>the</strong> LINK programme, which is jointly funded by <strong>Defra</strong> and industry.<br />

The work also contributed to maintaining an expert research team that has contributed,<br />

and subsequently published, high quality research.<br />

46


Project code: OZ0328<br />

Project title: A monitoring, control and education package to assist<br />

<strong>the</strong> turkey industry with reduction <strong>of</strong> Salmonella and<br />

antimicrobial resistance and achieving EU targets<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/04/07<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/03/10<br />

£1,138,946.00<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Veterinary Laboratories Agency (VLA)<br />

Sub-contractor(s): 1. Agricultural Development Advisory Service (ADAS)<br />

2. University <strong>of</strong> Bristol<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

The work proposed in this large multidisciplinary project aims to rapidly ga<strong>the</strong>r<br />

information from turkey breeding and production. Initially by means <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU baseline<br />

Salmonella survey which has already been largely completed as a separate contract.<br />

Fortunately <strong>the</strong> samples taken for that survey can, by agreement with <strong>the</strong> flock owner, be<br />

used for isolation <strong>of</strong> antimicrobial (fluoroquinolone and third generation cephalosporin)<br />

resistant E.coli and non-selected isolates. This, toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r characterisation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> isolates in terms <strong>of</strong> bacterial identity MIC and resistance mechanisms, and a risk<br />

factor analysis for occurrence <strong>of</strong> resistance, will be <strong>the</strong> first objective (01) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project.<br />

This will be followed by a detailed status report on <strong>the</strong> British turkey industry toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

with a publication on Salmonella trends (02).<br />

Control <strong>of</strong> Salmonella depends on effective identification <strong>of</strong> its occurrence and Objective<br />

03 provides a package <strong>of</strong> work designed to optimise and quantify <strong>the</strong> sensitivity <strong>of</strong><br />

detection as well as achieving practical economies. It is necessary to carry out detailed<br />

investigations (04) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> Salmonella in <strong>the</strong> complex network <strong>of</strong> turkey<br />

breeding and production to define where <strong>the</strong> problems are occurring and to identify 'bad'<br />

practice which can be corrected and 'best practice' which can be extended more widely.<br />

These investigations will also intercalate studies on <strong>the</strong> dynamics <strong>of</strong> resistant E.coli with<br />

and without fluoroquinolone treatment and will lead to <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> improved<br />

objective auditing procedures for control <strong>of</strong> Salmonella (05). In Objective 06 successful<br />

management methods which have been shown to control Salmonella will be applied to<br />

problem farms as trial interventions for both Salmonella and resistant E.coli, and for more<br />

difficult cases competitive exclusion and organic acid treatment will also be used (07).<br />

The costs and benefits <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se control options will be assessed as part <strong>of</strong> an economic<br />

analysis (08) and finally <strong>the</strong> lessons learned from <strong>the</strong> totality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> research, and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

relevant current sources, will be consolidated in an industry education package (09)<br />

which will include a roadshow campaign and a training DVD and e-mail information<br />

network. The project involves major players in Salmonella field research and<br />

consultancy and major turkey breeding and production integrations and <strong>the</strong>ir veterinary<br />

consultants to form a powerful project task-force. The package <strong>of</strong> objectives <strong>the</strong>refore<br />

fully supports industry and <strong>Defra</strong> priorities and public health interests and will provide <strong>the</strong><br />

turkey industry with effective methods to meet and exceed future EU requirements.<br />

47


<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

The project was felt to have <strong>the</strong> potential to provide extremely important information for<br />

<strong>Defra</strong>‘s policies. The findings were likely to assist <strong>the</strong> turkey industry in meeting<br />

European Community salmonella targets and to cement <strong>the</strong> joint industry/government<br />

approach to salmonella control. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> data collected is relevant to <strong>the</strong><br />

sustainable use <strong>of</strong> important antimicrobials in this sector and <strong>the</strong> long-term health <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

UK turkey industry. The project also fits well with <strong>the</strong> <strong>Defra</strong> policy on working in<br />

partnership with <strong>the</strong> relevant groups.<br />

At this early stage, <strong>the</strong>re are no conclusions, dissemination, or reports on progress to<br />

assess <strong>the</strong> project. However, it was noted to be a well thought-out project, by an<br />

impressive team, which should produce very valuable information for government and<br />

industry if it continues to receive full support from <strong>the</strong> industry.<br />

48


Project code: OZ0327<br />

Project title: Effect <strong>of</strong> immunosuppression associated with point<strong>of</strong>-lay<br />

on Salmonella infection and immunity in laying<br />

hens<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/07/06<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 20/06/09<br />

£198,000 (<strong>Defra</strong>: £37205; BBSRC: £160795)<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Department <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Pathology,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

Previously we have shown that suppression <strong>of</strong> cell-mediated immunity at point-<strong>of</strong>-lay in<br />

hens is a critical factor in reproductive tract infection by Salmonella enterica and<br />

subsequent transmission to eggs. This project will characterise <strong>the</strong> immunolgical<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> avian reproductive tract, which immunological changes take place at<br />

point-<strong>of</strong>-lay and determine whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>se affect <strong>the</strong> immune response to Salmonella and<br />

in particular whe<strong>the</strong>r suppression <strong>of</strong> immune responses reduce <strong>the</strong> efficacy <strong>of</strong><br />

vaccination, leading to a gap in immune protection. This will be achieved through<br />

investigating changes in cell populations, expression <strong>of</strong> key cytokines and chemokines<br />

and antibody levels. We will assess changes in protection through in vivo challenge<br />

experiments. We will <strong>the</strong>n look at how changes in vaccination or stimulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

immune system through recombinant cytokines can improve protection and prevent any<br />

gap in immunity.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> summary<br />

<strong>Research</strong> on <strong>the</strong> avian immunological response during <strong>the</strong> point-<strong>of</strong>-lay period, when<br />

salmonella breakdowns tend to occur, should provide valuable information for salmonella<br />

control. The overall plan for <strong>the</strong> work is clearly laid out and <strong>the</strong> researchers are making<br />

good progress towards <strong>the</strong> stated objectives.<br />

If this approach proves to be successful, <strong>the</strong>re will be a need to understand how <strong>the</strong><br />

information can be utilised in <strong>the</strong> field and possible to investigate changes at <strong>the</strong> end-<strong>of</strong>lay<br />

when salmonella breakdowns are also known to occur.<br />

It is appropriate that this work is jointly funded with BBSRC as it may take some years for<br />

results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work to benefit UK poultry industry.<br />

49


Project code: OZ0317<br />

Project title: Epidemiological investigations <strong>of</strong> Salmonella<br />

contamination in table egg production<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/08/00<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/01/03<br />

£227,692.00<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Veterinary Laboratories Agency (VLA)<br />

Project code: OZ0321<br />

Project title: Investigation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> environmental<br />

contamination in <strong>the</strong> epidemiology <strong>of</strong> Salmonella<br />

infection in egg-laying flock<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/10/2002<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 30/09/2007<br />

Total cost:<br />

£464,534.00<br />

Affiliation: Veterinary Laboratories Agency (VLA)<br />

Sub-contractor(s): University <strong>of</strong> Bristol<br />

Project code: OZ0325<br />

Project title: A monitoring, control and education package to assist<br />

<strong>the</strong> egg industry with Salmonella reduction and<br />

achieving EU targets<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/04/06<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/03/09<br />

Total cost:<br />

£753,006.00<br />

Affiliation: Veterinary Laboratories Agency (VLA)<br />

Sub-contractor(s): University <strong>of</strong> Bristol<br />

Natural England<br />

Central Science Laboratory<br />

50


Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

The VLA research work on Salmonella in commercial laying farms began <strong>of</strong>ficially in<br />

2000 with Project OZ0317, although some pilot investigations had been carried out prior<br />

to that. Voluntary investigations on laying farms where S.Enteritidis (SE) had been<br />

identified as a result <strong>of</strong> trace back investigations from food poisoning outbreaks,<br />

investigations <strong>of</strong> clinical disease or (rarely) identification <strong>of</strong> SE as a result <strong>of</strong> voluntary<br />

monitoring under <strong>the</strong> British Egg Industry Council (BEIC) Lion Code scheme showed that<br />

<strong>the</strong> principal problem was horizontal infection resulting from persistence <strong>of</strong> contamination<br />

in poorly cleaned houses and particularly in breeding mice or rat populations in <strong>the</strong><br />

houses. Occasional new introductions <strong>of</strong> infection due to infection in breeding flocks or<br />

contamination <strong>of</strong> hatcheries were also investigated but <strong>the</strong>se incidents were uncommon.<br />

Persistence <strong>of</strong> SE appeared to be independent <strong>of</strong> vaccination status, except in barn or<br />

free-range farms where <strong>the</strong>re were no rodent problems which became free <strong>of</strong> infection<br />

when new vaccinated flocks were introduced. Contamination <strong>of</strong> eggs from infected<br />

vaccinated flock birds reduced by around 70% compared with those from non-vaccinated<br />

flocks. Cross-contamination during egg packing was also identified. The scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

work was widened with increased funding in Project OZ0321 and various investigations<br />

involving quantification <strong>of</strong> SE demonstrated high numbers <strong>of</strong> organisms associated with<br />

rodents and flies. Exposure studies at Bristol University demonstrated <strong>the</strong> high risk<br />

associated with contaminated drinking equipment (a common finding in layer flocks)<br />

regardless <strong>of</strong> vaccination. Vaccine transition studies suggested that <strong>the</strong>re may be<br />

significant differences between <strong>the</strong> efficacy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> various vaccination programmes.<br />

Randomly recruited farms from <strong>the</strong> EU Baseline Survey showed identical problems to <strong>the</strong><br />

original study cohort and sampling comparisons identified significant differences in <strong>the</strong><br />

sensitivity <strong>of</strong> various monitoring options, especially in large barn or free-range flocks<br />

where subdivision <strong>of</strong> floor spaces led to a dilution effect and false negative results when<br />

limited numbers <strong>of</strong> boot swabs were used. In Project OZ0325 good progress has been<br />

made on problem farms by including specialist pest control and decontamination services<br />

in <strong>the</strong> project team and <strong>the</strong> project leader has been involved in redrafting various codes<br />

<strong>of</strong> practice and SVS guidance documents as well as <strong>the</strong> BEIC Lion Code and toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

with Natural England has been involved in a nationwide road show campaign for <strong>the</strong> egg<br />

industry.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

The work covers a very wide spectrum <strong>of</strong> issues <strong>of</strong> key relevance to <strong>the</strong> commercial egg<br />

industry and extends <strong>the</strong> fundamental knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> practical epidemiology in this<br />

area. Different parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work have contributed to <strong>the</strong> evidence base, to <strong>the</strong><br />

development <strong>of</strong> diagnostic tests and sampling methodology and to improvement in<br />

methods <strong>of</strong> control. It was particularly encouraging to find that salmonella-positive flocks<br />

can turn negative, and that infection levels can be reduced.<br />

The work was fundamental to building better relationships with <strong>the</strong> industry, which has<br />

assisted both subsequent research and also policy development involving partnership<br />

with industry. The current research is crucial to <strong>Defra</strong> in developing with industry a<br />

salmonella control programme that meets EC salmonella requirements and keeps <strong>the</strong> UK<br />

egg industry at <strong>the</strong> forefront in terms <strong>of</strong> quality. It has allowed <strong>Defra</strong> to negotiate a UK<br />

position based on best available science and <strong>the</strong> main research worker has acted as an<br />

independent adviser to <strong>the</strong> EC. The results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> research have been successfully<br />

disseminated to industry by means <strong>of</strong> a road-show led by <strong>the</strong> British Egg Industry<br />

Council.<br />

51


It is clear that <strong>the</strong> EC legislative changes, which began to be introduced from 2007, will<br />

impact on <strong>the</strong> industry, possibly quite severely, and it is likely that <strong>the</strong>re will be a need for<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r work to address some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new issues that will arise out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> legislation.<br />

52


Project code: OZ0326<br />

Project title: Managing <strong>the</strong> challenges to <strong>the</strong> egg industry posed<br />

by new SE PTs<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/04/06<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/03/09<br />

Total cost:<br />

£403,472.00<br />

Affiliation: University <strong>of</strong> Bristol<br />

Sub-contractor(s): VLA<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

Salmonella spp. are highly important zoonotic pathogens causing over one billion cases<br />

<strong>of</strong> infection worldwide each year. One Salmonella serovar, in particular, is most<br />

important. For <strong>the</strong> last 20 years <strong>the</strong>re has been a pandemic <strong>of</strong> Salmonella Enteritidis<br />

(SE) infection in almost all parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world, including Europe and this has largely been<br />

egg-associated. The pandemic continues and SE remains a highly important zoonotic<br />

pathogen. The longevity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pandemic is unique and is associated with <strong>the</strong> invasive<br />

behaviour <strong>of</strong> SE in chickens and <strong>the</strong> fact that infection in laying hens is largely subclinical.<br />

The pandemic does have dynamic aspects, however, and <strong>the</strong> last few years <strong>the</strong><br />

UK, and some o<strong>the</strong>r EU member states, has seen a marked shift in phage types <strong>of</strong> SE<br />

from human cases. Prior to this, one PT, PT4 dominated <strong>the</strong> epidemiological picture in<br />

Western Europe. More outbreaks in <strong>the</strong> UK are now caused by PTs o<strong>the</strong>r than 4. For<br />

example, PT 1 has risen from c.850 cases in 1999 to c.2000 in 2003. Similarly, cases<br />

caused by PT 14b rose from c.150 to c.950 in <strong>the</strong> same period. The new PTs may<br />

become established in <strong>the</strong> UK and it is important to establish <strong>the</strong> risk posed by <strong>the</strong>se new<br />

and potentially highly dangerous PTs, which threaten animal and public health in <strong>the</strong> UK.<br />

Changes in Salmonella type, as manifested by PT alterations, occur with high frequency<br />

and must challenge control measures put in place to deal with different strains.<br />

The research is identifying how a range <strong>of</strong> relevant SE PTs differ in surface structures,<br />

particularly LPS, and how <strong>the</strong>se changes influence <strong>the</strong> growth and survival <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

bacteria in whole eggs and egg components. The work will also encompass interaction <strong>of</strong><br />

SE PTs with immune sera from vaccinated hens and infection biology in immunised (with<br />

PT4) and non-immune hens. Identification <strong>of</strong> surface structures and how <strong>the</strong>se affect<br />

virulence will eventually enable improved vaccines to be produced. The investigators are<br />

already interacting with vaccine companies.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

Understanding differences between phage types <strong>of</strong> S. Enteriditis was considered<br />

important, particularly if it shed light on understanding <strong>the</strong> risk to public health associated<br />

with table eggs. Vaccination <strong>of</strong> poultry with a vaccine based on phage type 4 has been a<br />

significant plank in <strong>the</strong> control <strong>of</strong> S. Enteritidis in <strong>the</strong> UK and it was important to establish<br />

53


if <strong>the</strong> vaccines currently available are effective against o<strong>the</strong>r S. Enteritidis phage types<br />

prevalent in <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> Europe. The work will contribute significantly to <strong>the</strong> evidence base<br />

and should result in improved methods <strong>of</strong> control. The project is intended to assist <strong>the</strong><br />

poultry layer industry to reduce levels <strong>of</strong> salmonella and it is important that <strong>the</strong> industry<br />

remains involved.<br />

54


Project code: OZ0313<br />

Project title: Non-specific and innate resistance to Salmonella<br />

infection in chickens and pigs<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/04/99<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 30/06/02<br />

£689,400<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Institute for Animal Health<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

We have studied <strong>the</strong> biological and cellular basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> difference in in vivo killing <strong>of</strong><br />

Salmonella strain by chicken lines which are ei<strong>the</strong>r resistant or susceptible to systemic<br />

salmonellosis. Resistance correlated with killing by macrophages cultured in vitro from<br />

<strong>the</strong> blood <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> respective chicken lines. This also correlated with <strong>the</strong> extent to which<br />

antibacterial oxidative radicals were produced in response to in vitro infection. This is a<br />

useful biological marker <strong>of</strong> this important genetic trait.<br />

Infection <strong>of</strong> epi<strong>the</strong>lial cells by different Salmonella serovars provoked different responses.<br />

S. Typhimurium induced high levels <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pro-inflammatory chemokines IL-1 and IL-6<br />

whereas S. Gallinarum was able to suppress <strong>the</strong>ir production. The suppressive<br />

capabilities <strong>of</strong> Salmonella strains was also demonstrated by virulent strains <strong>of</strong> S.<br />

Typhimurium in murine macrophages which were able to down-regulate <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong><br />

nitric oxide through <strong>the</strong> NF kappa B pathway. The induction <strong>of</strong> innate responses by live<br />

vaccines and <strong>the</strong>ir protective ability has been demonstrated in gnotobiotic pigs which has<br />

been found to be mediated by <strong>the</strong> induction <strong>of</strong> IL-8 induced neutrophils into <strong>the</strong> villus.<br />

The stimulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> innate response by live vaccines is a useful attribute. We have<br />

also found <strong>the</strong> neutrophils have <strong>the</strong> potential to act as antigen presenting cells through<br />

<strong>the</strong> expression <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> B17 co stimulatory molecule.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

The project was appropriate at <strong>the</strong> time it was commissioned. It was carried out to a high<br />

standard and produced interesting results. It has considerably advanced <strong>the</strong><br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fundamental mechanisms for establishment and clearance<br />

<strong>of</strong> salmonella infections in chickens and pigs. The goals <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> research, namely 1) to<br />

determine <strong>the</strong> cellular basis for <strong>the</strong> difference in susceptibility to systemic salmonellosis<br />

in inbred chicken lines, and 2) to determine <strong>the</strong> basis for <strong>the</strong> stimulation <strong>of</strong> non-specific<br />

immunity in <strong>the</strong> pig intestine following intestinal colonisation by an avirulent rough<br />

Salmonella Infantis strain, have been achieved.<br />

The pig work demonstrated effective activation <strong>of</strong> innate immune response by one<br />

serotype (S. Infantis) to protect from disease induced by ano<strong>the</strong>r serotype (S.<br />

Typhimurium). However, this protection did not reduce <strong>the</strong> colonisation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> intestine<br />

so, as in <strong>the</strong> chicken work, it is more relevant to control <strong>of</strong> animal disease than to <strong>the</strong><br />

zoonoses.<br />

55


Four published papers have come out <strong>of</strong> this project, two on poultry and two on pigs. The<br />

poultry work has rapidly been overtaken by alternative vaccine approaches. The pig work<br />

is still continuing, with <strong>the</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> solving problems specific to <strong>the</strong> UK. Any future work<br />

should be done with full involvement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> industry.<br />

56


Project code: OZ0135<br />

Project title: Epidemiological studies <strong>of</strong> multiple-resistant<br />

Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 in cattle<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/04/1997<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/03/2002<br />

£523,530<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Veterinary Laboratories Agency<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

This 5-year epidemiological project aimed to provide a better understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

epidemiology <strong>of</strong> multiple-resistant (MR) Salmonella Typhimurium DT 104 and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Salmonella infections in cattle herds. The project started during an epidemic <strong>of</strong> MR S.<br />

Typhimurium DT 104 in cattle, and increasing numbers <strong>of</strong> human infections with this<br />

organism, in <strong>the</strong> 1990s in Great Britain. The original proposal included an intervention<br />

study to test <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> control measures in cattle herds, but this was replaced<br />

with additional epidemiological studies because <strong>the</strong>re was a marked decline in reported<br />

cases <strong>of</strong> this organism in cattle during <strong>the</strong> study.<br />

The studies demonstrated:<br />

1. Salmonella infection <strong>of</strong> dairy herds in England and Wales was common but most<br />

herds were infected with serotypes unusual in human cases.<br />

2. Infection was clustered geographically and more common in large herds<br />

3. Management risk factors were identified providing evidence for control<br />

4. Herds with clinical outbreaks <strong>of</strong> S Typhimurium DT104 did not usually experience<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r outbreaks but risk was higher than <strong>the</strong> general population<br />

5. Biosecurity on dairy farms was generally poor and, at <strong>the</strong> time, it was considered<br />

difficult to improve sufficiently to control Salmonella<br />

6 The standardised environmental sampling protocol used had many advantages in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> cost and feasibility for <strong>the</strong> detection <strong>of</strong> Salmonella at <strong>the</strong> farm level and could be<br />

adapted for o<strong>the</strong>r livestock systems and organisms<br />

7. Many Salmonella infections in cattle herds will be unreported by routine surveillance<br />

<strong>of</strong> laboratory submissions for clinical diagnoses.<br />

It is unlikely that Salmonella will be eradicated from dairy farms in <strong>the</strong> short to medium<br />

term, and <strong>the</strong>refore human exposure to this organism originating from dairy farms should<br />

be minimised, for example by ensuring <strong>the</strong> proper pasteurisation <strong>of</strong> milk and provision <strong>of</strong><br />

advice to all farm workers and visitors.<br />

There were numerous potential transmission routes for Salmonella, and o<strong>the</strong>r infections,<br />

within <strong>the</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> G.B dairy farms (e.g., high number <strong>of</strong> animal movements) and <strong>the</strong><br />

industry (e.g., network <strong>of</strong> markets and dealers). Emerging serotypes (eg MR S. Newport)<br />

are likely to spread rapidly after introduction and effective intervention to limit <strong>the</strong>ir spread<br />

will be difficult. Emerging serotypes not associated with disease will not be readily<br />

identified by current surveillance.<br />

57


<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

This epidemiological study was carefully planned and executed and <strong>the</strong> results can be<br />

used to inform salmonella surveillance/control and basic biosecurity extension work.<br />

Care would need to be taken in using <strong>the</strong> information since <strong>the</strong> epidemiological<br />

information was gained while <strong>the</strong> S. Typhimurium DT 104 epidemic was waning. There<br />

was also some discussion as whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> herds for <strong>the</strong> recurrence study had<br />

potential for bias.<br />

Several peer-reviewed scientific publications were reported but <strong>the</strong>se had not in fact<br />

been published as <strong>of</strong> November 2007. More might have been done to disseminate <strong>the</strong><br />

results among farmers, for example, through <strong>the</strong> farming press.<br />

It is probably reasonable to believe that a new epidemic <strong>of</strong> Salmonella in cattle will occur<br />

at some time in <strong>the</strong> future, as <strong>the</strong>re has been a series <strong>of</strong> epidemics in <strong>the</strong> past. <strong>Research</strong><br />

will need to be put in place at an early stage to establish <strong>the</strong> epidemiology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> disease<br />

during <strong>the</strong> rise in <strong>the</strong> epidemic, in order to attempt to reduce <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> epidemic.<br />

<strong>Research</strong> is underway to try to assist with <strong>the</strong> prediction <strong>of</strong> a new epidemic.<br />

58


Project code: OZ0315<br />

Project title: Salmonella pathogenesis and immunity in cattle and<br />

pigs<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/04/1999<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 30/06/2002<br />

£656,100<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Institute for Animal Health, Compton<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

Salmonella enterica subspecies I is an important cause <strong>of</strong> enteric disease in man and<br />

farmed livestock. Infections <strong>of</strong>ten involve acute enteritis and may be complicated by lifethreatening<br />

systemic sequelae depending on serovar- and host-specific factors. In <strong>the</strong><br />

absence <strong>of</strong> effective vaccines, control and <strong>the</strong>rapy <strong>of</strong> Salmonellosis in livestock relies on<br />

fluid replacement and antibiotic use. Widespread concern exists that <strong>the</strong> latter may lead<br />

to an increase in transmissible antibiotic resistance. Toward <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong><br />

intervention strategies not reliant on antibiotic use, <strong>Defra</strong> project OZ0315 aimed to<br />

identify and characterize factors influencing Salmonella pathogenesis and host<br />

responses in cattle and pigs. We characterized a panel <strong>of</strong> S. enterica serovars <strong>of</strong><br />

differing virulence in calves and pigs and observed that systemic virulence correlated<br />

with enhanced persistence in mesenteric lymph nodes but not <strong>the</strong> response <strong>of</strong> primary<br />

macrophages infected ex vivo. The cell tropism <strong>of</strong> S. enterica serovars in <strong>the</strong> bovine<br />

intestinal mucosa was also examined and host cell-killing by a novel caspase-dependent<br />

mechanism distinct from apoptosis characterized. Systemic translocation <strong>of</strong> S. Dublin in<br />

calves was observed to occur via efferent lymphatics, but not venous blood, in a cell-free<br />

niche. By targeted and genome-wide mutagenesis factors influencing both <strong>the</strong> enteric<br />

and systemic virulence <strong>of</strong> Salmonella in calves and pigs were identified, providing<br />

valuable data for <strong>the</strong> rational attenuation <strong>of</strong> Salmonella for use as live vaccines.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

This was a good, practical project with an excellent output <strong>of</strong> 18 published papers. It had<br />

provided information on <strong>the</strong> molecular basis <strong>of</strong> salmonella pathogenesis in cattle and<br />

pigs and had <strong>the</strong> potential to assist with control by providing data for <strong>the</strong> rational<br />

development <strong>of</strong> live vaccines. However, it was noted that while this was high-quality<br />

science, it was, for <strong>Defra</strong>‘s purposes, quite distant from practical applications.<br />

The contractors had much expertise in <strong>the</strong> area and used novel techniques to fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

develop <strong>the</strong> work. There was progress towards identifying suitable vaccine candidates,<br />

but <strong>the</strong> project leader has now left. Project OZ0319 was set up to address some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

questions raised by this study.<br />

59


Project code: OZO316<br />

Project title: Epidemiological studies <strong>of</strong> Salmonella in pigs and<br />

control by intervention.<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/08/2000<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/12/2006<br />

£1,222,749<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: VLA<br />

Sub-contractor(s):<br />

Project code: OZ0323<br />

London School <strong>of</strong> Hygiene and Tropical Medicine<br />

Project title: An integrated risk based approach to <strong>the</strong> control <strong>of</strong><br />

Salmonella in UK pig farms.<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/04/2005<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/10/2008<br />

£1,053,974.00<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: VLA<br />

Sub-contractor(s): Health Protection Agency<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool,<br />

Imperial College,<br />

London School <strong>of</strong> Hygiene and Tropical Medicine,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Wageningen<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

Salmonella bacteria live in <strong>the</strong> gut <strong>of</strong> all animals including man and some 15,000 human<br />

cases are reported annually. About 1500 cases are caused by Salmonella Typhimurium<br />

(STM), which is found in cattle, poultry and pigs. STM occurs in 1/8th <strong>of</strong> British slaughter<br />

pigs potentially leading to human disease. The Industry established <strong>the</strong> ZAP control<br />

programme and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Food</strong> Standards Agency aims to reduce salmonella in pigs by 50%.<br />

By understanding <strong>the</strong> epidemiology <strong>of</strong> salmonella infection in pigs and through <strong>the</strong><br />

foodchain we can devise control measures to reduce <strong>the</strong> human health risk.<br />

Salmonella infection can be detected by culture <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bacteria, which shows status<br />

today, or by testing for circulating antibodies which measures lifetime exposure and we<br />

used both methods. A survey <strong>of</strong> 107 farms showed that most (>50%) have a low<br />

prevalence <strong>of</strong> infection (


We created a farm-fork quantitative risk assessment model that indicates reducing<br />

between-pen transmission, e.g. by not mixing pigs, is crucial. No more than one third <strong>of</strong><br />

human STM cases may be attributable to GB pigs and a reduction in prevalence on farm<br />

will result in some public health benefit.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

This project is considered to have produced good basic work, which needed to be done.<br />

In order to reduce <strong>the</strong> incidence <strong>of</strong> salmonella in pigs, it is vital to look at <strong>the</strong> basic<br />

epidemiology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> infection in <strong>the</strong>se animals, which is complex. Progress has been<br />

painfully slow but a lot <strong>of</strong> basic work needed to be done. This project has produced<br />

important basic information about <strong>the</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> salmonella in finishing pig farms in<br />

UK and identified risk factors for herds becoming infected.<br />

Project OZO316 provided an early and important attempt at joint <strong>Defra</strong>/industry<br />

partnership. The poor support for <strong>the</strong> intervention trial was disappointing and affected <strong>the</strong><br />

scientific value <strong>of</strong> that part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project. Useful lessons were learned about projects<br />

involving collaboration with industry, which have been helpful in delivering subsequent<br />

<strong>Defra</strong>/industry research on <strong>the</strong> poultry side.<br />

This work has led into <strong>the</strong> next project OZ0323 and this work is still on-going. OZ0323<br />

includes extensions to include <strong>the</strong> potential impact from farm to retailer. OZ0323 is a<br />

worthwhile, multi-disciplinary project and should clarify many questions concerning<br />

salmonellosis in pigs, from which future control strategies can be determined, although<br />

farm-level risk factors can be difficult to identify for a multi-factorial disease. The study<br />

highlighted <strong>the</strong> difficulties in successfully implementing interventions to decrease <strong>the</strong><br />

prevalence <strong>of</strong> salmonella. One query that arose was <strong>the</strong> difference between test results<br />

and prevalence.<br />

61


Project code: OZ0318<br />

Project title: Understanding <strong>the</strong> dynamics <strong>of</strong> endemic and<br />

epidemic Salmonella infections in cattle: A<br />

comparative modelling approach<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/01/03<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 30/04/06<br />

£399,343.00<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool<br />

Sub-contractor(s): Veterinary Laboratories Agency<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Lancaster<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

There were four interrelated aspects to this study <strong>of</strong> endemic and epidemic Salmonella<br />

infections in dairy cattle, as follows:<br />

1. Ma<strong>the</strong>matical modeling. Considered both within herd and between herd transmission.<br />

Focused on teasing out features underlying <strong>the</strong> variation in <strong>the</strong> infection dynamics <strong>of</strong><br />

different serotypes.<br />

2. Immunological studies and quantitative microbiology. Began with <strong>the</strong> objective <strong>of</strong><br />

developing methods for measuring immunological responses to Salmonella infections in<br />

cattle. Concerns arose over validity in very young animals and suitability for determining<br />

long-term immunity. Alternative approach <strong>the</strong>n taken (2a), involving on-farm longitudinal<br />

studies and experimental Salmonella survival studies.<br />

3. Space-time statistical analysis. Largely concerned with investigating <strong>the</strong> evidence for<br />

clustering, as this could provide evidence relating to <strong>the</strong> transmissibility <strong>of</strong> infection (or its<br />

origin in localised environmental processes). 4. Systematic literature review.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

It was felt it should be useful to develop a model for salmonella in cattle. Although <strong>the</strong><br />

ma<strong>the</strong>matics behind <strong>the</strong> modelling is complex and difficult to understand, <strong>the</strong> researchers<br />

had done a good job <strong>of</strong> presenting <strong>the</strong>ir approach openly and clearly, including an openaccess<br />

web page. The model had only been developed for cattle because <strong>of</strong> time<br />

restraints and it may be worth considering whe<strong>the</strong>r it could be applied to pigs.<br />

There was concern that <strong>the</strong> model would not be satisfactory if it did not take account <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> carrier state associated with S. Dublin, which is what makes S. Dublin so difficult to<br />

control in <strong>the</strong> British population. There was also uncertainty about how <strong>the</strong> model had<br />

been developed—it started as a generic salmonella model, which was <strong>the</strong>n applied to<br />

Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Agama, and Salmonella Dublin, and <strong>the</strong>n labels <strong>of</strong><br />

endemic and epidemic were applied, with no account taken <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> carrier state.<br />

62


Project code: OZ0319<br />

Project title: Salmonella pathogenesis in cattle and pigs<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/07/2002<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 30/09/2006<br />

£709,200<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Institute for Animal Health, Compton<br />

Sub-contractor(s): None<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

Salmonella enterica is an enteric bacterial pathogen <strong>of</strong> worldwide importance. Over<br />

2500 distinct serovars <strong>of</strong> S. enterica exist and <strong>the</strong>se can be divided into three broad<br />

types; ubiquitous serovars that can cause acute but self-limiting gastroenteritis in a broad<br />

range <strong>of</strong> hosts (e.g. S. Typhimurium), host-restricted serovars that exhibit a preference<br />

for a narrower range <strong>of</strong> hosts (e.g. S. Dublin and S. Choleraesuis) and host-specific<br />

serovars that produce disease in only one host (e.g. S. Typhi in humans). Host-restricted<br />

and -specific serovars <strong>of</strong>ten cause only mild enteritis but possess <strong>the</strong> ability to<br />

disseminate from <strong>the</strong> intestines to <strong>the</strong> organs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> body, causing typhoid fever-like<br />

illnesses in animals that may be severe and life-threatening. Non-typhoidal Salmonellosis<br />

caused by ubiquitous serovars also poses serious welfare and economic problems for<br />

livestock producers. Moreover, Salmonella infection <strong>of</strong> pigs and cattle can lead to entry <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> pathogen into <strong>the</strong> food chain and environment, providing an important reservoir <strong>of</strong><br />

human infection. The molecular mechanisms underlying <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> Salmonella enterica<br />

to colonise <strong>the</strong> intestines <strong>of</strong> food-producing animals, induce enteritis and in some cases<br />

translocate to distal sites, are poorly understood. <strong>Defra</strong>-funded research conducted<br />

under project OZ0319 aimed to understand <strong>the</strong>se processes in greater detail and to use<br />

<strong>the</strong> knowledge to develop, test and refine novel methods <strong>of</strong> disease control. Such<br />

research led to <strong>the</strong> testing <strong>of</strong> subunit vaccines in pigs, live-attenuated vaccines in calves<br />

and analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> protective efficacy <strong>of</strong> small molecule inhibitors that disarm a key<br />

Salmonella virulence factor.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

Innovative and novel methodologies were used to examine <strong>the</strong> pathogenesis <strong>of</strong><br />

salmonella in cattle and pigs, including factors that play conserved roles in colonisation <strong>of</strong><br />

calves, pigs and chickens, and host-specific colonisation factors. The researchers<br />

identified cytokine responses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> intestinal mucosa following infection with S.<br />

Typhimurium and <strong>the</strong> host-specific serovars, S. Dublin and S. Choleraesuis. The project<br />

included an examination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> attenuation <strong>of</strong> mutant strains in vitro and in<br />

animals. The researchers fur<strong>the</strong>r examined <strong>the</strong> efficacy <strong>of</strong> a subunit vaccine that<br />

comprised S. Typhimurium Type III secreted proteins in pigs, and <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> smallmolecule<br />

inhibitors <strong>of</strong> Type III secretion to block Salmonella-induced Enteritis.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> study has increased background knowledge, for this project to be really<br />

relevant to <strong>Defra</strong>, it also needed to attract <strong>the</strong> interest and funding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wider<br />

63


agricultural industry/public health community. Without this link, it might be more<br />

appropriate for fur<strong>the</strong>r funding to come from BBSRC than <strong>Defra</strong>.<br />

An experienced team with a good track record for producing high-quality science worked<br />

on this project. The work is sound and appropriate, and dissemination <strong>of</strong> findings was<br />

impressive, with <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> several excellent scientific papers.<br />

64


7. n<br />

Project code: OZ0402<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r zoonotic pathogens <strong>of</strong> interest<br />

Project title: What is <strong>the</strong> potential for human isolates <strong>of</strong> both<br />

genotypes <strong>of</strong> C. parvum to infect, colonise and be<br />

excreted by farm animals<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/04/2000<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/03/2003<br />

£406,684<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Veterinary Laboratories Agency,<br />

Sub-contractor(s):<br />

Project code: OZ0407<br />

Cryptosporidium Reference Group,<br />

HPA<br />

Project title: Evaluation and risk assessment <strong>of</strong> zoonotic<br />

transmission <strong>of</strong> Cryptosporidium<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/04/2003<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/01/2008<br />

£783,631<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: VLA<br />

Sub-contractor(s):<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

CREH Analytical Limited,<br />

PHLS Cryptosporidium Reference Unit, Swansea<br />

Public Health Laboratory<br />

Cryptosporidium infection in people can result in severe clinical disease, which in<br />

immuno-compromised patients can be fatal. Most human infection is with ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> two<br />

predominant species, C. hominis (thought until recently to be human specific) and C.<br />

parvum. Both cause sporadic cases and outbreaks <strong>of</strong> disease. However, <strong>the</strong> Health<br />

Protection Agency (HPA) and UK Cryptosporidium Reference Unit (CRU) have identified<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r species and genotypes previously associated with animals, including C.<br />

meleagridis, C. felis and C. canis in patients. Species identification is currently only<br />

possible by molecular analyses and is not undertaken during routine diagnosis in primary<br />

65


testing laboratories. In addition, as more discriminatory sub-typing methods are<br />

developed and applied, evidence for heterogeneity within species is increasing.<br />

The studies undertaken in OZ0402 and OZ0407 aimed to investigate <strong>the</strong> relationship<br />

between isolates <strong>of</strong> Cryptosporidium in human disease and in animal and environmental<br />

contacts using molecular analyses to enhance characterisation and discrimination<br />

between sub-types. Studies were designed to establish zoonotic potential using<br />

infectivity experiments in calves, lambs, pigs, turkeys and chickens to assess whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

different genotypes can infect, colonise and be excreted by farm animals. The host range<br />

<strong>of</strong> Cryptosporidium species, genotypes and subtypes was investigated using enhanced<br />

surveillance <strong>of</strong> human cases in defined geographical areas and following up potential<br />

sources <strong>of</strong> zoonotic infection for humans by sampling key pet, farm animal and/or<br />

environmental contacts. Although transmission <strong>of</strong> Cryptosporidium to humans by direct<br />

animal contact has been demonstrated and reported, <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> disease through direct or<br />

indirect contact with animals or animal faeces during occupational or recreational<br />

activities is unknown. Quantitative risk assessment modeling was used to assess <strong>the</strong><br />

contribution <strong>of</strong> farm animals and pets to human infection using data derived from <strong>the</strong>se<br />

studies and to suggest intervention strategies for <strong>the</strong> prevention and control <strong>of</strong> zoonotic<br />

disease.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

This research has substantially improved our understanding <strong>of</strong> cryptosporidiosis in<br />

animals and <strong>the</strong> linkage with disease in humans. It has allowed <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong><br />

centre <strong>of</strong> expertise at <strong>the</strong> VLA and has also provided a basis for excellent collaboration<br />

between VLA and HPA in this important area.<br />

The projects were generally well devised and <strong>the</strong> methodologies employed in <strong>the</strong><br />

laboratory and <strong>the</strong> environment were appropriate. However, <strong>the</strong>re were differing opinions<br />

on <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> conclusions obtained. The number <strong>of</strong> novel and pertinent<br />

findings were fewer than had been expected from such a large project, which was using<br />

new molecular tools to identify genetic differences between C. parvum (which infects<br />

calves) and C. hominis (which was thought to infect only humans).<br />

One key finding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> studies was that isolates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> putative human-specific species C.<br />

hominis could readily reproduce in neonatal animals <strong>of</strong> three different mammalian<br />

livestock species: sheep, cattle and pigs. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, infections were observed in<br />

chickens and poultry. Matches were obtained between C. parvum sub-types isolated<br />

from humans and isolates from environmental samples from farms that <strong>the</strong> patient had<br />

visited. Significantly, particular species sub-types may be commonly associated with<br />

human infection. This shows that, in principle, molecular typing systems can be<br />

employed in epidemiological tracing studies. However, no link was obtained between<br />

infection <strong>of</strong> humans and infection in domestic pets including dogs.<br />

The risk assessment part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project was criticised on <strong>the</strong> grounds that <strong>the</strong> sample<br />

size was too small, and because a hypo<strong>the</strong>sis had not been properly identified. Overall,<br />

<strong>the</strong> risk assessment work had been difficult to assess because too little detail was<br />

provided.<br />

Some disappointment was expressed at <strong>the</strong> rate at which peer-reviewed publications<br />

were being produced. In particular, <strong>the</strong> discovery that C. hominis can grow in o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

species, including chickens, is a major finding that warranted rapid publication.<br />

66


Project code: OZ0405<br />

Project title: Genotypic and phenotypic comparison <strong>of</strong> Yersinia<br />

enterocolitica from humans and animals<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/05/2002<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 30/04/2005<br />

£245,488<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Veterinary Laboratories Agency<br />

Sub-contractor(s): Department <strong>of</strong> Infectious and Tropical Diseases,<br />

London School <strong>of</strong> Hygiene and Tropical Medicine<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

Many cattle, sheep and pigs in <strong>the</strong> UK are colonised with Yersinia enterocolitica, which<br />

can cause diarrhoea in humans but is also associated with more serious diseases. To<br />

investigate <strong>the</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> human yersiniosis, a phenotypic and genotypic comparison <strong>of</strong><br />

human and livestock strains was undertaken in collaboration with <strong>the</strong> HPA. Results<br />

indicated that 58% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> animal isolates and 53% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> human isolates were Biotype<br />

(BT)1a, which is considered ―non-pathogenic‖. BTs1b and 2-5 are considered<br />

―pathogenic‖. BT3 (O:5,27) was isolated from sheep (35%), pigs (22%) and cattle (4%)<br />

but was not detected in human isolates. Among <strong>the</strong> human strains, 24% were BT3 (O:9)<br />

and 19% BT4 (O:3). Only pigs (11%) carried BT3 (O:9) strains. To fur<strong>the</strong>r investigate <strong>the</strong><br />

relationship between human and animal isolates a AFLP-based genotyping technique<br />

was developed in collaboration with DFVF and applied to 88 representative strains. The<br />

strains separated into two distinct AFLP clusters; cluster A and cluster B (largely BTs2-4<br />

and BT1a respectively). Serotype-associated sub-clusters were observed. AFLP pr<strong>of</strong>iles<br />

indicated pigs and sheep as sources <strong>of</strong> human BT3 (O:9) and BT4 (O:3) infections<br />

respectively. Some strains causing human disease were undetected in livestock. Fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

genotyping was undertaken using a pan-Yersinia DNA micro-array in collaboration with<br />

LSHTM. Two distinct clades were observed reflecting <strong>the</strong> AFLP results and providing<br />

evidence <strong>of</strong> evolutionary trends in <strong>the</strong> Yersinia genus.<br />

The representative strains were also assayed for a range <strong>of</strong> virulence-associated<br />

properties. The results indicated that most isolates had <strong>the</strong> capacity to cause disease in<br />

humans on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> adherence, invasiveness and survival in macrophages but<br />

differences were observed in cytokine secretion induced in vitro between <strong>the</strong> ―nonpathogenic‖<br />

and ―pathogenic‖ strains.<br />

Only 3 non-invasiveness strains, were detected. All were BT1a were non-motile. This<br />

was fur<strong>the</strong>r investigated using site directed mutagenesis, for <strong>the</strong> first time, in a BT1a<br />

strain to construct a flagella-deficient mutant. The results suggest that flagella are<br />

important virulence factors for BT1a strains.<br />

Overall this project has significantly increased understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> Y.<br />

enterocolitica from livestock in human yersiniosis and indicated that BT1a strains are<br />

potentially pathogenic to humans.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

The project was developed following <strong>the</strong> collection <strong>of</strong> Yersinia isolates during <strong>the</strong> sheep,<br />

cattle and pig abattoir survey in 1999/2000. Yersinia enterocolitica is not a significant<br />

67


animal pathogen but is a human pathogen. The survey in 1999/2000 had indicated quite<br />

high prevalence <strong>of</strong> Yersinia enterocolitica in pigs (26%), less so in sheep (13%) and<br />

cattle (6%).The project has clarified which animal species were excreting isolates which<br />

are also pathogenic serotypes for humans. The research has developed a testing facility<br />

for Yersinia enterocolitica and contributed to <strong>the</strong> evidence base.<br />

The most important output has been <strong>the</strong> suggestion that more <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Yersinia<br />

enterocolitica strains present in livestock have <strong>the</strong> potential to pose a threat to human<br />

public health than was previously thought. The identification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> potential virulence <strong>of</strong><br />

BT1a strains is important as <strong>the</strong>se strains colonise a significant proportion <strong>of</strong> livestock.<br />

The study has generated a number <strong>of</strong> valuable publications, which advance knowledge<br />

in <strong>the</strong> subject area.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r research is not currently required in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> clear direction from<br />

medical/public health authorities that this is a sufficiently important area that merits<br />

additional work in animals. It would be more appropriate for FSA or DH to fund fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

work on understanding <strong>the</strong> pathogenicity for humans.<br />

68


Project code: OZ0404<br />

Project title: Bovine neosporosis: <strong>the</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> zoonotic risk<br />

and <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> evidence-based control<br />

strategies<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/11/2002<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/12/2005<br />

£242,267.00<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

The newly recognised protozoan parasite Neospora caninum has recently emerged as a<br />

major cause <strong>of</strong> disease in cattle and dogs worldwide (1). In cattle, research by various<br />

international groups, including our own laboratory in a previous DEFRA funded research<br />

project (Contract CSA 3618, 1996 - 1999), has shown <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> infection in<br />

<strong>the</strong> etiology <strong>of</strong> abortion and <strong>the</strong> significance <strong>of</strong> vertical transmission in its epidemiology.<br />

This project concentrated on <strong>the</strong> recently discovered oocyst stage <strong>of</strong> N. caninum. It<br />

sought to improve rational control measures in cattle by determining if, and under what<br />

circumstances, oocysts could infect pregnant cattle and cause disease, what risk factors<br />

exist and how likely are oocysts to infect <strong>the</strong> environment. The existence <strong>of</strong><br />

environmental contamination by oocysts also creates a potential zoonotic hazard which<br />

was evaluated in a large scale human serological study.<br />

The project failed to find any evidence <strong>of</strong> exposure to infection in over 3700 human<br />

serum samples rigorously selected and examined by two assays. The results show that<br />

<strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> human infection in <strong>the</strong> UK is extremely low and that millk and meat from UK<br />

cattle can be regarded as safe in this respect.<br />

In cattle, <strong>the</strong> project showed that oocyst infection in pregnancy can lead to abortion in<br />

cattle if exposure occurs around mid-pregnancy but not if it occurs early or late in<br />

pregnancy. However, exposure at 210 days in pregnancy led to high rates <strong>of</strong> congenital<br />

infection in healthy calves. Thus oocyst infection is likely to be extremely important in<br />

maintaining <strong>the</strong> basic reproductive rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parasite at >1 by creating infected females<br />

which are <strong>the</strong>n presumed to endogenously transplacentally infect all <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>of</strong>fspring.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

Overall <strong>the</strong> project has generated some important findings, specifically <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong><br />

evidence for human infection and zoonotic transmission, and <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> associated<br />

evidence that dogs were a major source <strong>of</strong> oocyst infection to cattle. Also important was<br />

that although oocysts can infect pregnant cows and cause abortion or congenital<br />

infection, epidemiological risk factors suggested that <strong>the</strong> likelihood <strong>of</strong> this occurring was<br />

low.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> this research have clearly answered <strong>the</strong> policy question on zoonotic risk<br />

and have shown that, if a zoonotic risk to humans exists in <strong>the</strong> UK, it is very low. The<br />

69


esearch has also substantially improved our understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> epidemiology <strong>of</strong><br />

Neospora caninum.<br />

There is no requirement for fur<strong>the</strong>r funding from this programme because <strong>the</strong> results<br />

have shown that <strong>the</strong> organism has no real zoonotic significance.<br />

The team have built up significant expertise on this parasite and it is for ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

programme to consider whe<strong>the</strong>r fur<strong>the</strong>r funding on purely animal health/animal welfare<br />

grounds might be justified.<br />

70


Campylobacter <strong>Research</strong> Projects<br />

Project code: OZ0604<br />

Project title: Characterisation <strong>of</strong> strain variation in Campylobacter<br />

jejuni.<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/04/1999<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 30/09/2004<br />

£774,549<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: University <strong>of</strong> Oxford<br />

Sub-contractor(s): HPA<br />

Project code: OZ0611<br />

Project title: Development <strong>of</strong> a comprehensive MLST database for<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter risk factors<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/07/2005<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 30/06/2008<br />

£503,312.00<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: University <strong>of</strong> Oxford<br />

Sub-contractor(s):<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

OZ0604<br />

Campylobacter species, particularly Campylobacter jejuni, are a major cause <strong>of</strong> human<br />

gastro-enteritis in <strong>the</strong> UK and elsewhere. In <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> infections, which are<br />

sporadic, <strong>the</strong> precise epidemiology is not determined, although several food producing<br />

animals have been implicated as important sources <strong>of</strong> infection. The epidemiology <strong>of</strong><br />

zoonotic transmission <strong>of</strong> C. jejuni to man remains obscure due to inconsistencies within<br />

and between <strong>the</strong> various phenotyping and molecular typing methods used to<br />

characterise C. jejuni isolates. These inconsistencies arise from <strong>the</strong> inability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

current methods to unambiguously define strain types and genetic lineages, and <strong>the</strong> lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> precise understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> variation which <strong>the</strong>y index. This work will address <strong>the</strong>se<br />

problems, definitively establishing <strong>the</strong> range and mechanisms <strong>of</strong> genetic variability in<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> C. jejuni, by <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most recently developed sequence<br />

typing technologies to a minimum <strong>of</strong> 1500 isolates, representative <strong>of</strong> those obtained from<br />

human infections, farm animals, <strong>the</strong> human food chain, and <strong>the</strong> environment. Multilocus<br />

sequence typing (MLST), which identifies strain relationships on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> neutral<br />

variation in housekeeping genes, and antigen gene sequence typing, which will be used<br />

71


to elucidate <strong>the</strong> antigenic repertoire <strong>of</strong> this bacterium at one antigen locus, will provide an<br />

accurate, comprehensive, and portable typing system for C. jejuni and related organisms,<br />

with a firm <strong>the</strong>oretical basis in bacterial population biology.<br />

OZ0611<br />

Campylobacter is <strong>the</strong> most common cause <strong>of</strong> bacterial infectious intestinal disease in <strong>the</strong><br />

UK. Although various risk factors for infection, including consumption <strong>of</strong> undercooked<br />

poultry or unpasteurised milk have been identified, <strong>the</strong> epidemiology <strong>of</strong> this disease<br />

remains poorly understood. This is because (i) outbreaks are rarely detected, hence<br />

valuable information on sources and transmission routes which is obtained from outbreak<br />

investigations is generally lacking, and (ii) Campylobacter genomes are genetically<br />

diverse, and unstable, with frequent inter and intragenomic recombination, toge<strong>the</strong>r with<br />

phase variation, which complicates <strong>the</strong> interpretation <strong>of</strong> data from many typing methods.<br />

However, a suitable typing techniqe is multilocus sequence typing (MLST). MLST for<br />

Campylobacter jejuni, toge<strong>the</strong>r with a comprehensive internet accessible MLST database<br />

(http://pubmlst.org/campylobacter/) was developed with DEFRA support (contract<br />

number: OZ0604). MLST <strong>of</strong>fers advantages over previous typing techniques including<br />

100% typeability, reproducibility, and <strong>the</strong> straightforward sharing <strong>of</strong> data via <strong>the</strong> internet.<br />

The Campylobacter MLST database now contains 4434 isolates (29 th May 2007) and<br />

provides a resource for <strong>the</strong> scientific, public health, and veterinary communities as well<br />

as <strong>the</strong> food industry. Database submissions are received from laboratories<br />

internationally. The database is curated to ensure quality control, and additional MLST<br />

schemes and databases have been set up for o<strong>the</strong>r Campylobacter species including C.<br />

coli, C. fetus and C. lari. If it is to continue, and undergo fur<strong>the</strong>r expansion, this program<br />

<strong>of</strong> work will require continued support.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

The work performed in OZ0604 and OZ0611 has been <strong>of</strong> fundamental importance in<br />

developing and applying a robust molecular typing method to Campylobacter. Adoption<br />

<strong>of</strong> MLST for Campylobacter at an international level demonstrates <strong>the</strong> strength <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

work performed.<br />

As OZ0611 comes to an end and fur<strong>the</strong>r work is considered, it is important that <strong>the</strong> MLST<br />

database is populated with campylobacters <strong>of</strong> public health importance. In addition, when<br />

selecting environmental isolates, quantity, source, geographical, and temporal factors<br />

must all be taken into account to ensure <strong>the</strong> database is not biased. The database must<br />

<strong>the</strong>n be interrogated to identify sources <strong>of</strong> human infection and <strong>the</strong>refore where<br />

interventions will have <strong>the</strong> greatest impact.<br />

72


Project code: OZ0605<br />

Project title: Genotypic and Phenotypic Instability <strong>of</strong><br />

Campylobacters from Environmental, Animal and<br />

Human Sources<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/08/1999<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/07/2002<br />

£298,279<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Veterinary Laboratories Agency<br />

Sub-contractor(s): Scottish Reference Laboratory for Campylobacters,<br />

Aberdeen<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Food</strong> Science, Queens University,<br />

Belfast<br />

Campylobacter Reference Unit, Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Enteric<br />

Pathogens, Central Public Health Laboratory (now<br />

Health Protection Agency), London<br />

Institute for Animal Science and Health, The<br />

Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

Campylobacters can only grow in a host, usually in <strong>the</strong> gut, and are considered very<br />

fragile organisms. However, <strong>the</strong>y are ubiquitous in <strong>the</strong> general environment, where <strong>the</strong>y<br />

survive a wide range <strong>of</strong> stresses, which may be potentially lethal. This conundrum is<br />

confounding for <strong>the</strong> investigation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> epidemiology <strong>of</strong> campylobacters in <strong>the</strong> poultry<br />

farm and meat production environments, particularly given <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> known<br />

mechanisms <strong>of</strong> stress adaptation in campylobacters. Genetic instability is a wellrecognised<br />

property <strong>of</strong> Campylobacters and has been proposed as a survival<br />

mechanism. In this project <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> genetic instability as a mechanism for stress<br />

survival and adaptation during exposure to <strong>the</strong> host gut was investigated.<br />

Genotypic and phenotypic instability occurred in about 20% <strong>of</strong> outbreak-related strains<br />

investigated and was most readily observed using <strong>the</strong> typing technique <strong>of</strong> PFGE. Such<br />

instability was detected as a change in banding patterns consistent with point mutations.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> apparent loss or gain <strong>of</strong> DNA fragments, including fragments <strong>of</strong> up to 50kb,<br />

was also detected, suggesting DNA insertion/deletion events. Never<strong>the</strong>less, some<br />

genotypically stable clones were also detectable. The mechanisms and role <strong>of</strong> genetic<br />

instability were investigated in a clonally-derived set <strong>of</strong> strains previously recovered from<br />

a single batch <strong>of</strong> poultry meat. Instability was induced by in vitro exposure to heat and<br />

cold stresses as well as frozen storage. Using a competition model <strong>of</strong> chick colonisation<br />

following oral challenge with multiple variants, evidence was obtained for a selective<br />

benefit in vivo for some variants. These results demonstrate that genetic instability is an<br />

important ecological property <strong>of</strong> campylobacters and that understanding <strong>of</strong> this property<br />

will be essential to <strong>the</strong> detection and control <strong>of</strong> this food<strong>borne</strong> pathogen.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

OZ0605 commenced at a time when little was known about <strong>the</strong> genetic variability <strong>of</strong><br />

Campylobacter spp. The researchers looked at a wide range <strong>of</strong> typing methodologies<br />

73


and have contributed to our understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> difficulties in typing campylobacters.<br />

This was important work which needed to be done. The project has confirmed that <strong>the</strong>re<br />

is no single ideal typing method that can be applied to every situation; a combination <strong>of</strong><br />

methods is <strong>of</strong>ten needed depending on <strong>the</strong> questions to be answered.<br />

74


Project code: OZ0607<br />

Project title: An investigation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distinguishing features <strong>of</strong> C.<br />

jejuni strains that have host/disease associations.<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/07/01<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 30/06/04<br />

£508,987<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Veterinary Laboratories Agency (Weybridge)<br />

Sub-contractor(s):<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

The attribution <strong>of</strong> poultry as <strong>the</strong> major source <strong>of</strong> human campylobacteriosis remains<br />

debatable. In order to inform risk assessment models, this project aimed to investigate<br />

<strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r livestock as potential sources and <strong>the</strong> possibility that all strains <strong>of</strong><br />

campylobacter were pathogenic for humans. A multi-pronged approach was <strong>the</strong>refore<br />

adopted to investigate <strong>the</strong> relationships between C.jejuni pathogenicity and host. Initial<br />

studies using higher disciminatory MLST-based approaches demonstrated that <strong>the</strong><br />

populations <strong>of</strong> C. jejuni from human cases and from colonised animals overlap<br />

significantly, indicating all veterinary campylobacters are potentially pathogenic to man.<br />

However, at least one host-associated cluster was evident in pigs. Additionally, genomic<br />

stability and instability were important factors in <strong>the</strong> ecology <strong>of</strong> this bacterial species.<br />

A second approach investigated <strong>the</strong> molecular pathogenesis <strong>of</strong> disease, in order to<br />

identify virulent and non-virulent organisms. In vitro assays indicated that <strong>the</strong>re were no<br />

obvious associations between genotype and putative campylobacter virulence properties,<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore, attempts were made to identify specific genetic markers <strong>of</strong> virulence. A<br />

transposon mutant library was produced and invasion-deficient mutants selected, which<br />

may provide future markers <strong>of</strong> invasiveness. Rapid molecular assays for screening CDT<br />

activity were developed and for <strong>the</strong> first time <strong>the</strong> immunogenicity <strong>of</strong> CDT was<br />

investigated using a novel neutralisation assay. Human anti-CDT antibodies were<br />

detectable in infected humans but no antibodies were detected in colonised chickens<br />

indicating a host-related specificity in response. Additionally significant progress was<br />

made on <strong>the</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> a fimbrial surface structure.<br />

Finally, a sentinel study was undertaken which demonstrated passage-associated<br />

changes in <strong>the</strong> genome sequence strain, NCTC11168, resulting in differences in chick<br />

colonisation, motility, morphology and invasiveness. Transcript analysis demonstrated<br />

changes in expression <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> genes involved with <strong>the</strong> adaptation to microaerobic<br />

growth. This work is <strong>of</strong> huge significance to <strong>the</strong> research community by clarifying <strong>the</strong><br />

importance <strong>of</strong> strain origin in virulence and physiological studies.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> summary<br />

At <strong>the</strong> start <strong>of</strong> project OZ0607 it was beginning to be recognised that poultry is not <strong>the</strong><br />

only source for human campylobacter infection, and not all strains <strong>of</strong> campylobacter are<br />

pathogenic to humans. In order to more accurately attribute disease source and identify<br />

potential control measures, indicators <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> relationships between strains, pathogenicity<br />

and host were required.<br />

75


Fundamental issues concerning <strong>the</strong> function <strong>of</strong> various parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Campylobacter<br />

genome were addressed in this project. The researchers explored many avenues, but<br />

due to <strong>the</strong> complexity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> genome it was difficult to draw definitive conclusions. The<br />

project demonstrated that <strong>the</strong> relationships between strains, pathogenicity, and host are<br />

complex, and it was not possible to identify unique markers. This type <strong>of</strong> research is<br />

essential, however, to improve our understanding gene function, which will assist in more<br />

focused typing systems in <strong>the</strong> future.<br />

76


Project code: OZ0606<br />

Project title: Protective immunity and competitive exclusion in<br />

development <strong>of</strong> effective intervention products for<br />

poultry.<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/04/2001<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/03/2004<br />

£232,145.00<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Veterinary Laboratories Agency<br />

Sub-contractor(s):<br />

Project code: OZ0614<br />

Project title: To develop vaccination approaches to <strong>the</strong> control <strong>of</strong><br />

Campylobacter in poultry.<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/04/2006<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/03/2009<br />

£267,629.00<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Veterinary Laboratories Agency<br />

Sub-contractor(s):<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

Campylobacter jejuni is <strong>the</strong> leading cause <strong>of</strong> bacterial enteritis in <strong>the</strong> UK. The handling<br />

and/or consumption <strong>of</strong> contaminated poultry meat is believed to be a risk factor. The<br />

avian intestine is considered <strong>the</strong> natural environment for <strong>the</strong> organism, and up to 90% <strong>of</strong><br />

poultry flocks in <strong>the</strong> UK are colonised asymptomatically. Thus, reduction or elimination <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> organism in poultry in order to reduce <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> human cases is an objective <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Defra</strong> and FSA. A number <strong>of</strong> intervention strategies have been proposed, including<br />

increased bio-security, vaccination and competitive exclusion (CE). Increased biosecurity<br />

alone has so far failed to consistently reduce <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> colonisation, so a<br />

multi-pronged approach would seem to <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>the</strong> most promise. Understanding host and<br />

bacterial factors associated with colonisation should enable <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> defined,<br />

targeted interventions. Early <strong>Defra</strong>-funded work at VLA (project OZ0129) demonstrated<br />

that, despite being considered a commensal in chickens, C. jejuni elicits strong humoral<br />

responses and that exposure can lead to a protective immunity. This work was fur<strong>the</strong>red<br />

in project OZ0606 by investigating <strong>the</strong> feasibility <strong>of</strong> vaccination. Work was also<br />

undertaken to identify bacterial factors essential for colonisation. In addition, following on<br />

from an earlier project (OZ0603) <strong>the</strong> potential for CE by homologous and heterologous<br />

organisms was investigated. Results from this project indicated that vaccination was an<br />

area worthy <strong>of</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r research, leading to <strong>the</strong> funding <strong>of</strong> OZ0614 which focuses entirely<br />

on this area <strong>of</strong> intervention.<br />

77


<strong>Review</strong> summary<br />

Project OZ0606 focused on <strong>the</strong> dynamics <strong>of</strong> intestinal colonisation <strong>of</strong> chickens with<br />

campylobacter, including <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> competitive exclusion and immune responses<br />

during colonisation. This project has demonstrated a clear link between maternal<br />

immunity and <strong>the</strong> colonisation lag phase in chicks, and also identified factors that could<br />

be used in control <strong>of</strong> campylobacter. OZ0606 has also increased knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong><br />

competitive exclusion products in <strong>the</strong> laboratory environment. The results from this<br />

project showed promise but unfortunately <strong>the</strong> researchers have had difficulty replicating<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir work in <strong>the</strong> subsequent project (OZ0614). This is a difficult research area, however<br />

<strong>the</strong> widespread nature <strong>of</strong> campylobacter, and <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> success in controlling this<br />

organism through biosecurity, highlights <strong>the</strong> necessity <strong>of</strong> progressing <strong>the</strong> vaccination<br />

approach.<br />

78


Project code: OZ0608<br />

Project title: Epidemiological studies and development <strong>of</strong> practical<br />

control measures for Campylobacter in broiler flocks<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/07/02<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 30/06/06<br />

£859,393<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Veterinary Laboratories Agency<br />

Sub-contractor(s): Co-contractor - University <strong>of</strong> Bristol<br />

Sub-contractor - Imperial College<br />

Project code: OZ0610<br />

Project title: Survival and persistence <strong>of</strong> campylobacters in poultry<br />

farm environments and suggested control measures<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/09/05<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/01/09<br />

£746,102.00<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: University <strong>of</strong> Bristol<br />

Sub-contractor(s): Co-contractor - VLA<br />

Sub-contractors - SAC, DTA Ltd<br />

Project code: OZ0613<br />

Project title: Towards risk-based control <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter:<br />

developing <strong>the</strong> evidence base using epidemiological<br />

and bacteriological approaches<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/01/06<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 30/09/10<br />

Total cost:<br />

£1,558,693 (<strong>Defra</strong>: £1,495,693; O<strong>the</strong>r funders:<br />

£200,000)<br />

Affiliation: Veterinary Laboratories Agency<br />

Sub-contractor(s):<br />

79


Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

OZ0608<br />

The adoption <strong>of</strong> on-farm control measures by <strong>the</strong> poultry industry is needed to reduce <strong>the</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter-infected birds that enter processing plants, and <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> human cases <strong>of</strong> campylobacteriosis associated with poultry meat<br />

consumption. Enhanced biosecurity on poultry farms would be expected to control o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

zoonoses, for example Salmonella, and improve <strong>the</strong> health, productivity and welfare <strong>of</strong><br />

poultry flocks. However, <strong>the</strong> epidemiology <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter in poultry is complex and<br />

<strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> suitable control strategies is problematic. This project was designed<br />

to meet this challenge by bringing toge<strong>the</strong>r scientists from a range <strong>of</strong> disciplines including<br />

bacteriology, epidemiology, statistics and socio-economics. A close collaboration with<br />

industry will ensure timely communication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> research outputs and that a sustainable,<br />

practical and cost-effective control package which is more likely to be adopted is<br />

developed. The diversity <strong>of</strong> poultry production systems (e.g., conventional, organic and<br />

free-range) will be addressed by <strong>the</strong> project.<br />

In project OZ0608 a novel intensive, retrospective environmental testing strategy was<br />

adopted, based on a design developed by DG Newell. A real-time PCR-based test was<br />

developed and validated to allow rapid identification <strong>of</strong> flock colonising C. jejuni/coli<br />

strains from DNA prepared from recovered colonies and aliquots <strong>of</strong> enriched cultures<br />

from flock and environmental samples. This test was implemented during a preliminary<br />

field study. Using a standardised sampling strategy, samples taken from <strong>the</strong> poultry<br />

house and surrounding farm environment at each visit during <strong>the</strong> crop cycle were<br />

enriched and plated, but in this new approach isolates and enriched cultures were <strong>the</strong>n<br />

stored at –80 o C until isolates were recovered from <strong>the</strong> faeces or caeca <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> target flock.<br />

A strain-specific probe was designed against <strong>the</strong> flock strain and used to screen DNA<br />

prepared from <strong>the</strong> strain(s) first isolated from <strong>the</strong> chickens and compared with traditional<br />

cultural isolation and characterisation <strong>of</strong> isolated colonies to determine potential sources<br />

<strong>of</strong> flock colonising campylobacters. This approach was <strong>the</strong>n used to determine potential<br />

sources <strong>of</strong> flock colonisation in a large scale study involving 26 target flocks on 15 farms.<br />

A practical control package was developed progressively throughout <strong>the</strong> project. A<br />

qualitative farmer survey to determine <strong>the</strong> attitudes to <strong>the</strong> control <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter in<br />

broiler flocks was conducted followed by a quantitative study <strong>of</strong> farmers‘ attitudes. Both<br />

surveys were carried out to gain information on (i) current farm practices (ii) biosecurity<br />

control measures currently in place and (iii) those that could be adopted as well as<br />

constraints to adoption. The cost-effectiveness <strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong> control measures were<br />

evaluated using standard techniques <strong>of</strong> cost-effectiveness analysis. Ten interventions,<br />

including hygiene barriers in anterooms, visitor restrictions, and <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> handwash and<br />

alcohol sprays were put into place on two farms to help provide information on adoption<br />

<strong>of</strong> control measures, effects on Campylobacter prevalence and time to establishment <strong>of</strong><br />

colonisation. Finally, a cross-sectional and longitudinal study was performed to<br />

determine differences in time to colonisation between conventional flocks and organic<br />

and free-range flocks. The information generated by <strong>the</strong>se activities, toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong><br />

Quantitative Risk Assessment and field studies were all used to inform <strong>the</strong> development<br />

<strong>of</strong> a workable and cost-effective control package.<br />

OZ0610<br />

80


Although enhanced biosecurity measures on farms appear to reduce colonisation <strong>of</strong><br />

flocks, <strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter positive flocks entering <strong>the</strong> processing plant<br />

remains high. Therefore it is necessary to identify strategies for on-farm interventions in<br />

order to reduce <strong>the</strong> total campylobacter load on farms and <strong>the</strong>ir ability to persist in <strong>the</strong><br />

bird until slaughter. To achieve this <strong>the</strong> reservoirs <strong>of</strong> campylobacters surviving or<br />

recycling within or re-entering <strong>the</strong> farm are being investigated. The impact <strong>of</strong> both abiotic<br />

and biotic environmental factors e.g bacteriophage, on campylobacter persistence in <strong>the</strong><br />

environment and <strong>the</strong>ir influence on colonisation and seasonality <strong>of</strong> campylobacter<br />

carriage in broiler flocks is being studied to improve <strong>the</strong> understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> survival<br />

mechanisms. In addition <strong>the</strong> ability to detect, identify and classify campylobacter strains<br />

in poultry farm environments is being advanced. Scientists from a range <strong>of</strong> disciplines<br />

including microbiology, with expertise in aerobiology, bacteriophage and bi<strong>of</strong>ilms in <strong>the</strong><br />

poultry environment, and poultry epidemiologists, specialising in veterinary, molecular<br />

characterisation, modelling, and risk analysis are involved in this project. This team is<br />

being aided by advice and collaboration with consultants <strong>of</strong> international standing from<br />

Denmark, Sweden, Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, USA and <strong>the</strong> UK. In-vivo chick modelling is being used<br />

to investigate <strong>the</strong> susceptibility <strong>of</strong> broilers to colonisation by campylobacters in<br />

environmental samples identified as potential reservoirs <strong>of</strong> infection. The studies are<br />

benefiting from <strong>the</strong> probe approach developed for project OZ0608 to identify sources<br />

associated with caecal campylobacter strains colonising <strong>the</strong> broiler flocks. Links<br />

identified by SVR sequence are being explored fur<strong>the</strong>r using MLST. On-going research<br />

projects at both participating institutes are informing this project while close collaboration<br />

with <strong>the</strong> poultry industry is ensuring rapid communication <strong>of</strong> research outputs and that<br />

strategies recommended will be adopted.<br />

OZ0613<br />

The work undertaken by project OZ0613 is a comprehensive package <strong>of</strong> multidisciplinary<br />

research aimed at supplying data on which to base practical policy decisions<br />

on <strong>the</strong> control <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter in broiler production.<br />

The laboratory and in-field validation work carried out in Objective 1 will provide<br />

sensitivity and specificity data on <strong>the</strong> Campylobacter Survey methodology (Objective 2).<br />

By determining <strong>the</strong>se data suitable correction factors can be applied to <strong>the</strong> apparent<br />

survey prevalence, via a modelling approach, to obtain an estimate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> true<br />

prevalence.<br />

The survey carried out in Objective 2 is <strong>the</strong> first survey on Campylobacter in broiler flocks<br />

at slaughter to be carried out in <strong>the</strong> UK on a national-scale. The survey has been based<br />

on <strong>the</strong> EU specifications and as such will meet <strong>the</strong> main requirements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU survey<br />

when it becomes mandatory (which is likely to be January 2008). By commencing <strong>the</strong><br />

survey in January 2007 <strong>the</strong> VLA has been able to trial <strong>the</strong> EU methodology and identify a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> issues which have been fed back to <strong>Defra</strong>. In addition to determining <strong>the</strong><br />

prevalence <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter in broiler flocks at slaughter, <strong>the</strong> research undertaken by<br />

<strong>the</strong> VLA will provide a valuable data set for investigating risk factors associated with flock<br />

prevalence. The survey also provides a valuable, epidemiologically robust, source <strong>of</strong><br />

samples which can be used for molecular epidemiological studies, particularly<br />

comparison with human strains by MLST or o<strong>the</strong>r suitable methods, and for antimicrobial<br />

resistance testing.<br />

Objective 3 focuses on more detailed epidemiological investigations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> depopulation<br />

process. This work is linked with an existing University <strong>of</strong> Bristol FSA project and will<br />

provide substantial added value by virtue <strong>of</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> strains from Bristol studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

81


thinning process for molecular tracking to elucidate <strong>the</strong> most important sources<br />

associated with flock colonisation. In addition, <strong>the</strong> whole chain <strong>of</strong> events from farm<br />

through to <strong>the</strong> slaughter process will be followed in a separate study to investigate <strong>the</strong><br />

sources <strong>of</strong> infection and contribution to Campylobacter load associated with clearance<br />

and transport. A number <strong>of</strong> exposure experiments will also be carried out in Objective 3<br />

to investigate <strong>the</strong> survival and colonisation potential <strong>of</strong> environmental strains.<br />

All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> above work will provide good quality data with which to update <strong>the</strong> VLA risk<br />

assessment model (Objective 4).<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

OZ0608 was an ambitious project which has moved our understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

environmental sources <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter on <strong>the</strong> poultry farm forward considerably. The<br />

team also developed a PCR screening test for strain-specific detection <strong>of</strong><br />

Campylobacter, enabling detection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> organism where traditional methods failed.<br />

While <strong>the</strong>re were data deficiencies in <strong>the</strong> Quantitative Risk Assessment, it proved useful<br />

in <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> practical interventions, and data ga<strong>the</strong>red from OZ0610 and<br />

OZ0613 will be used to update <strong>the</strong> model.<br />

Following on from OZ0608, project OZ0610 aims to investigate <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> environmental<br />

survival, reservoirs <strong>of</strong> infection, and recycling systems, both on or entering <strong>the</strong> farm, in<br />

<strong>the</strong> colonisation <strong>of</strong> broiler flocks with C. jejuni. A vast amount <strong>of</strong> data has been collected<br />

by <strong>the</strong> team, which has yet to be fully analysed, in order to identify badly needed<br />

intervention measures for <strong>the</strong> poultry industry.<br />

Building on both OZ0608 and OZ0610, project OZ0613 will continue to advance<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> farm situation, environmental stresses, and seasonality that may<br />

adversely affect campylobacters and be used in control. The project includes <strong>the</strong> first UK<br />

survey <strong>of</strong> campylobacters in broilers at slaughter meeting recommendations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Advisory Committee on <strong>the</strong> Microbiological Safety <strong>of</strong> <strong>Food</strong>, and <strong>the</strong> EU requirement for a<br />

survey from January 2008. It is anticipated that this project will significantly contribute to<br />

<strong>the</strong> campylobacter evidence base and provide valuable data on which future costeffective<br />

controls can be based.<br />

All three projects in this cluster have benefited from a close working relationship with <strong>the</strong><br />

FSA and industry. Such collaboration is also invaluable in ensuring findings and<br />

recommendations from research projects are implemented on farms.<br />

82


Project code: OZ0609<br />

Project title: Determining <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> maternal antibodies in <strong>the</strong> lag<br />

phase <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter jejuni infection in chickens.<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/05/2005<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/05/2006<br />

£50,012<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Veterinary Laboratories Agency<br />

Sub-contractor(s):<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

Campylobacter jejuni is <strong>the</strong> leading cause <strong>of</strong> bacterial enteritis in <strong>the</strong> UK. The handling<br />

and/or consumption <strong>of</strong> contaminated poultry meat is believed to be a risk factor. The<br />

avian intestine is considered <strong>the</strong> natural environment for <strong>the</strong> organism, and up to 90% <strong>of</strong><br />

poultry flocks in <strong>the</strong> UK are colonised asymptomatically. Thus, reduction or elimination <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> organism in poultry in order to reduce <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> human cases is an objective <strong>of</strong><br />

DEFRA and FSA. A number <strong>of</strong> intervention strategies have been proposed, including<br />

increased bio-security, vaccination and competitive exclusion. Increased bio-security<br />

alone has so far failed to consistently reduce <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> colonisation, so a multipronged<br />

approach would seem to <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>the</strong> most promise. Commercial birds tend to<br />

exhibit a lag-phase <strong>of</strong> infection, wherein <strong>the</strong>y usually remain uncolonised during <strong>the</strong> first<br />

2-3 weeks <strong>of</strong> life. Thereafter <strong>the</strong> organism spreads rapidly through <strong>the</strong> flock. The lagphase<br />

represents a window-<strong>of</strong>-opportunity to apply intervention strategies. Moreover,<br />

understanding <strong>the</strong> under-lying mechanisms could help in <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> successful<br />

strategies. One likely contributory factor to <strong>the</strong> lag-phase, maternally-derived immunity,<br />

was investigated. Previous DEFRA-funded work indicated that <strong>the</strong> susceptibility <strong>of</strong><br />

commercial birds to colonisation is inversely proportional to <strong>the</strong> levels <strong>of</strong> anti-C. jejuni<br />

antibodies present in <strong>the</strong> chicks. These antibodies are vertically transmitted from infected<br />

breeder hens. Their levels decline to background during <strong>the</strong> first 3-4 weeks <strong>of</strong> life. The<br />

role <strong>of</strong> maternal immunity was studied by looking at <strong>the</strong> susceptibilities to colonisation <strong>of</strong><br />

chicks derived from SPF and commercial flocks and from experimental hens colonised<br />

and uncolonised by C. jejuni.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> summary<br />

The role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> humoral antibody response, including passive transfer <strong>of</strong> maternal<br />

antibodies, remains unclear, making development <strong>of</strong> a vaccine to prevent poultry<br />

colonisation with Campylobacter more difficult. This project has contributed to filling this<br />

knowledge gap, confirming that maternal antibodies play a role in <strong>the</strong> colonisation lag<br />

phase, but that o<strong>the</strong>r unknown factors are also involved. It has also shown that any<br />

exposure <strong>of</strong> very young chicks to campylobacter will result in colonisation. The results <strong>of</strong><br />

this work have assisted in formulation <strong>of</strong> policy, suggesting that attempting to keep<br />

breeding stock free <strong>of</strong> campylobacter may not be a useful strategy in <strong>the</strong> effort to reduce<br />

human campylobacteriosis.<br />

83


Project code: LK0665<br />

Project title: Improving gut health and nutrient capture <strong>of</strong> broiler<br />

chickens through selection for innate immune function<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/01/2006<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/12/2008<br />

Total cost:<br />

£351, 814 ( <strong>Defra</strong>: £174,813, O<strong>the</strong>r funders:<br />

£177,001)<br />

Affiliation: Institute for Animal Health, Compton<br />

Sub-contractor(s):<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

The UK poultry industry faces numerous challenges in order to remain sustainable.<br />

These include <strong>the</strong> imminent move to more extensive rearing systems; <strong>the</strong> withdrawal <strong>of</strong><br />

prophylactic and many <strong>the</strong>rapeutic antibiotics, and o<strong>the</strong>r drugs such as anti-coccidials;<br />

resistance and residue problems with anti-helminthics. These challenges will all have an<br />

impact on poultry health, but also have <strong>the</strong> potential to impact on human health, as<br />

increased incidence <strong>of</strong> food-<strong>borne</strong> zoonotic pathogens in chickens, for example, has <strong>the</strong><br />

potential to lead to an increase in <strong>the</strong>se diseases in man, It is important that poultry<br />

breeders are able to select for genetic improvement in performance when birds are<br />

reared in such environments, which should also lead to improvements in nutrient capture.<br />

This programme will seek to<br />

- provide a bridge between conventional positional (QTL) and physiological candidate<br />

gene approaches to identify genes controlling variation in innate immune responses<br />

- define <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> genetic variability in loci that influence <strong>the</strong> innate immune response<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chicken and relate this to resistance/susceptibility to Salmonella and<br />

Campylobacter, and also <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se variations on nutrient capture<br />

- determine <strong>the</strong> relevance in commercial broiler populations <strong>of</strong> genetic variation in<br />

immune response found in inbred research lines<br />

- provide new opportunities for selective breeding <strong>of</strong> commercial broilers for improved<br />

innate resistance to enteric disease and hence improved nutrient capture and food safety<br />

<strong>Review</strong> summary<br />

The main aim <strong>of</strong> this project is to increase innate immunity in broilers, and thus increase<br />

resistance to low-level pathogens in <strong>the</strong> environment. This supports <strong>the</strong> sustainable<br />

approach to disease control. If commercial lines <strong>of</strong> chickens which are resistant to<br />

salmonella and/or campylobacter infection become available it could have a major impact<br />

on this reservoir <strong>of</strong> infection.<br />

It is too early to say whe<strong>the</strong>r this approach will be a success. At <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> review this<br />

project was only 50% completed and had suffered some delays, however, access to new<br />

equipment should enable <strong>the</strong> time to be recovered.<br />

84


Project code: OZ0612<br />

Project title: The epidemiology <strong>of</strong> campylobacter infection in dogs<br />

in <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> risk to humans<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 18/07/2005<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 16/07/2008<br />

£228,351<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool<br />

Sub-contractor(s):<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

Campylobacter is <strong>the</strong> most common bacterial cause <strong>of</strong> human gastroenteritis in England<br />

and Wales. Most cases are due to Campylobacter jejuni infection, although C. coli and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r species including C. upsaliensis may also be involved. Most cases <strong>of</strong><br />

campylobacteriosis in man are non-epidemic, and <strong>the</strong>re tends to be a higher prevalence<br />

in children. Poultry meat has always been considered to be a major source <strong>of</strong> human<br />

campylobacteriosis, but campylobacter are also found in a number <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r species,<br />

including dogs. The prevalence <strong>of</strong> infection in dogs appears to be high (up to 56%) and<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is evidence that dogs may be a risk factor for human infection. Humans have<br />

frequent contact with dogs and dog faeces, and clearly where faecal pathogens such as<br />

campylobacter are present <strong>the</strong>re may be considerable opportunities for zoonotic<br />

transmission.<br />

This proposal addresses <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> human campylobacter infection from dogs. Although<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is epidemiological evidence <strong>of</strong> an association between campylobacter in dogs and<br />

disease in humans, <strong>the</strong>re is little information on specific risk factors for this. Specifically,<br />

we will<br />

• determine <strong>the</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> campylobacter carriage in dogs in a community-based<br />

census study, in selected kennel populations and in <strong>the</strong> wider population. • identify risk<br />

factors associated with campylobacter carriage in dogs, including human, household,<br />

and management variables.<br />

• determine <strong>the</strong> population structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> campylobacter isolates from dogs in relation<br />

to human strains. C.jejuni isolates will be examined in collaboration with Dr K Dingle,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oxford.<br />

The study will also provide a resource for small animal infectious disease surveillance.<br />

More specifically we will<br />

• create a microbiological and epidemiological data archive which could be used, with<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r funding, as a surveillance resource for o<strong>the</strong>r zoonotic, or potentially zoonotic<br />

canine faecal pathogens. In this context it has been agreed with <strong>Defra</strong> that as part <strong>of</strong> this<br />

project <strong>the</strong> samples will be screened for Salmonella spp.<br />

• provide added value to <strong>the</strong> contact network studies between dogs, and dogs and<br />

humans already funded by VLA/<strong>Defra</strong> (PU/T/PSC/04(22)).<br />

• produce a template for future surveillance studies on small animal pathogens, both in<br />

kennelled populations and in <strong>the</strong> community.<br />

• provide a small animal project input into <strong>the</strong> proposed National Centre for Zoonosis<br />

<strong>Research</strong>, to be based at <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool.<br />

85


<strong>Review</strong> summary<br />

While poultry meat is generally accepted as <strong>the</strong> primary source <strong>of</strong> infection for cases <strong>of</strong><br />

human campylobacteriosis, <strong>the</strong>re is also evidence to suggest that a significant proportion<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se infections originate from alternative sources. The primary aim <strong>of</strong> this project was<br />

to determine carriage <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter spp. by <strong>the</strong> UK dog population, and any risk this<br />

may cause to human health.<br />

Results to-date indicate that dogs are not an important source <strong>of</strong> C. jejuni or C. coli, <strong>the</strong><br />

common cause <strong>of</strong> infection in humans. C. upsaliensis was <strong>the</strong> most common<br />

campylobacter species detected in dogs. While this organism is zoonotic, it is recovered<br />

much less frequently from human campylobacter infections.<br />

86


Project code:<br />

VTEC O157 <strong>Research</strong> Projects<br />

OZ0703<br />

Project title: Plant antibody delivery <strong>of</strong> passive immunisation<br />

against E. coli O157:H7: a novel means <strong>of</strong> control in<br />

<strong>the</strong> animal<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/09/1999<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 01/06/2003<br />

£354,108<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Veterinary Laboratories Agency<br />

Sub-contractor(s): ADAS Consulting<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

Biology Department, University <strong>of</strong> Leicester<br />

Intimin, TIR and EspA proteins are expressed by Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli O157:H7.<br />

EspA proteins are part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> type three secretion system needle complex that delivers<br />

TIR to <strong>the</strong> host epi<strong>the</strong>lial cell whilst surface arrayed intimin docks <strong>the</strong> bacterium to <strong>the</strong><br />

translocated TIR. This process leads to intimate attachment resulting in attaching and<br />

effacing lesions which are essential for colonisation and persistence in ruminants.<br />

Recombinant forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se effector proteins from E. coli O157:H7 were produced and<br />

used to elicit immune responses in rabbits and immune phage-display antibody libraries<br />

were produced. Screening <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se immune libraries by phage-antibody panning and<br />

colony filter screening produced a panel <strong>of</strong> antibodies with specificity for EspA or intimin.<br />

Antibodies recognising different C-terminal epitopes on intimin bound specifically to <strong>the</strong><br />

gamma intimin <strong>of</strong> O157:H7 and not to o<strong>the</strong>r classes <strong>of</strong> intimin whereas antibodies raised<br />

against EspA recognised EspA analogues from o<strong>the</strong>r serotypes also. Anti-intimin<br />

antibodies were also produced as fusion proteins coupled to <strong>the</strong> reporter molecule<br />

alkaline phosphatase, allowing <strong>the</strong> one-step detection <strong>of</strong> γ-intimin. The isolated<br />

recombinant monoclonal antibodies were functional in a range <strong>of</strong> assay formats including<br />

ELISA, Western blot and dot blots demonstrating diagnostic potential.<br />

We assessed whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>se antibody constructs could be used to disrupt <strong>the</strong> intimate<br />

association <strong>of</strong> E. coli O157:H7 with <strong>the</strong> host cell but nei<strong>the</strong>r anti-γ intimin or anti-EspA<br />

antibodies did so although <strong>the</strong> anti-EspA antibodies significantly reduced <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> E.<br />

coli O157:H7-induced host cell actin rearrangement. In tests with traditionally made<br />

antibodies, both monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies completely blocked adherence<br />

and cytoskeletal changes within <strong>the</strong> host cell. Both polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies<br />

could be used to label E. coli O157 EspA filaments and <strong>the</strong>se immunoreagents did not<br />

inhibit <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> such filaments. This is <strong>the</strong> first report <strong>of</strong> monoclonal antibodies to<br />

EspA capable <strong>of</strong> disrupting <strong>the</strong> TTSS function <strong>of</strong> E. coli O157:H7.<br />

87


<strong>Review</strong> summary<br />

A key aim <strong>of</strong> this project was to express recombinant antibodies in edible crop plants, to<br />

facilitate <strong>the</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> passive immunisation against Escherichia coli O157:H7 to<br />

mucosal surfaces <strong>of</strong> livestock. Recombinant antibodies were produced, however <strong>the</strong>se<br />

were less protective against E. coli O157 adherence factors than traditionally produced<br />

antibodies. As a consequence, <strong>the</strong> assays with transgenic plants were not performed.<br />

This was an ambitious project which was more in <strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> pure research ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

applied research, however, it fitted well with <strong>the</strong> <strong>Defra</strong> request at <strong>the</strong> time for novel<br />

control methodologies. The work was useful preliminary research to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

immunisation might be an option.<br />

88


Project code: OZ 0704<br />

Project title: Quantification <strong>of</strong> E. coli O157:H7 virulence factors in<br />

vivo using real-time RT-PCR<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/06/1999<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 30/09/2002<br />

£200,764<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Dept. Vet. Pathology, University <strong>of</strong> Glasgow<br />

Sub-contractor(s): None<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

The asymtomatic carrier bovine is a major reservoir <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> food <strong>borne</strong> zoonotic E.coli<br />

O157:H7. Previous studies have shown that an individual animal may shed organisms<br />

intermittently throughout life and that infection/colonisation can be cleared but that <strong>the</strong><br />

same animal can also become reinfected. The main site <strong>of</strong> carriage in <strong>the</strong> adult bovine is<br />

<strong>the</strong> colon although organisms have been described colonising o<strong>the</strong>r regions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

alimentary tract in <strong>the</strong> adult carrier animal. E.coli O157:H7 has been reported to cause<br />

disease in young calves and we have recently identified O157 organisms attached to<br />

intestinal epi<strong>the</strong>lium in an adult cow with pr<strong>of</strong>use bloody diarrhoea.<br />

Various virulence determinants - VT1, VT2, intimin, fimbrae - have been identified by<br />

culturing E.coli O157 in vitro and in studies using mutated organisms. However, whilst<br />

<strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se determinants in pathogenicity has been established, <strong>the</strong> precise<br />

molecular events associated with colonisation, persistence <strong>of</strong> infection/carriage and<br />

clearance <strong>of</strong> carriage have not been determined. In this project we will apply <strong>the</strong> new<br />

and exciting technology <strong>of</strong> real-time, convential PCR and RT-PCR to quantitate <strong>the</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> organisms and <strong>the</strong> expression <strong>of</strong> mRNAs for various virulence factor produced<br />

by E.coli O157:H7 organisms in vivo. This will be combined with in situ RT-PCR<br />

techniques to obtain a detailed understanding <strong>of</strong> microbial gene expression during<br />

colonisation/ attachment/carriage in <strong>the</strong> bovine alimentary tract.<br />

Thus we will use modern molecular techniques to obtain a clearer understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> infection and pathogenesis (expression <strong>of</strong> virulence determinants in vivo)<br />

<strong>of</strong> E.coli O157:H7 in cattle. These data would underpin future studies investigating in<br />

detail host responses in <strong>the</strong> carrier animal, relating <strong>the</strong>se to microbial virulence factors<br />

and host-pathogen interactions. The overall aim <strong>of</strong> this approach is to devise strategies<br />

leading to reduction/elimination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> E.coli O157:H7 carrier state in cattle.<br />

These studies <strong>the</strong>refore address MAFF policy relating to MAFF Strategic <strong>Research</strong><br />

Requirements to obtain a clearer understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distrubution <strong>of</strong> infection,<br />

pathology, colonisation, host specificity and virulence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> E.coli O157:H7 bacterium in<br />

animals. Such knowledge is essential to <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> preventative and control<br />

measures for O157 infection <strong>of</strong> animals, <strong>the</strong>reby reducing food contamination and <strong>the</strong><br />

incidence <strong>of</strong> O157 food poisoning in man.<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se techniques for E.coli O157:H7 could also form <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong><br />

investigating host-pathogen interactions <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r food <strong>borne</strong> zoonoses at <strong>the</strong> molecular<br />

level.<br />

89


<strong>Review</strong> summary<br />

This project aimed to develop real time PCR techniques to identify and quantify virulence<br />

factors produced by E. coli O157 in <strong>the</strong> animal, and to study interactions between <strong>the</strong><br />

organism and host cells at <strong>the</strong> molecular level.<br />

The project suffered from a number <strong>of</strong> delays and difficulties, not least <strong>the</strong> outbreak <strong>of</strong><br />

FMD in 2001. Only a minor part <strong>of</strong> this project was realised in <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> real<br />

time PCR, however this was not tested in animals and <strong>the</strong> method has not been<br />

published. While reviewers acknowledged some genuine setbacks for <strong>the</strong> research team<br />

<strong>the</strong>y felt alternative approaches could have been used. OZ0704 did not <strong>the</strong>refore rate<br />

well with <strong>the</strong> reviewers.<br />

90


Project code: OZ0705<br />

Project title: A Proteomic Approach to Identify Virulence<br />

Determinants <strong>of</strong> EHEC 0157.<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/08/1999<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 12/09/2002<br />

£237,995<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: University <strong>of</strong> Southampton<br />

Sub-contractor(s): VLA<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

Escherichia coli O157:H7 (EHECO157) is a major food-<strong>borne</strong> pathogen in <strong>the</strong> UK,<br />

potentially fatal to <strong>the</strong> young, elderly and immunocompromised, and <strong>the</strong> leading cause <strong>of</strong><br />

acute kidney failure in children. The cited sources are bovine-derived meat and milk,<br />

direct contact with infected bovines and human-to-human contact while o<strong>the</strong>r sources,<br />

especially ovine ones are becoming a cause for concern. Epidemiological studies<br />

indicate a significant prevalence <strong>of</strong> E. coli O157:H7 in healthy cattle, with evidence for<br />

persistence resulting in long-term sporadic excretion and seasonal infection. The<br />

mechanisms by which cattle are colonised and <strong>the</strong> factors affecting persistence are not<br />

understood. Oral infection <strong>of</strong> neonate calves results in so-called attaching and effacing<br />

gut lesions but this is strain-dependant. Moreover, older animals do not display such<br />

lesions implying that o<strong>the</strong>r genetic determinants are likely to be responsible for<br />

persistence. Given that <strong>the</strong> genome <strong>of</strong> EHEC O157 is some 20 % larger than that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

laboratory strain K-12, <strong>the</strong>re is considerable genetic capacity for novel pathogenic<br />

determinants and some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se loci are likely to contribute to persistence. The key aim<br />

<strong>of</strong> this proposal was to utilise a sensitive and rapid proteomic approach to identify novel<br />

proteins and <strong>the</strong>ir encoding genes that are induced in <strong>the</strong> bovine gut. This information<br />

will enable <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> preventative and control measures against this pathogen.<br />

The key aim <strong>of</strong> this proposal was to utilise a sensitive and rapid proteomic approach to<br />

identify novel proteins and <strong>the</strong>ir encoding genes that are induced in <strong>the</strong> bovine gut. This<br />

information will enable <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> preventative and control measures against<br />

this pathogen.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> summary<br />

This proposal used <strong>the</strong> proteomic approach to identify novel proteins and <strong>the</strong>ir encoding<br />

genes that are induced in <strong>the</strong> bovine gut, with <strong>the</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> developing preventative and<br />

control measures against EHEC O157.<br />

The project developed and applied a number <strong>of</strong> methods for <strong>the</strong> investigation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

virulence and physiology <strong>of</strong> EHEC in <strong>the</strong> gut. While <strong>the</strong> results were not applicable to<br />

<strong>Defra</strong> policy, <strong>the</strong> research progressed <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> proteomics in this area.<br />

91


Project code: OZ0709<br />

Project title: Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> VTEC 0157 and o<strong>the</strong>r VTECs likely<br />

to be pathogenic to man in farm wastes<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/04/2002<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/03/2005<br />

£365,493<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Veterinary Laboratories Agency<br />

Sub-contractor(s): Health Protection Agency, Silsoe <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

Possible routes <strong>of</strong> human infection <strong>of</strong> Verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC)<br />

serogroup O157 include contaminated food or beverages, direct and indirect contact with<br />

farm animals and person-to-person. In particular, cattle have been identified as a major<br />

domestic animal reservoir <strong>of</strong> VTEC O157 and <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong>ir manure can be a source <strong>of</strong><br />

pathogens entering <strong>the</strong> environment and food chain. Consequently, <strong>the</strong> epidemiology <strong>of</strong><br />

VTEC O157 in farmyard manure (FYM), slurry and dirty water on both dairy and beef<br />

cattle farms was investigated. The overall aim <strong>of</strong> Project OZ0709 was to devise a set <strong>of</strong><br />

recommendations that can be adopted by farmers in order to reduce <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> human<br />

VTEC infection that is attributable to farm waste. To formulate such recommendations, a<br />

multi-disciplinary approach was adopted which included a review <strong>of</strong> existing farm waste<br />

management methods; an epidemiological study; engineering visits, risk assessment &<br />

ma<strong>the</strong>matical modelling.<br />

From <strong>the</strong> project it was concluded that <strong>the</strong> management <strong>of</strong> waste significantly varies<br />

between farms, however <strong>the</strong>re are recommendations/guidelines available to which<br />

farmers should adhere. Such recommendations are <strong>of</strong>ten with particular reference to <strong>the</strong><br />

transfer <strong>of</strong> food-<strong>borne</strong> pathogens on to crops and are <strong>the</strong>refore not VTEC O157 specific.<br />

By identifying specific VTEC O157 recommendations from within <strong>the</strong> project it was<br />

concluded that farmers adhering to existing guidelines are managing <strong>the</strong>ir waste in such<br />

a way that minimises <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> environmental contamination with VTEC and hence<br />

maintaining a low risk <strong>of</strong> humans becoming infected with VTEC O157 due to direct or<br />

indirect exposure to cattle waste.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> summary<br />

Project OZ0709 aimed to produce guidelines for farmers on ways to minimise <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong><br />

environmental contamination with VTEC, and consequently reduce <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> humans<br />

becoming infected with VTEC O157 through direct or indirect exposure to cattle waste.<br />

The results back up what had been previously thought. This project produced valuable<br />

data in providing assurance that current guidelines for management <strong>of</strong> farm waste are<br />

appropriate.<br />

92


Project code: OZ 0711<br />

Project title: Incidence and control <strong>of</strong> VTEC in animal feeds<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/08/2002<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/01/2005<br />

£132,343<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: ADAS UK Ltd<br />

Sub-contractor(s): Direct Laboratory Services Ltd<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

This study consisted <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> following tasks:<br />

Task 1: Scientific literature review. This summarised published and unpublished<br />

information on <strong>the</strong> incidence <strong>of</strong> VTEC and stx-harbouring phages in animal feeds. The<br />

report was submitted to <strong>Defra</strong> in December 2003.<br />

Task 2: An examination <strong>of</strong> imported feeds to determine <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir contamination<br />

with VTEC. Imported feeds were supplied from importing mills or feed manufacturers.<br />

Task 3: An assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> potential effect <strong>of</strong> manufacture on <strong>the</strong> viability <strong>of</strong> E. coli<br />

O157. The effects <strong>of</strong> heat-treatment – reflecting conditions under commercial compound<br />

feed manufacture - on a mixture <strong>of</strong> E. coli O157 isolates existing in ground and pelleted<br />

cattle feed were studied. This task was completed under laboratory-controlled conditions.<br />

Task 4: Determine <strong>the</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> VTEC in farm-stored and trough-fed feeds.<br />

Feeds taken from stores and feeding troughs on farms were analysed for E. coli O157<br />

and o<strong>the</strong>r VTEC strains to assess <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>the</strong>se pose to <strong>the</strong> spread <strong>of</strong> VTEC. Analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

feeds from troughs and on-ground feed passages, which were recently accessed by<br />

livestock, indicated that VTEC are likely to be spread via animal‘s mouths.<br />

Task 5: Determine <strong>the</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> VTEC in forages fed fresh on farms<br />

Forage crops (e.g. fresh grass, maize silage and grass silage), which were grown in<br />

fields where livestock had been grazing, were sampled and analysed for VTEC strains. A<br />

mini-silo study was undertaken using forage maize to study <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> ensiling on <strong>the</strong><br />

presence <strong>of</strong> VTEC isolates.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> summary<br />

This study aimed to determine any impact which animal feeds may make to <strong>the</strong><br />

transmission <strong>of</strong> VTEC, and to identify practices in feed production that may contribute to<br />

or reduce <strong>the</strong> levels <strong>of</strong> VTEC in livestock feeds. The results are what might have been<br />

expected, indicating that feeds are unlikely to be a significant transmission route for<br />

VTEC in <strong>the</strong> UK. It was, however, important to fund this work to obtain this evidence.<br />

While <strong>the</strong> work has contributed to <strong>the</strong> evidence base, it would have been <strong>of</strong> more value if<br />

<strong>the</strong> problems in obtaining representative feeds had been overcome and more feeds had<br />

been investigated.<br />

93


Project code: OZ0712<br />

Project title: Escherichia coli O157 interventions and control<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/04/2003<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 30/09/2006<br />

£503,523<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: SAC<br />

Sub-contractor(s): University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

BioSS<br />

Verocytotoxin producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) serotype O157:H7 is a significant<br />

infectious intestinal disease pathogen that can cause a severe and potentially fatal illness<br />

in humans. The main reservoir <strong>of</strong> E. coli O157 is <strong>the</strong> gastrointestinal tract <strong>of</strong> cattle, and<br />

<strong>the</strong> overall size <strong>of</strong> this animal reservoir is a major determinant <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> threat that <strong>the</strong><br />

organism poses to public health.<br />

Our group have made significant advances in understanding <strong>the</strong> persistence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

organism in <strong>the</strong> bovine host and identified <strong>the</strong> terminal rectum as <strong>the</strong> primary site for<br />

colonisation associated with persistent and high level excretion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> organism. The<br />

primary objective <strong>of</strong> study OZ0712 is to understand this colonisation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> terminal<br />

rectum and to examine treatments or interventions to reduce or prevent carriage at <strong>the</strong><br />

site. Practical control strategies may be developed from <strong>the</strong> understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

bacterial-host interactions that allow E. coli O157:H7 to persist on <strong>the</strong> rectal mucosa or<br />

from <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> methods that treat or prevent colonisation. Opportunity will also<br />

be taken to validate simple screening tests that could be used in <strong>the</strong> field or abattoir to<br />

identify colonised animals.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> summary<br />

This project aimed to acquire knowledge <strong>of</strong> how E. coli O157:H7 persists in <strong>the</strong> GI tract<br />

<strong>of</strong> cattle, and to use this information to develop practical methods for detection and<br />

control.<br />

The research team have significantly contributed to our understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> persistence<br />

<strong>of</strong> E. coli O157:H7 in <strong>the</strong> bovine host, and in identifying <strong>the</strong> terminal rectum as <strong>the</strong><br />

primary site for colonisation. A simple dip stick method was also developed for detection<br />

<strong>of</strong> high level faecal carriage <strong>of</strong> this organism. Direct application <strong>of</strong> chlorhexidine to <strong>the</strong><br />

terminal rectal mucosa was found to be <strong>the</strong> most effective treatment investigated. This<br />

treatment was able to reduce or completely eliminate E. coli O157:H7 and has <strong>the</strong><br />

potential to be an important control option. The development <strong>of</strong> this practical intervention<br />

is being taken forward in project OZ0714 (To develop a cost effective and practical<br />

method to reduce E. coli O157 infection in cattle prior to slaughter).<br />

94


Project code: LK0666<br />

Project title: Vaccination strategies for control <strong>of</strong><br />

enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in<br />

cattle<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/10/2005<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 30/09/2008<br />

Total cost:<br />

£628,763.00 (<strong>Defra</strong>: £328,762; O<strong>the</strong>r funders:<br />

£300,001)<br />

Affiliation: University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh<br />

Sub-contractor(s): SAC, MRI<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

A consortium <strong>of</strong> scientists based <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh, <strong>the</strong> Moredun <strong>Research</strong><br />

Institute and <strong>the</strong> Scottish Agricultural College working in partnership with Novartis Animal<br />

Vaccines Limited propose a three year LINK research programme that has two related<br />

aims. The first is to develop an effective and inexpensive vaccine to limit EHEC<br />

colonisation <strong>of</strong> cattle and <strong>the</strong>refore reduce <strong>the</strong> threat to human health from this pathogen.<br />

The second is to develop systems for delivery <strong>of</strong> antigens to gastrointestinal follicleassociated<br />

epi<strong>the</strong>lium in order to generate appropriate mucosal responses.<br />

The two aims are intrinsically linked as <strong>the</strong> antigens to be trialed in <strong>the</strong> vaccines are likely<br />

also to target FAE and will be tested to compare intra-muscular injection with mucosal<br />

delivery. This research builds on five years <strong>of</strong> research into EHEC colonisation <strong>of</strong> cattle<br />

by <strong>the</strong> research consortium and two years <strong>of</strong> investment by NAVL into adhesins<br />

expressed by EHEC O157:H7. The current identified antigens are <strong>the</strong> Loc8 fimbrial<br />

adhesin, <strong>the</strong> H7 flagellin and EspA type III translocation filaments. These will be tested<br />

alone and in combination.<br />

The research will exploit well developed in vivo and in vitro systems to investigate <strong>the</strong><br />

interaction <strong>of</strong> EHEC O157:H7 with <strong>the</strong> bovine host including a colonisation protocol for<br />

calves developed by <strong>the</strong> grouping that has led to <strong>the</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> terminal rectum<br />

as <strong>the</strong> principal site <strong>of</strong> colonisation <strong>of</strong> cattle by EHEC O157:H7. This protocol is being<br />

applied to test direct antimicrobial interventions by our grouping. The research combines<br />

<strong>the</strong> expertise <strong>of</strong> scientists in immunology, FAE biology, animal infectious diseases,<br />

vaccine development and molecular biology with excellent microbiology laboratories and<br />

large animal containment facilities.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> summary<br />

Non-food<strong>borne</strong> infections are estimated to make up more than 50% <strong>of</strong> EHEC cases. It is<br />

important to work toward <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> a vaccine for cattle to reduce <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong><br />

agricultural sources on this source <strong>of</strong> human disease.<br />

The main aim <strong>of</strong> project LK0666 is to develop an effective, inexpensive vaccine to limit<br />

EHEC colonisation <strong>of</strong> cattle, <strong>the</strong>reby reducing risk to public health from this pathogen.<br />

This is a difficult subject but is being tackled well by <strong>the</strong> research team. The high quality<br />

work continues to increase <strong>the</strong> E. coli O157 evidence base.<br />

95


Project code: OZ0138C<br />

Project title: A longitudinal study <strong>of</strong> faecal excretion <strong>of</strong> VTEC O157<br />

in cattle to determine epidemiological patterns and<br />

risk factors associated with excretion<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/10/1998<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/01/2005<br />

£2,242,139<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: VLA<br />

Sub-contractor(s): Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Enteric Pathogens, Central Public<br />

Health Laboratory, London<br />

Project code: OZ0145<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool<br />

Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics <strong>Research</strong><br />

Unit (VEERU), School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Policy<br />

Development, University <strong>of</strong> Reading<br />

Project title: VTEC O157 on farm control: Effective measures,<br />

perception and risk communication<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/10/05<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/03/08<br />

£210,125<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: VLA<br />

Sub-contractor(s): N/A<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

OZ0138<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project was to map and explore <strong>the</strong> epidemiology <strong>of</strong> VTEC O157 in<br />

cattle, which at <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project was unknown. The aim was to develop<br />

strategies for control <strong>of</strong> VTEC O157 in cattle to ultimately reduce disease in humans. The<br />

project revealed that 38.7% <strong>of</strong> English and Welsh cattle herds were infected with VTEC<br />

O157 and young-stock between 3 and 18 months <strong>of</strong> age were high-risk animals. VTEC<br />

O157 was intermittently excreted by individual animals and <strong>the</strong> group status also<br />

appeared to be interchangeable, which highlighted <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> environmental<br />

reservoirs. An individual animal is more likely to be infected if it is dirty, fed milk, VTEC is<br />

detected in <strong>the</strong> drinking water or if persistent shedding animals are in <strong>the</strong> same group.<br />

The risk for a group increases if it is Campylobacter positive, <strong>the</strong> bedding is wet, fed<br />

straw or <strong>the</strong> group is large, whereas assessing <strong>the</strong> bedding daily, presence <strong>of</strong> springs<br />

and poultry as well as raised awareness about VTEC O157 reduced <strong>the</strong> prevalence in<br />

96


young-stock. The effect <strong>of</strong> control measures, that targeted at various combinations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

above risk factors and potential environmental reservoirs, was assessed in a randomised<br />

controlled trial. A visual effect <strong>of</strong> a package consisting <strong>of</strong> clean and dry near-environment<br />

and animals, avoiding introduction into groups and overall farm-level biosecurity<br />

measures was identified, albeit <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole package was<br />

much higher than <strong>the</strong> economic benefits to society.<br />

OZ0145<br />

OZ0145 provided additional value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> data collected under OZ0138 by identifying and<br />

describing compliance and motivation factors present during <strong>the</strong> trial and adjusting for<br />

<strong>the</strong>se in <strong>the</strong> statistical models, yielding evidence that dry bedding, closed rearing groups,<br />

closed herd policy and no contact with o<strong>the</strong>r cattle reduced VTEC in a group <strong>of</strong> cattle<br />

over a period <strong>of</strong> 4.5 months. These results were disseminated via presentations aimed at<br />

farmers, private veterinarians, articles in trade and scientific journals and presentations at<br />

international conferences. The data was also used to examine excretion patterns, coexistence<br />

and risk factors <strong>of</strong> VTEC, Campylobacter and Coccidia in young cattle for a<br />

period <strong>of</strong> 6-8 months and revealed that Campylobacter increased <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> VTEC<br />

excretion, changing water in troughs reduced both Campylobacter and Coccidia and that<br />

large herds were more likely to harbor all three pathogens. The prevalence over time was<br />

also used to validate a stochastic model <strong>of</strong> transmission <strong>of</strong> VTEC within a beef herd,<br />

which was produced to test potential future interventions. The farmers from <strong>the</strong> trial were<br />

revisited and interviewed about control <strong>of</strong> zoonses present on <strong>the</strong>ir farms, <strong>the</strong>ir concerns<br />

and <strong>the</strong>ir attitudes and constraints in applying control measures and <strong>the</strong>ir opinions <strong>of</strong><br />

responsibility and financing safe cattle products. The main constraints were lack <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge, lack <strong>of</strong> belief in self-efficacy and no financial flexibility within <strong>the</strong> enterprise,<br />

but in general <strong>the</strong> attitudes towards improving food safety were very positive. The project<br />

will proceed to review risk factors and control strategies for several zoonotic agents<br />

important for cattle aged 3-24 months <strong>of</strong> age to work towards a combined zoonotic<br />

control package.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

Project OZ0138 produced valuable data on <strong>the</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> E. coli O157 in cattle in<br />

England and Wales. At <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> commissioning, <strong>the</strong> incidence <strong>of</strong> human VTEC O157<br />

disease had been increasing and this research provided essential data on <strong>the</strong><br />

epidemiology <strong>of</strong> this organism in <strong>the</strong> UK. Results also complemented <strong>the</strong> work carried<br />

out by <strong>the</strong> Scottish Agricultural College, showing colonisation <strong>of</strong> calves occurs ‗postrumen‘<br />

for E. coli O157. Risk factors for cattle herds becoming infected with E. coli O157<br />

were identified; while this indicated that some measures could be taken to reduce <strong>the</strong> risk<br />

<strong>of</strong> cattle excreting E. coli O157, elimination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> organism is not currently possible.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> work contributed to <strong>the</strong> clean livestock at slaughter policy.<br />

Interventions identified in project OZ0138 were trialled in <strong>the</strong> follow-on project, OZ0145,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> motivators for uptake <strong>of</strong> control measures by farmers assessed. The project<br />

showed that changes to young-stock management, including keeping bedding dry and<br />

avoiding introduction <strong>of</strong> new animals to established herds can reduce VTEC O157 on<br />

cattle farms. Integration <strong>of</strong> measures to reduce risk <strong>of</strong> E. coli O157 infection with those to<br />

reduce <strong>the</strong> risk from o<strong>the</strong>r pathogens may be more likely to be taken up by farmers than<br />

a series <strong>of</strong> individual packages. This indicates that a more holistic approach to<br />

communication may be more appropriate than <strong>the</strong> current approach <strong>of</strong> communicating<br />

one aspect <strong>of</strong> food production at a time.<br />

97


Project code: OZ0144<br />

Project title: Constraints to uptake <strong>of</strong> adequate biosecurity on UK<br />

cattle and sheep farms, with special reference to<br />

zoonotic diseases<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/06/2002<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 31/12/2003<br />

Total cost: £113,279<br />

Affiliation: The University <strong>of</strong> Reading<br />

Sub-contractor(s): The Scottish Agricultural College<br />

Inverness<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

The overall objective <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project is to identify and rank <strong>the</strong> main constraints, including<br />

economic constraints, to <strong>the</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> adequate biosecurity measures on UK<br />

cattle and sheep farms. The measures we consider are mainly aimed at <strong>the</strong> control <strong>of</strong><br />

potentially zoonotic diseases, but also include biosecurity for o<strong>the</strong>r animal infections, in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spread to human population and within and between livestock populations<br />

on UK cattle and sheep farms. Our final objective is to make recommendations that<br />

would enhance such implementation.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> aims <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Defra</strong> <strong>Research</strong> and Development Strategy is to guarantee <strong>the</strong><br />

safety <strong>of</strong> human food that originates from livestock. It is envisaged that an improved<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> biosecurity constraints will lead to <strong>the</strong> formulation <strong>of</strong> recommendations<br />

at both farm and policy level, on how to increase <strong>the</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> biosecurity<br />

measures on <strong>the</strong>se farm. These recommendations will, in turn, contribute to <strong>the</strong> aims <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Defra</strong>‘s R&D policy by enhancing food safety.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

At <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> commissioning, this was a novel study aiming to identify <strong>the</strong> constraints to<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> biosecurity on UK cattle and sheep farms. The major barriers and<br />

drivers for implementation <strong>of</strong> biosecurity were determined through interviews with both<br />

farmers and veterinarians.<br />

This project highlighted <strong>the</strong> difficulties in getting across <strong>the</strong> biosecurity message and<br />

supports <strong>the</strong> view that true partnership is required to deliver this message.<br />

The identification <strong>of</strong> costs and benefits <strong>of</strong> controls have been incorporated in o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

projects within <strong>the</strong> overall zoonoses research programme to address some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

knowledge gaps.<br />

98


Project code: OZ0707<br />

Project title: Identification <strong>of</strong> factors mediating intestinal<br />

colonisation <strong>of</strong> cattle by enterohaemorrhagic<br />

Escherichia coli O157:H7.<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/10/1999<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 11/04/2007<br />

£603,124<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Institute for Animal Health, Compton.<br />

Sub-contractor(s): None<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) comprise a group <strong>of</strong> zoonotic diarrhoeal<br />

pathogens <strong>of</strong> worldwide importance. Human infections are frequently caused by direct or<br />

indirect contact with ruminant faeces and may be complicated by haemorrhagic colitis<br />

and life-threatening renal and neurological sequelae. Strategies to reduce <strong>the</strong> prevalence<br />

<strong>of</strong> EHEC in ruminants are predicted to lower <strong>the</strong> incidence <strong>of</strong> human infections; however<br />

<strong>the</strong> molecular mechanisms influencing intestinal colonisation <strong>of</strong> food-producing hosts by<br />

EHEC are ill-defined. <strong>Defra</strong>-funded research conducted under project OZ0707 aimed to<br />

understand this process in greater detail and to exploit <strong>the</strong> knowledge to develop, test<br />

and refine novel methods <strong>of</strong> disease control. The research involved <strong>the</strong> most<br />

comprehensive survey for EHEC virulence factors performed to date and yielded<br />

valuable insights that could not have been obtained in surrogate rodent or cell-based<br />

assays. The project involved targeted and genome-wide mutagenesis <strong>of</strong> E. coli O157:H7<br />

and analysis <strong>of</strong> wild-type and mutant strains in vitro and in bovine oral challenge, ligated<br />

intestinal loop and ex vivo organ culture assays. The information led to <strong>the</strong> testing <strong>of</strong><br />

several subunit vaccines in cattle and has been disseminated via numerous high-impact<br />

publications, review articles and invited lectures.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

This research has contributed to <strong>the</strong> evidence base for VTEC O157 and to <strong>the</strong><br />

development <strong>of</strong> improved methods <strong>of</strong> control. The study provided baseline data on <strong>the</strong><br />

mechanisms <strong>of</strong> colonization in cattle with E. coli O157 and showed that it might be<br />

difficult to develop functional vaccines. The work was carried out to a high scientific<br />

standard and resulted in several publications in high-impact journals.<br />

Major colonization factors <strong>of</strong> E. coli O157 were identified but vaccination studies with<br />

purified antigen indicated, however, that colonization was not inhibited even in <strong>the</strong><br />

presence <strong>of</strong> high-titre antibodies against <strong>the</strong>se adhesion factors. The results indicated<br />

that <strong>the</strong> way forward may be to construct non-pathogenic probiotic strains that might<br />

occupy <strong>the</strong> niche which is currently used by pathogenic E. coli O157.<br />

99


Project code: OZ0708<br />

Project title: A Systems Analysis Methodology to Elucidate and<br />

Evaluate <strong>the</strong> Critical Control Points for E. coli<br />

0157:H7 in Cattle and sheep from farm to abattoir<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/01/2000<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 30/06/2002<br />

£151,494.00<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Silsoe <strong>Research</strong> Institute<br />

Sub-contractor(s): Veterinary Laboratories Agency<br />

Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

An extensive literature review on <strong>the</strong> epidemiology <strong>of</strong> E. coli O157:H7 on farms was<br />

carried out. On <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> this a conceptual model was proposed. This was reviewed by<br />

an expert workshop attended by o<strong>the</strong>r scientists and <strong>Defra</strong> representatives, and some<br />

revisions were made.<br />

The original objective was to develop a network model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> system. This was found to<br />

be inappropriate because <strong>of</strong> several cyclic features, so a simulation approach was used.<br />

This had two aspects: a deterministic simulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> herd or flock and a stochastic<br />

simulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> transmission <strong>of</strong> E. coli O157:H7 within <strong>the</strong> herd/flock.<br />

Limited testing was possible with <strong>the</strong> available survey data. The model was found to<br />

produce estimates <strong>of</strong> animal prevalence (<strong>the</strong> overall proportion <strong>of</strong> animals shedding) that<br />

were consistent with <strong>the</strong> data. However, for cattle it was found to overestimate <strong>the</strong> withinherd<br />

prevalence and underestimate <strong>the</strong> herd prevalence (<strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> herds<br />

containing shedding animals).<br />

Sensitivity analyses found that <strong>the</strong> most sensitive parameters were those related to<br />

transmission from grass and enclosures to animals, contact between animals, and<br />

pathogen survival on grass, in slurry and in barns.<br />

The model was used to investigate <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> reducing prevalence by a range <strong>of</strong><br />

management interventions. Among <strong>the</strong> most important risk factors were: mixing sheep<br />

and cattle, keeping animals in large groups, high stocking density, introducing positive<br />

animals and reducing <strong>the</strong> interval between slurry spreading and grazing.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

This project developed simulation models for interaction between farm animals and a<br />

large number <strong>of</strong> farm management factors, including farm waste management. The<br />

models use data from <strong>the</strong> literature on E. coli epidemiology.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> conclusions are <strong>of</strong> practical importance for a possible reduction <strong>of</strong> E. coli<br />

O157 carriage and transmission. They are in line with what might have been expected<br />

and do contribute to improving methods <strong>of</strong> control and <strong>the</strong> evidence base.<br />

100


Project code: OZ0706<br />

Project title: EHEC O157 pathogenesis: Ovine and o<strong>the</strong>r animal<br />

model studies<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/04/99<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 30/03/04<br />

£374,377<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Veterinary Laboratories Agency,<br />

Sub-contractor(s): Department <strong>of</strong> Pathology and Microbiology<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Bristol Veterinary School<br />

Project code: OZ0713<br />

Project title: The role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> native host gut flora and innate<br />

immune status upon <strong>the</strong> colonisation <strong>of</strong> E. coli<br />

O157 in ruminants<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/10/04<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 30/09/07<br />

£272,863<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Veterinary Laboratories Agency,<br />

Sub-contractor(s): Comparative and Functional Genomics<br />

Moredun <strong>Research</strong> Institute<br />

Project code: OZ0710<br />

Project title: The role <strong>of</strong> goats and pigs in <strong>the</strong> maintenance<br />

and transmission <strong>of</strong> VTEC including EHEC<br />

O157:H7<br />

Start date (dd/mm/yy): 01/10/02<br />

End date (dd/mm/yy): 30/09/05<br />

£399,546<br />

Total cost:<br />

Affiliation: Veterinary Laboratories Agency,<br />

Sub-contractor(s): University <strong>of</strong> Bristol Veterinary School<br />

101


Abstract <strong>of</strong> research<br />

Projects OZ0706, OZ0710 and OZ0713 have run over <strong>the</strong> past ten years with VLA as <strong>the</strong><br />

lead organisation within a highly collaborative network involving numerous partners,<br />

notably Bristol University and <strong>the</strong> Moredun, and more recently with <strong>the</strong> <strong>Defra</strong> Fellowship<br />

at Edinburgh University, <strong>the</strong> IAH and Imperial College. The overall goal was to<br />

understand <strong>the</strong> mechanisms <strong>of</strong> colonisation and persistence <strong>of</strong> Escherichia coli O157:H7<br />

in sheep (<strong>the</strong> second most prevalent affected species) and o<strong>the</strong>r at risk food producing<br />

animals. It is not possible to summarise <strong>the</strong>se three highly successful projects within 250<br />

words as <strong>the</strong> studies generated 40 peer reviewed papers (see section 9) to which <strong>the</strong><br />

reader has access, as all are in <strong>the</strong> public domain.<br />

Various O157 strains have been used in deliberate oral inoculation studies in<br />

conventionally reared ovines, porcines, caprines and poultry. All <strong>the</strong>se animals are<br />

susceptible to persistent colonisation.<br />

In ovines, very young animals (six days old) are susceptible to colonisation by O157 by<br />

intimate attachment as AE lesions were observed in <strong>the</strong> large intestine, although very<br />

rare and very small. In older animals (six weeks and six months old) O157 induced<br />

lesions were exceedingly rare and were only seen in <strong>the</strong> caecum. However, intimin<br />

deficient mutants were cleared more quickly than wild type strains and interestingly a tir<br />

mutant was cleared even more rapidly in <strong>the</strong> same models. These findings confirmed<br />

persistent colonisation is dependent upon intimin and translocation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tir into host<br />

cells.<br />

In caprines, conventionally reared goats aged 6 days are susceptible to colonisation by<br />

O157 by intimate attachment as AE lesions were observed ileum, caecum, colon and<br />

rectum from all animals. Eight-week-old conventionally-reared goats were inoculated<br />

orally in separate experiments with O157:H7 and an intimin deficient derivative.<br />

Significantly fewer initimin deficient bacteria were shed only on days 2 (p=0.003) and 4<br />

(p=0.014) whereas from day 7 to 29 days <strong>the</strong>re were no differences. Tissues taken from<br />

this study group were examined histologically. AE lesions were not observed at any<br />

intestinal site <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> animals except for one animal, which uniquely shed approximately, 1<br />

x 10 7 O157:H7 per gram <strong>of</strong> faeces for <strong>the</strong> preceding three days and which showed a<br />

heavy, diffuse infection with cryptosporidia and abundant, multifocal AE lesions in <strong>the</strong><br />

distal colon, rectum and at <strong>the</strong> terminal rectum and recto-anal junction. These AE lesions<br />

were confirmed by immunohistochemistry to be associated with E. coli O157:H7. We<br />

conclude that co-infection may be predisposing factor for colonization in caprines (and<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore probably o<strong>the</strong>r at risk species). Five-year-old nannies with kids at foot were<br />

dosed orally with O157:H7 at about six days after parturition. Faecal shedding was<br />

variable up to day 11 after dosing (~1 x 10 4 E. coli O157:H7 cfu per gram faeces) but no<br />

kids became positive for E. coli O157:H7 organisms. Thus, sucking kids are refractive to<br />

colonisation by E. coli O157:H7 probably because <strong>the</strong> challenge dose was low and <strong>the</strong><br />

kids had access to milk that is known to be highly protective.<br />

In porcines, we showed intimin was not required for persistence although in neonates AE<br />

lesions were observed readily after oral inoculation. Indeed, intimin deficient mutants<br />

adhered equally well to IPI-21 (porcine) cells and IVOC (all sections <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gut) as <strong>the</strong><br />

wild type. Also, histological analysis <strong>of</strong> pig tissues at post mortem examination revealed<br />

that E. coli O157 specifically stained bacteria were associated with <strong>the</strong> mucosa <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

ascending and spiral colon but no AE lesions were detected.<br />

102


In poultry, until recently considered free <strong>of</strong> O157 infection, hatchlings inoculated orally<br />

with 10 3 cfu were colonised persistently up to and beyond point <strong>of</strong> lay (20+ weeks <strong>of</strong><br />

age). Shedding can be significant (~10 5 cfu g -1 faeces) for this entire period and egg<br />

shells but not egg contents can be contaminated. Eight strains have been tested in <strong>the</strong><br />

poultry model and variable colonisation was shown with 2 strains being cleared by 80<br />

days whilst o<strong>the</strong>r persisted for 213 days. Intimin was not essential for colonization and no<br />

AE lesions were induced in any section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gut.<br />

These data point to <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> intimin/Tir in ovines but colonisation <strong>of</strong> caprines, porcines<br />

and poultry was less dependent upon intimin/Tir as in ovines. Indeed, <strong>the</strong> data indicated<br />

that long term persistence may be dependent on factors o<strong>the</strong>r than intimin and Tir as well<br />

as host factors such as provision <strong>of</strong> colostrum in <strong>the</strong> young (negative effect) or prior<br />

colonization by o<strong>the</strong>r pathogens (positive effect). To study bacterial factors, we focused<br />

upon those genes identified by analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> O157 genome that may contribute to<br />

persistent colonisation <strong>of</strong> ruminants and sheep in particular. Defined targeted mutants<br />

were constructed (e.g. eae, tir, efa/toxB, waaZ, fliC, lpf, nleD, tccP, ‗O‘ island [O-7, O-36<br />

and O-50] etc) made primarily in E. coli O157:H7 strain NCTC12900 that is a nontoxigenic<br />

strain and o<strong>the</strong>r model strains also. Mutants lacking LPS were uniformly<br />

attenutated in all species as might be anticipated. Flagella played a key role in poultry but<br />

no o<strong>the</strong>r animals species tested. Of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r factors tested, small contributions to<br />

colonization and persistence were detected for most. To study host factors, we focused<br />

on <strong>the</strong> general health status and demonstrated that animals pre-inoculated with C.<br />

parvum prior to challenge with O157:H7 developed multifocal attaching and effacing<br />

lesions in <strong>the</strong> caecum, colon, rectum and at <strong>the</strong> recto-anal junction, confirmed by<br />

immunohistochemistry to be associated with O157:H7, and shed very high numbers <strong>of</strong><br />

O157. Also, neonates deprived <strong>of</strong> colostrum (sheep and goats) are highly susceptible to<br />

colonization and very high shedding.<br />

From <strong>the</strong> large animal studies, it was clear that O157 has a tropism for <strong>the</strong> large intestine<br />

but <strong>the</strong>re was no concrete evidence to support <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis that <strong>the</strong> terminal rectum or<br />

recto-anal junction was <strong>the</strong> preferred site <strong>of</strong> colonisation, as suggested for bovines. What<br />

was interesting was <strong>the</strong> observation that animals colonised beyond about 28 days p.i.<br />

(and <strong>the</strong>refore defined as persistent shedders) had O157 organisms throughput <strong>the</strong><br />

entire gastro-intestinal tract ra<strong>the</strong>r than just <strong>the</strong> large bowel. The significance <strong>of</strong> this is<br />

unclear and experiments are in hand now to answer this question.<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r observation from <strong>the</strong> animal studies was <strong>the</strong> frequent occurrence <strong>of</strong> AE lesions<br />

caused <strong>of</strong> non-O157 bacteria, some <strong>of</strong> which were identified as belonging to O26, O45,<br />

O86 and O115 serogroups. In a brief survey <strong>of</strong> E. coli from an abattoir survey, it was<br />

noted that AEEC comprised up to 10% <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> isolates and each was shown to<br />

possess a functional eae (intimin) gene. A selection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se strains has been studied in<br />

detail in <strong>the</strong> various models in this project and <strong>of</strong> 33 strains tested in gut loops, all formed<br />

AE lesions. Whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se AEC interfered with O157 colonisation is<br />

under assessment currently. In one experiment, shedding <strong>of</strong> O157 after oral challenge by<br />

ovines pre-dosed with O26 showed no differences compared with control animals does<br />

with O157 alone. Surprisingly, O157 suppressed shedding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> resident O26<br />

organisms, an interaction that requires analysis.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Summary<br />

These inter-related projects sought to explore <strong>the</strong> potential for non-bovine food-producing<br />

animals to become colonised with E. coli O157. It was acknowledged that <strong>the</strong> results<br />

103


produced were both relevant and important and had contributed significantly to <strong>the</strong><br />

evidence base for VTEC O157. A large number <strong>of</strong> scientific publications had been<br />

generated.<br />

The work on sheep and goats has been <strong>of</strong> value in <strong>the</strong> control <strong>of</strong> transfer <strong>of</strong> infection to<br />

humans from animals on open farms. It has also provided new information on <strong>the</strong><br />

mechanism <strong>of</strong> long term colonisation <strong>of</strong> E. coli O157 and <strong>the</strong> potential role <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

strains as natural antagonists against infection. The results from challenge studies in pigs<br />

and poultry have raised many questions as <strong>the</strong>se indicate that both species are<br />

susceptible to E. coli O157. In practice, poultry meat and pig meat and also contact with<br />

poultry and pigs have not proved to be a risk for human infection, despite <strong>the</strong> large<br />

population <strong>of</strong> free range pigs and poultry in England. This contradiction needs to be<br />

better understood, for example by studying <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> natural intestinal flora on as<br />

potential antagonists for E. coli O157.<br />

104


Annex 3 – External <strong>Review</strong>er List<br />

105


List <strong>of</strong> External <strong>Review</strong>ers.<br />

Mr. Paul Gayford, formerly <strong>of</strong> <strong>Defra</strong><br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. John Threlfall, Health Protection Agency, UK<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Will Waites, University <strong>of</strong> Nottingham, UK<br />

Dr. Paul McMullin, Poultry Health Centre, UK<br />

Mr. David Burch, Octagon Services Ltd, UK<br />

Dr. Helene Wahlström, National Veterinary Institute, Sweden<br />

Dr. Cornelius Pope, Public Health Agency, Canada<br />

Dr. Mike Taylor, Central Science Laboratory, UK<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dirk Pfeiffer, Royal Veterinary College, UK<br />

Dr. Vincent McDonald, Barts and <strong>the</strong> London School <strong>of</strong> Medicine and Dentistry, UK<br />

Dr. Huw Smith, Scottish Parasite Diagnostic Laboratory, UK<br />

Dr. Nick Dorell, London School <strong>of</strong> Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. David McDowell, University <strong>of</strong> Ulster, UK<br />

Dr. Elizabeth Innes, Moredun <strong>Research</strong> Institute, UK<br />

Dr. Stephen On, ESR Christchurch Science Centre, New Zealand<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Cecil McMurray, Sci-Tec Consultancy, UK<br />

Mr. Keith Gooderham, Poultry health and welfare specialist, UK<br />

Dr. Mogens Madsen, Dianova, Denmark<br />

Dr. Barti Synge, Scottish Agriculture College, UK<br />

Dr. Helge Karch, Institut fur Hygiene, Germany<br />

Dr. Lothar Beutin, NRL-E. coli, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, UK<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Mac Johnson, retired from <strong>the</strong> Royal Veterinary College, UK<br />

106


Annex 4 – Assessment Forms<br />

107


<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Defra</strong>’s FBZ <strong>Research</strong> Programme, 26 th – 27 th November 2007<br />

ASSESSMENT FORM - POLICY<br />

PROJECT CODE(S):<br />

POLICY GROUP(S) APPRAISED BY:<br />

DATE:<br />

Instructions: Please assign a score and provide written comments where necessary.<br />

Scores should be based on a 1-5 scale, where:<br />

1 = Not at all 2 = Partial 3 = Satisfactory 4 = Good 5 = Very Good<br />

1. How useful has <strong>the</strong> research been to Policy?<br />

(This may include helping to answer an urgent policy question, informing <strong>the</strong> formulation<br />

<strong>of</strong> a policy, contributing to <strong>the</strong> evidence base, maintaining scientific expertise,<br />

development <strong>of</strong> rapid and accurate diagnostic tests, development <strong>of</strong> improved methods <strong>of</strong><br />

control, o<strong>the</strong>r etc.)<br />

Score<br />

Comments<br />

2. Has <strong>the</strong> research raised fur<strong>the</strong>r questions that need addressing with <strong>Defra</strong><br />

R&D funding?<br />

Yes / No<br />

If yes, please provide details<br />

3. Please state any questions you wish to be forwarded to <strong>the</strong> contractor for<br />

comment -<br />

108


109


<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Defra</strong>’s FBZ <strong>Research</strong> Programme, 26 th – 27 th November 2007<br />

ASSESSMENT FORM – EXTERNAL REFEREES<br />

PROJECT CODE(S):<br />

APPRAISED BY:<br />

DATE:<br />

The scores and comments you provide will be used for a range <strong>of</strong> purposes, including (1) to inform <strong>Defra</strong><br />

personnel (2) for feed back to <strong>the</strong> project leader(s) and (3) for possible inclusion in <strong>the</strong> review output<br />

document (which will be published on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Defra</strong> website). Please note that while a list <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> review panel<br />

members will be publicly available, with reference to points 2 and 3, <strong>the</strong> scores and comments provided by<br />

each referee will not be directly attributed to <strong>the</strong>m, but ra<strong>the</strong>r referee 1, referee 2 etc. However, you should<br />

be aware that Departmental correspondence, including peer review processes, fall within <strong>the</strong> remit <strong>of</strong><br />

regulations that permit greater access to information, including Freedom <strong>of</strong> Information, Environmental<br />

Information Regulations and <strong>the</strong> code <strong>of</strong> practise on access to government information. In <strong>the</strong> event that<br />

peer review information (such as <strong>the</strong> names <strong>of</strong> peer reviewers and <strong>the</strong> comments <strong>the</strong>y made) should<br />

become <strong>the</strong> subject <strong>of</strong> such a request, <strong>the</strong> Department will seek to protect <strong>the</strong> interests <strong>of</strong> peer reviewers in<br />

<strong>the</strong> light <strong>of</strong> legal requirements.<br />

Instructions: Please assign a score and provide written comments where necessary.<br />

Scores should be based on a 1-5 scale, where:<br />

1 = Not at all 2 = Partial 3 = Satisfactory 4 = Good 5 = Very Good<br />

1. Relevance and appropriateness for R&D funding by <strong>Defra</strong><br />

2. Soundness and appropriateness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scientific approaches<br />

and methods<br />

3. Appropriateness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> contractors, sub-contractors and<br />

collaborators (e.g. personnel and facilities)<br />

4. Rate <strong>of</strong> progress to date in achieving <strong>the</strong> aims and objectives<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> research<br />

5. Probability <strong>of</strong> success (if <strong>the</strong> research is ongoing)<br />

6. Conclusions based on sound evidence<br />

7. Dissemination <strong>of</strong> findings<br />

8. Quality <strong>of</strong> science<br />

9. Value for money<br />

10. Overall rating (it is important to provide a score here)<br />

110


11. Overall opinions on <strong>the</strong> research area (including your overall views, as well as any<br />

comments you have on questions 1-10)*<br />

12. Has <strong>the</strong> research raised fur<strong>the</strong>r questions that need addressing with <strong>Defra</strong> R&D<br />

funding?<br />

YES/NO<br />

If yes, please provide details*<br />

13. Are <strong>the</strong> areas within <strong>the</strong> current research addressing topics <strong>of</strong> highest priority?<br />

YES/NO<br />

If not, which topics would you identify as high?*<br />

14. Please state any questions you wish to be forwarded to <strong>the</strong> contractor for<br />

comment –<br />

*Please expand boxes as required<br />

111


Annex 5 – <strong>Review</strong> Timetable<br />

112


Salmonella, Cryptosporidium species, Yersinia enterocolitica and<br />

Bovine neosporosis<br />

Monday 26 th November 2007<br />

Venue: <strong>Defra</strong>, Room LG04/05/06, 1a Page Street, Westminster, London SW1P 4PQ<br />

09:00 – 09:10 Registration and c<strong>of</strong>fee<br />

9.10 – 9.30 Introductions<br />

Molecular Methods<br />

Salmonella<br />

09.30 – 09.45 Project OZ0312: Development <strong>of</strong> a sensitive and<br />

specific molecular typing method for <strong>the</strong> epidemiological<br />

study <strong>of</strong> Salmonella.<br />

09.45 – 10:00 Project OZ0324: New and emerging Salmonella<br />

serovars; epidemiological, risk-based and molecular<br />

approaches to <strong>the</strong>ir identification and control.<br />

10.00 – 10.15 Project OZ0311: Conventional versus capillary<br />

electrophoresis <strong>of</strong> RFLP fragments and PCR products<br />

for sensitive and rapid subtyping <strong>of</strong> Salmonella.<br />

Poultry – Broilers<br />

10.15 -10.35 Project OZ0314: Role <strong>of</strong> defined bacterial genes and<br />

host genetic background in intestinal colonisation <strong>of</strong><br />

poultry by Salmonella.<br />

Follow-up Project OZ0320: Bacterial and host genes in<br />

Salmonella colonisation in poultry.<br />

10.35 – 10.50 Project OZ0328: A monitoring, control and education<br />

package to assist <strong>the</strong> turkey industry with reduction <strong>of</strong><br />

Salmonella and antimicrobial resistance and achieving<br />

targets.<br />

10.50 – 11.10 C<strong>of</strong>fee break<br />

Poultry – Layers<br />

11.10 – 11.25<br />

11.25 – 11.45<br />

Project OZ0327: Effect <strong>of</strong> immunosuppression<br />

associated with point-<strong>of</strong>-lay on Salmonella infection and<br />

immunity in laying hens.<br />

Project OZ0317: Epidemiological investigations <strong>of</strong><br />

Salmonella contamination in table egg production.<br />

Follow-up Project OZ0321: Investigation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong><br />

environmental contamination in <strong>the</strong> epidemiology <strong>of</strong><br />

Salmonella infection in egg-laying flock.<br />

113


11.45 – 12.00<br />

Bovine and Porcine<br />

Follow-up Project OZ0325: A monitoring, control and<br />

education package to assist <strong>the</strong> egg industry with<br />

Salmonella reduction and achieving EU targets.<br />

Project OZ0326: Managing <strong>the</strong> challenges to <strong>the</strong> egg<br />

industry posed by new SE PTs.<br />

12.00 – 12.15 Project OZ0313: Non-specific and innate resistance to<br />

Salmonella infection in chicken and pigs.<br />

12.15 – 12.30 Project OZ0135: Epidemiological studies <strong>of</strong> multiple<br />

resistant S. typhimurium DT 104 infection in cattle.<br />

12.30 – 12.45 Project OZ0315: Salmonella pathogenesis and<br />

immunity in cattle and pigs.<br />

12.45 – 13.05 Project OZ0316: Epidemiological studies <strong>of</strong> Salmonella<br />

in pigs and control by intervention.<br />

Follow-up Project OZ0323: An integrated risk based<br />

approach to <strong>the</strong> control <strong>of</strong> Salmonella in UK pig farms.<br />

13.05 – 13.20 Project OZ0318: Understanding <strong>the</strong> dynamics <strong>of</strong><br />

endemic and epidemic Salmonella infections in cattle<br />

and pigs.<br />

13.20 – 13.35 Project OZ0319: Salmonella pathogenesis in cattle and<br />

pigs.<br />

13.35 – 14.30 Lunch<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

14.30 – 14.50<br />

14.50 – 15.05<br />

15.05 – 15.20<br />

15.20 End <strong>of</strong> meeting<br />

Project OZ0402: What is <strong>the</strong> potential for human<br />

isolates <strong>of</strong> C. parvum to infect, colonise and be excreted<br />

by farm animals.<br />

Follow-up Project OZ0407: Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Zoonotic<br />

Transmission <strong>of</strong> Cryptosporidium Spp. and C. Parvum<br />

genotypes between humans and animals.<br />

Project OZ0405: The genotypic and phenotypic<br />

comparison <strong>of</strong> virulent Yersinia enterocolitica from<br />

humans and animals.<br />

Project OZ0404: Bovine neosporosis: <strong>the</strong> development<br />

<strong>of</strong> evidence-based control systems.<br />

114


Campylobacter and E. coli<br />

Tuesday 27 th November 2007<br />

Venue: <strong>Defra</strong>, Room LG04/05/06, 1a Page Street, Westminster, London SW1P 4PQ<br />

09.00 – 09.10 Registration and c<strong>of</strong>fee<br />

09.10 – 09.30 Introductions<br />

Campylobacter<br />

Molecular Methods<br />

09.30 – 09.50 Project OZ0604: Characterisation <strong>of</strong> strain variation in<br />

Campylobacter jejuni.<br />

Follow-up Project OZ0611: Development <strong>of</strong> a<br />

comprehensive MLST database for assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

Campylobacter risk factors.<br />

09.50 – 10.05 Project OZ0605: Genotypic and phenotypic instability <strong>of</strong><br />

Campylobacters from animal and human sources.<br />

10.05 – 10.20 Project OZ0607: An investigation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distinguishing<br />

features <strong>of</strong> C. jejuni strains that have host/disease<br />

implications.<br />

Poultry broilers<br />

10.20 – 10.40 Project OZ0606: Protective immunity and competitive<br />

exclusion in development <strong>of</strong> effective intervention<br />

products for poultry.<br />

Follow-up Project OZ0614: To develop vaccination<br />

approaches to <strong>the</strong> control <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter in poultry.<br />

10.40 – 11.00 Project OZ0608: Epidemiological studies and<br />

development <strong>of</strong> practical control measures for<br />

Campylobacter in broiler flocks.<br />

Follow-up Project OZ0610: Survival and persistence <strong>of</strong><br />

Campylobacters in poultry farm environments and<br />

identification <strong>of</strong> control measures.<br />

Follow-up Project OZ0613: Towards risk-based control<br />

<strong>of</strong> Campylobacter: developing <strong>the</strong> evidence base using<br />

epidemiological and bacteriological approaches.<br />

11.00 – 11.15 Project OZ0609: Determining <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> maternal<br />

antibodies in <strong>the</strong> lag phase <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter jejuni<br />

infection in chickens.<br />

11.15 – 11.30 Project LK0665: Improving gut health and nutrient<br />

capture <strong>of</strong> broiler chickens through selection for innate<br />

immune function.<br />

11.30 – 11.50 C<strong>of</strong>fee break<br />

115


Campylobacter O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

11.50 – 12.05 Project OZ0612: The epidemiology <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter<br />

infection in dogs in context <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> infection to<br />

humans.<br />

E. coli<br />

12.05 – 12.20 Project OZ0703: Plant antibody delivery <strong>of</strong> passive<br />

immunisation against E. coli 0157:H7: a novel means <strong>of</strong><br />

control in <strong>the</strong> animal.<br />

12.20 – 12.35 Project OZ0704: Quantification <strong>of</strong> E. coli 0157:H7<br />

virulence factors in vivo using real-time RT-PCR and in<br />

situ RT-PCR.<br />

12.35– 12.50 Project OZ0705: A proteomic approach to identify<br />

virulence determinants <strong>of</strong> EHEC 0157.<br />

13.05– 13.20 Project OZ0709: Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> VTEC 0157 and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

VTECs likely to be pathogenic to man in farm wastes.<br />

13.20– 13.35 Project OZ0711: Incidence and control <strong>of</strong> VTEC in<br />

animal feeds.<br />

13.35– 14.30 Lunch<br />

14.30 – 14.45 Project OZ0712: Escherichia coli O157 interventions<br />

and control.<br />

14.45 – 15.00 Project LK0666: Vaccination strategies for control <strong>of</strong><br />

enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in cattle.<br />

15.00 – 15.20 Project OZ0138C: A longitudinal study <strong>of</strong> faecal<br />

excretion <strong>of</strong> VTEC 0157 in cattle to determine<br />

epidemiological patterns and risk factors.<br />

Follow-up Project OZ0145: VTEC O157 on farm control:<br />

effective measures, perception and risk communication.<br />

15.20 – 15:35 Project OZ0144: Constraints to uptake <strong>of</strong> adequate<br />

biosecurity on UK cattle and sheep farms, with special<br />

reference to zoonotic diseases.<br />

15.35 – 15.50 Project OZ0707: Identification <strong>of</strong> factors mediating<br />

colonisation <strong>of</strong> cattle by enterohaemorrhagic<br />

Escherichia coli<br />

15.50 – 16.05 Project OZ0708: A systems analysis methodology to<br />

elucidate and evaluate <strong>the</strong> critical control points for E.<br />

coli 0157:H7 in cattle and sheep from farm to abattoir.<br />

16.05 - 16.25 Project OZ0706: EHEC 0157 Pathogenesis; ovine and<br />

animal model studies.<br />

Follow-up Project OZ0710: The role <strong>of</strong> goats and pigs in<br />

<strong>the</strong> maintenance and transmission <strong>of</strong> VTEC including<br />

EHEC 0157:H7.<br />

Follow-up Project OZ0713: The role <strong>of</strong> native host gut<br />

flora and innate immune status upon <strong>the</strong> colonisation <strong>of</strong><br />

E. coli O157 in ruminants.<br />

16.25 End <strong>of</strong> meeting<br />

116

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!