07.07.2013 Views

9 Interlayer Exchange Interactions in Magnetic Multilayers

9 Interlayer Exchange Interactions in Magnetic Multilayers

9 Interlayer Exchange Interactions in Magnetic Multilayers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

330 9 <strong>Interlayer</strong> <strong>Exchange</strong> <strong>Interactions</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Magnetic</strong> <strong>Multilayers</strong><br />

netic layers. Historically, this type of <strong>in</strong>teraction was first proposed by Ruderman<br />

and Kittel to describe the <strong>in</strong>direct <strong>in</strong>teractions between nuclear sp<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> a metal<br />

[2], and then extended to electronic magnetic moments by Kasuya [3] and Yosida<br />

[4]. This <strong>in</strong>teraction has received a much attention, <strong>in</strong> particular <strong>in</strong> the context of<br />

dilute magnetic alloys. Neither theoretical predictions, nor the experiment results,<br />

were, however, sufficiently precise to enable fully understand<strong>in</strong>g of this mechanism<br />

and quantitative test<strong>in</strong>g of the theoretical predictions. Indirect exchange <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />

have received <strong>in</strong>tensly renewed attention s<strong>in</strong>ce 1990 <strong>in</strong> the context of magnetic multilayers<br />

– <strong>in</strong>deed, <strong>in</strong> contrast with the situation of a dilute alloy, <strong>in</strong> which the distance<br />

between magnetic impurities is randomly distributed, multilayers enable controlled<br />

variation of the distance between successive magnetic layers and their crystallographic<br />

orientation; this enables a very detailled study of <strong>in</strong>direct exchange <strong>in</strong>teractions.<br />

In this chapter we present an overview of the state-of-the-art of our understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of <strong>in</strong>terlayer coupl<strong>in</strong>g as a result of <strong>in</strong>direct exchange <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong> transition metal<br />

multilayers. In Section 2 we give a short overview of the experimental observations.<br />

This is followed by an overview of the theoretical approaches that have been used to<br />

describe the <strong>in</strong>terlayer exchange coupl<strong>in</strong>g (Section 3). Theoretical description based<br />

upon the idea of sp<strong>in</strong>-dependent quantum conf<strong>in</strong>ement is presented <strong>in</strong> Section 4. The<br />

behavior obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the limit of large spacer thickness is discussed <strong>in</strong> Section 5, and<br />

the dependence of <strong>in</strong>terlayer exchange coupl<strong>in</strong>g on magnetic layer thickness and on<br />

overlayer thickness are treated <strong>in</strong> Sections 6 and 7, respectively. The amplitude and<br />

phase of <strong>in</strong>terlayer coupl<strong>in</strong>g oscillations are discussed <strong>in</strong> Section 8.<br />

9.2 Survey of Experimental Observations<br />

<strong>Interlayer</strong> magnetic <strong>in</strong>teractions were first reported <strong>in</strong> rare-earth superlattices [5,<br />

6]. Rare-earth multilayers will not, however, be considered here, and the reader is<br />

refered to recent review papers on this subject [7, 8].<br />

For transition metals systems, antiferromagnetic <strong>in</strong>terlayer exchange coupl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

Fe/Cr/Fe layers was first reported by Grünberg et al. [9]. They observed an antiferromagnetic<br />

<strong>in</strong>terlayer <strong>in</strong>teraction, decay<strong>in</strong>g regularly with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g Cr spacer<br />

thickness. Phenomenologically, the <strong>in</strong>terlayer <strong>in</strong>teraction energy per unit area can<br />

be expressed as<br />

E(θ) = J cos θ, (1)<br />

where θ is the angle between the magnetizations of the two magnetic layers, and J is<br />

called the <strong>in</strong>terlayer coupl<strong>in</strong>g coupl<strong>in</strong>g constant. With the sign convention adopted<br />

here, a positive (negative) value of J relates to an antiferromagnetic (ferromagnetic)<br />

type of coupl<strong>in</strong>g. One should pay attention to the fact that other conventions for the<br />

sign and normalization of the coupl<strong>in</strong>g constant are frequently found <strong>in</strong> the literature.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!