Answer of Defendants to Plaintiffs' first amended complaint
Answer of Defendants to Plaintiffs' first amended complaint
Answer of Defendants to Plaintiffs' first amended complaint
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Case 2:09-cv-00464-GLF-NMK Document 30 Filed 09/08/09 Page 5 <strong>of</strong> 26<br />
27. The allegations <strong>of</strong> paragraph 27 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>first</strong> <strong>amended</strong> <strong>complaint</strong> are denied for want <strong>of</strong><br />
knowledge or information sufficient <strong>to</strong> form a belief as <strong>to</strong> the truth <strong>of</strong> their validity.<br />
28. It is admitted that H.R. On Call, Inc. is a corporation duly organized under the laws <strong>of</strong><br />
Ohio and engaged by At<strong>to</strong>rney Mills<strong>to</strong>ne <strong>to</strong> conduct an independent investigation <strong>of</strong> a <strong>complaint</strong><br />
filed against John Freshwater, a teacher at the Mt. Vernon City Schools. All remaining allegations<br />
<strong>of</strong> paragraph 28 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>first</strong> <strong>amended</strong> <strong>complaint</strong> are denied for want <strong>of</strong> knowledge or information<br />
sufficient <strong>to</strong> form a belief as <strong>to</strong> the truth <strong>of</strong> their validity.<br />
29. It is admitted that H.R. On Call, Inc. provided a report <strong>of</strong> its investigation <strong>to</strong> legal<br />
counsel for Mt. Vernon City Schools. All remaining allegations <strong>of</strong> paragraph 29 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>first</strong><br />
<strong>amended</strong> <strong>complaint</strong> are denied for want <strong>of</strong> knowledge or information sufficient <strong>to</strong> form a belief as<br />
<strong>to</strong> the truth <strong>of</strong> their validity.<br />
30. It is admitted that H.R. On Call, Inc. conducted an independent investigation <strong>of</strong> a<br />
<strong>complaint</strong> against John Freshwater. Thomas J. Herlevi and Julia F. Herlevi are the owners <strong>of</strong> H.R.<br />
On Call, Inc. and the individuals that participated in the investigation. All remaining allegations <strong>of</strong><br />
paragraph 30 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>first</strong> <strong>amended</strong> <strong>complaint</strong> are denied.<br />
31. The allegations <strong>of</strong> paragraph 31 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>first</strong> <strong>amended</strong> <strong>complaint</strong> are denied for want <strong>of</strong><br />
knowledge or information sufficient <strong>to</strong> form a belief as <strong>to</strong> the truth <strong>of</strong> their validity.<br />
32. The allegations <strong>of</strong> paragraph 32 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>first</strong> <strong>amended</strong> <strong>complaint</strong> are denied for want <strong>of</strong><br />
knowledge or information sufficient <strong>to</strong> form a belief as <strong>to</strong> the truth <strong>of</strong> their validity.<br />
33. The allegations <strong>of</strong> paragraph 33 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>first</strong> <strong>amended</strong> <strong>complaint</strong> are denied for want <strong>of</strong><br />
knowledge or information sufficient <strong>to</strong> form a belief as <strong>to</strong> the truth <strong>of</strong> their validity.<br />
34. It is admitted that H.R. On Call, Inc. provided David Mills<strong>to</strong>ne with its investigation<br />
report, which was clarified in draft form before final submission. All remaining allegations <strong>of</strong><br />
paragraph 34 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>first</strong> <strong>amended</strong> <strong>complaint</strong> are denied.<br />
5
Change language