22.07.2013 Views

William Stratton Ph.D. Thesis - MINDS@UW Home

William Stratton Ph.D. Thesis - MINDS@UW Home

William Stratton Ph.D. Thesis - MINDS@UW Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

z<br />

x<br />

y<br />

Figure 2.4: The unit sphere representation of Ahkl for an Al crystal for: a 1.0 nm (a) 3.0 nm (b) at<br />

a {111} reflection and a 1.0 nm (c) and 3.0 nm (d) at a {220} reflection. The great circle ribbons<br />

(shown in white) correspond to intersections with the respective planes, and their width is Δθ. As<br />

seen, smaller crystals will have thicker great circle ribbons and therefore larger Ahkl values.<br />

Figure from 87 .<br />

Equation (2.24) in Figure 2.5 for different families of reflections of a cubic crystal. The<br />

discrepancy only becomes significant for Δθ > 0.15 radians, which occurs only for the smallest<br />

crystals we consider (d ~ 1 nm).<br />

Though the shape function, Ahkl is a function of one of our sample parameters d. To<br />

highlight this dependence, we introduce the Bragg active fraction constant, Chkl. Since, for small<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!