REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS - NYC.gov

SECTION V: PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND CONTRACT AWARD PROCEDURES
A. Evaluation Procedures
All proposals accepted by the Agency will be reviewed to determine whether they are responsive or non-responsive to the
requisites of this RFP. Proposals that are determined by the agency to be non-responsive will be rejected. The Agency’s
Evaluation Committee will evaluate and rate all remaining proposals based on the Evaluation Criteria prescribed below.
The following two (2) step selection process will be used:
STEP I - Submission of Technical Proposal and establishment of a List of Top Qualified Proposers
Proposers are to submit by the applicable due date and time prescribed in the RFP (See Section I - Timetable), a
Technical Proposal that addresses the information requested in Appendix B - and Form 1.
B. Evaluation Criteria
Evaluation of Technical Proposal
The Evaluation Committee will rate all responsive Technical Proposals pursuant to the following criteria:
A. Project Delivery Related Criteria
A1. Maintenance and protection of Traffic, staging and sequencing of operations 15%
A2. Understanding of scope, DOT’s goals and objectives; required design approvals
and permits; quality assurance and quality control; constructability of proposed
scheme;ability to anticipate problems and provide solutions; and long term
maintenance considerations. 15%
B. Impact and Coordination Related Criteria
B1. Anticipated issues with SIRTOA and plan to address them. Impact of contractor’s
scheme to SIRTOA’s operations and Force Account costs. 8%
B2. Anticipated issues with MTA buses and plan to address them. Impact of
proposed scheme to MTA’s operations. 5%
B3. Impact to and coordination with DOT-Ferries. Impact to parking lot and taxi services 5%
C. Schedule
Ability to support proposed contract and construction duration and ability to support
proposed durations through a coherent and detailed CPM Schedule and through a
demonstration of company resources, personnel, equipment and bonding capability 17%
D. Organizational Chart, Relevant Experience of Firm (Consultant and Contractor) and
Relevant Experience of Key Personnel 15%
E. Safety Record and Specific Safety Concerns for this Project and Plan to Address them 10%
F. Other
F1. Community outreach and ability to address last minute community requests 7%
F2. Environmental and aesthetic considerations 3%
Establishment of a “Short-List” of Best Rated Firms Based on Technical Proposals
Upon completion of the evaluation of the Technical Proposal, proposers will be ranked in descending order of score. A
“short-list” of only those proposers who submit highly relevant and acceptable proposals with better than adequate
understanding of approach and innovativeness in most project areas, which have scored 80% or higher, will be
established. Proposers not included on the “short-list” will not be further considered.
• All proposers will be notified in writing as to whether or not they are included on the “short-list”.
10
100%