21.07.2013 Views

Gerald Massey's Lectures - Society in evolution - Awardspace

Gerald Massey's Lectures - Society in evolution - Awardspace

Gerald Massey's Lectures - Society in evolution - Awardspace

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

on the third day follow<strong>in</strong>g the crucifixion. In the Acts he is not "taken up" <strong>in</strong>to Heaven<br />

until the fortieth day, or after forty days! Such serious discrepancies as these are forever<br />

irreconcilable as history, but they are found to conta<strong>in</strong> the very facts that reconstitute the<br />

Mythos.<br />

The resurrection of Osiris at the Autumn equ<strong>in</strong>ox was lunar; at the vernal equ<strong>in</strong>ox it was<br />

solar. After he was betrayed to his death, when the sun was <strong>in</strong> the sign of Scorpio, he rose<br />

aga<strong>in</strong> on the third day as Lord of Light <strong>in</strong> the moon, or as Horus, the child of the mothermoon.<br />

The solar resurrection was at the vernal equ<strong>in</strong>ox when the sun entered the first of<br />

the upper signs and Orion rose. This time it was <strong>in</strong> the character of the second Horus, the<br />

adult of 30 years; and this second resurrection followed the forty days of mourn<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

the suffer<strong>in</strong>g God which were celebrated <strong>in</strong> the Mysteries, and survive <strong>in</strong> a Christianized<br />

form as our Lent. And just as the myth of the double Horus <strong>in</strong> the two characters of the<br />

child of 12 years, and the adult Horus of 30 years, has been cont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>in</strong> the Gospels to<br />

furnish the two phases <strong>in</strong> the life of Jesus, so have the two different resurrections with<br />

their correct dates been applied to the Christ made historical.<br />

Thus <strong>in</strong>terpreted by means of the Mythos these two versions of one alleged fact tend to<br />

corroborate my explanation already made that the two different dates for the crucifixion<br />

given <strong>in</strong> the otherwise irreconcilable accounts belong to the luni-solar reckon<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the<br />

same luni-solar myth. In Egyptian the signs of a half-moon and fourteen days are<br />

identical; and <strong>in</strong> the dark half of the moon Osiris was torn <strong>in</strong>to fourteen parts. Therefore<br />

the 14th of the lunar month was the day of full moon. Whereas <strong>in</strong> the soli-lunar month of<br />

thirty days the 15th was the middle of the month. Now the crucifixion or the cross<strong>in</strong>g at<br />

Easter was and still is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the day of full moon. This will be on the 14th of the<br />

month of twenty-eight days <strong>in</strong> the reckon<strong>in</strong>g by the moon only, but on the 15th of the<br />

month accord<strong>in</strong>g to the soli-lunar reckon<strong>in</strong>g. The 14th of the month would be the lunar<br />

reckon<strong>in</strong>g of Anup = John, and the 15th that of Taht-Mati = Mathew <strong>in</strong> the two forms of<br />

the Egyptian Mythos. Both reckon<strong>in</strong>gs were extant <strong>in</strong> two different cults and both were<br />

separately cont<strong>in</strong>ued by the Eastern and Western Churches for the one day of the<br />

crucifixion. Both cannot be historically correct, but they are both astronomically true.<br />

Both could be made to meet at a given po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> the total comb<strong>in</strong>ation which was<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the conjunction of the sun and moon at the equ<strong>in</strong>ox as the day of full<br />

moon. But the two different dates for the mid-month rema<strong>in</strong>ed, and these are represented<br />

by the traditions of two different dates for the crucifixion. Both the lunar and the solar<br />

dates could be utilised by the Mythos, <strong>in</strong> which there were two crucifixions and two<br />

resurrections, though these will bear witness for the s<strong>in</strong>gle fact of the historical<br />

crucifixion. As we have seen, the two ascensions of Osiris on the third day and at the end<br />

of forty days, have been preserved, and are repeated as historical transactions. Two<br />

different Crosses were also conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the Christian Iconography as the cross of<br />

Autumn and of Easter; and although we may not be able to show two crucifixions <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Canonical Gospels, nevertheless the total matter of the Mythos is there. When Jesus was<br />

led up <strong>in</strong>to the wilderness to be tempted of the devil, and to suffer dur<strong>in</strong>g forty days, we<br />

have the parallel to the struggle between Osiris and Sut, which was celebrated dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

forty days of mourn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the mysteries. Moreover, there were two days of death or<br />

crucifixion kept <strong>in</strong> Rome until the present century, when the dead Christ used to be laid<br />

out and exhibited on the Thursday before Good Friday; and two days of resurrection were<br />

also celebrated <strong>in</strong> the two Sabbaths on Saturday and Sunday. As the Apostolic<br />

Constitutions show, both of these days were cont<strong>in</strong>ued for the two weekly holidays of the<br />

Christians, Saturday be<strong>in</strong>g the day of ris<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong> on the 7th day of the week <strong>in</strong> the lunar<br />

cult; Sunday, the Sabbath of the 8th day, accord<strong>in</strong>g to the solar resurrection. Such are the<br />

fundamental facts; and, to my th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g, they are of sufficient force to cleave the<br />

Canonical history right <strong>in</strong> two, each half be<strong>in</strong>g then claimed by the Mythos. Here, as<br />

elsewhere, the Mythos does expla<strong>in</strong> the fact, but only by abolish<strong>in</strong>g the history. From

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!