Gerald Massey's Lectures - Society in evolution - Awardspace
Gerald Massey's Lectures - Society in evolution - Awardspace
Gerald Massey's Lectures - Society in evolution - Awardspace
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
simplicity. That significance which the esoteric mis<strong>in</strong>terpreters try to read <strong>in</strong>to it was not<br />
<strong>in</strong> the nature of it orig<strong>in</strong>ally--always except<strong>in</strong>g the phenomena of Spiritualism. There is a<br />
regular manufacture of the old masters carried on by impostors <strong>in</strong> Rome. The modern<br />
manufacture of ancient mysteries is just as great an imposition, and equally sure to be<br />
found out. Do not suppose I am say<strong>in</strong>g this, or wag<strong>in</strong>g war, on behalf of the mysteries<br />
called Christian, for I look upon them as the greatest imposition of all. Rome was the<br />
manufactory of old masters 1800 years ago. I am opposed to all man-made mystery, and<br />
all k<strong>in</strong>ds of false belief. The battle of truth and error is not to be darkly fought now-adays<br />
beh<strong>in</strong>d the mask of secrecy. Darkness gives all its advantage to error; day light alone<br />
is <strong>in</strong> favour of truth! Nature is full of mystery; and we are here to make out the mysteries<br />
of Nature and draw them <strong>in</strong>to day-light, not to cultivate and keep veiled the mysteries<br />
made by man <strong>in</strong> the day of his need or the night of his past. We want to have done with<br />
the mask of mystery and all the devious devilries of its double-facedness, so that we may<br />
look fully and squarely <strong>in</strong>to the face of Nature for ourselves, whether <strong>in</strong> the past, present,<br />
or future. Mystery has been called the mother of abom<strong>in</strong>ations, but the abom<strong>in</strong>ations<br />
themselves are the superstitions, the rites and ceremonies, the dogmas, doctr<strong>in</strong>es, delusive<br />
idealisms, and unjust laws that have been falsely founded on the ancient mysteries by<br />
ignorant literalisation and esoteric mis<strong>in</strong>terpretation!<br />
NOTE TO LECTURE ON "PAUL"<br />
In quot<strong>in</strong>g evidence of the double doctr<strong>in</strong>e ascribed to Paul, I omitted one of the most<br />
conclusive illustrations of the fact. We read <strong>in</strong> Galatians iii. 13--"Christ hath redeemed us<br />
from the Curse of the Law, be<strong>in</strong>g made a Curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every<br />
one that hangeth on a Tree." The object of hang<strong>in</strong>g the Condemned One on the tree was<br />
to make him Accursed. But what says the voice of Paul the Gnostic <strong>in</strong> another text (Cor.<br />
xii. 3)?--"No man speak<strong>in</strong>g by the Spirit of God calleth Jesus Accursed, and no man can<br />
say that Jesus is the Lord but by the Holy Spirit." That is, the Christ of the Gnosis could<br />
not become accursed, could not be hung upon a tree, and no Gnostic would say that Jesus<br />
was the KURIOS save <strong>in</strong> the mystical or esoteric sense. Here the Historic and Gnostic<br />
doctr<strong>in</strong>es are directly antipodal. This aga<strong>in</strong> is the teach<strong>in</strong>g of Paul--"Say not <strong>in</strong> thy heart,<br />
Who shall ascend <strong>in</strong>to Heaven? (that is, to br<strong>in</strong>g Christ down;) or, Who shall descend<br />
<strong>in</strong>to the abyss? (that is, to br<strong>in</strong>g Christ up from the Dead.) The Word is nigh thee, <strong>in</strong> thy<br />
mouth, and <strong>in</strong> thy heart." That is, the Word as preached by Paul. Then follows the<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpolation. Also, as an illustration of the statement made by Clement Alexander--that<br />
Paul said he would br<strong>in</strong>g the Gnosis or Hidden Wisdom to the Brethren <strong>in</strong> Rome--it<br />
should have been shown by me that the teach<strong>in</strong>g of the Epistle (ch. i. 23-32) is taken<br />
almost bodily and repeated nearly verbatim from ch. xiv. 12-31 of the "Wisdom of<br />
Solomon."<br />
THE KARAST=CHRIST OR MUMMY-TYPE OF IMMORTALITY.<br />
The Karast, which I claim to be the Egyptian orig<strong>in</strong>al of the Greek Christ, was an image<br />
of ris<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong>--a representative of the resurrection; and <strong>in</strong> speak<strong>in</strong>g of this symbol I<br />
ought to have po<strong>in</strong>ted to the fact that the alleged historic resurrection of Jesus has never<br />
yet been found pourtrayed on the so-called early Christian Monuments, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g those<br />
discovered <strong>in</strong> the Roman Catacombs. But what do we f<strong>in</strong>d there <strong>in</strong> place of the miss<strong>in</strong>g<br />
fact? The scene of Lazarus be<strong>in</strong>g raised from the dead. This is depicted over and over<br />
aga<strong>in</strong> as the typical resurrection where there is no real one! Christ of Egypt reproduced <strong>in</strong><br />
Rome like the other Mythical types perpetuated there by Gnostic Art. As the image is