12.10.2012 Views

Technical analysis of stock trends - 8th edition

Technical analysis of stock trends - 8th edition

Technical analysis of stock trends - 8th edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

chapter thirty-four<br />

A Quick Summation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Tactical Methods<br />

There are three types <strong>of</strong> tactical operations: (1) Getting into new commitments;<br />

(2) getting out <strong>of</strong> commitments which have moved as expected and<br />

show a pr<strong>of</strong>it; and (3) getting out <strong>of</strong> commitments which have not moved<br />

as expected, whether the transaction shows a pr<strong>of</strong>it or a loss.<br />

The principles <strong>of</strong> taking pr<strong>of</strong>its based on <strong>trends</strong>, Resistance and Support<br />

Levels, measuring implications <strong>of</strong> patterns, and most especially, on the daily<br />

technical and volume action <strong>of</strong> the <strong>stock</strong>, already have been covered. These<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>it-taking operations seldom present very difficult problems, since the<br />

picture has developed normally and in the way you hoped and expected it<br />

would. The “stepping <strong>of</strong>f” point is usually easy to determine.<br />

The more difficult problems arise in making new commitments correctly,<br />

and in the very important defensive operations <strong>of</strong> getting out <strong>of</strong> losing<br />

commitments with the least possible loss.<br />

It should be emphasized that a <strong>stock</strong> which has ceased to act in a Bullish<br />

manner and which should, therefore, be sold is not necessarily a short sale on<br />

the next rally. In other words, the signal that shows weakness or failure <strong>of</strong> a<br />

move in one trend is not always a signal to make new commitments on the<br />

opposite side <strong>of</strong> the market. More <strong>of</strong>ten than not, in fact, it is nothing <strong>of</strong> the kind.<br />

We know that certain moves, such as adverse breakouts from Symmetrical<br />

Triangles or Rectangles, advise us simultaneously to get out <strong>of</strong> commitments<br />

in what is now clearly the “wrong” direction and to make new commitments<br />

in the “right” direction. The simple failure <strong>of</strong> a trendline, however,<br />

where the <strong>stock</strong> merely penetrates an old Minor Bottom without completing<br />

a Head-and-Shoulders or other Reversal Pattern, although reason enough to<br />

get out <strong>of</strong> commitments which are showing losses, is not sufficiently conclusive,<br />

by itself, to justify reversing policy and making new commitments<br />

in the opposite direction. Therefore we separate the two types <strong>of</strong> signals as<br />

follows:<br />

Get out <strong>of</strong> present commitments<br />

• On adverse breakout from Head-and-Shoulders Formation.<br />

• On adverse breakout from Symmetrical Triangle.<br />

471

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!