Recommendations for a Marking, Tagging, and Recovery Program ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Results Watershed-specific natural production No hatchery fish in returns Slight bias in ocean catch estimates which decreased with higher ESR and lower ECV Biased ratio estimator CFM rate did not show any influence no hatchery fish to separate out ESR and ECV most influential
Results Watershed-specific natural production Hatchery fish mixed with wild fish Type M stocks (majority wild) CSR, ESR, ECV lowered RMEE and RISK CFM rate did not have much affect on total production A slight affect on freshwater catch estimates
Page 1 and 2: Recommendations for a marking, tagg
Page 3 and 4: History of “Constant Fractional M
Page 5 and 6: Implementations of CFM 1979-1982 B
Page 7 and 8: What you can get from a CFM program
Page 9 and 10: Sacramento System Complications La
Page 11 and 12: Assumptions Non-selective fisherie
Page 13 and 14: Estimating hatchery catches Ocean
Page 15 and 16: Estimating wild escapement In-rive
Page 17 and 18: Estimating wild ocean catch - simpl
Page 19 and 20: CFM Sim (Allan Hicks - MS Thesis w/
Page 21 and 22: Design of Simulation Experiments (C
Page 23 and 24: Performance measures Relative Mean
Page 25 and 26: Results Hatchery-specific productio
Page 27: Results Watershed-specific natural
Page 31 and 32: Conclusions Hatchery fish as surrog
Page 33 and 34: Conclusions Escapement estimation
Page 35: Primary Conclusions Use CFM rate o

Recommendations for a Marking, Tagging, and Recovery Program ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?