v - MSpace at the University of Manitoba

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$il\VOLVEMENT OF RETII\OIC ACID II{ - MSpace at the University of ...$

Table 1. Chemical composition of seed and meal samples deived h m yellow- and brown- seeded Bmssica species SpeciedComponent Seed coat color Brw*c&l rqM1 Oil (% DM, full fat basis) Cnide protein (% DM, fat free basis) Cnide fiber (% DM, fat free basis) B&cu species ' (% DM, fat fiee basis) Sucrose Oligosaccharides Total fiber Crude protein Ash Fat Yellow Brown ' Stringam et ai., 1974; * Included yellow- and brown-seeded B. napus, B. ropa, B. juncea and B. carinuta canoldrapeseed, Simbaya et ai., 1995.
1.1.3. Quality Characteristies of Yellow-seeded Canola/Rapeseed In recent years, several studies have focused on dietary fiber, carbohydrates, protein and amino acids content of yellow-seeded canoldrapeseed with the objective of exploring any advantage of yellow-seeded type over its brown-seeded counterpart. It is apparent that dietary fiber, carbohydrates, protein and amino acids are key quality characteristics of fbture canola meal. 1.1.3.1. Dietary Fiber Dietary fiber is used to describe a variety of plant polysaccharides which are not digested by the alimentary enzymes of man. It is composed of cellulose, hernicellulose, pectins, gums, oligosaccharides and lignin (Trowell et al., 1976). Among the methods used to measure fiber content are crude fiber (CF; AOAC, 1990), acid detergent fiber (ADF; AOAC, 1990), neutral detergent fiber (NDF; AOAC, 1 WO), non-starch polysaccharide (NSP; Englyst and Cummings, 1984; Englyst and Cummings, 1988; SloMnski and Campbell, 1990) and total dietary fiber (DF). The components of plant ceIl wall polyrners analysed by these methods are show in Table 2. The content and composition of dietary fiber of yellow- and brown-seeded canola is shown in Table 3. Yellow-seeded canola contained less neutral detergent fiber (NDF) than the brown- seeded type. This is in agreement with the report of lower NDF (2 1.9 % vs 23.6 %), ADF (13.4 % vs 17.7 %) and CF (6.3 % vs 8.1 %) contents in yellow-seeded canola (rapeseed) as compared to the brown- seeded type (Bell and Shires, 1982). The total dietary fiber, lignin and polyphenol contents ofyellow- seeded B. ropa canola were lower than those ofbrown-seeded B. napus amples, while the non-star& polysaccharide (NSP) value for yellow-seeded type was higher than that of the brown-seedcd type. It should be pointed out that, although the total non-starch polysaccharide content of yellow-ded
Page 1 and 2: CHEMICAL COMPOSlTlON AND NUTRlTLVE
Page 3 and 4: THE UNIVERSI'IY OF MANITOBA FACULTY
Page 5 and 6: ABSTRACT Part A: Chernical Composit
Page 7 and 8: 2882 kcavkg, respectively) and show
Page 9 and 10: ............................... 1 2
Page 11 and 12: TABLE 1. TABLE 2. TABLE 3. TABLE 4.
Page 13 and 14: of Siqis dbu mucilage isolate (mg/g
Page 15 and 16: 1. LITERATURE REVIEW 1.1. Part A: Y
Page 17: esearch on yellow-seeded canola has
Page 21 and 22: Table 3. Composition of dietary fib
Page 23 and 24: detergent fiber, acid detergent fib
Page 25 and 26: 113.2 Carbohydrates The carbohydrat
Page 27 and 28: quality, the results of in vitro pr
Page 29 and 30: oiier chickens was obsened although
Page 31 and 32: Table 7. Chernical Composition of C
Page 33 and 34: apesedcanola, age of animals, proce
Page 35 and 36: 2. Manuscnpt One Chernical Composit
Page 37 and 38: evaluation has shown yellow-seeded
Page 39 and 40: y gas-liquid chromatography accordi
Page 41 and 42: Table 8. Composition and calculatec
Page 43 and 44: studies (Simbaya et al., 1995), alt
Page 45 and 46: polyphenols, cell wall protein and
Page 47 and 48: Table 12. Amino acid composition of
Page 49 and 50: Table 13. Phosphorus content of mea
Page 51 and 52: yellow-seeded samples. In general,
Page 53 and 54: 2-4, CONCLUSIONS 1. Detailed chemic
Page 55 and 56: 3.1. INTRODUCTION The Sincgis aibu
Page 57 and 58: were f?om Quest Internat ional Irel
Page 59 and 60: added and the mixture wu boiled for
Page 61 and 62: Table 16. Composition and Caiculate
Page 63 and 64: ground in a coffa grinder and poole
Page 65 and 66: pre-treatment of the sample with &S
Page 67 and 68: Table 19. Effect of H,SO, concentra
Page 69 and 70:
Table 20. Screening for Mucilage De
Page 71 and 72:
Table 22. The effect of enzyme conc
Page 73 and 74:
Table 23. The effect of micronizati
Page 75 and 76:
content. It is a weU known fact tha
Page 77 and 78:
Table 25. Effect of grinding on TME
Page 79 and 80:
4. REFERENCES Andrews RR. and N.A.
Page 81 and 82:
1585.75 Englyst H. and J.H. Cummin&
Page 83 and 84:
Marquardt, RR, 1997. Enzyme enhance
Page 85 and 86:
and in vivo studies. Anim. Feed Sci
Page 87:
canola and soybean on the bioavaiia
show all

v - MSpace at the University of Manitoba

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?