13.07.2013 Views

Alley Gating Failsworth & Hollinwood PDF 88 KB

Alley Gating Failsworth & Hollinwood PDF 88 KB

Alley Gating Failsworth & Hollinwood PDF 88 KB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ALLEYGATING – FAILSWORTH &<br />

HOLLINWOOD<br />

Report of the Head of Community Safety Services<br />

Portfolio Responsibility: Environment and Infrastructure<br />

05 th November 2010<br />

Officer Contact: Philip Bonworth<br />

Ext. 1592<br />

Purpose of Report<br />

This report has been prepared at the request of local ward councillors, in<br />

response to their highlighting of a location, which they believe would benefit<br />

from alleygating due to quality of life issues, which are seriously affecting<br />

residents living within the intended scheme.<br />

Executive Summary<br />

The Borough of Oldham has a very high proportion of terraced properties and<br />

as a result has a lot of alleyways. These alleyways are utilised as a route of<br />

access for residents to the rear of their properties. Unfortunately alleyways<br />

also provide access for criminals, providing burglars with the means to break<br />

in from the rear of the house. Residents with rears alleyways also often<br />

experience anti-social behaviour, environmental crime and other forms of<br />

criminal activity.<br />

This report will outline problems identified by GMP analysts at this location,<br />

provide an approximate costing of the scheme and outline the process that<br />

will be required if the District Partnership determines that the gating of this<br />

alleyway would be funded through District Partnership monies, subject to<br />

resident approval and a gating order for this location being successfully<br />

obtained.<br />

This report will also provide a further update on those schemes funded by the<br />

District Partnership from their 2009/2010 budgets. This update has been<br />

attached to the report as Appendix A.


Recommendations<br />

For the <strong>Failsworth</strong> & <strong>Hollinwood</strong> District Partnership to consider approval for<br />

funding to install alleygates, in the area identified below: This funding to come<br />

from the Safe, Clean & Green budget allocated to <strong>Failsworth</strong> & <strong>Hollinwood</strong>.<br />

<strong>Failsworth</strong> West Ward (Police Beat Q3 Q5)<br />

There is one scheme listed for <strong>Failsworth</strong> West in the body of this report. This<br />

scheme has not come to the notice of the Community Safety Service for<br />

issues with burglary. However, there have been anecdotal complaints of antisocial<br />

behaviour from residents, both to Ward Councillors and Council<br />

Officers.<br />

Scheme 791 , which encompasses 1-19 Hardman street, <strong>Failsworth</strong> and the<br />

business premise to the rear, offers some problems in terms of gating. The<br />

alleyway is an adopted highway. This issue can potentially be overcome by<br />

the pursuit of a gating order at this location. However, a count of crimes and<br />

Anti-Social Behaviour reports at this location indicates that there has been<br />

only a single report of crime at this location and that there have been no<br />

reports of Anti-Social Behaviour (Information drawn from GMP’s systems for<br />

period 1/11/09-31/10/10). The offence that occurred was however, an<br />

aggravated vehicle taking, where entry to steal the vehicle was gained via the<br />

alley.<br />

There is also an issue of where to install the gate which would be sited<br />

nearest to No.1 Hardman Street. The business premise at the rear of the<br />

properties (which I believe is currently unnoccupied) has fire escape access,<br />

which leads directly into the alleyway, close to the rear of 1 Hardman Street.<br />

Siting of the gate near to the rear of the alleyway, which would be the most<br />

cost effective option,due to the open expanse of land at the side of the<br />

property may not be prudent if the business premise is to brought back into<br />

usage, as it may impact on their fire safety procedures.<br />

The second option would be to site the gate to the rear of 3 Hardman Street,<br />

which would mean that the fire exit was not obstructed in any way. However, it<br />

would mean that No.1 Hardman Street would not be protected by the scheme.<br />

If this solution were to be utilised, the Secure Homes Project would look to<br />

target harden No.1 with additional security measures, such as a perimeter<br />

alarm, improved lighting, locks etc. The cost of the gating scheme would be<br />

approximately £2,500.00.<br />

The third option and the preferred option of the Community Safety Service<br />

would be to site the gate parallel to the front gable of No.1 Hardman Street<br />

and to cover the expanse of land at the side of the property, with a weld mesh<br />

type fencing system. This would mean that the fire exit to the business<br />

premise would be inside the gated scheme, however, the scheme could<br />

employ a sheathed quick release lock to this gate as the gate would be far<br />

enough away from the premise so as not to hinder the egress of employees


from the business in the event of a fire. This scheme would cost<br />

approximately £4,500.00.<br />

The above alleyway is a definitive right of way and therefore the<br />

Community Safety Service would be require to make a legal application<br />

in order to install gates.


Report of the <strong>Failsworth</strong> & <strong>Hollinwood</strong> District Partnership from<br />

Community Safety Services.<br />

Portfolio Responsibility: Environment and infrastructure<br />

1 Purpose of Report<br />

1.1 The neighbourhood alleygating report has now been presented to all<br />

District Partnerships. The <strong>Failsworth</strong> & <strong>Hollinwood</strong> report gave not<br />

only an overview on alleygating, but also gave details of those areas<br />

in <strong>Failsworth</strong> & <strong>Hollinwood</strong> that had been identified as areas suffering<br />

from a range of problems including anti social behaviour and various<br />

other types of sub criminal activity. All these areas had been<br />

identified as areas that would benefit by the installation of alleygates.<br />

1.2 The initial report was prepared as an overview and acted as guidance<br />

so that local partnerships could decide as to whether this was a<br />

suitable tactic to deploy in those areas identified as being problem<br />

areas for local residents.<br />

1.3 This supplementary report has been prepared at the request of ward<br />

Councillors to consider gating at a location identified by Councillors as<br />

having a negative effect on the quality of life of residents within the<br />

intended scheme. Residents have also provided anecdotal accounts<br />

of break-ins to garden sheds and anti-social behaviour at this location,<br />

via phone-calls to the Community Safety Service. This report will also<br />

provide an update on gating schemes funded through the District<br />

Partnership from their 2009/2010 budgets. The update has been<br />

attached to the report as Appendix A.<br />

2 Executive Summary<br />

2.1 The Borough of Oldham has a very high proportion of terraced<br />

properties and as a result also has a lot of alleyways that provide<br />

access for residents to the rear of their properties. Unfortunately<br />

alleyways also provide access for criminals providing burglars with the<br />

means to break in from the rear of the house. Residents with rears<br />

alleyways also often experience ant social behaviour and other forms<br />

of criminal activity.<br />

2.2 This report will outline problems identified by GMP analysts at this<br />

location, provide an approximate costing of the scheme and outline the<br />

process that will be required if the District Partnership determines that<br />

the gating of this alleyway would be funded through District Partnership<br />

monies, subject to resident approval and a gating order for this location<br />

being successfully obtained.<br />

2.3 This report will also provide a further update on those schemes funded<br />

by the District Partnership from their 2009/2010 budgets.


3 Recommendations<br />

REFERENCE STREET<br />

791<br />

HARDMAN<br />

STREET<br />

NO. OF<br />

GATES<br />

REQUIRED<br />

2 + RUN OF<br />

WELD MESH<br />

FENCING<br />

AREAS<br />

COVERED COST<br />

1-19<br />

HARDMAN<br />

STREET &<br />

BUSINESS<br />

PREMISE £4,500.00<br />

<strong>Alley</strong>gate scheme 791, Hardman Street has arisen in response to complaints<br />

from residents of criminal behaviour and anti-social behaviour at these<br />

locations.<br />

I would envision that this scheme would cost no more than £4,500.00, should<br />

the preferred option of the Community Safety Service be pursued.<br />

3.2 The above alleyway is a definitive right of way and would therefore<br />

require a legal application prior to the installation of alleygates<br />

4 Background<br />

4.1 Residents who live in areas with rear alleyways often experience anti<br />

social behaviour; evidence can be found of drug paraphernalia,<br />

alcohol usage, fly tipping, littering, dog fouling and graffiti.<br />

4.2 Community Safety Services and Oldham Partnership has adopted<br />

many tactics to reduce domestic burglary and anti social behaviour.<br />

One of these tactics is to prevent easy access for criminals to the rear<br />

of homes. The installation of lockable gates at the end of each<br />

alleyway makes access to the rear far more difficult whilst providing<br />

peace of mind to the residents.<br />

4.3 Other forms of target hardening or environmental improvements are<br />

available to reduce crime and disorder. Oldham’s Community Safety<br />

Services regularly uses other tactics including improved lighting,<br />

increased security in dwellings (including alarms, locks, security<br />

lighting) and crime prevention education.<br />

4.4 The benefits of alleygating are considerable and range from real<br />

reductions in levels of domestic burglary through to the creation of<br />

defensible space for local residents. Reclaiming the areas at the rear<br />

of their properties enables residents to create safe places for their<br />

children to play and where they can meet their neighbours and develop<br />

a stronger sense of community. It also provides an area that non<br />

residents find difficult to access so providing residents with an element<br />

of control, enabling them to keep the areas clean and providing an


opportunity for them to enhance the area by making appropriate<br />

environmental improvements such as introducing flowers, planters and<br />

benches.<br />

5 Options/Alternatives<br />

5.1 Other options have been investigated and to large extent many of<br />

these options are still utilised as tactics to reduce domestic burglary,<br />

crime and disorder. Target hardening of properties is a common<br />

option and can be focused on individual properties where individual<br />

and specific problems are identified. This as an option will continue<br />

but alleygating of back alleyways can be more cost effective and has<br />

numerous additional benefits as outlined previously. The average<br />

cost of target hardening a home in Oldham is £180 where the average<br />

cost to securing a home by alleygating is £120.<br />

6 Preferred Option<br />

6.1 The preferred option is for the <strong>Failsworth</strong> & <strong>Hollinwood</strong> District<br />

Partnership to continue with the gating of problem alleyways in<br />

<strong>Failsworth</strong> & <strong>Hollinwood</strong>. To continue this initiative is to continue with<br />

the valuable work already carried out by Community Safety Services<br />

in reducing crime and anti social behaviour in the Royton & Shaw<br />

neighbourhood.<br />

7 Consultation<br />

Resident Consultation<br />

7.1 Ideally, successful alleygating schemes require the support and<br />

consent of all residents who live along the alley to be gated and as<br />

such are directly affected by the closure of the alley. Transitory<br />

resident’s views will be considered in the same way as those of a<br />

permanent resident. Under normal circumstances, consultation does<br />

not take place directly with landlords or Registered Social Landlords,<br />

unless the property is empty or void.<br />

7.2 Initially, letters are sent to all those parties above, detailing the<br />

proposal to gate the alleyway, outlining the advantages and any<br />

possible disadvantages. The letter will be accompanied by a leaflet<br />

and voting form. The completion and return of the form and its<br />

contents will show the initial level of support from local residents.<br />

8 Financial Implications<br />

9 Legal Services Comments<br />

9.1 <strong>Gating</strong> orders are one of the legal methods of restricting access along<br />

a highway. They are made under powers inserted into the Highways<br />

Act 1980 by the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005.


Before making a gating order, the Council must be satisfied that<br />

premises adjoining or adjacent to the highway subject to the order are<br />

affected by crime or anti social behaviour, the existence of the<br />

highway is facilitating the persistent commission of criminal offences<br />

or anti social behaviour and it is in all the circumstances expedient to<br />

make the order for the purposes of reducing crime or anti social<br />

behaviour. In considering whether it is expedient to make the order,<br />

the Council should have regard to the likely effect of making the order<br />

on the occupiers of premises adjoining or adjacent to the highway, the<br />

likely effect of making the order on other persons in the locality and in<br />

a case where the highway constitutes a through route, the availability<br />

of a reasonably convenient alternative route.<br />

9.2 It is not necessary to make a gating order in respect of a private<br />

access which is not a highway, although there may be issues<br />

concerning the restriction of private rights of access. These issues<br />

should be addressed during the consultation process. (A Evans)<br />

10 Human Resources Comments<br />

10.1 N/A<br />

11 Risk Assessments<br />

11.1 There are non – specific at this stage.<br />

12. IT Implications<br />

12.1 None<br />

13 Property Implications<br />

13.1 The proposals will improve the security of residential properties in the<br />

areas, reducing the opportunity for crime and removing the fear of<br />

crime for residents.<br />

13.2 The improved security of the area will enhance the feeling of well<br />

being and quality of life, positively affecting the liveability aspect of the<br />

community.<br />

14 Procurement Implications<br />

14.1 N/A<br />

15 Environmental and Health & Safety Implications<br />

15.1 There are non – specific at this stage.


16 Community Cohesion Implications [including Crime & Disorder<br />

Implications in accordance with Section 17 of the Act] and<br />

Equalities Implications<br />

16.1 The proposals will improve the security of residential properties in the<br />

areas, reducing the opportunity for crime and removing the fear of<br />

crime for residents.<br />

16.2 The improved security of the area will enhance the feeling of well<br />

being and quality of life, positively affecting the liveability aspect of the<br />

community.<br />

17 Forward Plan Reference<br />

17.1 N/A<br />

18 Key Decision<br />

18.1 No<br />

19 Background Papers<br />

19.1 Report to Cabinet on 21 October 2009 Scrutiny Review: <strong>Alley</strong>gating.<br />

20 Appendices<br />

20.1 Appendix A – <strong>Alley</strong>gate Update document


APPENDIX A<br />

SCHEME<br />

REF ADDRESS WARD STATUS<br />

214 ASWORTH ST/GAIL CL<br />

DATE<br />

COMP<br />

FAILSWORTH<br />

WEST COMPLETED Jun-10<br />

396 11-23 TENBY ROAD HOLLINWOOD COMPLETED Jul-10<br />

523<br />

579<br />

613<br />

18-34 DENSMORE ST & 15-31<br />

PIERCY ST<br />

FAILSWORTH<br />

WEST COMPLETED Sep-10<br />

REPTON AVE, CORONA AVE,<br />

HARROW AVE HOLLINWOOD COMPLETED Aug-10<br />

2-20 LINK LANE & 305-325<br />

HOLLINS RD HOLLINWOOD ORDERED O9/10<br />

621 50-60 MOORCROFT STREET HOLLINWOOD ORDERED O9/10<br />

651 77-84 HAMPTON RD<br />

780 58-66 OLD ROAD<br />

FAILSWORTH<br />

EAST<br />

GATING ORDER<br />

NO.15 (APPLIED<br />

FOR)*<br />

FAILSWORTH<br />

WEST COMPLETED Sep-10<br />

* 651 – <strong>Gating</strong> Order applied for. Currently with OMBC Legal Department<br />

awaiting legal comment.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!