07.07.2013 Views

9 Interlayer Exchange Interactions in Magnetic Multilayers

9 Interlayer Exchange Interactions in Magnetic Multilayers

9 Interlayer Exchange Interactions in Magnetic Multilayers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

340 9 <strong>Interlayer</strong> <strong>Exchange</strong> <strong>Interactions</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Magnetic</strong> <strong>Multilayers</strong><br />

In this case the electron conf<strong>in</strong>ement <strong>in</strong> the overlayer gives rise to a sp<strong>in</strong>-dependent<br />

modulation of the spectral density as the overlayer thickness is changed; the period<br />

of the modulation is the same for both sp<strong>in</strong>s, whereas the amplitude and phase are<br />

expected to be sp<strong>in</strong>-dependent.<br />

The quantum size effects <strong>in</strong> paramagnetic overlayers on a ferromagnetic substrate<br />

have been <strong>in</strong>vestigated by several groups [85–98]. The systems studied most are Cu<br />

overlayers on a Co(001) substrate and Ag overlayers on a Fe(001) substrate. Ortega<br />

and Himpsel [86, 87] observed a quantum size effect <strong>in</strong> the normal-emission photoelectron<br />

spectra of a copper overlayer on a fcc cobalt (001) substrate. They observed<br />

peaks aris<strong>in</strong>g as a result of quantum size effects, and an oscillation of the photoemission<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>in</strong> both, the photoemission and <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>verse photoemission spectra.<br />

These quantum size effects manifest themselves also <strong>in</strong> the form of oscillatory behavior<br />

<strong>in</strong> the photoemission <strong>in</strong>tensity at the Fermi level; because the observed oscillation<br />

period (5.9 atomic layers) is close to the long period of <strong>in</strong>terlayer exchange coupl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

oscillations <strong>in</strong> Co/Cu(001)/Co, it was suggested that the two phenomena should be<br />

related to each other: Ortega and Himpsel also claimed that the observed oscillations<br />

<strong>in</strong> photoemission are sp<strong>in</strong>-dependent and mostly arise from m<strong>in</strong>ority electrons. This<br />

conjecture has been confirmed directly, by Garrison et al. [89] and by Carbone et<br />

al. [90], <strong>in</strong>dependently, by means of sp<strong>in</strong>-polarized photoemission. They found that<br />

both the <strong>in</strong>tensity and the sp<strong>in</strong>-polarization have oscillatory behavior with the same<br />

period (5–6 atomic layers) but opposite phases; this <strong>in</strong>dicates that the quantum-size<br />

effect does <strong>in</strong>deed take place predom<strong>in</strong>antly <strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>ority-sp<strong>in</strong> band, as proposed<br />

by Ortega and Himpsel [86, 87]. Kläsges et al. [96] and Kawakami et al. [98] have recently<br />

observed sp<strong>in</strong>-polarized quantum-size effects <strong>in</strong> a copper overlayer on cobalt<br />

(001) for a non-zero, <strong>in</strong>-plane wavevector correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the short period oscillation<br />

of <strong>in</strong>terlayer exchange coupl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Co/Cu(001)/Co; they observed short-period<br />

oscillations of the photoemission <strong>in</strong>tensity, <strong>in</strong> good agrement with the short-period<br />

oscillations of <strong>in</strong>terlayer coupl<strong>in</strong>g. This observation provides a further confirmation<br />

of the relationship between quantum-size effects <strong>in</strong> photoemission and oscillation<br />

of <strong>in</strong>terlayer exchange coupl<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Photoemission studies of quantum size effects have also been performed on other<br />

types of system, e. g. a ferromagnetic overlayer on a non-magnetic substrate, or<br />

systems compris<strong>in</strong>g more layers [99–103].<br />

Photoemission spectroscopy undoubtedly constitutes a method of choice for <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

quantum-size effects <strong>in</strong> metallic overlayers; this is because its unique<br />

features enable selectivity <strong>in</strong> energy, <strong>in</strong>-plane wavevector, and sp<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Besides photemission, sp<strong>in</strong>-polarized quantum-size effects <strong>in</strong> paramagnetic overlayers<br />

on a ferromagnetic substrate also cause oscillatory behavior (which depends<br />

on overlayer thickness) of sp<strong>in</strong>-polarized secondary electron emission [104, 105], l<strong>in</strong>ear<br />

[106–111], and non-l<strong>in</strong>ear [112, 113] magneto-optical Kerr effect, and magnetic<br />

anisotropy [114, 115]. These effects usually, however, <strong>in</strong>volve a summation over all<br />

electronic states, and so quantitative analysis of these quantum-size effects may be<br />

fairly complicated.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!