04.07.2013 Views

Layered Process Audits (LPA) - Chrysler

Layered Process Audits (LPA) - Chrysler

Layered Process Audits (LPA) - Chrysler

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit (<strong>LPA</strong>)<br />

1


Why am I here<br />

today?<br />

2


• Knowledge<br />

Objectives<br />

Be able to explain the rationale behind <strong>LPA</strong>s<br />

Be able to describe how to conduct <strong>LPA</strong>s<br />

Be able to describe the benefits of <strong>LPA</strong>s<br />

• Skills<br />

Be able to to integrate <strong>LPA</strong>s into your plant’s quality system<br />

Be able to develop <strong>LPA</strong> check sheet<br />

Be able to conduct and <strong>LPA</strong> on the factory floor<br />

3


1. Pre- Survey<br />

AGENDA<br />

2. <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit Plan<br />

3. Developing <strong>LPA</strong> Check Sheet<br />

4. <strong>LPA</strong> Implementation<br />

5. Monitor & Adjust Plan<br />

6. Summary<br />

7. Post - Survey<br />

4


1. <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> <strong>Audits</strong> are:<br />

a. A system of audits performed by corporate quality to verify process<br />

conformance<br />

b. A system of audits performed by a 3rd party organization to verify process<br />

conformance.<br />

c. A system of audits performed by multiple levels of management to verify<br />

process conformance.<br />

d. A system of audits performed by operators and line supervisors to verify<br />

process conformance.<br />

2. The two type of <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> <strong>Audits</strong> are:<br />

a. <strong>Process</strong> Control <strong>Audits</strong> and Preventive Maintenance <strong>Audits</strong><br />

b. <strong>Process</strong> Monitoring <strong>Audits</strong> and Error & Mistake Proofing Verification <strong>Audits</strong><br />

c. <strong>Process</strong> Control <strong>Audits</strong> and Error & Mistake Proofing Verification <strong>Audits</strong><br />

3. Who can perform <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> <strong>Audits</strong> (<strong>LPA</strong>)?<br />

a. Auditors trained in <strong>LPA</strong> and TS-16949<br />

b. Certified quality auditors<br />

c. Anyone trained in <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> <strong>Audits</strong><br />

<strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> <strong>Audits</strong><br />

PRE/POST TEST<br />

5


4. Who owns the <strong>LPA</strong> process?<br />

a. Manufacturing<br />

b. Quality<br />

c. All of the above<br />

5. The responsibility of the Plant Manager is to:<br />

a. Verify all <strong>LPA</strong> audits are being performed according to schedule<br />

b. Conduct <strong>Process</strong> Control <strong>Audits</strong> on a weekly basis.<br />

c. Review all non-conformances and verify they have permanent corrective action.<br />

d. a and c;<br />

6. Some benefits of <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> <strong>Audits</strong> are.<br />

a. Reduction of build variation and defects<br />

b. Improvement of First Time through capability<br />

c. Facilitation of operator training and improvement of morale<br />

d. a and b;<br />

e. all of the above<br />

<strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit<br />

PRE/POST TEST<br />

6


7. Which of the following is not a part of developing the <strong>LPA</strong> plan?<br />

a. Form a <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit team<br />

b. Obtain <strong>Chrysler</strong> SQA approval of plan<br />

c. Develop audit checklist<br />

d. Determine audit frequency<br />

8. The <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit is _________ focused?<br />

a. Part<br />

b. <strong>Process</strong><br />

c. Part and process<br />

9. During the <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit the auditor should randomly select process<br />

and/or product characteristics to be measured to ensure they are within<br />

specification?<br />

a. True<br />

b. False<br />

<strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit<br />

PRE/POST TEST<br />

7


We’re<br />

Looking for<br />

PERFECT<br />

PARTS<br />

Throughout<br />

the Supply<br />

“Cost of failure after launch is 20 times<br />

more expensive than prevention costs<br />

during launch”<br />

Chain<br />

8


DFMEA<br />

<strong>LPA</strong><br />

PRODUCTION<br />

DEMONSTRATION RUN<br />

PFMEA<br />

CONTROL PLAN<br />

Toolbox<br />

TOOLING, EQUIPMENT, GAGES ENGINEERING STANDARDS<br />

AQP TIMING CHART<br />

SE<br />

TS16949 FOREVER<br />

APPEARANCE<br />

REQUIREMENTS<br />

PV<br />

PSO APPROVAL<br />

AQP/PSO<br />

PREVENTATIVE<br />

MAINTENANCE<br />

FPSC<br />

PPAP<br />

KEY CHARACTERISTICS<br />

KEY PERSONNEL WORK INSTRUCTIONS<br />

AND KEY PERSONNEL TRAINING<br />

EMP(ERROR/MISTAKE PROOFING)<br />

PROCESS CAPABILITY<br />

BOUNDARY SAMPLES<br />

INCOMING AND<br />

OUTGOING MATERIAL<br />

SUPPLIER WARRANTY PARTS PLAN<br />

NCT<br />

GATE REQUIREMENTS AQP<br />

LESSONS LEARNED<br />

9


Cost of Non-Conformances Non Conformances at Various<br />

Points<br />

Defect found at:<br />

The Next End of User’s User<br />

Final End<br />

Source <strong>Process</strong> Line Inspection Hand<br />

*Very minor *Scrap *Repair *Significant Rework Rework<br />

*3rd Party Containment<br />

*Minor Delay *Containment *Additional Operations Operations<br />

*Premium<br />

Freight<br />

*Rework *Overtime<br />

*Administrative costs<br />

*Reschedule *Reschedule<br />

*Delay in delivery<br />

*Warranty Early Costs<br />

Detection / Prevention<br />

10<br />

of Work Work<br />

*Added inspection<br />

*Reputation


Supplier Interface – <strong>LPA</strong> is <strong>Chrysler</strong><br />

Mandatory Requirement<br />

ISO/ TS 16949<br />

<strong>Chrysler</strong> Customer Specific Requirements<br />

New section under Internal <strong>Audits</strong><br />

Effective 7/01/04 for Powertrain & Component Plants suppliers;<br />

1/1/05 for all remaining suppliers<br />

Posted on AIAG, IAOB, and QMS web sites<br />

Letter mailed to all suppliers<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> is a new Quality Tool.<br />

11


1. <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit Plan<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> Definitions and<br />

Requirements<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> Benefits<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> Plan<br />

12


<strong>LPA</strong> Definitions and Requirements<br />

What Are <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> <strong>Audits</strong>?<br />

<strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> <strong>Audits</strong> (<strong>LPA</strong>) are a system of audits performed<br />

by multiple levels of management. Key process characteristics are<br />

audited frequently to verify process conformance.<br />

The purpose of <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> <strong>Audits</strong> is to ensure continuous<br />

conformance, thereby improving process stability and first-time<br />

through capability. (As required by <strong>Chrysler</strong> Group TS Customer<br />

Specifics (4.2.1.9.1)<br />

13


<strong>LPA</strong> Definitions and Requirements<br />

What is a <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit?<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> is an ongoing system of process checks that verify<br />

proper methods, settings, operator craftsmanship, error<br />

proofing devices and other inputs are in place to ensure<br />

a defect free product.<br />

<strong>LPA</strong>’s assure that defined methods and work<br />

instructions are utilized, problem solving solutions are<br />

held in place, and all process issues are identified and<br />

quickly corrected.<br />

14


<strong>LPA</strong> Definitions and Requirements<br />

There are Two Types of <strong>Layered</strong><br />

<strong>Process</strong> <strong>Audits</strong>:<br />

<strong>Process</strong> Control <strong>Audits</strong> should be conduct on any<br />

process with customer complaint issues, high risk<br />

elements [PFMEA] and key characteristics that affect<br />

part quality. <strong>Process</strong> Control <strong>Audits</strong> shall be performed<br />

once per shift by supervisors. Plant management shall<br />

perform the audit once per week.<br />

Error & Mistake Proofing Verification audits shall<br />

be conducted on all error/mistake proofing techniques.<br />

They shall be conducted once per shift at the start of<br />

each shift. Only qualified employees shall perform Error<br />

& Mistake Proof Verification <strong>Audits</strong>. Set-up, Set up,<br />

maintenance or quality auditors are usually qualified.<br />

15


<strong>LPA</strong> Definitions and Requirements<br />

How does an <strong>LPA</strong> Work?<br />

LAYERED PROCESS<br />

AUDITS ARE PROCESS<br />

BASED, NOT PART<br />

BASED.<br />

<strong>Process</strong> <strong>Audits</strong><br />

PROCESS Error<br />

Proofing<br />

Continuous<br />

Improvement<br />

Inputs<br />

Corrective<br />

Actions<br />

Prevention<br />

Actions<br />

Employee<br />

Workshops<br />

•<strong>Audits</strong> are conducted regularly by all levels of supervision<br />

•Non-conformances are immediately addressed<br />

16


<strong>LPA</strong> Definitions and Requirements<br />

Who Performs <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> <strong>Audits</strong>?<br />

Anybody can perform a <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit.<br />

Manufacturing management must own the process and perform audits.<br />

All managers, regardless of function, can be auditors. 。<br />

Each management level should perform audits.<br />

17


<strong>LPA</strong> Benefits<br />

• Improved process stability & reduce variation<br />

• Prevents process errors and operator mistakes<br />

• Improves and maintains discipline<br />

• Initiates Continuous Improvement actions<br />

• Lower Rework & Repair<br />

• Reduces scrap and eliminates waste<br />

• Improves communication<br />

• Instills and improves standardization<br />

• Improves overall Quality and reduces costs<br />

• FTC in high 90%<br />

• Initiates continuous improvement actions<br />

• Early detection & prevention<br />

18


<strong>LPA</strong> Benefits<br />

Reduces<br />

Improves<br />

Facilitates<br />

Reinforces<br />

•Build variation based on work standardization<br />

•End-of-line inspection<br />

•Part defects<br />

•First time through capability<br />

•Morale<br />

•Operator training<br />

•Management/operator interface<br />

•Safety regulations<br />

19


The <strong>Chrysler</strong> Kokomo Transmission Plant<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> Success Story<br />

<strong>LPA</strong><br />

has achieved significant gains in FTC using <strong>LPA</strong>.<br />

FTC in the high 90%<br />

Rework now minimal<br />

Improvements correlate with <strong>LPA</strong> deployment<br />

Number of <strong>LPA</strong><br />

Checks Per Week<br />

Repair Inventory vs FTC vs <strong>LPA</strong><br />

Repair Inventory FTC<br />

540<br />

0 <strong>LPA</strong><br />

180<br />

180<br />

18-02<br />

21-02<br />

24-02<br />

27-02<br />

30-02<br />

33-02<br />

36-02<br />

39-02<br />

42-02<br />

45-02<br />

48-02<br />

51-02<br />

1-03<br />

4-03<br />

7-03<br />

10-03<br />

13-03<br />

16-03<br />

19-03<br />

22-03<br />

25-03<br />

28-03<br />

31-03<br />

34-03<br />

37-03<br />

40-03<br />

43-03<br />

46-03<br />

49-03<br />

52-03<br />

Weekly<br />

It worked for us,<br />

it can work for you<br />

and<br />

your Suppliers!<br />

KTP Now conducting 6700<br />

<strong>Process</strong> <strong>Layered</strong> Audit<br />

100<br />

95<br />

90<br />

85<br />

80<br />

75<br />

70<br />

65<br />

60<br />

55<br />

%FTC<br />

20


<strong>LPA</strong> Benefits<br />

Proven Successful Internally<br />

Expanding Collaboration to our Supply base<br />

Not asking Suppliers to do something we are not<br />

Low investment – significant quality return<br />

21


<strong>LPA</strong> Plan<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> Plan Elements<br />

1. Form <strong>LPA</strong> Team<br />

2. Design Audit Check Sheet<br />

3. Develop <strong>LPA</strong> Implementation Procedures<br />

4. Develop Monitoring <strong>Process</strong><br />

5. Reporting Results to <strong>Chrysler</strong><br />

6. Execute Plan<br />

22


Form <strong>LPA</strong> Team<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> Plan<br />

Form a Team: Select team members that are multi-functional multi functional and<br />

multi-level: multi level: Managers, Supervisors, Inspectors, and Operators<br />

from all areas such as Manufacturing, Quality Engineering, and<br />

Maintenance.<br />

Upper Management: Need to be included as team members.<br />

<strong>Process</strong> Owner: Should be someone within plant management.<br />

Team Leader: Should be the person responsible for overseeing<br />

implementation.<br />

Empower the Team: The team must be able to make necessary<br />

decisions related to <strong>LPA</strong>.<br />

Support: All management must be notified to provide immediate<br />

support when requested.<br />

Schedule frequent meetings: Meetings should be scheduled to<br />

review<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> results, track corrective actions and make adjustments.<br />

adjustments.<br />

Action Plan: Develop an action plan to identify all<br />

implementation steps.<br />

Periodic Reviews of Action Plan: Management team should<br />

schedule<br />

23


<strong>LPA</strong> Plan<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> Leadership Role<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> calls for substantial commitment of management’s time and effort.<br />

Leadership’s role is to:<br />

Fix system problems<br />

Instill discipline<br />

Show appreciation to operators for doing work correctly<br />

Encourage improvement ideas from the workforce<br />

All plant staff should conduct <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> <strong>Audits</strong> throughout the plant<br />

During early phase - Management audits will find problems, but later the<br />

management audits will find improvements.<br />

24


<strong>LPA</strong> Plan<br />

Supplier’s Supplier s review & Approval<br />

Supplier shall conduct internal review of <strong>LPA</strong> Plan<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> plan to include <strong>LPA</strong> implementation timing<br />

Supplier shall finalize <strong>LPA</strong> plan<br />

Shall be signed – off by <strong>LPA</strong> team & Plant Manager prior to<br />

approval<br />

from your customer<br />

For Medium and High risk parts, both the <strong>LPA</strong> plan and<br />

demonstration shall be approved by the Supplier Quality<br />

Specialist.<br />

25


Example:<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> Plan<br />

26


Example:<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> Plan<br />

27


Customer Complaints, Quality Alerts<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

First-Time Through data, Scrap Reports<br />

Key Characteristics and <strong>Process</strong> Capability: Cpk & Gage R&R<br />

PFMEA, <strong>Process</strong> Flow Diagram, Control Plan<br />

Set-up Sheets, Work Instructions, Inspection Instructions<br />

Error and Mistake Proofing<br />

Quality System <strong>Audits</strong>, Dock <strong>Audits</strong>, Inspection Reports<br />

Rework instructions<br />

2. . Developing <strong>LPA</strong><br />

Check Sheet<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> Check Sheet Input<br />

28


2. . Developing <strong>LPA</strong><br />

Check Sheet<br />

The Area of Highest Risk should be the first area to implement the<br />

<strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit<br />

This area will also be used as a Lessons Learned for implementing the<br />

<strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit across the entire manufacturing facility.<br />

Use Discretion when adding items to the checklist<br />

Audit items are issues that would cause Customer Dissatisfaction.<br />

29


2. . Developing <strong>LPA</strong> Check Sheet<br />

Typical Audit Elements For…<br />

Assembly / Fabrication<br />

(Manually Dependent <strong>Process</strong>es)<br />

Craftsmanship<br />

Operation movement<br />

Proper product identification<br />

Presence & content of<br />

instructions<br />

Presence & content of visual<br />

aids<br />

Sustainment of 5S<br />

workplace<br />

Touchpoint inspections<br />

Checking of customer used<br />

features<br />

Use of manual assists<br />

Packing and stacking<br />

techniques<br />

Placement of labels<br />

Calibration of gages<br />

Inspection plan being<br />

followed<br />

Torque monitoring<br />

Completion of<br />

documentation<br />

Error & mistake proofing<br />

nonconformance testing<br />

30


2. . Developing <strong>LPA</strong> Check Sheet<br />

Typical Audit Elements For…<br />

Machining/Robotics<br />

(Automation Driven <strong>Process</strong>es)<br />

Preventative<br />

Maintenance<br />

Calibration of gages<br />

Technical parameters<br />

Set-up Set up procedures<br />

Machine settings<br />

<strong>Process</strong> sheets<br />

Tool change<br />

verification<br />

Positioning of coolant<br />

lines<br />

Die coloration<br />

Gage plan<br />

Sample part retention<br />

Documentation of gage<br />

checks<br />

SPC data capture and<br />

charting<br />

Mastering of gages<br />

Error & mistake proofing<br />

nonconformance testing<br />

31


2. . Developing <strong>LPA</strong> Check Sheet<br />

Audit Question Criteria …<br />

Each audit question should ask HOW?<br />

WHAT? And WHY?<br />

Questions: Objective, Specific & Concise<br />

Explanation: Reason for Check<br />

Reaction Plan: What to do if non-conformance<br />

non conformance<br />

Countermeasure: Measurement to protect<br />

customer<br />

32


2. . Developing <strong>LPA</strong> Check Sheet<br />

How to Develop Questions… Questions<br />

Objective:<br />

After looking at evidence vs stated criteria, can be easily<br />

answered<br />

with a “Yes” or a “No”.<br />

Specific:<br />

Avoid unclear terms like properly or correctly<br />

Concise:<br />

Critical to quality<br />

Conducted by people unfamiliar with area<br />

33


Making Questions Specific (Example #1)<br />

Initial Question :<br />

Inspection Log Book: Look and see if the log<br />

is being filled out properly and checks are<br />

What? being made.. What?<br />

How ?<br />

made.<br />

Improved Question :<br />

Inspection Log Book: Verify QAFM250092 is being<br />

filled out with date, shift, badge and checks are<br />

being made. (Missing or Incorrect data could<br />

result in incorrect units being held in the event of<br />

a containment.)<br />

Why?<br />

34


Making Questions Specific (Example #1)<br />

Initial Question :<br />

Pressure Dial Settings: Look and see if the<br />

pressure dial is being properly set.<br />

What How<br />

Improved Question :<br />

Hydraulics Pressure Dial Settings (Right): Verify<br />

Pressure dial is set to 450 psi prior to start-up. start up. If<br />

not set to 450 psi contact maintenance prior to<br />

operation. (Verification of Hydraulics pressure dial<br />

settings ensures machine operates within the<br />

correct press force range.)<br />

Why<br />

35


2. . Developing <strong>LPA</strong> Check Sheet<br />

OPERATIO<br />

N<br />

or<br />

PROCESS<br />

RECEIVING<br />

INSPECTION<br />

INJECTION<br />

WELDING<br />

ASSEMBLY<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> CHECKLIST QUESTION CORRECTIVE ACTION<br />

If parts are tagged with red Non-Conformance Non Conformance Tag, is<br />

the tag complete with 1) part number, 2) date and 3)<br />

description of the discrepancy 4) disposition?<br />

Verify machine process settings are correct as per the<br />

set-up set up sheet.<br />

Verify that the operators are checking for and<br />

removing any flash from edges of the molded part<br />

Verify that the operators are documenting flash<br />

removal on operator inspection form.<br />

Is the operator using the digital dial-indicator dial indicator to check<br />

the stake height of assembly as per inspection<br />

instructions?<br />

Verify that the #2 temperature gage reads between<br />

140 and 150 degrees Fahrenheit<br />

Verify the operator is applying grease on both the<br />

spring and pivot pin<br />

Verify on three assemblies that the parts are free of<br />

excess grease and flash.<br />

Verify that the handle operates smoothly without<br />

Notify Receiving Inspection<br />

Supervisor.<br />

Notify Molding Manager. Inform<br />

Quality Inspector to begin<br />

containment.<br />

Notify Molding Manager. Inform<br />

Quality Inspector to begin<br />

containment and initiate a C.A.R..<br />

Notify department supervisor.<br />

Notify department supervisor.(Error<br />

Detection device at next station is set<br />

to reject nonconforming parts.)<br />

Notify area supervisor and<br />

Engineering Manager. Inform Quality<br />

Inspector to begin containment.<br />

Notify Assembly Supervisor Inform<br />

Quality Inspector to begin<br />

containment and initiate a C.A.R..<br />

Notify Assembly Supervisor Inform<br />

Quality Inspector to begin<br />

containment.<br />

36<br />

Notify Assembly Supervisor Inform


2. Developing <strong>LPA</strong> Check Sheet<br />

Make sure EACH process has its own specific <strong>LPA</strong><br />

Complete <strong>LPA</strong>s at the beginning of shift(s) shift(s<br />

Critical plant processes are addressed<br />

All “No No’s” or non-conformances non conformances should be addressed<br />

immediately<br />

Do not ever consider an <strong>LPA</strong> as final. It is a living<br />

document that should be updated regularly with corrective<br />

actions, error-mistake error mistake proofing, etc.<br />

Do not create one <strong>LPA</strong> for a whole facility. Do not make an<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> generic.<br />

37


2. Developing <strong>LPA</strong> Check Sheet<br />

Items are NEVER removed unless there is a<br />

product/process change or improvement.<br />

<strong>Audits</strong> should include visual checks<br />

“Verify Verify somebody doing something right.” right.<br />

All quality issues should be addressed with<br />

corrective action updated in the <strong>LPA</strong>s. <strong>LPA</strong>s<br />

If separate part numbers, or different<br />

customer’s customer s parts share a common line, it should<br />

be audited at different times to include all parts.<br />

38


3. <strong>LPA</strong> Implementation<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> Implementation Plan<br />

Elements…<br />

Elements<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> Structure & Frequency<br />

Check sheets for each <strong>Process</strong><br />

Training of Employees<br />

Tracking Issues & Compliance<br />

Non-Conformance Non Conformance Corrective Action<br />

Procedure<br />

Management Review of <strong>LPA</strong> Results<br />

39


<strong>LPA</strong> Structure & Frequency<br />

<strong>Process</strong> Control Audit<br />

Once per shift done by group leaders or supervisors<br />

Management performs audits weekly<br />

Divide manufacturing areas and rotate so all areas are audited<br />

Error & Mistake Proofing Verification Audit<br />

Once per shift, at the start of each shift, done by Maintenance, Set-up<br />

or Quality Auditor<br />

Minimum frequency requirements shall be met.<br />

Any scheduled audit must be performed to maintain discipline and<br />

improve quality.<br />

40


<strong>LPA</strong> Structure & Frequency<br />

Plant Manager<br />

1 X Week<br />

Area Management<br />

2 X Week<br />

Production Supervisor<br />

1 X Shift<br />

• Encourages Management Involvement<br />

• Encourages Operator Feedback<br />

• Establishes Accountability<br />

41


EXAMPLE: <strong>LPA</strong> FREQUENCY AND STRUCTURE<br />

42


Train Auditors<br />

Training of Employees<br />

Once the <strong>LPA</strong> plan is approved, the Supplier shall train their <strong>Layered</strong><br />

<strong>Process</strong> Auditors.<br />

Auditors must understand <strong>LPA</strong> strategy and purpose.<br />

Review checklist and reactions with auditors<br />

Auditors must know to respond immediately after finding a<br />

nonconformance.<br />

EMPV Auditors shall be qualified to perform error and mistake proofing<br />

verification.<br />

Perform a practice audit where appropriate.<br />

43


Notify Workforce<br />

Explain why the <strong>LPA</strong> is being implemented.<br />

Explain the purpose and benefits of the <strong>LPA</strong> process.<br />

Inform workforce of <strong>LPA</strong> activity and what to expect when audits are<br />

performed in their work areas.<br />

Encourage workforce feedback.<br />

Training of Employees<br />

Communicate <strong>LPA</strong> results frequently.<br />

44


Corrective Actions shall be documented as required by ISO/TS<br />

Summary of audit results: Pareto of non-conformances<br />

non conformances<br />

Frequency of Management Review<br />

Management Reaction Plan for <strong>LPA</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit Schedule & Tracking Tracking<br />

system<br />

Develop<br />

.<br />

Tracking Issues & Compliance<br />

- Corrective Action Request forms for non-conformnces<br />

non conformnces<br />

- Summary of on-time/missed/late on time/missed/late audit completion<br />

There must be a system to maintain the audit schedule and track<br />

completion.<br />

.<br />

45


Tracking Issues & Compliance<br />

Review audit results frequently when starting process.<br />

Improve audit checklist based on auditor feedback.<br />

Management must instill discipline early in the process to complete audits<br />

on time and provide resources for immediate corrective action.<br />

Develop and apply Lessons Learned to improve audit.<br />

If audit issue is found, work for corrective action that is within TAKT time.。<br />

46


<strong>LPA</strong>s used as a training tool – new supervisors, new<br />

shift of associates.<br />

Clipboard required!<br />

Tracking Issues & Compliance<br />

Do NOT push 100% compliance! Make problems<br />

visible.<br />

Have a “system system” to deal with audit item non-<br />

compliance.<br />

Track non-compliances non compliances and report out at plant<br />

manager level.<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> should be completed by plant management- management No<br />

delegating allowed!<br />

47


4. Monitor & Adjust Plan<br />

Develop a Monitoring <strong>Process</strong> and<br />

Reports for Management Review.<br />

Improvements driven by the <strong>LPA</strong><br />

process shall be measured,<br />

monitored, and reported to<br />

management as per <strong>Chrysler</strong> Group TS<br />

Customer Specifics (4.2.1.9.1).<br />

48


Example:<br />

4. Monitor & Adjust Plan<br />

49


Example:<br />

4. Monitor & Adjust Plan<br />

50


Manufacturing Location Summary<br />

cators<br />

Line Supervisor Plan vs. Actual<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov<br />

No. of Total <strong>LPA</strong> Auditable Items Planned 计划<br />

No. of Total <strong>LPA</strong> Auditable Items Actual 实际<br />

Top Management Plan vs. Actual<br />

高层管理计划与实际的比较<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov<br />

No. of Total <strong>LPA</strong> Auditable Items Planned 计划<br />

No. of Total <strong>LPA</strong> Auditable Items Actual 实际<br />

4. Monitor & Adjust Plan<br />

Middle Management Plan vs. Actual<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov<br />

No. of Total <strong>LPA</strong> Auditable Items Planned 计划<br />

No. of Total <strong>LPA</strong> Auditable Items Actual 实际<br />

Please note请注意:<br />

1. This shows three levels of management. <strong>Chrysler</strong><br />

Group TS requirements state that the supplier must<br />

have “multiple levels” of management.<br />

2. The number of <strong>LPA</strong> auditable items refers to the number<br />

of items on the <strong>LPA</strong> checklist multiplied by the<br />

number of times the items are checked in that month.<br />

51


4. Monitor & Adjust Plan<br />

Manufacturing Location Summary<br />

cators<br />

FTC<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov<br />

FTC<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> Non-Conformance Corrective<br />

Action Status<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov<br />

Open 未解决 Closed 已解决<br />

52


5. Summary<br />

The <strong>LPA</strong> is an audit of the process. process<br />

The <strong>LPA</strong> checklist is a living document. Plant<br />

Management must remain involved and committed<br />

to the <strong>LPA</strong> process.<br />

The Customer shall review <strong>LPA</strong> as part of corrective<br />

action (s) for quality issues.<br />

53


Start Up / Shut Down<br />

<strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit (<strong>LPA</strong>)<br />

54


Start Up / Shut Down<br />

<strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit<br />

Improvement Strategy<br />

Increase <strong>LPA</strong> expectations around shut<br />

down events<br />

– Increase <strong>LPA</strong> frequency prior to and post<br />

shut down<br />

– Extra attention on:<br />

__ Job Set Up<br />

__ Containment Activities<br />

__ Error/Mistake Proofing<br />

55


Normal<br />

<strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit<br />

Purpose<br />

Ensure continuous conformance,<br />

improve process<br />

stability and first-time first time-through through<br />

capability.<br />

Benefits<br />

Improves quality, productivity, and<br />

cost<br />

Creates engaged workforce –<br />

prevents errors<br />

Improves communication and<br />

standardization<br />

Allows constant identification of<br />

“biggest opportunities”<br />

Creates effective deployment of<br />

resources<br />

Expectations<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> audits performed by multiple<br />

levels of management<br />

Top management at plant<br />

conducting <strong>LPA</strong>’s at least once per<br />

week<br />

<strong>LPA</strong>’s conducted at least once per<br />

shift for build techniques and<br />

craftsmanship related processes,<br />

and once per day on all Error<br />

Lessons<br />

Learned<br />

<strong>LPA</strong><br />

<strong>LPA</strong><br />

Checklist<br />

Checklist<br />

Management<br />

Review Team<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> Action<br />

Plans<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> Audit<br />

Teams<br />

Error &<br />

Mistake<br />

Proofing<br />

Verification<br />

56


Start Up / Shut Down<br />

<strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit<br />

Purpose<br />

Ensure continuous conformance,<br />

improve process<br />

stability and first-time first time-through through<br />

capability.<br />

Start Up / Shut Down<br />

Benefits<br />

Improves quality, productivity, and<br />

cost<br />

Creates engaged workforce –<br />

prevents errors<br />

Improves communication and<br />

standardization<br />

Allows constant identification of<br />

“biggest opportunities”<br />

Creates effective deployment of<br />

resources<br />

Expectations<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> audits performed by multiple<br />

levels of management<br />

Top management at plant<br />

conducting <strong>LPA</strong>’s at least once per<br />

week<br />

<strong>LPA</strong>’s conducted at least once per<br />

shift for build techniques and<br />

craftsmanship related processes,<br />

and once per day on all Error<br />

Start<br />

Up<br />

Check<br />

List<br />

Looking for<br />

high risk<br />

potential<br />

Plant<br />

manager<br />

& Direct<br />

reports<br />

<strong>LPA</strong> Audit<br />

Teams<br />

<strong>LPA</strong><br />

<strong>LPA</strong><br />

Checklist<br />

Checklist<br />

Normal <strong>LPA</strong><br />

Keep Eye On<br />

The Ball<br />

57


Start Up / Shut Down<br />

<strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit<br />

Things for you to consider:<br />

1. Modify the Start Up / Shut Down <strong>LPA</strong><br />

to your plant processes/needs<br />

2. Instruct people on role:<br />

First line - Use normal <strong>LPA</strong><br />

Top Management - use Start Up /<br />

Shut Down <strong>LPA</strong><br />

3. Drive the <strong>LPA</strong> schedule<br />

30 days before shut down<br />

30 days after shut down<br />

4. Use it at your own discretion<br />

58


Date:______________Project<br />

#______________<br />

Item # <strong>LPA</strong> Question Expectations Y/N Corrective Action & Timing<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

• SHIFT DOWN / START OF PRODUCTION<br />

All questions are to be answered with a "Y" for yes (acceptable or compliant), or "N"<br />

for no (unacceptable or non-compliant) in the status box.<br />

Non-compliances are to have corrective action with timing recorded in the space<br />

pro ided<br />

Assumptions for using this document:<br />

- Intent of these questions is that the operator is performing a new operation.<br />

- Normal <strong>LPA</strong> is being followed.<br />

O i f t i i i l<br />

MANPOWER TURNOVER & RE-LEARNING<br />

Do you know the percentage of<br />

new Operators for the process?<br />

Percentage: %<br />

Is there a documented process<br />

for training new operators, and are<br />

records of training kept?<br />

Have Control Plan frequencies and<br />

sample sizes been increased to<br />

reflect the increased risk of<br />

nonconformances during the<br />

learning curve period?<br />

Is the process unchanged since<br />

the operator last performed the<br />

task?<br />

Are the operators following the<br />

posted operator instructions, and<br />

are the work insrtuctions up-todate?<br />

Management has a clear<br />

perspective of the number of new<br />

operators on each job. This needs<br />

to drive training plan and an<br />

enhanced control plan during the<br />

learning curve period.<br />

Untrained operators pose risk to<br />

assembly. Only certified operators<br />

are allowed to perform specific<br />

tasks without backup.<br />

The risk of nonconformances is<br />

highest as operators are learning a<br />

process. Inspection frequencies<br />

should be increased to<br />

compensate.<br />

Operators require education of<br />

process changes or deviations that<br />

could effect their job.<br />

Confirm operators are following the<br />

correct operator instructions.<br />

59


Date:______________Projec<br />

t#<br />

Item # <strong>LPA</strong> Question Expectations Y/N Corrective Action & Timing<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

• SHIFT DOWN / START OF PRODUCTION<br />

All questions are to be answered with a "Y" for yes (acceptable or compliant),<br />

or "N" for no (unacceptable or non-compliant) in the status box.<br />

N li t h ti ti ith ti i d d i th<br />

Assumptions for using this document:<br />

- Intent of these questions is that the operator is performing a new operation.<br />

- Normal <strong>LPA</strong> is being followed.<br />

- On-going manufacturing process remains in place.<br />

Do you have a plan to<br />

rebalance, or have you already<br />

rebalanced, the process (if<br />

necessary)?<br />

If the process needs to be<br />

rebalanced, have you reverified<br />

the process, such as<br />

with a <strong>Process</strong> Sign-Off?<br />

If the process needs to be<br />

rebalanced, have you gotten<br />

approval from <strong>Chrysler</strong> for any<br />

process changes necessary<br />

through the "Forever"<br />

Requirements system?<br />

Line rebalancing may be<br />

necessary to account for lower<br />

volumes and reduced manpower<br />

available.<br />

Confirmation of process<br />

capability, FTC, etc. after<br />

rebalancing.<br />

Get approval from <strong>Chrysler</strong> for<br />

all process changes prior to<br />

implementing those changes.<br />

60


Date:______________Project<br />

#______________<br />

Item # <strong>LPA</strong> Question Expectations Y/N Corrective Action & Timing<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

• SHIFT DOWN / START OF PRODUCTION<br />

All questions are to be answered with a "Y" for yes (acceptable or compliant), or<br />

"N" for no (unacceptable or non-compliant) in the status box.<br />

Non-compliances are to have corrective action with timing recorded in the space<br />

Assumptions for using this document:<br />

- Intent of these questions is that the operator is performing a new operation.<br />

- Normal <strong>LPA</strong> is being followed.<br />

- On-going manufacturing process remains in place.<br />

MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES<br />

Have maintenance activities<br />

been continued as scheduled?<br />

Are maintenance Set-Up parts<br />

controlled and segregated? Are<br />

parts identified / labeled? Is<br />

there a designated location for<br />

maintenance parts? Is there a<br />

process to confirm the quality<br />

of parts produced during<br />

maintenance or set-up activity<br />

(e.g. First Pi<br />

Have all maintenance/setup<br />

parts been purged from Work<br />

Cell areas? Have questionable<br />

parts produced during<br />

maintenance efforts been<br />

quarantined?<br />

Maintenance schedule must be<br />

maintained.<br />

Set-up parts, boundary samples,<br />

etc. must be controlled to avoid<br />

mixing with production parts.<br />

Set-up parts, boundary samples,<br />

etc. must be controlled to avoid<br />

mixing with production parts.<br />

61


12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

• SHIFT DOWN / START OF PRODUCTION<br />

All questions are to be answered with a "Y" for yes (acceptable or compliant), or<br />

"N" for no (unacceptable or non-compliant) in the status box.<br />

Non-compliances are to have corrective action with timing recorded in the space<br />

Assumptions for using this document:<br />

- Intent of these questions is that the operator is performing a new operation.<br />

- Normal <strong>LPA</strong> is being followed.<br />

- On-going manufacturing process remains in place.<br />

Have you verified expiration<br />

dates or shelf-life of raw<br />

materials, WIP, and finished<br />

goods?<br />

MATERIALS<br />

Are all material expiration dates<br />

tracked and maintained?<br />

Are material maintenance<br />

requirements being followed?<br />

Are all materials at the work<br />

station acceptable (i.e. not past<br />

their expiration date)?<br />

Materials may sit unused for<br />

longer periods of time during<br />

periods of low volume<br />

production.<br />

Inventory control process are<br />

followed (e.g. FIFO)<br />

Materials are being stored<br />

correctly; e.g. humidity<br />

requirements, temperature levels,<br />

covered if required, Agitation<br />

Rates, etc.<br />

Replace and quarantine all<br />

expired material.<br />

Date:______________Project<br />

#______________<br />

62


• SHIFT DOWN / START OF PRODUCTION<br />

All questions are to be answered with a "Y" for yes (acceptable or compliance),<br />

or "N" for no (unacceptable or non-compliance) in the status box.<br />

Non-compliances are to have corrective action with timing recorded in the space<br />

Date:______________Project #<br />

______________<br />

Item # <strong>LPA</strong> Question Expectations Y/N Corrective Action & Timing<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

ERROR AND MISTAKE PROOFING AND NONCONFORMANCE<br />

HANDLING<br />

Are operators trained on the<br />

use and reaction to Error and<br />

Mistake Proofing systems?<br />

Has the standard <strong>LPA</strong> been<br />

updated as needed (e.g.<br />

additional questions, auditors,<br />

etc.) for the volume change,<br />

especially related to operator<br />

support and training?<br />

Are operators trained in the<br />

nonconformance handling<br />

procedures?<br />

CONTAINMENT<br />

Are trained personnel readily<br />

available for immediate<br />

implementation of containment<br />

and corrective action when<br />

nonconformances are<br />

discovered?<br />

Operators are trained/certified in<br />

Error/Mistake Proofing systems,<br />

verification, and reaction plans.<br />

The normal <strong>LPA</strong> has been<br />

enhanced to reflect the special<br />

circumstance associated with the<br />

volume reduction. Additional<br />

management auditors may be<br />

required (e.g. Manufactruing<br />

Engineers etc).<br />

Operators understand how to<br />

handle nonconforming material.<br />

Containment (at both the Supplier<br />

and <strong>Chrysler</strong> facilities) and<br />

corrective actions are<br />

implemented immediately upon<br />

discovery of nonconforming<br />

material.<br />

63


Date:______________Project<br />

#______________<br />

Item # <strong>LPA</strong> Question Expectations Y/N Corrective Action & Timing<br />

JOB SET-UP<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

• SHIFT DOWN / START OF PRODUCTION<br />

All questions are to be answered with a "Y" for yes (acceptable or compliant), or "N" for no (unacceptable or<br />

non-compliant) in the status box.<br />

Non-compliances are to have corrective action with timing recorded in the space provided.<br />

Assumptions for using this document:<br />

- Intent of these questions is that the operator is performing a new operation.<br />

- Normal <strong>LPA</strong> is being followed.<br />

- On-going manufacturing process remains in place.<br />

Have process set-up procedures been reviewed<br />

and updated to account for volume reductions?<br />

Have you reviewed the volume reduction with<br />

your Supply Base, including risk assesments,<br />

cascading requirements, and responsibilities?<br />

Have any necessary process changes in your<br />

Supply Base been communicated to you, and<br />

requested and approved by <strong>Chrysler</strong> through the<br />

"Forever" Requirements?<br />

Are all appropriate personnel (at your facility and<br />

in the Supply Base) trained in the "Forever"<br />

Requirements system (e.g. when to initiate a<br />

"Forever" Requirements change request, how to<br />

use the WebCN/FR system, etc.)? Have all<br />

potential "Forever" Requirements changes been<br />

approved by <strong>Chrysler</strong>?<br />

Have all potential "Forever" Requirements<br />

changes been approved by <strong>Chrysler</strong>?<br />

SUPPLY BASE MANAGEMENT<br />

FOREVER REQUIREMENTS<br />

The Supplier has documented process set-up<br />

procedures/instructions, including easy<br />

access to set-up requirements (e.g. control<br />

limits, independent verification, first-piece/lastpiece<br />

approval procedures, etc).<br />

Communicate to the Supply Base on the<br />

impact of volume reductions. Share risk<br />

analysis.<br />

Ensure communication through the Supply<br />

Base regarding all process changes.<br />

Proactively communicate with <strong>Chrysler</strong>, know<br />

when to raise the flag<br />

Notify <strong>Chrysler</strong> of proposed material or<br />

process changes<br />

Notify <strong>Chrysler</strong> of proposed manufacturing<br />

changes<br />

Watch for sub supplier issues and tell<br />

<strong>Chrysler</strong> about them<br />

Notify <strong>Chrysler</strong> of potential supply / capacity<br />

issues<br />

Proactively communicate with <strong>Chrysler</strong>, know<br />

when to raise the flag<br />

Notify <strong>Chrysler</strong> of proposed material or<br />

process changes<br />

Notify <strong>Chrysler</strong> of proposed manufacturing<br />

changes<br />

Watch for sub supplier issues and tell<br />

<strong>Chrysler</strong> about them<br />

Notify <strong>Chrysler</strong> of potential supply / capacity<br />

issues<br />

64


1. <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> <strong>Audits</strong> are:<br />

a. A system of audits performed by corporate quality to verify process<br />

conformance<br />

b. A system of audits performed by a 3rd party organization to verify process<br />

conformance.<br />

c. A system of audits performed by multiple levels of management to verify<br />

process conformance.<br />

d. A system of audits performed by operators and line supervisors to verify<br />

process conformance.<br />

2. The two type of <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> <strong>Audits</strong> are:<br />

a. <strong>Process</strong> Control <strong>Audits</strong> and Preventive Maintenance <strong>Audits</strong><br />

b. <strong>Process</strong> Monitoring <strong>Audits</strong> and Error & Mistake Proofing Verification <strong>Audits</strong><br />

c. <strong>Process</strong> Control <strong>Audits</strong> and Error & Mistake Proofing Verification <strong>Audits</strong><br />

3. Who can perform <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> <strong>Audits</strong> (<strong>LPA</strong>)?<br />

a. Auditors trained in <strong>LPA</strong> and TS-16949<br />

b. Certified quality auditors<br />

c. Anyone trained in <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> <strong>Audits</strong><br />

<strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> <strong>Audits</strong><br />

PRE/POST TEST<br />

65


4. Who owns the <strong>LPA</strong> process?<br />

a. Manufacturing<br />

b. Quality<br />

c. All of the above<br />

5. The responsibility of the Plant Manager is to:<br />

a. Verify all <strong>LPA</strong> audits are being performed according to schedule<br />

b. Conduct <strong>Process</strong> Control <strong>Audits</strong> on a weekly basis.<br />

c. Review all non-conformances and verify they have permanent corrective action.<br />

d. a and c;<br />

6. Some benefits of <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> <strong>Audits</strong> are.<br />

a. Reduction of build variation and defects<br />

b. Improvement of First Time through capability<br />

c. Facilitation of operator training and improvement of morale<br />

d. a and b;<br />

e. all of the above<br />

<strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit<br />

PRE/POST TEST<br />

66


7. Which of the following is not a part of developing the <strong>LPA</strong> plan?<br />

a. Form a <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit team<br />

b. Obtain <strong>Chrysler</strong> SQA approval of plan<br />

c. Develop audit checklist<br />

d. Determine audit frequency<br />

8. The <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit is _________ focused?<br />

a. Part<br />

b. <strong>Process</strong><br />

c. Part and process<br />

9. During the <strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit the auditor should randomly select process<br />

and/or product characteristics to be measured to ensure they are within<br />

specification?<br />

a. True<br />

b. False<br />

<strong>Layered</strong> <strong>Process</strong> Audit<br />

PRE/POST TEST<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!