Recommendations for a Marking, Tagging, and Recovery Program ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The original CFM Idea Allow ad+CWT programs to proceed as they had been. Mark a constant fraction of remaining “production” releases with fin clip. pˆ = x ad + c⋅ n x fc
Implementations of CFM 1979-1982 BYs: Iron Gate <strong>and</strong> Trinity River Hatcheries – fin clip 1/3 of all “production” releases in excess of ad+CWT fish. (Hankin 1982) 1999 BY-present: Trinity River Hatchery – 25% of all releases receive ad+CWT (Hankin & Newman 1999) 2001 – present: Various Locations -100% ad-clipped at federal hatcheries (Mass <strong>Marking</strong>/selective fisheries), but not all have CWT! (Federal Legislation) 2005-??: CA CV ?? (Newman/Hicks & Hankin)
Page 1 and 2: Recommendations for a marking, tagg
Page 3: History of “Constant Fractional M
Page 7 and 8: What you can get from a CFM program
Page 9 and 10: Sacramento System Complications La
Page 11 and 12: Assumptions Non-selective fisherie
Page 13 and 14: Estimating hatchery catches Ocean
Page 15 and 16: Estimating wild escapement In-rive
Page 17 and 18: Estimating wild ocean catch - simpl
Page 19 and 20: CFM Sim (Allan Hicks - MS Thesis w/
Page 21 and 22: Design of Simulation Experiments (C
Page 23 and 24: Performance measures Relative Mean
Page 25 and 26: Results Hatchery-specific productio
Page 27 and 28: Results Watershed-specific natural
Page 29 and 30: Results Watershed-specific natural
Page 31 and 32: Conclusions Hatchery fish as surrog
Page 33 and 34: Conclusions Escapement estimation
Page 35: Primary Conclusions Use CFM rate o

Recommendations for a Marking, Tagging, and Recovery Program ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?