06.07.2013 Views

Medial Spheres for Shape Representation - CIM - McGill University

Medial Spheres for Shape Representation - CIM - McGill University

Medial Spheres for Shape Representation - CIM - McGill University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 2–2: <strong>Medial</strong> axes, in black, <strong>for</strong> two solids with red boundaries. The boundary on<br />

the right is obtained by smoothing the boundary on the left. Produced with [84].<br />

original object. The nature of significance, or “salience”, is application dependent: <strong>for</strong><br />

motion planning, an exact medial surface is sometimes necessary, while <strong>for</strong> matching and<br />

animation, a medial surface of minimal geometric complexity that describes the object<br />

shape is sought.<br />

Two common measures of significance of a medial point include<br />

• the radius of the associated medial sphere, and<br />

• the object angle of the medial point, defined as follows:<br />

Definition 2.1. For a smooth medial point p, the object angle θ is the angle between the<br />

vector from p to either of its two closest points on B and the tangent plane to MS at p.<br />

Figure 2–3(Left) gives an example of how the object angle θ is evaluated. As shown<br />

in [53], removal of medial points that have a small object angle has a small impact on the<br />

volume of the union of medial balls (refer to Figure 2–3(Right)). When it is desirable to<br />

preserve the volume of the solid being approximated, eliminating medial points with small<br />

object angle is an appropriate simplification measure.<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!