20.07.2013 Views

home entertainment 2007

home entertainment 2007

home entertainment 2007

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

not due to any bass emphasis, or to<br />

changes in speaker position or acoustics,<br />

but to the No.433’s ability to give shape<br />

to sounds that could otherwise be<br />

obscured by what was going on in the<br />

midrange and treble. One result of this<br />

was that the low end of deep voices that<br />

descend to the frequencies where room<br />

modes begin to have their pernicious<br />

effect were not differently colored from<br />

the upper end of their range. The very<br />

lowest bass was equally tight and potent.<br />

It was in the high frequencies that<br />

the No.433 most distinguished itself<br />

from the other amps on hand. The<br />

clarity of its midrange seemed to carry<br />

on up through the highest frequencies<br />

without restriction or loss of resolution.<br />

With the 802Ds, the result was<br />

extremely satisfying—the No.433<br />

opened up the soundstage while taking<br />

nothing from the defining qualities of<br />

the bass and mids. I doubt I would<br />

have made such a determination with<br />

earlier 800-series speakers from B&W,<br />

but the smoothness of the 802D’s diamond<br />

tweeter, particularly as it<br />

approaches the crossover frequency<br />

(4kHz), combined with the No.433 in<br />

a way that was a revelation.<br />

That revelation occurred when I put<br />

on Christoph Eschenbach and the<br />

Philadelphia Orchestra’s new SACD of<br />

Saint-Saëns’ Symphony 3 (see sidebar,<br />

“Recordings in the Round”). From the<br />

very soft beginning, I could hear individual<br />

instrumentalists and “see” exactly<br />

where each was seated. As the forces<br />

gathered, there was no loss of such<br />

specificity or balance, even in tuttis.<br />

Add the organ-pedal tones in the second<br />

movement and, again, there was<br />

an expansion of the tonal and dynamic<br />

palettes, but with no compromise of<br />

the rich detail. I was transported.<br />

The No.433 might seem a bit bright<br />

in direct comparisons with other amps,<br />

but, as I’ve emphasized before, you can’t<br />

make a completely objective determination<br />

of a product’s accuracy with only<br />

subjective tools and no primary references.<br />

With the Pioneer S-1EX speakers<br />

as well, the No.433 created an impression<br />

of transparency and lightness, but it<br />

was as if the otherwise excellent mids<br />

and lows played less of a role in defining<br />

the sound’s character. Perhaps this was<br />

due to the difference between the<br />

B&Ws and the Pioneers’ more highly<br />

damped bass tuning. The Bel Canto<br />

REF1000 monoblocks, despite their<br />

power, had a bit less slam than did the<br />

No.433 with either speaker, but they<br />

provided a remarkably satisfying spectral<br />

MUSIC IN THE ROUND<br />

MY ENTIRE SYSTEM, GOOD AS IT WAS, HAS<br />

BEEN PUSHED ANOTHER STEP FORWARD BY YET<br />

ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF COMPLEMENTARY<br />

ADVANCES IN SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE.<br />

balance with the Pioneers, much as the<br />

Levinson and the Classé CA3200 did<br />

with the 802Ds. I continue to waffle<br />

about whether I preferred the Levinson<br />

or the Classé with the B&Ws. The<br />

Levinson made them sound tighter and<br />

quicker, while the Classé made them<br />

sound a bit more warm and rich. There is<br />

a real difference in price, too: $10,000 for<br />

the Mark Levinson No.433 vs $6000 for<br />

the Classé CA3200. Take a careful look<br />

in your wallet but, given my experience<br />

and my current room acoustics, I’d go for<br />

the Levinson No.433.<br />

Back to Bassics—JL Audio’s<br />

f113 Subwoofer<br />

The arrival of Christoph Eschenbach<br />

and the Philadelphia Orchestra’s spectacular<br />

new SACD of Saint-Saëns’ Symphony<br />

3 drives me to say a bit more<br />

about JL Audio’s Fathom f113 subwoofer<br />

(see “Music in the Round,”<br />

November 2006). Because I listen to<br />

music, not movies, in my main system,<br />

the f113 is not called to duty every day.<br />

If fact, most of my listening is in twochannel<br />

stereo, for which there’s no easy<br />

way to do optimum bass management<br />

in this all-analog system. But after my<br />

first listen to this disc, I got myself off<br />

the couch—I had to hear it with the sub.<br />

The disc is 5.0-channel, so I tried two<br />

ways: 1) I hooked up the f113 in parallel<br />

with the L/R channels and used the<br />

built-in LP filter to roll it in from 40Hz<br />

down. Then, 2) I used the Bel Canto PL-<br />

1A’s bass management to set all of my<br />

speakers to Small. The latter might seem<br />

suboptimal (sorry) because the crossover<br />

to the sub is fixed for all channels at<br />

80Hz, and a lower crossover frequency is<br />

more effective with the B&W 802Ds.<br />

Nonetheless, I greatly preferred that configuration;<br />

in this room, the f113 is a vastly<br />

superior reproducer of low bass than<br />

even the quintet of B&W floorstanders.<br />

In 5.0 channels, the Saint-Saëns was<br />

no less than glorious (see above), and<br />

the organ was powerful, rich, and distinctive<br />

in its colorations. In fact, it was<br />

simply the best-sounding recording of<br />

this piece that I had heard. But, like<br />

Oliver Twist, I wanted more, please,<br />

sir. With the f113 rolling in below<br />

40Hz, there was added authority and<br />

weight in some, though not all, of the<br />

organ-pedal passages. It was thrilling,<br />

but not all that different from the<br />

unaugmented 5.0 sound.<br />

With the invocation of bass management,<br />

with which I passed the low end<br />

over to the f113 below 80Hz, there<br />

seemed to be a dramatic expansion of<br />

the entire soundstage and an increased<br />

definition of the extreme bass, to go<br />

along with the enhancements noted<br />

above. At several points in the second<br />

movement I could barely hear the<br />

organ, but I could feel it through my<br />

feet—and this in a steel-reinforced concrete<br />

building. Who knows what others<br />

in the building might have thought<br />

was going on?<br />

Why was this so? I think there are<br />

two reasons. First, the f113 is simply<br />

capable of more output with less distortion<br />

below 40Hz. Second, the f113<br />

is equalized to be more linear in this<br />

region. I didn’t measure the B&W<br />

802Ds, but if the unequalized f113<br />

showed a highly irregular response in<br />

this room, odds are that the 802Ds,<br />

positioned as they were for maximal<br />

imaging and midrange smoothness,<br />

probably had a low-end response that<br />

looked like a view of the Alps. Bass<br />

management simply deleted this and<br />

passed along those frequencies to the<br />

equalized and powerful f113. The<br />

result? My entire system, good as it<br />

was, has been pushed another step forward<br />

by yet another example of complementary<br />

advances in software and<br />

hardware. Now I need to rethink all of<br />

my connections to permit better and<br />

more frequent use of the JL Audio<br />

Fathom f113…<br />

Next Time in the Round<br />

Having distributed my Stereophile card<br />

to many prospects at the <strong>2007</strong> Consumer<br />

Electronics Show, I hope lots of<br />

juicy stuff will soon arrive. The Audio<br />

Research MP-1 and the Cary Audio<br />

Cinema 11 pre-pros are next in the<br />

queue, along with some more discussion<br />

of equalization. As for recordings,<br />

the spate of multichannel SACDs continues.<br />

See you in July. ■■<br />

www.Stereophile.com, May <strong>2007</strong> 43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!