Alley Gating Failsworth & Hollinwood PDF 88 KB
Alley Gating Failsworth & Hollinwood PDF 88 KB
Alley Gating Failsworth & Hollinwood PDF 88 KB
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ALLEYGATING – FAILSWORTH &<br />
HOLLINWOOD<br />
Report of the Head of Community Safety Services<br />
Portfolio Responsibility: Environment and Infrastructure<br />
05 th November 2010<br />
Officer Contact: Philip Bonworth<br />
Ext. 1592<br />
Purpose of Report<br />
This report has been prepared at the request of local ward councillors, in<br />
response to their highlighting of a location, which they believe would benefit<br />
from alleygating due to quality of life issues, which are seriously affecting<br />
residents living within the intended scheme.<br />
Executive Summary<br />
The Borough of Oldham has a very high proportion of terraced properties and<br />
as a result has a lot of alleyways. These alleyways are utilised as a route of<br />
access for residents to the rear of their properties. Unfortunately alleyways<br />
also provide access for criminals, providing burglars with the means to break<br />
in from the rear of the house. Residents with rears alleyways also often<br />
experience anti-social behaviour, environmental crime and other forms of<br />
criminal activity.<br />
This report will outline problems identified by GMP analysts at this location,<br />
provide an approximate costing of the scheme and outline the process that<br />
will be required if the District Partnership determines that the gating of this<br />
alleyway would be funded through District Partnership monies, subject to<br />
resident approval and a gating order for this location being successfully<br />
obtained.<br />
This report will also provide a further update on those schemes funded by the<br />
District Partnership from their 2009/2010 budgets. This update has been<br />
attached to the report as Appendix A.
Recommendations<br />
For the <strong>Failsworth</strong> & <strong>Hollinwood</strong> District Partnership to consider approval for<br />
funding to install alleygates, in the area identified below: This funding to come<br />
from the Safe, Clean & Green budget allocated to <strong>Failsworth</strong> & <strong>Hollinwood</strong>.<br />
<strong>Failsworth</strong> West Ward (Police Beat Q3 Q5)<br />
There is one scheme listed for <strong>Failsworth</strong> West in the body of this report. This<br />
scheme has not come to the notice of the Community Safety Service for<br />
issues with burglary. However, there have been anecdotal complaints of antisocial<br />
behaviour from residents, both to Ward Councillors and Council<br />
Officers.<br />
Scheme 791 , which encompasses 1-19 Hardman street, <strong>Failsworth</strong> and the<br />
business premise to the rear, offers some problems in terms of gating. The<br />
alleyway is an adopted highway. This issue can potentially be overcome by<br />
the pursuit of a gating order at this location. However, a count of crimes and<br />
Anti-Social Behaviour reports at this location indicates that there has been<br />
only a single report of crime at this location and that there have been no<br />
reports of Anti-Social Behaviour (Information drawn from GMP’s systems for<br />
period 1/11/09-31/10/10). The offence that occurred was however, an<br />
aggravated vehicle taking, where entry to steal the vehicle was gained via the<br />
alley.<br />
There is also an issue of where to install the gate which would be sited<br />
nearest to No.1 Hardman Street. The business premise at the rear of the<br />
properties (which I believe is currently unnoccupied) has fire escape access,<br />
which leads directly into the alleyway, close to the rear of 1 Hardman Street.<br />
Siting of the gate near to the rear of the alleyway, which would be the most<br />
cost effective option,due to the open expanse of land at the side of the<br />
property may not be prudent if the business premise is to brought back into<br />
usage, as it may impact on their fire safety procedures.<br />
The second option would be to site the gate to the rear of 3 Hardman Street,<br />
which would mean that the fire exit was not obstructed in any way. However, it<br />
would mean that No.1 Hardman Street would not be protected by the scheme.<br />
If this solution were to be utilised, the Secure Homes Project would look to<br />
target harden No.1 with additional security measures, such as a perimeter<br />
alarm, improved lighting, locks etc. The cost of the gating scheme would be<br />
approximately £2,500.00.<br />
The third option and the preferred option of the Community Safety Service<br />
would be to site the gate parallel to the front gable of No.1 Hardman Street<br />
and to cover the expanse of land at the side of the property, with a weld mesh<br />
type fencing system. This would mean that the fire exit to the business<br />
premise would be inside the gated scheme, however, the scheme could<br />
employ a sheathed quick release lock to this gate as the gate would be far<br />
enough away from the premise so as not to hinder the egress of employees
from the business in the event of a fire. This scheme would cost<br />
approximately £4,500.00.<br />
The above alleyway is a definitive right of way and therefore the<br />
Community Safety Service would be require to make a legal application<br />
in order to install gates.
Report of the <strong>Failsworth</strong> & <strong>Hollinwood</strong> District Partnership from<br />
Community Safety Services.<br />
Portfolio Responsibility: Environment and infrastructure<br />
1 Purpose of Report<br />
1.1 The neighbourhood alleygating report has now been presented to all<br />
District Partnerships. The <strong>Failsworth</strong> & <strong>Hollinwood</strong> report gave not<br />
only an overview on alleygating, but also gave details of those areas<br />
in <strong>Failsworth</strong> & <strong>Hollinwood</strong> that had been identified as areas suffering<br />
from a range of problems including anti social behaviour and various<br />
other types of sub criminal activity. All these areas had been<br />
identified as areas that would benefit by the installation of alleygates.<br />
1.2 The initial report was prepared as an overview and acted as guidance<br />
so that local partnerships could decide as to whether this was a<br />
suitable tactic to deploy in those areas identified as being problem<br />
areas for local residents.<br />
1.3 This supplementary report has been prepared at the request of ward<br />
Councillors to consider gating at a location identified by Councillors as<br />
having a negative effect on the quality of life of residents within the<br />
intended scheme. Residents have also provided anecdotal accounts<br />
of break-ins to garden sheds and anti-social behaviour at this location,<br />
via phone-calls to the Community Safety Service. This report will also<br />
provide an update on gating schemes funded through the District<br />
Partnership from their 2009/2010 budgets. The update has been<br />
attached to the report as Appendix A.<br />
2 Executive Summary<br />
2.1 The Borough of Oldham has a very high proportion of terraced<br />
properties and as a result also has a lot of alleyways that provide<br />
access for residents to the rear of their properties. Unfortunately<br />
alleyways also provide access for criminals providing burglars with the<br />
means to break in from the rear of the house. Residents with rears<br />
alleyways also often experience ant social behaviour and other forms<br />
of criminal activity.<br />
2.2 This report will outline problems identified by GMP analysts at this<br />
location, provide an approximate costing of the scheme and outline the<br />
process that will be required if the District Partnership determines that<br />
the gating of this alleyway would be funded through District Partnership<br />
monies, subject to resident approval and a gating order for this location<br />
being successfully obtained.<br />
2.3 This report will also provide a further update on those schemes funded<br />
by the District Partnership from their 2009/2010 budgets.
3 Recommendations<br />
REFERENCE STREET<br />
791<br />
HARDMAN<br />
STREET<br />
NO. OF<br />
GATES<br />
REQUIRED<br />
2 + RUN OF<br />
WELD MESH<br />
FENCING<br />
AREAS<br />
COVERED COST<br />
1-19<br />
HARDMAN<br />
STREET &<br />
BUSINESS<br />
PREMISE £4,500.00<br />
<strong>Alley</strong>gate scheme 791, Hardman Street has arisen in response to complaints<br />
from residents of criminal behaviour and anti-social behaviour at these<br />
locations.<br />
I would envision that this scheme would cost no more than £4,500.00, should<br />
the preferred option of the Community Safety Service be pursued.<br />
3.2 The above alleyway is a definitive right of way and would therefore<br />
require a legal application prior to the installation of alleygates<br />
4 Background<br />
4.1 Residents who live in areas with rear alleyways often experience anti<br />
social behaviour; evidence can be found of drug paraphernalia,<br />
alcohol usage, fly tipping, littering, dog fouling and graffiti.<br />
4.2 Community Safety Services and Oldham Partnership has adopted<br />
many tactics to reduce domestic burglary and anti social behaviour.<br />
One of these tactics is to prevent easy access for criminals to the rear<br />
of homes. The installation of lockable gates at the end of each<br />
alleyway makes access to the rear far more difficult whilst providing<br />
peace of mind to the residents.<br />
4.3 Other forms of target hardening or environmental improvements are<br />
available to reduce crime and disorder. Oldham’s Community Safety<br />
Services regularly uses other tactics including improved lighting,<br />
increased security in dwellings (including alarms, locks, security<br />
lighting) and crime prevention education.<br />
4.4 The benefits of alleygating are considerable and range from real<br />
reductions in levels of domestic burglary through to the creation of<br />
defensible space for local residents. Reclaiming the areas at the rear<br />
of their properties enables residents to create safe places for their<br />
children to play and where they can meet their neighbours and develop<br />
a stronger sense of community. It also provides an area that non<br />
residents find difficult to access so providing residents with an element<br />
of control, enabling them to keep the areas clean and providing an
opportunity for them to enhance the area by making appropriate<br />
environmental improvements such as introducing flowers, planters and<br />
benches.<br />
5 Options/Alternatives<br />
5.1 Other options have been investigated and to large extent many of<br />
these options are still utilised as tactics to reduce domestic burglary,<br />
crime and disorder. Target hardening of properties is a common<br />
option and can be focused on individual properties where individual<br />
and specific problems are identified. This as an option will continue<br />
but alleygating of back alleyways can be more cost effective and has<br />
numerous additional benefits as outlined previously. The average<br />
cost of target hardening a home in Oldham is £180 where the average<br />
cost to securing a home by alleygating is £120.<br />
6 Preferred Option<br />
6.1 The preferred option is for the <strong>Failsworth</strong> & <strong>Hollinwood</strong> District<br />
Partnership to continue with the gating of problem alleyways in<br />
<strong>Failsworth</strong> & <strong>Hollinwood</strong>. To continue this initiative is to continue with<br />
the valuable work already carried out by Community Safety Services<br />
in reducing crime and anti social behaviour in the Royton & Shaw<br />
neighbourhood.<br />
7 Consultation<br />
Resident Consultation<br />
7.1 Ideally, successful alleygating schemes require the support and<br />
consent of all residents who live along the alley to be gated and as<br />
such are directly affected by the closure of the alley. Transitory<br />
resident’s views will be considered in the same way as those of a<br />
permanent resident. Under normal circumstances, consultation does<br />
not take place directly with landlords or Registered Social Landlords,<br />
unless the property is empty or void.<br />
7.2 Initially, letters are sent to all those parties above, detailing the<br />
proposal to gate the alleyway, outlining the advantages and any<br />
possible disadvantages. The letter will be accompanied by a leaflet<br />
and voting form. The completion and return of the form and its<br />
contents will show the initial level of support from local residents.<br />
8 Financial Implications<br />
9 Legal Services Comments<br />
9.1 <strong>Gating</strong> orders are one of the legal methods of restricting access along<br />
a highway. They are made under powers inserted into the Highways<br />
Act 1980 by the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005.
Before making a gating order, the Council must be satisfied that<br />
premises adjoining or adjacent to the highway subject to the order are<br />
affected by crime or anti social behaviour, the existence of the<br />
highway is facilitating the persistent commission of criminal offences<br />
or anti social behaviour and it is in all the circumstances expedient to<br />
make the order for the purposes of reducing crime or anti social<br />
behaviour. In considering whether it is expedient to make the order,<br />
the Council should have regard to the likely effect of making the order<br />
on the occupiers of premises adjoining or adjacent to the highway, the<br />
likely effect of making the order on other persons in the locality and in<br />
a case where the highway constitutes a through route, the availability<br />
of a reasonably convenient alternative route.<br />
9.2 It is not necessary to make a gating order in respect of a private<br />
access which is not a highway, although there may be issues<br />
concerning the restriction of private rights of access. These issues<br />
should be addressed during the consultation process. (A Evans)<br />
10 Human Resources Comments<br />
10.1 N/A<br />
11 Risk Assessments<br />
11.1 There are non – specific at this stage.<br />
12. IT Implications<br />
12.1 None<br />
13 Property Implications<br />
13.1 The proposals will improve the security of residential properties in the<br />
areas, reducing the opportunity for crime and removing the fear of<br />
crime for residents.<br />
13.2 The improved security of the area will enhance the feeling of well<br />
being and quality of life, positively affecting the liveability aspect of the<br />
community.<br />
14 Procurement Implications<br />
14.1 N/A<br />
15 Environmental and Health & Safety Implications<br />
15.1 There are non – specific at this stage.
16 Community Cohesion Implications [including Crime & Disorder<br />
Implications in accordance with Section 17 of the Act] and<br />
Equalities Implications<br />
16.1 The proposals will improve the security of residential properties in the<br />
areas, reducing the opportunity for crime and removing the fear of<br />
crime for residents.<br />
16.2 The improved security of the area will enhance the feeling of well<br />
being and quality of life, positively affecting the liveability aspect of the<br />
community.<br />
17 Forward Plan Reference<br />
17.1 N/A<br />
18 Key Decision<br />
18.1 No<br />
19 Background Papers<br />
19.1 Report to Cabinet on 21 October 2009 Scrutiny Review: <strong>Alley</strong>gating.<br />
20 Appendices<br />
20.1 Appendix A – <strong>Alley</strong>gate Update document
APPENDIX A<br />
SCHEME<br />
REF ADDRESS WARD STATUS<br />
214 ASWORTH ST/GAIL CL<br />
DATE<br />
COMP<br />
FAILSWORTH<br />
WEST COMPLETED Jun-10<br />
396 11-23 TENBY ROAD HOLLINWOOD COMPLETED Jul-10<br />
523<br />
579<br />
613<br />
18-34 DENSMORE ST & 15-31<br />
PIERCY ST<br />
FAILSWORTH<br />
WEST COMPLETED Sep-10<br />
REPTON AVE, CORONA AVE,<br />
HARROW AVE HOLLINWOOD COMPLETED Aug-10<br />
2-20 LINK LANE & 305-325<br />
HOLLINS RD HOLLINWOOD ORDERED O9/10<br />
621 50-60 MOORCROFT STREET HOLLINWOOD ORDERED O9/10<br />
651 77-84 HAMPTON RD<br />
780 58-66 OLD ROAD<br />
FAILSWORTH<br />
EAST<br />
GATING ORDER<br />
NO.15 (APPLIED<br />
FOR)*<br />
FAILSWORTH<br />
WEST COMPLETED Sep-10<br />
* 651 – <strong>Gating</strong> Order applied for. Currently with OMBC Legal Department<br />
awaiting legal comment.