(Second Year) - NCRTM

Project Staff 

VOLUME II 

INTERIM REPORT 

THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION 

of 

THE ATLANTA EMPLOYMENT EVALUATION AND SERVICE CENTER 

June 19 7 0 

to Evaluate 

Designed 

No RD-2988-G 

Project 

(Second Year) 

L Vlnson, Director 

Vernon 

Employment Evaluation and Serwce Center 

Atlanta 

D Brown, Project Director 

Donme 

Employment Evaluation and Serwce Center 

Atlanta 

Wzlham M Holbert, Ph D Research Consultant 

1ohn R Ray, Ed D Research Consultant

NOTE 

Volume II contains a complete set of tables for the 1970 report wth a 

discussion of these data Volume I contains an analyss and dscusson 

of the data wth selected references to these data, The frst volume s of 

primary use by practoners and lay public, while Volume II will be of more 

nterest to persons more research omented

Introduction 

Results and Discussion of Data Collected 

July 1, 1969 June 30, 1970 

Basic data for the systematic evaluation of the client population is gathered 

by AEESC personnel and processed at The University of Tennessee Computer 

Center. A set of eight basic data forms provides input for machine processlng. 

It should be noted that not all clients have information recorded on all forms 

It is also of importance to note that it may not be possible for all items to be 

completed on any single form A llst of data elements and a set of data collection 

forms are found in Appendix A of this report 

The two points noted in the precedlng paragraph are important when total 

entries in tables appearing in this report are compared. It may be that the data 

on the sex of clients produces a total population count which is not the same as 

the total population count produced on Family Monthly Income at Closure The 

reason for this is that data on Sex come from the Personal Data Sheet (Form i) 

while data for Family Monthly Income at Closure come from the Counsehng Data 

Sheet (Form 2). A final note on data collection is that forms are filed at specific 

periods in the client's program. Therefore, certain forms on a specific client 

may be in the system weeks before additional forms are filed on that same client. 

Analysis of Data 

Analyses of the data collected by the AEESC over the past two years is 

presented in three categories in this report. The initial set of analyses deal

-2- 

with clients who are "Closed Referred." The second set of data analyses deal 

with clients categorized as 

"Employed, 

" "Unemployable and Closed Other." 

(See Data Sheet 2, ©uestlon 25 for a breakdown of the "Closed Other" category.) 

The third set of analyses deal with a 

study of differences among population sub- 

categorleso These different analyses are in terms of ChrSquare analyses of 

Student's t-tests. The frst type to be used is the non-parametric test using 

data classified as nominal or ordinal These tests are generally applied where 

data is of a categorical or frequency count nature The second type test is used 

for data classified as interval or used when a comparison of mean score is desired. 

Demographlc Des cnptlon 

Cerzaln demographic characzerlszlcs emerge when zhe AEESC cilenzs are 

categorized as Employed, Unemployable, and Closed Other. For example, the 

largest number of persons served in each of the three categorles are 16-20 years 

of age, female, Negro, and single. The Employed persons, while predominantly 

Negro, are distributed almost equally on sex (47.88% male and 52.12% female) 

The three categorizations of clients are likely to have between 9 and 12 years 

of education and to have one (I) dependent Approximately 50 percent of each 

group is a Head of Household 

The clients in each category are likely to have an income at acceptance of 

0-50 dollars but to not be receiving public assistance The majority of Employed 

clients had been unemployed 16 weeks or less, with the clients classed as 

Unemployable and Closed Other likely to be out of work a longer period of time. 

Approximately 45% of each of these latter two groups have been out of work 53 

weeks or more when accepted. The client in each category is likely to be

unskilled, to not have a criminal record and to have received a guarded rating 

from the caseworker. 

illegitimate children 

The Employed client has fewer disabilities and fewer 

The Employed client has a 

higher family income at 

closure and is more likely to not need public assistance at closure. 

Clients Closed Referred 

When the Center was originated, a system of Closed Referrals was 

established to indicate that a client did not enter the Center for evaluation. In 

many cases only a paper eferral by the referral agent had been received by the 

Center staff. After numerous efforts by the caseworker, referring agent, and 

utility clerk, the case would be put in the Closed Referred status if the client 

was not motivated to enter the program. 

In the early phase of the Center operation, there were certain referral 

requirements which tended to reduce the referral agent's participation in this 

program As of July I, 1969, practically all barriers for referral were removed 

The referral agents were instructed to make any type of referral that would best 

serve the client and be convenient to the referring staff. Walk-in clients were 

encouraged The emphasis now is on immediate dehvery of service to clients 

referred or requesting evaluation, tralmng, and/or employment 

This new procedure, in many cases, has been traumatic to the staff of 

the Center, especially during the early stages. Many clients referred are 

found to be inappropriate referrals in the strict professional sense, however, 

the Center staff is assuming the job of screening of these individuals.

One of the first objectives of the research for this Center was to determine 

the demographlc description of clients that were being Closed Referred at this 

Center. It is felt by the Research Consultants and the Center Administrative 

Staff that enough data on Closed Referred cases had been secured to fulfill this 

objective. The item of Closed Referred cases will not be referenced in subsequent 

reports. 

Chents at the Atlanta Employment Evaluation and Service Center are placed 

in a Closed Referred status for sbx reasons. These are (I) not financially able, 

(2) moved from defined service area, (3) did not comply with routine, (4) did not 

appear to benefit from services, (5) family problem, and (6) employed. Data in 

the following tables is according to Age, Race, Marital Status, Sex, Education, 

Head of Household, Number of Dependents, Income at Acceptance, Length of 

Unemployment, Level of Employment, Criminal Record, and Vocational Potential 

as seen by the Social Caseworker. 

Data in tabular form on Closed Referred clients are presented in this report 

and indicate that the largest group of clients (538) were closed due to non- 

comphance with routines. It is also apparent that the largest group of these 

clients cluster in the younger age categories. Additionally, these data show 

that the closure reason of Employed is the second largest category with Family 

Problems a distant third. When Closed Referred clients are categorized by 

race, it is apparent that the group is largely Negro and that the category of 

Did Not Comply with Routines is the largest reason for closure (53.11%). 

Employed is the second largest category of closure when clients are categorized 

by race. Data indicate that the largest number of clients are single, with

-5- 

approxlmate!y the same number married and separated. A sex breakdown of 

these clients indicates that the bulk of the population is female The Family 

Problem categorization shows the largest percentage difference figure between 

female and male clients. Of persons with family problems, 89 61% were female. 

The majority of the clients closed referred have between 9 and 12 years of 

education. However, various closure categories show number of clients in 

excess of 20% with 5 to 8 years of education. Data indicate that the majority 

of the clients in the closed referred category are Head of Household These 

data show that of those clients closed Not Financially Able, Not Complying with 

Routines, Not Benefiting from Services, Having Family Problems, and Being 

Employed, the majority were Heads of Household These clients generally have 

two or fewer dependents with the majority of these having no dependents. These 

data show that the bulk of Closed Referred clients had $50 or less in Income at 

Acceptance, with more than 50% of those clients closed for non-comphance 

reporting zero income The largest incomes at acceptance were shown by those 

clients Closed Employed 

Length of unemployment data show that the majority of clients were without 

work for 53 weeks or longer and that a large percentage had been out of work for 

27 weeks or longer The Level of Employment of these clients was generally 

Unskilled Service, Unskilled, Home Domestic, or Other (Undetermined) Few 

are categorized as Skillful or Seml-skilled 

When the clients are categorized according to Social Worker's Vocational 

Potentlal, it can be observed that the guarded rating was given to the most clients

-6- 

with poor a close second. Of those clients closed as Employed, 86% received 

a rating of excellent or guarded. This combination was higher than for any 

other closure reason. Those closed for non-comphance with routines represented 

the group with the most poor ratings when they are expressed as a total or as a 

percentage for that category. 

Employed, Unemployable, and Closed Other Categorizations 

When AEESC clients are cateqonzed as "Employed," "Unemployable," 

and "Closed Other" and distributed according to age, it is apparent that the 

largest number of employed persons fall into the younger age ranges, especially 

the categories of 16 to 20 and 21 to 25. It is evident that there are few clients 

at the Center over 50 years of age. For example, in "Employed" clients, 2.56% 

of the population was over 50, and "Unemployable" clients showed a little less 

than 8% over 50 and in the "Closed Other" category, a little less than 4% were 

classed as 50 years of age or older. 

rhen AEESC clients are categorized according to race, the predominant 

number of clients closed as 

"Employed" are Negro with 83.46% of the population 

falling in this category. Of those clients "Unemployable," 136 or 75.98% were 

Negro and of the clientele "Closed Other," 81.28% were Negro. It is apparent 

that the Center serves a larger proportion of Negro than white clients, but that 

relat_vely the same percentages in each category of "Employed," "Unemployable," 

and "Closed Other" are being handled by the Center. The data show that a 

slightly higher proportion of Negro persons are "Employed" or "Closed Other" 

than are closed as "Unemployable."

-7- 

The largest number of clients served by the Center are single with approximately 

50% of the number in each category being married. The next largest percentage 

is that of separated, representing approximately 16% in each category. Of 

"Employed" clients, 47.88% are males while 52.12% are females. Of the 

"Unemployable" clients, 58.89% are females and 41.11% are males. The "Closed 

Other" category indicates that 60.93% are female and 39.07% are male. 

The education categorization of AEESC clients indicates that the majority of 

clients served in each category have between 9 and 12 years of education. The 

second largest categorization is 5 to 8 years of education. 

When AEESC chents are categorized according to their distribution as head 

of household, 50.46% of the clients who were "Employed" were head of household, 

while 47.16% of the "Unemployable" were heads of households and 53.01% of the 

"Closed Other" were head of household. Of clients "Employed," 51.08% reported 

one dependent. Of clients "Unemployable," 57.23% reported one dependent and 

of clients "Closed Other," 49.66% reported one dependent. Few clients have more 

than 5 dependents. 

9/hen clients were categorized according to income at acceptance, more than 

50% of the clients "Employed" had between 0 and $50 at acceptance, 37.08% of 

the clients "Unemployable" had incomes between 0 and $50 and 47.00% of 

clients "Closed Other" had incomes between 0 and $50. 

On the question of whether or not clients were receiving public assistance 

at referral, 23.23% of the clients closed as "Employed" were recexvlng public 

assistance at referral and 26.92% of the clients "Closed Other" were receiving 

asslstance at referral.

-8- 

When the predominant level of employment or last level maintained is 

used as a categorization factor for clients "Employed," "Unemployable," and 

"Closed Other," it may be noted that 4.00% of the "Employed" had a previous 

record of employment as skilled worker. Of the "Unemployable," 3.98% had 

the same and 2.53% of the "Closed Other" had a record as skilled worker. Of 

the clients "Employed, " 33.71% had a previous work skill level of "unskilled 

service other than household" while 44.89% of the "Unemployable" and 41.98% 

of the "Closed Other" fell in this category. The unskilled industrial or 

construction category represented 16.57% of the clients "Employed" and 12.50% 

of the "Unemployable" and 12.66% of the clients "Closed Other." Home domestic 

accounted for 13.33% of the "Employed" clients, while 9.09% of these clients 

"Unemployable" had held a previous job as a home domestic. Of the clients 

"Closed Other," ii. 60% had a previous record of employment in this category. 

When the vocational potential given by the social worker's critical rating 

for "Employed" clients was tallied, 37.43% were given an excellent rating. Of 

clients closed "Unemployable," 5.65% were given an excellent rating while 

21.41% of clients "Closed Other" were given an excellent rating by the social 

worker. Of clients closed "Unemployable," 71.19% received a guarded recom- 

mendatlon and 23.16% received a poor recommendation. Of clients closed 

"Employed, 6.43% received a poor ranking while 15.18% of clients "Closed 

Other" received this vocational potential rating from social workers. 

In the receiving public assistance at closure categomzatlon for cllents, it 

should be noted that 73.36% of the clients closed "Employed" were receiving 

no assistance at closure, while 53.61% of the clients closed "Unemployable"

-9- 

were receiving no assistance and 56.22% of the clients "Closed Other" were 

receiving no public assistance. The largest single category of public assist- 

ance at closure is AFDC with 9.38% of the clients "Employed" receiving this 

assistance; 8.57% of the clients "Unemployable" receiving this assistance, 

and 12.12% of the clients "Closed Other" receiving this type of assistance. 

Wnen the training potential categorization of clients "Employed, 

"Unemployable," and "Closed Other" was made, it could be observed that 

53.30% of the clients closed "Unemployable" were not recommended for training 

because of no training objective. The clients closed "Employed" were largely 

categorized as 

"training and related placement achieved," while 10.92% were 

potential for training marked "other." Of clients "Closed Other," 31.46% were 

not recommended because of "no training objective" and 32.16% had a potential 

for training categorization of "other." 

W"nen the clients are categorized as to type of training program, it can be 

observed that those clients classed as "Employed" have the largest number of 

opportunities in the industrial trades with 40.81% of their number being placed 

jobs of this type. Of the clients closed "Unemployable," 10.20% were in 

this training program and 21.78% of the clients "Closed Other" were also in 

this training program. Clerical, service trades, sewing, and the category 

other account for large percentages of the "Employed" clients whlle other and 

the service trades mark large categorization points for chents "Unemployable." 

For clients "Closed Other," the category of training program noted as other and 

the category of clerical are the largest two categorization points

TralnJng faclhty categor,_zatlon shows that 36.01% of the cllents closed 

"Employed" were involved n he MOT/, tr-D:ng program w:th 28.00% o{ the 

clients "Closed Othe' al,o involved n t.s program. Only 0.62% of those 

clients classed "Unemployable" vere involved n this training facility Of 

the clients classed "Unemployable," 62 ._1% dd not ente, a training program 

and 38.95% of the clients "Closed Other" dd not enter a training program. 

Of those clients "Employed," 24.96% did not enter training at the Atlanta 

center. EOA-sponsored training activities accounted for 16.93% of those chents 

closed "Employed, for 28.57% of those clients "Unemployable, and 15.37% 

of those chents "Closed Other." 

With regard to those persons referre to work potential, it is observed that 

47.50% of the chents closed "Employed" did not partlclpate n Work Potential 

referral, 63.82% of the chents closed "Unemployable" did not participate in 

the Work Potential evaluation and 61.78% of those clients "Closed Other" did 

not partlcpate in the Work Potential Of those clients "Employed" participating 

in some kind of Work Potential referral, 21.67% received brief evaluation 

conslstng of a statement only, whle 27.33% received a full evaluation. Compa- 

table totals for clients "Unemployable" were 9.55 and 20.60 and for clients 

"Closed Other" were 9.77 and 11.17%. 

When the chents categorized as "Employed," "Unemployable," and "Closed 

Other" are cross-referenced as to VR referral, t may be observed that 25.25% 

of those closed "Employed" were referred outside VR. Of the clients closed 

"Unemployable," 34.85% came from outside VR and 21.97% of the clients "Closed 

Other" came from outside VR. Other large categorizations for clients closed

-ii- 

"Employed" include 2 6.09% referred to Center VR accepted for services and 

17.73% who were referred to Center VR and not accepted. For clients classed 

"Unemployable," 34.85% were referred by other or non-apphcable sources, 

23.55% of those "Closed Other" came from other or non-apphcable sources. 

Of clients "Closed Other," 25.83% were referred to Center VR and not accepted. 

When a categomzaton of clients was made based on counselor's recom- 

mendation at staffing, it was found that 64% of the clients closed "Employed" 

were recommended for training while only 30% of the clients closed "Unemploy- 

able" were recommended for training. For clients considered as "Unemployable, 

66% were recommended for training. For clients considered as "Unemployable," 

the counselor's recommendation at 

stafflng indicated that 21.21% of these people 

were considered "Unemployable" at the time of staffing Of clients classed 

"Employable," 17.89% were recommended for immediate employment and 5.56% 

of the clients classed "Unemployable" were recommended for immediate employ- 

ment. 

Mean Scores on Selected Variables by E: U O 

Mean scores for selected variables gathered for AEESC clients are shown 

Table A. These data show that the mean number of dependents for Employed 

chents is 2.66, for Unemployable clients, 2.31, and for Closed Other clients, 

2.44. The average income at acceptance for these three groups is $144.26, 

$138.57, and $139.10 respectively. 

The mean IQ score for the Employed group was 88.41, mean Gates Reading 

Level at 6.09 and mean Arlthmetc level at 5.64 Comparable scores for the

0 

o 

o0 

o 

o 

z 

I-rl

uz oouoaollzp upouuDzs o%opu sosAlU oanbs-zqO oR% io sInsoa oq£ 

"81qe$ Aue Io sSsulnIssn 8q $ousss= (0) o=sz $o ssuu8 seq$ ps$ou 8q 

plnoqs I "I nsS= oseq 8q =8le ou pp sSSAleUe 8sq "ss=u8 S ueq .,8.8t 

8Aeq o Hoo ou buzolI e psnduoo 8=8m osi ss=enbs-zqO "qus sg=esu 8q o 

pspunoa 9.e ssnleA 8=enbs-qO 8q "sun e e ed ps=du, oo 9.9m Asq usq 

solqeaeA osoq uoo,oq posxo soouo=oIp ,ueoiuSs =oq,oq ouu=ohop o 

opeua o=om sOSXleUe osoqZ "IoAox lUOeonp[ pue 'xos sneers leuIAl 

ob,¢ Io stno uz pouosod sz sosAIeU oenbs-zqO Io umopHoq TZTUZ oq.I. 

S91'1 

80E'I 

sso., olenb S qO bUsfl so§Aluv oouo,xelICI 

eoaeS uetuAoldtn3 oeS 

6#L (uetuu=eaoo TeOOI pu eheS) Aouebv o=ITO/V[ ouqnd 

:seo=nos peuaeu uejo som =nol eq uo=I sIemete= moqs moIeq p eq;I, 

"sH eem PS" s dnoB IehO% eq =o; oBe=oA 

"19" eqo pesoIo ol pue '01" sueqo elqXoldtueufl oI 'I6" sm 

suelo poAoldtn3 =ol uo)enleAe u sHeem Io =oqtunu ueetu eq.z sHeem 6S" 0 

se dnoab leO oq o I ebeAe eq.I. "6" 08 se ueetu eq sueIo etNO posolo 

o I pue 'Ep" Z sere uetu Oqh suoIo elqeAoldtuouIl =oI 'II" 6Z sere sueTlO 

peAoldu o= emSOlO oh uossu, pe uao.u sHeem ;o zequnu ueeu eq, ,q ,sezehu 

TeUO:]:ppe o st hi "seTqeueA ese uo 68" P pue 6E" S ZI" 98 ;o seaoos 

p., =eqo pesolo sueIO "9P" lz pue LL" l 'TT" lz8 e=em dno=b eTqpoTdtuouo_ 

-ZI-

uougsuo e se pgsn s OuugeS e uo$gpugtutuoogH s,solgsunoo uq/A 

tuo=l eogId eq u eoues8ll$p ueouubs s OSle e=eq.T. "tug,bo=d OS.q.qkr 8q u 

sugdoaed o=Dehl pug eqa ueemeq punol s e=enbs-qO o enie ugouus 

uozuoeo oseq sq =o I 

uooes-sso=o e uese=de= pesn selqeuea eq.I "e=eme egp o sedX umolIoI 

eq 'suaio OS.q.qZr o suoezuoSaeo =eLNo snoIA tuoI.J sinse= LNza pe=gdLuoo 

pue eIqgug uoezuoego osgq g sg pesn s eoe ,sueqo eq ueeIA& 

sesAIgUf eoe1 

eouepuuoo Io IeAeI S'O eq e ueouubs s: 

uoeonpH pue xe S =o I e=enbs-qO lo enieA eq.I. "eenbs-qO =oI enIeA 

ADuouubs seonpo=d OSle uogzuobeeo uoeonp.w "sA sneers IgUglAI 

eq.T. "OS..wr eeN ueqo eleme I eq pue UelO OS..qkr eletu eq u eoue=ellp 

ugouzubzs e s e=eq eq smoqs uoz,gousseIo xes "sA sn,gS IeUeIAI 

SUO:gzlObe:gO snolleA 8q: io I gX io I senlea ue=ei/p XlUeOUUbS 

lo uoendeuoo eq u peinse= uoeonp.q pue eoell pue 'xes pue eOell ' sn,e, S 

pug eoeH ueemeq suosugdtuoo o: eA$ele= g:gCI "umoqs s$ osIg leAeX 

IgUOeonp.q pue eb%/ueemeq eoue=e/lp ueouubzs %r "ebb/Aq pezuobeeo e=e 

.4eq ueqm sueqo OS33V Io xes eq u sxe seoue=et;p uouus "sueIO 

o.SeN pue eqm ueemeq sngs IgUgu, u ssxe eoue;e;;p .ugouuOs g

eeqs p ioeso eq mo.u uzmoo uzI IozuO s,-eio/w Ioos ueq/v 

pouad aaOuo I ZlUeOiuOs e =o; paXoldLuaun aae suaqo oOaN aLN eLN saeopu 

uotaetao e se pesn st uemAoldmoufl o q3ux eq ueq2Vl -omt Ieee= e ooue 

-stsse otlqnd ut uotedtotted =toq o oAtelOa suotlo o=BohI pue suotlO otq 

uouetao e se pesn st [eetoI e eouestssxr otlqn d ueqAt "IetueocI 

moat stsou3oacI uotetltqeqoI uc suoilo o3oN ..to pue suotlO otqt =ot onleA 

eaenbs-tqo uoaetp ADueotiulSts e si o=eq eq puno st t 'eoe= qtm elqeueA 

ostaedmoo e se pesn s [XNIO.I. too=; stsou8o;cI uoIetitqeqI eq uevl 

pondmoo osle s[ enle-,x ueoIiIu612-uou e 'ooe= qm elqei=eA uolezuofioeo 

se pesn st uotenleAO IetueocI [=oivl eq uo punot A=ofiseo Ietueod et uug[ 

peandmoo st onlea eaenb$-tqo aueoiluOts-uou aeqa puno st 1t 'ooea qlm elqeuea 

uoteztaoOeeo e se posn sI uemsnfp%r [=o.tvl moj ssou8ocI uotqtqeqeN 

oqa uoq,x 'aOAOmOtt "luooIIuOts at oiquea eaenbs-tqO eql 1ql punot OSle 

st t 'ooea qtm pozuo3oeo pue elqeueA 3utmtlo p e se posn st e=nsolO e 

=ouestss otlqnc I ueuh "suoIIo oafiehI pue sueIO eqm ueomeq peuueep 

st onleA eaenbs-tqo ueoIuf3s eq punot sere t 'ooe qtm pe=edmoo pue 

eTqeueA uoueuo e se posn st ensoIo e uemXoTdma o ToAex eq ueqA 

pendmoo s 

efi=eqostp e uotenTeAO Io sTnse= ueq "puno OSTe st o-rb3-tqO o enTA

u eoue=eilp ueouubs e sere e=eq eq punol sere 'elqeueA uoezuobeeo 

e se pesn sere ueusn[pv I=oA uo ssoubo=d uoe%IqeqeH ueuflVl 

"OS.q.V e sueqo elemel 

pue suel o eletu =oI ue=elip Aiueouubs sere eansolo e eousssir olqncl 

eq pue 'UeLUOm pue UeU 01 .ueaell p Ap.ueouubs sere e=nsoIo e ueLuAoIdua. 

Io leAe'l eel eq 'eaenbs-qO Io enIeA ue=ellp Ap.ueouubs uebe sere e=eq 

eq punol sere 'xes suee pezuobeeo sere e=nsolo oI uoseeH etN ueq/A 

"OS.q.qir etN s:UelO UetUOA pue 

ueu ueemeq ebaeqosp :e uoD.enieAe io inse= ur pue 'uenom pue ueu; ueemeq 

5uules e uoepueuJuaooe s,aOleSUnOO eq u 'UeLUO pue ueLu ueetaeq eo=nos 

leaaelell HA eq u seoueellp ueoumbs e=em e=eq.I. -ueuom pue uen buoue 

buue=& =oI Ieueod etl u eoue=ellp ueouubs e sere eeq eq peum=eep 

sere 'sesAIeue snoAe=d eq u se seIqeueA Ie=eAes qm peaeduoo sInse= 

eseq pug xes o$ bup=oooe pezuoDeseo e=em sSueio OS..q/eq$ ueA 

sesXTeU/xes 

peuuaaeep sz OSle eaenbE 

-qO ueaelP ,41ueoI[uDs e 'eoe qm uoezuobeeo-sso=o e o peoe[qns 

s ssouboad IeopeIAI eq ueq/Vl "sueIo oaBeN pue sueIO eqm j[o srsoubo=d 

leUO$eOOA eq$ u oouoaei7 p SueouuBs e s oaeq$ Seq$ 'eSep snoAead q$/w se 

'bueopu peuuaaep s e=enbs-qO io enleA uaellp ADueouubs e 'eoe= 

suebe pozao6eeo s :aeqs e:ep AoloqoAsd eq tuoa I ssouDo=cl leUOOOA 

eq ueatA =ood pue 'pepaenb 'uelieOXe io suue u XIqe sq lo bue= 

Iemuo aeq o, eaeiea uoqo eqa oq pue ueIO oabohI eq mea saegom 

Imos eq Aem eq u eoue=atp e s e=eq q seeopu sq "pendu, oo s 

-SI-

9 dno6 aq o S'9 o dno6 aA 0 o 9I aq o; S'S moa/ fSuSuE seoos 

SLI q 9q aaeq =aAo pue 9 suaqo atI1 'suossnosp sno[A=d q u 

"Iz pu Z "sA 8 pu : pu ' 'Z 'I "sa /. 

'lz pu ' 'Z 'I "sA 9 'Z "sA I uozuobeo e u sueuo ueeeq punoi 

seoos uem OI uo seoue=eltp ueouubs eq aoqs senieA se- uepns 

"9" Sl o 6"0I mo.u ebue suoAep 

ppus "eJS ;o s;eA 0 g pu 91 ueemeq sueqs eq op uq 0I eqDq eAq 

dn pue seeX Ig tuol abe lo seuobee eAU eq u sueqo eq Seorpm osI 

nq 'e=oos 01 ueem seqbq eq eAeq S%UeIO =8AO pue 9 eq q 

sUeTO OS3.qV to 90 uo pesq sesATeUe oueetlp lo sTnse eq uo 

sse.l,- Shsfl sesxIUV eou9ell(I 

AIUOUubs 8lip o puno; sa ssouboI IopeIAI eq.l. "nTa 

uouufis-uou 8onpo=d o punoi seza uooss AoloqoAsd 8q moa/ ssoufio=d 

HA eq nq UeLUOa pue u8m ueeaeq Due= ue=eIt p AIueouus eonpo=d 

o punot se eeqs ep [oeseo eq tool t bu}I IoO s,e[o/v Ioos 

xes uo pesq pezobeeo sa uooes IO.I, mol ssoubod uoIqq8 eq 

osle sere I "enbs-qO lo enIeA uee//p Aiuouubs ou s eeq: 

q punol sm 'pezuobeo sm sedA ueIo o eq 9o Ieueod 8q usq 

'OAOOH "UOtlO oimo oq o pu ,uozto oitu oq o, USAfi sIsoufiold OL D 

-9I-

pu 8S'S sx SelU ao eaoos leAel oxeuqu eq.T. "leAe I SO" eq uouSs 

s, SeleU; pue SleU uem,q 89"- 7o nleA q.T. "61z'S s SeleUe; o pue 

$ eq& "seizure7 o7 89"8 pu 8'88 s seIua o eos ueua OI $eq eq& 

$ eq E6"lz o ssuezI oalSehI JoT pu I'S 7o sSuezio eSzttm Jo7 eJoos uetu 

oqs seJoos IoAot ozsetuqsuV "IoAoI SO" $ uozTzulSzs s /.'l,- 7o eniA $ f 

"ZI sm seoJehI JoT pu 0'9 sm ssueIo eqm JoT eJoos uetu smoqs 

eoea to uo$oun t e se Sse& SupeeI seseD etI1 7o s$inseJ otis uo eSe(I "IoAoI 

90" otis $ uo/ubs s S$'S- to enIA oR& "80"EI o UO$Aep papu$S 

e pue 0"$8 70 ueetu e toqs ssueIO oaeh[ JoT seaoos upuodseaaoo "ZE'II 

7o UOag,aep papugls g qm 9/.'68 70 eaoos 0I ugetu eaq s$ueio etl/vl 

eae seuoBeo Jeqo oN "8 pu '/ '9 'S sA AaoBeo pu :8 pu '/. '9 'S 

Z suo$gzaoBelgo oBg '8 pu '/. 9 SA I suoagzuoBelgo eBg ao I punoi 

/iItuaoTun e eaeq seuoBeaga aeBunoA etI aqa moqs IoAo I oaetuttlug uo $efI 

seaoos $se$-$ $uo[/utSs ou poonpoad 8 pu '/. '9 '9 '1 suo$gzuot5 

-eSeo eBf "p q$m dnoJ5 eSe Jo I puno/ sere enieA $ $ueoiuDs f " "sA Z 

sseIo seop sea to senIeA lueotulSs eonpoad 9 pue 'g 'g "SA I SSIO elSXf 

souotSo$o 

TeaeAes ueea$oq Ssxe SOnTA sueJeTTp XTSUOTTTutSs Sett$ motIs senTA 

$sea-.l. "/.0"S o$ lzI'g tuoxj etSua SUO:Ig:Aop PJPU$S "etSg io sageA 0g o$ 

-/.I-

-ST-

O 

Ix,) 

O0 

',J7 

0 

0 bO 

177 

Z 73 

i 

(D 

73-< 

k.Yl 

0 

Z 

"7:] 

Z 

@ 

(1) (D 

0 

d- 0 

0 

"O Z m 

('b 

7 

J 

0 Ch 

bO 

O 

7 

E3 

Z 

7 Z 

Z 

(

Z - 

Z 

(]) 

(]) ) 

0 

- 

O 

Z 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0

-UZr-- 

0 

(D 

-U Z 

( 

o 

73 Z 

Z 

7 

- 

Z 

-o z 

7 B 0 

- 0 

7 

3 

7 

0 

o 

7] z 

J 

z 

0 

0 

7 

N 

7 

7

m 

o- I-rl C) O" 

(-) 

(D 2D (D 

(D 

-13z 

c 

z 

O 

- 

O cr--I 

C13 

" 

m 

-I- 

O 

z 

ITI 

C3 

"-13Z 

Z 

d) 

"1B O 

o 

0

O 0 

0 

-0 Z-- 

0 

7 

Cr- 

0 

z -o 

z 

(]) 

730 

(I) 

-+ 0 

0 

'-0 z IT1 

"7 

C) 

3 

z 

0 

7-1 

(b 

3 7 

C) o'- Z 

-I-- 

c 

7 Z 

z 

0 

-9 

7- 

7- 

0 

C) 

C)

Ix,] 

L 

O0 

0 

Ix] 

0 

0 

z 

o 

0 

- 

• • 

m 

-+ 

z 

m 

-13 

-t]z 

0 

- 0 

o 

o 

(1) • 

c 

0 

z 

0 

o-z 

o 

• o 

-'1 z 

m 

-+ 

o 

Z i-- 

7-J 

0 

• 

0 

0 

o 

00 

L 

C7 

"73Z 

c Z 

D 

0 

7 

C --I 

0 

7 

-0 Z 

C3 

Z 

- 0 

o.. 

o 

7 

3 

7 

0 

4 

7 

3 

Z 

0 

7 

Z 7 

0 

--F 

7 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

m 

7 

7 

7

177 

-0zr-- 

(3O 

0 

CO 

Ix) 

0 

0 

o 

177 

Z 73 

f-- 

(D 

7 3 - 

0 

7 Co 

z 

oo 

F 

-- 

-OZ 

730 

L 

Ix.) 

-0 

C 

"7 

7 

0 

"..41"0 

0 

Z 

7 

7" 

0 

-

Ch 

0 

-+ 0 

olx0 

Z 

(D 

0 

- 

(9 fD 

o 

-13 Z 

"+ 

0 

-H 

Z 

(I) 

< 

(I) 

0 

0 

0 

0

0 

0 

i-11 

C) 

0

-Zr-- 

F 

EV 

) D 

) 

Ix} 

Co 

0 0 

0 

-0 Z-- 

H- 0 

-OZ 

Z 

) 

0 

7 

uv- 

0 

Fq 

-F 

Z 

F 

-q 

-Z 

Z 

) 

) ) 

- 0 

0 

q3 Z IT1 

4 

7 

Ix.) 

-.--4 

0 

Z 

Z 

m 

Z

(OY'6) OL (S6"Yl) 9LI (99 Y) g ]WlOi 

Je^o-9 

(9S'I 9 (K6 K / (9'I) Y9- 

(16'I) 6 ([6") / (9S'I) / Y-I 

(9S'II) Kg (YO'I) gS (/0"9) YY Og-l 

(Kg') 9 (66"9) 91 (61"9) L OY-9 

(SO L (90"g 6 (lzC'L OlZ K-IK 

(g'L £ (L9 L 1 (9'11) $9 0-9S 

(OK 91) 99 (09 II) IS (O'gS) Ogl g-IS 

('L) SS (9') 6L (9 I) 9 0-91 

a3H.LO GSOIO NOI±VZIMO93±VO 

Aq pezuo6eeO 

e6v 

3S33V Jeq$o pesolo pue 'elqeAoldmeuR 'peAold3 

ssuellO 

i 37VI

(0 6) 0 (00 gl) 6I (09 ) 1VlOl 

G#O 

ecueJo 

(1 0 uePUl ueoJeuv 

(8: 18) 8 (86 L) 921 (91z (28) lzlz oJ6eN 

(iq'l) L£ (0 lz;5) :lz (lz'91) 06 eLqM 

aa8nN 

(%) 

C!3S070 

3HIO 

aaaNnN 

(%) 

aV lOq aVaNn NOIIVZINOO31VO 

37 

Aq pezuo6e4_eO 

eoel 

9S33V ueq4-O pesolo pue 'elqeAoldueufl 'peAoldw3 

S.l.ue19 

#I 378VI

(8q'6:) I/_Iz (/_8"IzI) /_/_I (qq'qz) Iz; 7V.L01 

(03 /_I)18 (5'I) /_ (6/_'91) 16 PeLoJodes 

(19":) /_I (;6":) / (08"Iz) 9Z: peJoA(] 

(19":) LI (;9"g) Ol (Sg'Z:) Izl peoPt4 

(Ig') 901 (06 0) L: (08":) 6;I PeJJIN 

(80":q) Og (Iz'Izq) 96 (:0";) 8; ellSus 

aaenN 

(%) 

(]qS07O :i"1 eVA03 elM3 Nn 9AO-I NOI±VZIO93±VO 

I3H.LO 

S le4_JelAl Aq pezJo6eLeo 

snLeL 

OS:I3V aeqLO pesolo pue 'elqeAoldueuFl 'peAoldu 3 

s4_uelO 

gl 378V1

('6) IL (80 1) 081 (8') qv±o± 

([6"09) LSg (68"8) 901 (gl'g) [8 ele3 

(LO'6) 81 (11 I) L (88"L) 09 elPM 

a3NnN 

(%) 

aSt$07O 37 ¥A07 aN3 NFI NO 1.1¥Z 

I3H/O 

Aq pezao6e,Le 3 

xes 

OS33V aeq,LO pesolo pue 'elqeAoldmeuF 'peAoldm 3 

S,LUeIO 

91 S17 8VI

(L9'6£) 191Z (Z9"Izl) OLI (OL'Iz) lie; 

(6 g II (IZ6"g ; (IC;'l 

(8"7L) (98" ZS) 01zY 

7VI01 

e.low JO 1 

sJee'/ 1 6 

(6C 0) (6"CI) L sJeeA g g 

(6C' 11 (6,'c; 6 (69"I 6 sJeeA Iz 0 

aaanN 

(%) 

C]3S070 37 eVA07 dN3Nn 

13H10 

a3amnN 

(%) 

NOIZVZIOO31¥O 

03AO7clN3 

Aq pezJo6ese 0 

uo$eanP3 

0S33V Jeq#o pesolo pue 'elqeAoldeu R 'peAoldm 3 

suelO 

LI 378V±

(66"91z) 9gg ('gg) f6 (g 6F) L93 oN 

(IO'(f) g (91 "tlz) (f (91z 0) gtg sea 

hl38INFIN (%) a3IINFIN 

(%) 

H±O 0 3 $09 0 39 lV,kO9 ala3 Nil 0 3A09 alN3 NO J.VZ 10931V0 

3 

#o spoeH so pezlaoBe$ 0 

sPloqesnoH 

0S33V aeq-l-O pesolo puo 'elqoAoldueuFl 'peAoldm 3 

ssuelO

(68'6) L (¢- gl) LI (80'817) 608 -IVlOI 

(::'0 1 

g-l 

(00) II 

(L9"O) (86 0 g Ol 

(L9 0 (86"0 g 6 

(6L'I 8 (91 ): (91" II 8 

(91 II (1: ; t, (lg' 81 L 

(08 L (gO Iz L (6") O 9 

(91 L (60"8 Izl (LO'L 9 g 

(LL'I) 99 (1 1) I ( gl) 8L 

(6L'81) 8 (O'gl) 98 (EL Pl) gL 

(99"61Z) gg (fg'Lg) 66 (80"Ig) 098 

N3HLO (]3SOlO 

a3anN 

(%) 

av ,o7 am3Nn NO ZVZ 0931V0 

37 

o JeqnN Aq pezIJo6e,eo 

scuepuedea 

OS33V aeq¢o pesolo pue elqeAoldeu R 'peAolam 3 

s,uelio 

61 378Vl

(8 01Z) 17 (8'lI) 8LI (L@'#I7) @E 7VJ.OJ. 

06 009 

009 0 

g:'O (61 "0 0 00 

(Ig'O) OOG Ogl 

(L:'O g 0;1 001 

(Ig'O ) (9 0 ((26 0 001 

(1'1 L (gl'l g (£g : g:l OG: 00£ 

((::;1 L (gl'i g (61'1 9 00(2 

(1i 1 Og (g9 OI (91": LI Og OOg 

(16"Izi) g:/_ (IZZ:'II) OZ: (9"6 E:; OOZ: OCjl 

(16"1) :L (L6"9g:) V (19"1) 1;,@ 01 

((2'1) (:::;L (6g 91) 6g (;''i) g8 001 OGO 

(00 L1) Lgg (80"L) 99 (6"0) Lg ($) 00 000 

a3HlO 0350]0 

a3eInN 

(%) 

ElY }07 aN3 Nn 

37 

a3]nN 

(%) 

3A07 NO I.I.VZ W0931¥0 

0 

-I-e emooul Aq pezao6eLe 0 

eoueLdeoov 

OS3=IV aeqLO pesolo pue 'elqeAoldmeuFi 'peAoldm3 

SLUeIO 

O 37V1

TABLE 21 

Unemployable, and Closed Other AEESC Clents 

Employed, 

by Receiving Publc Assistance at Referral 

Categorized 

ZATI ON EMP LOYE D 

CATEGOR 

(%) 

NUMBER 

EMP LOYAB LE 

UN 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

(%) 

NUMBER 

Yes 125 (23.23) 44 (24 72) 130 (26.92) 

No 413 (76.77) 134 (75.28) 353 (73.08) 

TOTAL 538 (44.87) 178 (14.85) 483 (40.28)

TABLE 22 

UnernDloyable, and Closed Other AEESC Cleqts 

Employed, 

by Length of Unemployment 

Categorlzed 

ZATI ON EMPLOYED 

CATEGOR 

-- (%) 

NUM 

m OYAPLE 

UNEM 

-R r%) 

NUMP 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

(%) 

IxlUMRER 

0 4 weeks 137 (2.36) 29 6.38) 8 f18 37) 

5 8 weeks 79 (14 74) I0 5,65) 55__(|I 48) 

9 16 weeks 72 (13.43) 22 (12.43) 5 ° (12 32) 

17 26 weeks 

27 52 weeks 

34 6 3#) 15 8 a7) 3 7 93) 

47 8.77) 18 (10.17) 54 (11 27) 

53 weeks or more 87 (16 23) 45 (25 42) 112 2_3,38) 

Never worked 43 8 02) 25 (14 12) 41 (8.56) 

Unknown II 2 05) 7 (3.95) 21 4.38) 

Concu rrent Un ernp oyment 

TOTAL 

26 4 85) 

536 (44 97) 

6(539) 

177 (I 4 85) 

II 2 30) 

47mr #0 18)

TABLE 23 


Employed, 

by Level of Employment 

Categorized 

EMP LOYE D 

CATEGORIZATION 

(%) 

NUMBER 

EMP LOYAB LE 

UN 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

(%) 

NUMBER 

ndustry 

Unskllled 

constructlon 87 (16.57) 22 (12 50) 60 (12 66) 

or 

Unsklled agriculture 2 (0.38) 2 (1.14) 0 21) 

Home domestlc 70 (13.33) 16 9 09) 55 (11.60) 

lled service other 

Unskl 

household 

than 

177 (33 71) 79 (44.89) 199 (41.98) 

ope ra'tor, 

Industrial 

37 (7.05) 7 (3.98) 41 (8.65) 

sem-skllled 

Other sem-sklled 57 (10.86) 7 (3.98) 24 (5.06) 

Skllled worker 21 (4.00) 7 3 98) 12 2 53) 

Clercal 27 5 14) 5 (2.84) 31 (6.54) 

Other-undetermlned 47 (8.95) 31 (17 61) 51 (10.76) 

TOTAL 525 (44 68) 176 (14 98) 474 (40 34)

TABLE 24 


Employed, 

by Criminal Record 

Categorized 

EMP LOYE D 


(%) 

NUMBER 

EMP LOYAB LE 

UN 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

(%) 

NUMBER 

None 367 (68.60) 115 (64 97) 296 (61.28) 

Arrests, no convlctons 33 (6.17) II (6.21) 17 (3.52) 

Msdemeanor convlcton 31 (5.79) 15 8 47) 41 (8.49) 

e rty f e on es 

Prop 

es invol'vi"ng 

Fel'on 

9 (1.68) 3 69) 15 3 II) 

another person 3 (0.56) 0 56) 3 (0.62) 

Other undetermined 92 (17 20) 32 (18 08) III (22 98) 

TOTAL 535 (44.77) 177 (14.81) 483 (40 42)

TABLE 25 


Employed, 

by Vocational Potential (Social Work) 

Categorized 


CATEGOR 

(%) 

NUMBER 

EMP LOYAB LE 

UN 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

(%) 

NUMBER 

Excellent 198 (37 43) I0 5 65) 103 (21.41) 

Guarded 297 (56 14) 126 ,.(71 19) 

Poor 34 6 43) 41 (23,16) 

TOTAL 529 (44 57) 177 (14 91) 

3O5 (63.41) 

73 (15,18) 

481 (40.52)

TABLE 26 


Employed, 

by Number of D lsabll tes 

Categorized 


CATEGOR 

(%) 

NUMBER 

EMP LOYAB LE 

UN 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

(%) 

NUMBER 

one 95 (22 89) 19 (14.29) 48 (15 19) 

two 104 (25.06) 34 (25 56) 79 (25.00) 

three 88 (21 20) 34 (25 56) 75 (23.73) 

four 42 (I0.12) 18 (13 53) 46 (14 56) 

flve 24 (5.78) 8 6 02) 27 (8.54) 

sx 8 (1.93) 7 5 26) 17 (5.38) 

seven or more 4 0 96) 6 4 51) 4 (1.27) 

none 50 (12 05) 6 (4.51) 20 6 33) 

not known (0.75) 

TOTAL 415 (48 03) 133 (15 39) 316 (36 57)

TABLE 27 


Employed, 

by Number of llegtmate Children 

Categorlzed 

EMP LOYE D 


(%) 

NUMBER 

EMP LOYAB LE 

UN 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

(%) 

NUMBER 

one 38 (19.59) 21 (30 43) 55 (28 95) 

two 25 (12 89) 4 (5.80) 23 (12.11) 

three I0 (5.15) 7 (10.14) 13 (6.84) 

four 3 (1.55) 3 4 35) 5 (2.63) 

fve 3 (1.55) (1.45) 2 05) 

slx 

seven 

(0.52) 

eght or more 2 1.05) 

none 114 (58 76) 33 (47 83) 90 (47.37) 

TOTAL 194 (42 83) 69 (15.23) 190 (41.94)

TAB LE 28 


Employed, 

by Approximate Family Monthly Income at Closure 

Categorized 

EMP LOYE D 


(%) 

NUMBER 

EMP LOYAB LE 

UN 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

(%) 

NUMBER 

0 I00 ($) 6 1.12) 27 (15.34) 26 (§,92) 

I00 149 8 1.49) 12 6 82) 21 4,78) 

150- 199 8 (1.49) 4 (2.27) 13 (2.96) 

200 249 38 7 08) 5 (2.84) 8 (1,82) 

250 299 79 (14.71) (0.57) 6 (1,37) 

300 349 57 (I0.61) 2 (1.14) 6 37) 

350- 399 37 (6.89) 3 (1.70) 2 (0.46) 

400 above 145 (27 00) 4 (2.27) 6 37) 

not known 159 (29 61) I18 (67 05) 351 (79 95) 

TOTAL 537 (46.61) 176 (15.28) 439 (38.11)

TABLE 29 


Employed, 

by Receiving Publc Assistance at Closure 

Categorized 


CATEGOR 

(%) 

NUMBER 

EMP LOYAB LE 

UN 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

(%) 

NUMBER 

AD 5 0.94) 12 6 86) 9 1.95) 

AFDC 50 (9.38) 15 8 57) 56 (12 02) 

GA 2 1.14) 3 0 64) 

AB 

type not 

Assistance, 

known or not sure 87 (16.32) 52 (29.71) 136 (29.18) 

No assistance 391 (73.36) 94 (53.71) 262 (5622) 

TOTAL 533 (45.40) 175 (14.91) 466 (39 69)

TABLE 30 


Employed, 

by Remedlal Education 

Categorized 

EMP LOYE D 


(%) 

NUMBER 

EMP LOYAB LE 

UN 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

(%) 

NUMBER 

referred, Hlgh 

Not 

Graduate 189 (31.50) 29 (14.57) 109 (19.09) 

School 

referred, 

Not 

reasons 273 (45.50) 144 (72 36) 351 (61 47) 

other 

but 

Referred 

ld not attend 8 33) 7 3 52) 31 5 43) 

d 

but dd 

Accepted, 

take GED 

not 

GED, 

took 

not pass 

dd 

99 (16.50) 18 9 05) 75 (13.13) 

GED 

-Took 

Dassed 31 (5.17) (0.50) 4 0 72) 

and 

TOTAL 600 (43.80) 199 (14.53) 571 (41 68) 

0 18)

TABLE 31 


Emploved, 

by Potential for Tra 

Categorized 


CATEGOR 

(%) 

NUMBER 

EMP LOYAB LE 

UN 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

() 

NUMBER 

recommended, 

not 

ready trained 16 2.73) 5 2.54) 9 58) 

a 

recommended, no 

not 

ra n ng obj ect Ive I01 (17 24) 105 (53 30) 179 (31 46) 

t 

but dd 

recommended, 

undertake tra.nng 

not 

recommended, 

complete 

not 

comple+ed, bu not 

training 

n related empl_oyent 

.placed 

53 9 04) 17 8 63) 67 (II 78) 

34 5.80) 24 (12 18) 81 (14 24) 

44 7.51) 31 (15.74) 38 6.68) 

& related 

tralnng 

achieved 274 (46.76) 12 2 II) 

placement 

other 64 (I0 92) 15 (7.61) 183 (32.16) 

TOTAL 586 (43.34) 197 (14.57) 569 (42.09)

TABLE 32 


Employed, 

by Type of Training Program 

Categorlzed 

EMP LOYE D 


(%) 

NUMBER 

EMP LOYAB LE 

UN 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

(%) 

NUMBER 

clerlcal 44 (9.87) 6 (6.12) 29 (9.57) 

building trades 3 (0.67) (1.02) 2 (0.66) 

Industrial trades 182 (40.81) I0 (10.20) 66 (21.78) 

automot ve trades 7 1.57) 6 6.12) 3 0 99) 

medical support 2 0 45) 2 (0.66) 

service trades 49 (10.99) 16 (16 33) 17 5 61) 

sewing 48 (10.76) 2 (2.04) I0 (3.30) 

cashiering and sales 4 (0.90) (0.33) 

other 107 (23.99) 57 (58.16) 173 (57.10) 

TOTAL 446 (52 66) 98 (11.57) 303 (35.77)

TABLE 33 


Employed, 

by Type of Training Faclty 

Categorized 

EMP LOYE D 


(%) 

NUMBER 

EMP LOYAB LE 

UN 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

(%) 

NUMBER 

dd not enter training 140 (24.96) I00 (62.11) 185 (38 95) 

AEESC tralnng 103 (18.36) 8 4 97) 22 4 63) 

tralnng 202 (36.01) 0 62) 133 (28,00) 

MDTA 

County or 

city, 

faclllty. 

State 

sponsored training 95 (16,93) 46 (28.57) 73 (15 37) 

EOA 

0.18) II 2.32) 

faclllty II (1.96) 4 (0.84) 

prlvate 

or other 

GRC 

VR facl Ity 2 (0.36) 

college education (0.62) 

other 7 (1.25) 5 (3.11) 47 (9.89) 

TOTAL 561 (46.87) 161 (13 45) 475 (39 68)

TABLE 34 


Employed, 

by Work Potential Referral 

Categorized 

EMP LOYE D 


(%) 

NUMBER 

EMP LOYAB LE 

UN 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

(%) 

NUMBER 

not referred 285 (47.50) 127 (63 82) 354 (61 78) 

clent 

but 

referred 

evaluated 21 3 50) I0 (5.03) 96 (16 75) 

not 

evaluation, 

----ref 

statement only 130 (21.67) 19 (9.55) 56 (9.77) 

full evaluation 164 (27.33) 41 (20 60) 64 (11.17) 

other 2 01) 3 0 52) 

TOTAL 600 (43.73) 199 (14.50) 573 (41 76)

TABLE 35 

Unemployable and Closed Other AEESC Clents 

Employed, 

by Reason for Workshop Referral 

Categorized 

EMP LOYE D 


(%) 

NUMBER 

referred 

not 

than one week 

less 

n 

workshop 

ent n work adjustment 

c 

of lack of 

I--because 

experience 

work 

of physical 

because 

problems n work 

of retardation 

because 

6f emotional 

because 

65 (I0.82).. 

65 (I.0.82) 

73 (12 15) 

50 (8.32) 

EMP LOYAB LE 

UN 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

(%) 

NUMBER 

25 (12 56) I02 (17 O8) 

33 (16 58) 22 3 84) 

29 4 83) 26 (13.07) 19 3 32) 

or actlng-out problems 22 (3.66) 24 (12 06) 35 6 II) 

no particular obJective 47 (7.82) 13 (6.53) 21 (3.66) 

other 250 (41 60) 35 (17.59) 120 (20.94) 

TOTAL 601 (43 77) 199 (14.49) 573 (41 73)

TABLE 36 

Unemployable, and Closed Other AEESC Clen-s 

Employed, 

by ProJect at Center 

Categorized 

EMP LOYE D 


(%) 

NUMBER 

Aglng ProJect 

EMP LOYAB LE 

UN 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

(%) 

NUMBER 

Welfare ProJect 39 (6.49) 23 (11.56) 36 (6.28) 

Mental Health ProJect 9 (1.50) 13 (6.53) 20 (3.49) 

Mental Retardation Proj. ect 

24 3.99) 20 (10.05) 17 2 97) 

General Program 199 (33.11) 53 (26 63) 192 (33 51) 

MDTA Program 165 (27.45) 0 50) 78 (13.61) 

ACEP Program 155 (25 79) 73 (36 68) 217 (37 87) 

Other I0 66) 16 (8.04) 13 (2.27) 

TOTAL 601 (43.77) 199 (14 49) 573 (41.73)

TABLE 37 


Employed, 

by VR Referral 

Categorized 

ZATI ON EMPLOYED 

CATEGOR 

(%) 

NUMBER 

EMP LOYAB LE 

UN 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

(%) 

NUMBER 

by outside VR 151 (25.25) 69 (34.85) 125 (21.97) 

..referred 

other, found to 

referred 

on VR caseload 9 (1.51) 2 (1.01) 4 0 70) 

be 

to Center VR, 

referred 

for services 156 (26.09) 6 (3.03) 56 9 84) 

accepted 

to Center 

referred 

not accept.ed 

VR 

other VR, 

referred 

for services 

accepted 

other VR, 

referred 

accepted 

not 

106 (17.73) 27 (13.64) 147 (25.83) 

30 5.02) 7 3.54) 49 8.61) 

65 (I0 87) 18 9 09) 54 9.49) 

or 

other 

81 (13.55) 69 (34 85) 134 (23 55) 

non-applcable 

TOTAL 598 (43.81) 198 (14 51) 569 (41 68)

TABLE 38 

Unemployable and Closed Other AEESC Clents 

Employed, 

by Psycho oglcal Evaluation 

Categorized 


CATEGOR 

(%) 

NUMBER 

EMP LOYAB LE 

UN 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

(%) 

NUMBER 

by any source 

provided 

to referral 39 (6.52) 20 (I0 I0) 24 4 20) 

prior 

psychological purchased 508 (84.95) 159 (80 30) 514 (90 02) 

no 

logcal purchased 

psycho 

Center counselor 36 (6.02) 12 (6.06) 13 (2.28) 

_._by 

logical purchased 

psycho 

VR counselor 7(1.17) 5 (2.53) 7 (1.23) 

by 

other 8 (1.34) 2 01) 13 (2.28) 

TOTAL 59 (43.75) 198 (14.48) 571 (41.77)

39 

TABLE 


Employed, 

Categorized by Counselor recommendation at Staffing 

EMP LOYE D 


(%) 

NUMBER 

EMP LOYAB LE 

UN 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

(%) 

NUMBER 

training 386 (64 55) 60 (30.30) 263 (46.14) 

employment 

mmedate 

services prior 

fd'rther 

107 (17 89) II (556) 38 6 66) 

to employment 37 6 19; 18 9 09) 37 6 49) 

tered workshop.. 

she 

to prlor job 

return 

employed at 

----client 

of staffing 

tme 

3 0 50) 5 2 53) 5 0 87) 

5 0 84) 0 51) 0.17) 

34 5 69) 4 2 02) 5 0.87) 

indefinitely 

placement 

4 0 67) 14 7 07) 102 (17 89) 

Interrupted 

considered 

client 

42 (21 21) 17 2 98) 

unemployable 

other 22 (3.68) 43 (21 72) 102 (17 89) 

TOTAL 598 (43 78) 198 (14.49) 570 (41 73)

TABLE 40 


Employed, 

by Results of Evaluation at Dscharge 

Categorized 

EMP LOYE D 


(%) 

NUMBER 

EMP LOYAB LE 

UN 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

(%) 

NUMBER 

evaluation 

comprehensive 

summary 188 (31.60) 26 (18 07) 56 9 81) 

wth 

(2 3 week) 

brief 

wth report 319 (53.61) 80 (40.20) 274 (47 99) 

evaluation 

-comp ete eva uat on, 

objective achieved 

but 

not motlvated, 

incomplete, 

or fnancal problems 

circUmstanCes 

nc6mplete, 

ntervened 

left 

-incomplete,client 

for employment 

early 

original'health 

'ncomplete, 

58 (9.75) 24 (12.06) 47 8 23) 

2 (0.34) 32 (16.08) 53 (928) 

5 (0.84) 13 (6.53) 93 (16 29) 

22 (3.70) 3 (1.51) 9 (1.58) 

problem prevented contlnuance (0.17) 21 (I0 55) 39 (6.83) 

TOTAL 595 (43.59) 199 (14.58) 571 (41.83)

TABLE 41 

Unemployable, and Closed Other AEESC CI ents 

Employed, 

by Level of Employment at Closure 

Categorized 

EMP LOYE D 


(%) 

NUMBER 

EMP LOYAB LE 

UN 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

(%) 

NUMBER 

ndustral 

unsklled 

construction 34 (5.77) (1.75) 2 23) 

or 

domestic 13 (2.21) 2 (3.51) 4 2 47) 

home 

service 

unsklled 

than household 99 (16.81) 

other 

operator, 

Industrial 

sem-sklled 

other seml-skllled 

skl led worker 38 (6.45) 

68 (II.54) 

clerical 

professional, 

196 (33.28) 1.75) 0 62) 

109 (18.51) 3 5.26) 

technical, managerial 8 36) 1.75) 2 1.23) 

other 24 (4.07) 49 (85.96) 153 (94 44) 

TOTAL 589 (72 90) 57 7 05) 162 (20.05)

TABLE 42 

Unemployable, and Closed Other AEESC CI ents 

Employed, 

by Weekly Earnings at Closure 

Categorized 

EMPLOYED 


(%) 

NUMBER 

UNEMPLOYABLE 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

(%) 

NUMBER 

0 39 ($) 26 4 40) 35 (85 37) 125 (93.28) 

40 49 21 3 55) 

50 59 75 (12 69) 2 44) 0.75) 

60 69 174 (29.44) 

70 79 81 (13.71) 2 49) 

80 99 59 (9.98) (2.44) 

I00 119 14 2 37) 

120 above 137 (23.18) 

housewlfe 4 (0.68) 4 (9.76) 6 4 48) 

TOTAL 591 (77 15) 41 (5.35) 134 (17.49)

TABLE 43 

Uremployable and Closed Other AEESC Clents 

Employed, 

b,, Rehabltaton Prognosls (Work Potential) 

Categorized 

EMP LOYE D 


(%) 

NUMBER 

EMP LOYAB LE 

UN 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

() 

,UMBER 

Excel lent 136 (65.07) II (25 00) 4 (47 83) 

Guarded 63 (30 14) 20 (45.45) 31 (33 70) 

Poor I0 (4.78) t (29 55) 17 (18 48) 

TOTAL 209 (60.58) 44, 12.75) 92 (26.67)

TABLE 44 

Unemployable, and Closed Other AEESC Cllents 

Employed, 

by Rehabltatlon Prognoss (Work Adjustment) 

Categorized 

EMP LOYE D 


(%) 

NUMBER 

EMP LOYAB LE 

UN 

(%) 

NUMBER 

OTHER 

CLOSED 

(%) 

NUMBER 

Excellent 109 (38.93) 14 (16.28) 60 (34.09) 

Guarded 146 (52.14) 46 (53.49) 81 (46.02) 

Poor 25 (8.93) 26 (30 23) 35 (19.89) 

TOTAL 280 (51.66) 86 (15.87) 176 (32 47)

Chl 

2 3 

298 987 1285 

9.1 524 615 

TABLE 45 

Dstrbuton for AEESC Clents 

Square 

Age and Race 

on 

428 

289 

5 82 224 306 

6 146 2 90 4 36 

7 47 43 90 

8 38 44 82 

9 4 2 6 

843 2694 3537 

Square 129 7* 

*Sgnfcant at the 05 level

Ch 

TABLE 46 


Square 

Age and Marital Status 

on 

2 3 4 5 6 

1077 123 15 68 1284 

2 306 135 5 31 138 615 

3 115 123 9 32 146 425 

4 46 94 13 28 105 286 

5 54 108 20 24 95 301 

6 54 158 56 43 117 428 

7 19 18 24 14 12 87 

8 23 24 7 17 82 

9 0 3 3 0 0 6 

1682 785 155 194 698 3514 

Ch Square 1594.2" 


2 3 

613 674 1287 

2 195 421 616 

3 118 311 429 

4 75 2 15 290 

5 81 225 306 

6 148 286 434 

7 35 54 89 

8 32 47 79 

9 3 3 6 

1300 2236 3536 


TABLE 47 

Square Dstrbuton for AEESC Clents 

Ch 

Age and Sex 

on 

*Sgnfcant at the .05 level

Ch 

TABLE 48 


Square 

Age and Educatlon 

on 

2 3 4 5 

13 z218 1000 8 12 39 

2 3 102 500 7 612 

3 7 78 325 16 426 

4 14 71 191 I0 286 

5 29 92 174 8 303 

6 50 156 207 18 431 

7 13 40 29 7 89 

8 3 37 25 7 82 

9 4 0 6 

146 795 2452 81 3474 



Ch 

TABLE 49 


Square 

Race and Marital Status 

on 

2 3 4 5 6 

386 217 38 87 108 836 

2 1294 567 117 107 592 2677 

3 1680 784 155 194 700 3513 

4 

Ch Square 81.6* 

*Sgnflcant at the .05 level

TABLE 50 

Square Dstrbutlon for AEESC Clents 

Ch 

Race and Sex 

on 

2 3 

40 3 4 38 841 

2 898 1795 2693 

3 301 2233 3534 

4 

Chl Square 58.5* 

*Sgnflcant at the 05 level

TABLE 51 


Ch 

Race and Education 

on 

2 3 4 5 

58 314 413 36 821 

2 88 483 2035 45 2651 

3 146 797 2448 81 3472 

4 

Ch Square 212 I* 


2 3 

812 871 1683 

2 361 424 785 

3 13 140 153 

4 41 152 193 

5 63 635 698 

6 1290 2222 3512 

Ch Square 427 9* 

TAB LE 52 


Ch 

Marital Status and Sex 

on 


TABLE 53 


Square 

Marital Status and Educatlon 

on 

2 3 4 5 

37 307 1251 35 1630 

2 51 193 514 22 780 

3 18 61 65 I0 154 

4 8 48 130 5 191 

5 30 181 477 8 696 

6 144 790 2437 80 3451 


*Sgnlfcant at the 05 level

T/'?LE 54 

Sciue,-e Dslrbt,ton for AEESP (-Icnts 

Chl 

Sex and Education 

rn 

2 3 4 5 

69 286 869 36 1260 

2 75 511 1582 45 2213 

3 144 797 2451 81 3473 

4 

Ch Sqlare II.5

TAB LE 55 

Saua-e Dstrbuton for AEESC Clents 

Ch 

Race and Potential for Training 

on 

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

13 91 25 14 ? 28 38 218 

2 14 268 R 91 c2 228 172 954 

3 27 359 I 105 191 256 2'0 1172 

Square 45 - 

*Sicn'fcant at 05 eve'

TABLE 56 


Ch 

Race and VR Referral 

on 

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

149 4 17 30 4 3 12 219 

2 72 I0 182 2 13 59 I00 230 966 

3 321 14 199 243 63 103 242 185 

4 


*Sgnlfcant at 05 level

TABLE 57 


Ch 

Race and Counselor's Recommendation at Staffing 

on 

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 

63 39 26 5 0 7 27 18 33 218 

2 520 105 60 7 7 35 82 38 114 968 

3 583 144 86 12 7 42 109 56 147 1186 

4 



TABLE 58 


Ch 

Race and Result of Evaluation at Dscharge 

on 

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

67 49 21 14 36 21 2 19 

2 180 508 92 68 63 22 35 96 8 

3 247 557 113 82 99 33 56 1187 

4 



TABLE 59 


Ch 

Race and Reason for Closure 

on 

2 3 4 5 6 7 

90 43 27 25 23 12 220 

454 136 124 124 64 70 972 

544 179 151 149 87 82 192 

Ch Square 9 8

TABLE 60 


Ch 

Race and Level of Employment at Closure 

on 

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 

7 3 21 12 12 9 18 5 39 126 

2 27 12 73 171 84 24 43 4 145 583 

3 34 15 94 183 96 33 61 9 184 709 

4 



TABLE 61 

Square Dstrlbuton for AEESC Clents 

Ch 

Race and Publc Assistance at Closure 

on 

2 3 4 5 6 7 

9 15 2 0 28 158 212 

2 19 107 4 0 246 587 963 

3 28 122 6 0 274 745 175 

4 



TABLE 62 


Ch 

Race and Rehabltaton Prognoss (Work AdJustment) 

on 

2 3 4 

76 12 9 65 2 70 

2 243 379 118 740 

3 319 508 183 I010 

4 

Ch Square 9.1

TABLE 63 

Square Dstrbuton for AEESC CI ents 

Ch 

Race and Potential 

on 

2 3 

236 26 262 

2 519 32 551 

3 755 58 813 

4 

Ch Square 4.5

TAB LE 64 


Ch 

Race and Rehabltaton Prognoss (Work Potentlal) 

on 

2 3 4 

104 III 45 260 

2 292 186 74 532 

3 396 297 119 812 


*Sgnlfcant at the .05 level

2 3 

162 560 722 

2 944 1520 2464 

3 I106 2080 3186 

4 

Ch Square 62 I* 

TABLE 65 

Square Dlstrbuton for AEESC CI ents 

Ch 

Race and Pub lc Assistance at Referral 

on 


TABLE 66 

Squarp Distribution for AEESP Cleqts 

Ch 

Race and t4oJ oqg Unea,)lo,ed 

on 

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 

62 40 64 44 66 22 143 48 34 722 

2 374 224 275 207 254 551 170 227 166 2448 

3 436 264 339 251 320 772 313 275 200 3170 

4 


*Slgnfcant at the 05 level

TAB LE 67 


Square 

Race and Criminal Record 

on 

2 3 4 5 6 7 

430 29 21 2 228 721 

2 1333 I0 137 27 13 830 2450 

3 1763 139 158 38 15 1058 3171 

4 

Ch Square 13 5

T#BLE 68 


Ch 

Race and Social Worker's Critical Rating (Casework) 

on 

2 3 4 

98 431 184 713 

2 546 1421 453 2420 

3 644 1852 637 3133 

4 



TABLE 69 

Square Dstrbuton for AEESC CI ents 

Ch 

Race and Vocational Prognoss (Psychology) 

on 

2 3 4 

57 174 131 362 

2 291 684 323 1298 

3 948 .858 454 1660 

4 



TBLE q 

Square Dslrbuton for AEESC Clents 

Ch 

Pace and MEdical Prognoss rMedcal) 

on 

2 3 4 5 6 8 9 

49 170 59 21 35 4 343 

2 2 74 751 135 37 76 22 9 1305 

3 323 921 194 58 26 13 2 1648 

4 

Ch Square 38.5 * 


TABLE 71 


Ch 

Sex and Potential for Training 

on 

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

13 122 53 74 35 153 61 511 

2 15 237 64 31 66 I01 149 663 

3 28 359 17 105 I01 254 2 I0 174 

4 



Ch 

TAB LE 72 

Dstrbuton for AEESC CI ents 

Square 

Sex and VR Referral 

on 

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

140 8 98 138 22 25 85 516 

2 82 6 O0 107 41 77 158 671 

3 322 14 198 245 63 102 243 1187 

4 



TABLE 73 

Squre Dstrlbutlon for AEESC Clents 

Chl 

Sex and Cunselor's Recommendatlon at Staffing 

on 

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 

322 52 31 4 14 26 20 47 517 

2 260 93 55 8 6 28 84 36 I01 671 

3 582 I15 86 I? 7 42 I0 56 148 188 

4 



TABLE 74 

Square Dstrlbuton for AEESC Clents 

Ch 

Sex and Result of Evaluation at Dscharge 

on 

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

57 302 82 20 25 12 20 518 

2 19LO 257 32 61 74 2 36 671 

3 247 559 114 81 99 33 56 189 

4 

Square 131 7* 

*Sgnfcant at The 05 level

TAB LE 75 

Dstrlbuton for AEESC Clents 

Square 

Sex and Reason for Closure 

on 

2 3 4 5 6 7 

260 74 54 55 30 45 518 

2 283 106 97 94 57 39 676 

3 543 180 151 149 87 84 1194 

4 


*Sgnlflcant at the 05 level

TABLE 76 


Ch 

Sex and Level of Employment at Closure 

on 

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 

21 32 134 30 16 I0 6 75 325 

2 13 14 61 49 65 17 51 4 III 385 

3 34 15 93 183 95 33 61 I0 186 710 

4 



TAB LE 77 

Square Dlstrbuton for AEESC Clents 

Ch 

Sex and Publc Assistance at Closure 

on 

2 3 4 5 6 7 

17 5 0 81 406 510 

2 117 5 0 193 340 666 

3 28 122 6 0 274 746 1176 

4 

Ch Square = 140.2" 

*Significant at the .05 level

TAB LE 78 

Square Dlstrlbuton for AEESC Clents 

Ch 

Sex and Rehablltaton Prognoss (Work Adjustment) 

on 

2 3 4 

103 229 83 415 

2 215 2 80 99 594 

3 318 509 182 1009 

4 



TABLE 79 


Ch 

Sex and Publlc Assistance at Referral 

on 

2 3 

166 1004 170 

2 940 1076 2016 

3 1106 2080 3186 

4 

CI Square 343.7* 


TABLE 80 

Square Dstrbuton for AEESC Clients 

Ch 

Sex and How Long Unemployed 

on 

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 

234 118 127 103 99 207 97 116 59 1160 

2 204 143 212 148 220 566 216 160 141 2010 

3 438 261 339 251 319 773 313 276 200 3170 

4 


*Sgnlfcant at the .05 level

Ch 

TABLE 81 

Dstrbuton fc>r ar b(' O, onls 

Square 

Sex and Crrn,n 

on 

2 3 4 5 6 

562 73 115 33 12 

2 1201 65 43 6 4 

3 1763 138 158 39 16 

4 

Square 171.5" 

105/ 51,t 

*Signlfl, Jib et the 05 level

TABLE 82 

Square Dstrbuton for AEESC Cllents 

Ch 

Sex and Social Worker's Critical Rating (Casework) 

on 

2 3 4 

296 622 228 1146 

2 346 1233 408 1987 

3 642 1855 636 3133 

4 

Square 32.7* 


TABLE 83 


Ch 

Sex and VR Prognoss (Psychology) 

on 

2 3 4 

141 293 159 593 

2 204 564 295 1063 

3 345 857 454 1656 

4 

Square 4 9

TABLE 84 


Ch 

Sex and Medical Prognoss (Medical) 

on 

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 

183 328 81 17 51 I0 6 2 678 

2 141 594 113 40 57 16 7 0 968 

3 324 922 194 57 108 26 13 2 1646 

4 

Chl Square 51.0" 


TABLE 85 

Standard Deviations, Numbers of Observations, and t-test Values 

Means, 

Beta IQ Scores of AEESC CI ents Categorized on Age 

for 

Q Beta Q Number of 

Beta 

Stan da rd Dev at on Obse rvat on s 

Mean 

16-20 86.13 3 98 669 

21-25 84 21 2 76 280 

26-30 85.43 3.54 184 

31-35 84.20 2 43 131 

36-40 86.30 5 46 128 

41-50 88.71 .95 189 

51-54 90.70 O. 95 27 

55-64 89.67 .27 36 

65-over 94 25 3 25 4

2 -2.06* 

3 -0.62 O. 97 

4 -I .60 0.009 -0.83 

TABLE 85 continued 

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 

5 0 12 1.34 0.52 21 

2 52* 3 90* 2.48* 3.25* 49 

2.10" 2.90* 2.26* 2 74* 1.75 0 87 

1.81 2 69* 1.99 2.52* 1.45 0.46 -0 37 

22 1.51 32 1.50 1.17 0 83 0.51 0 67 

*Slgnfcant at the .05 level

TABLE 86 


Means, 

Gates Reading Test Scores of AEESC Clents Categorized on Age 

for 

Readlnq Test Gates Readnq Test Number of 

Gates 

Standard Deviation Observations 

Mean 

16-20 5.35 2.56 683 

21-25 5.95 2 25 286 

26-30 6.25 4.38 189 

31-35 5.44 2 49 130 

36-40 5.65 2.72 130 

41-50 5.74 2 25 188 

51-54 5.83 2.14 29 

55-64 5 92 3 19 38 

65-over 8.50 5.07 4

2 

3.64* 

3 2 70* 0 87 

4 0.35 -2.02" -2 II* 

Table 86 continued 

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 

5 1.16 -I I0 -1.51 0.67 

6 2.04* -0.99 -1.42 1.12 0 31 

7 1.16 -0 30 -0 84 0 86 0 38 0 19 

08 -0 63 -0.55 0 86 0 47 0 32 0 14 

9 24 1.00 0 88 1.20 1.12 09 0 1.00 


TABLE 87 


Means, 

Arithmetic Level Scores of AEESC Clents Categorized on Age 

for 

Level Arithmetic Level Number of 

Arithmetic 

Standard Devatlon Observations 

Mean 

16-20 5.25 2.32 686 

21-25 5 25 94 287 

26-30 5 40 5.70 190 

31-35 5.04 7 03 128 

36-40 4 49 2.13 130 

41-50 4.36 .97 191 

51-54 4.31 .95 29 

55-64 3.79 2 51 38 

65-over 4 75 2.75 4

2 

-0.39 

3 0 34 0 35 

4 -0.35 -0 34 -0 48 

Table 87 continued 

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

5 -3 69* -3.46* -2 00" -0 84 

6 -5 33* -4 86* -2 37* -1.06 -0 56 

7 -2 54* -2 48* -I 98* -I.01 -0 45 -0 13 

8 -3.53* -3 46* -2.78* -I 68 -I 57 -I 33 -0 96 

9 -0 37 -0.36 -0 45 -0 19 0 19 0 28 0 31 0 67 

*Slgnflcant at the 05 level

TABLE 88 

Standard Devlatlons, Numbers of Observations, and t-test Values 

Means, 

Beta IQ Scores of AEESC CI ents Categorized on Race 

for 


Beta 


Mean 

White 89.76 14 32 342 

Negro 85 03 13 08 1309 

2 -5 55* 


TABLE 89 


Means, 

Gates Readlng Test Scores of AEESC Clents Categorized on Race 

for 

Reading Test Gates Reading Test Number of 

Gates 


Mean 

Whlte 6 30 3 02 357 

Negro 5 47 2 70 1323 

2 -4.72* 

*Slgnflcant at the .05 level

2 

TABLE 90 

Standard Deviations, Number of Observations, and t-test Values 

Means, 

Arithmetic Level Scores of AEESC Clents Categorized on Race 

for 

Level Arthmetlc Level Number of 

Arithmetic 

Stan da rd Dev at on Obse rvat ons 

Mean 

White 5 43 2 59 358 

Negro 4 92 3 54 1328 

-3.04* 


TABLE 91 


Means, 

Beta I0 Scores of AEESC Clents Categorized on Marital Status 

for 


Beta 

Standard Dev at on Observat ons 

Mean 

Sngle 84 92 13.68 827 

Married 89.00 13 19 359 

Wdowed 87. I0 .02 76 

Dvorced 88.62 16.17 78 

Separated 84.42 12 44 307 

2 4 83* 

3 1.62 -I 31 

2 3 4 

4 95 -0.19 0.68 

5 -0.58 -4.60* -1.85 -2 14" 


TABLE q2 


Means, 

Gates Reading Test Scores of AEESC Clents Categorized on Marital Status 

for 

Reading Test 

Gates 

Mean 

Read,ng Test 

Gates 

Deviation 

Standard 

of 

Number 

Observations 

Sngle 5 39 2 54 847 

Marrled 6 16 3 56 364 

Wdowed 5 47 2 50 76 

Dvorced 6 58 2 59 79 

Separated 5 52 2 34 311 

2 3.76* 

3 0.28 -2 02* 

2 3 4 

4 3 92* 21 2 71" 

5 0 82 -2 81" 0 15 -3 31" 


2 

TAB LE 93 


Means, 

Arithmetic Level Scores of AEESC CI ents Categorized on Marital Status 

for 

Level Arithmetic Level Number of 

Arthmetlc 


Mean 

Sngle 5.12 2 23 848 

Married 5.39 4 46 367 

Wdowed 4.09 83 76 

Dvorced 5 03 86 79 

Separated 4.59 4 68 312 

I.II 

3 -4 61" -4.15" 

2 3 4 

4 -0 43 -I 17 3 15" 

5 -I 92 -2.27* 48 -I 28 


TABLE 94 


Means, 

Beta Q Scores of AEESC C ents Categorized by Sex 

for 

IQ Beta IQ Number of 

Beta 


Mean 

Male 88.48 13 86 593 

Female 84 63 13.07 1054 

2 -5 52* 

*Significant at the 05 level

2 

TABLE 95 


Means, 

Gates Reading Level Scores of AEESC C lents Categorized by Sex 

for 

Readnq Test Gates Reading Test Number of 

Gates 

Standard Devlatlon Observations 

Mean 

Male 5 91 3 46 610 

Female 5 49 2 31 1066 

-2.68* 


TAm E 96 

Standard Deval.c.ns Numbe o OLservatons, and t-test Values 

Means, 

Arithmetic Lpvc S(,b-es o ' C i ,ent- Ca-egorlzed by Sex 

for 

Level A.-.amet,c [eb. 

Arithmetic 

$I- rd Dev T, 

'e,n 

'umbe 

Oberve 

Male 5 52 3 85 614 

Female 4 77 3.04 I@A 

2 -4.16" 

*Slgnflcant at the .05 level

2 I. 02 

TABLE 97 


Means, 

Beta IQ Scores of AEESC CI ents Categorized by Education 

for 


Beta 


Mean 

0 4 years 80 84 13 31 49 

5 8 years 82 94 14 46 325 

9 12 years 86.97 13 05 1223 

13 or more 93 O0 12 80 25 

3 3 16" 4 55* 

2 3 

4 3 18" 3 75* 2 33* 


TABLE 98 


Means, 

Gates Readlng Test Scores of AEESC Clents Categorized by Education 

for 

Reading Test Gates Reading Test Number of 

Gates 


Mean 

0 4 years 3.65 2 45 46 

5 8 years 4 76 2 45 331 

9 12 years 5.96 2 77 1249 

13 or more 8 32 3 09 25 

2 2.87* 

3 6 24* 7.71" 

2 3 

4 6 52* 5 63* 3 78* 


TABLE 99 


Means, 

Arithmetic Level Scores of AEESC C lents Categorlzed by Education 

for 

Level 

Arthmetlc 

Mean 

Level 

Arlthmetlc 

Deviation 

Standard 

of 

Number 

ons 

Observat 

0 4 .years 3 O0 1.40 50 

5 8 years 4 07 4.56 335 

9 12 years 5 36 3 O0 1247 

13 or more 6 92 2.38 25 

3.35* 

10 95* 4 91" 

2 3 

7.61" 5.31" 3 23* 

*Slgnlfcant at the 05 level

Atlanta Employment Evaluation and Service Center 

Personal Data Sheet 

No. 1 4. Team No. 

Card 

7) (co 8-9) 

(cc 

2. Center No. 

(cc 1-6) 

Date of Referral 

5. 

10-15) 

(cc 

Disability Code by Referral Agent" (cc 16-21) (mo.) (day) (year) 

County Code" 

City 

26-28) 

(cc 

Referring Agency 

7. 

22-25) 

(cc 

of Birth. 

Date 

29-34) (cc 

(day) 

(mo) 

Age: (cc 35) 11. Race. (cc 36) 12 Marital Status. (cc 37) 

16- 20 

__(1) 

21- 25 

(2) 

26- 30 

(3) 

31- 35 

__(4) 

36- 40 

__(5) 

41- 50 

__(6) 

51- 54 

__(7) 

55- 64 

__(8) 

(9) 65 and over 

__(I) 

__(2) 

__(3) 

vV-h lte 

Negro 

Amerlcan 

Indlan 

__(4) Oriental 

__(5) Other 

Single 

__(1) 

Marmed 

__(2) 

Widowed 

__(3) 

Dvorced 

__(4) 

__(5) Separated 

Sex: (cc 38) 14. Education (cc 39) 15 Client Assignment. (cc 40) 

___(i) Male 

__(2) Female 

Model Cities Clients: (cc 41) 

Adair Park 

__(I) 

Grant Park 

(2) 

Mechamcsvflle 

__(3) 

Peop]etown 

__(4) 

Pttsburgh 

__(5) 

Summerhll 

__(6) 

0 4 years 

__(i) 

5 8 years 

__(2) 

9 12 years 

__(3) 

13 or more 

__,(4) 

Asslgned TOWER 

__(I) 

Assigned Workshop 

__(2) 

__(3) Combnatlon

Employment Evaluatlon and Service Center 

Atlanta 

Data Sheet 

Counseling 

1 Page 

Data 

Center 

Name: ii. Type of training facility: (cc 20) 

Center Number: 

Card Number: 2 (cc 7) 

Team Number: (cc 8-9) 

cost of evaluation to nearest dollar: 

Total 

10-12) 

(cc 

of weeks, admlsslon to closure 

Number 

13-14) 

(cc 

Number of weeks in 

(cc 15-16) 

evaluation. 

Remedial Education (cc 17) 

.___not referred, high school graduate 

(i) 

not referred, other reasons 

(2) 

referred, but did not attend 

(3) 

reason) 

(any 

Accepted 

but did not take GED 

(4) 

__.__took GED, did not pass 

(5) 

.____took GED, and passed 

(6) 

Potential for training: (cc 13) 

.___not recommended, already trained 

(I) 

.___not recommended, no training 

(2) 

ectlve 

obj 

recommended, but did not under- 

(3) 

training (any reason) 

take 

____recommended, did not complete 

(4) 

____training completed, but not 

(5) 

in related employment 

placed 

___._training and related placement 

(6) 

achieved 

(7) other 

of training program: 

Type 

__clerlcal 

(i) 

__buildlng trades 

(2) 

__industrlal trades 

(3) 

.___automotive trades 

(4) 

.____medical support 

(5) 

(cc 19) 

__dld not enter training 

(I) 

___AEESC training 

(2) 

__MDTA training 

(3) 

__City, County, or State Facility 

(4) 

___EOA sponsored tralnlng 

(5) 

_____private facility 

(6) 

__GRC or other VR facility 

(7) 

__college education 

(8) 

(9) other 

12. TOWER Referral-(cc 21) 

13. 

14. 

service trades 

(6) 

__sewing 

(7) 

client not referred to TOWER 

(i) 

referred but not evaluated 

(2) 

____brief evaluation, statement only 

(3) 

full evaluation 

(4) 

(5) other 

reason for Workshop referral: 

Primary 

22) 

(cc 

___not referred 

(1) 

__less than one week in Workshop 

(2) 

in Work Adjustment 

Chent 

because of lack of work 

(3) 

experience 

___because of physical problems 

(4) 

work 

in 

because of retardation 

(5) 

because of emotlonal or 

(6) 

problems 

actlng-out 

___no particular objective 

(7) 

other 

(8) 

was involved in which project: 

Client 

23) 

(cc 

Aging Project 

(I) 

Welfare Pro] ect 

(2) 

Mental Health Project 

(3) 

___Mental Retardation Project 

(4) 

____General Program 

(5) 

MDTA Program 

(6) 

ACEP Program 

(7) 

other 

(8) 

__cashiering and sales 

(8) 

other 

(9)

VR RELATED SERVICES 

V. R. Referral: (cc 24) 

Employment Evaluation and Service Center 

Atlanta 

Data Sheet 

Counseling 

referred by outside VR 

(I) 

referred other, found to be on VR 

(2) 

(3) 

(4) 

caseload 

to Center VR, accepted 

referred 

services 

for 

to Center VR, not accepted 

referred 

other VR, accepted for 

referred 

servlces 

referred other VR, not accepted 

(6) 

other or non-apphcable 

(7) 

2 Page 

Data VR 

Medical services other than General 

19. 

Exam (do not include dental, 

Medical 

v, sual, psychiatric services) (cc 28) 

__provided by VR prior to referral 

(i) 

___._no services recommended 

(2) 

medical services recommended 

Further 

but not obtained 

(3) 

__obta,ned through source other 

(4) 

VR than 

__obtained by VR 

(5) 

othe 

(6) 

16. rhat is clients' pmmary dlsablhty? (cc 25) 20. Dental IWo-k (cc 29) 

___no primary disability 

(I) 

____mental retardation 

(2) 

emotional disturbance 

(3) 

Dsablhty 

Physical 

dental condtlon 

(4) 

visual problem 

(5) 

__all other physical problems 

(6) 

.___not known 

(7) 

is client's secondary disability: 

Vnat 

6) 

(cc 

no secondary disability 

(i) 

_.__mental retardation 

(2) 

___emotional disturbance 

(3) 

Physical 

_.__dental condition 

(4) 

_.__visual problem 

(5) 

__all other physlcal problems 

(6) 

__._not known 

(7) 

Visual Correction: (cc 27) 

__provided by VR prior to referral 

(i) 

___no significant visual correction 

(2) 

necessary 

Correction Recommended 

Visual 

_____but not obtained 

(3) 

__obtained from source other than VR 

(4) 

obtalned through VR 

(5) 

__other 

(6) 

__prowded by VR prior to referral 

(i) 

no dental serwces recommended 

(2) 

work recommended on Medical 

Dental 

but not obtained 

(3) 

obtained from source other 

(4) 

VR than 

obtained through VR 

(5) 

__other or non-apphcable 

(6) 

21. Psychlatmc Examination- (cc 30) 

__prowded by any source prior 

(i) 

referral 

to 

___no psychiatric considered 

(2) 

necessary 

considered necessary, but not 

(3) 

purchased 

____exam purchased, no therapy 

(4) 

exam purchased, subsequent 

(5) 

therapy 

other 

(6) 

Amount 

Individual Psychological Evaluation 

22. 

31) (cc 

__.provided by any source prior 

(i) 

referral 

to 

__no psychological purchased 

(2) 

__._.psychological purchased by 

(3) 

counselor 

Center 

_____psychological purchased by 

(4) 

counselor 

VR 

___other 

(5) 

Amount


Atlanta 

Data 

Counseling 

Counselor's Recommendation at Staffing: 

23. 

32) (cc 

(1) 

(2) 

(3) 

(4) 

(5) 

(6) 

(7) 

(8) 

(s) 

____tralnlng 

employment 

immedlate 

servlces prior to employment 

further 

workshop 

sheltered 

to prior lob 

return 

employed at tme of staffing 

____chent 

ndeflmtely nterrupted 

____placement 

considered unemployable 

__chent 

other 

of Evaluation at Dscharge: 

Result 

33) (cc 

____comprehensive evaluation wth 

(1) 

summary 

___brief (two-three weeks evaluation 

(2) 

report 

with 

__ncomplete evaluation, but 

(3) 

ectve achieved 

ob] 

.___incomplete, not motzvated, or 

(4) 

problems 

financial 

__incomplete, crcumstances intervened 

(5) 

__._ncomplete, client left early for employ- 

(6) 

ment 

___incomplete, original health problem 

(7) 

prevented continuance 

25. Reason for closure: (cc 34) 

Status 8, "employed" 

(i) 

10A, "unemployable" 

Status 

I0, "Closed Other" 

Status 

___chent moved unable to contact 

(3) 

_____prevahng cnrcumstances prevented 

(4) 

indefnltely delayed employment 

or 

___..physical, mental, emotional, family 

(5) 

too serious from chent's 

problems 

vewpont 

.___client otherwise unmotivated 

(6) 

26. Level of Employment at Closure: (cc 35) 

(1) 

(2) 

(3) 

(4) 

(S) 

mdustrlal or construction 

unsklled 

domestic 

home 

service other than household 

unskilled 

operator, sem-sklled 

industrial 

other seml-sk111ed 

3 Page 

Data 

Closure 

Status 8 Closures, Weekly 

27. 

(cc 36) 

Earnings- 

28. 

29. 

30. 

0 39 

(1) 

40- 49 

(2) 

50- 59 

(3) 

60- 69 

(4) 

70- 79 

(5) 

80- 99 

(6) 

100- ll9 

(7) 

120- above 

(8) 

(9) housewife 

Monthly Income 

Family 

at closure) 

(approxlmately 

(cc 37) 

0- too 

(l) 

100- 149 

(2) 

lSO- 199 

(3) 

200- 249 

(4) 

250- 299 

(5) 

300- 349 

(6) 

350- 399 

(7) 

400- above 

(8) 

(9) not known 

client receiving pubhc 

Is 

at closure: (cc 38) 

assistance 

___AD 

(I) 

AFDC 

(2) 

GA 

(3) 

AB 

(4) 

.___.asslstance, type not known, 

(5) 

not sure 

or 

(6) no asslstance 

Code for Occupation 

D.O.T. 

Closure: (cc 39-44) 

at 

skllled worker 

(6) 

clemcal 

(7) 

__professional, technical, 

(8) 

managerial 

(9) other

1 Name 

Card No 3 

3 

7) -(cc 

5. No. Days Present- 

6 No Hours Present 

8 

28) 

(cc 

9 

29) 

(cc 

10. 

30) 

(cc 

11. 

31) (cc 

12 

32) (cc 


(cc 21-22) 

(cc 23-25) 

Work Adjustment 

2 Center No 

(cc 1-6) 

Date Asslgned to Work Adjustment 

!.,. 

,,.l 

7 No Days Abset 

Personal Charactemstlcs (Key Below) 

w±th Tools 13. 

Dexterzty 

33) (cc Resourcefulnes s 

__14. Cooperatlveness 

Endurance 

34) 

(cc 

n Work __15. Personal Hygiene 

Neatness 

35) 

(cc 

[,, 

-- 

(cc 26-27) 

16. 

Punctuahty 

3 6) (cc Re!atlonshp/Fellowworkers 

(Motzvaton) 17 

Amblton 

37) (cc Relatlons h upemor s 

zp/S 

Key for Comletln. g Items 8 !7 

Apphcable 0 

Not 

1 

Supemor 

Average 2 

Above 

3 

Average 

Average 4 

Below 

5 

Infemor 

18. Rehablhtaton Prognos_s 

___(I) Excellent 

__(2) Guarde4 

___(3) Poor 

(cc 38) 

(cc 15-20)

1. Name: 

Card No: 4 

3. 

7) (cc 

5. No Days Present 

7. No. Days Absent: 

Personal Characteristics" 

(28) 

(29) 

(30) 

(3I) 

(32) 

(33) 

(34) 

(35) 

(36) 

(37) 


(cc 21-22) 

(cc 26-27) 

8 Dexterity with tools 

9. Endurance 

10. Neatness in work 

ii. Punctuality 

12. Ambition (motivation) 

13. Resourcefulness 

14. Cooperatlvenes s 

15. Personal hygiene 

16. 

17. 

Work Potential 

Center No 

4 Date Assigned to TOWER 

From" 

Relationship/Fellow workers 

Relationship/Supervisors 

(cc 1-6) 

(cc 9-14) (cc 15-20) 

6. No. Hours Present. 

(cc 23-25) 

Key for Completing Items 8-31 

Applicable 0 

Not 

1 

Superior 

Average 2 

Above 

3 

Average 

Average 4 

Below 

5 

Inferior

Vocational Aptitudes- 

(38) 

18. Clerical 

Drafting 

__19. 

(39) 

(40) 

20. Drawing 

Electronics Assembly 

__21. 

(41) 

(42) 

(43) 

(44) 

(45) 

(46) 

(47) 

(48) 

(49) 

(5O) 

(51) 

22. Jewelry Manufacturing 

23 Leathergoods Manufacturing 

24. Letterlng 

25. Mall Clerk 

26. Sewing Machine 

27. Cosmetology 

28. Workshop Assembly 

29. Machine Woodworking 

30. Mechanical Comprehension 

31. Basic Skills 

Prediction or Recommendation: 

Vocational Course or OJT: 35. Adjustment Training: 

34 

64) (i) Yes 

(cc 65) 

(cc 

No (2) 

Prognos is 

Rehabilitation 

(I) Excellent 

(I) Yes 

67) (2) No 

(cc 

Guarded 

(2) 

(3) Poor 

58-63) 

(cc 

Potential 

66) 

(cc 

(I) 

(2)

1 Name: 

2 Center No. 

Card No" 5 

3. 

7) (cc 


Atlanta 

a s ework 

G 

(cc I-6) 

4 Number of Persons in Household. 

(cc 9-i0) 

of Household. 

Head 

II) (cc 

Yes 

__(i) 

__(2) No 

6. Number of Dependents. 

(cc 12-13) 

7. Income at Acceptance: 

(cc 14-16) 

Ghent Recewng Public Assist- 

Was 

at Referral" 

ance 

17) __(I) Yes 

(cc 

No 

(2) 

Unemployed, for How Long? 

If 

18) 10. 

(cc 

0-4 weeks 

__(1) 

5-8 weeks 

__(2) 

9-16 weeks 

__(3) 

17-26 weeks 

__(4) 

27-52 weeks 

__(5) 

53 weeks or more 

__(6) 

Never worked 

__(7) 

Unknown 

(8) 

__(9) Concurrent employment 

11 Crmxnal Record" 

12. 

13. 

14 

(cc ?0) 

) 

(3) 

(4) 

__(6) 

None 

no convlctlons 

Arrests, 

conviction 

Msdemeanor 

felonles 

Property 

nvolvng another 

Felomes 

person 

Other undetermined 

Workers Cmtlcal Rating of 

Social 

Vocational Potential 

Client's 

21) (cc 

Excellent 

__(1) 

Guarded 

__(2) 

Poor 

__(3) 

Referred. 

Closed 

22) 

(cc 

__(1) 

__(2) 

__(3) 

__(4) 

__(s) 

__(6) 

B. M. Number 

I. 

23-30) 

(cc 

fnanclally able 

Not 

from defined serwces 

Moved 

area 

not comply wth routines 

Dd 

not appear to benefit from 

Dd 

servlces 

problem 

Famlly 

Employed 

Level of Employment or 

Predominant 

Level Maintained. 

Last 

19) (cc 

__(1) 

(2) 

(3) 

(4) 

(5) 

(6) 

() 

(e) 

(9) 

lndustmal or 

Unskilled 

construction 

agriculture 

Unskilled 

domestic 

Home 

service other than 

UnskAled 

household 

operator, semi-skilled 

Industrml 

semi-skilled 

Other 

worker 

Skilled 

Clerical 

Other- Undetermined

1. Name: 

Card No. 6 

3. 

7) (cc 


Gates Reading Level: '(cc 12-13) 

Psychology 

WAIS: 

7. 

Verbal (cc 16-18) 

A 

B. Performance (cc 19-21) 

C. Full Scale (cc 22-24) 

9. Mental Disorders (cc 26) 

Psychotic (500) 

__(I) 

Psychoneurotic (510) 

.___(2) 

11 M.M.P.I. Scale Score: 

12. 

(cc 28-29) 

2-1 

F/M 

L (cc 30-32) 

F (cc 33-35) 

K (cc 36-38) 

(1) (cc 39-41) 

(2) (cc 42-44) 

(3) (cc 45-47) 

Psychlatmc Examination 

Was 

(cc 69) 

Recommended? 

Yes 

__(I) 

No 

__(2) 

13. 

2. Center No: 

4. Beta IQ. 

(cc 9-ii) 

6. Arlthmetlc Level 

10. 

(4) 

(5) 

(6) 

(7) 

(8) 

(9) 

(I0) 

icc 

8 Mental Retardation (cc 25) 

__(1) Mild (530) 

(2) Moderate (532) 

__(3) Severe (534) 

Other Mental Disorders (cc 27) 

__(1) 

__(2) 

__(3) 

Prognosis 

Vocational 

7o) 

(cc 

Excellent 

__(i) 

Guarded 

__(2) 

(3) Poor 

(520) 

Alcoholism 

Addiction (521) 

Drug 

Personality, and 

Character, 

Disorders (522) 

Behavior 

(cc 48-50) 

(cc 51-53) 

(cc 54-56) 

(cc 57-59) 

(cc 60-62) 

(cc 63- 65) 

(cc 66-68) 

Attztude Scale 

14. 

Score: 

(cc 71-72)

I. Name 

2. Center No 

3. Card No- 


Medical Data Sheet 

(1) 

1-6) (2) 

(cc 

7 (cc 7) 

(4) 

Medical Examination (or equivalent) (5) 

R-3 

8) (6) 

(cc 

no R-3 medical 

(I) 

provided by outside physlclan (7) 

(2) 

(3) provided by Center physlclan (8) 

5 Medical disabilities by code numbers 

disabilities 

Major 

dsabllitles 

Moderate 

dsabllitles 

Mnor 

Numbers 11-20 on Page 2) 

(See 

6 Medical Prognosis (cc 9) 

(3) 

excellent 

good 

THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS ARE FOR FEMALES ONLY 

7. Contraceptive Method Used (cc 10) 9. 

____IU D 

(1) 

oral contraceptlve 

(2) 

__other-mechamcal-chemlcal 

(3) 

.___rhythm method 

(4) 

____has had menopause 

(5) 

has had hysterectomy or total 

(6) 

ltlgaton 

____none 

(7) 

(8) ___not known 

chent willing to attend a family planmng 

Is 

(cc 11) 

chmc? 

is practlclng contraceptlon 

(i) 

__contraceptlon not phys ically neces s ary 

(2) 

____yes 

(3) 

no, any circumstances 

(4) 

no, but would under different clrcumstances 

(5) 

___not known 

(6) 

10 

Page 1 of 2 

Male Female 

for llfe, guarded 

good 

vocationally 

for life, poor vocationally 

good 

guarded 

for life, poor 

guarded 

vocationally 

poor 

known, or uncertain 

not 

of chlldren born to client 

Number 

Number 21, Page 2) 

(see 

of children born known to 

Number 

lllegltlmate 

be 

(See Number 22, Page 2)

(Coding of Items on Page 1) 

11 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15 

16. 


Medical Data Sheet 

many dsabhtles are hstedon 

How 

? 

medical 

(cc 12) 

(see #5) 

one (6) slx 

(I) 

two (7) seven or more 

(2) 

three (8) none 

(3) 

four (9) not known 

(4) 

(5) flve 

more than four dsabhtles are 

If 

above, circle the four which 

hsted 

the most slgnlhcant from the 

are 

viewpoint 

rehabhtatlon 

of the four is the most severe 

Whzch 

disability? 

Code Number 

(cc 13, 14, 15) 

of the four s the second most 

]Arhlch 

dlsabllty ? 

severe 

Code Number (cc 16, 17, 18) 

of the four is the third most 

Whlch 

dlsabllty 9 

severe 

Code Number 

(cc 19, 20, 21) 

of the four is the fourth most 

Which 

dlsabhty 9 

severe 

Code Number 

(cc 22, 23, 24) 

What kind of dlsablhty s the 

17. 

serious ? (hsted on cc 13, 

most 

15) (cc 25) 

14, 

___major (3) ___minor 

(1) 

(2) ___moderate (4) ___no dsablhty 

18. 

19. 

20. 

21. 

2 of 2 

Page 

No. 

Case 

knd of dlsabhty s the 

]What 

most serious dlsablhty 

second 

(hsted on cc 16,17,18) (cc 26) 

____major (3) ____mnor 

(I) 

moderate (4) no dls- 

(2) 

ablhty 

knd of dlsablbty is the third 

What 

semous') (listed on 19,20,21) 

most 

(cc 2 7) 

omit #1 (3) mnor 

(1) 

moderate (4) no dis- 

(2) 

abzhty 

klnd of dsablhty s the 

What 

most serious fourth 9 

(listed on cc 22,23,24) (cc 28) 

omit #1 (3) minor 

(1) 

moderate (4) no dis- 

(2) 

abhty 

of children born to client: 

Number 

29-30) Check both columns 

(cc 

one (1) less than 7 

(1) 

two (2) seven 

(2) 

___three (3) __eight 

(3) 

____four (4) __nine 

(4) 

__hve (5) __ten 

(5) 

__sx (6) __eleren 

(6) 

7 or more (7) twelve 

(7) 

no chlldren(8) thlrteen 

(8) 

not known or more 

(9) 

not known 

(9)

Name: 

Sub Test 

Sub Test 

Sub Test 

Sub Test 

Sub Test 

Sub Test 

Sub Test 

Sub Test 

Total Pre. 

No. 8 

Gard 

7) (cc 

Pre-test Scores- 

Atlanta Employment Evaluation and Servlce Center 

le (cc i0-ii) 

(cc 12-13) 

(cc 14-15) 

(cc 16-17) 

(cc 18-19) 

Attitude Scale Scores 

(cc 2 0- 21) 

(cc 22- 23) 

(cc 24-25) 

(cc 26-28) 

2. Center No. 

(cc i-6) 

4. Length of Stay (zn days): 

(cc 8-9) 

6. Post-test Scores 

Sub Test 1 (cc 29-30) 

Sub Test 2 (cc 31-32) 

Sub Test 3. (cc 33-34) 

Sub Test 4. (cc 35-36) 

Sub Test 5. (cc 37-38) 

Sub Test 6. (cc 39-40) 

Sub Test 7. (cc 41-42) 

Sub Test 8. (cc 43-44) 

Total Post (cc 45-47)

Feld 

No 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

0 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

3O 

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

37 

38 

39 

4O 

41 

42 

43 

AEESC SYSTEM TABLE GENERATOR FIELD PARAMETER 

Present 

Cards 

lent Number 

CI 

Number 

Team 

Date 

Referral 

Ity Code 

Dlsabl 

Agency 

Referrlng 

Code 

Cty-County 

of Blrth 

Date 

Age 

Race 

ltal Status 

Mar 

Sex 

Starting 

Length Pos 

Item 

Educatlon 

ent Asslgnment 

C 

Cltles 

Model 

Cost 

of Evaluatlon 

Weeks 

In Weeks Evaluatlon 

Education 

Remedial 

Potent lal 

Tranlng 

of Traln Pgm 

Type 

Facl Ity 

Training 

Referral 

TOWER 

for Wksp Ref 

Rea 

ProJect 

R. Referral 

V 

Dsab Ity 

Prm 

Dsabl ty 

Sec 

Correct on 

Vsual 

Servlce 

Medical 

Dental 

Exam 

Psychlatrc 

logcal Eval 

Psycho 

Recom 

Counselor 

of Eval 

Result 

for Closure 

Reason 

at Closure 

Employment 

Earnlng 

Weekly 

Income 

Famlly 

Assistance 

Publlc 

0 T Code at C los 

D 

Started 

WA/Date 

WA/Date F lnshed 

9 

15 

17 

23 

29 

33 

36 

42 

43 

44 

45 

46 

47 

48 

49 

52 

54 

56 

57 

58 

59 

6O 

61 

62 

63 

64 

65 

66 

67 

68 

69 

7O 

71 

72 

73 

74 

75 

76 

77 

78 

84 

9O 

Page 

No 

O0 

02 

O4 

O5 

06 

07 

O8 

O9 

0 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

05 2 

06 2 

07 2 

08 2 

09 2 

0 

2 

2 

2 

2 

3 

2 

4 

2 

5 

2 

6 

2 

7 

2 

8 

2 

9 

2 

20 2 

221 

2.22 

23 2 

24 2 

25 2 

26 2 

27 2 

2.28 

29 2 

30 2 

3.04 

3 04

Fleld 

No 

44 

45 

46 

47 

48 

49 

5O 

51 

52 

53 

54 

55 

56 

57 

58 

59 

60 

61 

62 

63 

64 

65 

66 

67 

68 

69 

7O 

71 

72 

73 

74 

75 

76 

77 

78 

79 

80 

81 

82 

83 

84 

85 

86 

87 

88 

89 

9O 

91 

Item 

Present 

WA/Days 

Present 

WA/Hours 

Absent 

WA/Days 

Dexterity 

WA 

Endurance 

WA 

Neatness 

WA 

WA 

Punctual ty 

Ambtlon 

WA 

hess 

WA/Resourcefu 

veness 

WA/Cooperat 

Hyg ene 

WA 

Re I/Workers 

WA 

Re /Super ors 

WA 

Rehab Prognosls 

WA 

Ass gned 

T/Date 

Finished 

T/Date 

Present 

T/Days 

Present 

T/Hours 

Present 

T/Days 

T/Dexte r 

ty 

T/Endurance 

T/Neatness 

ty 

T/Punctual 

vat on 

T/Mot 

T/Resourcefulness 

veness 

T/Cooperat 

ene 

T/Hyg 

Workers 

T/Rel 

Superlors 

T/Rel 

er ca 

C 

ng 

Draft 

Drawing 

Ass. 

Electroncs 

ry Mfg 

Jewel 

Gds Mfg 

Leather 

Lettering 

Clerk 

Mall 

Machlne 

Sewing 

Cosmetology 

Assembly 

Wksp 

Woodworking 

Mach 

Comprehenslon 

Mech. 

SkIIs 

Basic 

Job 

Predict 

Job 2 

Predlct 

Train 

Training 

Adj 

al 

Potent 

-:2- 

Length 

Starting 

Postlon 

96 

98 

Ol 

03 

04 

O5 

06 

O7 

O8 

09 

I0 

II 

12 

13 

14 

20 

26 

28 

31 

33 

34 

35 

36 

37 

38 

39 

4O 

41 

42 

43 

44 

45 

46 

47 

48 

49 

50 

51 

52 

53 

54 

55 

56 

57 

63 

69 

7O 

71 

Page 

No 

O5 3 

06 3 

07 3 

3.08 

09 3 

0 

3 

3 

2 

3 

3 

3 

4 

3 

5 

3 

6 

3 

7 

3 

8 

3 

O4 4 

O4 4 

O5 4 

06 4 

O7 4 

08 4 

4.09 

0 

4 

4 

2 4 

3 

4 

4 

4 

5 

4 

6 4 

7 4, 

8 

4 

9 4. 

20 4 

4.21 

22 4 

4.23 

24 4 

4,25 

26 4 

27 4 

4.28 

29 4 

3O 4 

431 

32 4 

33 4 

34 4 

35 4 

4.36

Feld 

No 

92 

93 

94 

95 

96 

97 

)9 

O0 

Ol 

02 

03 

04 

05 

06 

07 

08 

O9 

0 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

2O 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

3O 

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

37 

38 

39 

40 

Item 

Prognos s 

Rehab 

n Hsehold 

Persons 

of Hsehold 

Head 

of Dependents 

No 

at Accept 

Income 

Assist 

Rec/Pub 

Long Unemploy 

How 

Employment 

Level 

Record 

Crlmlnal 

Iona Potent 

Vocat 

Referred 

Closed 

M Number 

B 

Q 

Beta 

Read Level 

Gates 

h Level 

Mal 

Verbal 

WAIS 

Performance 

WAIS 

Full Scale 

WAIS 

ion 

Retardat 

Dsorders 

Mental 

Dlsorders 

Other 

F/M 

MMP 

L 

MMP 

F 

MMP 

K 

MMP 

MMP 

2 

MMP 

3 

MP 

4 

MMP 

5 

MMP 

6 

MMP 

7 

MMP 

8 

MMP 

9 

MMP 

I0 

MMP 

Exam Recomm 

Psych 

Prognos s 

Vocational 

Score 

Attitude 

3 Med Exam 

R- 

Prognoss 

ibd 

Contracept ve 

Llsed 

C nlc Fam/Plan g 

of Dsabllltles 

# 

Severe D lsab 

Most 

Most Severe 

2nd 

Most Severe 

3rd 

Most Severe 

4th 

Ser Dlsabll 

Most 

Most Serlous 

2nd 

-3- 

Length 

8 

3 

2 

2 

3 

3 

3 

2 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

2 

3 

3 

3 

Starting 

t Pos 

72 

73 

75 

76 

78 

81 

82 

83 

84 

85 

86 

87 

95 

98 

200 

202 

2O5 

20 

211 

212 

213 

214 

216 

219 

222 

225 

228 

231 

234 

237 

240 

243 

246 

249 

252 

255 

256 

257 

259 

260 

261 

262 

263 

264 

267 

270 

273 

276 

277 

Page 

No 

37 4 

04 5 

O5 

5 

06 

5 

O7 

5 

5.08 

09 5 

510 

II 5 

515 

513 

514 

6.04 

05 6 

06 6 

07 6 

08 6 

09 6 

0 6 

6 

2 6 

3 6 

4 6 

5 6 

6 

6 

7 6 

8 6 

9 

6 

20 6 

621 

22 6 

23 6 

24 6 

25 6 

26 6 

27 6 

28 6 

29 6 

04 7 

06 7 

07 7 

08 7 

7 

3 

7 

4 7 

5 7 

6 

7 

7 

7 

7 8

Fleld 

No 

41 

42 

43 

44 

45 

46 

47 

48 

49 

5O 

51 

52 

53 

54 

55 

56 

57 

58 

59 

6O 

61 

62 

63 

tem 

Most Serious 

3rd 

Most Serious 

4th 

of Children 

No. 

Children 

llegt 

of Stay 

Length 

Pre-Test 

2 

Pre-Test 

3 

Pre-Test 

4 

Pre-Test 

5 

Pre-Test 

6 

Pre-Test 

7 

Pre-Test 

8 

Pre-Test 

Pre-Test 

Total 

Post-Test 

2 

Post-Test 

3 

Post-Test 

4 

Post-Test 

5 

Post-Test 

6 

Post-Test 

7 

Post-Test 

8 

Post-Test 

Total 

Post-Test 

Length 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

3 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

3 

ng 

Start 

t on 

Pos 

278 

279 

280 

282 

283 

285 

287 

289 

291 

293 

295 

297 

299 

301 

304 

306 

3O8 

310 

312 

314 

316 

318 

320 

Page 

No 

19 7 

20 7 

721 

22 7 

O4 8 

8.05 

8.05 

O5 8 

O5 8 

05 8 

O5 8 

O5 8 

O5 8 

O5 8 

06 8 

O6 8 

8.06 

06 8 

8.06 

O6 8 

8.06 

O6 8 

8 06

(Second Year) - NCRTM

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?