23.07.2013 Views

PDF - Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative - UCLA

PDF - Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative - UCLA

PDF - Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative - UCLA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

lets were found almost<br />

everywhere in Mesopotamia,<br />

with identical<br />

contents. The wide<br />

diffusion of standard<br />

metrology by way of<br />

education explains why<br />

mathematical texts are<br />

relatively homogenous<br />

in their notations of<br />

numbers and measures.<br />

It is clear, however, that<br />

a detailed study of all<br />

numerical notations in<br />

cuneiform mathematical<br />

texts still needs to<br />

be carried out.<br />

§5.3.2. As a matter<br />

of fact, some graphical<br />

anomalies do occur. I<br />

will quote here a few<br />

examples related to the notation of measures in ninda.<br />

YBC 4612, obv., 1 (MCT, S):<br />

Usually, these notations are transliterated 3.45 ninda<br />

and 1.20 ninda, as if the notation were positional (see<br />

§6.5). However, if we consider the whole text, we fi nd<br />

the following notations:<br />

YBC 4612 rev. 6:<br />

YBC 4612 rev. 11:<br />

YBC 4612 rev. 13:<br />

System S<br />

System used<br />

in SKL<br />

System used<br />

in colophons<br />

Common<br />

system<br />

Positional<br />

system<br />

§5.3.3. If the notations were positional, the klasmatogram

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!