20.07.2013 Views

Development and Permitting Process Improvement Study

Development and Permitting Process Improvement Study

Development and Permitting Process Improvement Study

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Development</strong>. However, as the organization evolves the Mayor may wish to consider<br />

other alternatives for this responsibility. Some communities place this responsibility<br />

to a planning director, a community development director or another city official. It<br />

should also be noted that departments also should have the responsibility to resolve<br />

their differences without the Mayor’s office needing to get involved.<br />

17. Recommendation: Develop a system whereby competing goals can be<br />

resolved during the development review committee process. Below is an<br />

outline for a system that should be followed:<br />

Immediately following the <strong>Development</strong> Review Committee meeting<br />

the project manager should notify the Aide to the Mayor for Economic<br />

<strong>Development</strong> about any conflicting issues.<br />

Within three days the Mayor’s Aide should schedule a meeting with<br />

the directors of the effected departments.<br />

The Mayor’s Aide for Economic <strong>Development</strong> should chair the meeting<br />

of the directors.<br />

The Mayor’s Aide shall be empowered to mediate the issue <strong>and</strong><br />

provide a final resolution or suggest the issue is of such magnitude that<br />

the differences should be exposed to the Planning Commission or City<br />

Council for resolution.<br />

If these two recommendations can be fully implemented, applicants will receive<br />

feedback more quickly on projects <strong>and</strong> competing goals <strong>and</strong> issues can be resolved.<br />

F. STAFF ATTITUDE<br />

A key issue that surfaced repeatedly in the focus groups <strong>and</strong> the customer surveys was<br />

the issue of staff attitudes. Customers would like an attitude of “can we help you.”<br />

Instead, they feel that many staff hide behind the regulations <strong>and</strong> take a negative<br />

attitude. We believe that staff should not view themselves as regulators. Rather, they<br />

should view themselves as problem solvers <strong>and</strong> community builders – building a<br />

better Lincoln in partnership with the applicants. It should be noted that staff must<br />

balance the needs of the applicant with those of the neighbors, <strong>and</strong> the broader<br />

community as represented by the Comprehensive Plan. A positive attitude in relation<br />

to all three is desired.<br />

Some department managers indicate that they have trained their staff to have helpful<br />

attitudes <strong>and</strong> we experienced this with a variety of staff. Building <strong>and</strong> Safety indicate<br />

that they have an annual retreat concerning customer service. However, it takes only<br />

one staff person with a poor attitude to create problems for the entire function. An<br />

important concept in relation to customer service is called “Moments of Truth.” A<br />

Lincoln 22 Zucker Systems

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!