12.07.2013 Views

Bare-Faced Messiah (PDF) - Apologetics Index

Bare-Faced Messiah (PDF) - Apologetics Index

Bare-Faced Messiah (PDF) - Apologetics Index

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Foreword<br />

By Chris Owen<br />

Truth, fiction and L. Ron Hubbard<br />

"What is true is what is true for you."<br />

- L. Ron Hubbard<br />

There are two wildly conflicting versions of the life story of L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of the<br />

Church of Scientology, The first, promoted by the Church, is that he was an unfailingly honest,<br />

generous humanitarian whose profound insights have transformed the world. The second,<br />

propounded in its fullest form in <strong>Bare</strong>-<strong>Faced</strong> <strong>Messiah</strong> by Russell Miller, is that he was a<br />

pathological liar, a fraud consumed by greed and paranoia who sucked literally millions of people<br />

into an extraordinary fantasy world.<br />

The quotation above is one was one of Hubbard's favourite aphorisms, highlighting his claim that<br />

subjective truth is all that matters. If that's correct, then either account is equally plausible. But if<br />

objective truth is at all important, relying on evidence and reason rather than pure belief, then <strong>Bare</strong>-<br />

<strong>Faced</strong> <strong>Messiah</strong> is considerably more convincing. I have provided links between Miller's account of<br />

Hubbard's life and that of the Church of Scientology (on their Web site, http://www.lronhubbard.org).<br />

Compare and contrast the two biographies, look at the supporting evidence and then decide for<br />

yourself.<br />

Why is the biography of L. Ron Hubbard important in the first place? The obvious reason is that it<br />

calls into question the whole validity of Scientology. Some Scientologists have acknowledged<br />

privately that Hubbard's official biography may be inaccurate, but that it doesn't invalidate his work.<br />

That may be so, but for those who take this view, consider this point: as a great deal of the<br />

inaccuracies in his biography originate with the man himself, what else was he inaccurate about? If<br />

Hubbard lied about his life, what else did he lie about?<br />

This argument is, incidentally, not one that is lost on the leadership of the Church of Scientology;<br />

Russell Miller faced considerable harassment and legal action from the Church before it was<br />

possible to publish <strong>Bare</strong>-<strong>Faced</strong> <strong>Messiah</strong>. The court which permitted him to do so in Britain pointed<br />

out, quite correctly, that Hubbard was a figure of considerable public interest whose reputation was<br />

used by the Church to promote itself - and that a biography of his life was therefore prima facie in<br />

the public interest.<br />

<strong>Bare</strong>-<strong>Faced</strong> <strong>Messiah</strong> is out of print now, but this argument remains no less strong. That is why I<br />

have reproduced the book on the Web, with Mr Miller's permission; not because I have any desire to<br />

damage the Church of Scientology but because I believe strongly that it is in the public interest to<br />

make his well-researched book available to a wider audience. Here for the first time, then, is an<br />

electronic version of <strong>Bare</strong>-<strong>Faced</strong> <strong>Messiah</strong>.<br />

Conversion to Adobe Acrobat pdf format by an anonymous friend.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!