The Effect of Globalisation on Nation State: Extending the Nation ...
The Effect of Globalisation on Nation State: Extending the Nation ...
The Effect of Globalisation on Nation State: Extending the Nation ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Hence, Wallerstein has emphasised <strong>the</strong> importance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> centre-periphery relati<strong>on</strong>s,<br />
(Wallerstein, 2006:28).<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> new political system had to have a str<strong>on</strong>g military power in order to sustain<br />
an ec<strong>on</strong>omical producti<strong>on</strong> and marketing in a secure envir<strong>on</strong>ment. It was a necessity<br />
that all <strong>the</strong> producti<strong>on</strong> process –raw material, manufacturing and marketing- needed a<br />
secure envir<strong>on</strong>ment. This political system must be designed in parallel with <strong>the</strong> interest<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> bourgeoisie. Political systems that based kinship and feudalism and also based <strong>on</strong><br />
religi<strong>on</strong> was something that bourgeoisie never wanted. Because<strong>the</strong> church and <strong>the</strong><br />
feudal structure hampered <strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omic development and <strong>the</strong> interest <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> newly<br />
emerged bourgeoisie. Thus, demolishing and reducing <strong>the</strong> effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> those traditi<strong>on</strong>al<br />
political regimes suited interest <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> bourgeoisie. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>re was a vital need for a new<br />
political system to substitute <strong>the</strong> traditi<strong>on</strong>al and religious <strong>on</strong>e. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> system or model that<br />
bourgeoisie would be effective and determiner <strong>on</strong> its source <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> legality, structure and<br />
functi<strong>on</strong>ing was <strong>the</strong> Nati<strong>on</strong> <strong>State</strong>.<br />
Capitalist ec<strong>on</strong>omic system has been a determining factor in <strong>the</strong> emergence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
nati<strong>on</strong> state. In <strong>the</strong> United <strong>State</strong>s, England and Scandinavian countries <strong>the</strong> process has<br />
been gradual and smooth. Whereas, in <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tinent bourgeoisie gained ec<strong>on</strong>omic and<br />
political power through revoluti<strong>on</strong>s and harsh changes. This difference between <strong>the</strong> two<br />
has caused <strong>the</strong> emergence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> different kind <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong> states. Nati<strong>on</strong> states have emerged<br />
in a wide range from c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al m<strong>on</strong>archies to republican and federal <strong>on</strong>es. As far as<br />
<strong>the</strong> interest <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> bourgeoisie was c<strong>on</strong>cerned <strong>the</strong> different designati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong> sates was<br />
<strong>on</strong>ly symbolic. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>y carried more or less <strong>the</strong> same features in ec<strong>on</strong>omic matters and in<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir capitalist and imperialist behaviour. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore, even <strong>the</strong> federal structures were not<br />
historically against nati<strong>on</strong> state. C<strong>on</strong>trarily, it was a subcategory <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong> state<br />
(Akbulut. 2011:34).<br />
1.<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> C<strong>on</strong>cepts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Globalizati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>State</strong>, Sovereignty and Nati<strong>on</strong> <strong>State</strong><br />
In social sciences c<strong>on</strong>cepts, instituti<strong>on</strong>s and processes are closely interrelated<br />
with each o<strong>the</strong>r. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Globalisati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> process has deeply affected <strong>the</strong> sovereignty and <strong>the</strong><br />
functi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> state and especially nati<strong>on</strong> state. Defining those c<strong>on</strong>cepts will probably serve<br />
to this study to understand <strong>the</strong> effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> globalisati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> nati<strong>on</strong> state.<br />
1088