D--048966 - CALFED Bay-Delta Program - State of California
D--048966 - CALFED Bay-Delta Program - State of California
D--048966 - CALFED Bay-Delta Program - State of California
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
907<br />
Hydrology and Water Resources<br />
ity in managed streams should have ecological benefits in source <strong>of</strong> aggregate whenever possible and avoiding chemimost<br />
cases. In some cases, changes in reservoir releases to cal use in surface waters. The Department <strong>of</strong> Fish and Game<br />
benefit downstream organisms and water quality may have (which administers streambed alteration agreements) might<br />
few adverse impacts on economics <strong>of</strong> the project. In other be able to negotiate agreements between reservoir operators<br />
cases, there may be substantial costs, which may not be justi- and aggregate miners and users.<br />
fled for the intended benefits. The trade<strong>of</strong>fs between in-stream Modern information on sediment yields is needed to deimpacts<br />
and operational impacts must be carefully evaluated termine whether sedimentation has increased as a result <strong>of</strong><br />
in the context <strong>of</strong> each water project, the watershed it is lo- land-management activities. The <strong>California</strong> Department <strong>of</strong><br />
cated in, and the ultimate downstream uses. There could be Water Resources’ Division <strong>of</strong> Dam Safety, the U.S. Geological<br />
continued realignments in water rights as a result <strong>of</strong> applica- Survey, and the U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service<br />
tion <strong>of</strong> the public trust doctrine, hydropower relicensing re- might be the appropriate agencies to cooperatively adminisquirements,<br />
and regulation <strong>of</strong> reservoir releases by the ter a program <strong>of</strong> routine reservoir sediment surveys.<br />
regional water quality control boards for water quality man- More efficient means <strong>of</strong> monitoring hydrologic impacts<br />
agement. The <strong>State</strong> Water Resources Control Board could ease from land-management activities need to be explored at the<br />
legal and administrative matters by improving their water- operational field level and at the institutional level. Existing<br />
rights database. An efficient, geographically referenced data- programs do not seem to provide the information necessary<br />
base for water rights could allow examination <strong>of</strong> in-stream to evaluate how stream-flow regimes or water quality atflow<br />
conditions in a cumulative context for each stream and tributes are changing as a result <strong>of</strong> changes in land use. Curriver<br />
system. Designation <strong>of</strong> additional wild and scenic riv- rent monitoring is also not adequate to determine whether<br />
ers could help maintain ecological values <strong>of</strong> selected segments, restoration activities, including postfire treatments, are effec-<br />
Major reconstruction <strong>of</strong> smaller dams to allow sediment -! tive and appropriate. Maintenance and improvement <strong>of</strong> the<br />
pass-through under high-flow conditions could help restore ; snow survey, snow sensor, and climate station network is essome<br />
semblance <strong>of</strong> a natural sediment regime to many sential to management <strong>of</strong> water resources and detection <strong>of</strong><br />
streams. Such work is a serious challenge in hydraulic engi- climate trends. Basic data collection programs to generate<br />
neering and reservoir management, but it would be an im- ’ stream-flow, water quality, and climate information need to<br />
portant contribution <strong>of</strong> technology to restoring natural have long-term support to be worthwhile.<br />
processes in the managed rivers <strong>of</strong> the Sierra Nevada. Provi- Now that the forest road network is largely complete, more<br />
sion for flushing flows is particularly important where land attention should be focused on maintenance, relocation, updisturbance<br />
may have augmented natural sedimentation and grading, and decommissioning <strong>of</strong> roads by the engineering<br />
regulated flows encourage sediment deposition, staffs <strong>of</strong> the national forests. Resource staffs have already iden-<br />
Recent actions by the <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong> and the U.S. For- tified many <strong>of</strong> the specific problems in the road network that<br />
est Service to use watersheds as a geographic basis for plan- need attention. Road construction budgets have been high in<br />
ning and management are encouraging. As local agencies and the past, and adequate funding is necessary to maintain, imcitizens<br />
begin to incorporate a watershed basis into their own prove, and reduce the existing road system to minimize its<br />
activities, overall conservation <strong>of</strong> aquatic resources should aquatic impacts.<br />
greatly improve. Continued public education about basic As foothill communities continue to grow, conversion from<br />
watershed concepts can only help. Application <strong>of</strong> watershe~-I individual septic systems (and individual wells, in some cases)<br />
analysis methodologies developed in the Pacific Northwest I to community systems will be necessary to avoid cumulative<br />
(e.g., Montgomery et al. 1995) to the Sierra Nevada would be ! impacts on local water quality. Construction <strong>of</strong> treatment faa<br />
worthwhile step toward improved management <strong>of</strong> wild- ! cilities and collector systems is extremely expensive, especially<br />
lands at the landscape scale (see Berg et al. 1996). Watershedo~ where houses are far apart. The issue <strong>of</strong> who pays for such<br />
analysis can provide managers with better information about improvements is problematic. The community systems would<br />
resource capabilities, existing problems, and sensitive areas not be necessary if not for the growth in potential pollution<br />
before plans are made and projects are proposed. This analy- sources. At the same time, a community system is necessary<br />
sis develops a logical foundation for decision making, because the capacity <strong>of</strong> the soil and ground-water system to<br />
Reform <strong>of</strong> the 1872 Mining Act and greater application <strong>of</strong> treat household sewage is at or near its limit. Except for the<br />
<strong>California</strong>’s Surface Mining and Reclamation Act to smaller service area <strong>of</strong> the Nevada Irrigation District, Calaveras<br />
claims could improve many isolated problems associated with County Water District, and a few others, foothill communimining<br />
and prevent future adverse impacts. Laws relating to ties will need to develop major new sources <strong>of</strong> water or drasliability<br />
that prevent rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> abandoned mines need tically reduce existing demand if they wish to continue their<br />
to be modified, and funding must be generated to clean up growth. Unless hydroelectric generating capacity is added<br />
problem mines. Mining <strong>of</strong> sand and gravel in streams <strong>of</strong> the when developing new sources <strong>of</strong> supply, project financing and<br />
Sierra Nevada should be directed toward reservoir deltas, end-user water rates may be serious constraints on new<br />
despite the increase in transportation cost. Public agencies projects. Purchase <strong>of</strong> existing facilities (now largely owned<br />
should set an example by using reservoir sediments as a by the Pacific Gas and Electric Company)by small communi-<br />
D--04901 9<br />
D-049019